AF
APPENDIX 3-I-A
T
EAST-WEST TIE TRANSMISSION PROJECT
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT
D
R
Alternative Route Assessment around Loon Lake for the East-West
Tie Transmission Project
December 19, 2016
Project No. 1536607/2000/2017
T
AF
R
D
December 19, 2016
NEXTBRIDGE INFRASTRUCTURE LP
D
R
AF
T
Alternative Route
Assessment around
Loon Lake for the
East‑West Tie
Transmission Project
Report Number: 1536607/2000/2017
Distribution:
NextBridge Infrastructure LP - 1 e-copy
Golder Associated Ltd. - 1 e-copy
T
AF
R
D
ALTERNATIVE ROUTE ASSESSMENT AROUND LOON LAKE
EAST-WEST TIE TRANSMISSION PROJECT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1
2.
BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................. 1
Previous E valuation of Alternatives ............................................................................................ 1
2.2
Identification of Additional Alternative Route Segments ............................................................... 2
APPROACH FOR THE EV ALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE ROUTE SEGMENTS .................................... 3
3.1
Overall Met hod ......................................................................................................................... 3
3.2
Alternatives Assessment Criteria and Indicators.......................................................................... 3
T
3.
2.1
COMP ARATIV E EV ALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE ROUTE SEGMENTS .............................................. 3
5.
CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................... 5
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4-1:
AF
4.
Loon Lake Alternative Route Segments Advantages and Disadvantages................................. 4
LIST OF APPENDICES
R
APPENDIX A
Loon Lake Alternative Route Segments Figure
D
APPENDIX B
Alternatives Assessment Criteria and Indicators Table
Decem ber 19, 2016
Report No. 1536607/2000/2017
i
AF
T
ALTERNATIVE ROUTE ASSESSMENT AROUND LOON LAKE
EAST-WEST TIE TRANSMISSION PROJECT
D
R
This page left intentionally blank
Decem ber 19, 2016
Report No. 1536607/2000/2017
ii
ALTERNATIVE ROUTE ASSESSMENT AROUND LOON LAKE
EAST-WEST TIE TRANSMISSION PROJECT
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Environmental Assessment
GIS
geographic information systems
IESO
Independent Electricity System Operator
km
kilometre
kV
kilovolt
MNRF
Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
MOECC
Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change
NextBridge
NextBridge Infrastructure LP
OEB
Ontario Energy Board
OPA
Ontario Power Authority
ROW
right-of-way
SWH
significant wildlife habitat
the Project
East-West Tie Transmission Project
ToR
Terms of Reference
TS
Transformer Station
D
R
AF
T
EA
Decem ber 19, 2016
Report No. 1536607/2000/2017
iii
AF
T
ALTERNATIVE ROUTE ASSESSMENT AROUND LOON LAKE
EAST-WEST TIE TRANSMISSION PROJECT
D
R
This page left intentionally blank
Decem ber 19, 2016
Report No. 1536607/2000/2017
iv
ALTERNATIVE ROUTE ASSESSMENT AROUND LOON LAKE
EAST-WEST TIE TRANSMISSION PROJECT
1. INTRODUCTION
NextBridge Infrastructure LP (NextBridge) is proposing to construct, own and maintain the East-West Tie
Transmission Project (the Project or undertaking). The Project is a new, approximately 446 kilometre (km) long
double-circuit 230-kilovolt (kV) transmission line that connects the Lakehead Transformer Station (TS) in the
Municipality of Shuniah, near the City of Thunder Bay, to the Wawa TS located east of the Municipality of Wawa
(with a connection at the Marathon TS, in the Town of Marathon).
T
The Project has been identified as a priority project by the Province of Ontario, and a needed Project by the
Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO, formerly the Ontario Power Authority [OPA; On January 1, 2015,
the OPA merged with the IESO to create a new organization that combines the OPA and IESO mandates.]) to
meet future electricity demand in northwestern Ontario.
AF
The Project is subject to Ontario’s Individual Environmental Assessment (EA) process based on the voltage and
length. A Terms of Reference (ToR) for the Individual EA was submitted to the Ministry of the Environment
and Climate Change (MOECC) in February 2014 and approved in August 2014. Subsequently, an EA Report has
been prepared in accordance with the approved ToR.
The preliminary preferred route for the Project was identified by comparing the routes that were originally proposed
by NextBridge during the Ontario Energy Board’s (OEB) competitive bid process (i.e., the Reference Route that
generally parallels the existing East-West Tie line and three alternative route segments around certain federal
lands) with a series of 37 additional alternative route segments, as requested by the Ministry of Natural Resources
and Forestry (MNRF) and other stakeholders. The alternative route assessment used the criteria and indicators
provided in the approved ToR to identify the route that is preferred from environmental, socio-economic and
technical perspectives (i.e., more advantages than disadvantages).
D
R
Consultation on the preliminary preferred route with local residents, landowners, and fishing club representatives
near Loon Lake, including feedback received at the second and third round of Open Houses, resulted in
identification of alternative route segments around Loon Lake. This report focusses on the assessment of these
Loon Lake alternative route segments. The objective of this assessment is to confirm the option in the vicinity of
Loon Lake with the best balance of environmental, socio-economic and technical advantages compared to other
alternatives, which will be the preferred route.
2. BACKGROUND
2.1 Previous Evaluation of Alternatives
The Reference Route (as defined in the EA Report), and three alternative routes to avoid certain federal lands
(two First Nation reserves and Pukaskwa National Park) were identified by NextBridge as part of a screening
process completed during the bid process organized by the OEB. The Reference Route, which generally parallels
the existing East-West Tie line, is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 which recommends
making the best use of existing infrastructure and corridors, and that infrastructure be provided in a coordinated,
efficient and cost effective manner before proposing new greenfield (i.e., parcel of land that has not been
previously developed [Heid 2004]) developments that do not parallel existing developments. This was one of the
OPA’s considerations in selecting the Reference Route (also referred to as the Reference Option by the OPA) and
is consistent with the direction to other electricity transmitters in the past from provincial agencies and ministries
Decem ber 19, 2016
Report No. 1536607/2000/2017
1
ALTERNATIVE ROUTE ASSESSMENT AROUND LOON LAKE
EAST-WEST TIE TRANSMISSION PROJECT
to make use of existing rights-of-way (ROWs) and corridors before seeking approvals for greenfield routes (i.e., not
adjacent to existing infrastructure). The Reference Route was identified based on the following:




the IESO and Ontario Energy Board identified and acknowledged the Reference Route;

the use of the Reference Route is consistent with provincial policy as it is generally adjacent to the existing
East-West Tie line ROW.
the bidding process to select a designated transmitter focused on the Reference Route;
NextBridge examined the Reference Route during the bidding process;
the Reference Route is the shortest distance to connect the Thunder Bay TS and Wawa TS with a connection
at Marathon TS (following existing transmission facilities); and,
AF
T
It was determined that additional alternative route segments should be identified and assessed as potential
alternatives to the Reference Route to confirm the best route from an environmental, socio-economic and technical
perspective based on comments received during the ToR phase. The Township of Dorion also requested that
NextBridge review additional alternative route segments to avoid affecting private property in the Dorion area and
potential effects to the Ouimet Canyon area. In December 2015, NextBridge produced the Alternative Route
Report (NextBridge 2015) that included an evaluation of alternative route segments, as requested by the MNRF
and other stakeholders. The Reference Route was assessed in each area in comparison to alternative route
segments representing other route options to identify the preliminary preferred route.
R
NextBridge determined, based on the assessment, that with two exceptions the preliminary preferred route is
generally adjacent to the existing East-West Tie line, and it has more advantages and fewer disadvantages than
the alternative route segments. The first exception relates to Pukaskwa National Park. Given that Parks Canada
has determined that it is not prepared to authorize access to study a new transmission line through Pukaskwa
National Park, the alternative around the park that is adjacent to a 115-kV transmission line and logging roads and
crosses a cutover area is considered the best feasible alternative and therefore, forms part of the preliminary
preferred route. Also, based on feedback received through public consultation with the residents of the Township
of Dorion and the results of the desktop GIS-based analysis, routing to the west of Ouimet Canyon Provincial Park
is generally preferred in this area and has been identified as part of the preliminary preferred route.
D
Additional alternative route segments around provincial parks and conservation reserves were identified and
assessed in response to feedback on the assessment from the MNRF. This additional assessment is included in
Appendix 3-I-B and confirmed that the preliminary preferred route has more advantages and fewer disadvantages
than the additional alternative route segments.
2.2 Identification of Further Alternative Route Segments
NextBridge was presented with two alternative route segments by Loon Lake community members,
the Damphino Fishing Club, and the North Shore Fishing Club at a meeting held July 26, 2016 at the West Loon
Lake Community Centre. A third alternative route segment was forwarded to NextBridge on July 27, 2016.
Through discussion at the meeting, and follow-up discussions, one of the alternative route segments was identified
as the preferred alternative by Loon Lake stakeholders. NextBridge proposed some minor refinements to improve
constructability of this particular alternative and it was then assessed as an additional alternative route segment.
This additional alternative route segment is the focus of this report. This alternative route segment, along with the
preliminary preferred route segment around Loon Lake, are shown in Appendix A.
Decem ber 19, 2016
Report No. 1536607/2000/2017
2
ALTERNATIVE ROUTE ASSESSMENT AROUND LOON LAKE
EAST-WEST TIE TRANSMISSION PROJECT
3. APPROACH FOR THE EVALUATION OF
ALTERNATIVE ROUTE SEGMENTS
The following sections summarize the method used for the identification, evaluation and selection of the preferred
alternative route segment around Loon Lake.
3.1 Overall Method
AF
T
A similar method to that applied by NextBridge (2015) was used for this analysis. The general routing criteria
(Table 1 from NextBridge 2015; Appendix 3-I-C), the preference for existing linear ROWs with consideration of the
limitations associated with paralleling certain types of existing infrastructure was considered (e.g., minimum
separation distances), and the two-step process for comparison using assessment criteria and indicators as well
as screening criteria (MOECC 2014) were applied in identifying and assessing additional route segments.
Each alternative had to meet the screening criteria listed in the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change
(MOECC) Code of Practice: Preparing and Reviewing Terms of Reference for Environmental Assessments in
Ontario (2014) criteria to be carried forward.
Data for the comparative evaluation presented in Section 4 were derived from available Geographic Information
Systems (GIS) databases and supplemented by air photo interpretation where possible. For some linear feature
types (e.g., rail lines, roads, trails and watercourses) that are crossed multiple times, the feature is only reported
(in Appendix A) as a single crossing per alternative. The GIS-based information used for this assessment may not
be as detailed as that presented in the EA Report.
3.2 Alternatives Assessment Criteria and Indicators
Route Report
R
The alternatives assessment criteria and indicators that were used in the Alternative
(NextBridge 2015) were used to assess the new alternative route segment.
D
4. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF
ALTERNATIVE ROUTE SEGMENTS
This section presents the comparative evaluation of the alternative route segments around Loon Lake. Criteria
and indicator tables used to support the analysis are presented in Appendix B. All the criteria and indicators were
evaluated with the focus of the discussion on advantages and disadvantages and notable differences between
route segments. The advantages and disadvantages of each route segment are presented in Table 4-1.
The advantages of the alternative route segment around Loon Lake are that it is the shortest route segment, has
the smallest area of overlap with potential aggregate resources, has the smallest area of overlap with mapped
water bodies (not including watercourses), has the largest area of overlap with previous logging disturbance,
crosses the least number of roads and is preferred by Loon Lake community members.
For these reasons, the alternative route segment around Loon Lake is considered the best alternative.
Decem ber 19, 2016
Report No. 1536607/2000/2017
3
ALTERNATIVE ROUTE ASSESSMENT AROUND LOON LAKE
EAST-WEST TIE TRANSMISSION PROJECT
Table 4-1:
Loon Lake Alternative Route Segments Advantages and Disadvantages
Advantages
Disadvantages




Largest area of the ROW that overlaps with mining
claims
Largest area of the ROW that overlaps with mapped
unevaluated wetlands
Greatest number of mapped watercourses crossed
by the ROW
Largest area of the ROW that overlaps with
potentially SWH

Smallest area of the ROW that overlaps with a
mining operation or claim
Smallest area of the ROW that overlaps with
mapped unevaluated wetlands
Least number of mapped watercourses crossed by
the ROW
Smallest area of the ROW that overlaps with
potentially SWH




Longest route
Largest area of the ROW that overlaps with potential
aggregate resources
Largest area of mapped water bodies (not including
watercourses) in the ROW
Greatest number of mapped water bodies crossed
by the ROW
Smallest area of the ROW with previous logging
disturbance
Greatest number of roads crossed by the ROW
Greatest number of transmission line corners
Greatest number of transmission line crossovers
Not favoured by Loon Lake stakeholders



D
R


Meets the screening criteria
AF
T
Alternative Route Segment Around Loon Lake
 Shortest route
 Smallest area of the ROW that overlaps with
potential aggregate resources
 Smallest area of mapped water bodies (not including
watercourses) in the ROW
 Least number of mapped water bodies crossed by
the ROW
 Largest area of the ROW with previous logging
disturbance
 Least number of roads crossed by the ROW
 Least number of transmission line corners
 Least number of transmission line crossovers
 Preferred by Loon Lake stakeholders
Preliminary Preferred Route Segment
Screening Criteria





Decem ber 19, 2016
Report No. 1536607/2000/2017
4
Previously confirmed to meet the
screening criteria (NextBridge 2015;
Appendix 3-I-C)
ALTERNATIVE ROUTE ASSESSMENT AROUND LOON LAKE
EAST-WEST TIE TRANSMISSION PROJECT
5. CONCLUSION
The assessment of alternative route segments around Loon Lake resulted in the identification of a preferred
alternative route segment in this area. The preferred alternative route segment around Loon Lake is the alternative
route segment identified by Loon Lake stakeholders as the preferred alternative, with minor refinements to improve
constructability. This alternative route segment is the shortest route segment, has the smallest area of overlap
with potential aggregate resources, has the smallest area of overlap with mapped water bodies (not including
watercourses), has the largest area of overlap with previous logging disturbance, crosses the least number of
roads, requires the least number of transmission line corners, requires the least number of transmission line
crossovers, and has the most advantages when compared to the preliminary preferred route.
D
R
AF
T
Incorporation of this alternative route segment into the preferred route represents a local route refinement from
the preliminary preferred route. The preferred route, including this local route refinement, is assessed in the
EA Report.
Decem ber 19, 2016
Report No. 1536607/2000/2017
5
ALTERNATIVE ROUTE ASSESSMENT AROUND LOON LAKE
EAST-WEST TIE TRANSMISSION PROJECT
REFERENCES
Heid, J. 2004. Greenfield Development Without Sprawl: The Role of Planned Communities.
Available from: http://ww.uli.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/ 07/GreenfieldDev.ashx_.pdf.
Last accessed in 2015.
MOECC (Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change). 2014. Code of Practice: Preparing and Reviewing
Terms of Reference for Environmental Assessments in Ontario. Revision 2. Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
97 pp.
D
R
AF
T
NextBridge (NextBridge Infrastructure LP). 2015. NextBridge Infrastructure L.P. Draft Alternative Route
Assessment for the East-West Tie Transmission Project. December 2015.
Decem ber 19, 2016
Report No. 1536607/2000/2017
6
AF
APPENDIX A
T
ALTERNATIVE ROUTE ASSESSMENT AROUND LOON LAKE
EAST-WEST TIE TRANSMISSION PROJECT
D
R
Loon Lake Alternative Route Segments Figure
Decem ber 19, 2016
Report No. 1536607/2000/2017
T
AF
R
D
345000
350000
355000
360000
365000
370000
375000
380000
385000
390000
5410000
340000
5410000
335000
CAVERN LAKE
PROVINCIAL
NATURE RESERVE
5405000
Project Component
Preferred Route Transmission Line
340000
Route Alternative
Alternative Route Segment Around Loon Lake
Preliminary Preferred Route
345000
Base Data
350000
355000
!
JAMES
BAY
O N TA R I O
Transmission Line
Conservation Authority
Provincial Park
National Marine Conservation Area
THUNDER BAY
LAKE SUPERIOR
U. S. A.
370000
³
5400000
A
H
W
5395000
AY
LAKE SUPERIOR
NATIONAL MARINE
CONSERVATION AREA
5390000
AD
0
DRAFT
2,000
4,000
380000
6,000
METRES
1:150,000
385000
390000
REFERENCE(S)
BASE DATA: MNRF LIO (2016), CANVEC (2016), DILLON (2014, 2015)
PROJECT COMPONENTS: PROVIDED BY NEXTBRIDGE (OCTOBER 19, 2016)
PRODUCED BY GOLDER ASSOCATES LTD. UNDER LICENSE FROM ONTARIO MINISTRY OF
NATURAL RESOURCES, © QUEENS PRINTER 2016
PROJECTION: TRANSVERSE MERCATOR DATUM: NAD 83 COORDINATE SYSTEM: UTM ZONE 16N
PROJECT
EAST-WEST TIE TRANSMISSION PROJECT
WAWA
(
!
GEORGIAN
BAY
LAKE
MICHIGAN
375000
CLIENT
MARATHON
(
!
(
!
Water Body
AN
AN
IG
5385000
365000
KEY MAP
Highway
Local Road
TR
SC
H
SLEEPING GIANT
PROVINCIAL PARK
360000
Railway
LAKEHEAD REGION
CONSERVATION
AUTHORITY
25mm
LEGEND
335000
D
R
5390000
5385000
PATH: S:\Clients\NextBridge\East_West_Tie\99_PROJ\1536607_EA\40_PROD\0031_Loon_Lake_Alternative_Routes_Assessment\1536607-0031-G-0001.mxd PRINTED ON: 2016-11-22 AT: 2:02:40 PM
5395000
«
¬
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ANSI B
527
LAKE
HURON
YYYY-MM-DD
2016-11-22
DESIGNED
GOLDER JR
PREPARED
GOLDER SK/JB
REVIEWED
(
!
APPROVED
TITLE
LOON LAKE ALTERNATIVES
PROJECT NO.
1536607
CONTROL
REV.
A
FIGURE
1
0
5400000
AF
T
5405000
OUIMET CANYON
PROVINCIAL PARK
AF
T
D
R
This page intentionally left blank
AF
APPENDIX B
T
ALTERNATIVE ROUTE ASSESSMENT AROUND LOON LAKE
EAST-WEST TIE TRANSMISSION PROJECT
D
R
Alternatives Assessment Criteria and Indicators Table
Decem ber 19, 2016
Report No. 1536607/2000/2017
T
AF
R
D
APPENDIX B
Comparative Evaluation of Alternative Route Segments around Loon Lake
Factor
Physical
Size
Indicator
32.2
32.9
Total Length of the ROW not in water bodies (km)
31.8
32.3
Area of the ROW (ha)
193.7
197.7
Area of agricultural fields in the ROW (ha)
None identified
None identified
Private property
Number of potential dwellings in the ROW
0
0
Number of settlement areas crossed by the ROW
0
0
Number of Forest Management Units crossed by the ROW
2
2
Area of Conservation Areas in the ROW (ha)
0
0
Area of Conservation Reserves in the ROW (ha)
0
0
Area of Provincial Parks in the ROW (ha)
0
0
Area of National Parks in the ROW (ha)
0
0
Area of mines in the ROW (ha)
0
0
49.3
0.4
Number of mining claims crossed by the ROW
10
1
Area of aggregate pits in the ROW (ha)
0
0
71.9
158.8
Area of mining claims in the ROW (ha)
Area of high potential for aggregate resources in the ROW (ha)
Community Services
None identified
None identified
Number of hospitals and healthcare facilities crossed by the ROW
None identified
None identified
Number of schools and educational institutions crossed by the ROW
None identified
None identified
Number of community centres crossed by the ROW
None identified
None identified
Number of waste management facilities crossed by ROW
0
0
Number of trails crossed by the ROW
0
0
Number of outpost camps crossed by the ROW
D
R
Aesthetics
Area of land designated for commercial and industrial purposes (non-mining) in the ROW (ha)
Number of campgrounds crossed by the ROW (ha)
Tourism and Recreation
Non-Aboriginal Archaeology, Cultural Heritage, Traditional Land and
Resource Use
0
None identified
Number of golf courses crossed by the ROW
None identified
None identified
None identified
None identified
17.4
Potential for the entire area of ROW
(ha)
Number of archaeological sites crossed by the ROW
Number of known cemeteries crossed by the ROW
Area of traditional land uses/harvest areas identified in the ROW (ha)
Length of ROW with archaeological potential (km)
Aboriginal Archaeology, Cultural Heritage, Traditional Land and Resource
Use
0
None identified
Number of known public scenic viewpoints crossed by the ROW
Length of ROW with archaeological potential (km)
Page B-1
Preliminary Preferred Route
Soil
Land Use
SocioEconomic
Alternative Route Segment
Around Loon Lake
Total Length (km) of the ROW
AF
T
General
Criteria
Number of archaeological sites crossed by the ROW
Area of First Nation reserves in the ROW (ha)
0
0
None identified
None identified
No site-specific information available
No site-specific information available
17.4
Potential for the entire area of ROW
(ha)
0
0
0
0
Area of traditional land uses/harvest areas identified in the ROW (ha)
No site-specific information available
No site-specific information available
Area of traditional burial grounds in the ROW (ha)
No site-specific information available
No site-specific information available
December 19, 2016
Project No. 1536607/2000/2017
APPENDIX B
Comparative Evaluation of Alternative Route Segments around Loon Lake
Factor
Criteria
Indicator
Métis mobility in the ROW
SocioEconomic
(cont’d)
Harvesting
Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest
Wetlands
No data available
No data available
No site-specific information available
No site-specific information available
Spiritual connection to areas in the ROW
No site-specific information available
No site-specific information available
Type of harvesting activities exercised in the ROW
No site-specific information available
No site-specific information available
Key cultural species harvested in the ROW
No site-specific information available
No site-specific information available
Conditions required for continued harvest in the ROW
No site-specific information available
No site-specific information available
Area of mapped Provincially Significant Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (Earth Science and Life
Science) in the ROW (ha)
0
0
Area of mapped Candidate Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (Earth Science and Life Science) in
the ROW (ha)
0
0
Area of mapped Provincially Significant Wetlands in the ROW (ha)
0
0
Area of mapped previously evaluated non-provincially significant wetlands in the ROW (ha)
Area of mapped unevaluated wetlands in the ROW (ha)
Natural
Water Bodies and Watercourses
Species at Risk
Community Infrastructure
24
22
2.7
2.9
Area of previously logged lands in the ROW (ha)
Area of seed collection lands in the ROW (ha)
Area of mapped potential significant wildlife habitat in the ROW (ha)
Number of mapped nesting sites crossed by the ROW
Area of mapped Woodland Caribou continuous habitat in the ROW (ha)
None identified
None identified
93.7
24.6
None identified
None identified
0
0
0
0
21
23
Number of rail lines crossed by the ROW
1
1
Number of pipelines crossed by the ROW
Number of transmission line corners required
Number of transmission line crossovers required
Distance of existing access roads available (low, medium, high)
Distance of new access roads required (low, medium, high)
Page B-2
11
17.0
Number of roads crossed by the ROW
Area of hazard (unstable) land crossed by the proposed ROW (ha)
Constructability
9
66.9
Area of mapped Woodland Caribou discontinuous habitat in the ROW (ha)
Number of local airports crossed by the ROW
Technical
0
9.6
Area of mapped water bodies (not including watercourses) in the ROW (ha)
D
R
Wildlife Habitat
0
12.6
Number of mapped watercourses crossed by the ROW
Number of mapped water bodies crossed by the ROW
Forest Resources
Preliminary Preferred Route
Types of teaching/ transmission programs, services and practices in the ROW
AF
T
Way of Life
Alternative Route Segment
Around Loon Lake
0
0
None identified
None identified
Information not available
Information not available
3
8
0
1
Low
Low
Low
Low
Terrain (poor, moderate, favourable)
Moderate
Moderate
Sufficient work space (poor, moderate, good)
Moderate
Moderate
December 19, 2016
Project No. 1536607/2000/2017
T
AF
R
D
R
AF
T
.
NextBridge Infrastructure
D
390 Bay Street, Suite 1720
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 2Y2
www.NextBridge.ca