Swedish Public Health Policy Focus on social determinants and multisectoral interventions Bernt Lundgren, Public Health Policy Expert, Swedish National Institute of Public Health (SNIPH) WWW.fhi.se Lecture about Swedish Public Health Policy, Netherlands Embassy, Stockholm, 3rd of October 2007 Purpose and content • Sweden – society and health. • Origins of the new Swedish public health policy. • The Swedish Public Health Policy. • Implementation – many players are responsible. • Clouds on the health sky. • Proposals relating to health threats and capacity. • Summary and Conclusions. Bernt Lundgren 2007 Sweden – society and health 9 million people, 12% born abroad. A mixed economy, a big public sector and a universal welfare system. GDP per capita is about 29 500 euro (274 000 SEK, rate 9.3 ) The level of total social benefits is about 33% of GDP. Three levels of government with the power to tax: the state, 21 county councils and 290 local authorities (municipalities). Bernt Lundgren 2007 Average lifespan in Sweden 1751-2000 100 60 Females Males 40 80 20 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 79 181 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 198 199 199 200 1 51 791 816 841 851 861 871 881 891 901 911 921 931 941 951 961 971 981 986 991 996 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Life expectancy at birth (Source WHO World Health report 2001) 100 80 60 Males Females 40 20 0 Afganistan USA Australia Russia South Africa India Sierra Leone Vietnam Sweden Franc Infant mortality in Sweden Probality of dying during the first life-year (number per 1000 born). 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Gunnar Ågren 2004 Percentage of daily smokers, 16-84 years, 1980-2002 Andel dagligrökare Males Females 40 Män 30 Kvinnor 20 10 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 June 1st 2005 – smoking was prohibited in restaurants Källa: Undersökningen av levnadsförhållanden, SCB Proportion of daily smokers Blue-collar workers Lower non-manual employees Intermediate and higher non-manual employees 0 5 10 15 20 25 Per cent Men Women Source: Swedish National Institute of Public Health 2004 Origins of the new Swedish public health policy In the 1980´s - increasing costs for health care – a disproportionate amount to highly specialized hospital care. A need to emphasize prevention. HIV/AIDS illustrated the need for a comprehensive preventive strategy. Increasing concern about inequity in health. A strategy group on public health in the government administration was formed in 1987. Swedish National Institute of Public Health founded 1992. Bernt Lundgren 2007 Stimulus from international work about prevention and health promotion • Lalonde Report 1974 • Alma-Ata Resolution 1976 – emphasis on primary care • Health for all by the year 2000 – 1981 • Ottawa charter 1986 The National Committee for Public Health 1997-2000 • Appointed by the government. • All main political parties were represented and a number of experts and NGO:s. • Main task 1: to propose national public health goals and strategies to guide public health work sector-wide, with special focus on reducing inequities in health. • Main task 2: to “politicize” the public health issue. Bernt Lundgren 2007 Final report: ”Health on Equal Terms– National Goals for Public Health” Six overarching strategies. 18 national goals for public health, 50 subgoals. The goals were expressed in terms of determinants of health. A number of indicators for each goal. Time horizon – 2010. Bernt Lundgren 2007 The Swedish public health policy On the 16th of April 2003 The Parliament approved the government white paper, ”Public health objectives” (prop. 2002/03:35). It stress the need for a long-term, goal-oriented and multisectoral public health work. Focus a better co-ordination and a rising knowledge of the collected effects of interventions. Bernt Lundgren 2007 One overarching national public health aim: The aim is: “ to create social conditions that will ensure good health, on equal terms, for the entire population”. Equity in health has a high priority. The overall aim shall be achieved by implementing initiatives in 31 policy areas related to 11 domains of objectives. Bernt Lundgren 2007 Focus on equity and equality • Improve the health situation for those with the worst health – an equity and gender equality perspective. • Focus on certain vulnerable groups: o Children and adolescents o Elderly o Persons with disabilities o Immigrants o HBT (homosexual, bisexual and transgender) persons. Bernt Lundgren 2007 Eleven domains of objectives 1. Participation and influence in society. 2. Economic and social security. 3. Secure and favourable conditions during childhood and adolescence. 4. Healthier working life. 5. Healthy and safe environments and products. 6. A more health-promoting health service. 7. Effective prevention against communicable diseases. 8. Safe sexuality and good reproductive health. 9. Increased physical activity. 10. Good eating habits and safe food. 11. Reduced use of tobacco and alcohol, a society free from illicit drugs and doping and a reduction in the harmful effects of excessive gambling. Bernt Lundgren 2007 Environment Public economic strategies Traffic Agriculture & foodEduca-stuff tion Illicit drugs Housing Employment Alcohol ? Tobacco Social Work support environment Sex & life together Leisure & culture Eating habits Social network Age, sex, heredity Socialinsurance § Physical activity Sleep Contact habits children and adults Social assistance Health-& medical care Implementation - many players are responsible! Interventions within 31 policy areas. National authorities shall consider the effects on public health of their activities and follow up their work. Local authorities and county councils shall develop cooperation and coordination of their public health work. A national steering group for public health issues has been established under the leadership of the Minister of Public Health. Bernt Lundgren 2007 Swedish National Institute of Public Health (SNIPH) - three principal functions Centre of excellence about public health issues for the Government and its agencies and for regions, county councils and municipalities. Monitor the implementation of the national public health policy. Supervision in areas of alcohol, tobacco and drugs. Bernt Lundgren 2007 Keys to a good implementation Clear signals from the government and from other political bodies (through legislation or other steering mechanisms). Support to players outside the health service to identify their public health role. A more health-promoting health service. Bernt Lundgren 2007 Identify the public health role Players must: • make clear which determinants that are important and for which groups • establish indicators • act on the determinants • monitor the effect of the interventions • suggest new steering mechanisms and interventions • report to stakeholders Bernt Lundgren 2007 A more health-promoting health service In Sweden: A tradition of good preventative efforts within maternity and antenatal welfare, receptions for youth, and school and occupational health service. HS in general must be more health-oriented; i.a. advise on lifestyle factors and also use other methods than pharmaceuticals. HS must have a good knowledge of social determinants of health and methods of prevention. Bernt Lundgren 2007 Implementation – the national level • A number of central and regional government authorities have been asked to describe their roles as regards public health. • Many of them point out that their activities affect the health situation of many people. However, the effects are often indirect which makes them complicated to follow-up. Bernt Lundgren 2007 Implementation - regional and local level • Municipalities are responsible for activities which affect a number of health determinants, e.g. social services, childcare, planning and building issues, etc. • Municipalities are reasonably well organised for public health work. Clear improvements during the last decade. • All county councils – running the health service - have adopted a public health action plan, often in cooperation with municipalities or county administrative boards. Bernt Lundgren 2007 Implementation and monitoring of the National Public Health Policy Public Health Policy Report Interventions Effects HealthCorrelation Determinants outcomes I n f o system Monitoring Indicators Public Health Report Bosse Pettersson, 2002 Public Health Policy Report 2005 Show: Determinants for health and indicators. The implementation of the public health policy on national, regional and local level. Propose: New actions. Aim: Basis for the Governments communication to the Parliament. Bernt Lundgren 2007 Collection of basic data for PHPR 2005 • Update of research findings on the correlations between determinants and health • 42 determinants, 36 principal indicators and 47 subindicators • Public statistics and SNIPH investigations • Reports from 22 national state agencies • Visits to 8 (of 21) county administrative boards • A questionnaire to all municipalities (290) • Interviews with all county councils (21) Four clouds on the health sky Overweight Poor mental health Alcohol High absenteeism due to illness BMI, males and females 16-74 years, 1980-2002 Medel-BMI 26 25,5 25 24,5 Män 24 23,5 Kvinnor 23 1980 1989 Källa: Undersökningen av levnadsförhållanden, SCB 1998 2001 The Swedish alcohol consumption Litres 100% alcohol/inhabitant 10 Sweden entered EU 9 8 7 6 5 1990 1993 1995 1996 1998 2000 2001 2002 PROPORTION OF MEN AND WOMEN WHO EXPERIENCE ANXIETY OR WORRY PRESCRIPTION OF DRUGS AGAINST DEPRESSIONS Million doses per day 6 per cent of the Swedish people use antidepressants. In the highest age groups the proportion is 15—20 per cent. Increase in workrelated sick-leave especially among women Absent from work for more than 30 days De stora sociala Thousands 200 180 skillnaderna i hälsa 160 140 120 100 80 Den 60 kraftigt ökande 40 arbetsrelaterade ohälsan 20 0 Males Females Brist på fysisk aktivitet i kombination med dålig kost 74 977 980 983 986 989 992 995 998 001 9 1 1 1 1 1 Ökning 1 1av alkohol 1 1 2 och andra droger 800.000 persons outside the labour market because of sick-leave or early retirement = 14% of people in working ages. Gunnar Ågren 2003 Inequality in health Henrik Moberg, maj 2006 Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval of adverse social and economic consequences among persons with limiting longstanding illness compared with persons without limiting longstanding illness stratified for socioeconomic position, adjusted for age, sex, marital state, being foreign born and living region. Source: Lindholm et al. Class difference in the social consequences of health. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002;56:188–192 Determinants of social inequities in health 1. Different levels of power and resources 2. Different levels of exposure to health hazards 3. The same level of exposures leading to differential impacts 4. Life course effects 5. Different social and economic effects of sickness Proposals relating to health threats • Reduce social inequality through a strong universal welfare policy. • Strengthen labour market policy initiatives for the long-term unemployed. • Combat discrimination by disseminating more knowledge about its negative health impact. Bernt Lundgren 2007 Proposals relating to health threats II • Create scope for greater influence for those living in vulnerable districts over the development of their own districts and their living conditions. • Develop supportive environments for health, i.e. accessible and safe cycle paths, footpaths, green areas and housing areas. Bernt Lundgren 2007 Proposals relating to health threats III • Make freedom from gender-related violence a new sub-goal of the public health policy. • Develop measures to limit availability of alcohol beverages; restaurant owners, pub landlords, retailers and parents are key target groups. • Adapt tobacco cessation to suit different target groups and make it available to all those in need of support. Bernt Lundgren 2007 Proposals relating to capacity • Take new steps in the development of public health policy, infrastructure and practice on the regional level. • Focus on skills development for municipalities and county councils. • Give health as an economic growth factor a central place in community planning. • Use health impact assessments (HIA) more and regulate the method in the same way as environmental impact assessments. Bernt Lundgren 2007 Public health policy for equality in health and sustainable development (communication 2005/06:205) • The first follow-up of the “Public health objectives bill” (2002/03:35) in the form of a government communication to the Riksdag. • Basic data: Public health report, Public health policy report, considerations by relevant actors, letters and proposals after the Public health policy report, current policies. The Swedish public health policy remains in place (com. 2005/06:205) • One overarching national aim • Domains of objectives • ”The evaluation cycle” • Determinants • Indicators • A spread responsibility • Interventions that combat the most common health problems and inequality in health Key points (communication 2005/06:205) • More work on indicators needed. • HIA and health economic analysis important. • Continued implementation: ”Role assignment” to 22 national and 21 regional state agencies during 2004-2006, ”HIA task” to 13 national and 21 regional agencies in 2005-2007. • No consensus on coordinated regional public health promotion among county councils and county administrative boards. More discussion needed. Signals from the new Swedish government elected in September 2006 •Previous government communication to the Riksdag retracted, but no change in public health policy. • More focus on the domains of objectives related to children, the health service and health behaviours (domains 3, 6, 8-11). • More focus on actors in civil society. Summing up: Experiences from the Swedish public health policy Determinants approach in general well understood and emphasizes the role of other sectors in public health. Use of indicators is of key importance. Support to actors outside the health service needed to identify their public health role. Transfer of ownership! Continuous steering from the government and other political bodies is of vital importance. Public health promotion on the regional level needs higher level of coordination. Municipalities need more skills development. The new Swedish government does not intend to change the public health policy.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz