LINKS BETWEEN HYDROLOGY & GLACIER DYNAMICS GEOG 4750 Glacial processes, measurements & models Variations in water input affect basal water volume and pressure Accumulation zone: slow hydrological system: slow response Ablation zone: fast hydrological system: immediate response slow hydrological system: slow response Lecture 12 Glacier erosion(1) Erosional power Dr. Hester Jiskoot Basal sliding controlled by basal water pressure or volume? Surface velocity peaks in late spring to early summer Velocity variations too large to be explained by changes in mass-balanceinduced changes in basal stress. Æ Surface velocity variations caused by variations in basal sliding, not ice deformation Æ But local variations of basal sliding do not translate over large distances HYDRAULIC JACK EFFECT Observations: Nisqually glacier, Washington State (Hodge, 1974) Max sliding early in melt season Æ sliding speed = f(water volume) Findelengletscher, Swiss Alps (Iken et al., 1983) Storglaciären, Sweden (Jansson, 1995) Max sliding coincides with rising glacier surface: UPLIFT Æ water going into storage, rather than max storage Æ sliding speed = f(Pw) Columbia glacier, Alaska (Meier et al., 1994; Kamb et al., 1994) Iken and Bindschadler, 1986 Surface-velocity fluctuations correlated over a length of 7km and with borehole pressure upglacier Æ variations in sliding = f(amount of water stored at the bed) EROSIONAL POWER Basal sliding controlled by basal water pressure or volume? (Andrews, 1972) Models of basal cavitation (Lliboutry, 1968; Iken, 1981; Fowler, 1986; Kamb, 1987): Prediction: increase of basal storage with increase of pressure Observations: Sliding speed sometimes correlated with pressure, sometimes Total Power: Wt=τU Total power = shear stress x velocity (measured in watts= Joules per second) Shear stress ~ constant at a location Wt ∝ U with stored volume, BUT NOT WITH BOTH! Effective erosional power: Solution: Sliding speed (Ub) and basal storage controlled by Pw averaged over L (L= length scale over which basal stress is averaged by glacier dynamics) pw measured at a point is the sum of the mean Pw and the local p’w, where p’w is controlled by local reorganisation of the basal drainage system. We = part of Wt We / Wt related to the proportion of basal sliding to internal deformation If total U = basal sliding Æ then We / Wt=1 We / Wt ~ 0.5 for temperate glaciers and We / Wt < 0.1 for cold-based glaciers Æ Ub correlates with storage, but not with pw 1 Example: Glacier with area = 1 km2 width = 430 m (at firn line) thickness = 50 m (at firn line) U varies from 2-40 m/y Wt = 0.25-1.5 Watts We = 0.03-1.0 Watts EROSIONAL PROCESSES Abrasion: Abrasion: Particles at glacier base scour/drag over the rock surface: sandpaper effect. Rock flour evacuated by meltwater. http://gemini.oscs.montana.edu/~geol445/hyperglac/eroproc1/Erosional~process3.GIF Plucking and quarrying: Freeze on and dislocation of parts of bedrock by thaw/freeze Æ T base fluctuates around pressure melting point Makes use of pre-erosional jointing and fracturing Plucking and quarrying: http://gemini.oscs.montana.edu/~geol445/hyperglac/eroproc1/animated~plucking.gif Meltwater erosion: Sediment–laden meltwater abrades efficiently Æ suspended load Meltwater dissolves carbonates Æ solution load Shear strength of materials (Coulomb equation) For any material there is a critical stress to overcome the internal strength of the material (shear strength = resistive force that prevents permanent deformation) Shear strength = f (cohesion + intergranular friction) τ* = c + N tan φ Shear strength (N m-2) Shear strength = cohesion + (effective normal stress x coefficient of friction) τ* = c+ nφ N ta c Normal stress (N m-2) Material Cohesion Friction angle Sand Gravel Soft clay Stiff clay Till Soft sedimentary rock Igneous rock 0 0 30-70 70-150 150-250 1000-20000 35000-55000 32-46 34-48 27-32 30-32 32-35 25-35 35-45 ABRASION MODELS (1) Coulomb friction (Boulton, 1974; 1975; 1979) τ* = c + N tan φ Coulomb shear strength N = pi − Pw Effective pressure = ice overburden pressure – water pressure τ ' = ( pi − Pw) tan φ basal friction = f (Effective normal pressure x internal friction angle) Abrasion controlled by effective normal pressure (stress) and is inversely proportional to basal water pressure 2 ABRASION MODELS (2) Hallet friction (Hallet, 1979, 1981) So where does the ice move fastest towards the glacier base? Friction independent of ice thickness (independent of N or Pw) A = αDF n Abrasion rate=α (Number of particles in contact with the bed x Effective force)n α and n are constants related to the relative hardness of the bed and the particles Abrasion controlled by rate at which ice flows towards the bed Abrasion highest where a) basal melting is greatest b) below large heavy particles c) ice flows fastest towards bed ABRASION MODELS (3) Sandpaper friction (Schweizer & Iken, 1992) Debris rich basal ice layer Leverett Glacier W Greenland Valid for debris rich basal ice τ ' = ( pi − sPw) tan φ s = the proportion of the bed occupied by cavities ( 0 < s < 1 ) Similar to Coulomb model, but friction is a function of water pressure and area of the bed occupied by cavities SO WHAT IS THE BEST ABRASION MODEL? Coulomb friction EFFECTS OF EROSION Abrasion: Valid for friction between two rigid bodies Reasonable approximation:- rigid slabs of debris-rich basal ice Smoothing of surface and striations Elongated ridges and troughs in the flow direction - subglacial deforming layers without interstitial ice - particles are in direct in contact with bed (but air-or water-filled cavities possible under particle) Hallet friction Valid - when particles in glacier bed are spaced far apart - no contact between particles - ice ‘envelops’ particles - ice flowing around particles not influenced Sandpaper friction (Schweizer & Iken, 1992) Plucking and quarrying: Roughening of surface transverse to flow direction Localized Meltwater erosion: Localized smoothing of surface Soft sediment erosion: Folding and squeezing out of layers Short distance transport Valid for debris-rich basal ice (50 % by volume) 3 Striations, Haig glacier, Kananaskis Striations in front of Columbia glacier, Columbia Icefield Forefield of Columbia glacier, Columbia Icefield Crescentic gouges, West Greenland What is the ice flow direction? ‘Whalebacks’ with till layer, West Greenland Roche Moutonnée, Yosemite National Park, CA 4 Roche Moutonnée, Switzerland EROSION = f (GLACIER POWER & TIME GLACIATED) Mean glacial erosion rate = 1-5 mm/year Æ 1 km/million years Æ Quaternary glaciations 1-2 million years of glacial erosion Fjords in Ryfylke region, Norway Paternoster lakes, Carthew-Alderson, Waterton Erosion rates Average 1mm/year for small temperate glaciers Variation 0.1-40 mm/year Sediment transport for erosion rates <0.6 mm/yr Æ 700-22000 103 kg/year RANKING OF GLACIAL EROSIONAL MECHANISMS Erosion mode Cold base Melting base Hard rock Soft rock Abrasion 2 2 1 Plucking 1 1 2 Meltwater (mech) 3 3 Meltwater (chem) 4 4 ENTRAINMENT OF SEDIMENTS IN ICE Subglacial: Englacial/supraglacial: Regelation (onfreezing) Rockfall Ice-debris accretion Avalanches Block incorporation Atmospheric precipitation Overriding Aerosols and gases Squeezing and thrusting 1= highest, 4 = lowest From: Drewry, 1986 5
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz