Health and Safety Executive Baggage handling in the UK Sarah Tapley HM Specialist Inspector (Ergonomics) EAGOSH May 2010 HSE baggage handling What we know about the risks Bigger picture and influences Technologies HSE’ s journey EAGOSH May 2010 Manual handling definition Manual handling definition Picking up and putting down Carrying and Pushing and pulling EAGOSH May 2010 Risk factors for manual handling injury The load The weight of the load, its size, shape, stability and grip. The task The postures adopted (twisting, stooping and reaching), repetition, duration of the activity and carrying distance. The environment The space available to move, floor condition, changes in levels and weather conditions. The individual The capability and characteristics of the operator, level of knowledge and experience, underlying health problems. Psychosocial factors aspects of work design such as how much control people have in their jobs and the support they receive from supervisors / co-workers EAGOSH May 2010 Risk factors for manual handling injury in baggage handling The load Bags, sports equipment,cargo,GSE The task The postures adopted,kneeling,twisting, stooping and reaching), repetition, push/pull and carrying distance. The environment Cramped inside the hold, access to hold,temperature, The individual The capability and characteristics of the operator, level of knowledge and experience, underlying health problems. Psychosocial factors Turnaround times, staff levels, EAGOSH May 2010 HSE baggage handling Kneeling and handling is a special case: Increased and different spinal loading Increased anterior-posterior and lateral shear force within spine (Yang et al 2005) Increased MSD and reduced strength (Gallagher 2005) 45% annual prevalence for knee problems (Andersson 1984), 30% reporting knee pain (Kaiser et al 2006) EAGOSH May 2010 Bag weights TU activity around bag weights IATA 23kg single bag limit in AHM Wide variety carrier allowances eg 32kg combined EAGOSH May 2010 Bag weights Average European weight suggested as 15kg in 1986 Surveys in UK similar in 2007 Average 17kg 90% below 23kg Over 50% between 16kg and 20kg EAGOSH May 2010 HSE baggage handling Baggage handling is completely mechanised Check in conveyor Sorting systems and conveyors Lateral belt/carousel Barrows Tugs Containers Belt loaders Bag reclaim and the Aircraft EAGOSH May 2010 HSE baggage handling EAGOSH May 2010 Bag pathway •Bag pathway –Ticket sales –Bag sales –Check in –Bag hall –Ramp –Aircraft –Reclaim EAGOSH May 2010 Baggage pathway No single owner of bag pathway Need good communication and cooperation Clearly shows need for joined up ergonomic approach EAGOSH May 2010 Challenges Challenges International activity Competitive market Short contracts Turnaround times Labour Different regulators/inspections Silo working Spheres of influence [Culvenor (2007)] EAGOSH May 2010 Baggage pathway New technologies EAGOSH May 2010 New technology Extending Belt Loaders (EBL’ s) Rampsnake Powerstow Mongoose Mallaghan RTT Longreach/sliding carpet combination FMC Rampsnake FMC Rampsnake Powerstow Mongoose Mallaghan RTT Longreach –Telair Sliding Carpet - Telair EAGOSH May 2010 HSE Baggage handling Background in the UK 4.7 million days lost back problems 4.6 million days lost ULD’ s over 50% all incidents from aviation sector related to back incidents EAGOSH May 2010 HSE baggage handling Know that bag handling as a whole is a high risk activity Ramp handling element is the main problem area Internal handling element worst Lack of robust guidance EAGOSH May 2010 HSE baggage handling Defining MH risks project 2004 Established risk factors Discussions with industry Joined up research EMA Project 2007/08 IOSH event More discussions with industry EAGOSH May 2010 HSE baggage handling Baggage handling project aims Joined up industry/HSE project Update lit review Identify key MSD risks Provide comment on new technology EAGOSH May 2010 HSE baggage handling Typical tasks Manually positioning passenger steps Moving marker cones Moving baggage carts Offload/onload baggage Pushback EAGOSH May 2010 HSE baggage handling Key MSD risks Push/pull equipment Handling inside the hold-stacking Frequency and weight of bags Handling range-below knee/above shoulders Handling with hands far from the low back EAGOSH May 2010 HSE baggage handling Handling methods Direct from cart Using belt loader Mallaghan LBT90 Flat bed lorry No companies using EBL at present EAGOSH May 2010 HSE baggage handling Key findings EBL significantly reduces MSD risks Mechanical means reduce risk Manual movement of GSE is high risk and should be avoided Risk reduction and control for other ancillary MH operations should be explored Suitable access and egress should be identified and provided Active joined up working by all parties EAGOSH May 2010 HSE baggage handling Management issues CAP 642 and HSG 209 Co-operation and co-ordination H&S responsibility can not be contracted out Contracts Turnaround times EAGOSH May 2010 HSE baggage handling Design issues Equipment Airports Interface Aircraft EAGOSH May 2010 HSE baggage handling Next steps Produce guidance for Inspectors Planned inspection/enforcement project Join up links between handlers/airlines and airports EAGOSH May 2010 HSE baggage handling Inspection project Letter to companies Planned inspections to airpotrs in London/South East area SIM to be published EAGOSH May 2010 HSE baggage handling International issue Needs a joined up ergonomic approach Effective communication and cooperation with all parties involved EAGOSH May 2010 HSE baggage handling Thank You
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz