Shallow cumulus : cloud-subcloud layer interaction and the role of water vapour Fleur Couvreux, Phil Austin BOMEX HUM3B ARM E1120 September 2006 Cumulus characteristics Inferred from observations : Stommel 1947 : significant mixing with environment Squires 1958: evidence of downdrafts Austin et al. 1985: strong heterogeneity in the cloud radar Kollias et al. (2001) Updraft=5 m/s, downdraft=-3 m/s spectral width: turbulence Cumulus characteristics Inferred from observations : Stommel 1947 : significant mixing with environment Squires 1958: evidence of downdrafts Austin et al. 1985: strong heterogeneity in the cloud No observation of initiation (small spatial and temporal scales) radar No observation to study the interaction between the cloud layer and the subcloud layer Kollias et al. (2001) Updraft=5 m/s, downdraft=-3 m/s spectral width: turbulence Cumulus characteristics Inferred from LES: - Constraint for the entrainment rate (Siebesma and Cuijpers 1995) ~10-3 - Understanding cloud characteristics (Neggers et al. 2002) - Description of transport inside cumulus (Zhao and Austin 2005) : pulsating, indirect transport, life cycle (dissipation) - Neggers et al. 2002 Cumulus characteristics Inferred from LES: - Constraint for the entrainment rate (Siebesma and Cuijpers 1995) ~10-3 - Understanding cloud characteristics (Neggers et al. 2002) - Description of transport inside cumulus (Zhao and Austin 2005) : pulsating, indirect transport, life cycle (dissipation) A look at individual clouds : to study the life cycle of the cloud A closer look at the relation between the subcloud layer and the cloud layer - Neggers et al. 2002 Importance of humidity variability Boundary layer humidity : Mahrt 1976: LCL sensitivity to small changes in humidity Crook 1996: sensitivity of cloud initiation to qsfce Weckwerth et al. 2000: CIN threshold if wv variability taken into account Importance of humidity variability Boundary layer humidity : Mahrt 1976: LCL sensitivity to small changes in humidity Crook 1996: sensitivity of cloud initiation to qsfce Weckwerth et al. 2000: CIN threshold if wv variability taken into account Tropospheric humidity: Derbyshire et al. 2004: sensitivity to rh of mass flux profiles -> deep Loijen, de Roode 2005: shallow Loijen & de Roode 2005 Derbyshire et al. 2004 90% 70% 50% 25% water vapour role evident but need to be better understood std -0.2 -0.4 +0.4 +0.7 Our focus Questions : ● What controls cloud initiation? •What is the relevance of the water vapour variability in the BL? ● What are the interactions between clouds and the subcloud layer? ● What controls cloud organisation (not looking at wind as for rolls) ? ● How does the cloud environment impact the cloud ? -> humidity Methodology : LES simulations : individual clouds and then total domain Overview : ● Cloud base characteristics through the cloud life cycle ● Subcloud layer characteristics at initiation ● Modification of subcloud layer during the cloud life cycle ● Role of water vapour Methodology : LES Advantages : - to address the lack of observations (cloud-subcloud layer interaction) - cloud realism : fractal dimension, cloud size distribution (Siebesma and Jonker 2000, Neggers et al. 2003) - simultaneous 3D fields of different variables at high resolution cloud+rv(0.4km) cloud+w(0.4km) Available simulations : - six isolated clouds in BOMEX simulation (Zhao and Austin, 2005) - ~6 cases : LES BOMEX, ARM and IHOP cases (modification of initial profiles, stability and humidity, in order to get different cloud cover) The six clouds (Zhao and Austin 2005) 3 small clouds and 3 large clouds : same cld base, diff. cld top spatial and temporal resolution x=25m, t=1.5s Cld top wmax Cld base small clouds: height ~ 500 m hal L< 200 m 1 updraft life time~1000s large clouds: height ~ 1000 m hal L~ 400 m 2-3 pulse-like updrafts life time ~ 1500s wmin A Zhao and Austin (2005) B C D E F Cloud base caracteristics at initiation Narrow distribution at initiation except for w': l'~min,qt'~max, v'~0 qt'~max v'~0 (%) l'~min (%) (%) (g/kg) (K) w~1m/s (%) (m/s) (K) cloud A cloud B small clouds cloud C cloud D large clouds cloud E cloud F Standard deviation Cloud base characteristics after initiation Variation of the distribution through the life cycle of the clouds: ex: cloud A qt'~max v'~0 l'~min (%) (%) (%) (g/kg) (K) w~1m/s (%) (m/s) same results for other clouds (K) t=0s t=180s t=360s t=450s t=540s t=720s t=870s Cloud base characteristics in LES Wider distribution but similar characteristics : l~min,qt~max, v'~0 qt~max thl~min thv'~0 w~2m/s =0.8 g/kg =0.1 K =0.05 K =0.3 m/s =1 g/kg =0.2 K =0.06 K =1 m/s l'<0 v'~0 w'>0 rv'>0 Cloud base characteristics at initiation Cloud D,E,F -> larger clouds have wider perturbations but same intensity at initiation perturbation size evolution at cloud base large clouds small clouds Determination of the height of cloud from initiation? Subcloud layer characteristics Characteristics at cloud initiation w (m/s) l (K) * every column *cloudy column <q>BL (kg/kg) e (K) d<w'q'>/dz (kg/kg/s) <q>BL (kg/kg) Cloud C Criteria: moist and ascending positive div(wqt) <w'q'> (kg/kg.m/s) <q>BL (kg/kg) Subcloud layer characteristics Evolution with time: criteria of initiation only during the first 3-4 minutes w w (m/s) (m/s) <q>BL (kg/kg) e (K) (K) d<w'q'>/dz (kg/kg/s) <q>BL (kg/kg) w w (m/s) (m/s) <q>BL (kg/kg) e cloud C d<w'q'>/dz (kg/kg/s) e e (K) (K) d<w'q'>/dz (kg/kg/s) <q>BL (kg/kg) cloud C w w e (m/s) e (m/s) (K) (K) d<w'q'>/dz (kg/kg/s) Cloud C d<w'q'>/dz (kg/kg/s) d<w'q'>/dz (kg/kg/s) Dry thermals/”cloudy” thermals Thermodynamical properties of the dry thermals versus cloudy thermal (conditional sampling on w' and cld col) z (m) z (m) mean std deviation q l (K) (g/kg) z (m) z (m) v (K) w (m/s) A(cld thermals)~0.1 A(dry thermals)~0.3 “Cloudy” thermals moister and faster in the upper half of the boundary layer Dry thermals/cldy thermals: ind. clds qt qt cloud B (m) cloud D Same conclusions: moister and faster in the upper boundary layer + evidence of vertical transport of moisture (m) (g/kg) dry thermals cld thermals 0 2' 4' 6' 8' 10' w (g/kg) cloud B w cloud D (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) Moisture flux enhancement under clouds Enhancement of water vapour flux in the 1/3 upper BL wqt wl wv BOMEX: cloudD mean profile contribution according to cloud fraction under cld contribution assymetry between moisture and temperature (g/kg.m/s) (K.m/s) (K.m/s) Moisture flux enhancement under clouds Enhancement of water vapour flux in the 1/3 upper BL wqt wv wl BOMEX: cloudD mean profile contribution according to cloud fraction under cld contribution assymetry between moisture and temperature (g/kg.m/s) (K.m/s) wqt (g/kg.m/s) (K.m/s) wl (K.m/s) wv (K.m/s) LES: ARM 6h mean profile contribution according to cloud fraction under cld contribution cld contribution ~no impact on temperature flux (wl and wv) Evolution of the moisture flux below ind. clds Mean flux under clouds / Flux contribution from under clouds cloudcloud B : mean B : flux fluxcontribution cloud B : mean flux 30s 150 270 390 510 630 750 950 30s 150 270 390 510 630 750 950 evolution of the area that feeds the cloud at initiation, maximum of moisture transport but small area covered by updrafts afterwards this area increases but less and less vertical transport Role of humidity CAPE (colors) and rv (isolines) at surface Evidence of a strong impact of water vapour variability on stability indexes for CAPE and CIN (m) CIN (colors) and rv (isolines) at surface (m) ARM – 16 UTC (m) (m) Role of water vapour ARM evolution of the total fraction covered by perturbations relationship between clouds and the “intensity” but not the size of the moisture perturbation evolution of the mean size of perturbation Transitory aspect of the water vapour in the dry boundary layer – IHOP simulation Couvreux (2005) at 0.5zi At the end of the day large scale of variability is still present but smaller intensity Water vapour variability in dry BL at 12 local time Lidar observations LES simulation 5. 5.0 5.5 0 6.0 5. 6.5 5 7.0 6. 7.5 0 8.0 6. 8.5 5 9.0 7. 9.5 0 10. 7. 5 8. 0 5. 5.0 5.5 0 6.0 5. 6.5 5 7.0 6. 7.5 0 8.0 6. 8.5 5 9.0 7. 9.5 0 10. 7. 5 8. Explained variance (%) P3 aircraft KA aircraft qv’ v’² w’² Couvreux et al. 2005 rv’² dry tongues largely responsible for the water vapour in the dry boundary layer Can the dry tongues play a role in organisation ? ARM – 16 UTC need to investigate possible role of dry tongues in the organization of clouds clouds qt(BL) & cloud CIN & cloud BOMEX Cloud organisation variations of size, distance to neighbour, height: links with subcloud variables ? ARM HUM3h BOMEX HUM3b E1120 E1133 more smaller clouds enough resolution cldbase~blh relationship with dry tongues need to be more investigated ... Preliminary conclusions Summary : - at cloud base: narrow distribution at initiation wider distribution during the cloud life cycle width of cloud base at initiation discriminates small/large clouds - in subcloud layer : w' max, qt' max , e' max, dwqt/dz max at initiation - enhancement of moisture flux under cloud - importance of the qt distribution (more “intensity” than size of perturbation) Future work: - pursue the study of the link between the qt distribution in BL and clouds - look more in details at the exchange at cloud base through the cloud life cycle - application to parameterization Thanks for your attention Dry thermals/wet thermals Thermodynamical properties of the dry thermals versus cloudy thermal (conditional sampling on w' and cld col) A(wet thermals)~0.2 A(dry thermals)~0.2 Wet thermals moister and faster in the upper half of the boundary layer Role of humidity CAPE (colors) and rv (isolines) in BL Evidence of a strong impact of water vapour variability on stability indexes for CAPE and CIN (m) CIN (colors) and rv (isolines) in BL (m) ARM – 20 UTC (m) 15 10 5 CIN 0 r²=0.45 -1.5 -1. -0.5 0 rv (g/kg) 0.5 1. (m) Subcloud layer characteristics Evolution with time: criteria of initiation only during the first 3-4 minutes w w (m/s) (m/s) <q>BL (kg/kg) e (K) (K) d<w'q'>/dz (kg/kg/s) <q>BL (kg/kg) w w (m/s) (m/s) <q>BL (kg/kg) e cloud C d<w'q'>/dz (kg/kg/s) e e (K) (K) d<w'q'>/dz (kg/kg/s) <q>BL (kg/kg) cloud C w w e (m/s) e (m/s) (K) (K) d<w'q'>/dz (kg/kg/s) Cloud C d<w'q'>/dz (kg/kg/s) d<w'q'>/dz (kg/kg/s) Cloud base characteristics after initiation Variation of the distribution through the life cycle of the clouds: ex: cloud A qt'~max v'~0 l'~min (%) (%) (%) (g/kg) (K) w~1m/s (%) (m/s) same results for other clouds (K) t=0s t=180s t=360s t=450s t=540s t=720s t=870s
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz