PROTONS FOR BREAKFAST AUTUMN 2013 WEEK 3 HEAT 1 This is what you said on the feedback forms in Week 2 You said… Michael said… Great presentation again – You are welcome. Thinking about your comment – it thank you. Somehow it seems to apply to the scientific description of the world seems so logical yet so in general! complicated. Absolutely amazing – I’m so glad I I am glad you are enjoying it: I hope you can brought my son to the lectures. tell that I enjoy it too. Physics is indeed Physics is so exciting!!! exciting. What do you think is I really don’t have a clue! My guess is that it will be going to be the next something biological, but I would love it to be something to scientific breakthrough? help us make energy without polluting the atmosphere. Thanks, another You are welcome great week. Yes: well observed. I think you will have seen something like Why, when this: looking through the special specs, were there 2 With blue nearest to the middle and red the furthest away. The ‘rainbows’? I basic reason is that the spectra are created by inference tried closing one between light which goes one way around the lines on the eye and then the glasses and light which goes the other way around the lines. For other, which example, made no the bright red lights on the far left and far right are difference – created by the constructive interference (adding up) of light there were still with a wavelength around 0.0007 millimetres. 2 mirror image the bright blue lights towards the middle are created by the ‘rainbows’ constructive interference (adding up) of light with a (spectra?) either wavelength around 0.0004 millimetres. side of the light By the way the glasses are available from here: http://www.rainbowsymphonystore.com/digrglli500l.html# source….. You talk about It is important to understand that ’colour’ is a human sensation i.e. the colour it is something we experience. So I think your question can be spectrum but translated as: how do we see What spectrum of frequencies of light elicits the experience we white light and call ‘white’? white objects? ‘White’ is what we experience when the three types of cone in our eyes are roughly equally stimulated. There are many ways this can be achieved e.g. with three specific frequencies of light or with a wide range of frequencies. 2 You said… What is the coldest place on Earth? How old are you? What is an atom? Michael said… That’s the homework! I can’t tell you now! And anyway, you didn’t clarify if that was the coldest naturally-occurring place on Earth, or the coldest man-made experiment? I am 53.875 years old. An atom is a tiny particle from which all the substances on Earth are composed. There are about 100 different types of atom. Thank you! You are welcome I had never understood They are very unspectacular – just a tower with a wire. about radio and TV Read about the Radio 4 transmitter here: waves – please could we see a photo of one of the towers for radio wave? How is a spectrum ‘owned’ by certain bodies, who has the right to sell it and why? Will that be the same in space – once we can travel to planets and inhabit them will we have a new imperial age? (Lady Gaga to have her own planet for concerts?!) courtesy of Virgin Galactica. - I loved the powers of ten video and have had it at breakfast several times. Yes please a spectrometer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droitwich_Transmitting_Station For mobile phone frequencies, the companies pay the government money to enforce laws that stop anyone else using those particular frequencies. This allows (for example) Vodafone to run a mobile phone business without interference from another company, or other pieces of technology. We will have an expert from Vodafone here in Week 5 and you can ask him. It is a nice idea, but in fact human beings are tied symbiotically to the surface of this one planet. It is highly unlikely that humans can exist for extended periods i.e. centuries - away from the surface of the Earth, at least not without supplies of energy or food from the Earth. I hope you borrowed one. The odd asymmetric shape means that you look at light on only one side of the bright central light that you saw with the diffraction glasses. 3 You said… I love it. Where do you find the songs Can someone make a new colour. This is so useful for physics revision. Thank you. Michael said… Great. Details of the songs are here: http://protonsforbreakfast.wordpress.com/songs/ This page has details of the artists involved and contains links to the iTunes store. Mmmm. What a profound question. Your visual system can present you with a bewilderingly large number of colour sensations. We already have names for the general types of sensation: red, green, light blue, dark orange, pinky-purple etc. Is there an un-used colour sensation that could be named and ‘discovered’? I guess it’s possible! I am glad – and relieved - it is useful as well as enjoyable 4 You said… 1022 tops out but what of BLUE SHIFTS. 1 Hertz = 1 wave/sec. What’s below 1 Hertz. Do you get 1/10th, 1/100th etc. of a Hertz? Do these waves have names/uses? One wave a week! What’s the slowest wave we can currently detect? I think the learning value of the wave experiment is worth impaling the jelly babies! Michael said… This article has a review of ‘cosmic rays’: http://protonsforbreakfast.wordpress.com/2011/05/16/cosmicadventure/ And this article describes the latest results from the alpha magnetic spectrometer: http://protonsforbreakfast.wordpress.com/2013/04/07/cosmic-rayssurprise-us-again/ As I think I mentioned, it gets harder and harder to make high frequency waves because a charged particle has to be accelerated at an ever greater rate which requires bigger and bigger forces. To make a wave with a frequency of 1015 hertz the forces on electrons on the outer parts of an atom are large enough. To emit Xrays requires larger forces which are experienced by the inner electron shells of heavy atoms. Gamma rays (of which more in Week 6) come from the nucleus itself. Here protons (which are ~2000 times heavier than electrons) must be accelerated by the combined effects of electricity and the immensely powerful strong force. And we just don’t know how to get stronger forces than this! Blue shifts occur when the object which emits the radiation is heading towards us when it emits the light. This could affect the frequency in an extreme case by perhaps a factor of two or three – but I don’t think it could increase the frequency by a whole factor of 10 – but I could be wrong! Red shifts occur when the object which emits the radiation is heading away from us when it emits the light. As we look out into the Universe almost everything seems seem st obe receding from us. Red shifts of visible light by factors up to about 8 have been observed Yes Extra Low Frequency (ELF) and Ultra Low Frequency (ULF) waves do exist and can be measured. However these waves are everywhere all the time and so they are difficult to detect against the ever-changing background electric fields. Additionally if you wanted to encode the wave to send a message by (say) changing the frequency, it would take a very long time! By ‘slowest’ I think you mean lowest frequency. All electromagnetic waves travel in a vacuum with the same speed – the speed of light! I think we can detect very very low frequencies, certainly milli-hertz, but I think there are not many applications where this is considered useful. I am glad you considered their sacrifice worthwhile: because there will be further impaling in Week 5. I like watching the Gherkinator. Enjoyed talk, it reinforced the work we did on the same topic in school 3 weeks ago. Much clearer now. 5 And I enjoy firing it up! Wow – this course might be relevant to school work! You said… Why do LED lights use less energy than traditional filament or fluorescent ones? Michael said… It is difficult to describe exactly, but roughly: Traditional incandescent bulbs electrically heat a fine tungsten filament to get it ‘hot’. We then rely on random high-frequency electronic jiggling to produce light. For normal bulbs about 2% of the electrical energy emerges as light. For Tungsten-Halogen bulbs (in which the filament can be heated to a higher temperature) this can reach 4%. The rest of the energy is emitted as heat – which is OK if that energy then heats your home or office – but not OK if you then need to cool your office more! The challenge is to engineer the oscillations that emit light in a way that is less chaotic – so that a bigger fraction of the incident energy emerges as light. Inside a fluorescent tube is mercury vapour. First a ‘spark’ is struck in the gas and when the atoms of mercury are struck by electrons they vibrate and emit characteristic frequencies of light: these were the striking intense bands of colour you could see with the ‘diffraction grating glasses’. Also the atoms emit ultraviolet light which is absorbed in a coating on the inside of the tube. This then fluoresces (hence the name) and emits visible light with a wide range of frequencies. Inside an LED light is an LED (obviously!) which stands for lightemitting diode. This is a device which consists of a junction between two types of semiconductor – in the junction region electronic charges can be induced to oscillate in a highly efficient manner with approximately a single frequency. Changing the semiconductor material changes the emission from infra-red, to red, to green, to blue, to ultra violet. To make a white light one can either have: o three colours of LED – red, green, and blue – or o more commonly we coat a blue or ultraviolet LED with a phosphor which emits at a wide range of frequencies just like in a fluorescent light. This is absolutely rubbish! JUST KIDDING! Lots The idea that you should realise you of fun, really entertaining and helped me realise know more than you thought you did I know a lot more than I thought I did. Thanks! is heartwarming. GCSEs here I come! 6 You said… Very good. Enjoyed it a lot. Learning lots from this! What medium does light need to travel through? Michael said… Great Light (obviously) needs a ‘transparent’ medium. But what does ‘transparent’ mean? Vacuum Well light (and radio waves, X-rays etc.) can travel through a vacuum i.e. a region with no atoms. So this tells us something about the nature of ‘empty’ space. Gases Visible light can travel reasonably well through most gases but ultraviolet light sets the outer electrons vibrating too strongly and is absorbed and then re-mitted – a process called scattering. Infrared light is absorbed and the scattered by the motion of whole atoms within molecules. Solids Most solids thicker than about 0.001 mmm are opaque to visible light, but surprisingly light can actually travel through some solid materials. These ‘transparent’ materials are all electrical insulators and are typically crystals, although normal glass is not crystalline. In solids there is a high density of electric charge, but in some specific arrangements of atoms and molecules, the vibrations of the electrons in the outer orbits of atoms are not converted into atomic vibrations i.e. heat, but instead re-radiate the wave ‘intact’. All the wave proceeds in tact it is considerably slowed – light travels through glass with only about two thirds the speed with which it travels in vacuum. Thank you, very interesting? I learnt a lot. What is the distance We call the nearest star Proxima Centurae and it between earth and the is measured to be about 4.23 light years away. nearest star? Travelling at the speed of our fastest man-made How far can a radio wave object (about 140,000 km per hour or 39 km per travel? second!) it would take more than 32,000 years to Thoroughly enjoyed this reach the star. week. Very informative. Will http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nearest_stars definitely help with my We don’t know of any limit to how far a radio wave physics school work. Keep up can travel – we have detected radio waves that the good experiments being were emitted 300,000 years after the big bank – fun to interact as well. i.e. more than 13 billion years ago. Thanks 7 You said… Michael said… Can you include Einstein said this Einstein’s “You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You explanation of pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. ‘How radio Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly the same wave works’. way: You send signals here, they receive them there. The only Please. Thanks. difference is that there is no cat.” Is the light Is sound from a football crowd the same as sound from a band from a fire of flute players? Well yes, it is still sound but has quite a the same light different character. The sound from a football crowd consists from a laser? of lots of individual noises which add chaotically together. In a Thank you, I flute band, the individual tones are pure notes and each flute found this plays the same sound. lecture on Similarly, light from a flame and light from a laser are both light waves in the electric field i.e. light. The light from a flame is fascinating! chaotic in that the emissions from each atom are independent of each other. In a laser, atoms emit light in synchronisation with each other yielding a ‘pure tone’ i.e. a single frequency of light. You are welcome Is colour blind a Please see the explanation below. I hesitate to use the word fault in perception ‘fault’ because I know several friends who have different colour or receptors in the vision in each eye! In some people it is a ‘problem’ of which they eye? would have no consciousness without being ‘diagnosed’ by a doctor. What part of Radio telescopes are ’listening’ to radio emissions from stars the and galaxies in the same way that visible light telescopes are electromagnetic ‘seeing’ visible light emissions. In general visible light only spectrum are comes from hot objects but radio telescopes can see cooler radio telescopes objects. Also radio waves can travel through some kinds of investigating and dust clouds and allow us to see objects that are hidden to what sort of visible light telescopes. information are The telescopes listen at a wide range of frequencies from a they gathering? few MHz up hundreds of GHz in the microwave part of the spectrum. http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/research/ You can read through this web site about Jodrell Bank Radio Telescope in Cheshire. To me the site is spectacularly uninformative, but it has nice pictures. 8 You said… Michael said… Based on the Yes. In normal colour vision, light stimulates three different theory, colour types of so-called ‘cone’ cells in the retina of our eyes. We blind is just a generally call these cells ‘red’ ‘green’ and ‘blue’ but in fact they mild incorrect all respond to a wide range of wavelengths of light. Our interpretation sensation of colour depends on the relative stimulation from of colour. these cells. The graph below shows ‘sensitivity of the three Is there the types of cone cells to light of different frequency. colour spectrum for various organic matter? When they say ‘someone has chemistry with someone’ does that mean they If we ignore the blue cells for the moment then: have actually o If the red cells are stimulated more than the green cells then electrical we have a sensation we call ‘Red’ charge is o If the red cells are stimulated about the same as the green magnified in cells then we have a sensation we call ‘Yellow’ the body? o If the red cells are stimulated less than the green cells then we have a sensation we call ‘Green’ What the graph above shows is that the red and green cells have a very similar response. In people who are colour blind, the response curves may be more similar giving them a weaker ability to distinguish between shades of red and green and yellow. In some people one type of either red or green cell is completely absent and these people cannot distinguish reds and greens at all. I am not sure that I understand you comment about organic matter. In general visible light is emitted from electrons around individual atoms and is characteristic of that atom. Organic matter means molecules built around carbon atoms and commonly including hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen atoms. The way these compounds absorb and emit infrared light depends on the details of how the molecules are bonded together. When we say a ‘couple have chemistry’ I suspect we are saying that in same way that chemistry at school was mysterious but seemed to work. So we have no clue as to what they see in each other, but they seem to get on. 9 You said… Michael said… You were right when you said Sorry: Things should be easier tonight. at the beginning of tonight’s Don’t worry about forgetting things. talk “TONIGHT WILL BE The first stage of learning is just ‘becoming DIFFICULT…..”. familiar’. And in the same way that I forget the So difficult for me to names of people I was introduced to 1 minute ago understand – let alone – so it’s easy to forget labels for new ideas. remember – that I can’t even But just thinking about these things develops formulate a question from familiarity, and so at some point in the future the mass of information. you may meet these ideas again, and feel NOT to work tho’ cos it was differently: it might feel like meeting an old interesting (but sadly friend forgettable) all the same. Great When you ‘look at a light’ you have an experience that you call presentation. ‘seeing the light’. It involves: If you look at o Electromagnetic waves from the ‘light-emitting object’ a light, what travelling through the air to your eye. do you see. o The focussing of the waves onto your retina to create an image And do you of the object. watch Big o The stimulation of different types of cells each of which Bang Theory. responds differently depending on the range of frequencies present in the light. o The neural processing of these data to elicit your sensation o So what you ‘see’ is the result of complex process involving atomic physics, optics, bio-chemistry and neuroscience. WOW! I wouldn’t say that I watch it, but my children do and I have seen some episodes. So, if we have a set number of No more than the Earth could run out electrons and channel electricity not of water if we all ran a bath at the ‘create’ it, could we theoretically run same time. We could run out locally – out? (If it was all being channelled at but not on the scale of the whole Earth. the same time). No excuse required, I love geographers Please excuse me if this is a ridiculous question. I am a geographer. Lots of amazing facts and coherent explanations. Elevating. Amazing! 10 You are welcome You said… Michael said… Really interesting – Yes, the connection between light and atoms is very learnt so much this profound. I only learned it – or rather it only ‘clicked’ – week. Changed how I in my second year at University and then I just see and think about thought ‘WoW!’ light. It is a beautiful Wiki (of course) has all the details, but basically blue concept. light in frequency range 670 THz to 714 THz How is light used as a (wavelength range 420-448 nm) can break down the therapy (as a nurse). bilirubin, a chemical which accumulates in the blood I’ve seen how about half of all babies because the enzyme which ultraviolet light is used normally breaks it down has been underactive during to treat jaundice in pregnancy. Wiki tells me that : babies? – What does “Phototherapy works through a process of isomerization the UV light do? that changes trans-bilirubin into the water-soluble cisbilirubin isomer.” In honesty, I am not sure what that means. Light does not Mmmm. move, as the The whole point of the giant Jelly Baby Wave Machine was to jelly bean show that while each kebab stick just twists up and down, a experiment wave-like disturbance travels without transporting any Jelly proved, it is the Babies along the wave direction force on the Similarly, the electric field in each location only goes up and adjacent atom down i.e. increase and decreases, but the wave – which we call that is visible as light or radio waves or X-rays depending on its frequency – light. travels through space. However, why Amazingly the filament of an incandescent light heats up to does it take about 2500 °C in just a small fraction of a second. In a longer for light compact fluorescent bulb, an electric charge needs to build from compact up to generate an initial spark through the tube. That is fluorescent light cause of the delay of a second or so before they switch emit to get to us than light. old incandescence. 11 You said… Are the spectral lines from distant planets red shifted? And if so, how do we establish which element has emitted them? Michael said… No, the relative motion of planets in our solar system is not fast enough to cause significant re-shift. But the identification of an element doesn’t rest on a single emission line, but rather on the pattern – akin to the way the details of a fingerprint identifies a person. So if one emission line occurs in particular relationship with another one, then we can identify the atom even if both are shifted from where they would be detected on Earth. The picture below from Wikipedia gives you the idea http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift How far can light travel before it red shifts to infrared? Do gamma ray photons get absorbed by glass? (Three drawings on page). The frequency of light does not change with distance travelled. If red light with a frequency of 400 THz is emitted by a star then we will also see red light with a frequency of 400 THz. However if the star that emits the light is moving away from us very fast then light wave is ‘stretched’ and appears to have a lower frequency – the so-called ‘Red Shift’ Wikipedia tells me that distant stars appear to be moving away from Earth at speed of 21 km/s per million light years distant and since some stars can be billions of light years away, they appear to recede at amazingly high speeds Gamma rays are only weekly absorbed by glass – we will try this experiment in Week 6. If I skip it – please remind me. 12 You said… I’m studying ‘A’ level physics – still don’t really understand how light can be both a wave and a particle? What’s wrong with people that are colour blind? Why is mixing paint colours different to mixing light colours? Michael said… Well don’t worry about it, you are in good company. The following may or may not help: When people say that light can be a ‘particle’ they do not mean a particle as you or I would use the word. It is a technical physics description. You and I would not use the word ‘particle’ to describe an object which had no mass, and which was created by the billion every second and destroyed nanoseconds later. All light is emitted by atoms and travels as a wave – there is no doubt about this. But when light reaches an object we find even though the wave is extended in space – potentially over vast distances – the light is always absorbed by a single atom in one location – as if it were hit by ‘a particle’. We can describe this process – where the wave is extended over space but is then detected in only a single place - but it doesn’t have a simple analogy in our normal experience. I have mentioned about colour-blindness somewhere up above. Let me give you an example of light mixing. You experience the sensation of ‘red’ when light with a frequency of roughly 400 THz enters your eyes. o If it enters your eyes directly from an emitter – such a ’red’ LED, then the process is pretty straight-forward stimulation of the ‘cone’ cells. o However if you look at an object which is illuminated by white light and experience the sensation of ‘red’, then the to create the red sensation, the surface chemicals (pigments and inks) must have subtracted (i.e. absorbed) the blue and green light present in the white light in the room. So looking at emitting objects – the primary colours are Red Green and Blue which stimulate directly our three types of cone cells, Looking at reflected light the primary colours are : o Cyan (which subtracts Red light from white light) leaving components which stimulate mainly the ‘blue’ and ‘green’ cone cells. o Magenta (which subtracts Green light from white light) leaving components which stimulate mainly the ‘blue’ and ‘red’ cone cells. o Yellow (which subtracts Blue light from white light) leaving components which stimulate mainly the ‘red’ and ‘green’ cone cells. So to get ‘red’ one uses an ink containing magenta (which removes green) and yellow (which removes blue) leaving just the red light Sorry it’s so complicated! 13 You said… Michael said… How long does it take to answer all of these questions? How do we know that the colours we see are the same? As in we call trees green but to some people green could look red but they wouldn’t know because all their life they would have called it green. What is your favourite colour and why? Several hours. This is a profound philosophical question which has its roots in physics, but is really about the foundations of language and the ability to know what someone means when they refer to a ‘shared’ experience. I seem to recall that Wittgenstein – amongst others – wrote extensively on this issue in his later years. In the case of colour, I have friends whose experience of ‘red’ is not the same in each eye, so we can guess that between people, variations exist. However, I don’t think the variability can be too great otherwise we would eventually realise that something wasn’t quite right. My favourite colour is red, but I don’t know why. Can you “light up” Just pickled ones: it’s the massive amounts of salt (NaCl) any vegetables, that make gherkins taste so good and which gives us the or only pickled yellow glow. ones? I met some chemist from Imperial College who washed the salt out of the gherkins by soaking them in water for weeks and then replaced the sodium chloride (NaCl) with potassium chloride (KCl) to get a purplish glow. Really excited to be inside this You are very welcome. Your taxes (well not handsome new-ish building, and I just yours – other people helped too!) have realised this evening that I feel paid for the building. as if I am at one of the Royal I did once apply to do the Christmas Lectures Christmas lectures – which I at the RI but they said I wasn’t an academic have only seen on TV. Trying and so they wouldn’t look at the application. hard to take it all in – many Hey Ho. thanks. Last week you suggested that we should Mmmmm. Fair point. abandon the myth of the ‘mad scientist’. I am not sure what you mean. Did you However, after the jelly baby mean that the fact that we have experiment I felt a bit of eccentricity evolved to have a visual system helps put across a concept. designed for the spectrum of light Q: Where does the sun come into the emitted by our nearby star? equation? Loved the jelly baby You welcome: It will be back in Week 5. example – great visual When I am talking – which I can do endlessly! – it can be to help understanding. hard to think. It is only when I stop talking that people Thanks! get a chance to relax and ‘think’. Thanks for making a very complicated subject fun. You are welcome. 14 You said… Gherkin. If the current is AC, why does only one end light up? Michael said… To be completely honest I don’t know why the Gherkin only lights up at one end. Although I am curious – it is one of those questions that has never made it up my priority list to answer. But I have thought about it. Here are some observations: One: The end which lights up changes from one gherkin to the next. Two: We are using AC current which travels both ways through the Gherkin, reversing every 1/100th of a second. Three: You can see this more clearly at lower voltage – is that it takes a few seconds for the light to emerge. Putting these things together I think what happens is that: Initially the salty water makes a good electrical contact with the tines of the fork. As the gherkin heats up the water evaporates and at some point direct electrical contact gets very poor and a spark (a region of hot, ionised gas since you ask) jumps from the tine to the gherkin – and it is this which emits the light. The gas in the spark contains sodium atoms and so gives out yellow light which then glows eerily inside the gherkin. Once this happens at one end, the current is reduced and it becomes unlikely to happen at the other end as well. After a few seconds it stops because the electrical connection becomes too poor. And that is my guess 15 You said… Michael said… Q1: Re diffraction. If it’s Great question, and yes it matters. One common way due to the response of to prepare these slits is to print them on to a the atoms on the edges transparent slide. of the wire/slit, does the o So if you print them in black, then that makes a material the wire/slit is standard slit. By ‘black’ we mean an ink containing made of have an effect atoms and molecules that absorb light of all on the diffraction colours. observed? o But if you created the slit with ink that didn’t Q2: The spectroscopy, if absorb light – then it would be transparent – and you are looking at light you wouldn’t have a slit! emitted by something o (Re-reading this I am not sure how clear I have composed of several been, but I think it just about makes sense) elements (e.g. the Yes it does get really confusing – like having two atmosphere of a planet) fingerprints present at the scene of a crime. But as how can you interpret the my answers to a couple of questions earlier indicate, spectrum? As they it is possible to unravel complex mixed spectra by a overlap, doesn’t that get process of guessing and elimination. Once you find really confusing? one element which ‘fits’ (there are only about 100 Comment: Thanks very possibilities and a much smaller number of likely much for the glasses! I candidates) then the resulting spectrum gets will pass on to my son’s yr simpler, and it becomes easier to identify the 1 class who are doing a remaining elements. topic on “light and dark” at the mo. So ghosts are made of ultraviolet Interesting idea except that the light would light to gamma rays since we be quickly gone – and if it went through our can’t see them and they can pass eyes we wouldn’t see it! The questions is this: through us! what would be emitting the UV light and What about the glasses with gamma rays? gratings, didn’t the light The region that you saw as red on the left ‘increase’, in your experiment, and right of the central bright patch was then why doesn’t the light coming where the light with frequency 400 THz was through the glasses ‘increase’? re-inforced. Light with frequency of 700 THz was cancelled in these regions leading to you seeing no ‘blue’ light and so you saw only ‘red’ light. I found it Thank you electrifying. 16 You said… Michael said… If Na2CO3 Sea salt is not made by an acid reaction with sodium chloride. (sodium Actually I have never quite understood this, so consulting carbonate) Wikipedia I read that currently ‘we’ think the sodium arrives combines with in the sea by being washed in from the rivers of the world, HCl hydrochloric and the chlorine derives from dissolved volcanic gases. acid to make The evaporation of ocean water and the perpetual ‘washing’ of NaCl + CO2 + rocks resulted in an increased concentration of salt over H2O, then how is geological time periods, but the salinity is now reasonably sea salt made in constant. the absence of Both co-valent and ionic bonding are basically electrostatic in acid, and since origin. H2O (water) is o In covalent bonding – which I think I described last week – neutral pH. the electron orbit is shared between two atoms resulting in What is the electric charge in between the two atoms which pulls the difference nuclei inwards towards each other. between ionic o In ionic bonding the electric field of one atom completely and covalent strips the electron from the other atom resulting in a bonding? positive ion and a negative ion which are then electrically Why are atom attracted to each other. shells 2 then 8? Most covalent bonds are not purely covalent: pure covalent And can you bonds only occur between identical atoms (H2, N2 etc.). In cowrite Ra(86) as valent bonds between different types of atoms electrons atomic prefer orbits which draw them closer to one atom or the structure? other. So normal co-valent bonds are slightly ionic in character. The massive nucleus of a radon atom contains 86 protons and so a radon atom has to accommodate 86 electron orbits. The electronic structure is described by a diagram such as that above, or as ([Xe] 4f14 5d10 6s2 6p6) i.e. a core equivalent to a Xenon atom o + 14 electrons in orbitals called 4f o + 10 electrons in orbitals called 5d o + 2 electrons in orbitals called 6s o + 8 electrons in orbitals called 6p The numbers and letters describe the detailed shape of the orbits. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radon 17 You said… Do light waves only oscillate in a vertical plane or do they go in a horizontal one as well. Michael said… Great Question , and yes they do vibrate in both ways If the electric charge that generates the light wave moves up and down, then it generates a wave in the electric field that first points upwards and then points downwards. If the electric charge that generates the light wave moves left and right, then it generates a wave in the electric field that first points left and then points right. The two types of wave are called the polarisations of light. Normal light is un-polarised i.e. a mixture of up-and-down and left-and-right polarisations. We exploit the polarisation of light in many ways. o Sunlight reflected from shiny surfaces is slightly polarised and so Polaroid™ sunglasses can preferentially block this ‘glare’ o In 3-D cinema shows the image seen by the left and right eyes are polarised and the special glasses one wears can block ‘the other’ polarisation. Image from Nikon Web Site http://www.microscopyu.com/articles/polarized/polarizedlightintro.html 18 You said… The song mentioned cosmic rays. What are they? How much do we know about them? Is the electromagnetic range different for animals. Michael said… Our first appreciation that some kind of radiation came from ‘the cosmos’ was when we first made radiation detectors. Scientist put films on balloons and found that the was more radiation the higher one went in the atmosphere. They called this cosmic radiation. No one knew what it was. In the 1950s when these songs were made the general belief was that the source of this radiation was very high frequency electromagnetic waves. Now we understand most of this radiation is electrons, positrons and protons. No one knows exactly where they come from or what process accelerates particles to such phenomenal energy. I wrote about this in a blog article a couple of years ago: expect more news about this soon-ish as a new satellite instrument is collecting data scientists have only previously dreamed about. http://protonsforbreakfast.wordpress.com/2011/05/16/cosmic-adventure/ By this I think you mean can animals see different ranges of electromagnetic radiation. Yes. Insects which go out in the daylight can see into the ultraviolet. Some animals which hunt in the dark, such as snakes, can apparently sense infrared radiation, as can insects such as can mosquitos. What is the I am not sure by what you mean by ‘arrangement’. Can you arrangement of ask this again this week if you need more clarification? antimatter and is it A football has a mass of approximately 0.50 kg. If this true that annihilated with 0.5 kg of normal matter then the amount antimatter that is of energy released would be given by Einstein’s famous the mass of a Equation football has a E = m c2 potential to destroy the m = 0.5 + 0.5 = 1 kilogram galaxy? c = 300,000,000 metres per second Thanks for the great lecture. E = 9 x 1016 joules A nuclear explosion equivalent to 1 million tonnes of TNT corresponds to the release of 4.184×1015 joules of energy. So this is equivalent to the energy in about 20 very large explosions. That’s a lot of energy but well short of that required to ‘destroy the galaxy’ 19 You said… Michael said… Electron tree I don’t know how many Coulombs of electricity is used downstairs. I see this –but it is an extreme process. Andrew Hanson made a on TV. How much nice little video about how it’s done: electricity is needed to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W34a2zDfrTQ charge the glass? 41! That is so young – plenty of time to go ‘back to Absolutely love the school’ in one way or another. course. You make me Yes-ish. If the thing detecting the light is at a place want to go back to where destructive interference occurs then, yes, they school at 41. would see no light from the wire. But this won’t work Can interference be at all wavelengths (colours) or for all directions. used to make objects But this ‘cancellation’ by interference is used in invisible? ‘sound-cancelling’ headphones. A microphone listens to Question 3: How does the ambient sound and produces an extra sound which the mirror on the moon cancels the ambient sound in one place: the entrance work? It reflects back to your ear. The cancellation doesn’t take place at the same angle no everywhere – so in other places the sound becomes matter which direction louder – but that’s not where your ear is! the light comes from. The ‘ray’ diagrams below show (a) how a normal mirror works and (b) how two mirrors can be placed together to reflect light back in the same direction in twodimensions. The mirror-on-the-moon is an analogous three-dimensional arrangement of three mirrors at right angles called a ‘corner cube’. You can try making up the 2-mirror arrangement below with ordinary mirrors. The results are shocking – when you lift your right arm – the right arm on your reflection lifts up – which is not what you are used to seeing. (a) (b) I’m back. Ha ha ha. How do you find all these links to songs and Dave’s whizzing periodic table? Better than last time. Amazing. See you next week! 20 Welcome back! I don’t know how I found them originally – I guess it was serendipity. Thank you for your kind comments.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz