Prediction of high viscosity twophase flows with LedaFlow Jørn Kjølaas, SINTEF Contents Heavy oil - background Experimental data with viscous oils LedaFlow 1D predictions LedaFlow Q3D predictions Conclusions 2 Heavy oil - background Easily accessible light crude oil is slowly running out Off-shore production is moving to much deeper waters (expensive) Heavy oil is available at much lower depth (relatively cheap) There is much more heavy than light oil (i.e. Venezuela) Difficult to produce High viscosity (up to 100 Pa.s) Generally high sulfur and heavy metal content Refining process is expensive Accurate flow predictions are needed for proper design of viscous oil transport facilities. 3 LedaFlow A next generation tool for prediction of multiphase pipeline flows – from well to processing facility. Project vision: develop step change technology for pipeline design, operation, training and trouble-shooting. Key model features: WHP 1D 1D Point model 1D pipeline model Special models (wells, valves, etc.) Profile model (cross-section) Q3D Q3D Down Comer Q3D Riser 1D Q3D Q3D multidimensional model Networks of 1D and Q3D pipe segments Q3D Thermal and compositional modeling 4 LedaFlow Validation data obtained at SINTEF’s lab at Tiller (Trondheim) Until recently, the main focus has been on light oils (condensate) The focus has now shifted towards viscous oils 5 Experimental data with viscous oils (gas-oil) 6 Experimental data (gas-oil) Gockal (2008) 173 data points Horizontal pipe 50mm diameter Air + viscous oil (o=200-600 cP) Atmospheric pressure Courtesy of TULSA University SINTEF Medium Scale data (FACE++) 421 data points Horizontal pipe 69mm diameter NexBase + SF6 (o=100 cP) NexBase/Exxsol mixture + SF6 (o=35 cP) 4 and 8 bar pressure (g=26, 46 kg/m3) LDA measurements 7 Experimental data (gas-oil) IFE FACE in-kind data set (Statoil) 250 data points =0º, 1º, 5º 100mm diameter o=70-160 cP 8 bar pressure (g=45 kg/m3) SINTEF Large Scale Campaign (2012) 788 data points =0º, 0.5º, 90º Top view 189mm diameter NexBase + N2 (o=100 cP) 20, 45, 85 bar pressure (g=25, 50, 95 kg/m3) LDA measurements Proprietary data (not available) Side view 8 LedaFlow 1D 9 LedaFlow 1D SINTEF MS single phase data: The transition from laminar to turbulent flow sets in earlier than what is reported by other authors. This can probably be attributed to disturbances in the process that generate turbulence. The laminar-turbulent transition is often important in high-viscosity systems, and this transition has a significant impact on the gasliquid flow regime. A particular challenge is to correctly predict this transition in stratified flow. 10 LedaFlow 1D SINTEF MS data (100 cP): The flow regime predictions are incorrect in some cases. LedaFlow SLUG LedaFlow STRAT 11 LedaFlow 1D SINTEF MS data: The flow regime predictions are very important with viscous oils! 12 LedaFlow 1D SINTEF MS data (35 cP): The flow regime predictions are perhaps a little better for 35 cP than at 100 cP. LedaFlow SLUG LedaFlow STRAT 13 LedaFlow 1D SINTEF Medium Scale 35 cP data: The overall predictions are quite reasonable. The flow regimes are better predicted than at 100 cP. The penalty for erroneous flow regime is less severe. 14 LedaFlow Q3D 15 LedaFlow Q3D All equations are derived in 3-dimensions and then averaged over horizontal slices Three fluid and 9-field model Solves turbulence transport equations for all phases. Calculates transition from separated to dispersed flow and vice versa. Compressible N-field flow solver Solves for both straight and curved pipes 16 LedaFlow Q3D (3) Pipe geometry can be curved Adds terms in momentum balance (centrifugal force, etc.) a b c d 17 Viscous oil simulations Simulation parameters Based on experiment by Gokcal et al. (2008)2 g = 1.13/1.2 kg.m-3, l = 889 kg.m-3 g = 1.87E-05 Pa.s, l = 0.181/0.587 Pa.s = 0.02 N.m-1 Wall roughness = 10 m L = 40/60 m, D = 0.0508 m, = 0o Grid: 200 x 20 cells (length x height) Inlet: g = 0.5, l = 0.5, Us,g = 0.1/0.5/1.0/2.0 m/s, Us,l = 0.5 m/s tmax=0.01 sec; CFL=0.5 Constant particle size (3 mm droplets, 1 mm bubbles) 2 B. Gokcal et al. (2008), SPE projects facilities and construction 18 Viscous oil (2) Usg=0.5 (pipe diameter is magnified x50) 1.0 (x50) 5.0 (x75) 10.0 (x75) 19 Viscous oil (3) High viscosity (0.587 Pa.s) Pressure gradient 7000 dPdX (Pa/m) 6000 5000 4000 Experiment 3000 LedaFlow 2000 1000 0 0 1 2 3 Usg (m/s) 4 5 6 Viscous oil (4) "Low" viscosity (0.181 Pa.s) 3000 Pressure gradient dPdX (Pa/m) 2500 2000 1500 Experiment 1000 LedaFlow‐Lvisc 500 0 0 1 2 3 Usg (m/s) 4 5 6 Conclusions In recent years, due to the increasing interest in heavy oil production, a lot of viscous-oil experimental data has been produced. We have compared the predictions of LedaFlow 1D (which has been developed using low viscosity data) to some viscous oil data sets. Some challenges have been identified: The flow regime predictions are critical, because slugs have a huge impact on the pressure drop (for low-viscosity oils, the penalty for getting the flow regime wrong is much less severe). There are also challenges with regards to the determination of laminar/turbulent flow. This is however not straight-forward in stratified flow. These and other challenges will soon be addressed in a model development activity targeted at improving the predictions in viscous flows. This is now possible since we have a lot of experimental data. LedaFlow Q3D provides good results for viscous oil flows, and will be used to obtain improved insight into these situations. 22 Thank you for your attention! 23
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz