Role and Responsibilities in the Conclusion of the Angra 3 NPP and New Builds ELETRONUCLEAR IAEA Technical Meeting Carlos A. R. Ferreira December 2016 Project Management Superintendency Assistant IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 1 Introduction – Brazilian Energy Matrix Integrated electric power system: continental dimensions Fortaleza Manaus Recife Brasília Belo Horizonte Itaipu Salvador ELETRONUCLEAR 4.000 km Rio de Janeiro São Paulo Porto Alegre Angra IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 2 Introduction – Brazilian Energy Matrix 2015 Renovation of the Energy Matrix o Difficulties and uncertainties in a mainly hydropower system o Need for securing energy supply and economic competitiveness Coal 4,5% o Composition of a power supply based on a sustainable, diversified and competitive energy Biomass 8,0% o Increasing difficulties to increase the installed hydropower capacity (transmission lines, environmental challenges, low capacity factors…) ELETRONUCLEAR Natural Gas 12,9% Nuclear 2,4% HidroPower 64,0% Wind 3,5% Oil 4,8% IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 3 Introduction – Brazilian Energy Matrix Reasons for a Program of Nuclear Power Generation o Long-term strategy to provide a supply of sustainable, diversified and competitive energy; o Introduction of advanced energy technologies of high performance and safety; o A Nuclear Power Program is an Industrial Project; o Economies of scale and gradual cost reduction; ELETRONUCLEAR o Productive capacity in Brazil and insertion in global value chains; IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 4 Current Nuclear Installed Capacity ANGRA 1 - PWR Installed Capacity: 657 MW Technology: Westinghouse Start of Operation: January 1985 ANGRA 2 - PWR Installed Capacity : 1.350 MW Technology : KWU/ Siemens (AREVA) Start of Operation : February 2001 ANGRA 3 - PWR Installed Capacity : 1.405 MW Technology: KWU/ Siemens/ Areva Start of Operation : December 2022 ELETRONUCLEAR Belo Horizonte 350km São Paulo 220km CNAAA Rio de Janeiro 130km IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 5 Angra 3 Initial Phase of the Project Grafenrheinfeld - 1975: Brazil – Germany Agreement (Pacific Use of Nuclear Power) - Reactor type: PWR-1.350 MW / Power uprate to 1.405 MW - Original Contract: 1976 (together with Angra 2) - Original Reference Plant: Grafenrheinfeld - Start of civil works: July-1984 - Construction suspension: Junho-1986 Original Design modernization - Konvoy series: Emsland / Neckarwestheim 2 / Isar 2 - Implementation of modernization: Emsland Neckarwestheim Isar Angra 2 e Angra 3 ELETRONUCLEAR Current design reference - Reference plant: Angra 2 - Angra 2 documentation: Partial use for Angra 3 Angra 2 - Base for the Angra 3 PSAR: Angra 2 FSAR IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 6 Angra 3 National Supplies - Market Guaranty Protocol: Main purpose: to develop the national industry for the nuclear sector - Valid for Angra 2 and Angra 3 Siemens/KWU (AREVA) - Scope: Technology transfer and basic and detailed design and supplies for the nuclear and safety systems - Supplies, Services and Guarantees for Angra 2 and Angra 3 Authorization for Project Resumption - Governmental decision in June 2007 - Civil works resumed in 2009 ELETRONUCLEAR Agra 2 IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 7 Angra 3 ANGRA 2: Reference Plant D E S I G N ANGRA 2 “AS-BUILT” + Design Changes/Adaptations • Foundation on rocks • Design changes from Angra 2 • Digital I & C ANGRA 2 ANGRA 3 Executive documents for Angra 3 ELETRONUCLEAR Extensive use of the Angra 2 design documentation (~70%) IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 8 Angra 3 Costs that had already been incurred around R$ 1.5 billion, approximately US$ 455M (infrastructure, basic design and detailing engineering, import and national equipment already delivered Strict preservation (proven techniques from Angra 2) Around 13,500 tons of already delivered components Diesel Generators Heavy components for the primary circuitELETRONUCLEAR (RPV, SGs, RCPs, PRZ) Part of the TG-Set components Process equipment Piping Pumps Valves IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 9 Angra 3 Project Physical Progress Global Physical Progress = 60,6% (July/16) Accumulated performed until July 2016 Accumulated planned until July 2016 60,6% PROJECT 60,5% 80,8% Engineering 80,4% 76,0% 75,8% Supply 67,3% 67,3% Civil Works Electromechanical Assembly ELETRONUCLEAR 10,8% 10,8% Note: The baseline for this Project Progress is of 30,34% in 2009 (Project Resumption – civil works) IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 10 Angra 3 - Original Contracts (status 2014/15) – State Model ANGRA 3 MAIN CONTRACTS RENEGOTIATED CONTRACTS Import Supplies, Services, Warranty & Guarantee Civil Construction NEW BIDS Electromechanical Erection Engineering ELETRONUCLEAR Services Civil Design and Structures Non-Nuclear Buildings National Supplies National Supplies IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 11 Angra 3 Relevant Facts 2015 Limitations imposed to ELETRONUCLEAR’S cashflow due to the reduction of the Angra 1 and 2 tariffs, which led to a considerable revenue loss, prevented the company from providing the required counterpayments to make withdrawals from the external financing Start of the “Car Wash” operation Due to the above, ELETRONUCLEAR was forced to take exceptional measures: Payment delays ELETRONUCLEAR Contract suspensions / Pace reduction General Executive Schedule – start of commercial operation in December 2022 IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 12 Angra 3 New Model ANGRA 3 MAIN CONTRACTS NEW BIDS RENEGOTIATED CONTRACTS NEW BIDS Civil Construction Import Supplies, Services, Warranty & Guarantee Civil Construction Civil Design and Structures Non-Nuclear Buildings Remaining Engineering Services Electromechanical Erection ELETRONUCLEAR Remaining National Supplies National Supplies IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 13 Angra 3 – Main Challenges Angra 3 New Model Definition of legal framework and business model for private partner participation Bidding process for private partner participation (or InterGovernment Agreement) New energy contractual model (tariff) to ensure private stakeholder participation Financial resources for Project completion (State funding or private participation) Engineering Works ELETRONUCLEAR Civil Construction, Eletromechanical Erection and Commissioning Licensing and Enviromental commitments Applicability of the new model to new NPPs IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 14 Angra 3 – Main Challenges Angra 3 New Model Definition of scope for ELETRONUCLEAR (owner) and for the private partner: Eletronuclear to be the responsible for: Plant commissioning and operation Licensing activities Delivery of equipment (to be confirmed) Design of the plant ELETRONUCLEAR Engineering support during construction and erection (to be confirmed) Contract with OEM (AREVA) Digital I&C Angra 3 Simulator (to be confirmed) IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 15 Angra 3 – Main Challenges Company Challenges at Corporate Level Company reestructuring Cultural Changes / Integration of Different Areas Compliance Initiatives Personnel Replacement and Training Preservation of company technical knowledge New management model (mixed management team, supervision over ELETRONUCLEAR the private partner, centralized management towards a single contractor...) IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 16 Angra 3 ELETRONUCLEAR IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 17 Carlos A. R. Ferreira [email protected] ELETRONUCLEAR IAEA Technical Meeting December, 2016 / Page 18
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz