System x Power Development IBM x3850 X5 Energy Efficiency Leadership Ted Howard 5/4/2011 System x Power Development x3850 X5 Energy Efficiency Leadership x3850 Has Demonstrated Leadership With Energy Consumption and Efficiency Performance Over The Predecessor Product and Major Competitors Summarize Power Hardware That Helped Enable This Differentiation Discuss System Implementation, Design Challenges and Tradeoffs, and Supplier Interaction Provide Comparison Data 2 5/4/2011 System x Power Development x3850 X5: Internal view • Scalable 4-socket 4U server • 8, 6, or 4-core Intel Xeon 7500 CPU’s • 64 Dimms, 1066MHz DDR3 • 8 HD’s, or 2 eXFlash Packs • 7 PCIe Gen2 slots • 2 PS’s 3U (1975W / 875W) • 6 Fan’s Scalable •x3850 4U + MAX5 1U Î 96 Dimms •8-socket, x3850 4U + x3850 4U 3 5/4/2011 System x Power Development eX5 is the top performer for business critical applications x3850 X5 TPC-C: #1 highest ever 4-socket score TPC-H: #1 world record price performance #1 highest ever 4-socket score SPECvirt: #1 world record score with 8S SPECjEnterprise: #1 single node x86 SAP-SD: #1 8-socket score Top Performance Across Enterprise Workloads 4 5/4/2011 System x Power Development Power Subsystem Design Focus Cost Space Requirements Non-Competitive 5 Competitive Efficiency (Schedule) Leadership 5/4/2011 System x Power Development Ghidorah Power Subsystem Power Supply – 1975W / 875W (230Vac / 115Vac) – 3U Form factor (120mm H x 125mm W x 200mm L) • Density 15.5W/cuin (Useable Space) – Rear Access, Orthogonal Docking – System 120mm Fan Embedded – N+N = 2 PS (Redundant at High Line) – Single Main 12V Output (162A / 72A dc) • Auxiliary Voltages (3.3Vco 200mA and 5Vco 300mA) – C13/14 AC Inlet – Equivalent Cost $/W To Athena 6 5/4/2011 System x Power Development 7 5/4/2011 System x Power Development Ghidorah Comparison PS Efficiency - Comparison to Athena Efficiency (%) 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Load (%) 1440W 8 1975W 5/4/2011 System x Power Development Ghidorah Power Subsystem Power Supply PS Design • • • • • Optimized Efficiency For Redundant Operating Range Focused For Significant Improvement At Light Load (10A to 30A) Dual Secondary Converters, Shedding One At Light Load Reduces Bulk Voltage At Light Load Reduced No Load PS ‘On’ Power By 59%, 44W Î 18W Enhanced Light Load / Operating Load Efficiency • • • 9 10% Load, +16% Eff. Improvement Over Athena 20% Load, +6% Eff. Over Athena 30% Load, +4% Eff. Over Athena 5/4/2011 System x Power Development Ghidorah Power Subsystem Power Supply – Allowed System To Reduce Fan Count To 6 Total, Less Than Other System Competitors – 230V Efficiency Load (Avg of 50 PS's) – 115V Efficiency (Avg of 50 PS's) 10 Load 10% 20% 50% 100% Peak 40% 91.7 93.7 94.1 91.9 94.1% 10% 20% 45% Peak 25% 89.8 92.1 90.6 92.1% 5/4/2011 System x Power Development 11 5/4/2011 System x Power Development 12 5/4/2011 System x Power Development Ghidorah Power Subsystem Ghidorah CPU Vcore Efficiency - Peak 92.1% CPU Vcore Regulator Efficiency EffInd 95 93 Efficiency (%) 91 89 87 85 83 81 79 77 75 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Io A) 13 5/4/2011 System x Power Development Ghidorah Power Subsystem Ghidorah CPU Vcache Efficiency - Peak 92.2% CPU3_Vcache Regulator Efficiency Pass4 EffInd3.3VPowMsrd 95 93 91 Efficiency (%) 89 87 85 83 81 79 77 75 0.000 10.000 20.000 30.000 40.000 50.000 60.000 Io A) 14 5/4/2011 System x Power Development Ghidorah Power Subsystem Ghidorah Memory VDimm Efficiency - Peak 92.8% (SIT) 95.00% 90.00% Efficiency 85.00% 80.00% Grimlock 3 Phase Grimlock 2 Phases 75.00% 70.00% 65.00% 60.00% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Load Current(A) 15 5/4/2011 System x Power Development Ghidorah Power Subsystem Voltage DC/DC Regulators - Improved Efficiencies Ghidorah Over Athena – Memory Vddq (At 1.5V) • +5% Over Athena At 1.8V, 92.8% Å 88% • Additionally Optimized At Operating Range, Light Load – CPU Vcore (At 1.2V) • +4% Over Athena, 92.1% Å 88% • Additionally Optimize At Operating Range, Light Load • Resolved Space Challenges – Developed New Inductor 220nH In 11mmx7mm Footprint For Ghidorah Space Limitations – Added Holes In I/O Planar To Accommodate Heat Sink • PCB Etch Added To Minimize Distribution Loss, and Efficiency Loss – Implemented Static Phase Shedding • MEM Vddq 3ph Î 2ph Based On Type and Number of Dimm’s • CPU Vcore PSI# (CPU’s 2, 3, 4) Voltage Regulators – Significant Cost Improvements Over Athena 16 5/4/2011 System x Power Development Willingness of Suppliers To Improve / Brainstorm / Partnership Significantly Improved PS Efficiency Pass2 BBFV Æ Pass4 SIT Resolved PS Mechanical Challenge – Telescopic Connector – Hard Work, Multiple Passes Significantly Improved PS No-Load ‘On’ Wattage Added Static Phase Shedding for CPUVcore and MemVddq, (Late At SIT Pass4) Moved From Pass1 Coupled Inductor To Discrete Inductor, w/Slower Fsw Selected Technologies (Topologies) Significantly Improved Over Predecessor Product Defined Targeted Operating Points and Tradeoffs For Peak Efficiency 17 5/4/2011 System x Power Development Base System IDLE Power Comparisons Ghidorah Athena 2x130W CPUs, 4x2GB Dimms 2x130W CPUs, 8x2GB Dimms – 211Wac 2x95W CPUs, 8x2GB Dimms – 218Wac Base Configuration 2CPU Idle (95W/105W/130W) – 210-218Wac – 373Wac 2x80W CPUs, 8x2GB Dimms – 378Wac 1x80W CPU, 8x2GB Dimms – 347Wac 160Wac Reduction - Base System Idle 2CPU Operating Cost Savings 18 • 160Wac x 24Hrs x 365 Days x 1/1000 = 1402kWh/Yr Î $140/Yr (at $0.10/kWh) • Data Center Total Savings x2 Î $280/Yr 5/4/2011 System x Power Development PS Efficiency Comparison To Competition Efficiency (%) 2PS IBM / 4PS Competitor 'A' For 2000W System Load (Fully Redundant) 100 90 80 70 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Load (%) 'A' 1200W Platinum • • • 19 IBM 1975W 'A' 1200W Silver IBM PS/System Better At Idle and Operating Load Range Penalty For 4PS Scalability Significant Disadvantage For Silver PS 5/4/2011 100 System x Power Development PS Efficiency Comparison – IBM vs. Competitor ‘A’ Efficiency (%) 1PS Efficiency Comparison To Each Individual Max. Design Load 100 95 90 85 80 75 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Load (%) 'A' 1200W Platinum • • 20 IBM 1975W 'A' 1200W Silver IBM PS Design More Optimized At Light Load, and Redundant Operating Range Below 50% PS Load, Compared To Competitor A’s Best Competitor ‘A’ Offers High Efficient and Low Efficient PS Option 5/4/2011 System x Power Development PS Efficiency Comparison Efficiency (%) 1PS Efficiency Comparison To 1200W System Load 100 95 90 85 80 75 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Load (%) 'A' 1200W Platinum • 21 IBM 1975W 'A' 1200W Silver IBM 1975W Performance Equivalent Over 1200W System Load Range, To Competitor A’s Best, Even With Larger Capacity 5/4/2011 System x Power Development System Consumption – Medium Configuration AC Wattage 4x130W CPUs, 32x16Gb Memory Dimms 1300 1100 900 700 500 300 1194 1141 1106 579 1093 658 530 526 Idle 2PS/1PS MpX 2PS/1PS Idle 4PS/2PS MpX 4PS/2PS System Configuration 'A' Silver 1200W • • • 22 IBM 1975W Significant IBM Advantage Across All Configurations, Compared To Competitor ‘A’ Silver PS (Delivered With Our System) Idle Savings (53W – 128W) Operating MPx (35W – 101W) 5/4/2011 System x Power Development System Consumption – Light Configuration AC Wattage 4x95W CPUs, 8x4Gb Memory Dimms 800 598 600 430 400 673 553 553 517 391 380 200 Idle 2PS/1PS MpX 2PS/1PS Idle 4PS/2PS MpX 4PS/2PS Configuration 'A' Silver 1200W • • • 23 IBM 1975W Significant IBM Advantage Across All Configurations, Compared To Silver PS (Delivered With Our System) Idle Savings (50W – 126W) Operating MPx (45W – 120W) 5/4/2011 System x Power Development Energy Efficiency / Consumption Leadership PS Efficiency Leadership System Power Consumption Leadership Significant Reduction In System Idle Power DC/DC Memory and CPU Power Consumption Leadership Resultant Estimated Customer Operating Savings – Comparing 2PS IBM / 4PS Silver Competitor (Most Common Redundant Configuration) • 125Wac x 24Hrs x 365 Days x 1/1000 = 1095kWh/Yr Î $110 / Yr • Data Center Savings x2 – Significant Idle Power Savings (160W) From Athena 24 Î $220 / Yr Î $280 / Yr 5/4/2011 System x Power Development Acknowledgements: Trung Nguyen - Power Procurement Nick Celenza - Power Development Kevin Linen - Power Development DongHong Li - Power Development Ellis O’Neal - Power Development Dipak Tailor - Power Development Ted Howard - Power Development Alfred Burress - Mgr. Power Development Michelle Brunk - Marketing 25 5/4/2011 System x Power Development Ghidorah Power Subsystem Questions or Discussion? Thank You Ted Howard [email protected] (919)254-2611 26 5/4/2011
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz