Women at the Top
- on women, sport and management
Second
sub-report:
Women
management – a comparative
international trends
in
sports
analysis of
Gertrud Pfister, Ulla Habermann, Laila Ottesen
“Women at the Top”
- on women, sport and management
Second sub-report: Women in sports management
- a comparative analysis of international trends
Gertrud Pfister, Ulla Habermann, Laila Ottesen
Institute for Exercise and Sport Sciences
University of Copenhagen
“Women at the Top” – on women, sport and management
Second sub-report: Women in sports management
– a comparative analysis of international trends
© Gertrud Pfister, Ulla Habermann, Laila Ottesen
Institute of Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Copenhagen 2004
Design & Layout: Allis Skovbjerg Jepsen
Institute of Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Copenhagen
Nørre Allé 51
DK-2200 Copenhagen N
Tel: +45 3532 0829
Fax: +45 3532 0870
E-mail: [email protected]
Web: www.ifi.ku.dk
The project has received support from
The Committee for Sports Research of the Ministry of Culture and
the Mainstreaming Project of the Ministry of Culture.
Contents
!"
"
$ %
!
)
%)
.
/%0
0
%
2
&!
'(
) (
'
0
%)
#
#
*
+,
++
+1
+*
!
2)
,,
3"
,-
3
4
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
Introduction
!
7 6
%
45
)
4
6
"
8
$
4
4
' 7
"
.
)
)
) "
"
4
7
)
+## ( )
)
)
+*99
( +*+,
) (
+*,# " $ :
")
"
7
4 "
6" :
) 7(
7
'5
76 )
;
<
"
2
$ (
' ")
"
)
=
)
"7 ( "
)
$ "
)
)
)
)
.
)
4 6
+* +*1
4
4 '4 " ) (
+*#9
7
' (
+** " 4
+*#)
)
"
,999 %
+*#9(
4 ,
"
)
)
( +**
>
"
)
4 7
()
)
)
-9
"
+**
+** ( +#1 !
"
6
;
<6
)
(
)
) 7
.
4 : 7( ) 7 " 7( 4 4 7 (
'5
7$
4
"
7
?
)
@)
()
;
<
"
")
4 ""
)
0
7
"
"
)
)
(
)
4
"
7 )
)
)
4
"
"
" "
@)
(
4
&
'
" )
"
)
)
"
7
"
A
@
2$ ) ,99>
" ) 7) )
)
2 ' 74
"
7
6
)
@ 4
5
$
7
:$
'
4 "
"
"
" "
"
)
7
4
7
$
4( ) )
4
4
(
(
4
4
4
)
)
7
@)
(
"
4
(
7
"
4 '7
4
"
$ )
4
4
477 (
5
7
"
)
4
7
'(
)
"
5
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
IOC (The International Olympic Committee) and
NOCs (The National Olympic Committees)
$
( B
)
)
.
@)
+#*
7
(
4
B
( )
'
4
)
7
)
) )
"
$
7
"
"
"
0
)
"
"
"
4
+*99 6
"
,999 B
7
7 )
4
(
(
7 )
)
2
' 74
C
7
(
)
+*#+
" )
4
@ 77
( C
(
C
4 )
)
B
77
7)
+** (
7
:
4
4 ,99 0
(
"
"
6
"
4
2C
(
"
( D =
7
(
2
4
7
+9
"
4
)
6
)
5
+** ( 1
"+91
2*9
' 74
"
""
,999
,9
6
!
"
@)
:
+,
3 ,(
(
4
4 ( ++ )
7
7
(
)
)
#
+
7
#1
7
,99+
(7
7
6 "
Figure 1: Members of the IOC (2000)
Women
Men
+
%
) 4 7
&
E
E
)))
+9
,99>8
"
7E 'E 7
,999( >>
E
6
E
)
E
:F '
(
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
" ) 7
"+, )
7
)
++"
%
6
+>
)
0"
6.
4 7( %)
2
"
"
&1
)
8
+)
&+
)
)
(
"
,999
"
-,
"
,99,
)
@)
(
4 7( )
"
;
3
,99>
J
"
"
:
4
.
(
0
G:
7
B
)
"
+**
2
)
""
4
&+1
&,>
-)
4 '
)
4
@)
( :
0
)
,99>
)
(
G
'
G
"
%
2G
7
" )
0
+)
8
(
"
:
"
"
0
:
7
4
$
C
,99
)
)
<
)
4
7 0
:
)
#
7
"
H % I 4 ,99>( ,
" )
"
G:
B
(
7
:
"
)
8
7-99
,
7(
,999
7
"+9
.
7
%
''
"
)
7
5
"
"
7
)
;
4)
<
7
( "
(
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
Women’s Leadership Positions in Different
Countries
" ) 7
'
7 7
"
"
7
"
$
) ")
"
"
"
7
:
"
"
<
"
);
"
)
7
<
; :
7
"
"
"
(
:
)
)
(
7
"
"
" 4
"
7 (
"
"
)
:
)
(7
(
"
$
"
""
(
"
"
"
)
7
B )(
:
)
)
"
"
7
)
?
B
"
6
7
"
"
7
) 4
"
"
" 7
)
(4 )
7
"
:
"
(
$
?
4
"7
"
()
4
(
"
"
" )
7
4
7 7
4
"
4 7
"
"
4
The Scandinavian Countries: Denmark, Norway, and Sweden
0
4
C
4
%
"
7( 4
")
(
.
:
%
7
4)
)
"
E
%
'(
4
) (
'
)
(
( ) "
G
5
7
!
%)
:
4
7
) "
4
2
7
?
( ) 7
%
-96 9
6 )
7 :
) ')
7
?
)
7
"
"
!
"%
)
7
4)
)
B
)
0G
"
"
!
"
) ' . ' A!
44
4 "
) "
)
4 "
"
7)
) '
"
8
+**
'
:
%
)
%)
)
/K
+**
0
"
"
%
=
"
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
Table 1: Volunteers within sport as well as social and health work in some
European countries (per cent)
Sweden
Denmark
UK
Germany
Sport
40
48
20
28
Social/health
14
13
35
36
Source: Euro-Vol-studien, Gaskin & Davies Smith, 1995
!"
"
)
4)
>92-9
"
) '$
)
'
4
0 ' AK 2
+** 8J
.
A%
4 7
+***8
4L'( %
A
,9998.
0
,99, $
" .
)
"
"
)
"
"
4
)
)
7
7)
7
:
"
M
,999( ,>"
"
8B
(
47A 3
4
,999( , "
(
4
4
"
.
4)
+1
>#
"
G7
-#2 9
. ' A
!
%
+**
%
) ' !
'
"
"
!
'B
)
"
"
7
" ) ')
% (
"
"
$
%
@4
,9998B ' ,99,8$
AK5 7
,99>8.
0
,99,
Denmark
$
4
!
!
"%
)
*
?
#
"
7
4
"
C
?
)
!
,
%
"
@)
+
4 6
,99> >,
4 "
7+*
)
6
)
( )
)
,
"
4
)
3
*
)
" 7
7
0
)
'
4
(
7
"
"
7
"
)
"%
3
" +* -( +*1 ( +*#1(
+**#( )
4 " 4
" %
3
.
L N5'
>
7
7
"
7
( -,
%C
4
3
9
4
"
" %
7
%C
(
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
)
7
,99,
2
7
"
C
4
7 7
"
")
>,
+**#
>,99>
Figure 2: Leaders in the executive committees of Danish sports associations
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Co
mm
it t e
e
Sp
ec
DIF
ial
me
as
so
mb
cia
ers
t io
ns
com
DG
mi
tt e
Ie
es
xe
cu
tive
co
mm
itte
e
DG
Im
DF
em
IF
be
exe
rs
cu
t ive
co
mm
it te
e
DF
IF
me
mb
ers
0
Men
DI
F
exe
cut
ive
Women
N=
!
'
DIF members = 1.6 mill; executive committee = 10
Special associations leaders = 339
DGI members = 1.3 mill; executive committee = 9
DFIF members 340,000; executive committee = 6
"
'
4
7 6
B
(
7 "
+*- 6 )
>
$
.
7"
)
7
(!C
'
,
(
7
!
0
+*9> ( )
+**,
7
"
? "
7
%
7
)
7
& &
(
$)
( *+6 "
+#*
"
4 "
4
7
!
'
)
( +6 "
+**,> 6 )
$ '
*
)
(**+6 "
) '
4 (
(
$
70
+*99
+# +
O
5
4)
10
!
)
7
"
"
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
)(+
( 2 "
)
45
7
4 $!
"
4
C
7
"
4?
,99>(
)
7
"
"
4 0
4
7
!
"!
(
:+
+*# (
!C
: >,#(999
4 ( !. + >
!CC
4 $
7
4 "
4
4 7
4
"
$
4
7+-(999
$
"
) '"
4 " "
7
)
)
?
4 "
4 '
4
"
: 7
)
)
6
$
?
6
:
'
2 ' 7
" 7
$
"
2 ' 7
6
)
42
$
")
!CC 9
7
C '
E
4
!C :
)
)
4 6
477
6
)
7
"
)
4
4
"
( +-
)
'
>
A "
,99>
"
"
)
4 :
(4
:
)
"
(" :
)
( )
"
7
9
(
)
()
'
?
() "
#-
->
7
9
7
)
7
' 7 ;
<) '
A "
,99>8@ 4
A
)
:
":
:
"4 7
"
"
)
(
!. ,,
+>
42
"
(
"
")
)
@4
2
""
+9
4
C
1
"
)
"
(
@4
(
,99-
Table 2: Female representation in presidencies, leadership positions and
among members in the three Danish sports federations (per cent).
-
$
Female presidents
Female voluntary leaders
Female members
DIF
12
22
39
DGI
36
42
47
DFIF
6
17
31
"
"
"
"
11
))) '
'E) --
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
Norway
)
",
7 "
(4
4
7
7
0
(
+(#> (999
'
4 "
" 4
"
4
+***
+,(,-,
4
(
)
)
4
4
7
"
(
?
$
7
4
4
7
) 7
"
"%
%
B
(
%
"+* 7
()
4
7
7
" )
0
( 1
"
"
"
7
)
% B+**1
) "
"
7 +
1*
P#1+
'
"
) '
"
(
)
") "
"
4)
)
0
" +**1
)
) 7 )
4
)
0
7
)
#
)
) ')
4 "
)
,
B
'A D 74N
+**# 0
:
7
)
%N7Q
,999( - $
"
"
4)
7
4
' (
)
( )
)
'
7
4
)
+***
%
-- (-9# "
4
7 +1
4
6
4 "
4 )
) 1* ( >9 $
)
>
"
4
"
%
0
3
+***( >- $ ?
"
7
")
"
7
")
R
' 7 ;
<)
2 ' 74
(
+*#1 $
'
%
'
"7
?
7
)
7
+**9
) "
"
$
(
" ) &
&
'
.
/
'
$
%
$
7
4?
) ( S,2""
)
" 4
4
%0
@
3
:
C
+*# 6 +**#
"
+***
)
"
"
" (
4
: ""
12
"
"
"
" ) &
&
"
(
("?
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
$
4
+
")
>9
"
>
( +**#&>#
"
"
2 ' 74
"
)
"
4
$
"
,999
"
)
)
"
,999&>,
)
) &+*# &
?
6
7
"
4
")
+**# )
""
>*
7
Table 2: Female representation in boards at different levels within organised
sports from 1985 to 1998 (per cent)
Organisational level
1985
1990
1994
1998
Olympic Committee
36
38
27
38
Special federations
15
22
24
30
Local associations
30
43
42
38
@)
( ")
) "
6
;7
"
<
) '
(
" 1
2
7
)
'
(
%0
3
0
)
"
,99,
?
(
7
"
7
)
0
)
) 7
)
1
+**> )
)
"
4
7
;7
(
) 7 0
) " "
"
7
$
"
)
$
"
,999 "
)
) "
+*
+**>(
$
(
"
; 7<
"
4
""
)
)
4 )
"
"
7
4
7
6
+**+( )
4 '
"
6
"
") )
4 :
6
:
"
""
6
+1
")
"
7
")
"
"
,999( +1
0
7
"
7
?
6" +
)
)
) "
0
"
<
( " :
(
"
7
C
( )
"
(
C 4 0
"
)
) 7
4 :
4
"
4
"
)
13
7
6
)
) 7
(
) (
)
5
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
Sweden
%)
(
:
6 +*
1
"
4
"
) ')
- 9(999
)
'
"
7
"
" )
)
B
7(
)
)
)
)
"
" )
) 'D 7
,99>8J
.
A%
4 7,99+
$
4
)
" 7
)
4 (
"
" 6 :
"
$
67
"
"
6
7 "
7
%)
"" %)
)
4 "
6
>#
"
G
7 )
4
,9 >9
7)
)
(
4
"
7
()
)
"
"
"
:
2 ' 7
)
%)
( 3'
"
T4
3C 6
%)
%
"
6
1
"
,+
"
"
"
1
"
()
'
-"
4 (
4
""
:
)
"
,"4
4 ( ,9
"
4 (
>"
4 0
7 4
) "
+
)
@4
,99- @ )
(
)
6
" +*#9
+9
"4
)
)
"
+*#*
"
)
"
7
6 ->
"
'
4 )
7
"
) 4 7
4 ,99>
0
4
"
6 ,99+
")
4
)
>>
@)
(
*
"
)
3C
,99,8@ 4
,99$
7
4
"
%)
( 3'
G:
" %)
%
"
4 6"
")
)
7
""
4
"
)
@
(
4
5
)
"
( +**
)
) )
:
4 7A
"
+**
"
Table 3: Distribution of voluntary leadership positions in Swedish sport
Total
Women
Women (per cent)
Sports Confederation
213
52
24.4
67 specialised federations
3302
611
18.5
21 district federations
275
112
43
Total
3014
793
26.3
(
:
"
"
4)
'4 0
,
":
4)
)
)
2
14
":
' 7
7
"
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
)
"
2
)
(
(7
4 ( ?
4 ( )
4 0
:
:
"
"
"
)
)
"
"
>#
)
7
4
4
)
9
:
"
"
"
67
#>
#
*
7
7
"
4)
"
"
"
'
->
6
C
4
4
4
9
Germany
'
%
) '$
"
%
"
$
7
(
4
+
"
"
".
"
:
"
"
.
!%B !
7
7
4
%
4
6
.
"
4
" 4
(
4 7 7
$
$
(
()
(
"
( "
)
4
( "
"
"
Figure 3: Members of Germany’s sports federations
100
90
80
70
60
Women
50
Men
40
30
20
10
0
DSB
DTB
DFB
DSB = German Sports Confederation (25 millions)
DTB = German Gymnastics Association (5 millions)
DFB = German Football Association (6 millions)
$ !%B
4 "
$
( )
.
.
:
(
,
7 "
"
0
4
6 >*
4)
19
"
")
)
.
E
7
"
(
15
"
E
4
.
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
C
4
0
*9
7
"
"
$
7
")
,1
.
!%B
7
2
4 "
"
")
E
4
>1
"
U4 7
4
:
4
)
4
)
4
)
$
)
2 ' 7
)
:
(
(
) "
!%B $
4)
6"
$
7
;)
4
")
,99- ) "
;G
<
" )
")
.
""
)
2" =
<$
:
&
(
"
!%B
4
"
)
+9
,, " "
:
4 ' 4 (" 4 (
"
Figure 4: Leaders in German sports federations
90
80
70
60
50
Women
40
Men
30
20
10
0
DSB
SportFed
RegFed
DSB executive board has 11 members
SportFed = 55 sports federations
RegFed = 16 sports federations in the lands
+
"
4)
',99>
.
.
5
")
7
+,
0
-9
( )
2
)
"
4)
7
7
")
:
6)
7 ",9
"
A
4)
'" :
19
"
(
' 74
+**#( ,">>,
"
+*** )
")
) >
">999
16
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
4
;
7
$ 7
7 7
<)
)
" )
4
4 " )
(
)
6"
"
4
=
'
4 " "
"
"
4 "
"
(
USA
$
7
/%0
4
.
$
%
" ( ) )
:
"
" 4
( )
) 0
"
4
7
/%0)
7
"
4
C (
7
(
7
; 7 <
()
O 0( )
)
)
76 7
7
"
%
7
(
7
(
)
"
)
" 4
"
"
" "
7
" 4 (
4 (
7
"
"
' )
"
0
6
4 '4 (
(
$
"
)
2
"
00/ 0
0
/
()
4
7
" #
"
(
00
7 0
0
(
2
" 7
()
+,99
7
7
"
"
"
"
00/ )
7 :
4
$ "
7
(
"
16
"
6 2
"
"
0
7
("
7
+*19 $
7
;$
V< +*1, 6
37 0 "
+* - )
4
"
"
C
4 "
)
7
"
)
7
$
"
4
@)
(
7 ) 7
4 ")
7
7" ;$
V<
,99>(
:
>
"
7
#
7 )
)
)
00( ?
4)
)
4
7
7
+**9 $
00
7 4 ) 2
8
:
"
6+
)
()
7" "
) '* 0
:
()
" 00
(
)
>*
',99>( ,+
1
("
' (
7E: E E
F
7
,99>3
' 4
G
%
(/
"
&
E
E
)))
7 + +9,99>
&
E
E
)))
#$
:
!
*
(
(
"R 4
/%
+, "
C
(
17
7
!P+,
7
2
3
7
"
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
Figure 5: Leaders in the NCAA member federations
90
80
70
60
50
CEO
AD
FAR
40
30
20
10
0
Men %
Women %
CEO = Chief Executive Officer, N = 172
AD = Athletic Director, N = 179
FAR = Faculties Athletic Representative, N = 216
G:
!
0
% 7
7
"
!
00
6
"
"
$
!
)
4 "
6
+
+1
)
)
)
"
)
0
7
"
7 0
7 "
)
>9
7
7
-
"
)
)
0
6
7
(
$
4
18
4
" )
")
)
(
4
"
(
(
C
"
7
"
2
)
>
)
!
)
)
4
" " 4
4
!
(
)
+9!
7
"
!
+9 0
"
7
)
47
7 (
!
C (
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
4 '4
7 (
7 %
B '4 0
( B0 (
'
@ '
4 4
5
7 B 4 (
B
7 "
5
(
%
"
7
4 '4
B '4 0
(
B0 $
"
)
7 )
4
,99>
'" 4
'"
$
7
"
"
7
)
4 7
"
6
5
$
)
6)
4 4
4 '4
)
(
7)
"" 4
'
(
)
*
0
7
" "
7 )
"
+99
"
+9,
"
7
4
$
4
,,(
"
" 9
+
4 '4
',99>( >1
(
"
7
)
00
"
"
7
")
7
0
7
7
)
7
4 '7
4 '
)
7"
7
$
00
7
)
"
"
"
7
7
? "
'
,99>
Australia
0
<
)
<
7 " 7
7
7
)
0
(
0
0
45
7
E7
;
(
6
B
(
7
0
7
(
0
0
)
2
77
$
"
"
)
"
)
7
7
"
"%
B
$ 0
( )
) '
) '
'
0
0
7
"4 )
7
E 7
<
(
)
76
E.
&
" @
(
%
"
0
)
4
"
"
( %
(
G
19
3
7
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
Figure 6: Leaders in Australian sports federations
100
90
80
70
60
Men
50
Women
40
30
20
10
Leaders in
sports for the
disabled
Coaches
Presidents
Leaders in elite
sports
0
Coaches N = 77
Presidents N = 128
Leaders, elite sports N = 33
Leaders, sports for the disabled N = 21
0
(
4
"
7
5
"
7 7
"
"
7
@)
"
>>
4
"
4 ( )
0
&- >
) ' ,999 $
6
:
++
"
)
)
www.abs.gov.au
' !
'
4
"
"
"
"
,
"
-
0
(
(
"
4
(
&
) '
'
5
"
) "
7
""
"
+>
"
)
20
"
)
)
7
)
"
)
7
4
D
+#
4
4 " "
7
B
7
G
/%0(
0
4
'
)
9
"
7
(
7
"
,-
*
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
"
)
)
,
)
0
% I 4 ,99,( *
)
7
"
7
4
)
,*
)
>+
(
)
B
)
"%
?
%
(
&
"
H
)
7
4
*1
"
")
C
7
"
"+- 4
>9
5
Figure 7: Leaders in Australia’s Sports Committee
100
90
80
70
60
Women
50
Men
40
30
20
10
0
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Leaders 1999
Level 1 N = 14
Level 2 N = 97
Level 3 N = 118
Employees N = 109
21
Employee
*
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
Sports Associations as Male Domains
- a worldwide phenomenon
!
7
( )
7 "
:
4
4
++
0
)
"
A@
2$ ) ,99>
) & C
*
"
"
A@
2$ ) ,99>
%
"
7A%
,99>
4
7
)
"
"
) ) ) (
7
4
4)
)
'
(
4
'(
)
)
' 4
)
=
7 7
,99+ G
7 ) "
(
4
)
7
C (
4 '
4)
"
"
4
"
"
%
(
4 "
"
B
(
E:
"
"
7
"
"
7 7 (
)
" '
"
"
C
(
"
"
4
4
4 )
":
!
"
7
7
7
"
"
)
)
4
" )
4
"
"
4)
%)
)
"7
?
!
(
)
7
)
"
0
"
"
"
"
?
"7
(
"
" R0
4
7
6
) (
)
4
E
)
;7
; <
)
++
0
@
?
)
)
?
(
)
)
) "7
2$ )
;$
(
" 7
4
7
" )
?
)
)
)
(
2
R
4
7
.
"
7)
<)
7
4
4
7 "
=
R
(0
)
5 $
4
)
7
4
5
;B 7
?
7
7< 4
.
22
""
" R
6
7
7)
!
'
+*#9 6 4
7
7
!
< "+**- )
)
"
"
4
4"
"
H% I 4
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
@)
(
) '
) ' 77
&G
(
0
%
)"
;7
4 )
;7
)
+,
%
"
)
' 7.
G
%
7
7
'
7<
7<
=
4
7
"
" .
4
$
'
47
"
?
)
" "
$ "
'
+**- )
"
+,
)
()
4
7
(
4
B
$
"
)
4
))) )727 7EE
47
)))
E
@G% E
4' E
)))
4= 4=E
)
4
'
%
"
)
7
7
B7
( /K"
4
" )
"
"
' 7.
7) 0 G%.
E
%
%
23
2#
%
7
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
References
0 ' ( J AK 2
(
7
%C
B
( K(
47( 3 A 3
+** &(
0 ( KN4
&%
" '2
* &
>
4 ( $ ,999&' $
1
2
!
&J
D 7
3 KN4
&%
" ' 7
%C
B '( J ,99, &
9,&
,
B
'( . AD 74N(
+**# &4 $
$ $
$
$
5
67895
66:
& 7
"4
7
'K
4 7( A
" ( G +** &1 $
%
$
;
$
$
$ C
3' T " 4
!
(
A@
2$ ) (
,99> &%
"
)
C
&@
2$ ) ( A " ( . &'
'
192#,
&3
7
C
( G ,999&
7)
<
( C 42
( ,*2
>,
. ' ( K A!
%
( J +** &,
1
=,
&D
( /K
.
0
( J ,99, &!
'
7
"
7
77L
4 L7
(
+*1*2,999 & ''
(C
&/ 3
$
*
$ $
$
(
$>
2
? +*#2,,# W
&0
/
" 7
@4
( / ,999&
"
7 6"
7
L "
7
KN4
&
"
L ( KN4
/
@4
( / ,99- & K
Q
6 '
'
K I77 7
%'T
" ' 7
7G
A%'T
@T7'
@4
(/A
,99- &
7'
L
( $'
$ & L 7'N 5
8, ( , 2>*
@4
( /(
( A " ( . ,99> &@
A
%
$
3
$ (
B@ 3
KN4
&
"
L(
KN4
/
J
.
( G A%
4 7(
+*** &
4 7 '
7
7
"
T"
T
7
&0 Q(G
C
+,+2
+#9 % '
&C =
% /+***&
#J
.
( G A%
4 7(
,99+ &C
7
' I"
I 6
4 '
'7
I
&%' @
' ( A 4 (B
&*
%
$
$
0
12#
&
/
" 7
'(
3
,99> &
3
7
&
E
E
)))
7E7
24
Women in Sports Management – a comparative analysis of international trends
( K ,99> & 3
3
(
$W
&K E C
''
( B ,99> &
7 7
7 &% 5 0
(J
&D
EFFE +1
"
H% I 4 (
(K
%
2
"
,99> &
*
*G
'
1
H
!H
"
&
"
H% I 4
" ( G +*#* &I $
=(
$
;
$
5
6FF9
/ Q&
77 '
( /
/
" ( . +*** &
RC
$ 2
%
4) 7 7
&K H7 (
@ 7&
-,2
%
"
&@ "
" ( . ,999&
.
&! ')
( B @ 7&
'
>2+*
:" &B ')
" ( . A @
2$ ) (
,99> &
&
(
&@
2$ ) (
A " ( . &'
'
+2
+&3
7
" (. A
'( % ,99> &
*G
'
5'4
4
B
7(
A%
( % ,99> &
%
%
&@
2$ ) ( A
" ( . &'
'
#>2
+9+
&3
7
3C%
' ,99, &K
I
,99, 3'
"
T4
(
C
(%
7
%N7Q ( 0J( BN( K( K 7 (
AJ 4 ( BK ,999&G
'
'
6
4 7
"
R
$
& $ J3
E7+,9( >->*2>-$
( AK5 7
( $K ,99> &*
$
( $
3 $
$ W
& 7
7
D7 ( J
,99> & *;
'
HC C
$
$
$
% '
&%
'
4 Q
"
T Q
3
*#
+** &$
%
"
&
+*1,2+** <
K
1
'
1 , ( +#>2+*,
(
,99+ &/ $
2
.
&
4
"
" E
4L'( ! ( %
( A
= ( @ ,999&*
'
0
$
L$
B 7 &C 74 '" 7
M
( J ,999&.
' 6C ) 7
4 (
$I 7'
4H7
"2
G 77
4
I
C
B
"
HC
(%
(C
J7
C ) 7 G 77
!
6C ) 7
D >
+> 2+- %
7 (B
( KT &
K
25
Q
&