Role and Responsibilities in the Conclusion of the Angra 3 NPP and

Role and
Responsibilities in the
Conclusion of the
Angra 3 NPP and
New Builds
ELETRONUCLEAR
IAEA Technical Meeting
Carlos A. R. Ferreira
December 2016
Project Management Superintendency
Assistant
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 1
Introduction – Brazilian Energy Matrix

Integrated electric power system: continental
dimensions
Fortaleza
Manaus
Recife
Brasília
Belo
Horizonte
Itaipu
Salvador
ELETRONUCLEAR
4.000
km
Rio de Janeiro
São Paulo
Porto Alegre
Angra
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 2
Introduction – Brazilian Energy Matrix 2015
Renovation of the Energy Matrix
o
Difficulties and uncertainties in a mainly
hydropower system
o
Need for securing energy supply and
economic competitiveness
Coal
4,5%
o
Composition of a power supply based on
a sustainable, diversified and
competitive energy
Biomass
8,0%
o
Increasing difficulties to increase the
installed hydropower capacity
(transmission lines, environmental
challenges, low capacity factors…)
ELETRONUCLEAR
Natural Gas
12,9%
Nuclear
2,4%
HidroPower
64,0%
Wind
3,5%
Oil
4,8%
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 3
Introduction – Brazilian Energy Matrix
Reasons for a Program of Nuclear
Power Generation
o Long-term strategy to provide a supply of sustainable,
diversified and competitive energy;
o Introduction of advanced energy technologies of high
performance and safety;
o A Nuclear Power Program is an Industrial Project;
o Economies of scale and gradual cost reduction;
ELETRONUCLEAR
o Productive capacity in Brazil and insertion in global
value chains;
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 4
Current Nuclear Installed Capacity
ANGRA 1 - PWR
Installed Capacity: 657 MW
Technology: Westinghouse
Start of Operation: January 1985
ANGRA 2 - PWR
Installed Capacity : 1.350 MW
Technology : KWU/ Siemens (AREVA)
Start of Operation : February 2001
ANGRA 3 - PWR
Installed Capacity : 1.405 MW
Technology: KWU/ Siemens/ Areva
Start of Operation : December 2022
ELETRONUCLEAR
Belo Horizonte
350km
São Paulo
220km
CNAAA
Rio de Janeiro
130km
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 5
Angra 3

Initial Phase of the Project
Grafenrheinfeld
- 1975: Brazil – Germany Agreement (Pacific Use of Nuclear Power)
- Reactor type: PWR-1.350 MW / Power uprate to 1.405 MW
- Original Contract:
1976 (together with Angra 2)
- Original Reference Plant: Grafenrheinfeld
- Start of civil works:
July-1984
- Construction suspension:

Junho-1986
Original Design modernization
- Konvoy series: Emsland / Neckarwestheim 2 / Isar 2
- Implementation of modernization:
Emsland
Neckarwestheim
Isar
Angra 2 e Angra 3
ELETRONUCLEAR

Current design reference
- Reference plant: Angra 2
- Angra 2 documentation:
Partial use for Angra 3
Angra 2
- Base for the Angra 3 PSAR: Angra 2 FSAR
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 6
Angra 3

National Supplies
- Market Guaranty Protocol:
Main purpose: to develop the
national industry for the nuclear sector
- Valid for Angra 2 and Angra 3

Siemens/KWU (AREVA)
- Scope: Technology transfer and basic and detailed design and supplies
for the nuclear and safety systems
- Supplies, Services and Guarantees for Angra 2 and
Angra 3

Authorization for Project Resumption
- Governmental decision in June 2007
- Civil works resumed in 2009
ELETRONUCLEAR
Agra 2
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 7
Angra 3
ANGRA 2: Reference Plant
D
E
S
I
G
N
ANGRA 2 “AS-BUILT” +
Design Changes/Adaptations
• Foundation on rocks
• Design changes from Angra 2
• Digital I & C
ANGRA 2
ANGRA 3
Executive
documents for
Angra
3
ELETRONUCLEAR
Extensive use of the Angra 2 design documentation (~70%)
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 8
Angra 3

Costs that had already been incurred around R$ 1.5 billion,
approximately US$ 455M (infrastructure, basic design and
detailing engineering, import and national equipment already
delivered

Strict preservation (proven techniques from Angra 2)

Around 13,500 tons of already
delivered components







Diesel Generators
Heavy components for the
primary circuitELETRONUCLEAR
(RPV, SGs,
RCPs, PRZ)
Part of the TG-Set components
Process equipment
Piping
Pumps
Valves
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 9
Angra 3
Project Physical Progress
Global Physical Progress = 60,6% (July/16)
Accumulated performed until July 2016
Accumulated planned until July 2016
60,6%
PROJECT
60,5%
80,8%
Engineering
80,4%
76,0%
75,8%
Supply
67,3%
67,3%
Civil Works
Electromechanical
Assembly
ELETRONUCLEAR
10,8%
10,8%
Note: The baseline for this Project Progress is of 30,34% in 2009 (Project Resumption – civil works)
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 10
Angra 3 - Original Contracts (status 2014/15) – State Model
ANGRA 3
MAIN CONTRACTS
RENEGOTIATED
CONTRACTS
Import Supplies,
Services, Warranty &
Guarantee
Civil
Construction
NEW BIDS
Electromechanical
Erection
Engineering
ELETRONUCLEAR
Services
Civil Design and
Structures
Non-Nuclear Buildings
National Supplies
National Supplies
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 11
Angra 3
Relevant Facts 2015
 Limitations imposed to ELETRONUCLEAR’S cashflow due to the
reduction of the Angra 1 and 2 tariffs, which led to a considerable
revenue loss, prevented the company from providing the required
counterpayments to make withdrawals from the external
financing
 Start of the “Car Wash” operation
 Due to the above, ELETRONUCLEAR was forced to take
exceptional measures:
 Payment delays
ELETRONUCLEAR
 Contract suspensions / Pace reduction
 General Executive Schedule – start of commercial operation in
December 2022
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 12
Angra 3 New Model
ANGRA 3
MAIN CONTRACTS
NEW BIDS
RENEGOTIATED
CONTRACTS
NEW BIDS
Civil Construction
Import Supplies,
Services, Warranty &
Guarantee
Civil
Construction
Civil Design and
Structures
Non-Nuclear Buildings
Remaining
Engineering
Services
Electromechanical
Erection
ELETRONUCLEAR
Remaining
National
Supplies
National Supplies
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 13
Angra 3 – Main Challenges
Angra 3 New Model
 Definition of legal framework and business model for private partner
participation
 Bidding process for private partner participation (or InterGovernment Agreement)
 New energy contractual model (tariff) to ensure private stakeholder
participation
 Financial resources for Project completion (State funding or private
participation)
 Engineering Works
ELETRONUCLEAR
 Civil Construction, Eletromechanical Erection and Commissioning
 Licensing and Enviromental commitments
 Applicability of the new model to new NPPs
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 14
Angra 3 – Main Challenges
Angra 3 New Model
 Definition of scope for ELETRONUCLEAR (owner) and for the private
partner:
 Eletronuclear to be the responsible for:
 Plant commissioning and operation
 Licensing activities
 Delivery of equipment (to be confirmed)
 Design of the plant
ELETRONUCLEAR
 Engineering support during construction and erection
(to be
confirmed)
 Contract with OEM (AREVA)
 Digital I&C
 Angra 3 Simulator (to be confirmed)
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 15
Angra 3 – Main Challenges
Company Challenges at Corporate Level
Company reestructuring
Cultural Changes / Integration of Different Areas
Compliance Initiatives
Personnel Replacement and Training
Preservation of company technical knowledge
New management model (mixed management team, supervision over
ELETRONUCLEAR
the private partner, centralized management towards a single
contractor...)
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 16
Angra 3
ELETRONUCLEAR
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 17
Carlos A. R. Ferreira
[email protected]
ELETRONUCLEAR
IAEA Technical Meeting
December, 2016 / Page 18