Root growth responses to soil physical conditions. Scottish Crop Research Institute Tracy A. Valentine, Kirsty Binnie, Joachim Hans, Blair M. McKenzie and A. Glyn Bengough Scottish Crop Research Institute, Dundee. Background • Roots experience a range of physical constraints including mechanical impedance, water stress and oxygen deficiency. • We are linking studies of soil physical properties to root responses invitro and in the field. Soil physical environment Root responses to soil conditions Soil strength depends on soil type, water potential, and structure. Computer visualisation of root growth Aims: Quantify cell expansion and root growth over short time intervals to study control of root responses under stress. 5 No till Compact 4 3 Deep plough Min till 2 Particle Image Velocimetry (P.I.V.) tracks pixel patches between images to measure growth, with a 2 min resolution. 1 A 0 0.7% (w/v) agar D 2% (w/v) agar G 200 Genes: Arabidopsis At3g54890 (to monitor extraction efficiency); Barley GAPDH (root internal standard); Barley BPW (target gene associated with water transport). Barley root RNA from 3 tillage treatments: Graphs show PCR using Light cycler for AtSPIKE (A), GAPDH (B) and BPW (C) sequences. 300 400 5 pixels 2 1 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 F C 3 1.2 1.0 0.2 100 200 300 400 500 600 x coordinate 4 H 1.4 1.2 I -0.004 -0.004 -0.003 -0.003 -0.002 -0.002 -0.001 -0.001 Strain rate (/min) We are developing methods for studying expression of root genes in relation to soil physical conditions. E 1.4 200 Strain rate (/min) Root gene expression in field soil B 100 0.000 0 Velocity (µm/min) Soil strength (penetrometer resistance) increases as soil dries, and is greatest in compacted soil. Roots can experience large mechanical impedance even at field capacity y coordinate 25 50 Water tension (kPa) Velocity (µm/min) 10 Velocity (µm/min) Penetrometer resistance (MPa) 6 Mechanically impeded roots are shorter and fatter with more border cells. 200 400 600 800 Distance from quiescent centre (µm) P.I.V. process (A-C). A: Patch placement on confocal image. B: Displacement vector field showing direction and relative movement of patches. C: Calculated velocity of patches verses distance from quiescent centre. 0.000 100200300400500600700 100200300400500600700 Distance from quiescent centre (µm) D-I: Arabidopsis growth on 0.7% agar (D-F) and 2% agar (G-I) using P.I.V. Confocal images of roots (D,G). Root tissue velocity as related to position along the root length (E,H) Strain rate calculated from velocity curves (F, I). A More border cells are associated with nutrient stress and mechanical impedance. Effect of nutrient availabiity on border cell numbers Border cell counts B 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 C24 N60000 0.1MS 0.5MS Nutrient stress induces border cell production in Arabidopsis. C We are screening for mutants that have altered border cell responses under nutrient and physical stress. Future work 1. Quantify soil physical stresses experienced in field throughout season 2. Measure variation in root gene expression (including border cell genes), for in vitro, and soil grown roots. 3. Computer visualisation - development of a model to track cell features and extract cell expansion data, so that gene function can be related to growth in soil environment. Acknowledgements - SCRI receives grant-in-aid from SEERAD. Computer visualisation and modelling of plant morphogenesis is funded by BBRSC. Dr. D. White (Cambridge University) for access to P.I.V. code.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz