The Global Spread of Healthcare-Associated

HEALTHCARE EPIDEMIOLOGY
INVITED ARTICLE
Robert A. Weinstein, Section Editor
The Global Spread of Healthcare-Associated
Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: A Perspective
From Asia
James S. Molton,1,2 Paul A. Tambyah,1,2 Brenda S. P. Ang,3 Moi Lin Ling,4 and Dale A. Fisher1,2
1
Division of Infectious Diseases, National University Health System; 2Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University
of Singapore; 3Department of Infectious Diseases, Tan Tock Seng Hospital; and 4Department of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital,
Singapore
Since antibiotics were first used, each new introduced class has been followed by a global wave of emergent
resistance, largely originating in Europe and North America where they were first used. Methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus spread from the United Kingdom and North America across Europe and then Asia
over more than a decade. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase–
producing K. pneumoniae followed a similar path some 20 years later. Recently however, metallo-β-lactamases
have originated in Asia. New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase–1 was found in almost every continent within a year
of its emergence in India. Metallo-β-lactamase enzymes are encoded on highly transmissible plasmids that
spread rapidly between bacteria, rather than relying on clonal proliferation. Global air travel may have helped
facilitate rapid dissemination. As the antibiotic pipeline offers little in the short term, our most important
tools against the spread of antibiotic resistant organisms are intensified infection control, surveillance, and
antimicrobial stewardship.
Keywords. bacterial drug resistance; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus; extended-spectrum beta-lactamase; carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.
In addition to being detected in wild animals and
remote human communities with little or no antibiotic exposure, antimicrobial resistance genes have been
identified in bacterial DNA frozen in Arctic permafrost for 30 000 years, and in bacteria in a subterranean cave isolated from the surface for >4 million
years [1]. But whereas antimicrobial resistance clearly
predates modern antibiotics, the advent and mass production of antibiotics since the 1940s resulted in unprecedented selection pressure. Alexander Fleming
was aware of the potential consequences as early as
Received 5 October 2012; accepted 9 January 2013; electronically published 18
January 2013.
Correspondence: Dale Fisher, FRACP, National University Health System, Level
10, Department of Medicine, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119228 (mdcfda@
nus.edu.sg).
Clinical Infectious Diseases 2013;56(9):1310–8
© The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious
Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail:
[email protected].
DOI: 10.1093/cid/cit020
1310
•
CID 2013:56 (1 May)
•
HEALTHCARE EPIDEMIOLOGY
1945, warning of the risk of emergent resistance in his
Nobel prize lecture [2]. Just 3 years after Fleming’s
speech, one London hospital reported Staphylococcus
aureus penicillin resistance rates of 38% [3]. Each successive antibiotic introduction has been followed by
global emergence of resistance, frequently starting in
hospital settings (Figure 1). Asia faces a greater
burden of gram-negative resistance compared to the
West [4]. The potential for global spread is illustrated
by the dissemination of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase 1 (NDM-1) rapidly from India to the West, and
the slower spread of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) from West to East.
This review describes the global epidemiology of the
major antibiotic-resistant bacteria over the past few
decades, focusing on Singapore’s epidemiology and response. In much of Asia, surveillance of antimicrobial
resistance is hampered by political and financial constraints. Singapore has a developed economy with a
large migrant population and significant health
Figure 1. Antibiotic timeline. This timeline indicates the approximate dates that the major antibiotic classes or important antibiotics of each class were
introduced into clinical use. The dates that resistant organisms were identified are shown in the centre of the timeline. Abbreviations: AmpC,
AmpC–producing Enterobacteriaceae; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae; KPC, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase–
producing Enterobacteriaceae; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; NDM-1, New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-1–producing Enterobacteriaceae; PRSA, penicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; VRE, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus; VRSA, vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
tourism. Its strategic international location allows it to serve as
a sentinel site for monitoring the emergence and spread of
resistant organisms.
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was first
identified in the United Kingdom in 1961, only 2 years after
the introduction of methicillin [5]. Over the next few decades
MRSA became established in hospitals throughout North
America and Europe, and subsequently Northeast, then
Southeast, Asia (Figure 2). In North America and Europe in
the 1970s and 1980s, healthcare-associated MRSA (HAMRSA) strains traditionally carried staphylococcal cassette
chromosome (SCC) type II, for example, USA100 (ST5) and
USA200 (ST36). However, with the exception of USA100 in
Japan, these strains have never become established in Asia. In
Singaporean hospitals the SCCmec type III strain ST239 was
endemic during this period [6]. All these strains are typically
susceptible only to vancomycin, fusidic acid, and rifampicin.
The early 2000s saw the emergence of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) clones, which previously had mainly
been confined to isolated primarily rural communities
(Figure 2). The nonmultiresistant USA 300, (CC8-ST8,
SCCmec IV, Panton-Valentine leukocidin positive) strain
emerged in the community in the United States, causing
severe skin and soft-tissue infections and necrotizing pneumonia. This clone is typically susceptible to non–β-lactam antibiotics. It has never become established in Asia, for reasons
that remain unclear. However, other SCCmec type IV CAMRSA clones have become prevalent in the community in
some Asian countries [7]. In many parts of Asia the major
HA-MRSA clones that were endemic in hospitals, including
ST239, have spread to the community, and CA-MRSA clones
have become established in hospitals [8]. The terms “healthcare-associated” and “community-associated” are now therefore becoming largely historical.
In the United States and some European countries, including the United Kingdom, MRSA rates are actually falling [7].
This is likely due in part to the introduction of a care-bundle
approach of improved infection control, screening, and decolonization, as well as restriction of some antibiotic classes.
Alternatively, it may reflect biological factors rather than
human effort [9]. Many Asian countries still have increasing
rates, but in Singapore stabilization over the past 5 years is
evident. Over the past decade, Singapore’s hospital-adapted
ST239 strain has to some extent been replaced by UKEMRSA-15 (ST22, SCCmec type IV) [6]. EMRSA-15 is a
healthcare-associated strain that emerged in the United
Kingdom in 1991, which, along with EMRSA-16, replaced the
majority of the United Kingdom’s HA-MRSA strains by the
late 1990s [10]. EMRSA-15 is usually resistant to erythromycin
HEALTHCARE EPIDEMIOLOGY
•
CID 2013:56 (1 May)
•
1311
Figure 2. Global dissemination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). This map indicates the countries in each continent providing
the earliest reports of healthcare-associated MRSA, community-associated MRSA, and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. The white
arrows indicate the early movements of healthcare-associated MRSA around the world. Poor surveillance is highlighted by the lack of data for some
regions. Abbreviations: MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; UK, United Kingdom.
and ciprofloxacin but susceptible to other non–β-lactam antibiotics such as trimethroprim-sulfamethoxazole.
Reducing MRSA colonization and infection rates are becoming a priority for hospital administrations, given the
excess risk of death in patients with MRSA clinical infection
(odds ratio, 5.5) [11]. In Singapore hospitals, MRSA is
endemic. At the National University Hospital, approximately
25% of all inpatient beds are dedicated to cohorting patients
with MRSA infection or colonization and 8% of all inpatients
are found to test positive via active surveillance on admission.
Since the introduction of enhanced infection control measures
(described later), MRSA colonization acquisition rates as determined by a single swab on discharge have dropped from
>10% five years ago, to <2% in intensive care units and <4%
in the general wards today (D. Fisher and colleagues, unpublished data).
Vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) was first identified in Japan in 1996 (Figure 2) [12]. Seven cases of heteroVISA were identified in Singapore in 2001 [13] and a study in
2005–2006 identified 7 cases of VISA and 3 hetero-VISA [14].
However, at 0.2%, rates of reduced susceptibility to vancomycin are still well below those seen in some North American
centers. Until recently, reports of vancomycin-resistant S.
aureus (VRSA) in Asia were limited to Japan, but in 2011 a
1312
•
CID 2013:56 (1 May)
•
HEALTHCARE EPIDEMIOLOGY
number of vanA-positive and also vanA-negative VRSA isolates were identified in Hyderabad, India [15]. VRSA has
never been identified in Singapore. However in 2010, 6 cases
of daptomycin-nonsusceptible S. aureus bacteremia were reported, all in patients previously treated with vancomycin [16]. Despite the emergence of linezolid-resistant S. aureus
in Spain and Japan, no Singaporean cases have been reported
to date [17, 18].
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci
Vancomycin had been used since the 1950s, but the emergence of resistance in Enterococcus species was not reported
until 1988, in the United Kingdom and France [19]. Incremental vancomycin usage for MRSA infection may explain
the timing. Over the next decade, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) spread throughout Europe and North
America (Figure 3). Vancomycin resistance is predominantly
mediated by vanA or vanB genes, both most likely having
emerged in Europe. VanB differs phenotypically in that it
retains susceptibility to teicoplanin. Most VRE cases in
Europe, the United States, and Korea are now due to vanA,
whereas the epidemic in Singapore and Australia has predominantly been vanB, although Singapore has recently seen a
Figure 3. Global dissemination of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). This map indicates the countries in each continent providing the earliest
reports of VRE. While most of the world’s VRE is vanA, Southeast Asia and Australasia experience predominantly vanB. Poor surveillance is highlighted
by the lack of data for some regions. Abbreviations: VRE, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus; UK, United Kingdom.
number of vanA cases. In the United Kingdom, vanA is now
seen in 15%–25% of Enterococcus faecium and 2%–3% of
Enterococcus faecalis, rates it reached in the early 1990s [9].
Rates of vancomycin resistance in US hospitals reached
much higher levels. By 2002, 60% of E. faecium and 2% of
E. faecalis were resistant to vancomycin [20], climbing further
to 80% in E. faecium and 7% in E. faecalis by 2007 [21]. As
with MRSA, rates have started to decline in some parts of the
West.
VRE was first reported in Singapore in 1994 [22]. Over the
next decade, while the West was seeing a steady rise, only
sporadic cases occurred in Singapore [23], until a single hospital outbreak in 2004 [24]. The following year, >5000 patients
were screened, including 84% of one hospital’s inpatients on a
single day. A total of 147 carriers and 4 clinical cases were
detected [25]. Pulsed-field typing revealed 1 major clone and
several minor clones of vanB E. faecium. All belonged to
clonal complex 17, a distinct genetic lineage of E. faecium implicated in hospital outbreaks worldwide [26]. It is likely that
these strains were imported. The first case isolated in 2004 was
in a patient from Indonesia, and the first case isolated in 2005
was in a Singaporean who had been hospitalized in India. Interestingly, a similar outbreak of vanB VRE had occurred in
Western Australia in 2001 [27]. Control measures for the next
5 years (see the section “Control of Antimicrobial Resistance”)
resulted in VRE rates that were lower than those in many
other developed nations. Outbreak strains, however, had
become established, and maintained a low level of endemicity
interspersed with occasional outbreaks [28]. Over the past 2
years, unlike in most Western countries, VRE rates in Singapore’s tertiary hospitals appear to have been trending upward,
particularly among renal and hematology patients. This
mirrors the pattern seen in countries outside Asia a decade
ago. The reasons for this delay are unclear.
Enterobacteriaceae
Extended-Spectrum and AmpC β-Lactamases
The extended-spectrum cephalosporins ceftriaxone and ceftazidime were introduced in the early 1980s. By 1985, reports came
out of Europe describing an extended-spectrum β-lactamase
(ESBL) in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli [29].
During the 1980s and 1990s, TEM- and SHV-type ESBLs carrying Klebsiella species spread, globally causing predominantly
nosocomial infections. CTX-M type ESBLs have proliferated
since 2000, initially in community E. coli and nosocomial
Klebsiella species strains [29]. In the late 1980s, the AmpC
cephalosporinase was discovered on plasmids in K. pneumoniae and E. coli [30]. Unlike ESBL, AmpC producers are
usually susceptible to cefepime. Together ESBL and AmpC
now make up the majority of the third-generation cephalosporin resistance seen worldwide. The distribution varies
HEALTHCARE EPIDEMIOLOGY
•
CID 2013:56 (1 May)
•
1313
dramatically by region, however. Nosocomial rates in North
America have stabilized at around 10% for E. coli and K. pneumoniae, and a little higher in European hospitals. In contrast,
in Asia, ESBL rates are >80% in India and >60% in China [9].
In Singapore, >30% of Klebsiella species–positive blood
culture isolates were resistant to third-generation cephalosporins by 1990. Rates have not changed significantly since then,
despite rising rates of third-generation cephalosporin use [31].
In fact, there is a recent trend toward decreasing resistance in
Klebsiella species, which is unexplained [32]. The first AmpCproducing E. coli in Singapore was documented in 2003 [31].
Between 2006 and 2007, clinical samples collected across 7
hospitals in Singapore again revealed approximately 30%
third-generation cephalosporin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae, of which ESBL rates were 19.6% in E. coli and 30.3% in
K. pneumoniae, and AmpC rates were 8.5% in E. coli and
5.6% in K. pneumoniae (based on phenotypic data) [33]. One
molecular study found that of 54 ceftriaxone-resistant E. coli
isolates, 69% were positive for blaCTX-M genes (group 1 and, to
a lesser extent, group 9), and 33% screened positive for AmpC
enzymes, of which 28% carried blaCMY-like ampC genes [34].
Current inpatient bacteremia rates of ceftriaxone or ceftazidime resistance are 47% for E. coli and 67% in K. pneumoniae
in Singapore, but these aggregate both community and hospital onset. In contrast, in India, the resistance rates in community E. coli are as high as the hospital rates, possibly because
of the unregulated use of antibiotics in the community, including in agriculture, and lower sanitary standards [35].
Carbapenemases
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are a significant and growing problem in Asia. Low-level resistance can
occur when high levels of AmpC or ESBL are combined with
porin deficiencies. High-level resistance is primarily mediated
by carbapenemases. The serine carbapenemase KPC was first
identified in North Carolina in 1996, and soon afterward
caused an outbreak in New York [36]. This enzyme inactivates
all β-lactams. KPC-producing K. pneumoniae followed the
movements of colonized patients to cause outbreaks in other
countries, including Israel in 2004 and Greece in 2007
(Figure 4). Spread is predominantly via clonal dissemination.
In Asia, KPC was initially detected in China in 2004, and subsequently South Korea and Taiwan [37]. In 2012, the first 4
cases of KPC were reported in Singapore [37, 38]. These
blaKPC-2 plasmid-containing K. pneumoniae isolates were
clonal, belonging to strain type 11 (ST11), and closely related
to the Chinese strain. They were identified from epidemiologically unrelated patients from 2 different hospitals. Two of the
patients were non-Chinese, with no recent travel, suggesting
dissemination of KPC in the community.
1314
•
CID 2013:56 (1 May)
•
HEALTHCARE EPIDEMIOLOGY
Metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) are a class of carbapenemases
that remain susceptible to aztreonam (but are frequently accompanied by aztreonam hydrolyzing EBSLs). The first
known plasmid-borne MBL was IMP-1, originally identified
from Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Japan in 1988 [39]. The first
case outside Japan was identified in K. pneumoniae in Singapore in 1996 [40]. While now endemic in Japan, this mechanism accounts for only a small percentage of carbapenem
resistance in Enterobacteriaceae in Singapore today. Verona
integron-encoded MBL (VIM), was first identified in Italy in
1997 but has never reached significance in Asia [29]. Of more
concern is the recently identified NDM-1. NDM-1 plasmidcarrying organisms frequently possess multiple resistance
mechanisms to other classes of antibiotics, typically rendering
the bacteria resistant to all antibiotics except polymyxin and
occasionally tigecycline [41]. NDM-1 was first reported from
an Indian patient managed in 2008 in Sweden who had been
transferred from a New Delhi hospital [42]. The following
year, NDM-1 was identified in 29 patients in the United
Kingdom and 143 patients from multiple sites in the Indian
subcontinent [43]. NDM-1 has now spread by plasmid transfer into a wide range of bacteria (both environmental organisms and potential human pathogens), and been identified in
sewage and tap water in India and Vietnam [44, 45]. Many
other countries around the world, including the United States,
have now reported sporadic cases in individuals returning
from the Indian subcontinent (Figure 4) [46].
Singapore has a multicultural population with significant
movement of people to and from the Indian subcontinent. It
is therefore not surprising that in 2011 12 NDM-1–positive
isolates were identified in Singapore, which represented 23%
of all CRE [47]. The multilocus sequence typing strains were
diverse, indicating that the clones were genetically unrelated.
Most patients were of non-Indian ethnicity, and none had
traveled overseas in the previous 2 years [48]. It is possible
that in addition to KPC, NDM-1–positive Enterobacteriaceae
are also now endemic in Singapore.
The most recent introduction to Singapore was OXA-181, a
class D β-lactamase (oxacillinase). OXA-48 has caused a
number of outbreaks in Europe and the Mediterranean countries [49], but is not endemic in the Americas yet. In the last
year, OXA-181, an OXA-48 variant recently identified in
India [50], has been reported in Singapore in K. pneumoniae
bloodstream isolates from 2 Bangladeshi patients [51]. Further
unpublished data suggest that it is now well established in
Singapore.
Overall, <1% of hospital-associated Enterobacteriaceae infections in Singapore are carbapenem resistant, but numbers
are increasing. By comparison, India’s rates are 5%–8% [52].
In Singapore, clinical isolates that screen positive for carbapenem resistance are referred to a reference laboratory for
Figure 4. Global dissemination of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase–producing K. pneumoniae and New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-1–producing
Enterobacteriaceae. The earliest reported cases in each continent are shown. Arrows indicate the significant international movements of these organisms. Abbreviations: KPC, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase; NDM-1, New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase–1; UK, United Kingdom.
carbapenemase detection by polymerase chain reaction. These
surveillance data reveal that of carbapenem-resistant isolates,
approximately 40% test positive for a carbapenemase, of which
approximately two-thirds are NDM-1, 20% are OXA-181, and
5%–10% are KPC. Sporadic detection of VIM and IMP continues. There are plans to introduce targeted admission screening
for CRE in all public hospitals in the coming year.
Recently in Thailand, the enhanced cleaning that was necessitated by widespread flooding of hospitals and intensive care
units resulted in the elimination of previously prevalent multidrug-resistant A. baumannii [55].
Although rates of resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to
the most commonly used antibiotic classes are typically high
in Southeast Asia [29], rates in Singapore remain significantly
lower than those of A. baumannii.
Nonfermenters
Control of Antimicrobial Resistance
In tropical regions including Southeast Asia, nosocomial Acinetobacter baumannii infections are more frequent than in
Europe and the United States. In addition, communityacquired infections can also occur [53]. Singapore has witnessed
the stepwise loss of antibiotic classes for treating A. baumannii
infection including carbapenems. Resistance to 3 or more
classes (multidrug-resistant A. baumannii) represented 44%
of isolates in Singapore between 2004 and 2007, as compared
to the overall proportion across 9 Asia-Pacific countries of
34.2% [54]. Now 55% of Singapore’s isolates are multidrug resistant and infection rates are increasing both in intensive care
units and general wards. Of concern is a small number of isolates that are truly panresistant, including to polymyxins. It is
hoped that enhanced isolation and environmental cleaning processes will control the spread of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii.
The reduction in rates of nosocomial MRSA, and until recently
VRE, was achieved with a coordinated interhospital infection
control response. A care-bundle approach was introduced,
which includes a checklist for routine hand hygiene and
aseptic technique during line care or invasive procedures
(which had not been optimally practiced in Singapore for
many years [56]). With this approach, Singapore now seems to
be following global trends in reducing central line–associated
bloodstream infections, although there are no peer-reviewed
data published. Enhanced environmental cleaning and active
surveillance of high-risk patients with electronic tagging of colonized patients’ medical records were introduced [25], with
isolation and cohorting of identified patients [25]. Now all new
patients are screened for MRSA and cohorted appropriately
HEALTHCARE EPIDEMIOLOGY
•
CID 2013:56 (1 May)
•
1315
without contact precautions except for specific indications.
Targeted patients undergo decolonization. However, the
background rate of MRSA is high, so unlike some parts of
Europe, widespread decolonization and eradication of MRSA
from the hospitals is not yet an achievable goal. Isolation of
patients with multidrug-resistant gram-negative organisms
aims to curtail nosocomial transmission, although the existing burden locally plus the contribution of community outbreaks from regional countries where these organisms have
been found in environmental sources will make control
challenging.
Antimicrobial stewardship is not well developed in Asia.
Broad-spectrum antimicrobial use in Singapore is higher than
in most developed countries, but so is antimicrobial resistance [57]. It is difficult to tease out cause and effect. Up to
38% of antibiotic prescriptions in Singaporean hospitals could
be considered inappropriate (mostly failure to de-escalate after
culture results were available) [58]. Antimicrobial stewardship
is now practiced in all major Singaporean hospitals, with evidence of a resulting shorter length of stay and fewer infectionrelated readmissions [59]. The effect on antimicrobial resistance
is yet to be shown. No data currently exist on community prescribing. In the community in Singapore, antibiotics require a
prescription, in contrast to most other countries in Asia.
Surveillance remains undeveloped in most Asian countries.
Singapore has escalated surveillance to provide leadership in
the region, and help to identify emerging resistance patterns.
All hospitals report rates to the Ministry of Health for MRSA,
VRE, carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa,
and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant and carbapenem-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae, as well as levels of
broad-spectrum antibiotic use. A National Antimicrobial Task
Force coordinates the response to antimicrobial resistance in
hospitals and long-term care facilities. This initiative aims to
monitor the clinical and molecular epidemiology and formalize lines of communication between the healthcare facilities to
better prepare for future challenges.
We can expect future resistant organisms to spread quickly,
independent of international boundaries. Containment requires a coordinated global approach. As well as improving
infection control, surveillance, and antimicrobial stewardship,
a recent World Health Organization report recommends reducing antimicrobial use in animal husbandry [60]. Although
ESBL-producing gram-negative organisms have repeatedly
been identified on fresh meat and vegetables, the true implications of this for human health are not known [61]. Almost all
meat for human consumption in Singapore is imported from
farms that are preaccredited through a process which includes
screening for antibiotic residues. Finally, the development of
new antibiotics, diagnostics, and vaccines can no longer be
1316
•
CID 2013:56 (1 May)
•
HEALTHCARE EPIDEMIOLOGY
relied upon. The approval of new antibiotics in the United
States has fallen from 30 between 1983 and 1992, to just 12
between 1998 and 2009 [62].
While historically, antibiotic resistance has followed the introduction of novel antibiotics in the West, the recent trend
toward the emergence of highly drug-resistant community associated strains in developing Asian countries where medical
resources are scarce is a cause for concern. There is potential
for unrecognized global spread of these organisms. Globally
connected cities such as Hong Kong and Singapore are
uniquely positioned to act as sentinels for the emergence of
resistant strains. At the same time, their modern healthcare
facilities offer unique opportunities for research into novel approaches to controlling the spread of these organisms.
Notes
Acknowledgments. We thank Dr Michelle Balm and Dr Hsu Li Yang
for provision of data and kind review of the manuscript.
Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts.
All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential
Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the
content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
References
1. Rolain JM, Canton R, Cornaglia G. Emergence of antibiotic resistance:
need for a new paradigm. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18:615–6.
2. The Nobel Committee. Fleming A. Penicillin. Available at: http://www.
nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1945/fleming-lecture.
pdf. Accessed 28 August 2012.
3. Barber M, Rozwadowska-Dowzenko M. Infection by penicillin-resistant staphylococci. Lancet 1948; 2:641–4.
4. Rosenthal VD, Bijie H, Maki DG, et al. International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) report, data summary of 36
countries, for 2004–2009. Am J Infect Control 2012; 40:396–407.
5. Barber M. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci. J Clin Pathol 1961;
14:385–93.
6. Teo J, Tan TY, Hon PY, et al. ST22 and ST239 MRSA duopoly in
Singaporean hospitals: 2006–2010. Epidemiol Infect 2012; 7:1–5.
7. Stefani S, Chung DR, Lindsay JA, et al. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): global epidemiology and harmonisation of
typing methods. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2012; 39:273–82.
8. Song JH, Hsueh PR, Chung DR, et al. Spread of methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus between the community and the hospitals in
Asian countries: an ANSORP study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;
66:1061–9.
9. Livermore DM. Fourteen years in resistance. Int J Antimicrob Agents
2012; 39:283–94.
10. Johnson AP, Aucken HM, Cavendish S, et al. Dominance of EMRSA15 and -16 among MRSA causing nosocomial bacteraemia in the UK:
analysis of isolates from the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (EARSS). J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 48:143–4.
11. Pada SK, Ding Y, Ling ML, et al. Economic and clinical impact of
nosocomial meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in
Singapore: a matched case-control study. J Hosp Infect 2011; 78:
36–40.
12. Hiramatsu K, Hanaki H, Ino T, Yabuta K, Oguri T, Tenover FC.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced
vancomycin susceptibility. J Antimicrob Chemother 1997; 40:135–6.
13. Sng LH, Koh TH, Wang GC, Hsu LY, Kapi M, Hiramatsu K. Heterogeneous vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (hetero-VISA) in
Singapore. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2005; 25:177–9.
14. Fong RK, Low J, Koh TH, Kurup A. Clinical features and treatment
outcomes of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA)
and heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus
(hVISA) in a tertiary care institution in Singapore. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2009; 28:983–7.
15. Thati V, Shivannavar CT, Gaddad SM. Vancomycin resistance among
methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from intensive care
units of tertiary care hospitals in Hyderabad. Indian J Med Res 2011;
134:704–8.
16. Hsu LY, Leong M, Balm M, et al. Six cases of daptomycin-nonsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in Singapore. J Med
Microbiol 2010; 59(Pt 12):1509–13.
17. Ikeda-Dantsuji Y, Hanaki H, Sakai F, et al. Linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from 2006 through 2008 at six hospitals in
Japan. J Infect Chemother 2011; 17:45–51.
18. Sanchez Garcia M, De la Torre MA, Morales G, et al. Clinical outbreak of linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an intensive care
unit. JAMA 2010; 303:2260–4.
19. Chavers LS, Moser SA, Benjamin WH, et al. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: 15 years and counting. J Hosp Infect 2003; 53:159–71.
20. Tacconelli E, Cataldo MA. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE):
transmission and control. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2008; 31:99–106.
21. Hidron AI, Edwards JR, Patel J, et al. NHSN annual update: antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare
Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
2006–2007. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008; 29:996–1011.
22. Ang SW, Seah CS, Lee ST. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in the
Singapore National Burns Centre: a case report. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1996; 25:270–2.
23. Oon LL, Ling ML, Chiew YF. Gastrointestinal colonisation of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus in a Singapore teaching hospital. Pathology 2001; 33:216–21.
24. Chlebicki MP, Ling ML, Koh TH, et al. First outbreak of colonization
and infection with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a
tertiary care hospital in Singapore. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
2006; 27:991–3.
25. Kurup A, Chlebicki MP, Ling ML, et al. Control of a hospital-wide
vancomycin-resistant enterococci outbreak. Am J Infect Control 2008;
36:206–11.
26. Koh TH, Hsu LY, Chiu LL, Lin RV. Emergence of epidemic clones of
vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in Singapore. J Hosp
Infect 2006; 63:234–6.
27. Christiansen KJ, Tibbett PA, Beresford W, et al. Eradication of a large
outbreak of a single strain of vanB vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus
faecium at a major Australian teaching hospital. Infect Control Hosp
Epidemiol 2004; 25:384–90.
28. Cai Y, Chan JP, Fisher DA, et al. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci in
Singaporean hospitals: 5-year results of a multi-centre surveillance
programme. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2012; 41:77–81.
29. Livermore DM. Current epidemiology and growing resistance of
gram-negative pathogens. Korean J Intern Med 2012; 27:128–42.
30. Hanson ND. AmpC beta-lactamases: what do we need to know for
the future? J Antimicrob Chemother 2003; 52:2–4.
31. Koh TH. Gram-negative resistance in Singapore: a historical perspective. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2008; 37:847–54.
32. Hsu LY, Tan TY, Tam VH, Kwa A, Fisher DA, Koh TH. Surveillance
and correlation of antibiotic prescription and resistance of gram-negative bacteria in Singaporean hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
2010; 54:1173–8.
33. Tan TY, Hsu LY, Koh TH, et al. Antibiotic resistance in gram-negative
bacilli: a Singapore perspective. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2008; 37:819–25.
34. Tan TY, Ng LS, He J, Hsu LY. CTX-M and ampC beta-lactamases
contributing to increased prevalence of ceftriaxone-resistant Escherichia coli in Changi General Hospital, Singapore. Diagn Microbiol
Infect Dis 2010; 66:210–3.
35. Chaudhuri BN, Rodrigues C, Balaji V, et al. Incidence of ESBL producers amongst gram-negative bacilli isolated from intra-abdominal
infections across India (based on SMART study, 2007 data). J Assoc
Physicians India 2011; 59:287–92.
36. Nordmann P, Cuzon G, Naas T. The real threat of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing bacteria. Lancet Infect Dis 2009;
9:228–36.
37. Venkatachalam I, Teo J, Balm MN, Fisher DA, Jureen R, Lin RT. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing enterobacteria in hospital, Singapore. Emerg Infect Dis 2012; 18:1381–3.
38. Balm MN, Ngan G, Jureen R, Lin RT, Teo J. Molecular characterization of newly emerged blaKPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in
Singapore. J Clin Microbiol 2012; 50:475–6.
39. Watanabe M, Iyobe S, Inoue M, Mitsuhashi S. Transferable imipenem
resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
1991; 35:147–51.
40. Koh TH, Babini GS, Woodford N, Sng LH, Hall LM, Livermore DM.
Carbapenem-hydrolysing IMP-1 beta-lactamase in Klebsiella pneumoniae from Singapore. Lancet 1999; 353:2162.
41. Nordmann P, Poirel L, Walsh TR, Livermore DM. The emerging
NDM carbapenemases. Trends Microbiol 2011; 19:588–95.
42. Yong D, Toleman MA, Giske CG, et al. Characterization of a new
metallo-beta-lactamase gene, bla(NDM-1), and a novel erythromycin
esterase gene carried on a unique genetic structure in Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 14 from India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
2009; 53:5046–54.
43. Kumarasamy KK, Toleman MA, Walsh TR, et al. Emergence of a new
antibiotic resistance mechanism in India, Pakistan, and the UK: a molecular, biological, and epidemiological study. Lancet Infect Dis 2010;
10:597–602.
44. Isozumi R, Yoshimatsu K, Yamashiro T, et al. bla(NDM-1)-positive
Klebsiella pneumoniae from environment, Vietnam. Emerg Infect Dis
2012; 18:1383–5.
45. Walsh TR, Weeks J, Livermore DM, Toleman MA. Dissemination of
NDM-1 positive bacteria in the New Delhi environment and its implications for human health: an environmental point prevalence study.
Lancet Infect Dis 2011; 11:355–62.
46. Wilson ME, Chen LH. NDM-1 and the role of travel in its dissemination. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2012; 14:213–26.
47. Teo J, Ngan G, Balm M, Jureen R, Krishnan P, Lin R. Molecular characterization of NDM-1 producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates in Singapore hospitals. West Pacific Surveill Response 2012; 3:1–6.
48. Marimuthu K, Teo J, Gan VC, Ng WK, Krishnan P, Ang B, Lye D.
Risk factors for locally acquired New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-1
Enterobacteriaceae in Singapore. In: European Congress of Clinical
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID), 2011.
49. Nordmann P, Dortet L, Poirel L. Carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: here is the storm! Trends Mol Med 2012; 18:263–72.
50. Castanheira M, Deshpande LM, Mathai D, Bell JM, Jones RN,
Mendes RE. Early dissemination of NDM-1- and OXA-181-producing
Enterobacteriaceae in Indian hospitals: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 2006–2007. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55:1274–8.
51. Koh TH, Cao DY, Chan KS, et al. bla(OXA-181)-positive Klebsiella
pneumoniae, Singapore. Emerg Infect Dis 2012; 18:1524–5.
52. Deshpande P, Shetty A, Kapadia F, Hedge A, Soman R, Rodrigues C.
New Delhi metallo 1: have carbapenems met their doom? Clin Infect
Dis 2010; 51:1222.
53. Falagas ME, Karveli EA, Kelesidis I, Kelesidis T. Community-acquired
Acinetobacter infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2007; 26:
857–68.
HEALTHCARE EPIDEMIOLOGY
•
CID 2013:56 (1 May)
•
1317
54. Bouchillon SK, Iredell JR, Barkham T, Lee K, Dowzicky MJ. Comparative in vitro activity of tigecycline and other antimicrobials against
gram-negative and gram-positive organisms collected from the AsiaPacific Rim as part of the Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance
Trial (TEST). Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009; 33:130–6.
55. Apisarnthanarak A, Li Yang H, Warren DK. Termination of an
extreme-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii outbreak in a hospital
after flooding: lessons learned. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 55:1589–90.
56. Tambyah PA, Kumarasinghe G. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus control at the National University Hospital, Singapore: a historical perspective. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2008; 37:855–60.
57. Liew YX, Krishnan P, Yeo CL, et al. Surveillance of broad-spectrum
antibiotic prescription in Singaporean hospitals: a 5-year longitudinal
study. PLoS One 2011; 6:e28751.
1318
•
CID 2013:56 (1 May)
•
HEALTHCARE EPIDEMIOLOGY
58. Liew YX, Lee W, Kwa AL, Lye DC, Yeo CL, Hsu LY. Inappropriate
carbapenem use in Singapore public hospitals: opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2011; 37:87–8.
59. Liew YX, Lee W, Loh JC, et al. Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship
programme on patient safety in Singapore General Hospital. Int J
Antimicrob Agents 2012; 40:55–60.
60. World Health Organization. The evolving threat of antimicrobial resistance: options for action. 2012. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.
int/publications/2012/9789241503181_eng.pdf. Accessed 7 August 2012.
61. Marshall BM, Levy SB. Food animals and antimicrobials: impacts on
human health. Clin Microbiol Rev 2011; 24:718–33.
62. Antibiotic Resistance 2012: The antibiotics development pipeline and
strategies to combat antibiotic resistance. Available at: http://www.bio
pharmreports.co.uk/Report_description.asp?id=66. Accessed 7 August 12.