PROGRAM REVIEW – ACCESS BY EQUITY 2015‐2016 Instructional Program Review ‐ Effectiveness AccessbyEquityData&AnalysisTableofContents
NarrativeTrendsandAnalysis
 Trends by gender  Trends by age  Trends by ethnicity  Trends by disability  Trends by economic disadvantage  Trends by veteran  Trends by foster youth DataChartsandTables
(1 page per semester for each area where data are available) 





Department profile – Fall 2014 Department profile comparison – Fall 2014 Headcount by gender Headcount by age Headcount by ethnicity Headcount by economic disadvantage DataNotes



Ethnicity groups differ from success and retention data. These data include a “Two or more races” category. Intersession data are included with Spring data in these analyses. Economic Disadvantage was defined as those receiving a BOG waiver, which is awarded based on financial need. PROGRAM REVIEW – ACCESS BY EQUITY GROUPS 2015‐2016 Department: Culinary Arts Trends ‐ GENDER In fall 2014, the Culinary Arts Department was composed of 52.0% females and 46.0% males. Compared to the overall OCC population, the department had 5.1% more females and ‐5.0% fewer males than the college as a whole. Four‐year trends indicate female headcount in the Culinary Arts Department has decreased since fall 2011 by ‐2.9% and male headcount has increased by 4.9%. Spring headcount trends over the past four years are similar—female headcount has decreased by ‐0.9% and male headcount has increased by 1.3%. Summer trends follow a similar pattern to the primary semesters. Trends ‐ AGE The majority of students in the Culinary Arts Department in fall 2014 were 20 to 24 years old (40.7%). The smallest percentage of students enrolled in the department were students 35 years or older (15.7%). Compared to the overall OCC population, the department enrolled older students than the college as a whole. Over the past four years, this headcount pattern has remained consistent. The groups with the largest change in headcount over the past four years was students ages 35 or older (increased in headcount) and students less than 20 years old (decreased in headcount). Trends – ETHNICITY White students comprised the majority of students (33.9%) in the Culinary Arts Department in fall 2014. The smallest percentage of students enrolled in the department were American Indian/Alaska Native students (0.4%) and Black/African‐
American students (2.0%). Compared to the overall OCC population, the department enrolled slightly more diverse students than the college as a whole. Over the past four years, this headcount pattern has remained consistent. The group with the largest change in headcount over the past four years was White students, which has decreased in this time period. Trends – DISABILITY Of the students enrolled in the Culinary Arts Department in fall 2014, 6.5% were students with a disability. The overall OCC population of students with a disability was 3.6% in fall 2014, a difference of 2.9% from the department headcount. Because of the small sample size of students with disabilities at OCC, four‐year trends are not presented. Trends – ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGE The Culinary Arts Department enrolled 56.9% students who were economically disadvantaged in fall 2014. Overall at OCC, disadvantaged students made up 53.0% of the population in fall 2014, a 3.9% difference compared to the department percentage. Four‐year trends indicate disadvantaged student headcount in the Culinary Arts department has increased since fall 2011 by 16.5%. Spring and summer four‐year trends followed a similar pattern. Trends – VETERAN In fall 2014, the Culinary Arts Department enrolled 0.8% veterans. Compared to the overall OCC population, the department had ‐0.9% fewer veterans than the college as a whole. Because of the small sample size of the OCC veteran population, four‐year trends are not presented. Trends – FOSTER YOUTH The Culinary Arts Department had 1.2% foster youth students enrolled in fall 2014. The percent of foster youth enrolled in the department was smaller compared to the overall OCC population by ‐0.5%. Because of the small sample size of the OCC foster youth population, four‐year trends are not presented. Prepared by: Office of Institutional Effectiveness PROGRAM REVIEW - ACCESS BY EQUITY GROUPS
2015-2016
Department: CA
Gender
Department Profile - Fall 2014
Unreported
2.0%
Male
46.0%
52.0%
Female
0%
20%
Age
35 or Older
25 to 34
20 to 24
Ethnicity
Disability
100%
40.7%
17.7%
Unknown
Two or More Races
White
Hispanic
Black
Asian
American Indian
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
60%
80%
100%
4.0%
12.9%
33.9%
27.8%
2.0%
19.0%
0.4%
0%
20%
40%
No Disability
93.5%
Disability
6.5%
0%
Economic
Disadvantage
80%
25.8%
0%
Veteran
60%
15.7%
Less than 20
20%
40%
Not Disadvantaged
60%
80%
100%
80%
100%
43.1%
Disadvantaged
56.9%
0%
20%
40%
60%
Non Veteran
99.2%
Veteran
0.8%
0%
Foster Youth
40%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Non Foster Youth
100%
98.8%
Foster Youth
1.2%
0%
Prepared by: Office of Institutional Effectiveness
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Source: Student Characteristics Cube as of 8/14/2015
Male
Unre
Age
Less
20 to
25 to
35 o
Ethn
Ame
Asia
Blac
Hisp
Whi
Two
Unk
Disa
Disa
No D
Econ
Disa
Not
Vete
Vete
Non
Fost
Fost
Non
9.2%
PROGRAM REVIEW - ACCESS BY EQUITY GROUPS
2015-2016
Department: CA
Department Profile Comparison - Fall 2014
Totals
Total Unduplicated Headcount
Department
OCC Population
Sum of Enrolled
248
21,930
52.0%
46.0%
2.0%
46.9%
51.0%
2.1%
5.1%
-5.0%
-0.1%
17.7%
40.7%
25.8%
15.7%
30.0%
41.5%
18.8%
9.6%
-12.3%
-0.8%
7.0%
6.1%
0.4%
19.0%
2.0%
27.8%
33.9%
12.9%
4.0%
0.3%
21.6%
1.6%
21.9%
34.0%
15.3%
5.2%
0.1%
-2.6%
0.4%
5.9%
-0.2%
-2.4%
-1.2%
6.5%
93.5%
3.6%
96.4%
2.9%
-2.9%
56.9%
43.1%
53.0%
47.0%
3.9%
-3.9%
0.8%
99.2%
1.7%
98.3%
-0.9%
0.9%
1.2%
98.8%
1.7%
98.3%
-0.5%
0.5%
Gender
Female
Male
Unreported
Age
Less than 20
20 to 24
25 to 34
35 or Older
Ethnicity
American Indian
Asian
Black
Hispanic
White
Two or More Races
Unknown
Disability
Disability
No Disability
Economic Disadvantage1
Disadvantaged
Not Disadvantaged
Veteran
Veteran
Non Veteran
Foster Youth
Foster Youth
Non Foster Youth
% Difference
Source: Student Characteristics Cube as of 8/14/2015
1
Economic Disadvantage was defined as those receiving a BOG waiver, which is awarded based on financial need.
Note: American Indian includes Native Alaskan; Asian includes Filipino and Pacific Islander; Black includes African-American.
Prepared by: Office of Institutional Effectiveness
Source: Student Characteristics Cube as of 8/14/2015
PROGRAM REVIEW - ACCESS BY EQUITY GROUPS
2015-2016
Department: CA
Fall Headcount by Gender
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2011-12
2012-13
Female
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Change
Prepared by: Office of Institutional Effectiveness
Female
54.9%
54.3%
55.1%
52.0%
-2.9%
2013-14
Male
2014-15
Unreported
Male
41.1%
41.3%
39.1%
46.0%
4.9%
Unreported
4.0%
4.3%
5.9%
2.0%
-1.9%
Source: Student Characteristics Cube as of 8/14/2015
PROGRAM REVIEW - ACCESS BY EQUITY GROUPS
2015-2016
Department: CA
Spring Headcount by Gender
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2011-12
2012-13
Female
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Change
Prepared by: Office of Institutional Effectiveness
Female
55.4%
57.9%
54.4%
54.4%
-0.9%
2013-14
Male
2014-15
Unreported
Male
42.0%
38.1%
42.8%
43.3%
1.3%
Unreported
2.6%
4.0%
2.8%
2.2%
-0.4%
Source: Student Characteristics Cube as of 8/14/2015
PROGRAM REVIEW - ACCESS BY EQUITY GROUPS
2015-2016
Department: CA
Fall Headcount
Summer
Headcountby
byGender
Gender
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2011-12
2012-13
Female
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Change
Prepared by: Office of Institutional Effectiveness
Female
0.0%
0.0%
48.1%
42.9%
-5.3%
2013-14
Male
2014-15
Unreported
Male
0.0%
0.0%
44.4%
52.4%
7.9%
Unreported
0.0%
0.0%
7.4%
4.8%
-2.6%
Source: Student Characteristics Cube as of 8/14/2015
PROGRAM REVIEW - ACCESS BY EQUITY GROUPS
2015-2016
Department: CA
Fall Headcount by Age
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2011-12
2012-13
Less than 20
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Change
Prepared by: Office of Institutional Effectiveness
2013-14
20 to 24
Less than 20
21.3%
18.7%
18.0%
17.7%
-3.6%
-1.0%
-0.2%
25 to 34
20 to 24
40.7%
47.0%
45.7%
40.7%
0.0%
-6.2%
-5.0%
2014-15
35 or Older
25 to 34
26.5%
21.3%
22.3%
25.8%
-0.7%
4.5%
3.5%
35 or Older
11.5%
13.0%
14.1%
15.7%
4.3%
2.7%
1.7%
Source: Student Characteristics Cube as of 8/14/2015
PROGRAM REVIEW - ACCESS BY EQUITY GROUPS
2015-2016
Department: CA
Spring Headcount by Age
100%
90%
Fall
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2011-12
2012-13
Less than 20
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Change
Prepared by: Office of Institutional Effectiveness
Less than 20
19.0%
19.4%
12.7%
14.4%
-4.5%
-5.0%
1.7%
2013-14
20 to 24
25 to 34
20 to 24
45.4%
45.6%
46.6%
42.6%
-2.8%
-3.0%
-4.1%
2014-15
35 or Older
25 to 34
24.2%
21.0%
26.5%
25.6%
1.4%
4.5%
-0.9%
35 or Older
11.5%
13.9%
14.1%
17.4%
5.9%
3.5%
3.3%
Source: Student Characteristics Cube as of 8/14/2015
PROGRAM REVIEW - ACCESS BY EQUITY GROUPS
2015-2016
Department: CA
Summer Headcount by Age
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2011-12
2012-13
Less than 20
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Change
Prepared by: Office of Institutional Effectiveness
2013-14
20 to 24
Less than 20
0.0%
0.0%
25.9%
4.8%
-21.2%
-21.2%
-21.2%
25 to 34
20 to 24
0.0%
0.0%
44.4%
38.1%
-6.3%
-6.3%
-6.3%
2014-15
35 or Older
25 to 34
0.0%
0.0%
18.5%
47.6%
29.1%
29.1%
29.1%
35 or Older
0.0%
0.0%
11.1%
9.5%
-1.6%
-1.6%
-1.6%
Source: Student Characteristics Cube as of 8/14/2015
PROGRAM REVIEW - ACCESS BY EQUITY GROUPS
2015-2016
Department: CA
Fall Headcount by Ethnicity
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2011-12
2012-13
American Indian
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Change
American
Indian
1.2%
0.4%
0.0%
0.4%
-0.8%
Asian
2013-14
Black
Asian
18.2%
17.8%
19.1%
19.0%
0.8%
Hispanic
Black
2.0%
1.7%
1.6%
2.0%
0.0%
Unknown
White
Hispanic Unknown
20.2%
4.3%
22.6%
4.3%
27.3%
5.1%
27.8%
4.0%
7.7%
-0.3%
2014-15
Two+ Races
White
44.3%
43.0%
31.6%
33.9%
-10.4%
Two+
Races
9.9%
10.0%
15.2%
12.9%
3.0%
Note: American Indian includes Native Alaskan; Asian includes Filipino and Pacific
Islander; Black includes African-American.
Prepared by: Office of Institutional Effectiveness
Source: Student Characteristics Cube as of 8/14/2015
PROGRAM REVIEW - ACCESS BY EQUITY GROUPS
2015-2016
Department: CA
Spring Headcount by Ethnicity
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2011-12
2012-13
American Indian
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Change
American
Indian
1.5%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
-1.5%
Asian
2013-14
Black
Asian
18.6%
19.0%
18.7%
14.4%
-4.1%
Hispanic
Black
2.2%
1.2%
1.4%
0.7%
-1.5%
Unknown
2014-15
White
Hispanic Unknown
21.6%
2.6%
24.6%
3.6%
24.0%
3.9%
27.8%
6.3%
6.2%
3.7%
Two+ Races
White
45.7%
38.9%
40.3%
35.6%
-10.2%
Two+
Races
7.8%
12.3%
11.7%
15.2%
7.4%
Note: American Indian includes Native Alaskan; Asian includes Filipino and Pacific
Islander; Black includes African-American.
Prepared by: Office of Institutional Effectiveness
Source: Student Characteristics Cube as of 8/14/2015
PROGRAM REVIEW - ACCESS BY EQUITY GROUPS
2015-2016
Department: CA
Fall Headcount
by Ethnicity
Summer
Headcount
by Ethnicity
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2011-12
2012-13
American Indian
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Change
American
Indian
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Asian
2013-14
Black
Asian
0.0%
0.0%
14.8%
14.3%
-0.5%
Hispanic
Black
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Unknown
2014-15
White
Hispanic Unknown
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
18.5%
3.7%
23.8%
0.0%
5.3%
-3.7%
Two+ Races
White
0.0%
0.0%
48.1%
52.4%
4.2%
Two+
Races
0.0%
0.0%
14.8%
9.5%
-5.3%
Note: American Indian includes Native Alaskan; Asian includes Filipino and Pacific
Islander; Black includes African-American.
Prepared by: Office of Institutional Effectiveness
Source: Student Characteristics Cube as of 8/14/2015
PROGRAM REVIEW - ACCESS BY EQUITY GROUPS
2015-2016
Department: CA
Fall Headcount by Economic Disadvantage
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2011-12
2012-13
Disadvantaged
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Change
Prepared by: Office of Institutional Effectiveness
Disadvantaged
40.3%
39.1%
48.0%
56.9%
16.5%
2013-14
2014-15
Not Disadvantaged
Not Disadvantaged
59.7%
60.9%
52.0%
43.1%
-16.5%
Source: Student Characteristics Cube as of 8/14/2015
PROGRAM REVIEW - ACCESS BY EQUITY GROUPS
2015-2016
Department: CA
Spring Headcount by Economic Disadvantage
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2011-12
2012-13
Disadvantaged
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Change
Prepared by: Office of Institutional Effectiveness
Disadvantaged
43.9%
44.4%
48.1%
52.6%
8.7%
2013-14
2014-15
Not Disadvantaged
Not Disadvantaged
56.1%
55.6%
51.9%
47.4%
-8.7%
Source: Student Characteristics Cube as of 8/14/2015
PROGRAM REVIEW - ACCESS BY EQUITY GROUPS
2015-2016
Department: CA
Fall Headcount
by by
Economic
Disadvantage
Summer
Headcount
Economic
Disadvantage
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2011-12
2012-13
Disadvantaged
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Change
Prepared by: Office of Institutional Effectiveness
Disadvantaged
0.0%
0.0%
44.4%
61.9%
17.5%
2013-14
2014-15
Not Disadvantaged
Not Disadvantaged
0.0%
0.0%
55.6%
38.1%
-17.5%
Source: Student Characteristics Cube as of 8/14/2015