Rubric for Incorporation Presentation US v Lopez Gitlow v New York

AP AMERICAN GOVERNMENT
Mr. Crawford
Rubric for Incorporation Presentation
Beginning
1
Creativity
Content
Developing
Exemplary
2
3
Genre is unclear.
Genre is clear and effective.
Genre is absent.
Confusing, does not
Creativity improves
Fails to present the case and
effectively present case or understanding of both case
rule.
rule.
and rule.
Information is off-topic and Information is inaccurate or
inaccurate.
incomplete.
Precedent rule is absent.
Precedent rule is unclear.
Construction
Visuals are dull,
transitions are confusing,
sound is distracting
CASE
CREATIVITY
Visuals are confusing,
transitions are uneven,
sound is inconsistent
CONTENT
US v Lopez
Gitlow v New York
NY Times v Sullivan
Miller v California
Texas v Johnson
Cantwell v
Connecticut
Lemon v. Kurtzman
1
Information is presented
clearly and creatively.
Precedent Rule is clear.
Visuals hold attention,
transitions are smooth,
sound is always clear.
CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL
AP AMERICAN GOVERNMENT
Mr. Crawford
Rubric for Incorporation Presentation
Developing
Exemplary
2
3
Genre is unclear.
Genre is clear and effective.
Genre is absent.
Confusing, does not
Creativity improves
Fails to present the case and
effectively present case or understanding of both case
rule.
rule.
and rule.
Beginning
1
Creativity
Content
Information is off-topic and Information is inaccurate or
inaccurate.
incomplete.
Precedent rule is absent.
Precedent rule is unclear.
Construction
Visuals are dull,
transitions are confusing,
sound is distracting
CASE
CREATIVITY
Visuals are confusing,
transitions are uneven,
sound is inconsistent
CONTENT
Tinker v Des
Moines
Hazelwood v
Kuhlmeier
McDonald v
Chicago
Loving v Virginia
Griswald v
Connecticut
Roe v Wade
Planned
Parenthood v
Casey
Cruzan v Missouri
Health
2
Information is presented
clearly and creatively.
Precedent Rule is clear.
Visuals hold attention,
transitions are smooth,
sound is always clear.
CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL
AP AMERICAN GOVERNMENT
Mr. Crawford
Rubric for Incorporation Presentation
Beginning
1
Creativity
Content
Developing
Exemplary
2
3
Genre is clear and effective.
Genre is unclear.
Genre is absent.
Confusing, does not
Creativity improves
Fails to present the case and
effectively present case or understanding of both case
rule.
rule.
and rule.
Information is off-topic and Information is inaccurate or
inaccurate.
incomplete.
Precedent rule is absent.
Precedent rule is unclear.
Construction
Visuals are dull,
transitions are confusing,
sound is distracting
CASE
CREATIVITY
Visuals are confusing,
transitions are uneven,
sound is inconsistent
CONTENT
Mapp v Ohio
.
US v Leon
Maryland v King
Benton v Maryland
Miranda v Arizona
Gideon v
Wainwright
Gregg v Georgia
Roper v Simmons
3
Information is presented
clearly and creatively.
Precedent Rule is clear.
Visuals hold attention,
transitions are smooth,
sound is always clear.
CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL
AP AMERICAN GOVERNMENT
Mr. Crawford
Rubric for Incorporation Presentation
Beginning
1
Creativity
Content
Developing
Exemplary
2
3
Genre is clear and effective.
Genre is unclear.
Genre is absent.
Confusing, does not
Creativity improves
Fails to present the case and
effectively present case or understanding of both case
rule.
rule.
and rule.
Information is off-topic and Information is inaccurate or
inaccurate.
incomplete.
Precedent rule is absent.
Precedent rule is unclear.
Construction
Visuals are dull,
transitions are confusing,
sound is distracting
CASE
CREATIVITY
Visuals are confusing,
transitions are uneven,
sound is inconsistent
CONTENT
Plessy v Ferguson
Brown v Board of
Education
Shelby County v
Holder
Regents v Bakke
.
Grutter v Bollinger
Lawrence v Texas
Windsor v US
4
Information is presented
clearly and creatively.
Precedent Rule is clear.
Visuals hold attention,
transitions are smooth,
sound is always clear.
CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL