12/7 Learning Target: I can analyze opinions on affirmative action. 1. Write the date and LT on the RIGHT hand side of your Interactive Notebook. Complete the Entry Task Below . Agenda: Entry Task Political Cartoons HW: Annotate Ogletree Ogletree Annotations Entry Task: Discuss 172-175. What was the outcome of Regents v. Bakke? How did the courts justify their decision? Key Concepts: Affirmative Action Regents v. Bakke U.of T. v. Fisher Brown II “With all deliberate speed…” Declared state laws segregating public schools unconstitutional. (Marked the beginning of intentional desegregation of facilities and was based on the idea that desegregation needed to be aided by the gov.) Affirmative Action -attempts to compensate for this country’s history of racial discrimination by giving some minority applicants a leg up -school admissions -job applications What is the message? What is the artist’s opinion? What is the message? What is the artist’s opinion? What is the message? What is the artist’s opinion? Fisher v. U. of T. -2013 Strict scrutiny ▪Decided that Fisher's only complaint could be "whether the University's decision to use race as an admissions factor 'was made in good faith.' ▪ The courts gave deference to the school. ▪ Probably would have ended Affirmative Action had the courts ruled differently. What are the benefits of a diverse education? How much diversity produces these benefits? Other Issues In a setting where there is a clear minority, is it right to assume that the minority represents their entire races viewpoint/experience? It is often argued that the language of education is "white." Minority students who attend university can sometimes be criticized by being "too white." Discussion Question for Wednesday: Should Affirmative Action legislation be repealed? ▪ In preparation for the discussion have: ▪ Notes from class and annotated texts. ▪ 3 discussion extension questions about race/civil rights issues that might contribute to your discussion of Affirmative Action. Charles Ogletree on Regents v. Bakke Densely annotate- Selection from “All Deliberate Speed” RALFY Save to Student Drive OR Google Docs. Add annotations in a different color. Charles Ogletree on Regents v. Bakke ▪ “So long as the admissions program does not constitute the type of quota system of “racial balancing” outlawed by Bakke, it may admit a “critical mass” of minority students in an effort to obtain a racially diverse student body. Educational institutions re permitted to use race as a factor (in the words of Bakke, quoted in Grutter as a “plus”) in minority admission, so land as the decision to admit the student is “flexible enough to ensure that each applicant is evaluated as an individual and not in away that makes and applicant’s race or ethnicity the defining feature of his or her application.”” Is this possible? Can one truly evaluate an individual as just that while still considering their race? How is race defined/viewed in this scenario, then? ▪ Almost like a cultural background/assumed to have a particular effect on your character. ▪ Is this always true?
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz