Coaching for Success: Teaching & Learning Through RtI Gina M. Zugelder National Education Consultant www.devstu.org Session Goals • Discuss Response to Intervention (RtI) • Discuss the critical roles for reading/literacy coaches within the Problem-Solving process of RtI process • Consider and discuss my role in this process. Collaborative Partners • Introduce yourself to a partner/table. Discuss… • What enticed you to participate in this session. • What is your goal for attending this session? This conference? Where are you with RtI? 1. 2. 3. 4. Just heard of the innovation Beginning to gather information Know enough to try it out Fully implemented and working on making it better 5. Ready to work on helping others so that it becomes culturally embedded in our practice Response to Instruction & Interventions RtII is the practice of (1) providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and (2) using learning rate over time and level of performance to (3) make important educational decisions to guide instruction. National Association of State Directors of Special Education, 2005 Shifts in Practice • Focus on intervention not placement • Use of assessment to identify effective interventions • Base interventions on student need rather than label or diagnosis • Make decisions based on student outcome • Apply Problem-Solving/RtI fluidity Shifts in Focus “RtI seems like a better solution than that usually somewhat haphazard selections of supports. RtI tries to make sure that classroom teaching is “up to snuff” and that when students falter, there will be a rich, and ultimately, sufficient instructional response to his or her reading needs.” T. Shanahan, 2008 Paradigm Shift • Instead of this question: • What about students is causing the performance discrepancy? • This question: • What about the interaction of the curriculum, instruction, learners and learning environment should be altered so that the students will learn? How might this shift effect what is happening in your role as the coach? Multi-tiered Model ALL students receive Tier 1 services. The three tiers of service are stacked resources so that they are layered and aligned with each other. Tier I: Instruction and Support Tier I - Assessment Benchmark Assessment Universal Screening-District Curriculum-based Assessments Tier I - Core Instruction Whole-class Instruction Differentiated Instruction and Accommodations 10 ‐ 15% Good First Instruction • Developmentally appropriate • Comprehensive and balanced literacy program • Explicit instruction in different component areas of literacy at different developmental stages • Assessment that informs instruction • Extensive opportunities to read and write • Different materials, tasks and approaches accomplish different outcomes • Different text for different purposes • Instruction that is differentiated and responsive to student needs. Lipson & Wixson, 2010 Successful Tier One Instruction PK-12 • A successful RtI process begins with the highest quality classroom core instruction; that is, instruction that encompasses all areas of language and literacy as part of a coherent curriculum that is developmentally appropriate for preK-12 students and does not underestimate their potential for language and literacy learning. • This core instruction may or may not involve commercial programs and, in all cases, must be provided by an informed, competent classroom teacher. IRA Commission on RtI, 2010 Focus on the Big Picture Think about the long-term expectations or outcomes of your coaching. Ask yourself: • Are we providing them the strategies and dispositions necessary to be lifelong learners? • Are students communicating effectively through reading, writing, listening, speaking and viewing? • Are students becoming strategic, self-regulating learners? • Are students able to engage in self-assessment and selfreflection? • Do students know how to apply dispositions and strategies to other subject areas and to their lives? Tier II & Tier III: Intervention/Support Tier III: Individualized Interventions Academic Intervention Plan Individual Tutoring Intensive Intervention Services Tier III: Assessments Curriculum-based Assessments Progress Monitoring Graph/RtI (Eligibility Assessment) Tier II Assessments Curriculum-based Assessments Classroom Observations Intervention Data (peer group comparison) Tier I Assessments Discipline Data (ODR) Benchmark Assessment Universal Screening 80 ‐ 90% 10 ‐ 15% Tier II Targeted Interventions Targeted Group Interventions Differentiated Instruction & Small Groups to Increase Intensity and Duration (e.g., Tutoring, Supplemental Resources, etc.) Tier I Core Interventions School-wide Discipline Positive Behavior Supports Whole-class Interventions Key Design Features Tier 2 & Tier 3 • Begin an intervention plan. • Match reader and text level. • Dramatically expand reading activity. • Use very small groups or tutoring. • Coordinate intervention with core classroom instruction. • Deliver intervention by expert teacher. • Focus instruction on metacognition and meaning. • Use texts that are interesting to students. Allington , 2009 Interventions are… • Enhancements of the general education curriculum • Based on student’s performance on a variety of assessment and measures • Targeted to a particular skill or set of skills to improve student outcomes • Short-term, explicit instruction • Monitored frequently to document progress • Revised as necessary based on student performance Rhode Island Technical Assistance Project (RITAP) Intensity of Intervention Planning • Time and Response • Core Program Efficiency • Program Implementation • Group Size • Coordination of Program and Instruction Simmons, 2003 The Challenge Good enough is no longer good enough to get all students where they need to be. Karen James, 2008 • What can we do in our role to keep moving teachers so that they can be “good enough” instructionally to meet the need of our students? Literacy Coaches... play a critical role in Response to Intervention (RtI). • They often encourage teachers to reflect on instruction in small and large collaborative groups. • They support teachers in implementing instructional options for students who are at risk for learning to read and write. • They monitor student progress during instruction by observing student learning and evaluating student work. These are the aspects of RtI where literacy coaches can share leadership. Whether the goal is forming community, supporting teacher change, or monitoring student progress, the literacy coach works with the entire school to improve student learning. Walker, B, 2008 IRA Guiding Principles • Instruction – optimize language and literacy instruction • Responsive teaching and differentiation – differentiated and intensified instruction or intervention • Assessment - inform instruction • Collaboration – dynamic, positive and productive collaboration • Systematic and comprehensive approaches – instructional approaches to support all learners International Reading Association, 2009 Collaboration that is… • Deliberate • Intentional • Ongoing Collaboration – joining of forces, pooling resources, and sharing of expertise in order to meet shared goals for instruction and assessment. Ehren, B., Laster, B., & Watts-Taffe, S., 2009 The Collaborative Coaching Process • Coaches support teachers’ questions, concerns, needs during implementation of plans. • Coaches develop and use fidelity checklists that guide teachers in implementing the research-based instructional strategies. • Coaches identify additional resources, as needed. • Coaches collect, analyze, and share assessment data for continuous progress monitoring. • Coaches model demonstration lessons that serve as “training” on the job (job-embedded). Do something. If it works, do more of it. If it doesn't, do something else. - FDR Beliefs for effective RtI Programs • All students can learn. • One size does not fit all in learning. • Waiting for students to fail is not a good approach. • Research has value in guiding education. • Assessment is crucial to instruction. • Education is a partnership. • There is no quick fix. • The system will change only if I change. IRA Commission on RtI, 2010 Practices for effective RtI Programs • Teachers use sound instruction. • Options are offered to meet learning needs. • A committee or team coordinates supports. • A data management system exists. • Data are used to inform instruction. • Teachers, support personnel and administrators work together to meet the learning needs of all students. • Teachers and administrators participate in ongoing professional development. IRA Commission on RtI, 2010 Think About It This was probably due in part to the literacy coach who was available to the teacher in the regular classroom to help problem solve about each individual child on a biweekly basis. This coaching was a critical part of the intervention that needs greater scrutiny as the crucial mediator of the intervention effectiveness. Vernon-Feagans, Gallagher, Ginsberg, Amendum, Kainz, Rose, Burchinal, 2010 Reflect RtI holds the promise of ensuring that all children have access to high-quality instruction, and that struggling learners are identified, supported, and served early and effectively. - RtI Action Network, 2008 • What might be your next steps in the process? • What do you need in order to take the next steps? • What might be challenges to taking these steps? Questions, Comments, Reactions Gina M. Zugelder National Education Consultant [email protected]
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz