Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Environmental Sciences 25 (2015) 199 – 205 7th Groundwater Symposium of the International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research (IAHR) Groundwater thermal monitoring to characterize streambed water fluxes of the Brenta river (Northern Italy) G. Passadorea*, A. Sottanib, L. Altissimoc, M. Puttid and A. Rinaldoa,e a Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile Edile e Ambientale e Centro Internazionale di Idrologia “Dino Tonini”, Università di Padova, via Marzolo 9, 35131 Padova, Italy b Sinergeo S.r.l., Contrà del Pozzetto 4, 36100 Vicenza, Italy c Centro Idrico di Novoledo, via Palladio 128, 36030 Villaverla (Vicenza), Italy d Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Padova, via Trieste 63, 35121 Padova, Italy e Laboratory of Ecohydrology ECHO/IIE/ENAC, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale Lausanne (EPFL), Station 2, GR C1 575, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland Abstract The work proposed deals with the characterization of temporal and spatial variability of water exchange fluxes from/to the Brenta river streambed (Veneto, Italy), critically important to regional water resources management. The aquifer system evolves from a large undifferentiated aquifer close to the adjacent mountain ranges, later developing into a well-structured multi-layer system made up of six well-defined confined aquifers constituting the noteworthy subsurface reservoirs of the area. A three-dimensional groundwater flow model of the multi-aquifer system of the Central Veneto, within a 3300 km2 area, integrating a large amount of data, has been developed to analyze the behaviour of this large, complex and well-monitored sedimentary system. The temporal and spatial variability of the water exchange flux is investigated using heat as a tracer in conjunction with water-level measurements (in the river and in piezometers close to the river): an effective method for estimating groundwater/surface water exchanges. In the study area, 5 groundwater monitoring wells (4 on the right bank, 1 on the left bank) were drilled along the river banks near a pilot transversal ramp (permeable river barrier) built in order to reduce the downstream flooding risk and to increase the river dispersion. A hydrothermal model of the river and of the underlying aquifer was implemented to improve the estimation of the water exchange between the Brenta river and the aquifer system. The contribution of exchange between the river and the underlying aquifer is quantified by comparing simulations of water flow and heat transport to observed temperature and levels in river and in groundwater. © by Elsevier B.V. This an open access © 2015 2015Published The Authors. Published by isElsevier B.V. article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the Scientific Committee of the IAHR Groundwater Symposium 2014. Peer-review under responsibility of the Scientific Committee of the IAHR Groundwater Symposium 2014 Keywords: Groundwater flow, Heat transport, Streambed flux, Geothermal surveys, Temperature, Numerical modelling * Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 349 827 5445; fax: +39 049 827 5446 E-mail address: [email protected] 1878-0296 © 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the Scientific Committee of the IAHR Groundwater Symposium 2014 doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2015.04.027 200 G. Passadore et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 25 (2015) 199 – 205 1. Introduction The area of interest is located in North-Eastern Italy (fig. 1) encompassing the large, deep multiaquifer groundwater reservoir formed in the quaternary de-posits of the Po plain sedimentary basin and the Brenta river system [1] [2]. In this area several projects are under investigation to withdraw water from the Brenta river both for aquifer recharge and anthropic consumption. Wise management of this resource needs to consider potential effects upstream and downstream of the area of interaction of the intimately coupled river and subsurface system. Spring emergence (termed risorgive, i.e. the spring sites where spatially widespread surficial emergence of the first phreatic aquifer occurs ephemerally) characterizes a broad area located roughly in correspondence to the transition from the unconfined to the confined aquifer system (fig. 1). Fig.1. Study Area (Central Veneto - Italy), model domain, boundary conditions, and phreatic surface - piezometric head contours with 10 m steps Recharge is mainly originated from the fractured system forming the Pre-Alps (the Asiago Plateau), by rain and by significant streambed dispersion of the Brenta river flowing from the Alps. A distinct feature of the subsurface basin is the presence of an undifferentiated unconfined aquifer system formed by alluvial deposits developing on a strip of roughly 5 to 20 km bordering the piedmont region and characterizing the entire Venetian plain. Outside this strip, a well-defined confined, multiaquifer system originates from the alternation of silty-clayey layers and sandy fine-grained aquifers. Both the undifferentiated and the multiaquifer systems are heavily exploited for urban, industrial and agricultural uses. The depth of the phreatic surface with respect to the ground level starts at a few tens of meters in the piedmont zone and gradually decreases to zero developing in a strip of spatially distributed plain springs just south of the appearance of the first low permeability lens, called the area of the risorgive (or G. Passadore et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 25 (2015) 199 – 205 fontanili). All groundwater levels maps realized using several data acquisition campaigns revels a different behaviour between the upper part of the Brenta river (from Bassano to spring emergence groundwater flux lines are diverging from the river) and the lower part of the Brenta river (from spring emergence to Carturo groundwater flux lines converge towards the river). The upper portion of the river, of about 12 km, is characterized by stream levels greater than groundwater levels and so there is a water flux from river to aquifer through streambed; in the lower part of the Brenta river, of about 13 km, stream levels are lower than groundwater levels (which are close to ground level) and the aquifer recharges the river through streambed. The transition between dispersing and draining streambed depends on groundwater levels: in the periods characterized by high groundwater levels the inversion of the behaviour of the river shifts towards the north because the phreatic surface intersect the ground level further north. 2. Material and Methods The three-dimensional (3D) flow model of the aquifer system [1] [2] is calibrated through the large number of available observational data, chiefly concerning phreatic and piezometric surfaces, censuses, and evidence gathered from pumping tests. The water balance includes the following components: 1) the net infiltration of the rain, 2) the water discharge dispersed and drained by rivers and 3) by irrigation channels and fields, 4) water discharges from the springs and 5) the water fluxes springing from, or pumped out by, a large number of private and public wells operating in the area. The water flux exchanged between the Brenta river and the underlying aquifer represents an important rate to the recharge of the aquifer system and it is about the 22% of total ingoing water flux (average annual values of about 12 m3/s out of 50 m3/s). The three-dimensional geological model of the system (i.e. its conceptual model), set up by means of extended geological sections and stratigraphies, is used to create the unstructured finite elements grid. Necessary field data concern the local hydraulic conductivity/transmissivity of the aquifers. The steady state calibration is carried out based on real phreatic surface obtained by interpolation of about 100 phreatic observational wells. Estimates of water exchange have been carried out in the past by means of differential discharge measurements along the river (fig. 1). The investigation campaigns of the past have permitted to extract a correlation between the river discharge and water dispersion through the streambed: if the stream flow discharge is of about 10 m3/s the water exchange toward the aquifer is of about 7 m3/s, when water discharge of the river is of about 150 m3/s, the flux ingoing to the aquifer is about 20 m3/s. The draining nature of the lower part of the river (characterized by a water flux from the aquifer to the river) has not been investigated adequately because of the difficulty to conduct differential discharge measurements in the second portion of the river characterized by large and changeable sections, by a great number of gains and losses from surface channels and by the presence of several expansion areas very close to the river and variously interconnected with it. The drained groundwater discharge from the first unconfined aquifer seems to be equal or slightly higher than the water flux from the river to the aquifer of the upper part of the river. So the discharge of the river at the beginning and at the end of the dispersing and draining streambed is approximately equal, taking into account the uncertainty of these measurements. The accuracy of this type of measurements is limited by partially known river diversions and uncertainties in discharge measurements, especially during extreme events. Moreover, they do not give any information on the temporal and spatial variability of the exchange, Using heat as a tracer, the simplest and most available natural tracer along the river channel and its aquifers, allows to investigate the temporal and spatial variability of the water exchange flux. Infact, using heat as a tracer, in conjunction with water-level measurements (within the river and in nearby 201 202 G. Passadore et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 25 (2015) 199 – 205 piezometers) has been shown to be an effective method for estimating groundwater/surface water exchanges [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]. This method requires continuous monitoring in time of the water temperature and the levels of the stream jointly with suitable samples of the temperatures and the piezometric levels of groundwater (if possible, at multiple depths). In particular, in the study area, 5 groundwater monitoring wells (4 on the right bank: Pz1, Pz1-1, Pz12, Pz1-3, 1 on the left bank: Pz2) were drilled along the river banks near a pilot transversal ramp (permeable river barrier) built in order to reduce the downstream flooding risk and to increase the river dispersion; these points have been monitored with automatic head and temperature data loggers since March 2007 (Pz1, Pz2) or since June 2014 (Pz1-1, Pz1-2, Pz1-3). A river stage data logger has also been installed near the permeable check dam in April 2010, in order to obtain hydraulic head and temperature values of the stream (fig. 2). Then a hydrothermal model has been developed in order to optimize the seepage estimation and to simulate the thermal trends observed in monitoring wells. In such manner it has been possible to calculate the flow rate from the river to the aquifer. Fig.2. Monitoring wells, river data logger and S1 ramp. 3. Results Field measurement confirm that groundwater temperature and levels are heavily conditioned by the streambed dispersion, even in furthest monitoring point. For example, well Pz2 is nearer to the streambed and the observed values reveal a direct relation with river leakage. The further well Pz1 starts to show the stream seepage influence only in post-operam condition, after the realization of a ramp, demonstrating a clear variation in the hydrogeological regime. Infact, after the completion of the permeable barrier (which consist of the enlargement of the leakage zone upgradient the ramp) persistent rises of water table (of about 4 meters) have been detected in near monitoring wells (fig. 3). This condition seems to be stable during a long-term monitoring period which G. Passadore et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 25 (2015) 199 – 205 includes all the different phases of the hydrogeological regime. Thermal datasets proved to be useful to validate the artificial groundwater recharge effectiveness (fig. 4). For example, in monitoring well Pz1, that was at first barely influenced by the stream leakage because of the greater distance from Brenta river, a marked head and temperature variation was identified after the realization of ramp S1. The river influence on temperature and hydraulic head of the monitoring well (Pz1 and Pz2) is different in winter or in summer (fig. 5). In winter, a river flood instantaneously raises the hydraulic head of well Pz1 and well Pz2; the water temperature of well Pz2 drops gradually and reaches the minimum value in 8-10 days (events 1 and 2 in fig. 5) due to the arrival of the cold water; the water temperature of well Pz1 does not change due to the great distance from the river (during a flood event). In summer, a river flood instantaneously raises the hydraulic head of wells Pz1 and Pz2 but the impact on temperature is not evident due to the lower temperature of the river water and of the groundwater, similar to the temperature of the flood water (events 3, 4 and 5 in fig. 5). The first model simulations estimate a medium leakage discharge of about 4 m3/s/km. This value is perfectly comparable with the previous field measurements, confirming the numerical tool validity for river seepage evaluation. Fig. 3. Groundwater levels and river head (5 years). 203 204 G. Passadore et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 25 (2015) 199 – 205 Fig. 4. Water temperature of the monitoring well Pz1 and Pz2 and of the river (5 years) Fig. 5. Temperature and hydraulic head of the monitoring well Pz1 and Pz2 and of the river in winter and in summer G. Passadore et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 25 (2015) 199 – 205 References [1] Passadore G (2008) Modello matematico di flusso nei sistemi acquiferi del Veneto Centrale. Ph.D. dissertation, Università di Padova [2] Passadore G, Monego M, Altissimo L, Sottani A, Putti M, Rinaldo A (2012) Alternative conceptual models and the robustness of groundwater management scenarios in the multi-aquifer system of the Central Veneto Basin. Hydrogeology Journal: Volume 20, Issue 3 (2012), 419-433, doi:10.1007/s10040-011-0818-y [3] Anderson MP (2005) Heat as a ground water tracer. Groundwater 43 (6), 951–968, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.00052.x. [4] Constantz J (2008) Heat as a tracer to determine streambed water exchanges, Water Resources Research, 44, W00D10, doi:10.1029/2008WR006996. [5] Duque C, Calvache ML, Engesgaard P (2010) Investigating river–aquifer relations using water temperature in an anthropized environment, (Motril-Salobreña aquifer), Journal of Hydrology 381, 121–133, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.032. [6] Engeler I, Hendricks Franssen HJ, Müller R, Stauffer F (2010) The importance of coupled modelling of variably saturated groundwater flow-heat transport for assessing river–aquifer interactions, Journal of Hydrology 397, 295–305, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.007. [7] Essaid HI, Zamora CM, McCarthy KA, Vogel JR, Wilson JT (2008) Using Heat to Characterize Streambed Water Flux Variability in Four Stream Reaches, J. Environ. Qual. 37:1010–1023, doi:10.2134/jeq2006.0448. [8] Kulongoski JT, Izbicki JA (2008) Simulation of Fluid, Heat Transport to Estimate Desert Stream Infiltration, Groundwater, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00403.x. [9] Rau GC, Andersen MS, McCallum AM, Acworth RI (2010) Analytical methods that use natural heat as a tracer to quantify surface water-groundwater exchange, evaluated using field temperature records. Hydrogeology Journal, Volume 18, pages 1093-1110. [10] USGS (2003) Heat as a tool for studying the movement of groundwater near streams. Circular 1260. U.S. Dep. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. [11] Vettorello L, Berti M, Pedron R, Sottani A (2012) Groundwater field measurements for stream seepage estimation. Flowpath 2012, Bologna (Italy) 205
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz