T H E . O N T A R I OB. O A R D .O F . E X A M I N E R SI.N . P S Y C H O L O G Y
LEG
I S'/.TION REV
IEW
HPBOFESS'O'US
HEALT
effect,or if the patient patientor clientshouldprovidethe basisfor
has no beneficial
14th,1987,theBoardof Exam0n December
by thepractia particulartreatment,
fur[herinvestiga- selecting
to deteriorate,
continues
fromthe Health
received
inersin Psychology
0f the
assessment,
ongoing
Lioner.
Similarly,
a
where
appropriate
or,
tion
is
undertaken
setRevisv
a
document
Legislation
Professions
patientor clientin therapyshoulddetermine
profession
is made.
referrallo
another
should
whichit,proposed
[ingout 12activities
is trobeconttnued.
a new
as outlined whethera lreatment,
In our view,a diagnosis,
for scopeof
be licensedand the sta[ements
referralto
a
or
a
modality
adopted,
therapeutic
fact,
done.
or,
in
is
rarely
necessary
above,
prac[ice
Onlyoneof theacts
for2l disciplines.
Ourdifconsidered.
clinician
forexample
thatanassessment,mor€appropriate
Webelieve
proposed
to
is of directinLerest
for licensure
usedto
whata ficultiesbeginwith the statements
is precisely
ratherthana diagnosis
TheReviewoffers
viz. diagnosis.
Psychology,
'diagnosisi
It is herethatweboth
physician
or dentistdoesin mos[instances. characterrze
asthescopeofpractice
statement
thef0llowing
theReview seekandofferclarification.
Withtheuseofthislanguage
theactof diagwhichexcludes
for Psychology
letterit is
0n pagethreeof Mr.Schwartz's
intends
0osignalthatther€is a distinction
nosls:
The pmposedthat licensureof diagnosiswould
betweendiagnosisand assessment.
is the assessTheprac[iceof psychology
from"providis more prohibitthosewithouta licence
is that,a diagnosis
and mentalprocesses, keydistinction
mentof behaviour
-. andtffirnent
provide
purporting
with
an
individual
[o
ingor
conclusisn
that
a
definitive
in
absolute,
or
undeof maladaptive
0f
s[atement
aboutthe aetiology
is a conclusive
the healthstateof an individual
aboub
to maintainor enhance
siredbehaviour,
or pathology'l
disease
basedon an analysisof physio- his or her condition,
reached,
physical,
socialand
emotional,
intellectual,
wha[is t0 be underslood
Firstlet usconsider
logicalcausality.
functioning.
interpersonal
wewillexam-'
andsubsequently
will recallthat,the scopeof by"aetiology"
Registrants
All twelvelicensedac[ivi[iesare awarded
of
proposed
stat€men["
component
by the Boardto inethe "conclusive
as: practicestat€ment
is defined
whosescopeof practice
medicine
0f prohibition.
statement
in THEBULLETIN theanticipated
is the diagnosis, the Revisvand repor[ed
of medicine
Thepractice
Laterwordingon pagethreeof Mr. SchIn
included
theterm"diagnosis'i
19BO)
0f (Nov.,
tr€atmentand prevention
assessment,
themeaning
a[tributed
wartz's
letteramplifies
of
charac[erization
ligh[
of
Mr.
schwartz's
the
or
other
dysfunction
inlury
disease
any
to boththe [erms"diagnosis"
it bea licensed by the Revierv
diagnosis
andhisproposalthat
physical
or mentalcondition.
whereinthe formeris viewed
psychology,
theBoardviews and"aetiology"
A letterfromAlanM.fthwartzaccompany- actnotaccorded
"a
about
definitive
conclusion
as
r€prcsenting
proposed
diagnolicensureof
and
definition
the
forthe
a iustification
offered
ingthisdocument
basedon
andquiteout0f touch the healths[ateof the individual,
licensureproposals.The most controversial sisas badlyconceived
causality".
psycholog- an analysisof physiological
andthe with the realitiesof contemporary
ofdiagnosis
itemisthatofthelicensing
"Aetiology"
frequently
not
medical
term
is
a
practice
has
The followingsubmission
andden- ical
of thisactivityto medicine
restriction
it
s[rongly
connotes
since
so
today
encountered
the
Health
Mr.
and
bo
&hwartz
been
sent
quote
letter:
Mr.
from schwartz's
tistry.'lb
philosophy
whichheldthat
an oldermedical
Revisv.
Legislation
of the needLo Professions
TheRevisvwasconvinced
or physiohada singlephysical
eachdisease
bolimitthe riskof harm
license
diagnosis
T
H
E
BOARD'S
SUBM'SS'OAI
philosophy
reof
medical
This
logical
cause.
inherentin a mis-or misseddiagnosis.
practice
well
in
the
medicine
served
search
and
with
the
scope
issue
wishes
to
[ake
without
a
The
Board
those
Reviov's
model,
Underthe
in mostareasof
in past,but,hasbeensuperceded
offeredfor psychology
definition
wouldbe prohibited of practice
licencet0 diagnose
"General
practice
viewsof caussophisticated
more
by
ScopeStateentitled
to providean the document
or purporting
fromproviding
for many
views
hold
that,
ality.
C,ontemporary
we
will
Reviov"
and
by the
s[atement, mentsPmposed
individualwith a conclusive
differing
configuraor
conditions,
disorders
to
which
we
believe
be
new
a
statement
his
or
her
condition,
submit
of
aetiology
the
about
forthepresfactorsaccoun[
tionsof causative
position
of tlg &
withthe-general
consisten[
or pathology.
disease
individuals.
different
rhe
disorder-in
ence
of
pracof thecurrent
What,
theRevisvdoesNOIintend[0 restrict visv andwiththerealities
range
of
causative
the
"diagnosis"
views
also
extend
Such
psychology.
it
however,
Before
doing
this,
is
the
[iceof
of
thmughbhelicensure
proin thediagnostic
to beconsidered
theunderstandingfactors,
or willbenecessary
to discuss
theirpa[ients
abilityof othersto assess
physiological
physical
to
or
the
cess,
beyond
that ofthelicensed
assetoutin Mr.
actofdiagnosis
clients,as theydo now.Werecognize
psychological
involve
include,
or
exclusively
11th,1987.
letterof December
0f any sort in the Schwartz's
treatment,
under[aking
or behavioral D
cognitive
of anemotional,
wouldbe imFirst,of all, wewishto indicateour agree- facLors
of an assessment
absence
Whilethislast,pointmaybegenerally
as l0 nature.
properpractice,
and wouldfall belowthe mentwith the positionthat decisions
for a widerangeof
andaccepted
harm undersLood
licensure
shouldbe based0n potential
of careof anyprofession.
standards
it shouldbe oa
disorders,
or
behavioral
men[al
quality
proposed
of
care
seem
for
of this fact,the
and that concerns
In recognition
generalscopeof practicestatements
of betterservedby a protected
title by mecha- trornein mindthat,it alsoapplies[o many
thoughtof as physical
commonly
body'siurisdic- conditions
theword"assess- nismswithineachgoverning
include
manyprofessions
nervosa,
ceftain :f
anorexia
as
such
disorders
whichmaintain
that the pro- [ion,andbythosemechanisms
ment':The Reviqvbelieves
etc.Thepoint[o be Z.
asthma,
practice.Sec- formsof childhood
posedsystemwill not in anyway impede high standardsof institutional
practice
of v
of madeis thatin thecontemporary
practitioners
from ondly,we agr€ewith the conceptualization
[o diagnose
no[licensed
'assessment'
psychology
kl
diagnoother
disciplines,
and
some
fromdiagnosis.
anditsdistinction
theirpatientsor clients0odeterassessing
description
be
a
technical
!o
is
understood
sis
points
:l
oftheworkof
range AsMr.Schwartz
out,most,
of a particular
minetheapplicability
'l
disorder,
a
factors
underlying
of
the
causal
physicians
pmfessionals,
and
a
including
undert'aking
health
from
of trcatmentsand
I
to
andis notconfined
or condition
ratherthandiag- dysfunction
involves
assessment
courseof treatmentin appmpriatesitua- dentists,
facuors.
of physiological
0f a ananalysis
of thepr€sentsbate
if thetreatment nosis.Anassessment
tions.As is thecasetroday,
a
parents
arein
siderationfor relateddisciplines.We have
5:Whendivorcing
EXAMPLE
on pagethreeof Mr. fthThediscussion
psy- accepted,
cost,indeterminate
at considerable
of children,
thecustody
regarding
theprop- dispute
wartz'sletterattributeslo diagnosis
"definitive
parents
legislation,
andhave
in
revisions
of
our
or
their
delays
the
may
be
asked
by
chologists
the
about
conclusion"
ertyofbeinga
shovrnpatiencein the slow and mystifying
bythecourt,to s[udyall
orbeordered
Thisterminology lawyers,
healthstateof an individual.
participants
TheReview
maythereof theReview.
andtheirinterrela- prccesses
thattheRe- thesignificant,
character
impliesan authoritative
our dismayin receiving
fhe
visvbelieves
shouldbeasuibedto a diagnosis tionsso that theymayofferparentsandthe foreunderstand
practice
proposals
for
Psychology's
scope
of
what
arrangepresumably,
as
to
conclusions
patient,
coun
definitive
also,
the
bu[
notonlyby
denyto ourproandarbitrarily,
ofthe whichclearly,
by otherswhodealwiththepatientor client, mentsarelikelyto bein thebest,interest
functions
that we
criticallyimportant
may influence
the fession
Suchjudgments
by the patient[o re- children.
andwhoare authorized
practise,
func[ions
to
but
award
these
well
now
may
0f
custody
and
disposition
cour['s
We
suchas a diagnosis.
ceiveinforma[ion
preparation
forsuchpractice
whose
regarding
accessand o[her disciplines
wouldagr€ethat,it is this patient-sanctionedaffectdecisrons
of the
Bothin the in[erests
by thirdpartiesthatdistin- matteN[hatbearon [hementalandphysica] is questionable.
useof a diagnosis
publicandourprofession,
wecanno[
accept
the
ofthechildren.
guishes
andthatis the healthanddevelopment
it,fmman assessment
proposals
for
Psychology.
Review's
are
often
asked
EXAMPLE
6:
Psychologists
potential
harmwhichwarrants
of
majorsource
of scopeof
to addressproblemsin staff organization, In offeringour news[a[ement
Howevet
by
activities.
licensing
of diagnostic
wehaveassumed
lhat theweightof
bear practice,
whichsometimes
trarningandselection
by
thatis employed
of diagnosis
thedefinition
will betowards
the
opinionwithintheReview
certainiobsor
ofhealthandsafety.
theRevisvandbythefailureto awardpsychol- onmatters
"diagmeaning
of
of
the
older
medical
positions
retention
with
high
rate
of
a
may
be
associated
Review's
the
licensed
act
of
diagnosis,
ogythe
psychologial nosis"and,accordingly,
wehaveemployed
the
pmposal
of the physicaliniury,absenteeism,
fliesin thefaceof therealities
"psychological
to condiagnosis"
expression
Studyof
prac[iceof psychology.
or disablinglevelsof anxtety.
Thefol- burn-out,
contemporary
oi the diagnostic
conclu- vey our concep[ualization
mayleadbodefinitive
examples suchsituabions
lowlngarc a fewof manypossible
We
engage.
in whichpsychologists
to be processes
the sor[oi individuals
in a diagnostic sionsregarding
engage
whereinpsychologists
wouldlikefo nobethat the trainingof psyIn
hazards.
to avoidsuchpersonal
process,
as we believe
this shouldbe under- selected
with
overlaps
that of psychologists
chiatrists
mayrequirea
bheconclusions
andthose otherinstances
or clients
andofferLopatients
stood,
procedures
psychodiagnos[ic
preparaand
to
respect
in
or
the
in
the
definition
change
condefinitive
as recipients,
that,theysanction
iob
theawardof this
that,wewouldnot,ques[ion
fortheiobin question.
abouttheirhealthstatewhichusually tory[raining
clusions
Wewouldques[ion
acttopsychiatrists.
thatcanbe licensed
Therearemanysuchexamples
as [o theirmanageresultin malordecisions
psycholoof
adding
[hisactto the
the
appropria[eness
drawnfrom the everydayworkof
byothers.
0r [reatment
ment,disposition
prac[ice
Review
medicine.
The
deof
gists,
scope
oi
health
within
the
working
and
outside
EXAMPLE1: Childrenwith a historyof
therealitythatpsy- finestrhescopeof practiceior all otherhealth
areasked careareas,that,illustra[e
lailurefrequently
academic
serious
savemedicine
and nursing,in
do professions,
andanalyses
in lheirassessmenl
Lobeseen chologists
agencies
or educaLional
by parents
of pracfocus.
The
scope
terms
of
their
unique
disorders,
about,
conclusions
conclusions makedefinitive
sothatdefinitive
bya psychologist
is
framed
in
an allproblems
medicine,
however,
of
tice
that
are
regarded
placeor
other
conditions
the
which
will
influence
received
maybe
generality
whichpermitsphysiand encompassing
program by clients,lawyers,iudges,physicians
mentofthechild,thetypeof remedial
If
cians[o perform[he functionsof all other
of themanage- otherhealthcareworkersas authoritative.
offered,
andyeto[heraspecLs
regardless
of the lackof
healthprofessionals
narrow
and
rather
not
to
a
one
does
subscribe
men[ofthechildaLhomeandat school.
their
trraining
and
experience
relationship
that
by
view
but
understands
of
diagnosis,
archaic
devel2: InfanLs
showing
serious
EXAMPLE
Wemust
claimed.
mightbearto thefunctions
of
appreciation
[echnical
ac- [histermaninformed
language
failures
in socializa[ion,
opmental
wedono[
formula,
for[hepresence takeissuewiththisgeneral
quisiLion,
etc.,arelikely thecausalfactorsaccounting
motorskillacquisition,
problemor conditionin a partricu- believe
thatthelimited[rainingandexaminaofa disorder,
for testingoi
to be referred[o a psychologist
psychiatry
received
by
in
andpsychology
tion
we
that
believe
or
situation,
then
lar
individual
and
functional
skills
developmenL,
cognitive
in Canadian
medical
students
thatpsychologists
domake undergraduate
Fromsuchevalu- onemustconclude
integrity.
neuropsychological
pfeparation
represents
adequate
If, on theotherhand,it is insisted universities
diagnoses.
will beoffered
by
conclusions
a[ionsdefinitive
psychological
diagfor
of
the
the
assumption
view
of
diagnosis
narrow
medical
that,
the
older
pediatricians,
parenLs,
etc.,
to
thepsychologist
performed
or
bypsychologists
thenwe submitthat an act be nosticfunctions
decisions
maderegarding is to prevail,
that will influence
that doesfit our con- psychiatrists.
andlicensed
placement,
theuseof a homestimula- recognized
hospital
of
ofthescope
isthedefini[ion
Letthisnewlyrecognized Thefollowing
of diagnosis.
ception
erc.
tionprogram,
"psychological
proposed:
prac[ice
Psychology
novi
for
but
diagnosis"',
act
be
termed
arefrequently
EXAMPLE
3: Psychologists
is the assessThepracticeof Psychology
that,it,shouldberecognized
0r theirattend- westronglybelieve
theirlawyers,
askedby clients,
[reatment
andpsychological
ment,prevention,
restricted
to
ac[,nol necessarily
as as a licensed
conclusions
ingphysician,
[o offerdefinitive
of behaviour
andmentaldisorders,
for harm diagnosis
dueb0the potential
extent,
and locusof brain psychologis[s,
bo the likelihood,
andtheenhancedysfunctions
and
conditions,
is
a
We
believe
this
[hat
exists
in
this
activi[y.
physical
illness.
injury
or
damagefollowing
physical,
psyof
intellectual,
ment
and
maintenance
new
legislation
if
necessary
of
componen[
may
influence
the
Suchdiagnostic
iudgments
functionsocialand interpersonal
in their practices emotional,
are [o continue
awardsmadet0 a clientby a courtandmay chologists
mg.
new
restraints
or
excluwithout
experiencing
or managethe natureof trea[ment
influence
physi- srons.
ment,prcgramsofferedby surgeons,
is used as the most generic
Overthelastrfewyears,theBoardof Exam- '"Psychologicaldiagnosis"
ciansor otherhealthprofessionals.
or "behavioralanalytermratherthan "psychOdiagnosis"
has
responsive
[o
iners
in
Psychology
been
are frequently
EXAMPLE
4: Psychologists
termswhichconsis of problems"or o[herpsychological
fromthe HealthProfes- veythe samegeneralmeaningsoughthere,but also have
in a widevariety the variousrequests
accepted
asexpertwitnesses
Review
for information,
ana- specificconnotationsthat will be minimizedhere.
sionsLegislation
Courtof
of courtactionsbeforethe Supreme
Webelieve
thatan objective
defini- lysisandopinion.
Ontario,
andassuchinvi[edto provide
and staff.
will iudgethem In additiont0 the BoardMembers
of our submissions
or client's appraisal
regarding
a patienb's
tivestatements
public
have
been
intercontributrons
[0
this
submission
for
0o
show
extraordinary
concern
its
and
orotheremotional
condition
depression
Bock.
andCarson
in content,
andexemplary
con- madebyBruceQuarrington
est,creativeness
severity.
PNACNCE
NCONPORATION
OFA PSYCHOLOG'ST'S
is t0
4.Theprincipal
of a corporation
business
by
business
cardsor anyotherdocuments
ACNON
DISCIPLINARY
practisepsychology
predominant
psywhen
the
r€pr€sent
themselves
as
which
they
and Dr.
0n MayB, 1987Dr. DavidJackson
partof its business
withinthe
is included
[0 thepublicinwhichthereisany
chologists
under
MartiSmyehavingcarriedon business
practice
psycholof
the
scope
of
of
definition
rcfercnce
lo
a
corporation;
profesname,werechargedwith
a corporate
published
provide
(4)They
fmm
time
to
time
by the
ogy
will
verification
of
compliance
underthe Psychologists
sionalmisconduct
Examiners
in
Psychology.
Ontario
Board
of
with
the
agreement;
Act.Theparticulars
of theallegaRegistration
offerstheservices
of a
5.Wherea corporation
and
[ionwerethat,theywereguiltyof professional
psychologist
publish
its
(5)The
as
an
adiunct
to
business,
Board
may
an
account
of
the
the
misconduct
in thattheyfailedto maintain
thatpsychologist
shallnotallowhisor her
in itsBulletin.
agreement
byincoroftheprofession
ofpractice
slandards
name
t0
be
used
as part of the corporate
poratingtheirpracticeof psychology
as Jackname
or
business
style
of thecorporation.
I
N
IDELI
N
ES
NESPECI
BOAND
G
GU
psychology
as
sonSmyeInc.andby practising
of the
The
Board
decided
that
thedefinition
INCONPORATION
Inc.
in
of
section
contravention
Smye
Jackson
practice
March
1967
of
set
ou[
in
its
30,
scope
in
numerous
haveappeared
Act,1982, Although
articles
C,orporations
3(1)of the Business
Health
Professions
Legislasubmission
to
the
of theproTheBulletinadvisingpsychologists
s.0.1982,C.4.
will beusedto satisfytherequirewas hibitionagainstincorporating
theirpractices, tionRevierv
10,1987anagreemen[
0n September
guideline
number4. Thisdefinition
ments
of
a set0fguidelines
to develop
Drs.Jackson
andSmyeand theBoarddecided
between
reached
reads
follows:
as
in Psychology. t0 furtherclarifitthe issuesfor psychologists.
Boardof Examiners
theOntario
of psychology
is the assessIle_pfq@Lcq
and Censeguefltly,
at-its rncetingofl\olember 18,
theeharges
@ithdrav
and
treatment
ofbehaviour
ment,
diagnosis
guideBoard
the
f0llowing
[he
1987
the
adopred
Drs. Jacksonand Smyeagreedt0 take
processes,
mental
research
andother
and
lines:
corrective
steps:
following
professional
performed
services
usually
by
hisor her
(1)Astheprincipals
shallincorporat€
SmyeInc.,they 1.Nopsychologist
ofJackson
psychologis[
purpose
in
Ontario
for
the
of
a
psychology.
practice
of
to be
nameofthatcorporation
willcausethe
and
understanding
behaviour
assessing
participate
psychologist
as
an
offiNo
shall
the
2.
not
include
name
that
does
changed
Loa
maladandmentalprocesses,
ameliorating
of a corporation
cer,directoror shareholder
names
Jackson
or Smye;
behaviour,
and
mainaptive
or
undesired
psyis to practise
(2)Fromthedateoftheagreement
business
theywillnot
whoseprincipal
physical,
taining
or
enhancing
the
intellecpsychology
practice
norwill
chology.
of
carryonthe
socialand interpersonal
nopsychologist tual, emotional,
ofpublication,
to [hepubl,c 3.Asofthedatre
theymakeanyrepresentation
groups
functioning
of
individuals,
ororganiof a corpoasanemployee
inconiuncshallparticipate
ofpsychology
asLotheirpractice
I
zations.
pracis Lo
rationwhoseprincipalbusiness
tionwithanycorporation;
(3)Theywill changeall invoices,
letlerhead, tisepsychology.
A NAMEFOR
SELECflNG
A PHUATE
PRACNCE
Theissueof bheuseof a tradenamefor a
psychologist's
practiceis relevan[
to the issue
ofincorpora[ion.
TheBoardtherefore
decided
it
wouldbeusefulboreprintthefollowing
article
in the July 1980
whichoriginallyappeared
issueof TheBulletin.
TheBoardof Bxaminers
hasbeenreferred
whichpsycholoto a numberof instanceSln
gistshaveselected
specialtitlesfor their
privatepractices,such as "lnstitutefor
. . .'l ftntre for . . .'l ". . . Clinic',
and
SOor; nameswhich may suggestthat
the practiceconstitutes
a largeandmixed
practitioners,
or
aggr€gate
of recognized
backing.
evensomekindof institutional
AppendixB, Section
2 of the Standards
of
Professional
stat€sthattitlesused
Conduct
in announcing
theirpracby psychologists
ticesmustbein thenameof theindividual
psychologist
or inthenameofa partnership
wherethereare actualor activepartners.
thatnamesotherthan
TheBoardconsiders
thoseof the practisingpsychologists
arr
misleading
to thepublic,
and
andconfusing
alsotendto obscurethe facttha[ it is an
psychologist,
whois responsible
individual
r
fortheconduct
of theprac[ice
UTS
FOR THE
PSYCH
OLOGI
CAL4SSESS'I4E
ORPROMUNON
PUNPOSE
OFSELECflON
by large
arefrequently
engaged
Psychologists
beingconsidtroassess
applicants
companies
Onepsyor promotion.
eredfor employment
has askedthe Boardt0 preparea
chologist
for
abouttherightof thecandidate,
sbatement
or promotion,
to seethe report
employment
bythepsychologist
abouthimorhersubmitted
to theemployer.
to havea
It is importantfor psychologists
of thenatureof theirproclearunderstanding
obligation
in situa[ions
ofthissort.In
fessional
in personnel
selection
the courseof assisting
psychologists
t0 be
mayperceive
thecompany
[o be
thecompany
theonlyclientandassisting
theironlyobligation.
standardsdo not
Althoughprofessional
of
theuniqueaspects
alwaysdirectlyaddress
psychological
in theareaof personnel
services
ConIhe Standardsof Professional
sefection,
of a client
ducrincludewithinthe definition
"thoseuserswhoaredircctrecipients
of psyandidentify"assessment
services'l
chological
as a "psyof individuals"
of the func[ioning
in conducting
I Therefore,
chological
service
for thepurposeof
of individuals
assessments
in hiringor promoting
assisting
a company
personnel,
must consider
the psychologist
to
as wellas theemployer,
theiobapplicant,
be a client[o whomhe or shehasa setof
obligations.
to obtain
Amongtheseis the obligation
Althoughthe candidate's
informedconsent.
maybe
willingness
to submittoanassessment
for employfor beingconsidered
a condition
thecandidate
hasa rightto
men[orpromotion,
andto giveor withhold
knowwhatis involved
themAlthough
theymaydisqualify
consent.
if theyrefuseconfmmthecompetition
selves
pr€rogative
and
sent,that is the candidates'
tn exercise
it.
theymustbepermitted
mustalsorespect
thecanThepsychologist
whatisbeingsaidabout
righttoreview
didates
of any
the release
himor herandto approve
a reportfor an employer
r€port.In preparing
with
is no[ communicating
the psychologist
and ther€for€cannol
anotherprofessional
for the
arguethat the rcportis too technical
It,is not clearthat
to understand.
candidate
argumentfor withthercis any supportable
r
fromthecandidarc.
holding
thisinformation
ETRA'VTS
ANENTNEG
NHTIPERM
of theBoardheldonJanuary
for registrationin | | ter at a meeting
The followingcandidates
Registo thePermanent
Onuriowercadmitted
| | 13,1988.
Allan,Michael
Madhia
Allison,
Atkinson,
Leslie
Bergevin,
Jean-Pierre
Margaret
Brigham,
Bur[on,Sharon
Ralph
Billingsley,
Zdenek
Cernovsky,
Dukoff,Stephen
Dyer,Ann
Kartn
Eamon,
Fidler,
Barbara
Freedman,
Sidney
Louisa
Gembora.
Graff,Rick
Marcia
Gragg,
Christine
Gudas.
Haber,MaryBeth
Anita
Halpern,
Hanson,
Karl
Ipp,Hazel
MaryAnn
Johnslon,
Kahill,Sophia
Arunima
Khanna,
Frances
Khanna,
Rosalinde
Klempan,
Nira
Kolers,
Lawson,
Kerry
Leiken.
Lovis
Vernon
Lediett,
Lieberman,lrwin
Lynch,Patrick
Miller,
JohnL
Frances
Owen.
Persi,
Joseph
Pohlman,
Cheryl
Ken
Reesor,
Gloria
Roberts,
Roller,
Diane
Ross,
Linda
Ryan,David
Molly
Shainfarber,
Jonathan
Siegel,
Gerald
Smith,
Smith,Wanda
Leon
Steiner,
Stovart,Dorothy
Sy,Michael
Lorna
Tbner,
Judith
Tbdiver,
Alastair
Younger,
REGETNA'UIS
PORANY
NEWTEM
1981
OfiIOBER,
S"UCE
Barbarafumstrong
Deborah
Baar
AlanBardikoff
PeterBarr€tt
SusanBerry
KeithBrov,rnlee
SusanBryant
Butler
Stephen
EdwardConnors
W Geoffrcy
Crealock
AnnCummings
Yolande
Cyr
Ramona
Domander
Anthony
Donohoe
PetraDuschner
MarkFerland
Flax
Michelle
Jospeh
Garber
RobertGates
Harling
Marsha
Eugene
Hewchuk
AntonKlarich
Peggy
Kleinplatz
Knight
Beverly-Mae
RuthKdrtz
Lafleche
Ginette
DebraLean
DonaldMaxwell
Mclister
Brenda
Jane[Munson
NitzaPerlman
BryanPhillips
Alexandra
Quittner
Reid
Gorden
HowardSchachter
Lawrence
Spreng
CherylThomas
Romeo
Vitelli
William
Winogron
Raymond
Yokubynas
EXAMINAT'O'US
ORAL
wereheldin lbrontoon
Theoralexaminations
11,12,13,
1988.Assisting
theBoard
January
wercthefoltheseexaminations
in conducting
lowingpsychologists:
Private
BOCK,
M.A.,Psychologist,
J.CARSON
Practice;
PH.D.,
Psychologis[,
Otbawa
ANNW CROLL,
Board;
School
Roman
Catholic
Separate
PH.D.,Dean,Facultyof
P.EDWARDS,
HBNRY
University
of Otbawa;
SocialSciences,
Provincial
Psychologist,
DIANEE{RR,PH.D.,
Centre
Guelph
Correctional
;
PH.D.,
Psychologist,
ROBERT
FLEWELLING,
0t[awaBoardof Education;
PH.D..
AssociaTe
ProfesLACROIX.
J.MICHABL
Psychological
C,onsultant,
sor,YorkUniversity;
Rehabilitation
Centre;Priva[e
Downsview
practice;
PH.D.,Chief,Department
of
JOHNMCGRORY,
Western
Hospital
Psychology,
Windsor
Centre;
MARTYJEAN MCKAYPH.D.,Independent
practice,
Psychologist
;
PH.D.,Professor,
BRUCEQUARRINGT'ON,
and C'onsulr,ant,
Department
of Psychology
Centre,York
and Development
Counselling
University;
(retired),
LAURAN. RICE,PH.D.,Professor
YorkUniversity;
Department,
of Psychology,
PH.D.,PsychoD0RISSUTHERLAND-ROCHE,
Private
Practice;
logist,
PH.D.,SeniorpsychoRICHARD
ROGBRS,
of Research,
logist,METFORS,
Co-ordinator
Institute
of Psychiatry;
Clarke
MALCOLM
ROSE,PH.D.,Staffpsychologist,
of
Cen[re,University
CardiacRehabilitation
Hear[Institute;
O[tawa
T. S0L0M0N,PH.D.,PsychoELIZABETH
Kingston
logist,Departmen[
of Psychology,
Professor,
DepartAssistant
Hospital;
General
University;
mento[ Psychology,
Queen's
PH.D.,ClinicalC,oJ.S.YARROW
CATHERTNE
Board,Psy'
Workers'
Compensation
ordinaton
PrivatePractice.
chological
Services,
I
THEBULLETIN
of theOntarioBoardof
TheBulletinis a publication
in Psychology.
Examiners
REGISTRAR
CHAIRMAN
BarbaraWand,Ph.D.
JamesE.Alcock,Ph.D.
SECRETARYTREASURERSTAFF
Ph.D.
SusanBrcoks
E.JuneRogers,
ConnieLearn
MEMBERS
AnisaJanmohamed
W Baugh,Ph.D.
Elspeth
'lbrcsaWestergaard
George
H. Phills,Ph.D.
Ph.D.
V.Marta'lbwnsend.
quarterly.SubscripTheBulletinis published
in
lionsfor Ontariopsychologists
arc included
theirr€gistration
feaOthersmaysubscribe
at
$10.00peryear,or $2.50persingleissueWe
will alsoattemptto satisfyrcquestsfor back
issuesof TheBulletinat thesameprice. r