LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1: Map showing location of intensive study area- Aligarh. ® Figure 2.2: Mean monthly temperature, humidity and rainfall in the year 2005. Figure 2.3: Mean monthly temperature, humidity and rainfall in the year 2006. Figure 2.4: Mean monthly temperature, humidity and rainfall in the year 2007. Figure 4.1: Percent cambial rays in Anthocephalus cadamba (short, medium, tall). Figure 4.2: Percent cambial rays in Madhuca indica (short, medium, tall). Figure 4.3: Percent cambial rays in Anthocephalus cadamba (Uniseriate, biseriate, multiseriate). Figure 4.4: Percent cambial rays in Madhuca indica (Uniseriate, biseriate, multiseriate). Figurt- 4.5: Percent tangential area (Cambium) in Anthocephalus cadamba. Figure 4.6: Percent tangential area (Cambium) in Madhuca indica. Figure 4.7: Percent cambial rays in Anthocephalus cadamba along the tree axis of varying girth (short, medium, tall). Figure 4.8: Percent cambial rays in Madhuca indica along the tree axis of varying girth (short, medium, tall). Figure 4.9: Percent cambial rays in Anthocephalus cadamba along the tree axis of varying girth (Uniseriate, biseriate, multiseriate). Figure 4.10: Percent cambial rays in Madhuca indica along the tree axis of varying girth (Uniseriate, biseriate, multiseriate). Figure 4.11: Percent tangential area (Cambium) oi Anthocephalus cadamba along the tree axis of varying girth. Figure 4.12: Percent tangential area (Cambium) of Madhuca indica along the tree axis of varying girth Figure 4.13: Percent vessel size in Anthocephalus cadamba along the tree axis of varying girth (small, medium, large). Figure 4.14: Percent vessel size in Madhuca indica along the tree axis of varying girth (small, medium, large). Figure 4.15: Percent transectional area of Xylem components in Anthocephalus cadamba along the tree axis of varying girth. Figure 4.16: Percent transectional area of Xylem components in Madhuca indica along the tree axis of varying girth. Figure 4.17: Percent Xylem rays of Anthocephalus cadamba alony the tree axis of varying girth (short, medium, large). Figure 4.18: Percent Xylem rays of Madhuca indica along the tree axis of varying girth (short, medium, large). Figure 4.19: Percent Xylem rays of Anthocephalus cadamba (Uniseriate, biseriate, multiseriate). Figure 4.20: Percent Xylem rays of Madhuca indica (Uniseriate, biseriate, multiseriate). Figure 4.21: Percent tangential area (Xylem rays) along the tree axis of varying girth. Figure 4.22: Percent Xylem rays of Anthocephalus cadamba (short, medium, tall). Figure 4.23: Percent Xylem rays of Madhuca indica (short, medium, tall). Contents vi Figure 4.24: Percent Xylem rays oi Anthocephalus cadamba (Uniseriate, biseriate, multiseriate). Figure 4.25: Percent Xylem rays of Madhuca indica (Uniseriate, biseriate, multiseriate). Figure 4.26: Percent tangential area xylem rays. Figure 4.27: Percent transectional area xylem components of Anthocephalus cadamba. Figure 4.28: Percent transectional area xylem components of Madhuca indica. Figure 4.29: Percent conducting phloem rays of/\r7t/7ocep/)o/uscodomfco along the tree axis of varying girth. Figure 4.30: Percent conducting phloem rays of Madhuca indica along the tree axis of varying girth. Figure 4.31: Percent conducting phloem rays of Anthocephalus cadamba along the tree axis of varying girth. Figure 4.32: Percent conducting phloem rays of Madhuca indica along the tree axis of varying girth. Figure 4.33: Percent transectional area of conducting phloem components of Anthocephalus cadamba along the tree axis of varying girth. Figure 4.34: Percent transectional area of conducting phloem components of Madhuca indica along the tree axis of varying girth. Figure 4.35: Percent tangential ray area in conducting and non-conducting phloem along the tree axis of varying girth. Figure 4.36: Percent conducting phloem rays of Anthocephalus cadamba (short, medium, tall). Figure 4.37: Percent conducting phloem rays of Madhuca indica (short, medium, tall). Figure 4.38: Percent conducting rays in secondary phloem of Anthocephalus cadamba (Uniseriate, biseriate, multiseriate). Figure 4.39: Percent conducting rays in secondary phloem of Madhuca indica (Uniseriate, biseriate, multiseriate). Figure 4.40: Percent non-conducting phloem rays of Anthocephalus cadamba (short, medium, tali). Figure 4.41: Percent non-conducting phloem rays of Madhuca indica (short, medium, tall). Figure 4.42: Percent rays in non-conducting phloem of Anthocephalus cadamba (Uniseriate, biseriate, multiseriate). Figure 4.43: Percent rays in non-conducting phloem of Madhuca indica (Uniseriate, biseriate, multiseriate). Figure 4.44: Percent transectional area in conducting pliloem of Anthocephalus cadamba. Figure 4.45: Percent transectional area in conducting phloem of Madhuca indica. Figure 4.46: Percent tangential area of conducting phloem. Figure 4.47: Percent tangential area of non-conducting phloem. Figure 4.48: Annual production of cambial derivatives in Anthocephalus cadamba in relation to temperature and humidity. Figure 4.49: Annual production of cambial derivatives in Madhuca indica in relation to temperature and humidity. Figure 4.50: Periodicity of cambium, xylem and phloem production. Contents vil
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz