MEASURE NAME:
Acronym:
Child Sexual Behavior Inventory
CSBI
Basic Description
Author(s):
Author Contact:
Friedrich, W.N., Ph.D., ABPP
William N. Friedrich, Ph.D., ABPP
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology
Mayo Clinic
200 First Street, S.W.
Rochester, Minnesota 55905
Author Email:
[email protected]
Citation:
Friedrich, W.N. (1997). Child Sexual Behavior Inventory:
Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment
Resources.
To Obtain:
Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
16204 N. Florida Ave.
Lutz, FL 33549
Phone: 800-727-9329
E-mail:
[email protected]
Website:
www.parinc.com
Cost per copy (in US $): $2.20
Copyright:
Yes
Description:
The 38-item Child Sexual Behavior Inventory (CSBI) was
developed to assess children who have been sexually abused or
are suspected of having been sexually abused. The measure is
designed to be completed by a female caregiver. It is one of the
most widely used measures of sexual behaviors.
It yields a total CSBI score, a Developmentally Related Sexual
Behavior Score, and a Sexual Abuse Specific Items Score, with
norms by age and gender for these scales.
It also yields scores on 9 domains: 1) Boundary Problems, 2)
Exhibitionism, 3) Gender Role Behavior, 4) Self- Stimulation, 5)
Sexual Anxiety, 6) Sexual Interest, 7) Sexual Intrusiveness, 8)
Sexual Knowledge, and 9) Voyeuristic Behavior.
The CSBI is a revision of the CSBI-R and CSBI-1. It contains 22
of the items from the previous version, with the remaining items
reworded for greater readability (Friedrich et al., 2001).
Theoretical Orientation Developed due to recognition that precocious sexual behavior is
Summary:
related to sexual abuse.
Domains Assessed:
Languages Available:
1. Trauma: Sexual maltreatment/abuse (child)
2. Sexual behaviors (child)
3.
4.
5.
6.
Dutch, English, French, German, Latvian, Lithuanian, Moldovan,
Child Sexual Behavior Inventory
NCTSN Measure Review Database
www.NCTSN.org
1
Polish, Spanish, Swedish
Age Range:
# of Items:
Time to Complete (min):
Time to Score (min):
Periodicity:
Response Format:
2.00 - 12.0 Measure Type:
Screening
38
Measure Format:
Questionnaire
8
Reporter:
Parent/caregiver
5
Education Level:
5.00
Reports on behavior over past 6 months.
The response format for each behavior is a 4-point Likert scale,
which indicates the frequency of behavior (0=never to 3=at least
once per week).
Materials Needed:
Yes
(check all that apply)
Material Notes:
Paper and pencil
Testing stimuli
Computer
Physiological equipment
Video equipment
Other
The 38-item CSBI is also reproduced in the Appendix of Friedrich
et al. (2001).
The following is from www.parinc.com as of 6/05:
1. CSBI Introductory Kit: $149.00 (Includes CSBI Professional
Manual and 50 Test Booklets.)
2. CSBI Professional Manual: $47.00
3. CSBI Test Booklets (pkg/25): $55.00 (The booklets have
handscorable templates. Pricing is based on the purchase of this
item.)
Sample Items:
Domains
Trauma: Sexual
abuse
Scale
Sexual Behavior
Verbal Sexual
Behavior
Sexual Intrusiveness
Gender Role
Behavior
Boundary Issues
Sexual Interest
Exhibitionism
Notes (additional scales and domains):
Sexual Knowledge
Self-Stimulation
Voyeuristic Behavior
Sexual Anxiety
Sample Items
not available
not available
not available
not available
not available
not available
not available
Child Sexual Behavior Inventory
NCTSN Measure Review Database
www.NCTSN.org
2
Information Provided: (check all that apply)
Diagnostic information DSM-III
Diagnostic information DSM-IV
Strengths
Yes
Areas of concerns/risks
Program evaluation information
Yes
Continuous assessment
Yes
Raw Scores
Yes
Yes
Standard Scores
Percentile
Graph (e.g., of elevated scale)
Dichotomous assessment
Clinical friendly output
Written feedback
Other
Training
Training to Administer:
(check all that apply)
Yes
Training to Interpret:
(check all that apply)
Training Notes:
Yes
None
Must be a psychologist
Via manual/video
Prior experience psych
testing & interpretation
Training by experienced
clinician (<4 hours)
Training by experienced
clinician (≥4 hours)
None
Must be a psychologist
Via manual/video
Training by experienced
clinician (<4 hours)
Yes
Prior experience psych
Training by experienced
testing & interpretation
clinician (≥4 hours)
The manual states that interpretation “requires graduate training in
psychology, counseling, social work, psychiatry, or a closely
related field, as well as relevant training in the interpretation of
psychological tests at an accredited college or university.”
Parallel or Alternate Forms
Parallel Forms?
Alternate Forms:
Forms for Different Ages:
If so, are forms comparable:
Any Altered Versions of Measure:
Describe:
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
1. There are two previous versions of this measure
(versions 1 and 2). The CSBI-2 included 9 items that
were revised or added to the original version.
The 36-item CSBI-2 can be seen at the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, National
Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information
website:
http://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/usermanuals/sexabus
e/sexabusel.cfm
The CSBI differs from the CSBI-2 in that it contains 22
of the original items, and the remaining items were
reworded to make them easier to read. The manual
reports that the latest version also differs from previous
versions in terms of the age groups for which norms
were calculated.
Child Sexual Behavior Inventory
NCTSN Measure Review Database
www.NCTSN.org
3
Earlier versions had norms for ages 2-6 and 7-12. The
latest version has norms for 2-5, 6-9, and 10-12.
2. There is an Adolescent Clinical Sexual Behavior
Inventory (ACSBI), a 45-item Self- and Parent-Report
measure specific to the age-appropriate sexual
behaviors of adolescents. (Friedrich, Lysne, Sim, &
Shamos, 2004).
From the above study, it appears that this measure
assesses children between the ages of 12-18 years.
Self-Report and Parent-Report versions are reviewed
in this database.
Population Used to Develop Measure
The clinical sample included 276 children aged 2-12 with confirmed history of sexual
abuse, typically occurring within the last 12 months. Sample was multisite (East and West
coasts, Midwest, major communities). Most children were referrals to agencies; others
were in therapy at the time of the study.
Data regarding the normative and clinical samples used to validate and standardize the
current version of the CSBI are provided in the Notes under “Norms.”
Psychometrics
Global Rating (scale based on Hudall Stamm, 1996):
Psychometrically matured, used in multiple peer reviewed articles by different people
Norms:
Yes
For separate age groups:
Yes
For clinical populations:
Yes
Separate for men and women: Yes
For other demographic groups: No
Notes:
Friedrich (1997)
1. Normative data for the CSBI represent 1,114 children, combined from
three nonclinical samples: (a) 723 children who were in the waiting area of a
Community Pediatrics Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota; (b) 111 children who
were in the waiting area of a Community Family Medicine Clinic in
Rochester, Minnesota; and (c) 280 children from the Los Angeles, California,
area, the majority of whom were lower income and of minority status."
The total sample included the following: 49.7% female, 51.3% males; 77.7%
Caucasian, 7.7% African-American, and 11.6 % Latino.
Norms are presented in the manual’s appendix by gender and age group (25 years, 6-9 years, 10-12 years).
There are no norms for fathers.
2. Data were also collected in multiple sites in the U.S. and Canada on 512
children with a documented history of sexual abuse. The average time since
abuse was 10.9 months (SD=13.9), the average length of abuse was 9.3
months (SD=12.3 months).
Child Sexual Behavior Inventory
NCTSN Measure Review Database
www.NCTSN.org
4
Children were aged 2-12 (M=7.44; SD=2.63); 62.7% female, 37.3% male;
76% White, 6.9% African American, 8.7% Hispanic, 2.2% Asian, 2.4%
Native American, 3.8% Other; 62.4% of families had annual incomes below
$25,000.
Clinical Cutoffs:
Specify Cutoffs:
Used in Major Studies:
Specify Studies:
Yes
T>65 is the cutoff for clinically signficant problems
Yes
Friedrich, Jaworski, Huxsahl, & Bengtson (1997); Friedrich,
Grambsch, Damon, Hewitt, Koverola, Lang, Wolfe, &
Broughton (1992); National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and
Neglect, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (2001)
Child Sexual Behavior Inventory
NCTSN Measure Review Database
www.NCTSN.org
5
Reliability:
Type:
Rating
Statistics
Min
Max
Avg
Test-Retest-# days: 14
Acceptable
r
0.91
Internal Consistency:
Acceptable
alpha
0.92
0.93
0.92
Inter-Rater:
Acceptable
r
0.42
0.79
0.55
Parallel/Alternate Forms:
unknown
Notes:
Friedrich et al. (2001) present reliability data on three samples: 1) 1,114 children who
comprised the normative sample, 2) 620 sexually abused children, and 3) 577 psychiatric
outpatients. Similar data are presented in the manual, although no outpatient data are
presented. All data reported below and in the table are from the current version of the
CSBI.
TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY
63 parents from the normative sample completed a second CSBI two weeks later.
INTERNAL CONSISTENCY
Examined in multiple samples (Friedrich et al., 2001). The alpha for the sexual abuse
sample is reported above.
Normative sample: whole sample (alpha=.72); males (.72), females (.73)
Children aged 2-5 (.72), aged 6-9 (.71), aged 10-12 (.71)
Sexual abuse sample: whole sample (alpha=.92); males (.92), females (.93)
Children aged 2-5 (.93), aged 6-9 (.91), aged 10-12 (.91)
Outpatient sample: whole sample (alpha=.83); males (.79), females (.88)
There were no age differences when internal consistency was examined separately for
ages 2-5, 6-9, and 10-12 years.
INTERRATER RELIABILTY
For correlations between 24 normative sample mother-father pairs, married and living
together (r=.79, p<.01).
For correlations between 22 primary nurses on an inpatient psychiatric ward (slightly
modified CSBI) and primary female caregivers (r=.42, p<.01).
For correlations between 61 teachers (using the 3 sex-related items of the TRF) and
parents (r=.44, p<.01).
Content Validity:
From Friedrich (1997, p. 37)
A pool of 40 items was developed after it was determined that sexual behavior items on the
CBCL were useful in discriminating sexually abused from nonabused children.
Items were piloted in a pilot study involving 71 nonabused and 35 sexually abused children,
with mean scores differing between the two groups.
Interviews with 32 caregivers of sexually abused children led to the identification of additional
sexual behaviors; 8 items were added and 16 were revised.
Following additional data collection, 13 of the 48 items were dropped (5 were poorly worded,
Child Sexual Behavior Inventory
NCTSN Measure Review Database
www.NCTSN.org
6
3 pertained to the child’s exposure to family nudity, and 5 assessed toileting or somatic
behaviors), leaving 35 items.
The 35-item CSBI was studied and found to differentiate sexually abused from nonabused
children. It was later revised (6 items were dropped, 3 were reworded, and 7 new items were
added).
The 36-item CSBI was found to also differentiate sexually abused from nonabused children.
It was revised to become the current version. It consists of 22 of the original items and 12 of
the items “rewritten for clarity and simplicity.” One item was dropped and 3 were added.
Construct Validity: (check all that apply)
Validity Type
Not known Not found
Convergent/Concurrent
Nonclinical Clinical
Samples
Samples
Yes
Discriminant
Yes
Sensitive to Change
Yes
Yes
Intervention Effects
Yes
Longitudinal/Maturation Effects
Sensitive to Theoretically
Distinct Groups
Yes
Yes
Factorial Validity
Notes:
Diverse
Samples
Yes
Yes
Numerous studies using different versions of the CSBI have demonstrated the
validity of the different versions. CSBI scores are positively correlated with
scores on the Child Behavior Checklist (Drach, Wientzen, & Ricci, 2001;
Mannarino & Cohen, 1996a), intensity of parents’ reaction to the abuse
(Mannarino & Cohen, 1996b), and teacher ratings of sexual behavior on the
Teacher’s Report Form (Friedrich et al., 1992).
The CSBI discriminates between sexually abused and non-sexually abused
children (Friedrich, Jaworski, Huxsahl, & Bengtson, 1997; Wherry, Jolly,
Feldman, & Adam, 1995).
It has also been found to be sensitive to treatment effects with sexually abused
children aged 3-6 treated using Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, showing greater
declines on this measure than with children treated using nondirective supportive
therapy (Cohen & Mannarino, 1996). More details regarding the validity of earlier
versions of the CSBI can be found in the manual (Friedrich, 1997).
For the current version of the CSBI, Friedrich et al. (2001) examined the
psychometrics of the measure using normative, outpatient, and sexual-abuse
samples. CSBI scores were significantly correlated with CBCL Internalizing and
Externalizing scores for each of the three groups studied. They found that the
sexual-abuse group scored higher on all items than did the other two groups,
and the outpatient sample scored significantly higher than did the normative
sample on 7 items. Analyses by age and gender indicated that this pattern was
replicated by age and gender.
CSBI scores were also significantly related to aspects of the abuse, such as
penetration, duration, frequency, multiple perpetrators. Drach et al. (2001),
however, found that in their sample of children involved in forensic evaluations,
there was no relation between CSBI scores and what they determined a
Child Sexual Behavior Inventory
NCTSN Measure Review Database
www.NCTSN.org
7
“diagnosis” of sexual abuse (see Notes under “Criterion Validity”). However, this
may have been due to how they made their “diagnosis.”
STUDIES WITH OTHER CULTURAL GROUPS AND DIVERSE POPULATIONS
Note: These studies have generally been conducted with earlier versions of the
CSBI.
Studies have found that children in other cultural groups exhibit different levels of
sexual behaviors. In a samples of non-sexually abused children, Larsson,
Svedin, & Friedrich (2000) and Friedrich et al. (2000) found that Swedish and
Dutch children exhibit more sexual behavior than did American children.
The authors suggested that cultural context affects what behavior is permitted
and what behavior is considered problematic. These studies suggest that
different norms would be needed for different cultural groups.
Schoentijes, Deboutte, & Friedrich (1999) examined the psychometrics of the 44item CSBI in a normative Dutch sample. They report the frequency with which
items were endorsed. They found good internal consistency (alpha=.86), and
identified 7 factors using principal components analysis with a varimax rotation.
CSBI scores were related to CBCL Internalizing and Externalizing scores.
Criterion Validity: (check all that apply)
Measures used as criterion:
Not known Not found
Predictive Validity:
Nonclinical Clinical
Samples
Samples
Yes
Postdictive Validity:
Diverse
Samples
Yes
Sensitivity Rate(s):
0.91
Specificity Rate(s):
0.49
Positive Predictive Power:
Negative Predictive Power:
Notes:
Friedrich et al. (2001) report the Sensitivity and Specificity rates shown above.
The rates above are the average rates of the normative versus sexually abused
group.
Sensitivity
.88-.95 for comparisons of normative versus sexually abused groups
.43-.55 for comparisons of psychiatric outpatient versus sexually abused groups
Specificity
.43-.55 for comparisons of normative versus sexually abused groups
.78-.87 for comparisons of psychiatric outpatient versus sexually abused
groups.
Drach, Wientzen, & Ricci (2001) report a Positive Predictive Value of .28 and
Negative Predictive Value of .72 in a forensic child sexual-abuse population.
These data are not shown in the table because there are methodological
problems in the way that they defined a “diagnosis of sexual abuse.” They
Child Sexual Behavior Inventory
NCTSN Measure Review Database
www.NCTSN.org
8
defined the “diagnosis” as the result of the forensic evaluation.
They suggested that while positive screens should be followed up they should
not be used as a diagnostic indicator. The authors did suggest that the way
they determined “diagnosis” may yield too many false negatives.
Limitations of Psychometrics and Other Comments Regarding Psychometrics:
1. PRO: The authors conducted age and gender analyses of the current CSBI, looking at
differences between boys and girls, aged 2-5, 6-9, and 10-12. The results generally show
similar reliability and validity data across all groups.
2 While the psychometrics have been examined in studies involving lower socioeconomic
status individuals, the majority of studies have been conducted with Whites.
3. The measure was designed to be completed by female caregivers. Although the testretest reliability between mothers and fathers from intact homes is good, more research is
needed regarding reports from fathers if fathers’ reports are to be used.
4. While the measure has been translated in multiple languages (see Languages Other
Than English), translations and studies that involved them were generally conducted with
earlier versions of the CSBI.
Consumer Satisfaction
Unknown.
Languages Other than English
Language:
Translation Quality (check all that apply)
1= Has been translated
2= Has been translated and back translated - translation appears good and valid.
3= Measure has been found to be reliable with this language group.
4= Psychometric properties overall appear to be good for this language group.
5= Factor structure is similar for this language group as it is for the development group.
6 = Norms are available for this language group.
7= Measure was developed for this language group.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Dutch
French
German
Spanish
Swedish
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
6
7
Yes
Child Sexual Behavior Inventory
NCTSN Measure Review Database
www.NCTSN.org
9
Use with Trauma Populations
Populations for which measure has demonstrated evidence of reliability and validity:
Yes
Physical abuse
Natural disaster
Terrorism
Sexual abuse
Accidents
Immigration related trauma
Neglect
Imprisonment
Kidnapping/hostage
Domestic Violence
Witness death
Traumatic loss (death)
Community violence
Assault
Other
Medical trauma
War/combat
Use with Diverse Populations
USE WITH DIVERSE POPULATIONS RATING SCALE
1. Measure is known (personal communication, conference presentation) to have been used with members of this group.
2=Studies in peer-reviewed journals have included members of this group who have completed the measure.
3=Measures have been found to be reliable with this group.
4=Psychometric properties well established with this group.
5=Norms are available for this group (or norms include a significant proportion of individuals from this group)
6=Measure was developed specifically for this group.
Population Type:
Degree of Usage: (check all that apply)
1
1. Developmental disability
2. Disabilities
3. Lower socio-economic status
4. Rural populations
5.
6.
Notes (including other diverse populations):
2
3
4
5
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
6
Pros and Cons/Qualitative Impression
Pros:
1. Sexual behaviors are important to assess, and this measure appears useful in
capturing different dimensions of sexual behaviors.
2. This is one of the most widely used and well-researched tests tapping the domain of
child sexual behaviors. The Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children also assesses for
sexual behavior, but does so using self-report.
3. Wording of items: items appear to be clear. Rating scale is an improvement over
previous rating scales with sexual behavior items (e.g., CBCL).
4. Psychometrics have been evaluated by age and gender.
5. Measure has been demonstrated to show change with treatment.
Cons:
1. The item uses a 6-month timeframe. This timeframe is not appropriate for treatment
outcome studies of shorter or similar duration. The timeframe would add error if it is
adhered to and informants are responsive to it. Although the timeframe can be adjusted,
the norms were gathered using that time period and would not necessarily apply with a
new timeframe.
Child Sexual Behavior Inventory
NCTSN Measure Review Database
www.NCTSN.org
10
2. The measure is face valid and there are no validity scales. There were validity items
used during the normative studies, but they were dropped from the current version. The
manual advises users to determine, during follow-up interviews, whether caregivers read
and interpreted items appropriately.
3. Although psychometrics have been examined in studies involving lower-socioeconomicstatus individuals, the majority of studies have been conducted with Whites. More studies
are needed with diverse populations.
4. The measure was designed to be completed by female caregivers. Although the testretest reliability between mothers and fathers from intact homes is good, more research is
needed regarding reports from fathers if fathers’ reports are to be used.
5. While the measure has been translated in multiple languages, translations and studies
that involved them were generally conducted with earlier versions of the CSBI.
6. THIS IS A CAUTION RATHER THAN A CON: While the measure has been found to be
valid and useful, the authors and others point out that many sexually abused children
display low levels of sexual behavior problems, and many children who were not sexually
abused exhibit high levels of sexual behavior problems.
Child Sexual Behavior Inventory
NCTSN Measure Review Database
www.NCTSN.org
11
References
(Representative sampling of publications, presentations, psychometric references)
Published References:
The reference for the manual is:
Friedrich, W.N. (1997). Child Sexual Behavior Inventory: Professional Manual. Odessa, FL:
Psychological Assessment Resources.
A PsychInfo literature search of "Child Sexual Behavior Inventory” or “CSBI" anywhere
(6/05) revealed that the measure has been referenced in 88 peer-reviewed journal articles.
Note: It is difficult to search only for this version, but a search for the manual for this version
revealed it had been referenced in 11 peer-reviewed journal articles. Given that this most
likely underrepresents the measure’s use, the numbers from the full search are presented.
A sampling of the articles is listed below along with references for the original versions of
the CSBI:
1. Cohen, J.A, & Mannarino, A.P. (1996a). Factors that mediate treatment outcome of
sexually abused preschool children. American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,
35(10), 1402-1420.
2. Cohen, J.A., & Mannarino, A.P. (1996b). A treatment outcome study for sexually abused
preschool children: Initial findings. Journal of the American Academy of Child and
Adolescent Psychiatry, 35(1), 42-50.
3. Costintino, C.E., Meyer-Bahlburg, H.F.L., Alpert, J.L., Weinberg, S.L., & Gaines, R.G.
(1995). Sexual behavior problems and psychopathology symptoms in sexually abused girls.
American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 34(8), 1033-1042.
4. Drach, K.M., Wientzen, J., & Ricci, L.R. (2001). The diagnostic utility of sexual behavior
problems in diagnosing sexual abuse in a forensic child abuse evaluation clinic. Child Abuse
& Neglect, 25, 489-503.
5. Friedrich, W.N. (1993). Sexual behavior in sexually abused children. Violence Update,
3(5), 7-11.
6. Friedrich, W.N., Grambsch, P., Broughton, D., Kuiper, J., & Beilke, R.L. (1991).
Normative sexual behavior in children. Pediatrics, 88(3), 456-464. (Reference for CSBI-1.)
7. Friedrich, W.N., Grambsch, P., Damon, L., Hewitt, S.K., Koverola, C., Lang, R.A., Wolfe,
V., & Broughton, D. (1992). Child Sexual Behavior Inventory: Normative and Clinical
Comparisons, Psychological Assessment, 4(3), 300-311.
8. Friedrich, W.N., Jaworski, T.M., Huxsahl, J.E., & Bengtson, B.S. (1997). Dissociative and
sexual behaviors in children and adolescents with sexual abuse and psychiatric histories,
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(2), 155-171.
9. Friedrich, W.N., Lysne, M., Sim, L., & Shamos, S. (2004). Assessing sexual behavior in
high-risk adolescents with the Adolescent Clinical Sexual Behavior Inventory. Child
Maltreatment, 9(3), 239-250.
10. Friedrich, W.N., Sandfort, T.G.M., Oostveen, J., & Cohen-Kettenis, P.T. (2000).
Cultural differences in sexual behavior: 2-6 year old Dutch and American children. Journal
of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 12, 117-129.
Child Sexual Behavior Inventory
NCTSN Measure Review Database
www.NCTSN.org
12
11. Larsson, I., Svedin, C., Friedrich, W.N. (2000). Differences and similarities in sexual
behavior among pre-schoolers in Sweden and USA. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 54,4:251258.
12. Mannarino, A.P., & Cohen, J.A. (1996a). Abuse-related attributions and perceptions,
general attributions, and locus of control in sexually abused girls. Journal of Interpersonal
Violence, 11(2), 162-180.
13. Mannarino, A.P., & Cohen, J.A. (1996b). Family-related variables and psychological
symptom formation in sexually abused girls. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 5(1), 105-120.
14. National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect, U.S. Department of Health &
Human Services, 2001.
15. Schoentjes, E., Deboutte, D., & Friedrich, W. (1999). Child Sexual Behavior Inventory:
A Dutch-speaking normative sample. Pediatrics, 104(4), 885-893.
16. Silovsky, J.F., & Larissa, N. (2002). Characteristics of young children with sexual
behavior problems: A pilot study. Child Maltreatment, 7(3), 187-197.
17. Wherry, J.N., Jolly, J.B., Feldman, J., & Adam, B. (1995). Child Sexual Behavior
Inventory scores for inpatient boys: An exploratory study, 4(3), 95-105.
Unpublished References:
A PsychInfo literature search of "Child Sexual Behavior Inventory" or "CSBI" anywhere
(6/05) revealed that the measure has been referenced in 0 conferences and 12
dissertations.
Number of Published References:
88
Number of Unpublished References:
12
(based on author provided information and a PsychInfo search, not including dissertations)
(based on a PsychInfo search of unpublished doctoral dissertations)
Author Comments:
The author provided feedback, which was integrated. The publishers commented that
although this measure represents a revision of early versions of the CSBI, it is published
under the title "Child Sexual Behavior Inventory (CSBI)."
Citation for Review:
Jared Dinehart, Chris Layne, Ph.D., Madhur Kulkarni, M.S.
Editor of Review:
Chandra Ghosh Ippen, Ph.D. & Madhur Kulkarni, M.S.
Last Updated:
6/22/2005
PDF Available:
yes
This project was funded by the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA),
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The views, policies and opinions
expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of SAMHSA or HHS.
Child Sexual Behavior Inventory
NCTSN Measure Review Database
www.NCTSN.org
13