!"# #$##% & '( ' )*#$ + , +-./+.0 - ,$1 +. - - , , $+ ' ,' $! ,' '' ' $! 2' ' ' , $ ' $+ / 3 0' - $ . 24/, 0 +/$$ ' 0$ - ' $+ 5 '- , $+ - , , $+ ' , , "## "#6$7 , ,$% ,, , , ! +8$+ 9 + - , , ,$+ , $! ' ' -'(- 2'9 $ ....', - $ + - ,':"6 ', /;' <0'/= ' <>*0/?$%$@'<> 0$9 , , #A ...' , ' ' $1 '"# , , $..B', <'"< ?1.<#-, $9 , $. ++':>A ' +C,':":, , 5',?57 ':A*' ,+%'<A$ !"#$% "# 3DD$$ D EF33 3 3>:#*A .9(: <: 6*:6<<6 .9(: <: 6*:6<:> ! '#6: Phylogeny, taxonomy and species delimitation of water mites and velvet mites Jeanette Stålstedt Phylogeny, taxonomy and species delimitation of water mites and velvet mites Jeanette Stålstedt Cover picture: Leptus (Parasitengona, Erythraeoidea) on Öland, Sweden. Photo by Johan Myhrer. ©Jeanette Stålstedt, Stockholm University 2017 ISBN print 978-91-7649-688-6 ISBN PDF 978-91-7649-689-3 Printed in Sweden by US-AB, Stockholm 2017 Distributor: Department of Zoology, Stockholm University Abstract This study is part of the Swedish Taxonomy Initiative (STI) - one of the most ambitious all taxa biodiversity inventories in the world. One of the pillars in STI is to support taxonomic research on the most neglected taxonomic groups with the aim to lift the level of knowledge of biodiversity in the country. There is still a lot to be discovered, especially in the microscopic world, and this includes mites. Many aspects of mite biology and diversity are poorly known, such as species richness, abundance, distribution, lifestyle and behavior of species. Mites inhabit all sorts of aquatic, terrestrial, arboreal and parasitic habitats, nevertheless even in wellstudied systems mites are often overlooked. Despite being among the smallest of arthropods, they are of medical and economical importance and may be very abundant in the ecosystems they inhabit. This thesis focuses on Parasitengona (Acariformes: Prostigmata), one of the most diverse taxa among the arachnids. It includes the aquatic Hydrachnidia (water mites) and the terrestrial Trombidia (e.g. velvet mites, chiggers). A unifying characteristic of Parasitengona is their complex life cycle of active and inactive stages, parasitic larvae and predatory deutonymphs and adults. They typically parasitize and prey on arthropods, except the chiggers which have vertebrates as hosts. The aim of this thesis is to shed light on the phylogeny and taxonomy of Parasitengona with emphasis on the Swedish fauna. To achieve this, mites were collected from different localities throughout the country between the years 2007-2016. Water mites were sampled with a hand net. Larvae of terrestrial Parasitengona were collected with sweeping nets and sorted out from malaise trap samples from the Swedish Malaise Trap Project. To collect the adults Berlese-Tullgren extractor and pitfall traps were used as well as hand collecting and sifting with litter reducer. The material collected abroad was kindly provided through collaboration. Methods used in the papers included morphometrics, multivariate analyses, experimental rearing, DNA extraction and sequencing, Bayesian phylogenetic analyses and molecular species delimitation. In papers I and II, we combine molecular species delimitation models and morphological data to resolve taxonomical issues. This integrative taxonomic approach of combining data resulted in Piona dispersa Sokolow, 1926 as a valid species and redescriptions, new synonyms and neotypes provided for Erythraeus phalangoides (De Geer, 1778), E. cinereus (Dugès, 1834) and E. regalis (C.L. Koch, 1837). Based on the new inventories we produce an updated and annotated checklist of 105 terrestrial Parasitengona species for Fennoscandia in paper III, and use metadata to increase the knowledge on distribution, habitat preferences, life stages and abundance. Out of these, 20 species are new findings for the region and five are potential new species for science. In paper IV, we provide a molecular phylogeny of Parasitengona based on the genes 18S, 28S and COI for 80 taxa with a sampling focus on the terrestrial lineages. Based on the results we offer a revised higher-level classification of the group. In particular the analyses supported Tanaupodoidea Thor, 1935 as a separate superfamily, but Trombiculoidea Ewing, 1929 was not monophyletic and was synonymized, along with Chyzerioidea Womersley, 1954, with Trombidioidea Leach, 1815. In Swedish: Studien ingår i ett av de mest ambitiösa projekten i världen för att kartlägga all biologisk mångfald inom ett område- Svenska artprojektet (STI). En av hörnstenarna i STI är att stödja taxonomisk forskning på dåligt kända organismgrupper med syftet att lyfta kunskapsnivån om biologisk mångfald i landet. Kvalster är en av dessa organismgrupper. De lever i de flesta akvatiska ochterrestra habitat, samt som parasiter, men de förbises ofta även i väl studerade ekosystem. Ett flertal arter är av medicinskt och ekonomiskt intresse och kan utgöra en viktig beståndsdel i de ekosystem de lever. Denna avhandling fokuserar på Parasitengona (Acariformes: Prostigmata) som inkluderar vattenkvalster (Hydrachnidia), sammetskvalster och löpkvalster (Trombidia). Jämförelsevis med övriga kvalster är dessa större i storlek och färgstarka. Därför kallas de ibland för "jättarna" eller "fjärilarna i kvalstervärlden". Parasitengona karakteriseras av deras komplicerade livscykel med alternerande aktiva och inaktiva stadier. Larver är ofta parasitiska medan aktiva nymfer och adulter är glupska rovdjur. De lever på leddjur, förutom "chiggers" som har ryggradsdjur som värd. Målet med avhandlingen var att utforska Parasitengonas fylogeni och taxonomi, med fokus på den svenska faunan. För att uppnå detta insamlades kvalster på olika orter runtom i landet mellan åren 2007-2016. Vattenkvalster insamlades med håv. Larver av terrestra Parasitengona fångades in med slaghåv och sorterades ut från Svenska Malaisefälleprojektets material. De vuxna djuren plockades vid förnasortering eller direkt för hand, men även med hjälp av Berlese-Tullgren trattar och fallfällor. Utländskt material kunde inkluderas tack vare internationellt samarbete. Morfometri, multivariata analyser, uppfödning, sekvensering, släktskapsanalyser och molekylära artavgränsningsmodeller var metoder som användes. I första och andra artikeln, fokuserar vi särskilt på nyttan av att kombinera molekylära artavgränsningsmodeller och morfologiska metoder för att lösa taxonomiska frågor. Denna integrerade metod resulterade i Piona dispersa Sokolow, 1926 som giltig art och ombeskrivningar, nya synonymer och neotyper för Erythraeus. phalangoides (De Geer, 1778), E. cinereus (Dugès, 1834) och E. regalis (C.L. Koch, 1837). I tredje artikeln sammanställer vi en checklista över 105 terrestra Parasitengona arter i Fennoskandien och använder metadata från insamlingsplatser för att öka kunskapen om arters utbredning, habitatpreferenser, livsstadier och förekomst. Av dessa är tjugo arter nya för regionen och fem är potentiellt nya arter för vetenskapen. I fjärde artikeln presenterar vi en molekylär fylogeni över terrestra Parasitengona baserat på generna 18S, 28S och COI för 80 taxa. Baserat på resultatet ger vi en reviderad klassificering för gruppen. Resultaten stödjer Tanaupodoidea Thor, 1935 som överfamilj, men Trombiculoidea Ewing, 1929 var inte monofyletisk och synomiseras, liksom Chyzerioidea Womersley, 1954, med Trombidioidea Leach, 1815. List of papers The thesis is based on the following articles, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals: I Stålstedt, J., Bergsten, J., & Ronquist F. (2013) ”Forms” of water mites (Acari: Hydrachnidiae): intraspecific variation or valid species? Ecology and Evolution, 3(10): 3415–3435. II Stålstedt, J., Wohltmann, A., Bergsten, J., & Mąkol, J. (2016). Towards resolving the double classification in Erythraeus (Actinotrichida: Erythraeidae): matching larvae with adults using 28s sequence data and experimental rearing. Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 16:761–790. III Stålstedt, J., Łaydanowicz, J., Lehtinen, P.T., Bergsten, J. & Mąkol, J. Checklist of Terrestrial Parasitengona mites (Acariformes: Prostigmata) in Fennoscandia – Manuscript intended for Biodiversity Data Journal. IV Stålstedt, J., Mąkol, J. Dabert, M., Wohltmann, A., Dabert, J. & Bergsten, J. Phylogeny and revised classification of terrestrial Parasitengona –Manuscript. Papers I and II are open access articles distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The nomenclatural acts in papers III and IV are not issued for permanent scientific records or for purposes of Zoological Nomenclature and are not regarded as published within the meaning of the International Code of Zoological nomenclature (ICZN, ed. 4, article 8.2). Candidate contributions to thesis articles* I II III IV Conceived the study Substantial Substantial Substantial Substantial Designed the study Substantial Substantial Substantial Significant Collected the data Substantial Significant Significant Substantial Analysed the data Substantial Substantial Substantial Substantial Manuscript preparation Substantial Significant Substantial Significant * Contribution Explanation Minor: contributed in some way, but contribution was limited. Significant: provided a significant contribution to the work. Substantial: took the lead role and performed the majority of the work. Contents Introduction .................................................................................................... 13 Linnaeus’ work continues ......................................................................................... 13 What is a Parasitengona mite? ................................................................................... 14 Evolution of Parasitengona ........................................................................................ 17 Aim of the thesis ...................................................................................................... 18 Material and methods ....................................................................................... 19 Collected material .................................................................................................... 19 Morphometrics ........................................................................................................ 20 Multivariate analyses ................................................................................................ 20 Rearing ................................................................................................................... 20 Gene trees ............................................................................................................... 21 Species delimitation models ...................................................................................... 21 Summary of papers .......................................................................................... 22 Paper I .................................................................................................................... 22 Paper II ................................................................................................................... 23 Paper III .................................................................................................................. 24 Paper IV.................................................................................................................. 24 Discussion ...................................................................................................... 25 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................... 27 References ...................................................................................................... 29 Introduction Linnaeus’ work continues Acarology probably started 35 BC with Aristotle, who named the tiny animal akari and which Linnaeus in 1758 latinized to Acarus. It wasn’t until the late 1800s that the term “acarologist” arose to describe those who study mites and in the middle of the 1900s the word started to appear in dictionaries (Krantz 1996). In Linnaeus’s Systema Naturae 31 species were included (Linnaeus 1758). This inspired a large number of biologists to start something amazing, namely the discovery of biodiversity in poorly known groups. Early works of acarology were performed by Koch, Dugés, Berlese, Kramer, Grandjean, to name only a few. Today, approximately 55,000 species are described (Zhang et al. 2011; Walter & Proctor 2013). However, this probably represents only 5% of the real fauna. Although not equal to insects, mites do rank high in species richness (Walter & Proctor 2013).The biodiversity and biology of mites, in aspect of species richness, abundance, lifestyle and behavior of the species, are poorly known in general. Mites inhabits all sorts of aquatic, terrestrial, arboreal and parasitic habitats, nevertheless even in well-studied systems mites are often overlooked. Despite being among the smallest of arthropods, they are highly active in the ecosystem as parasites on animals and plants, detritivores, predators or a combination of several feeding behaviors (Walter & Proctor 2013). They can be adaptable in bodysize which can result in successful exploitation of microhabitats. This also demands microscope equipment, which is essential for identification. The range of size is relatively wide when comparing the largest and smallest of mites. Giant red velvet mites can become almost 2 cm in length, while gall mites can be as short as 80 μm (Lindquist et al. 1996). Linnaeus’ vision of mapping all life has so far not been achieved, not even in his home country of Sweden. Today, a large scale project called the Swedish Taxonomy Initiative, financed by the Swedish government, is continuing his work. The goal is to identify all species of multicellular plants, fungi and animals in the country. There is still a lot to be discovered, especially in the microscopic world. Naturally, this includes mites. In Sweden we have over 1,000 species of Acari known (Gärdenfors et al. 2003). Most of these are represented in the collections at the Zoology Museum in Lund and the Swedish Museum of Natural History in Stockholm. Moss mites (Oridatida) 13 and water mites (aquatic Parasitengona , Hydrachnidia) have been studied the most. After Linnaeus and De Geers work, Carl Herman W. Andersén (1863) raises the knowledge from 21 to 137 Swedish species (Bock 2017). Ivar Trägårdh, Karl-Herman Forsslund, Per Dalenius and Nils TarrasWahlberg have published papers with emphasis on moss mites, and moss mites in forest ecosystem have been studied by the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Uppsala (Lundqvist 1987). One of the first papers on Swedish water mite fauna was published by Carl Julius Neuman with 72 species recognized (Neuman 1880). In 1927, 1962 and 1968, Olov Lundblad published his major findings in “Die Hydracarinen Schwedens”, in three parts. For each of the 235 species recognized with detailed location data, he produced a series of perfect slide preparations. However, a number of morphological variants called “forms” were a taxonomical challenge. Did these morphotypes represent intra- or interspecific variation? Morphological and genetic data imply that the forms are separate species and therefore the majority of them are considered valid in Fauna Europaea (Davids & Kouwets 1987; Gerecke 2014; Stålstedt et al. 2013). Today, 252 Swedish species are recorded (Lundblad 1962; Böttger & Ullrich 1974; Nordqvist & Herrmann 2008; Dyntaxa 2013; Stålstedt et al. 2013; Stålstedt unpublished). In contrast, the Swedish fauna of terrestrial Parasitengona (Trombidia) was very poorly known. Gärdenfors et al. (2003) listed 12 species. With literature and collections thoroughly searched and recent findings added (Haitlinger 2008), we summarized it to about 30 species at the start of this project with the help of Lars Lundqvist (Zoology Museum in Lund). To date, 47 Swedish species are known (Stålstedt et al. unpublished; paper III). Species were mostly described based on adults in the early years, but have more commonly been described as larvae in the last decades (Wohltmann 2000; Zhang & Fan 2007). Because of the difficulty of matching the heteromorphic larval and post-larval stages, this has created a problem with “double classification”. This means that the actual number of species in Europe may be anywhere between 300 and 500 out of the 680 nominal species of terrestrial Parasitengona (Mąkol & Wohltmann 2012, 2013; paper II). What is a Parasitengona mite? Parasitengona is made up of two ecologically distinct assemblages, the aquatic Hydrachnidia and the terrestrial Trombidia. Relative to the remaining mites, these are larger in size and more colorful. Therefore they are sometimes called “the giants” or “the butterflies of the Acari world”. The most striking appearance is the intensely red color, but they can also be purple, orange, yellow, blue, green and brown. The terrestrial Trombidia and in particular its superfamily Trombidioidea are called “velvet mites”. This is 14 due to the red color and “furry” appearance by numerous setae, of its most famous family Trombidiidae (Proctor 1998). This family is sometimes called “true velvet mites” or “red velvet mites”. “Chiggers” or “scrub itch mites” (Trombiculidae) parasitize on vertebrate hosts and can act as vector for several diseases (paper IV). “Water mites” (Hydrachnidia) have also been referred as Hydrachnidiae, Hydrachnida, Hydracarina or Hydrachnellae, while the two latter names are no longer used. In the past, limnic species of Halacaridae (Prostigmata) were wrongly included (Di Sabatino et al. 2000). The Parasitengona (Acariformes: Prostigmata) constitute one of the most diverse taxa among the arachnids. There are over 11,000 known species of Parasitengona (Walter & Proctor 2013). This number is considered a great underestimate of the true species diversity, since Africa, Asia, and South America have been poorly studied to date (Smith & Cook 1991; Di Sabatino et al. 2000). It is estimated that water mites alone would reasonably be more than 10,000 species (Di Sabatino et al. 2008). By recent classifications, they are grouped into either fourteen (Krantz & Walter 2009), seventeen (Zhang et al. 2011) or eleven superfamilies (Davids et al. 2007; Mąkol & Wohltmann 2012, 2013). The lack of consensus mostly affects the composition of Trombidioidea and it is mainly due to the fact that no well supported phylogeny of terrestrial Parasitengona exists. A unifying characteristic of Parasitengona is their complex life cycle consisting of a parasitic larva, two inactive pupa-like calyptostatic stages that represent the protonymph and tritonymph, and active predatory deutonymphal and adult stages. The larvae usually parasitize on arthropods while the active postlarval stages (deutonymph and adult) are predators. The deutonymph is similar to the adult, but adults have a genital opening for reproduction and they are often more developed in size and other characters. In contrast to being the most common host for water mites, Chironomidae is rarely parasitized by terrestrial larvae. But Tipulidae represents a group used as host for both Trombidia and Hydrachnidia. Terrestrial Parasitengona prey mostly on insect eggs and larvae, but species predation on insect imagines and mites have been observed (Wohltmann et al. 2007). Water mites contribute in regulating mosquito populations, especially in habitats were fish is absent (Di Sabatino et al. 2000; Davids et al. 2007). However, small crustaceans are also an important food source for water mites (Proctor & Pritchard 1989). They have been proposed as suitable bioindicators due to their dependence on host and prey, sensitivity to altered sediment structure and poor water quality influenced by organic waste, heavy metals or other poisonous compounds (Goldschmidt 2016). Trombidioidea are abundant both in woodland areas and in open habitats (Wohltmann 2000). They often burrow themselves and some only emerge to 15 the soil surface for mating. They can be found in soil, humus, moss, litter or sand, ranging from xeric to hygric habitats (Zhang 1998). Major taxonomic and phylogenetic revisions are needed in nearly all taxa (Zhang 1998; Wohltmann 2000). Nevertheless, some groups have been treated in the relatively recent literature. Revision has been made by Southcott on Trombidiidae (1986), Johnstonianidae (1987), Eutrombidiidae (1993) and Microtrombidiidae (1994). A revision of postlarval Microtrombidiidae was published by Gabryś (1996; 1999). Mąkol (2007) revised Trombidiidae and Podothrombiidae, and Wohltmann et al. (2004) revised European Johnstonianidae. In contrast to Trombidioidea, Erythraeoidea contains many fast-moving and long-legged species. They are mostly found in open and dry landscapes but some species occur in hygric habitats and its calyptostatic stages can survive flooding. They live in or on the litter layer, but can also be found hiding under bark of trees and under rocks. Larvae can attach to hosts, even fast moving ones, with the help of a sticky secretion. Balaustium von Heyden, 1826 and some Abrolophus Berlese, 1891 species have predatory larvae (Wohltmann et al. 2007). Calyptostomatoidea and Tanaupodoidea contain solely one single family each. Tanaupodoidea occur in moist litter and Calyptostomatoidea mostly in wet or moist litter and moss habitats (Krantz & Walter 2009). In Europe, Calyptostomatoidea is represented by a single species, Calyptostoma velutinus (Müller, 1776). However, it is suggested that this taxon represent more than one species (Wohltmann et al. 1999; paper III). Water mites are often classified into eight superfamilies. They live in lakes, temporary waters, streams and springs. The calyptostatic stages give an advantage in avoiding drought and the larval parasitism opens up for rapid and long-distance dispersal on flying insects (Di Sabatino et al. 2002). The Hydryphantoidea, Eylaoidea and Hydrachnoidea are mostly red and relatively large sized, while Lebertioidea, Hygrobatoidea, Arrenuroidea often have a combination of green, brown, yellow, red and blue coloration (Di Sabatino et al. 2002; Krantz & Walter 2009; Di Sabatino et al. 2010). Body-shapes are also highly variable. For instance, Oxidae within Lebertioidea are flattened laterally. Hydrovolzioidea, composed of two small families, have highly distinctive, sclerotized and dorso-ventrally flattened bodies and some morphological similarity to Halacaroidea (Prostigmata) (Di Sabatino et al. 2010). Stygothrombioidea with its single genus have elongated (worm-like) bodies and seems to occur interstitially burrowed in the bottom sediment in lotic habitats (Krantz & Walter 2009). Arrenuroidea are mostly sclerotized mites and consists of twenty families, and the genus Arrenurus Duges, 1834 is known to prefer Odonata as host (Krantz & Walter 2009; Zhang et al. 2011). Adults of a few species of Hygrobatoidea live in the mantle cavity of molluscs or in the canal system of sponges. 16 Evolution of Parasitengona Although the relation among the arachnid lineages is uncertain, molecular phylogenies indicate that Acari is paraphyletic, comprising the two superorders Acariformes and Parasitiformes. Parasitengona belong to the very diverse order of Trombidiformes within Acariformes. The phylogenetic relationships within Parasitengona are uncertain. It seems that water mites is not a sister group but nested within the terrestrial Trombidia but with an uncertain placement (Welbourn 1991; Dabert et al. 2010, 2016; paper IV) (Fig. 1). The molecular data suggest Stygothrombioidea or Calyptostomatoidea as the closest relative of water mites (Dabert et al. 2016). Although originally considered a polyphyletic assemblage of waterliving forms, the consensus now is that Hydrachnidia forms a monophyletic group at least without Stygothrombioidea (Dabert et al. 2016). Keeping the superfamily Hydrovolzioidea within Hydrachnidia, was confirmed with the help of scanning electron microscope and molecular data (Alberti & Bader 1990; Dabert et al. 2016). The Stygothrombioidea however, is harder to place. It is unclear if Stygothrombioidea represenst an independent invasion of freshwater or if they belong to the water mites as a superfamily within Hydrachnidia (Wohltmann et al. 2007; Krantz & Walter 2009; Walter & Proctor 2013; Dabert et al. 2016). They have the two defining characters of water mites (two setae on larval palpal genu and presence of glandularia) that are lacking in terrestrial Parasitengona. However, they also have trichobothria and well-developed empodial claw in the adult, which is absent in Hydrachnidia (Walter & Proctor 2013). A Erythraeoidea Calyptostomatoidea Hydrachnidia (Water mites) Stygothrombioidea Hydrachnidia (Water mites) Calyptostomatoidea Tanaupodoidea Erythraeoidea Chyzerioidea Trombiculoidea Trombiculoidea Chyzerioidea Trombidioidea Trombidioidea Parasitengona ? B Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationship among major lineages of Parasitengona based on (A) the morphological data by Welbourn (1991) and (B) the molecular data by Dabert et al. (2016). 17 Aim of the thesis The aim of this thesis is to shed light on the phylogeny and taxonomy of Parasitengona with emphasis on the Swedish fauna. To achieve this, I specifially focused on: ¾ The utility of combining molecular species delimitation models and morphological methods to resolve taxonomical issues, such as the status of morphological forms (paper I) and matching heteromorphic larvae with adults (paper II). ¾ Identifying the fauna of terrestrial Parasitengona in Fennoscandia by new collecting efforts and using metadata from inventories to give additional insight into the habitat preferences, phenology of life stages, distribution and abundance of species (paper III). ¾ Reconstruct a molecular phylogeny of Parasitengona based on multiple genes and a taxon-sampling focus on the terrestrial lineages, and from this produce a revised higher-level classification (paper IV). 18 Material and methods Collected material Inventory in Sweden, was done between the years 2007-2016 on different localities throughout the country. The largest sampling effort was conducted in 2008 and 2013. Water mites were sampled with a hand net (mesh size 0.5 mm) and the living material was sorted in the laboratory or directly in the field. In paper I, running and standing water in the provinces of Uppland and Småland in Sweden were chosen on the basis of earlier findings of Lundblad (1962; 1968). Most of the larval material of terrestrial mites was kindly provided by the Swedish Malaise Trap Project (SMTP) (paper II, III and paper IV). SMTP is a remarkable three-year inventory (2003-2006) of the Swedish insect fauna using over 70 Malaise traps placed around the country and maintained by volunteers (Karlsson et al. 2005). The sorting of Acari (without or with hosts) was done by SMTP at Station Linné on Öland and further sorting of Prostigmata and Parasitengona was done at the Swedish Museum of Natural History. The adults were collected by sifting (litter reducer) or hand picking in the field. Hand net (larvae), BerleseTullgren apparatus and pitfall traps were also used. Localities for collecting terrestrial adults were selected based on relative quantities of larvae (parasiting on winged insects) sorted from different SMTP-traps (paper II, III and paper IV). In many cases, the adults were found active in the litter surface and close to water habitats. In June 2013, I had help with the collecting from Rasmus Hovmöller (Swedish Museum of Natural History) who was at that time field assistant in the project and Magdalena Felska (Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences), who at that time was a PhD student in Poland. Better understanding about collection methods and habitat preferences were kindly taught in the field by her. All Swedish material studied for this thesis is either stored in ethanol (80%, -20°C) or mounted on slides (euparal mounting media). Swedish material and DNA extractions are deposited at the Swedish Museum of Natural History (NHRS). In paper III, species occurrence records of terrestrial mites in Fennoscandia are documented by georeferenced locality data and additional metadata. Data from Norway and Finland was provided by Joanna Mąkol, Joanna Łaydanowicz and Pekka T. Lehtinen. Mites collected abroad for DNA extraction in paper IV was loaned to me by Joanna Mąkol, Andreas Wohltmann, Cal Welbourn and Hans Klompen. Additional specimens were 19 provided by Johannes Bergsten. Sequences were provided by J. Dabert, M. Dabert and Genbank. The remaining material was collected in Sweden. Morphometrics Measurements were taken with a Leitz Wetzlar Laborlux S microscope (paper I) and Nikon Eclipse 80i (paper II, III, IV). Aquatic Parasitengona were identified with the help of Viets (1936), Lundblad (1962; 1968) Davids et al. (2007) and Di Sabatino et al. (2010), while terrestrial Parasitengona were identified using Haitlinger (1987; 2003) and Wohltmann et al. (2007). Identification in paper II of Erythraeus species was challenging and needed comparisons with a reference collection of Palearctic species (coll. Joanna Mąkol, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Poland). Important morphological characters in Piona and Unionicola are palps, genital acetabula and, if present, claw of the males’ third leg.In Erythraeus palpal conalae, setae (body and legs, often modified) and crista metopica are the most important characters. Qualitative characters are of special importance (e.g. shape), while in Erythraeus larvae quantitative measurements are also required. All measurements are taken with an ocular micrometer. The total length of legs includes coxae. Terminology, abbreviations applied to morphological structures, and measurement standards follow Wohltmann et al. (2007) and Mąkol (2010). Multivariate analyses Characters of males and females for each genus were analyzed separately in a principal component analyses performed in R version 2.8.1 (R Development Core Team 2008). Measurements were taken of the width and length of the body, fourth coxa (in Unionicola specimens the fused coxa III and IV), palpal femur (P-II), and palpal tibia (P-IV).We also measured the dorsal length of the remaining segments of the palp. In addition, we counted the sclerotized and unsclerotized genital acetabula of females, and measured the width and length of the tarsus and claw of the males’ third leg. Rearing Experimental rearing was performed by Andreas Wohltmann and Joanna Mąkol. Larvae were obtained from field-collected females. The diapausing life stage of each particular species was recognized. The material was kept at controlled temperature (20 °C, ±1 °C tolerance) and light (12 h dark, 12 h light) in environmental chambers. In case of successful development of eggs into larvae, the recorded rearing success was >90 %. When development stopped at a certain instar, specimens were exposed to 5 °C for about 90 days and subsequently re-exposed to 20 °C in order to imitate winter conditions 20 and to break diapause. Test on the influence of humidity followed procedures described in Wohltmann (1998). Host and food were offered. Gene trees The molecular work was carried out at the Molecular Systematics Laboratory (MSL), Swedish Museum of Natural History. DNA was extracted from the tissue of four legs of each individual or the whole mite, depending on size. For the molecular analyses, DNA was extracted and sequenced using standard protocols. Three genes were used, one mitochondrial (COI) and two nuclear genes (18S and 28S). DNA sequences were aligned using MAFFT or ClustalW (Katoh et al. 2005; Larkin et al. 2007). The third codon position of COI and some of the highly variable and poorly aligned regions of 18S and 28S were excluded for the higher-level phylogeny. Regions were identified using Gblocks v.0.91b (Castresana 2000). Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed with Bayesian methods, using MrBayes (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003; Ronquist et al. 2012) and BEAST (Bouckaert et al. 2014). Nucleotide composition statistics, genetic intra- and interspecific distances (Kimura 1980), and parsimony informative characters were obtained using MEGA (Tamura et al. 2013). Species delimitation models Molecular species delimitation was conducted using the generalized mixed Yule-coalescent model (GMYC) in paper I and paper II (Pons et al. 2006; Fujisawa & Barraclough 2013), Rosenberg’s (2007) test of reciprocal monophyly and Rodrigo et al.’s (2008) test of branch length ratios. These are all tested with single-locus gene trees. The GMYC analysis was performed in R with the “splits” package (Ezard et al. 2014; R Core Team 2015). 21 Summary of papers Paper I Stålstedt, J., Bergsten, J., & Ronquist F. (2013) ”Forms” of water mites (Acari: Hydrachnidiae): intraspecific variation or valid species? Ecology and Evolution, 3(10): 3415–3435. In many groups of organisms, especially in the older literature, it has been common practice to recognize sympatrically occurring phenotypic variants of a species as "forms". In this study, we test a number of what is now recognized as valid species of water mites, but which have in the past been treated as forms. A form currently not recognized as a valid species, was also tested. The molecular species delimitation models, mitochondrial COI, nuclear 28S and quantitative analyses of morphological data supported that all forms are separately evolving lineages. The genetic distance between the form Piona dispersa Sokolow, 1926 and the nominate species Piona variabilis (Koch, 1836) was 11%. We propose that P. dispersa are recognized as a valid taxon at the species level. The DNA data also revealed that some taxa likely represent more than one species. Female of Unionicola minor (Soar, 1900). 22 Paper III Stålstedt, J., Łaydanowicz, J., Lehtinen, P.T., Bergsten, J. & Mąkol, J. Checklist of Terrestrial Parasitengona mites (Acariformes: Prostigmata) in Fennoscandia – Manuscript intended for Biodiversity Data Journal. The knowledge of terrestrial Parasitengona in Fennoscandia lags far behind that of the aquatic counterpart, the water mites (Hydrachnidia). Based on new inventories we provide primary data and an annotated checklist of terrestrial Parasitengona in Fennoscandia including 110 species. Out of these, 20 species are new findings for the region and five are potential new species for science. 19 species were new for Norway, 15 for Finland and 8 for Sweden. The known recorded fauna today of terrestrial Parasitengona is 73 species for Norway, 47 for Sweden and 47 for Finland. Primary data include georeferenced locality data as well as collecting techniques and microhabitat to increase the knowledge on species’ habitat requirements. The higher recorded diversity for Norway is likely the result of a relatively larger effort. Paper IV Stålstedt, J., Mąkol, J., Dabert, M., Wohltmann, A., Dabert, J. & Bergsten, J. Phylogeny and revised classification of terrestrial Parasitengona – Manuscript. The phylogenetic relationship between Hydrachnidia and Trombidia has been debated and the molecular phylogeny of Hydrachnidia was recently tested. Here we provide and analyze the most comprehensive molecular dataset of terrestrial Parasitengones to date based on the genes 18S, 28S and COI for 80 taxa. Hydrachnidia is nested within Trombidia and sister group to Calyptostomatoidea. Stygothrombioidea is sister to remaining Parasitengona, Erythraeoidea and Tanaupodoidea are sister taxa and Trombiculoidea is a paraphyletic clade along with Chyzerioidea in relation to Trombidioidea. Based on the result we recognize five non-Hydrachnidia superfamilies: Stygothrombioidea Thor, 1935, Tanaupodoidea Thor, 1935, Calyptostomatoidea Oudemans, 1923, Erythraeoidea Robineau-Desvoidy, 1828 and Trombidioidea Leach, 1815 (=Trombiculoidea Ewing, 1929 (n. syn.); =Chyzerioidea Womersley, 1954 (n. syn.); =Yurebilloidea Southcott, 1996) (n. syn.)). We also suggest Podothrombiidae Thor, 1935 to be valid at family level (n. stat.). 24 Discussion The limit of a species is not always easy to determine and depends on the species concept used. In papers I and II we use the unified species concept (DeQuieroz, 2007). In the case of Unionicola crassipes – U. minor complex (Hygrobatoidea) we concluded that until further data becomes available, U. minor should not to be delimited into four separated species as showed by the molecular analyses. De Quieroz (2007) suggested that preferably multiple lines of evidence should be available to support that two taxa are separately evolving. The multivariate analysis did not find a character supporting this and we were not able to reject that the variation in palp shape was continuous. Unionicola crassipes and U. minor on the other hand have relatively discrete morphological characters, different behavior and molecular support and can by the unified species concept be considered separate species. In paper I and II we used molecular species delimitation models together with morphological evidence to solve taxonomical questions and state the importance of combining molecular and morphological methods. The experimental rearing did not only support the molecular delimitation but additionally gave more biological data on the life stages which could not be obtained solely by molecular data. In addition to the three Erythraeus species in paper II, material is already available for four new redescriptions of Erythraeus spp. To date, 299 Swedish species of Parasitengona are known (Stålstedt unpublished; paper III). In comparison to water mites in neighboring countries, 158 species in Norway (Mehl 1979; Stålstedt unpublished) and 139 in Finland (Bagge & Bagge 2009), Sweden is well studied with its 252 species. Despite this, there are still areas of biological interest in Sweden that have not been surveyed. The fauna of the remaining Nordic countries is yet to be well explored even if Finland and Norway is not expected to be as diverse as Sweden. Regarding the terrestrial Parasitengona, a Norwegian inventory was conducted by Joanna Łaydanowicz, a former PhD student at Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences in Poland. Despite limited in geographic area, the sampling was thorough in terms of microhabitats. With Norway’s 73 species and northern localities still to be explored the actual number of species can be higher (paper III). In Finland, the collection area was even more limited to the southern parts. The 25 sampling effort made in Sweden was quite comprehensive and resulted in sorted material which is still being processed. The phylogeny in paper IV while being the most comprehensive to date, shows the need for additional genes and taxa for a better resolution in future analyses. Especially the lacking families Walchiidae, Leeuwenhoekiidae, Neotrombidiidae, Audyanidae, Yurebillidae, Achaemenothrombiidae, Amphotrombiidae and Allotanaupodidae should be included in the future. Additional representatives of Tanaupodidae, Trombellidae, Chyzeriidae and Neothrombiidae are also needed. Geographically, the Asian and Africa continent was poorly represented in this study. At the same time, it is clear that to resolve the backbone of Parasitengona the three genes 18S, 28S and COI is not enough, and future studies should aim for more nuclear genes. It has been fifteen years since the Swedish Taxonomy Initiative (STI) was established and more than 3,000 species have been discovered as new for the Swedish flora and fauna since then. From this thesis ten more species can be added to that list, plus two potential new species for science. For sure there are more to be found in the diverse group of mites. In Parasitengona mites alone, it is reasonable to assume that the Swedish fauna is at least as diverse as what is now known from Norway which would mean more than twenty species remain to be discovered. In addition, fourteen taxa have been raised to species level since Lundblad’s (1968) studies and about twenty records rediscovered in the literature since Gärdenfors et al. (2003). However, old literature records can also be based on misidentifications or in some cases be from habitats that no longer exist where they used to. Therefore it is necessary that the findings can be confirmed with recent studies. Molecular data open up possibilities for new research and surely mite systematics will gain from this. I hope this thesis is a step on the way towards an improved classification of Parasitengona and charting of its biodiversity. Hopefully this thesis contributes to the knowledge of this poorly known organismgroup, in line with STI’s and Linnaeus’ vision on naming and knowing the biodiversity in Sweden and globally. 26 Acknowledgements This PhD study is financed by the Swedish Taxonomy Initiative (The Swedish Species Information Centre) and I am very grateful for the support. Stipendia was given by Riksmusei Vänner and Entomologiska Föreningen i Stockholm for traveling to Japan and Poland. I also appreciate the financial support by Biofokus (Oslo, Norway) and Artningshjälpen (Vindeln, Sweden) for identification of water mites. I am very grateful for my supervisors’ hard work. Thank you Johannes Bergsten for being a great supervisor and teaching me molecular delimitation models, recent systematic strategies in arthropods through the journal club sessions and the importance of the written word to make your research available to science, not only for those working on the taxonomic group but for all interested in systematics. Joanna Mąkol, I am very impressed by your knowledge and research with terrestrial Parasitengona. I would like to thank you for teaching me the identification, terminology, morphological structures of setae and literature. I also appreciate our field trip with your students, in the mountains near the border of Czech Republic. I also want to thank Fredrik Ronquist for his initiative, supervision on the water mite study and teaching me the basis of molecular phylogeny and MrBayes. I want to express my gratitude to my coauthor and independent researcher Andreas Wohltmann who greatly improved the study of Erythraeus with his fantastic work on experimental rearing and his contribution on the phylogeny of terrestrial Parasitengona. I would also like to acknowledge my coauthors Mirka Dabert and Jacek Dabert for kindly collaborating with us and improving the phylogenetic study. Additional thanks goes to coauthors Joanna Łaydanowicz and Pekka T. Lehtinen who provided extensive locality data for the checklist. Thank you Magdalena Felska (Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Poland) for visiting me two weeks in the field, making the terrestrial collecting effort a success. Thanks goes to Rasmus Hovmöller (NRM) for working as an assistant for four weeks in the field and collecting mites from Abisko and Vindelfjällen in the north of Sweden. 27 I am also grateful for the material and support given by the staff at the Swedish Museum of Natural History (NRM). The research and care of the collections at the Department of Zoology are of great inspiration. I would like to thank all my colleagues and the head of the department Kjell Arne Johanson. The staff of the Molecular Systematics Laboratory (MSL, NRM) is acknowledged for their valuable advice on sequencing, especially the help from Bodil Cronholm, Martin Irestedt and Keyvan Mirbakhsh. I appreciate Rasa Bukontaite, Marianne Espeland, Sibylle Häggqvist, Tobias Malm, Julia Stigenberg, Jonas Strandberg and Emma Wahlberg who were at the time PhD students at NRM, for their advice on molecular and morphological analysis. Extra support was given by Rasa and Jonas. You encourage me to make my best – Thank you! I would also like to take this opportunity to give my appreciation to Ulf Lettevall (Växjö) for teaching me water mites when I was Jan Herrmann’s student at Kalmar University. Thanks are also given to Lars Lundqvist (Zoology Museum, Lund) and the teachers at the Acarology Summer Program (Ohio, USA) for teaching me the basics of acarology. Special thanks to my husband Alexander Stålstedt, for combining mite sampling with family trips, as well as rereading manuscripts. You are a great chauffeur! Thanks also goes to my kids, who never complain and enjoy following me around Sweden. Collecting mites in the Swedish mountains. Photo by Alexander Stålstedt. 28 References Alberti G. and Bader C. (1990) Fine structure of external ‘genital’ papillae in the freshwater mite Hydrovolzia placophora (Hydrovolziidae, Actinedida, Actinotrichida, Acari). Experimental & Applied Acarology, 8, 115–124. Andersén C.H. (1863). Bidrag till kännedomen om Nordiska Acarider. Öfversigt af Kongliga Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar, 20, 181-193. Bagge A.M. and Bagge P. (2009) Finnish water mites (Acari: Hydrachnidia, Halacaroidea). Memoranda Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica, 85, 69-78. Bouckaert R., Heled J., Kühnert D., Vaughan T.G., Wu C-H., Xie D., Suchard M.A., Rambaut A. and Drummond A.J. (2014) "BEAST2: A software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis". PLOS Computational Biology, 10, 4, e1003537. Böttger K. and Ullrich F. (1974) Wassermilben (Hydrachnellae, Acari) der Eider, Faunistische und biologisch-ökologische Angaben. Faunistisch-ökologische Mitteilungen, 4, 419–436. Castresana J. (2000) Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 17, 540– 552. Dabert M., Witalinski W., Kazmierski A., Olszanowski Z. and Dabert J. (2010) Molecular phylogeny of acariform mites (Acari, Arachnida): strong conflict between phylogenetic signal and long-branch attraction artifacts. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 56, 1, 222–241. Dabert M. Proctor H. and Dabert J. (2016) Higher-level molecular phylogeny of the water mites (Acariformes: Prostigmata: Parasitengonina: Hydrachnidiae). Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 101, 75–90. Davids C. and Kouwets F.A.C. (1987) The characteristics of some water mite species of the genus Piona (Acari, Hydrachnellae) with three new larval descriptions. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 110, 1, 1–18. Davids C., Di Sabatino A., Gerecke R., Gledhill T., Smit H. and van der Hammen H. (2007) Acari: Hydrachnidia. In: Gerecke R. (ed.): Süßwasserfauna Mitteleuropas, 7/2-1, Chelicerata, Araneae, Acari I: 241–376. Spektrum Elsevier, München. de Queiroz, K. (2007). Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology, 56, 879–886. Di Sabatino A., Gerecke R. and Martin P. (2000) The biology and ecology of lotic water mites (Hydrachnidia). Freshwater Biology, 44, 47–62. Di Sabatino A., Martin P., Gerecke R. and Cicolani B. (2002) Hydrachnidia (Water Mites). In: Rundle S.D., Robertson A.L. and Schmid-Araya J.M. (eds) Freshwater Meiofauna: Biology and ecology. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 105–133. Di Sabatino A., Smit H., Gerecke R., Goldschmidt T., Matsumoto N. and Cicolani B. (2008) Global diversity of water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia; Arachnida) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia, 595, 303–315. 29 Di Sabatino A., Gerecke R., Gledhill T. and Smit H. (2010) Acari: Hydrachnidia II. In: Gerecke R. (ed.): Süßwasserfauna Mitteleuropas, 7/2-2, Chelicerata, Acari II: 1–234. Spektrum Elsevier, Heidelberg. Dyntaxa (2013) Svensk taxonomisk databas. http://www.dyntaxa.se/taxon/info/2001848, 2014-08-29. Ezard T., Fujisawa T. and Barraclough T.G. (2014) SPLITS: species’ limits by threshold statistics. (Available from: https://r-forge.rproject.org/projects/splits/). Fujisawa T. and Barraclough T. (2013) Delimiting Species Using Single-locus Data and the Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent (GMYC) Approach: A Revised Method and Evaluation on Simulated Datasets. Systematic Biology, 0, 1–18. Gabryś G. (1996) Microtrombidiidae (Acari: Actinedida) of Poland. Annals of the Upper Silesian Museum, 6–7, 145–242. Gabryś G. (1999) The world genera of Microtrombidiidae (Acari, Actinedida, Trombidioidea). Monographs of the Upper Silesian Museum, 2, 1–361. Gerecke R. (2014) Fauna Europaea. In: Magowski W. (eds) (2014) Fauna Europaea: Acari. Fauna Europaea version 1.0. Available from: http://www.faunaeur.org/, 2014-08-29. Goldschmidt T. 2016. Water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia): powerful but widely neglected bioindicators–a review. Neotropical Biodiversity, 2(1): 12–25. Gärdenfors U., Hall R., Hallingbäck T., Hansson H.G. and Hedström L. (2003) Djur, svampar och växter i Sverige 2003: förteckning över antal arter per familj. – ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala. Haitlinger R. (1987) The genus Erythraeus Latreille, 1806 (Acari, Prostigmata, Erythraeidae) in Poland (larvae). Bulletin Entomologique de Pologne, 57, 725– 734. Haitlinger R. (2003) Four new larval Erythraeidae (Acari, Prostigmata) from Rhodes, Greece. Biologia, 58, 133–146. Haitlinger R. (2008) New records of mites (Acari: Prostigmata: Erythraeidae, Johnstonianidae, Trombidiidae) from West and North Europe, with the description of Abrolphus nymindegabicus sp.n. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego we Wrocławiu, Biologia i Hodowla Zwierząt 56, 566: 51–64. Karlsson D., Pape T., Johanson K. A., Liljeblad J. and Ronquist F. (2005) Svenska Malaisefälle- projektet, eller hur många arter steklar, flugor och myggor finns i Sverige? [The Swedish Malaise Trap Project, or how many species of Hymenoptera and Diptera are there in Sweden?]. Entomologisk Tidskrift, 126, 1–2, 43–53. Katoh K., Kuma K., Toh H. and Miyata T. (2005) MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res, 33, 511–518. Kimura M. (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotides sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16, 111–120. Krantz G.W. (1996) Specialization and systematics in acarology: reflections and predictions. pp. 1–4. In: Mitchell R., Horn D.J., Needham G.R. and Welbourn W.C. (eds.): Acarology IX: Vol 1, Proceedings. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, Ohio. Krantz G.W. and Walter D.E. (eds.) (2009) A Manual of Acarology. Third Edition. – Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, Texas, 807 pp. Lindquist E.E., Bruin J., Sabelis M.W. 1996. Eriophyoid mites: their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Linnaeus C. (1758) Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae secundum classes, ordines, genera, species cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. 10 th ed., v.1, Laurentius Salvius, Holmia, 824 pp. 30 Lundblad O. (1927) Die Hydracarinen Schwedens I. Beitrag zur Systematik, Embryologie, Ökologie und Verbreitungsgeschichte der schwedischen Arten. Zoologiska Bidrag från Uppsala, Almqvist & Wiksell, 11, 4, 185–540. Lundblad O. (1962) Die Hydracarinen Schwedens II. Arkiv för Zoologi, band 14, – Kungl. Svenska Vetenskapsakademien, Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm, Göteborg, Uppsala, 635 pp. Lundblad O. (1968) Die Hydracarinen Schwedens III. Arkiv för Zoologi, band 21, – Kungl. Svenska Vetenskapsakademien, Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm. Lundqvist L. (1987) Bibliografi och checklist över Sveriges oribatider (Acari: Oribatei).[Checklist of Swedish oribatids (Acari: Oribatei), 1941–1985.]. Enomologiskt Tidskrift, 108, 3–12. Larkin M.A., Blackshields G., Brown N.P., Chenna R., McGettigan P.A., McWilliam H., Valentin F., Wallace I.M., Wilm A., Lopez R., Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J. and Higgins D.G. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics, 23, 2947–2948. Mąkol J. (2007) Generic level review and phylogeny of Trombidiidae and Podothrombiidae (Acari: Actinotrichida: Trombidioidea) of the World. Annales Zoologici, 57, 1, 1–194. Mąkol J. (2010) A redescription of Balaustium murorum (Hermann, 1804) (Acari: Prostigmata: Erythraeidae) with notes on related taxa. Annales Zoologici, 60, 439–454. Mąkol J. and Wohltmann A. (2012) An annotated checklist of terrestrial Parasitengona (Actinotrichida: Prostigmata) of the world, excluding Trombiculidae and Walchiidae. Annales Zoologici, Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 62, 3, 359–562. Mąkol J. and Wohltmann A. (2013) Corrections and additions to the checklist of terrestrial Parasitengona (Actinotrichida: Prostigmata) of the world, excluding Trombiculidae and Walchiidae. Annales Zoologici, Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 63, 1, 15–27. Mehl R. (1979) Checklist of Norwegian ticks and mites (Acari). Norwegian Journal of Entomology, 26, 1, 31–45. Neuman C.J. (1880) Om Sveriges Hydrachnider. Kongliga Svenska VetenskapsAkademiens Handlingar, P.A. Norstedt & söner, 17, 3, 123 pp. Nordqvist J. and Herrmann J. (2008) Vattenkvalster (Acari:Hydrachnidia) på Öland – vanliga men okända. Entomologisk Tidskrift, 129, 1, 1–7. Pons J., Barraclough T.G., Gomez-Zurita J., Cardoso A., Duran D.P., Hazell S., Kamoun S., Sumlin W.D. and Vogler A.P. (2006) Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Systematic Biology, 55, 595–609. Proctor H. (1998) Parasitengona. Velvet mites, chiggers, water mites. Version 09 August 1998. http://tolweb.org/Parasitengona/2581/1998.08.09 in The Tree of Life Web Project, http://tolweb.org/. Proctor H. and Pritchard G. (1989) Neglected predators: water mites (Acari: Parasitengona: Hydrachnellae) in freshwater communities. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 8(1), 100-111. R Development Core Team (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3900051-07-0, URL. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/. R Core Team. (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL. Available from http://www.Rproject. org/. 31 Bock S. (2017) Carl Herman W Andersén, urn:sbl:5779, Svenskt biografiskt lexikon, Riksarkivet, 2017-02-03. Rodrigo A.G., Bertels F., Heled J., Noder R., Shearman H. and Tsai P. (2008) The perils of plenty: what are we going to do with all these genes? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 3893–902. Ronquist F. and Huelsenbeck J.P. (2003) MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19, 1572–1574. Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A., Huelsenbeck J.P. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology, 61, 539–542. Rosenberg N.A. (2007) Statistical tests for taxonomic distinctiveness from observations of monophyly. Evolution, 61, 317–323. Smith I.M. and Cook D.R. (1991) Water mites. pp. 523–592 in: J.H. Thorp and A.P. Covich (eds.) Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. Academic Press, San Diego. Southcott R.V. (1986) Studies on the taxonomy and biology of the subfamily Trombidiinae (Acarina: Trombidiidae) with a critical revision of the genera. Australian Journal of Zoology Supplementary Series, 34, 123, 1–116. Southcott R.V. (1987) The classification of the mite families Trombellidae and Johnstonianidae and related groups, with the description of a new larva (Acarina: Trombellidae: Nothotrombium) from North America. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 111, 1, 25–42. Southcott R.V. (1993) Revision of the taxonomy of the larvae of the subfamily Eutrombidiinae (Acarina: Microtrombidiidae). Invertebrate Taxonomy, 7, 885– 959. Southcott R.V. (1994) Revision of the larvae of the Microtrombidiinae (Acarina: Microtrombidiidae) with notes on life histories. Zoologica 144, 1–155. Stålstedt J., Bergsten J. and Ronquist F. (2013) ”Forms” of water mites (Acari: Hydrachnidia): intraspecific variation or valid species? Ecology and Evolution, 3, 10, 3415–3435. Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D., Filipski A. and Kumar S. (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30, 2725–2729. Viets K. (1936) Spinnentiere oder Arachnoidea. VII. Wassermilben oder Hydracarina (Hydrachnellae und Halacaridae). Tierwelt Deutschlands, 31–32, 574 pp. Walter D.E. and Proctor H.C. (2013) Mites: Ecology, evolution and behaviour. 2nd ed. Life at a Microscale. – Springer, Amsterdam, 494 pp. Welbourn W.C. (1991) Phylogenetic studies of the terrestrial Parasitengona. pp. 163–170. In: Dusbabek F. and Bukva V. (eds.) Modern acarology, vol 2, Academia, Prague, and SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague. Wohltmann A. (1998) Water vapour uptake and drought resistance in immobile instars of Parasitengona (Acari: Prostigmata). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 76, 1741–1754. Wohltmann A. (2000) The evolution of life histories in Parasitengona (Acari: Prostigmata). Acarologia, 41, 145–204. Wohltmann A., Wendt F., Witte H. and Eggers A. (1999) The evolutionary change in the life history patterns in hygrobiontic Parasitengonae (Acari: Prostigmata). In: Needham G.R., Mitchell R., Horn D.J. and Welbourn W.C. (Eds) Acarology IX: Symposia, 165–174 pp. 32 Wohltmann A, Mąkol J. and Gabryś G. (2004) A revision of European Johnstonianinae (Acari: Prostigmata: Parasitengona: Trombidioidea). Annales Zoologici (Warszawa), 54, 3, 595–630. Wohltmann A., Gabryś G. and Mąkol J. (2007) Acari: Terrestrial Parasitengona inhabiting transient biotopes. pp 158–240. In: Gerecke R. (ed.) Süßwasserfauna Mitteleuropas, vol. 7/2-1, Chelicerata, Acari I. Spektrum Elsevier, München. Zhang Z.-Q. (1998) Biology and ecology of trombidiid mites (Acari: Trombidioidea). Experimental and Applied Acarology, 22, 139–155. Zhang Z.-Q. and Fan Q. -H. (2007) Allotanaupodidae, a new family of early derivative Parasitengona (Acari: Prostigmata). Zootaxa, 1517, 152. Zhang Z.-Q., Fan Q.-H., Pesic V., Smit H., Bochkov A.V., Khaustov A.A., Baker A., Wohltmann A., Wen T.-H., Amrine J.W., Beron P., Lin J.-Z., Gabryś G. and Husband R. (2011) Order Trombidiformes Reuter, 1909. In: Zhang, Z.-Q. (Ed.) Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa, 3148: 1–237. 33
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz