109 Part II Chapter 4 Some big ones Hardy non-uniform volume changes in Herpes capsid We repeat the disk concept up to the big virus capsids. The Hermite functions are used for an accurate description of capsid structures. The plural structure of the Herpes capsid is discussed in connection with the effect of pressure in a non-uniform pentagonal space in biology. 4.1 Structure and some ‘big ones’ We conclude with some examples of what we have found to be important in this study of virus capsid structures. A. The chemical geometry on molecular level: The disk and the description of capsid structures with the Bragg morphotropic principles(ref 10). B. The nature of mathematics of the virus capsid. The mathematics of the exponential scale, finite and periodic GD functions. New mathematical methods for the description of capsid structures. C. Many new polyhedra found. A generalization of the polyhedron concept is given. Polyhedra in virus space have rectangular and triangular faces instead of square and hexagonal faces. Still in 53 or 53m symmetry. The important bilateral or reflective operation has been used to describe the majority of the pT=3, T=3, and T=4 capsid structures. The two enantiomorphs are intergrown in the capsid structure. Our mathematical descriptions in fig 3.3.4 and 3.3.11 from equations 3.3.2and 3.3.3 are in perfect agreement with corresponding virus structures. We say that this is an example of a bilateral or reflective operation. D. Duals and plurals. The volume changes. It is the disk concept from what we call chemical geometry that unifies the whole subject as described in part 1 of this essay. It goes straight through the extended polyhedral concept and the expansion of duality into plurality. It also makes it clear how to describe many very big ones. It is remarkable how more and more different disks form bigger and bigger asymmetric units. We are doing finite periodicity – or local Hardy translation in pentagonal space using four different Alhamra tilings that form the asymmetric unit of the Rice dwarf or Blue tongue capsid structures! Until the biggest of them all – the gigantic PBCV-1 by Rossman et al - with one kind of disk that is repeated with finite periodicity in pentagonal space, or local Hardy translation, to build blocks of a structure that is similar to other capsid structure types. This occurs on an icosahedral triangle to form the gigantic structure that can be described after the Bragg morphotropic principles(10). 110 We show below a short review that ends with these big structures. We repeat again some important parts – this is to make it convenient for the reader. And the important parts are the interwoven ensembles of asymmetric units and disks. We start with the BPMV disk in pT=3 and the 3 fold axis is obvious. Fig.4.1.1 BPMV pT=3 We continue with BMV from T=3, and again the disk has the 3 fold center of the capsid structure. Its swollen form is shown to be very similar to the disk of Bacteriophage Ga. Fig.4.1.2a BMV disk T=3 b Swollen disk of BMV c Bacteriophage Ga disk T=3 Coming to T=4 the disks are in the 2 fold centers of the capsid structure. Fig.4.1.3 Nudaurelia, T=4 Human Hepatitis T=4 Semliki T=4 For T=7 the asymmetric unit has become the disk which is then without symmetry. 111 Fig.4.1.4 Asymmetric unit and disk of the Simian capsid. T=7 Four different disks build the asymmetric unit of the Human Adenovirus. T=13 Four different triangular disks in fig 4.1.5 build the capsids for T13 IBDV and Rice dwarf or Blue tongue. Fig 4.1.5 Asymmetric unit for T13 IBDV Asymmetric unit for Rice dwarf or Blue tongue The asymmetric unit for Rice dwarf or Blue tongue forms a formidable net known as the Alhambra tilings, here in Hardy translation in pentagonal space net in fig 4.1.6a. Another model for this is the local hexagonal structure from Human Adenovirus in fig 4.1.6b below. Fig 4.1.6a The Alhambra net in Rice dwarf or Blue tongue b Human Adenovirus Two icosahedral triangles of almost crystallographic symmetry 112 In the gigantic PBCV-1 the disk as in Fig 4.1.7 is compared with the asymmetric unit in the Human Adeno virus. Such disks build triangular icosahedral surfaces after Hardy translation which are repeated after pentagonal symmetry to build the capsid. The detailed triangular icosahedral surface is organized after morphotropic methods using simpler units from a Human Adeno virus structure. Fig 4.1.7 a Disk in PBCV-1 b Part of asymmetric unit in the Human Adeno virus c Full asymmetric unit in the Human Adeno virus 4.2 Capsid structures related to the Human Adeno virus structure. The Hermites. With the new exponential mathematics,with the disk concept, with many new polyhedra, with topological relations between capsids, with common structure building principles that go from the smallest to the biggest capsids, with the plural concept and the volume variations, we have a good understanding of the intrinsic structure of viruses. The mathematical methods used have been extended into a new application of the Hermite functions as given here in equation 4.2.1. The harmonic oscillator is composed of a Gauss distribution function(damping), and a product of its n derivatives. To its nature the oscillator is a finite product and similar to our exponential functions. Physically it describes oscillation which of course contain finite periodicity. We introduce the dodecahedral symmetry and our ‘m’ below is just the n:th derivative of the Hermite function. And we shall see that ’the end justifies the means’: We obtain a most remarkable and accurate description of capsids as seen in figs 4.2.1a-j with the Bean Pod Mottle, Bacteriophage 174, Cosackie, Human Hepatitis and Human Adeno viruses in fig 4.2.1: (Ne N= ! 2 2 2 2 "1/2[(2# + 2)[x + y + z ] 1 2 2m (m ! )3 2 H[m,(# x + y)] H[m,(x + # y)] H[m,(y + # z)] H[m,(-# x + y)] H[m,(x - # y)] H[m,(y - # z)]) = const 4.2.1 113 Fig 4.2.1 a-j a m=1 icosahedron b Bean Pod Mottle e m=3 trunc icosahedron i m=5 new polyhedron f Coxsackie c m=2 icosidodecahedron d Bact phi 174 g m=4 Tri-pent-hex I h Herpes j Human Adenovirus Type 5 Figs 4.2.1a-j. The constants in the calculations are .05(m=5), .05(m=4), .05(m=3), .05(m=2) and .001(m=1). In the figures above we have used a single building element. A truncated triangle that grows in size with m. To describe the results of this beautiful Hermite mathematics in detail we need the generalization of the polyhedron concept we have found and described above. We also need the volume variation and the plurality. 114 We show the plurality for m=4 in fig 4.2.2a. The polyhedra are icosahedron(white), dodecahedron(yellow), icosidodecahedron(blue), the great rhombicosidodecahedron(red), Tri-pent-hex I(green).The red plural net is described by BPMV in chapter 3. Of course the volume change is also present. The volume change is in fig 4.2.2b for m=2 and the icosidodecahedron, and is very obvious for the plurals in red and blue, or the rhombicosidodecahedron and truncated dodecahedron. Fig 4.2.2a m=4 Plurality b m=2 const =.012 Volume change m=3 gives an important plural structure in fig 4.2.3 that agrees very well with the Bacteriophage alfa 3 in fig 4.2.4b. Some rotation and volume change are needed but nevertheless the agreement is impressive. Fig 4.2.3 m=3 115 Another important comparison is with the Bacteriophage KH 97 structure in fig 4.2.4a. The difference with the calculated picture from the Hermite function m=3, and the Bacteriophage alfa 3 structure is shown by the insertion of one more plural in Bacteriophage KH 97. This is marked with a truncated dodecahedron in green, and clearly, this accounts for the increase of size in capsid volume for the Bacteriophage KH 97. And we have again a splendid structural relationship between the two bacteriophages. Rotation and volume changes are there of course. Fig 4.2.4a Bacteriophage KH 97 b Bacteriophage alfa 3 4.3 Herpes and non-uniform volume changes The volume change for a Platonic solid is uniform. For an Archimedean polyhedron like the truncated icosahedron it can occur in two different manners, or steps as described above. One is the uniform change as for a Platonic solid. The other, we simply call it nonuniform, is simply related to truncation. As described above in 1.2. For bigger virus structures with more edges it turns complicated. We go directly to a virus like Herpes (ref 12) and study then the plural net as shown in fig 4.3.1a which contains five independent edges to vary (The plural net is n=7 in the Blue tongue series, Blue tongue itself is n=6). To this we add three edges from the Tri-pent-hex I polyhedron description of the virus capsid. Many are the different non-uniform capsid structures that can be imagined for complicated virus structures. (T=16 for Herpes). This means that there are great many possibilities for variations of capsid volumes. Small changes in the genome could be picked up by a plural as non-uniform changes. 116 Fig 4.3.1a Herpes capsid with the Blue Tongue net as plural b Calculated Hermite picture of Herpes after eq 4.2.1 m=4 Notice the structurally differences at different parts of the surfaces, due to non-uniform volume changes. 4.3.1c const=.1 d const =.012 With a given capsid is there any respond for a change in external pressure? Probably not for moderate changes. The capsid structure is relatively rigid. But a different thing is a change of pressure when the replication is on. ‘The growth cycle of poliovirus is extremely brief and extraordinarily efficient, the entire process is complete within 8 h, and yields in excess of 100,000 particles per cell are not uncommon’(ref 13). This is chemically and physically a very delicate process. I have discussed with Kåre Larsson the physical consequences of a change of pressure would have on a biological system. We propose that even a small change in pressure would have dramatic effects. During the replication, the plural structure, as the more sensitive, would respond to an instant change in volume in a non-uniform way. In 4.3.1a there is the normal Herpes structure with the plural in white hexagons. We have shown in fig 4.3.1b-d, which are Hermite calculations and which are in an astonishing agreement with the observed in white hexagons. There is however structural changes in the plural structure as caused by a change in the constant. Which is understood as a 117 sudden change in volume or pressure. From a detailed comparison in fig 4.3.1c-d it is obvious that the non-uniform volume changes vary in detailed parts of the surface-this is obviously due to structurally differences at different points. Another kind of Herpes virus – normally to the worse for the production of ordinary Herpes virus capsid – but to the better for us, has been formed due to a sudden change in pressure. An interesting aspect is that a small change of the volume of the genome could be transferred into the capsid structure as a metric change in the distance between the spikes(white hexagon net, with green spikes). With the finer details of structure using the plural concept for Herpes as an example, very small changes of volumes could give a great number of varieties. As it is natural to assume that the metric changes would occur ordered on the capsid surface. So why is the finite pentagonal symmetry so dominating? An obvious answer rests in the density difference between arrangements of bodies with pentagonal and crystallographic symmetry obvious from comparing the cube octahedron and the icosahedron. Their edge/inter-radius ratios are 2/ 3 and 5 -1. The replication occurs in a cell and the finite volume would have elevated pressure. This would favor pentagonal symmetry. So the answer is chemistry. ! of the ! structural variations with An important advantage might be that the number pentagonal symmetry is greatly superior. As beautifully demonstrated with the stellations, the compounds, the truncations, the non-convex polyhedra, see ref 11. And also the extension of the polyhedra and the plural concepts add to the richness of variations for pentagonal symmetry. We have the parallels in the crystallographic world with the snub cube, the small and the great rhombicuboctahedra, etc. But the manifold does not seem to be there with the stellations etc.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz