tt
J
I 1-g
t;
ON THE REUNIFICAT]ON
by
Johan
Department
Princeton
Princeton,
January
I
OF KORE;f,
Galtung
of Politics
University
New Jersey
1986
08540
fn the
p r o ce ss
years
last
of
K orea.
not mu c h h a s h a p p e n e d f o r
A nd nev e rt h e le s s
a pr e d iction:
by the year
ca ti on
nationr
it
is
of
then
ge the r
assumed that
as they
found
on ly
in
th e wor:rd having
system s,
gre a t e r
the
fou r
The forces
in
b a d ly
have gotten
in
f o rc e s
finding
s h o u rd
use d t o
And those
not
the
for
r: e u n i f i -
the
two
a.re
a c jd it ion
t h e o n ly
country
t h e wo rld
today
the
so
to-
f o rc e s
in
d if f e re n c e s
t wo K o re as
in
the
t wo
b e u n d e re s t ima t e d ;
s it u a t io n
reas o n s wh y n o t h in g
needed imaginatio n
p u llin g
in s id e
by
rn s a y in g
in t e re s t s
found
of
K o re a n n a t io n
p o we rs in
le a d e r: s h ip s ,
th a t
the
K o re a is
b ig g e s t
a re a ls o
the
and one factor
in n o va ti ve
the
Japan a n d c h in a ;
interests
m a n y pe ople
than
s t a nd
b e s o me k in d
p u s h in g
s u p e r-p o we r
in
a s vested
f o rc e s
to
b y h is t o ry .
the obvio u s
of
as ne ig h bors.
will
t o d a y , a p a rt .
the
th e
th e
re u n if j-c a t i o n
a re re a s o n s
are define d
to
interests
2 0 0 0 t h e re
so b a . d 1 y t re a t e d
are by-and-large
co u n tr i es,
no t
that
t h e re
the
a n d h a v e b e c o me
wirl
a p ro c e s s
of
h a p p e n wh e re a s
u n if ic a t io n
is
scar ce .
And never:theless
si gn ifi cant
thir ty
to
factor:
the p re d ic t io n
the
y ears , L945-7975,
l oo k
t o p ro d u c e
with
at
co r :r esp o ndingly,
took
s p a in
War , L 9 36-L939
de m o cr a tic
o wn l i ves
to
(and the
path,
and in
th e point
of
unifying
that
killinq
of
le a s t
dea t h
to
about
of
wit h
f re s h
s o me e x t e n t
y e a rs
f o rt y
F ra n c o )
p e o p le wh o a t
Sp a in ,
rt
to
So maybe
it
wa s a b l e
f a u n c hi n q
a n e w id e n t it y .
after
the
dg€,
wo u ld h a v e b e e n b i-t t e rlv
eac h o t h e r "
G e rm a n y
that
eyes,
la u n c h
a n e a rlie r
one
took
a n e w g e n e ra t io n
a n d c rime s
Ge r m a n y as a nation
because of
g e n e ra t io n s .
change of
aL the Nazi horrors
it
stands
takes
the
c iv i l
c o r: n t ry
in
on a
t h ei r
o n n o so r t forty
yeal:s
2
a lso
fo r
the
te r r ib le
th e
1950-1953,
war: of
l ea der
le a vin g
in
the
north?
fr o m Ge rmany, but
in c lu d in g
And that
year
by the
process
In this
I do n o t
very
mu c h t o
the d if f e re n c e s
in
ve n g e e ven, for
to
stifl e
in
on e c entury"
the horrors
peoples
by m a r xists
of
w it h
that
not
not
imp o rt a n t ,
So, whereas a consens u s s e e ms t o b e b u ild in g
of
an d i de as
freely
of
crossing
the Ger:man nation.
the n a t io n ,
ft
t h e b o rd e rs
s h o u ld
Th u r :i ng en as from B arzaria in t o
sen ti m en ts
do not
surround
the
times
t h re e
the
the
is
-a s
both
t h in k
c ro s s
s a y in g
in
they
in s id e
p e o p le ,
c o n s id e re d
K o re a n p e n in s u la ;
in N o r t h
as a state
sense of
the
headed
wh o a r e
wh o d o t h e y
be as easy to
T ir: o l
me a s u r e
ra c is m:
n o t b e u n if ie d
in
ds a re-
wa s a s u p e r- p o w e r
o c c id e n t a l
a re t h e y ,
will
again,
wh o b e c a me p re s ld e n t
of
the
J a p a n e s e i. mp e ra lis m
ar :e?
thatthecountry
a ll,
account
T h e d iv is io n
p e o p le
le a r n
wa s a n e n e m y b u t
in t o
Koreans,
as the unification
to
G e rma n y w a s
in c lin a t io n s ,
t a k in g
b y le a d e rs
of
after
b e c a u s e it
a g a in s t
e x p re s s io n
what kind
mu c h t o
b e c a me a u n it y
th e se
o u tsi de G ermany
I990s,
p ro c e s s
a n d a s a p re v e n t iv e
p ro v e n
it s
Ko r e a a nd S outh K orea respe c t iv e ly .
and a clear
is
f ro m A u s t rj-a ;
t h e wa r;
f iq h t
and christians,
con ve n ie nce,
of
the
a q a j-n f a s p u n is h me n t r
Japanese e mp ire ,
own heroic
t h e re
a re
K orea was d iv id e d
the
the
a wa y a ls o
a re a s o n a b le
wh e re a s A u s t ria
be u n it e d
to
a German state
as a pa .rt of
Ko r e a n
not
order
for
le a rn
in
Of course
p a s s in g
wo u ld b rj-n q u s in t o
t h . in k
unifie d
d ivid e d
the
after
2000.
tw o G er manys are not
19 5 5 ,
a n e w g e n e ra t io n
numbe r: o f y e a rs
a sufficient
b e com p leted
p ro d u c e
two K oreas to
and
where-
goods
a b irt h
ri g h t
f ro m B a v a r i a
goes "
that
S uc h
s e n se t h e
into
J
si tu a ti on
it
is
wa s the
So vie t
more similar
United
of
(tlnt
r ea listi c
the goal
is
C on fed e r al-
Republic
to
of
the
fir st
th e
twenty
very
small
put
the
d isco u r se,
or
in
steps
sma ll,
goal "
broader
t e rms
(rhe reader will
qqq-ol:iented!
Ag ain A ustria
might
talk
socia li- st,
is
across
o b r r io u s that
is
ob tai- n this
fo r wa r d ,
fed e r a ti on
it
level
that
of
is
the
of
in t e re s t -
is
It
the
(D C R K ) .
K o re a
c o rre s p o n d i n g
in
b y S o u t h K o re a :
t h e p r: o c e s s i
of
c o n c re t e
t y p ic a l
steps
of
wit h o u t
much
s o c ia lis t -c a p it a lis t
c h a n g e -o rie n t e d
a s a n e x a mp le "
ma n y Hu n g a ria n s
Hu n g a ria n .
v s st a t u s
e x c e lle n t
T h e in t e rc o u rs e
f ro n t ie r
is
it
t a lk
T h e re w a s
T o d a y o n e c o u n t ry
c a p it a lis t .
pro b le ma t ic
c o n s id e ra b le "
If
"
the
s t ric t ly
In a sense,
yes,
is
people,
of
It
is
t wo n e ig h b o rs
wo u ld a lre a d y
not me a n t h a t
unnecessary?
Mu c h mo re
find the correspondinq docunents in the appendix.)
interac t io n
B ut does that
wit h
t y p ic a l
E mp ire ,
G er m a n , some A ustrians
go o d s and ideas
the goal
be in t e re s t in g
o n ce a n A ustro-Hunga.rian
one country
u n it y "
R e la t iv e ly
the
A iv e n
t h e De mo c ra t i c
n o rt h :
wit h in
h ig h ly
"
A u n it a ry
s h o rt -t e rm"
mu c h in d ic a t io n
withou t
preconditions)
re a lis t ic
f o rwa rC
the
in t o
take
f o r: wa rd b y No rt h
d iv e rs it y
of
seeond case very
of
h a rd ly
by the
formulat io n
case a goal
i nd ica ti on
but
f o rwa rd
to
q o a l?
the
case
mo re t h a n
should be withcut
K or y o a s p u t
of
c ompare this
list
put
preserves
The fo r m ulation
in t e re s t
two sys t e ms f o r: t h e
the
A u s t ri-a n
the
u p u n if ic a t io n ,
be of
mig h t
goal
be a long-term
n ight
diffe r e n ces
in
h e ld
the pr:oces s , wh a t a b o u t
So much for
in g
that
that
A n d in
A u s t ria ,
in the ccnring negotiations
account
sta te
S tates
point
Union--a
to
could
b e a g : : e a t st e p
s p e a k in g
if
not
it
a c o n-
had not
been
4
fo r
fact
th e
sym bo lic
that
recognition
How should
the
would
would
that
withdrawal
a credibl-e
there
are
the
case
least
from
defense,
models
where
mission
Korean
Geneva"
Korea
big
of
trade
a m or e actirre
in
the
roughly
Europe,
all
the
powers
same time
countries
not"
As an aside:
but
of
mentioned
l-atter
creation
of
them
that
of
type
for
interesting
From Yugoslavia
neutral
a lot
about
can meet,
A unified
have
Korea
e\/en creating
out
in t e n s e ly
of
o n lv
a ll
the
p o we r: s o n a ll
than
S wit z e rla n d ,
Cal-vinj-stZProtestant
Korea
can
s id e s "
learn
Panmunjom
is
about
h is t o ry
to
A u s t ria
h e n c e t h e re
as
also
as
a
a
considerable.
the
of
b e an
d is p la y s
a re d iff e r -
and fr:om Catholic
a lot,
field
make this
industrv
not
about
conferences,
should
of that
K o re a c a n le a rn
a power
in
country
defens ive
particularly
and more
abo u t wh a t i-t me a n s c o n c re t e ly
with
neutrality
to learn frorn
general,
by s t u d y in g
also
learn
the eoonmoic value
a unified
partner
can
confl-ict
affairs,
world
unification
ne g o ti ati onsn
things
powers
and what
in
in
a small,
of
Fr om A ustria
p r o ce ss
in
the
in
four
neutrality,
and at
For
point
the
in
itself
assert
basic
all
for
troops
Switzerland
su"mmit meetings
acti ve
all
type
be with
to
b e g iv e n .
has to
the
unification
five
significance
a place
this
No doubt,
and ai:med neutrality
the
of
a n d Hu n g a ry a re t w o :
Korea.
of
Thus,
defense
of
A u s t ria
c irc u ms t a n c e
have
of
defensive
at
tha t
system?
be an exchange
implying
major
of
o n e n a t io n ,
a confederation
inter:national
negotiations
ent
K orea is
from
approaches.
Sivitzerland
5
about
negative
of
construct
how to
defense
defensive
Korea,
In
aspects"
addi tioir
also
of
Fr om S weden a unified
ba sis
non-alignment,
And fr:om Finland
im p ortance
the
so cie t- i es
type s.
in
of
still
w i th
biq
th e
Thus,
for
K ore a will-
a long
not only
politic a l
a ttr a cti ve
for
is
, not only
the world
si m ply
co u ld
the defusion
escalate
Kor e a n s as it
ti on
into
of
certainly
is
also
of
k in d
t h is
c o n f lic t
t h re a t e n in g
not
wo u ld m e a n
that
o n ly
o n ce m o r e
to
the
howe v e r,
it
ma y b e a rg u e d t h a t
is
corres p o n d
Ko r e a n people--whether
the goal
t h e wh o le r: e g io n t h e wh o l e w o r : l d '
type mentioned
would
f e a s ib le
to
of
state
run,
her contacts
t h e wh o le re g rio n a n d t h e r e b y
s o u rc e o f
wa r/
s o c ia lis t
K o re a .
p re s e n t ;
Wh a t a p ro c e s s
a ma jo r
of
v a ri o u s
wa s , b u t
longer
u n itar :y
for
a terri b l-e
In the
the
K o re a b u t
of
re t a in
s e e m re la t iv e ly
is
as a whole,
her
c o me , a n d a ls o
will
about
t h e mo re c lo s e d
c o u n t rie s
p a rt
f ro m a
sornethinq
ma n y o f
on that
s a me
p e a c e in it ia t ive s .
learn
wit h
re t a in
does t h e p ro c e s s
p.r ovid e d a minimum of
for
to
t ime
bor d e rin g
countries
can
the
d ip lo ma c y
s o c ia lis t
the
sys t e m,
the world
a unified
to
defense,
go o d c o n n e c t io n s
having
model-
another
ma n v o f
a c t iv e
Korea
a unified
and
resistance.
le a rn
no n -p ro v o c a t iv e
No doubt North
fea tur e s
and norrnih"taqr
K o re a c o u ld
offer
inLerest
considerable
fro m A u s t ria ;
as she can learn
of
Yugoslavs
the
nicre based on paramilitar:y
thin g s
ar:e positive
federations--there
that
It
a rt if ic ia l,
better
a rq u me n t
to
is
the
a confedera-
ma y b e a rg u e d t h a t
a s p ira t io rF
e mp iric a lly
v a lid
of
the
or not"
a
6
IVha t se ems to be the
a u n itar y
state
the r e ar e,
of
all
without
course,
the middle,
in
Of course,
de m o cr a tic
it
is
d ive r se
obvious
it
m ig h t
it
Ch in e se philosophy
w i th
the
for
that
be better
be t h a t
"one c o u n t ry ,
An d it
p r o b le m
so lve d :
ship s
of
is
the
than
only
th e p e o p le,
conv e rg e n c e
in
that
K orean
the problem
see the
ha v e n o t
other
of
bu ild in g
a ne w, c ooperative
setting
m i gh t
rn the
wo r ld .
of
than
u n it y
test
the
s e t t in g
a d d it io n
to
d e mo c ra c y ,
f ro m rig h t ,
of
of
view
a n d u n it a ry
of
Tnrcrdonendence
t imo -
that
t ie
the
s e c o nd b a s i c
s e p a ra t io n --c a n
A s ro n g a s b o t h
the
h a rd ,
re p re s s iv e
will
not
b e : : e la x e rj.
the
a
continue
to
a n d a mu c h mo re p a rt ic ip a t o ry
in t e re s t
he r e :
c u r: re n t
a s a p e a c e -b u ird in q
K orea a s a t h re a t
from left-and
co me about-
stood
a lt e rn a t irz e
nat io n --in
the
a
t wo p a r t s "
e c o n o mic p o in t
t wo s y s t e ms "
E uro p e a n t ra d it io n
in t e re s t
b e t we e n t h e
t o p ra c t ic e
of
in
d e c id e
mo re c o h e s irz e t h a n
f ro m a wo rld
t-he c o u n t ry
Meetinq
d e mo c ra t s "
be of
s y mb io s is
for
And here
accordinq to social rienocrats.
mig h t
s y s t e m is
of
c o n c e iv e
K o re a c a p it a l i s t ,
of
K o r: e a n s t o d e c ic le a n d t o
a well-wo rk in g
conventional
m u ch stronger
a ll
K o re a s o c ia l
of
a un it a ry
system s which certainly
is
a ll
to
e c o n o mic s y s t e m
B ut on e re f le c t io n
may also
d if f ic u lt
words; vfrrere reason is,
is
system with
M o r e o ve r,
or
other
manner"
not
is
p o s s ib ilit ie s :
three
this
it
that
a mo re u n it a ry
Ko::ea socialist,
of
in
case is
K o re a n n a t io n .
be
leader-
g ri p
on
Create
s e t t in g
And the
*
given
Talk
of
Ha waii,
in
tha t
to
the
10 January
meeting,
Paig e o f
the
R eve r e n d
Ki
th e m a terial
m y o wn effort
1986"
university]
the
in
to
of
paqoda,
append j-x a n d f o r
explore
The C ar e of
K orea,"
cop e n h a gen,
1980, pp.
bu ild in q
a cold
the
K o re a n s t u d e n t s ,
to
one s t a t e ,
war cont e x t ,
Spo ke sm an, Nottinqham,
1984 ,
For
a rs o
s p o n s o rin q
T wo S t a t e s
a g e n e ra l
G le n n D "
s c ie n c e , a n d
Ho n o lu ru ;
E ssel:_ g -! -_ g g q g e F e g e a f c h ,
147-1 6 8 "
P ro f e s s o r
p o l-it ic a l
K o re a n s it u a t io n ,
Un iv e rsi t y
t h e p a rt ic ip a n t s
t o my f rie n rls
De p a rt me n t
Dae won
the
of
r a m in d e b t e d
and above a ll
N ati - on s as a P rocess:
in
A ss o c ia t io n
for
s u p p ly in g
t h e me e t in q "
For
s e e " Div id e d
a n d T n -B e t we e n ;
VoI.
V , E jle rs ,
a p p ro a c h
t o p e ac e -
s e e T h e re A re A lt e rn a t iv e s ,
A p p e n d ix
A
TEN-POINT PROPOSALFOR A DEMOCRATICREPUBLIC OF KORYO
(o c t o b e r
I0, 1980)
from K im I1 S ung , " Re p o rt t o t h e S ix t h Co n g re s s o f t h e
Excer p ts
of K orea o n t h e Wo rk o f t h e Ce n t ra l
Co mmit t e e , "
Wo r ke r s'P arty
(I980
),
1
4
-6
8
.
Kor e a Todav, I1, 29O
t h a t t h e mo 6 t re a lis t ic
O ur P arty con6ider6
a n d re a s o n ab l e
p e a c e f u lly
in d e p e n d e n t ly ,
the countr y
hr a y to reunify
and on the
pr in cip le
u n it y
is t o b rin g t h e n o rt h a n d
of great nation a l
state,
into a con f e d e ra l
le a v in g
t h e id e a s an d
sou th together
in n o rt h a n d s o u t h a s t h e y a re . . . .
systemg existing
socia l
(p . 4 s) .
t h e c o n f e d e ra l
It would be a good id e a t o c a ll
s t a t e t he
o
f
K
o
ry
o
Re
p
u
b
lic
s t at e
after
a u n if ie d
D em o cr atic Confederal
a
n
d
in
our
c
o
u
n
t
ry
is
we ll k n o wn t o t h e
tha t o nce existed
t h e c o mmo n a s p ira t io n s
and by reflecting
o f n o rt h a n d
wo r Id,
so u th for democracy.
c o u n t ry wh ic h d o e s n o t
The DCRK should be a n e u t ra l
politic
a
l-milit
a
ry
pa r ti ci pate
a llia n c e
in any
o r b lo c . . . .
( p , 4 6 ).
t h a t t h e DCRK s h o u ld p u t
o u r P arty deems it ap p ro p ria t e
p o lic y :
fo r wa r d and carry out the f o llo win g
the DCRK should a d h e re t o in d e p e n d e n c e in a I l s t a t e
Fir st,
p o lic y . . . .
(p . 4 5 ).
an in d e p e n d e n t
a cti vi tie s
and foIlow
d e mo c ra c y t h ro u g h o u t
Se cond, the DCRK eho u ld e f f e c t
a n d p ro mo t e g re a t
cou n tr y and in aII sphere s o f s o c ie t y
(p.
unity....
46).
n a ti on a l
the DCRK shou ld b rin g a b o u t e c o n o mic
Third,
exch a n ge between north a n d s o u t h a n d e n s u re t h e
e c o n o my . . . . (p . 4 7 ).
a n i nd e pendent national
the
c o o p e ra t io n
d e v e lo p me n t
and
of
the DCRK sho u ld re a liz e
n o rt h -s o u t h
e x c h a n g e a nd
Fourth,
c u lt u re
a n d e d u c a t io n
co o p e r a tion
in the spheres o f s c ie n c e ,
progre6 e in t h e c o u n t ry ' 6
s c ie n c e a n d
a n d en 6ure uniforn
a n d a rt 6 ,
a n d n a t io n a l
te ch n o logy,
national
cult u re
e d u ca ti on. . .. (p. 47).
the DCRK should re o p e n t h e s u s p e n d e d t ra n s p o rt
Fi fth,
between n o rt h a n d B o u t h a n d e n s u re f re e
co m m u n ications
a n d c o mn u n ic a t io n s
uti l i zati on
of the neans o f t ra n s p o rt
p a r ts of the count ry. .. . (p . 4 8 ) .
and
in
all
ii
the DCRK shoul d e n g u re a s t a b le
I iv e lih o o d
si xth,
f o r th e
p e a s a n t s a n d o t h e r wo r k i n g
people including
t h e wo rk e rs ,
en ti r e
we lf a re s y s t e n a t ic a 1 ly . . . . ( p . 4 8 ) .
r n a 6 se s and prorlote their
c o n f ro n t a t io n
Seventh, the DCRK shou ld re n o v e n ilit a ry
a rmy to
be tw ee n north and south an d f o rn a c o mb in e d n a t io n a l
f ro m o u t s id e . . . . T h e
confederal
d e fen d the nation from inv a s io n
s t re n g t h
to 100,000 to 150,000
sta te should reduce the m it it a ry
c o n f ro n t a t io n
b e tw e e n
in order to e n d t h e n ilit a ry
r esp e cti v ely
s t rif e
to an end for
n o r th and south and bring f ra t ric id a l
good.
t o a b o lis h
t h e Milit a r y
A t the sane tine it is e s s e n t ia l
aII
D em a r cation Line between n o rt h a n d e o u t h , d is ma n t le
in it s v ic in it y ,
installations
d is s o lv e
n ilit ia
m i l i ta r y
ru ilit a ry
of
in both par t s a n d p ro h ib it
t ra in in g
o r g a n izations
(pp.
48-49).
civiIi an s....
Eig hth,
the DCRK shou ld d e f e n d a n d p ro t e c t
4 9 ).
of aII K oreane o v e rs e a 8 . . . . (p .
i nter e 6 tB
the
rig h t e
the DCRK should h a n d le p ro p e rly
t h e f o re ig n
Nin th,
by t h e n o rt h a n d s o u t h p rio r
established
to
r e la ti on s
t h e f o re ig n
a c t iv it ie s
and should c o o rd in a t e
r e u n ifi cation,
governme n t s in a u n if ie d
wa y . . . . (p .
the th r o regional
4 9 ).
a a a u n if ie d
Ten th, tbe DCRK should ,
re la t io n s
w ho le nation,
develop frien d ly
f o re ig n
the lr o r Id and pursue a pe a c e f u l
s t a t e re p re s e n t in q r
wit h a lI c o u n t rie s
p o lic y . . . .
(p . 4 9 ).
and
of
the
of
(tr
Appendix B
PROPOSAL OF TWENTY PILOT PROJECTS TO F'ACILITATE
NATIONAL RECONCILIATION AND DEMOCRATIC REUNIF'ICATION
(February
I,
I982)
F r o n "Pro p o sa l o f Mi n i 6 ter
Pr a c t i c al
P i Io t P ro j e ct6 ,'
0 2 8 ( M a rch 1 9 8 2 ), 7 O-7 2 .
o f Na t io n a l
S o u t h -No rt h
Un if ic a t io n
Dia lo q u e
in
for
K o re a ,
No.
(1)
and o p e n in g o f a h ig h wa y
The connecting
and P yongyang a6 a me a n 6 o f g u a ra n t e e in g
between the S outh a n d t h e No rt h .
(2)
The realization
of
separated families,
(3)
The designating
S orak and south
tourist
zone.
(4)
managem e n t o f h o me la n d v is it s
The joint
K orean residents
a n d t h e ir
f re e t ra v e l
sides by way of Pa n n u n jo m.
(s)
The opening of the h a rb o rs o f I n c h o n a n d Ch in n a mp o to
free tr a d e b e t rre e n t h e S o u t h a n d t h e No rth .
facilitate
( 6)
of fre e lis t e n in g
The allowing
t o e a c h o t h e r' 6
re g u lar
p ro p a g an d a
radio programs thr o u g h t h e re mo v a l o f t ric k y
and janning facilitie s
f o r t h e p ro mo t io n o f mu t u a l
bethre e n t h e S o u t h a n d t h e No rt h .
understanding
( 7\
The participation
o f No rt h K o re a n d e le g a t io n s
1986 A sian Ganee a n d 1 9 8 8 O ly rn p ia d , a n d t h e ir
the S outh by way o f P a n n u n jo m.
(8)
The allowing
of aI I
S outh and the Nort h
of P anmunjom.
(e)
The creation
of fishermen
( 10 )
The conducting
of mu t u a l g o o d will
v is it s
f ro m v a rio u s
circles,
such a6 p o lit ic ia n s ,
b u 6 in e s s me n , y o u t h E a nd
6tudent6,
workers,
writ e rs
a n d a rt i6 t s ,
a n d s p o rt s me n,
to inprove relations
and foster
t ru s t
b e t we e n t h e S o u t h
and the North.
of
of
between Seoul
fr ee passage
p o s t a L e x c h a n g e s a n d r eunion of
t h e re b y e a s in g t h e ir
suf fer ings .
a n d o p e n in g o f t h e a re a n o rt h o f Mt .
of t h e Dia mo n d Mo u n t a in s a a a jo in t
jo in t
bo t h
f o re ig n e re
wis h in g
f re e a c c e s s t o t h e
b y o v e rs e a e
b e t we e n t h e tw o
in t h e
e n t ry
into
t o v is it
the
t n o a re a a b y w a y
f is h e ry
z o n e 6 f o r t h e c o n v e n ie n c e
t h e S o u t h a n d t h e No rt h .
IV
( If)
o f f re e p re 6 6 c o v e ra g e b y t h e
The guaranteeing
journalists
of the t lt o s id e s in e a c h o t h e r' s
a re a
re p o rt in g
the corre c t
o f t h e re a lit ie s
facilitate
of the S o u t h a n d t h e No rt h .
societies
jo in t
re s e a rc h o n n a t io n a l
p re s e rv in g
a n d d e v e t o p in g
to
of
( f2)
of
The undertaking
for the purpose of
culture.
national
( 13 )
ma t c h e s in v a rio u s
The exchange of go o d will
of
f ie ld s
g a me s u n d er
in in t e rn a t io n a l
6ports and participa t io n
b e t we e n t h e S o u t h a n d t h e No rt h .
delegation
single
( 14 )
The trading
convenience
( f5 )
developn e n t
The joint
between t h e
resources
economY .
national
( f6)
a n d e x h ib it io n s
The exchange ol te c h n ic ia n s
produ c t s
t o c o n t rib u t e
to the
manufactured
of the S o u t h a n d t h e No rt h .
developnent
(17)
of sp o rt s
The creation
Zone f o r
Denilitarized
S outh and the Nort h .
of
of
prod u c t s
re6 id e n t 6
o f d a ily
of both
n e c e s s it y
s id e s .
a n d u t iliz a t io n
South and the
f a c ilit ie s
g o o d will
the
h is t o ry
the
for
the
o f n a t u ra l
No rt h t o e n h a n c e t h e
of
in d u s t ria l
in s id e
the
n a t c h e 6 b e t we e n
the
( I8 )
of a jo in t
The conducting
6y6tem o f t h e
ecological
Zon e .
Demilitarized
( f9)
The complete remov a l o f n ilit a ry
f a c ilit ie s
Z o n e in o rd e r t o a lle v ia t e
the Demilitarized
tension
between th e S o u t h a n d t h e No rt h .
(2O)
of n e a 6 u re 6 t o c o n t ro l
a rm6 b e t we e n th e
The discussion
a n d t h e in s t a llin g
of
a n d o p e ra t io n
S outh and the North ,
lin e b e t h re e n t h e o f f ic ia ls
telephone
a direct
for the milit a ry
o f t h e t h ro s id e s .
a f f a irs
responsible
a c a d e n ic s u rv e y t o s t u d y t h e
f a u n a a n d f lo ra
the
in s id e
f ro m wit hi n
milit a ry