Tuning Investigations Stave 4 T. Ince, J. Jentzsch, C. Lapoire, L. Marx IFE-I4 Testing Meeting July 8, 2013 Stave 4 cold tuning, 3000/2500/2000/1500e- tuning ‣ focusing on bad module C7-1 threshold noise Lynn Marx - University of Washington 2 July 3, 2013 1500e- tuning when doing iterations on C7-1, threshold/noise/FDAC does not get better ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ TDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE (12021) Lynn Marx - University of Washington 3 July 3, 2013 1500e- tuning when doing iterations on C7-1, threshold/noise/FDAC does not get better ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ TDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE ‣ FDAC_TUNE (12027) Lynn Marx - University of Washington 4 July 3, 2013 1500e- tuning when doing iterations on C7-1, threshold/noise/FDAC does not get better ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ TDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE ‣ FDAC_TUNE ‣ TDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ FDAC_TUNE (12031) Lynn Marx - University of Washington 5 July 3, 2013 1500e- tuning why can threshold change by so much if only doing IF_TUNE? GDAC_FAST_RETUNE IF_TUNE Lynn Marx - University of Washington 6 July 3, 2013 TDAC vs FDAC Comparing 3000e- and 2500e-: tdac / fdac distribution gets narrower / wider ‣ Why does this happen? Are they related (does threshold cause FDAC to get wider)? tdac 3000e- tdac 2500e- fdac 3000e- fdac 2500e- why always right-biased? Lynn Marx - University of Washington 7 July 3, 2013 FDAC map C7-1 is from batch 2 ‣ why local dependencies? http://dpnc.unige.ch/atlas/upgrade/IBL/StaveLoading/Production/Stave4/Stave4ModuleMap.pdf Lynn Marx - University of Washington 8 July 3, 2013 BACKUP Lynn Marx - University of Washington 9 July 3, 2013 Source scan no topological correlation to FDAC map ‣ probably no disconnected bumps Lynn Marx - University of Washington 10 July 3, 2013 1500e- tuning when doing iterations on A4-1 (~bad), threshold/noise/FDAC does not get better ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ TDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE (12021) Lynn Marx - University of Washington 11 July 3, 2013 1500e- tuning when doing iterations on A4-1 (~bad), threshold/noise/FDAC does not get better ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ TDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE ‣ FDAC_TUNE (12027) Lynn Marx - University of Washington 12 July 3, 2013 1500e- tuning when doing iterations on A4-1 (~bad), threshold/noise/FDAC does not get better ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ TDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE ‣ FDAC_TUNE ‣ TDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ FDAC_TUNE (12031) Lynn Marx - University of Washington 13 July 3, 2013 1500e- tuning when doing iterations on A1-1 (good), threshold/noise/FDAC does not get better ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ TDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE (12021) Lynn Marx - University of Washington 14 July 3, 2013 1500e- tuning when doing iterations on A1-1 (good), threshold/noise/FDAC does not get better ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ TDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE ‣ FDAC_TUNE (12027) Lynn Marx - University of Washington 15 July 3, 2013 1500e- tuning when doing iterations on A1-1 (good), threshold/noise/FDAC does not get better ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE ‣ GDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ TDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ IF_TUNE ‣ FDAC_TUNE ‣ TDAC_FAST_RETUNE ‣ FDAC_TUNE (12031) Lynn Marx - University of Washington 16 July 3, 2013 Step size variations Stave 04, cold tuning, 1500e- threshold ‣ focusing on bad module C7-1 FdacVbn from 20 to 30 Lynn Marx - University of Washington 17 July 3, 2013
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz