COURT CITATIONS TO THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY
As of January 1, 2015
U.S. SUPREME COURT
Southern Union Company v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 2344, 2350 n.1 (2012) (citing Kathryn
Preyer, Penal Measures in the American Colonies: An Overview, 26 AJLH 326 (1982))
Bilski v. Kappos, 130 S. Ct. 3218, 3243 n.26 (2010) (Stevens, J., dissenting) (citing Irah Donner,
The Copyright Clause of the U.S. Constitution: Why Did the Framers Include It With Unanimous
Approval?, 36 AJLH 361 (1992))
McDonald v. City of Chicago, 130 S. Ct. 3020, 3090 n.5 (2010) (Stevens, J., dissenting) (citing Earl
M. Maltz, Fourteenth Amendment Concepts in the Antebellum Era, 32 AJLH 305 (1988))
Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 100 (2010) (Thomas, J., dissenting) (citing Kathryn Preyer, Penal
Measures in the American Colonies: An Overview, 26 AJLH 326 (1982))
Carcieri v. Salazar, 555 U.S. 379, 398 (2009) (Breyer, J., concurring) (citing William W. Quinn, Jr.,
Federal Acknowledgment of American Indian Tribes: The Historical Development of a Legal
Concept, 34 AJLH 331 (1990))
Watson v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc., 551 U.S. 142, 147-48 (2007) (citing William M. Wiecek,
The Reconstruction of Federal Judicial Power, 1863-1875, 13 AJLH 333 (1969))
Central Virginia Community College v. Katz, 546 U.S. 356, 368 (2006) (citing Kurt H. Nadelmann,
On the Origin of the Bankruptcy Clause, 1 AJLH 215 (1957))
McKune v. Lile, 536 U.S. 24, 57 n.3 (2002) (Stevens, J., dissenting) (citing Katharine B. Hazlett,
The Nineteenth Century Origins of the Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, 42
AJLH 235 (1998))
Lewis v. Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc., 531 U.S. 438, 444 (2001) (citing William R. Casto, The Origins
of Federal Admiralty Jurisdiction in an Age of Privateers, Smugglers, and Pirates, 37 AJLH 117
(1993))
Mitchell v. Helms, 530 U.S. 793, 828 (2000) (citing Steven K. Green, The Blaine Amendment
Reconsidered, 36 AJLH 38 (1992))
Jones v. United States, 526 U.S. 227, 244 (1999) (citing Kathryn Preyer, Penal Measures in the
American Colonies: An Overview, 26 AJLH 326 (1982))
2
Kalina v. Fletcher, 522 U.S. 118, 124 n.11 (1997) (citing John H. Langbein, The Origins of Public
Prosecution at Common Law, 17 AJLH 313 (1973))
Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, 513 U.S. 527, 546 n.6 (1995)
(citing William R. Casto, The Origins of Federal Admiralty Jurisdiction in an Age of Privateers,
Smugglers, and Pirates, 37 AJLH 117 (1993))
American Dredging Company v. Miller, 510 U.S. 443, 461 (1994) (Stevens, J., concurring) (citing
William R. Casto, The Origins of Federal Admiralty Jurisdiction in an Age of Privateers,
Smugglers, and Pirates, 37 AJLH 117 (1993))
United States v. Dunnigan, 507 U.S. 87, 94-95 (1993) (citing Michael D. Gordon, The Invention of
a Common Law Crime: Perjury and the Elizabethan Courts, 24 AJLH 145 (1980))
New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144, 207 n.3 (1992) (White, J., concurring in part and
dissenting in part) (citing William M. Wiecek, The Reconstruction of Federal Judicial Power,
1863-1875, 13 AJLH 333 (1969))
Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Haslip, 499 U.S. 1, 28 (1991) (Scalia, J., concurring)
(citing Keith Jurow, Untimely Thoughts: A Reconsideration of the Origins of Due Process of Law,
19 AJLH 265 (1975))
Tibbs v. Florida, 457 U.S. 31, 40 n.14 (1982) (citing Jay A. Sigler, A History of Double Jeopardy, 7
AJLH 283 (1963))
Railway Labor Executives’ Association v. Gibbons, 455 U.S. 457, 472 (1982) (citing Kurt H.
Nadelmann, On the Origin of the Bankruptcy Clause, 1 AJLH 215 (1957))
Roberts v. United States, 445 U.S. 552, 565 (1980) (citing P.R. Glazebrook, Misprision of
Felony—Shadow or Phantom?, 8 AJLH 189 (1964))
Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 823 n.18 (1975) (citing Thomas G. Barnes, Due Process and
Slow Process in the Late Elizabethan-Early Stuart Star Chamber, 6 AJLH 221 (1962))
Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 823 n.18 (1975) (citing Thomas G. Barnes, Star Chamber
Mythology, 5 AJLH 1 (1961))
Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 696 n.35 (1972) (citing P.R. Glazebrook, Misprision of
Felony—Shadow or Phantom?, 8 AJLH 189 (1964))
Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 321 n.19 (1972) (Marshall, J., concurring) (citing William
Bradford, An Enquiry How Far the Punishment of Death is Necessary in Pennsylvania, 12 AJLH
122 (1968))
3
Cole v. Richardson, 405 U.S. 676, 696 (1972) (Marshall, J., dissenting) (citing Lewis D. Asper, The
Long and Unhappy History of Loyalty Testing in Maryland, 13 AJLH 97 (1969))
Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112, 279 n.49 (1970) (Brennan, J., dissenting) (citing T.E. James, The
Age of Majority, 4 AJLH 22 (1960))
North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 729 (1969) (Douglas, J., concurring) (citing Jay A. Sigler,
A History of Double Jeopardy, 7 AJLH 283 (1963))
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 527 (1966) (White, J., dissenting) (citing Lewis Mayers, The
Federal Witness’ Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Constitutional or Common-Law?, 4 AJLH
107 (1960))
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS—FIRST CIRCUIT
United States v. Southern Union Company, 630 F.3d 17, 35 (1st Cir. 2010) (citing Kathryn Preyer,
Penal Measures in the American Colonies, 26 AJLH 326 (1982))
United States v. Caraballo-Rodriguez, 480 F.3d 62, 76 (1st Cir. 2007) (citing P.R. Glazebrook,
Misprision of Felony—Shadow or Phantom?, 8 AJLH 189 (1964))
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS—SECOND CIRCUIT
United States v. Nelson, 277 F.3d 164, 190 (2d Cir. 2002) (citing Andrew Fede, Legitimized
Violent Slave Abuse in the American South, 1619-1865: A Case Study of Law and Social Change
in Six Southern States, 29 AJLH 93 (1985))
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS—THIRD CIRCUIT
United States v. Grimes, 641 F.2d 96, 102 n.20 (3d Cir. 1981) (citing Jay A. Sigler, A History of
Double Jeopardy, 7 AJLH 283 (1963))
Mahone v. Waddle, 564 F.2d 1018, 1046 n.16 (3d Cir. 1977) (Grimes, Cir. J., dissenting in part
and concurring in part) (citing William M. Wiecek, The Reconstruction of Federal Judicial Power,
1863-1875, 13 AJLH 333 (1969))
Rapp v. Van Dusen, 350 F.2d 806, 811 n.16 (3d Cir. 1965) (citing Leonard S. Goodman,
Mandamus in the Colonies—The Rise of the Superintending Power of American Courts, 1 AJLH
308 (1957) & 2 AJLH 1 (1958))
4
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS—FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 570 n.1 (5th Cir. 2013) (Graves, Cir. J., concurring)
(citing Mortimer Levine, A More than Ordinary Case of “Rape,” 13 and 14 Elizabeth I, 7 AJLH 159
(1963))
Rangra v. Brown, 566 F.3d 515, 520 n.12 (5th Cir. 2009) (citing Stephen A. Siegel, The Origin of
the Compelling State Interest Test and Strict Scrutiny, 48 AJLH 355 (2006))
De Luna v. United States, 308 F.2d 140, 144 n.3 (5th Cir. 1962) (citing Lewis Mayers, The Federal
Witness’ Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Constitutional or Common-Law?, 4 AJLH 107
(1960))
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS—SIXTH CIRCUIT
Schultz v. United States, 529 F.3d 343, 354-55 (6th Cir. 2008) (citing Kurt H. Nadelmann, On the
Origin of the Bankruptcy Clause, 1 AJLH 215 (1957))
In re Hood, 262 B.R. 412, 418 (6th Cir. BAP 2001) (citing Kurt H. Nadelmann, On the Origin of the
Bankruptcy Clause, 1 AJLH 215 (1957))
Kewanee Oil Company v. Bicron Corporation, 478 F.2d 1074, 1079 n.3 (6th Cir. 1973) (citing
Frank D. Prager, Historic Background and Foundation of American Patent Law, 5 AJLH 309
(1961))
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS—SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Lake Shore Asset Management Ltd., 646 F.3d 401,
407 (7th Cir. 2011) (citing A.H. Angelo, Andorra: Introduction to a Customary Legal System, 14
AJLH 95 (1970))
United States v. McGee, 612 F.3d 627, 634 (7th Cir. 2010) (citing James D. Rice, The Criminal
Trial Before and After the Lawyers: Authority, Law, and Culture in Maryland Jury Trials, 16811837, 40 AJLH 455 (1996))
Society of Lloyd’s v. Ashenden, 233 F.3d 473, 476 (7th Cir. 2000) (citing Keith Jurow, Untimely
Thoughts: A Reconsideration of the Origins of Due Process of Law, 19 AJLH 265 (1975))
Gosnell v. City of Troy, Illinois, 59 F.3d 654, 658 (7th Cir. 1995) (citing Keith Jurow, Untimely
Thoughts: A Reconsideration of the Origins of Due Process of Law, 19 AJLH 265 (1975))
United States v. Martinez, 988 F.2d 685, 691 (7th Cir. 1993) (citing Bernard J. Brown, The
Demise of Chance Medley and the Recognition of Provocation as a Defence to Murder in English
Law, 7 AJLH 310 (1963))
5
Coniston Corporation v. Village of Hoffman Estates, 844 F.2d 461, 465 (7th Cir. 1988) (citing
Keith Jurow, Untimely Thoughts: A Reconsideration of the Origins of Due Process of Law, 19
AJLH 265 (1975))
Scott v. Village of Kewaskum, 786 F.2d 338, 340 (7th Cir. 1986) (citing Keith Jurow, Untimely
Thoughts: A Reconsideration of the Origins of Due Process of Law, 19 AJLH 265 (1975))
Gumz v. Morrissette, 772 F.2d 1395, 1405 (7th Cir. 1985) (Easterbrook, Cir. J., concurring) (citing
Keith Jurow, Untimely Thoughts: A Reconsideration of the Origins of Due Process of Law, 19
AJLH 265 (1975))
LaSalle National Bank v. Rosewell, 604 F.2d 530, 539 (7th Cir. 1979) (citing William M. Wiecek,
The Reconstruction of Federal Judicial Power, 1863-1875, 13 AJLH 333 (1969))
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS—EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Anastasoff v. United States, 223 F.3d 898, 903 (8th Cir. 2000) (citing Frederick G. Kempin, Jr.,
Precedent and Stare Decisis: The Critical Years, 1800-1850, 3 AJLH 28 (1959))
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS—NINTH CIRCUIT
United States v. Alvarez, 638 F.3d 666, 673 n.6 (9th Cir. 2011) (Smith, Cir. J., concurring) (citing
Larry D. Eldridge, Before Zenger: Truth and Seditious Speech in Colonial America, 1607-1700, 39
AJLH 337 (1995))
Bartholomew v. Crowley Marine Services, Inc., 337 F.3d 1083, 1085 n.5 (9th Cir. 2003) (citing
Timothy J. Runyan, The Rolls of Oleron and the Admiralty Court in Fourteenth Century England,
19 AJLH 95 (1975))
Marine Cooks & Stewards, AFL v. Panama Steamship Company, Ltd., 265 F.2d 780, 784 n.6 (9th
Cir. 1959) (citing Joanne Mathiasen, Some Problems of Admiralty Jurisdiction in the 17th
Century, 2 AJLH 215 (1958))
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS—TENTH CIRCUIT
United States v. Strandlof, 667 F.3d 1146, 1167 (10th Cir. 2012) (citing Larry D. Eldridge, Before
Zenger: Truth and Seditious Speech in Colonial America, 1607-1700, 39 AJLH 337 (1995))
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS—DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Heller v. District of Columbia, 670 F.3d 1244, 1281 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (Kavanaugh, Cir. J.,
dissenting) (citing Stephen A. Siegel, The Origin of the Compelling State Interest Test and Strict
Scrutiny, 48 AJLH 355 (2006))
6
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS—FEDERAL CIRCUIT
In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943, 985 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (Newman, Cir. J., dissenting) (citing Frank D.
Prager, Historic Background and Foundation of American Patent Law, 5 AJLH 309 (1961))
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS—ARMED FORCES
United States v. Hogue, 45 M.J. 300, 301 (Armed Forces 1996) (citing Arthur K. Steinberg, Book
Review, 39 AJLH 278 (1995))
U.S. DISTRICT COURT—DISTRICT OF ALASKA
Native Village of Venetie I.R.A. Council v. State of Alaska, 1994 WL 730893 at *5 (D. Alaska
1994) (citing William W. Quinn, Jr., Federal Acknowledgment of American Indian Tribes: The
Historical Development of a Legal Concept, 34 AJLH 331 (1990))
U.S. DISTRICT COURT—DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Stand Up for California! v. United States Department of the Interior, 919 F. Supp. 2d 51, 69
(D.D.C. 2013) (citing William W. Quinn, Jr., Federal Acknowledgement of American Indian Tribes:
The Historical Development of a Legal Concept, 34 AJLH 331 (1990))
Hoffa v. Saxbe, 378 F. Supp. 1221, 1226 n.4 (D.D.C. 1974) (citing Stanley Grupp, Some Historical
Aspects of the Pardon in England, 7 AJLH 51 (1963))
U.S. DISTRICT COURT—DISTRICT OF HAWAI’I
Rice v. Cayetano, 963 F. Supp. 1547, 1553 (D. Haw. 1997) (citing William W. Quinn, Jr., Federal
Acknowledgment of American Indian Tribes: The Historical Development of a Legal Concept, 34
AJLH 331 (1990))
U.S. DISTRICT COURT—DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
In re Chung-I Liang, 474 B.R. 37, 41 n.2 (Bkrtcy. D. Mass. 2012) (citing Richard H. Chused, Late
Nineteenth Century Married Women’s Property Law: Reception of the Early Married Women’s
Property Acts by Courts and Legislatures, 29 AJLH 3 (1985))
Gill v. Office of Personnel Management, 699 F. Supp. 2d 374, 391 n.125 (D. Mass. 2010) (citing
Michael Grossberg, Guarding the Altar: Physiological Restrictions and the Rise of State
Intervention in Matrimony, 26 AJLH 197 (1982))
In re Dehon, Inc., 327 B.R. 38, 52 (Bkrtcy. D. Mass. 2005) (citing Kurt H. Nadelmann, On the
Origin of the Bankruptcy Clause, 1 AJLH 215 (1957))
7
U.S. DISTRICT COURT—DISTRICT OF MONTANA
In re Urban, 361 B.R. 910, 921 (Bkrtcy. D. Mont. 2007) (citing Kurt H. Nadelmann, On the Origin
of the Bankruptcy Clause, 1 AJLH 215 (1957))
U.S. DISTRICT COURT—DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
United States v. Beebe, 807 F. Supp. 2d 1045, 1052 (D.N.M. 2011) (citing Andrew Fede,
Legitimized Violent Slave Abuse in the American South, 1619-1865: A Case Study of Law and
Social Change in Six Southern States, 29 AJLH 93 (1985))
U.S. DISTRICT COURT—DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
Santiago v. Sea-Land Service, Inc., 366 F. Supp. 1309, 1311 (D.P.R. 1973) (citing Leonard S.
Goodman, Eighteenth Century Conflict of Laws: Critique of an Erie and Klaxon Rationale, 5 AJLH
326 (1961))
Fireman’s Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey v. Gulf Puerto Rico Lines, Inc., 349 F. Supp.
952, 961 (D.P.R. 1972) (citing Leonard S. Goodman, Eighteenth Century Conflict of Laws:
Critique of an Erie and Klaxon Rationale, 5 AJLH 326 (1961))
U.S. DISTRICT COURT—DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Maxton v. Sanford, 2007 WL 1258143 at *2 (D.S.C. 2007) (citing Joseph Plescia, Judicial
Accountability and Immunity in Roman Law, 45 AJLH 51 (2001))
U.S. DISTRICT COURT—EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
United States v. Polouizzi, 687 F. Supp. 2d 133, 180 (E.D.N.Y. 2010) (citing Douglas Greenberg,
Crime, Law Enforcement, and Social Control in Colonial America, 26 AJLH 293 (1982))
United States v. Polizzi, 549 F. Supp. 2d 308, 453 (E.D.N.Y. 2008) (citing John Marshall Mitnick,
From Neighbor-Witness to Judge of Proofs: The Transformation of the English Civil Juror, 32
AJLH 201 (1988))
United States v. Polizzi, 549 F. Supp. 2d 308, 417 (E.D.N.Y. 2008) (citing Douglas Greenberg,
Crime, Law Enforcement, and Social Control in Colonial America, 26 AJLH 293 (1982))
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. AcuSport, Inc., 271 F. Supp. 2d
435, 473-74 (E.D.N.Y. 2003) (citing John Marshall Mitnick, From Neighbor-Witness to Judge of
Proofs: The Transformation of the English Civil Juror, 32 AJLH 201 (1988))
8
U.S. DISTRICT COURT—EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
In re Sacred Heart Hospital of Norristown, 204 B.R. 132, 139 n.7 (E.D. Pa. 1997) (citing Kurt H.
Nadelmann, On the Origin of the Bankruptcy Clause, 1 AJLH 215 (1957))
U.S. DISTRICT COURT—NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States v. AU Optronics Corp., 2011 WL 2837418 at *3 (N.D. Cal. 2011) (citing Kathryn
Preyer, Penal Measures in the American Colonies: An Overview, 26 AJLH 326 (1982))
U.S. DISTRICT COURT—NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Matter of Morris, 12 B.R. 321, 333 n.27 (Bkrtcy. N.D. Ill. 1981) (citing Kurt H. Nadelmann, On
the Origin of the Bankruptcy Clause, 1 AJLH 215 (1957))
U.S. DISTRICT COURT—NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Biklen v. Board of Education, City School District, Syracuse, New York, 333 F. Supp. 902, 909 n.16
(N.D.N.Y. 1971) (citing Lewis D. Asper, The Long and Unhappy History of Loyalty Testing in
Maryland, 13 AJLH 97 (1969))
U.S. DISTRICT COURT—NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Selsor v. Trammel, 2013 WL 6535700 at *5 (N.D. Okla. 2013) (citing Stanley Grupp, Some
Historical Aspects of the Pardon in England, 7 AJLH 51 (1963))
U.S. DISTRICT COURT—SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Dalack v. Village of Tequesta, Florida, 434 F. Supp. 2d 1336, 1339-40 n.6 (S.D. Fla. 2006) (citing
Lewis D. Asper, The Long and Unhappy History of Loyalty Testing in Maryland, 13 AJLH 97
(1969))
U.S. DISTRICT COURT—SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Goonan v. Federal Reserve Board of New York, 916 F. Supp. 2d 470, 492 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (citing
Jay M. Feinman, The Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
U.S. DISTRICT COURT—WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Timber Point Properties III, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A., 2014 WL 7005195, at *6 (W.D. Mo.
2014) (citing Joshua C. Tate, Ownership and Possession in the Early Common Law, 48 AJLH 280
(2006))
9
U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
Figueroa v. United States, 57 Fed. Cl. 488, 498 n.29 (2003) (citing Irah Donner, The Copyright
Clause of the U.S. Constitution: Why Did the Framers Include It With Unanimous Approval?, 36
AJLH 361 (1992))
STATE OF ALABAMA
Hicks v. State, 153 So. 3d 53, 75 n.20 (Ala. 2014) (Parker, J. concurring) (citing Randy Beck, SelfConscious Dicta: The Origins of Roe v. Wade ‘s Trimester Framework, 51 AJLH 505 (2011))
Hamilton v. Scott, 97 So. 3d 728, 742 n.16 (Ala. 2012) (Parker, J., concurring) (citing Randy Beck,
Self-Conscious Dicta: The Origins of Roe v. Wade’s Trimester Framework, 51 AJLH 505 (2011))
Parham v. State, 250 So. 2d 613, 614 n.1 (Ala. Cr. App. 1971) (citing Erwin C. Surrency,
Directions for Holding Court in Colonial Georgia, 2 AJLH 321 (1958))
Gregg v. State, 195 So. 2d 803, 806 (Ala. App. 1966) (citing Erwin C. Surrency, Directions for
Holding Court in Colonial Georgia, 2 AJLH 321 (1958))
Carr v. State, 192 So. 2d 741, 743 (Ala. App. 1966) (citing Erwin C. Surrency, Directions for
Holding Court in Colonial Georgia, 2 AJLH 321 (1958))
STATE OF ARIZONA
Kotterman v. Killian, 972 P.2d 606, 624 (Ariz. 1999) (en banc) (citing Steven K. Green, The Blaine
Amendment Reconsidered, 36 AJLH 38 (1992))
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Apartment Association of Los Angeles County, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 14 P.3d 930, 936 n.2
(Cal. 2001) (citing B.H. McPherson, Revisiting the Manor of East Greenwich, 42 AJLH 35 (1998))
STATE OF COLORADO
Taxpayers for Public Education v. Douglas County School District, 2013 WL 791140 at *13 (Colo.
Ct. App. 2013) (citing Steven K. Green, The Blaine Amendment Reconsidered, 36 AJLH 38 (1992))
People ex rel. People of the City of Horan v. Horan, 556 P.2d 1217, 1223 (Colo. 1976) (en banc)
(Carrigan, J., dissenting) (citing Kenneth C.H. Willig, The Bar in the Third Reich, 20 AJLH 1 (1976))
10
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
Stedman v. Konover Construction Corp., 1994 WL 715842 at *4 (Conn. Super. 1994) (citing Jay
M. Feinman, The Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe v. Town of Southbury, 1993 WL 392950 at *4 (Conn. Super. 1993)
(citing James Warren Springer, American Indians and the Law of Real Property in Colonial New
England, 30 AJLH 25 (1987))
C.R. Klewin, Inc. v. Flagship Properties, Inc., 600 A.2d 772, 776 (Conn. 1991) (citing Philip
Hamburger, The Conveyancing Purposes of the Statute of Frauds, 27 AJLH 354 (1983))
Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc., 479 A.2d 781, 784 (Conn. 1984) (citing Jay M. Feinman,
The Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
STATE OF DELAWARE
Doe v. Wilmington Housing Authority, 88 A.3d 654, 666 n.53 (Del. 2014) (citing Stephen A.
Siegel, The Origin of the Compelling State Interest Test and Strict Scrutiny, 48 AJLH 355 (2006))
Shearin v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., 652 A.2d 578, 585 (Del. Ch. 1994) (citing Jay M. Feinman, The
Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
Hunter v. State, 420 A.2d 119, 129 (Del. 1980) (Quillen, J., concurring) (citing Jay A. Sigler, A
History of Double Jeopardy, 7 AJLH 283 (1963))
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Wieseman v. Kienstra, Inc., 604 N.E.2d 1126, 1130 (Ill. App. 1992) (Chapman, J., dissenting)
(citing Jay M. Feinman, The Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
STATE OF INDIANA
Richardson v. State, 717 N.E. 2d 32, 39 (Ind. 1999) (citing Jay A. Sigler, A History of Double
Jeopardy, 7 AJLH 283 (1963))
Campbell v. Eli Lilly & Company, 421 N.E.2d 1099, 1103 (Ind. 1981) (Hunter, J., dissenting) (citing
Jay M. Feinman, The Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
STATE OF IOWA
Anderson v. Douglas & Lomason Company, 540 N.W.2d 277, 281 (Iowa 1995) (citing Jay M.
Feinman, The Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
11
STATE (COMMONWEALTH) OF KENTUCKY
Matheney v. Commonwealth, 191 S.W.3d 599, 615 (Ky. 2006) (Cooper, J., dissenting) (citing
Frederick G. Kempin, Jr., Precedent and Stare Decisis: The Critical Years, 1800-1850, 3 AJLH 28
(1959))
STATE OF LOUISIANA
Wiley v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, 430 So. 2d 1016, 1021 (La. App. 1982) (citing Jay M.
Feinman, The Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
STATE OF MARYLAND
Owens v. State, 924 A.2d 1072, 1076 n.3 (Md. 2007) (citing Daniel D. Blinka, Jefferson and
Juries: The Problem of Law, Reason, and Politics in the New Republic, 47 AJLH 35 (2005))
Department of Human Resources v. Howard, 918 A.2d 441, 444-45 n.7 (Md. 2007) (citing Ralph
V. Turner, The Origins of Common Pleas and King’s Bench, 21 AJLH 238 (1977))
Pope v. State, 396 A.2d 1054, 1070 (Md. 1979) (citing P.R. Glazebrook, Misprision of Felony—
Shadow or Phantom?, 8 AJLH 189 (1964))
STATE (COMMONWEALTH) OF MASSACHUSETTS
Stonehill College v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, 808 N.E.2d 205, 214
(Mass. 2004) (citing Jay M. Feinman, The Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH
118 (1976))
Department of Revenue v. Jarvenpaa, 534 N.E.2d 286, 293 n.15 (Mass. 1989) (citing Hendrik
Hartog, The Public Law of a County Court: Judicial Government in Eighteenth Century
Massachusetts, 20 AJLH 282 (1976))
STATE OF MICHIGAN
Glass v. Goeckel, 703 N.W.2d 58, 84 (Mich. 2005) (Markman, J., concurring in part and
dissenting in part) (citing Theodore Steinberg, God’s Terminus: Boundaries, Nature, and
Property on the Michigan Shore, 37 AJLH 65 (1993))
People v. Robideau, 355 N.W.2d 592, 610 n.3 (Mich. 1984) (Kavanagh, J., dissenting) (citing Jay
A. Sigler, A History of Double Jeopardy, 7 AJLH 283 (1963))
Willsmore v. Township of Oceola, 308 N.W.2d 796, 803 (Mich. App. 1981) (citing A.E.S. Tay,
“Bridges v. Hawkesworth” and the Early History of Finding, 8 AJLH 224 (1964))
12
People v. Wilder, 308 N.W.2d 112, 116 n.5 (Mich. 1981) (citing Jay A. Sigler, A History of Double
Jeopardy, 7 AJLH 283 (1963))
STATE OF MISSOURI
Jefferson County Fire Protection Districts Association v. Blunt, 205 S.W.3d 866, 868 (Mo. 2006)
(en banc) (citing Robert M. Ireland, The Problem of Local, Private, and Special Legislation in the
Nineteenth-Century United States, 46 AJLH 271 (2004))
Oliver v. State Tax Commission of Missouri, 37 S.W.3d 243, 251 n.20 (Mo. 2001) (en banc)
(citing Steven K. Green, The Blaine Amendment Reconsidered, 36 AJLH 38 (1992))
STATE OF NEVADA
Carrigan v. Commission on Ethics, 236 P.3d 616, 623 n.9 (Nev. 2010) (citing Stephen A. Siegel,
The Origin of the Compelling State Interest Test and Strict Scrutiny, 48 AJLH 355 (2006))
Tellis v. Sheriff of Clark County, 459 P.2d 364, 366 (Nev. 1969) (citing Erwin C. Surrency,
Directions for Holding Court in Colonial Georgia, 2 AJLH 321 (1958))
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Butler v. Walker Power, Inc., 629 A.2d 91, 93 (N.H. 1993) (citing Jay M. Feinman, The
Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Committee to Recall Robert Menendez from the Office of U.S. Senator v. Wells, 7 A.3d 720, 770
(N.J. 2010) (Rivera-Soto, J., dissenting) (citing Lawrence B. Custer, Bushrod Washington and
John Marshall: A Preliminary Inquiry, 4 AJLH 34 (1960))
Negron v. Llarena, 716 A.2d 1158, 1166 (N.J. 1998) (Handler, J., concurring) (citing Anita
Ramasastry, The Parameters, Progressions, and Paradoxes of Baron Bramwell, 38 AJLH 322
(1994))
STATE OF NEW MEXICO
State v. Martinez, 195 P.3d 1232, 1237 (N.M. 2008) (citing Roger D. Groot, The Jury of
Presentment Before 1215, 26 AJLH 1 (1982))
Berlangieri v. Running Elk Corporation, 76 P.3d 1098, 1105 (N.M. 2003) (citing Thomas A. Reed,
Holmes and the Paths of the Law, 37 AJLH 273 (1993))
13
STATE OF NEW YORK
People v. O’Dwyer, 984 N.Y.S.2d 810, 813 (Suffolk Cnty. Ct. 2014) (citing Kathleen S. Goddard, A
Case of Injustice? The Trial of John Bellingham, 46 AJLH 1 (2004))
Murphy v. American Home Products Corporation, 448 N.E.2d 86, 94 n.4 (N.Y. 1983) (Meyer, J.,
dissenting) (citing Jay M. Feinman, The Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH
118 (1976))
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Sides v. Duke Hospital, 328 S.E.2d 818, 824 (N.C. App. 1985) (citing Jay M. Feinman, The
Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
Tice v. Department of Transportation, 312 S.E.2d 241, 244 (N.C. App. 1984) (citing Rita W.
Cooley, Predecessors of the Federal Attorney General: The Attorney General in England and the
American Colonies, 2 AJLH 304 (1958))
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Groce v. Foster, 880 P.2d 902, 904 n.9 (Okla. 1994) (citing Jay M. Feinman, The Development of
the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
Gilmore v. Enogex, Inc., 878 P.2d 360, 363 n.12 (Okla. 1994) (citing Jay M. Feinman, The
Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
Burk v. K-Mart Corporation, 770 P.2d 24, 26 n.3 (Okla. 1989) (citing Jay M. Feinman, The
Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
Copeland v. Anderson, 707 P.2d 560, 565 n.13 (Okla. App. 1985) (citing Michael D. Gordon, The
Invention of a Common Law Crime: Perjury and the Elizabethan Courts, 24 AJLH 145 (1980))
STATE OF OREGON
State v. Mills, 312 P.3d 515, 520 (Or. 2013) (en banc) (citing John Marshall Mitnick, From
Neighbor-Witness to Judge of Proofs: The Transformation of the English Civil Juror, 32 AJLH 201
(1988))
State v. Davis, 256 P.3d 1075, 1080 n.3 (Or. 2011) (en banc) (citing Katharine B. Hazlett, The
Nineteenth Century Origins of the Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, 42 AJLH
235 (1998))
14
Lahmann v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of Eagles, 121 P.3d 671, 681 (Or. App. 2005) (en
banc) (citing Erwin C. Surrency, The Transition from Colonialism to Independence, 46 AJLH 55
(2004))
Sheets v. Knight, 779 P.2d 1000, 1005 (Or. 1989) (citing Jay M. Feinman, The Development of
the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
Northwest Natural Gas Company v. City of Portland, 711 P.2d 119, 127 n.10 (Or. 1985) (citing
Jon C. Teaford, Special Legislation and the Cities, 1865-1900, 23 AJLH 189 (1979))
STATE (COMMONWEALTH) OF PENNSYLVANIA
Spierling v. First American Home Health Services, Inc., 737 A.2d 1250, 1256 (Pa. Super. 1999)
(Schiller, J., dissenting) (citing Jay M. Feinman, The Development of the Employment at Will
Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
Zerbe v. City of Sunbury, 7 Pa. D. & C.4th 483, 488 (Com. Pl. 1990) (citing Jay M. Feinman, The
Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
Commonwealth v. Porreca, 567 A.2d 1044, 1050 n.6 (Pa. Super. 1989) (citing John H. Langbein,
The Origins of Public Prosecution at Common Law, 17 AJLH 313 (1973))
Commonwealth v. Reilly, 549 A.2d 503, 511 (Pa. 1988) (citing Janet A. Tighe, Francis Wharton
and the Nineteenth-Century Insanity Defense: The Origins of a Reform Tradition, 27 AJLH 223
(1983))
Darlington v. General Electric, 504 A.2d 306, 309 (Pa. Super. 1986) (citing Jay M. Feinman, The
Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
Banas v. Matthews International Corporation, 502 A.2d 637, 645 (Pa. Super. 1985) (citing Jay M.
Feinman, The Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
Commonwealth v. Beck, 464 A.2d 316, 319 (Pa. 1983) (Nix, J., dissenting) (citing Jay A. Sigler, A
History of Double Jeopardy, 7 AJLH 283 (1963))
Deer Creek Drainage Basin Authority v. County Board of Elections of the County of Allegheny,
381 A.2d 103, 111 n.7 (Pa. 1977) (Pomeroy, J., dissenting) (citing Erwin C. Surrency, The
Development of the Appellate Function: The Pennsylvania Experience, 20 AJLH 173 (1976))
Commonwealth v. Warfield, 227 A.2d 177, 183 n.4 (Pa. 1967) (Roberts, J., concurring in part and
dissenting in part) (citing Jay A. Sigler, A History of Double Jeopardy, 7 AJLH 283 (1963))
15
STATE OF TEXAS
In Interest of J.W.T., 872 S.W.2d 189, 192 n.8 (Tex. 1994) (citing R.H. Helmholz, Bastardy
Litigation in Medieval England, 13 AJLH 360 (1969))
Texas Antiquities Committee v. Dallas County Community College District, 554 S.W. 924, 932
(Tex. 1977) (Denton, J., dissenting) (citing Bruce A. Campbell, John Marshall, the Virginia
Political Economy, and the Dartmouth College Decision, 19 AJLH 40 (1975))
STATE OF UTAH
State v. Prion, 274 P.3d 919, 931 n.20 (Utah 2012) (citing Joshua C. Tate, Ownership and
Possession in the Early Common Law, 48 AJLH 280 (2006))
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Southcenter Joint Venture v. National Democratic Policy Committee, 780 P.2d 1282, 1296
(Wash. 1989) (en banc) (Utter, J., concurring) (citing Alexis J. Anderson, The Formative Period of
First Amendment Theory, 1870-1915, 24 AJLH 56 (1980))
STATE OF WISCONSIN
Mackenzie v. Miller Brewing Company, 623 N.W.2d 739, 742 n.8 (Wis. 2001) (citing Jay M.
Feinman, The Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
Brockmeyer v. Dun & Bradstreet, 335 N.W.2d 834, 837 n.2 (Wis. 1983) (citing Jay M. Feinman,
The Development of the Employment at Will Rule, 20 AJLH 118 (1976))
TERRITORY OF THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
Percival v. People, 2014 WL 3936333, at *2 (V.I. 2014) (citing P.R. Glazebrook, Misprision of
Felony–Shadow or Phantom?, 8 AJLH 283 (1964))
People v. Simmonds, 2012 WL 2550958 at *5 n.16 (V.I. Super. Ct. 2012) (citing John S. Goff,
William T. Howell and the Code of Arizona, 11 AJLH 221 (1967))
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Momcilovic v. The Queen, [2011] H.C.A. 34 at ¶ 152 n.261 (citing Stewart Jay, Servants of
Monarchs and Lords: The Advisory Role of Early English Judges, 38 AJLH 117 (1994))
Adler v. District Court, [1990] 19 N.S.W.L.R. 317, 349 (citing Keith Jurow, Untimely Thoughts: A
Reconsideration of the Origins of Due Process of Law, 19 AJLH 265 (1975))
16
R. v. James, [1983] 36 S.A. St. R. 215, 223 (citing P.R. Glazebrook, Misprision of Felony—Shadow
or Phantom?, 8 AJLH 189 (1964))
Ronecast Caterers Pty. Ltd. v. Davis, [1981] 27 S.A. St. R. 392, 394 (citing Erwin C. Surrency, The
Courts in the American Colonies, 11 AJLH 253 (1967))
Skewes v. Veenhuizen, [1978] 20 S.A. St. R. 109, 126 (citing Erwin C. Surrency, The Courts in the
American Colonies, 11 AJLH 253 (1967))
Gilbertson v. South Australia, [1976] 15 S.A. St. R. 66, 103 (citing Joseph H. Smith & Leo
Hershkowitz, Courts of Equity in the Province of New York: The Cosby Controversy, 1732-1736,
16 AJLH 1 (1972))
FEDERATION OF CANADA
Canada v. Burt, 2000 CarswellNS 350 at ¶ 35 (citing William S. Fields & David T. Hardy, The Third
Amendment and the Issue of the Maintenance of Standing Armies: A Legal History, 35 AJLH 393
(1991))
Kindler v. Canada, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 779, 803 (Cory, J., dissenting) (citing Robert Zaller, The Debate
on Capital Punishment During the English Revolution, 31 AJLH 126 (1987))
Walton v. Hebb, [1984] N.W.T.R. 353 at ¶ 58 (citing Kenneth C.H. Willig, The Bar in the Third
Reich, 20 AJLH 1 (1976))
EUROPEAN COMMUNITY
In re Gasparini, [2007] 1 C.M.L.R. 12 at ¶ 56 (citing Jay A. Sigler, A History of Double Jeopardy, 7
AJLH 283 (1963))