This article is a Plant Cell Advance Online Publication. The date of its first appearance online is the official date of publication. The article has been
edited and the authors have corrected proofs, but minor changes could be made before the final version is published. Posting this version online
reduces the time to publication by several weeks.
RICE SALT SENSITIVE3 Forms a Ternary Complex with JAZ
and Class-C bHLH Factors and Regulates Jasmonate-Induced
Gene Expression and Root Cell Elongation
CW
Yosuke Toda,a Maiko Tanaka,a Daisuke Ogawa,a Kyo Kurata,a Ken-ichi Kurotani,a Yoshiki Habu,b Tsuyu Ando,b
Kazuhiko Sugimoto,b Nobutaka Mitsuda,c Etsuko Katoh,b Kiyomi Abe,b Akio Miyao,b Hirohiko Hirochika,b
Tsukaho Hattori,a and Shin Takedaa,b,1
a Bioscience
and Biotechnology Center, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Kannondai, Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan
c Bioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba 305-8562, Japan
b National
Plasticity of root growth in response to environmental cues and stresses is a fundamental characteristic of land plants.
However, the molecular basis underlying the regulation of root growth under stressful conditions is poorly understood. Here,
we report that a rice nuclear factor, RICE SALT SENSITIVE3 (RSS3), regulates root cell elongation during adaptation to
salinity. Loss of function of RSS3 only moderately inhibits cell elongation under normal conditions, but it provokes
spontaneous root cell swelling, accompanied by severe root growth inhibition, under saline conditions. RSS3 is preferentially
expressed in the root tip and forms a ternary complex with class-C basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors and
JASMONATE ZIM-DOMAIN proteins, the latter of which are the key regulators of jasmonate (JA) signaling. The mutated
protein arising from the rss3 allele fails to interact with bHLH factors, and the expression of a significant portion of JAresponsive genes is upregulated in rss3. These results, together with the known roles of JAs in root growth regulation,
suggest that RSS3 modulates the expression of JA-responsive genes and plays a crucial role in a mechanism that sustains
root cell elongation at appropriate rates under stressful conditions.
INTRODUCTION
In land plants, roots absorb water and soluble nutrients, in addition to anchoring the shoot system. The spatial distribution of
roots, including primary and lateral roots, largely depends on
environmental signals, such as water availability, gravity, and
light, which are perceived by the root apex (Kiss et al., 2002,
2003; Kobayashi et al. 2007) and modulate regional cell elongation rates via mechanisms that involve auxins (Swarup et al.,
2005; Kaneyasu et al., 2007).
Postembryonic root growth is sustained by continuous cell
proliferation and subsequent cell differentiation. Cell division is
maintained in the root apical meristem, or meristematic zone
(MZ), which provides cells for elongation in the basal region,
called the elongation zone (EZ). After elongation, cells undergo
further differentiation or maturation in the maturation zone
(MTZ), where root hairs and thickened secondary cell walls are
formed. In contrast with root orientation, the rate of root growth
is elaborately regulated in response to environmental changes at
the level of both cell division and cell elongation. For example,
1 Address
correspondence to [email protected].
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings
presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the
Instructions for Authors (www.plantcell.org) is: Shin Takeda (takeda@agr.
nagoya-u.ac.jp).
C
Some figures in this article are displayed in color online but in black and
white in the print edition.
W
Online version contains Web-only data.
www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.113.112052
when a plant grows under conditions of low phosphate availability, primary root growth stalls and the number and length of
lateral roots increases (Svistoonoff et al., 2007). In the primary
root, the phosphate deficiency is perceived in the apical region,
resulting in the arrest of cell division and subsequent inhibition of
cell elongation. This mode of regulation is mediated by LOW
PHOSPHATE ROOT1 (LPR1), which encodes a multicopper
oxidase (Svistoonoff et al., 2007). LPR1 has been proposed to
modify a growth regulator in response to phosphate depletion in
the apical region of the primary root. This in turn leads to the
expression of genes, including those responsive to reactive
oxygen species and to jasmonate (JA) and its derivatives
(Chacón-López et al., 2011).
JAs are a class of plant hormone involved in defense-related
responses caused by wounding and pathogens and in the
regulation of developmental processes, including fruit ripening,
pollen production, root growth, tendril coiling, and senescence
(Creelman and Mullet, 1997; Wasternack, 2007). JAs are also
involved in the responses to a variety of abiotic stresses, such
as salinity and drought stress (Wasternack, 2007; Takeuchi et al.
2011). In cultured Arabidopsis thaliana cells, JAs mediate the
transcriptional reprogramming of genes, as reflected in the
repression of the cell cycle and the biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids, including lignin precursors (Pauwels et al., 2008). In
JA signaling, JASMONATE ZIM-domain proteins (JAZs) have an
important role in gene regulation by physically interacting with
members of the R/B-like (or MYC-type) basic helix-loop-helix
(bHLH) transcription factors, such as Arabidopsis homolog
of myelocytomatosis oncogene MYC2. In the presence of
The Plant Cell Preview, www.aspb.org ã 2013 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1 of 17
2 of 17
The Plant Cell
Ile-conjugated JA, the F-box protein CORONATINE INSENSITIVE1
(COI1) binds to JAZs, resulting in their polyubiquitination and
subsequent degradation by 26S proteasome (Chini et al., 2007;
Thines et al., 2007). This releases the repression of R/B-like
bHLH transcription factors from JAZs, leading to the transcriptional regulation of downstream target genes. In rice (Oryza
sativa), overexpression of JAZ9, also called TIFY11a, using
a stress-inducible promoter was reported to alleviate the growth
inhibition resulting from salt and dehydration stress (Ye et al.,
2009), although the downstream factors involved in the process
were not identified.
In Arabidopsis, exogenously supplied JAs inhibit root growth,
in terms of both cell division and cell elongation (Chen et al.,
2011). This inhibition is completely suppressed in coi1 (Lorenzo
et al., 2004; Chen et al., 2011). By contrast, loss-of-function
mutations of MYC2 (jasmonate-insensitive1) exhibit weaker
suppression of JA-induced root growth inhibition than coi1,
suggesting that activation of MYC2 does not account for all of
the JA-mediated inhibition of root growth (Lorenzo et al., 2004).
Consistent with this, MYC2 was found to influence the expression of only a subset of JA-responsive genes (Dombrecht et al.,
2007). Moreover, myc2 combined with loss-of-function mutations of MYC3 and MYC4, the R/B-like bHLHs closely related
to MYC2, further suppressed the JA-induced root growth inhibition, but the myc2 myc3 myc4 triple mutant was still relatively sensitive to JA than coi1 (Fernández-Calvo et al., 2011).
Recently, MYC2 was suggested to reduce root meristem activity
by repressing PLETHORA expression upon the activation of JA
signaling (Chen et al., 2011). However, the transcriptional regulatory mechanisms that inhibit root cell elongation after JA
perception remained unclear.
Salinity represents a widespread problem in agriculture. Despite extensive studies of the salt stress response and tolerance
using a model dicot, Arabidopsis (Zhu, 2001; Yamaguchi and
Blumwald, 2005; Takeda and Matsuoka, 2008; Qin et al., 2011),
the mechanism underlying the control of root growth under
salinity is still not well understood, especially in monocots. We
previously showed that a rice protein RICE SALT SENSITIVE1
(RSS1), whose stability is controlled in a cell cycle phase–
dependent manner, is required for the maintenance of meristem
functions in the shoot and root under stressful conditions
(Ogawa et al., 2011). In rss1 roots, cell proliferation activity is
reduced upon salinity stress, resulting in a decrease in the
number of cells in both the MZ and EZ. This finding illustrates
the importance of the coordinated regulation of cell division and
elongation in response to environmental changes.
In this study, we show that a rice nuclear factor, RSS3, has
a regulatory role in root cell elongation. RSS3 interacts not only
with JAZs, but also with non-R/B-like bHLH transcription factors
and forms an RSS3-JAZ-bHLH ternary complex in the nucleus.
Loss of function of RSS3 activates the expression of a subset of
JA-induced genes in the root apex and restricts cell elongation
but does not primarily affect cell division activity. Under highsalinity conditions, rss3 mutants exhibit severely inhibited root
growth, concomitant with root cell swelling. These results reveal
a molecular mechanism for the modulation of JA-responsive
gene regulation, which is especially crucial for the control of root
elongation in response to stressful conditions.
RESULTS
The rss3 Mutant Has a Defect in Root Cell Elongation
In the course of a genetic screen of rice to identify loci responsible
for salt tolerance (Ogawa et al., 2011), we identified a recessive
mutant designated rss3. When grown under high-salinity conditions, rss3 exhibited severely impaired root growth compared
with the wild type (Figures 1A and 1B; see Supplemental Figure 1A
online). Root growth in the absence of salinity stress was also inhibited in rss3, but only moderately. The length of cells in the MTZ
of roots of rss3 plants grown under unstressed conditions was
markedly shorter than those of the wild type (see Supplemental
Figure 1B online). The inhibition of root growth in rss3 appeared to
be primarily due to reduced cell elongation because the size of the
EZ, but not of the MZ, was reduced in the mutant, and the number
of cells in both the EZ and MZ was not affected in the mutant
(Figures 1C and 1D). The exaggerated inhibition of root growth
under salinity conditions also appeared to be mainly due to compromised cell elongation but was accompanied by aberrant cellular
arrangement and the formation of oblique cell plates in the MZ,
swelling of the cells in the EZ (see Supplemental Figures 2A and
2B online), and a waviness of the root surface at the MTZ (Figure
1E). Moreover, rss3 roots show impaired flexibility, in a salinitydependent manner. When extracted from the medium, the wildtype roots exhibited a paintbrush-like shape, but rss3 roots did not,
due to stiffness (Figure 1A). These rss3 phenotypes were observed
both in seminal and adventitious crown roots, although rss3
showed a slight decrease in the number of crown roots, regardless
of the salinity conditions (see Supplemental Figure 1C online).
Collectively, these results suggest that RSS3 has an important
role in root cell elongation and has additional functions in
regulating root elongation under high-salinity conditions.
When seedlings were grown under continuous light, root coiling
was frequently observed in the wild type under nonstressed conditions but not under salinity stress. By contrast, root coiling was
not observed in rss3, even under nonstressed conditions (see
Supplemental Figures 3A and 3B online). This is not due to a defect in the gravity-sensing machinery since root gravitropism is not
impaired in rss3 (see Supplemental Figure 3C online). These results also suggest that the flexibility of rss3 roots is impaired.
RSS3 Encodes a Nuclear Protein Homologous to the
Regulatory Domain of the R/B-Like bHLH
Transcription Factors
The causative gene of the rss3 mutant was identified by mapbased cloning as Os11g0446000 (Figure 2A). Among four genes
located in the mapped region, we found a deletion in
Os11g0446000 in rss3. Transformation with a genomic fragment
of the wild-type allele of Os11g0446000 complemented the recessive mutant phenotype of rss3 (see Supplemental Figure 4A
online). RSS3 encodes a protein consisting of 458 amino acids.
RSS3 contains a region homologous to the postulated regulatory domain conserved among the R/B-like bHLH transcription
factors (Li et al., 2006), which contains four conserved regions
(I to IV) (Figures 2B and 2C). Region II is predicted to constitute
the central sequence of the JAZ interacting domain (Cheng et al.,
Control of Root Cell Elongation by RSS3
3 of 17
Figure 1. Impaired Root Growth of rss3 under Salinity Conditions.
(A) and (B) Wild-type (WT) and rss3 seedlings were grown with (+) or without (2) 100 mM NaCl for 7 d.
(A) Seedlings.
(B) Roots floating on water.
(C) Propidium iodide staining of the primary roots of 3-d-old wild-type and rss3 seedlings, grown in the presence or absence of 100 mM NaCl. Red and
white arrowheads indicate the border of the MZ and EZ, and of the EZ and MTZ, respectively. Images were generated by concatenating two or more
pictures.
(D) Length (left) and number of cells (right) in the MZ and EZ of the root tips of 3-d-old wild-type and rss3 seedlings, grown with or without 100 mM NaCl.
Mean 6 SD, n $ 3. Asterisks indicate a Student’s t test P value < 0.05.
(E) The MTZs of 7-d-old roots of wild-type and rss3 seedlings grown in the presence or absence of NaCl were observed by differential interference
contrast microscopy.
Bars = 5 cm in (A), 1 cm in (B), 400 µm in (C), and 100 µm in (E).
2011; Fernández-Calvo et al., 2011; Niu et al., 2011). However,
RSS3 does not contain a bHLH domain or another known DNA
binding motif. rss3 contains a 47-bp deletion at the junction
between the 6th intron and 7th exon (Figure 2A), which results in
an altered splicing pattern (see Supplemental Figure 4B online)
and the production of a mutated protein that lacks 15 amino
acids in region IV and six amino acids in the subsequent
C-terminal nonconserved region (Figure 2C).
In seedlings, RSS3 was expressed predominantly in the roots,
particularly in the root tip (see Supplemental Figure 5 online). A
truncated form of RSS3 transcript was expressed in the mutant
roots, at levels that were apparently higher than those of the
nondeleted RSS3 transcript in the wild type (see Supplemental
Figure 4C online). When enhanced green fluorescent protein
(EGFP)–tagged RSS3 was expressed under the control of the
RSS3 promoter, EGFP signals were detected at high levels in
the MZ and at low levels in the EZ of the root tip (Figure 2D, left).
The fusion protein was localized almost exclusively in the nuclei
of the MZ cells (Figure 2D, top right). By contrast, nonfused
EGFP expressed under the control of the constitutive actin gene
promoter was localized in both nuclei and the cytoplasm of MZ
cells. In the EZ region bordering the MZ, RSS3-EGFP was
detected in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm (Figure 2D,
bottom right). These data suggest that RSS3 functions as
a nuclear protein in the root tip and are consistent with the
mutant phenotypes.
RSS3 Interacts with the Transcription Factors bHLH089
and bHLH094
We then used yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screening to search for
a protein that interacts with RSS3. Because the full-length RSS3
caused a self-activation in the Y2H system, we used a version of
RSS3 that lacked the C-terminal 140 amino acids (RSS3N318) as
bait and identified a non-MYC-type bHLH transcription factor
(bHLH094) as an RSS3 binding protein. The cDNA for bHLH094
expressed in the screening was truncated and encoded only the
C-terminal part (amino acids 143 to 256) of this protein (Figure
3A). An analysis using further deletions of the truncated
bHLH094 revealed that a region (amino acids 143 to 200) corresponding to the bHLH and subsequent C-terminal regions
was necessary and sufficient for the interaction with RSS3
(Figure 3B). We also examined the ability of a deletion series of
the RSS3 bait to interact with bHLH094 and identified a region of
RSS3 (amino acids 1 to 203) as being responsible for the interaction (Figure 3C). Importantly, the 21–amino acid sequence
missing from RSS3 in the rss3 mutant was required for the interaction with the bHLH factor.
4 of 17
The Plant Cell
Figure 2. RSS3 Encodes a Nuclear Protein Homologous to the Regulatory Domains of R/B-Like bHLH Proteins.
(A) Map-based cloning of RSS3 (top) and the schematic representation of the RSS3 gene structure (bottom). The rss3 locus was delimited between the
indicated markers. The chromosomal position of the markers and the number of F2 lines exhibiting the rss3 phenotype among 1501 lines examined are
provided in brackets and parentheses, respectively. Exons (closed boxes), 59- or 39-untranslated regions (open boxes), and the position of the first
codon (ATG), stop codon (TAG), and 47-bp deletion in rss3 are indicated.
(B) Schematic structure of RSS3 and an R/B-like bHLH protein, MYC2, of Arabidopsis. The regions conserved between RSS3 and At-MYC2 (I to IV) and
the position of the 21–amino acid (a.a.) deletion in rss3 are shown. bHLH represents the basic helix-loop-helix DNA binding domain.
(C) The amino acid sequences of the N-terminal region of RSS3, RSS3-related proteins, and R/B-like bHLH factors were aligned using the MAFFT
program. The red dotted line represents the sequence lacking in rss3. The conserved regions (I to IV) and JAZ interacting domain of At-MYC2 and AtMYC3 (Fernández-Calvo et al., 2011) are indicated.
(D) GFP signals of rice roots carrying RSS3-EGFP driven by the RSS3 promoter or EGFP driven by the Actin promoter. The red arrowhead indicates the
border between the MZ and EZ. Magnified views of the MZ (top) and EZ (bottom) are shown in the right panels. Bars = 200 mm (left) and 10 mm (right
panels).
In vivo interaction of RSS3 and bHLH094 was examined by
bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) and acceptor
photobleaching Förster resonant energy transfer (apFRET)
analyses (Figure 4). When expressed in onion (Allium cepa)
epidermal cells, yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)–fused RSS3
localized to both the nucleus and cytoplasm, whereas cyan
fluorescent protein (CFP)–fused bHLH094 (bHLH094-CFP) localized exclusively to the nucleus (Figure 4A). For BiFC assay,
the N-terminal region of RSS3 fused to the N-terminal half of
YFP (YFPN-RSS3N203) was coexpressed with the full-length
bHLH094 fused to the C-terminal half of YFP (bHLH094-YFPC).
The complemented YFP signals were predominantly detected in
the nucleus (Figure 4B), indicating the in vivo interaction of the
two proteins. In the apFRET assay, bHLH094-CFP was expressed together with YFP-RSS3N203 or YFP-RSS3full-length in
onion epidermal cells. We measured the strength of the CFP
signal before and after photobleaching of the YFP and calculated the efficiency of FRET (see Methods for details). After
photobleaching of YFP-RSS3N203 or YFP-RSS3full-length in the
nucleus, an increase in bHLH94-CFP signal was observed
(Figures 4C to 4E), reflecting the interaction of the YFP and CFP
fusion proteins. By contrast, energy transfer was not detected
when nonfused YFP was expressed as a control, instead of YFP
fused to RSS3N203 or RSS3full-length (Figures 4C to 4E). These
Control of Root Cell Elongation by RSS3
5 of 17
results strongly suggest that RSS3 and bHLH094 can interact in
plant cells.
We also examined which types of bHLH factors bind to RSS3.
Among more than 150 bHLH factors in rice, bHLH094 belongs
to the class-C group (Li et al., 2006). The distinguishing feature
of class-C members is the conservation of bHLH sequences and
the subsequent C-terminal regions (see Supplemental Figure
6 online). To examine whether RSS3 interacts with other rice
class-C bHLH factors, we selected bHLH089, which is classified
in the same minor clade that bHLH094 belongs to, and three
representative bHLH transcription factors from other clades of
Figure 4. The in Vivo Interaction between RSS3 and bHLH094.
Figure 3. The Interaction between RSS3 and bHLH094 in Yeast.
(A) Schematic representation of the full-length rice bHLH094 protein and
its derivative (Y2H prey) obtained by Y2H screening. The bHLH domain is
represented in blue, and the region that is conserved specifically in the
class-C bHLH subfamily is shown in orange. AD, activation domain of
GAL4.
(B) Analysis of the domains of bHLH094 required for binding to the bait
RSS3N318 as determined by Y2H assay. Numbers indicate terminal
amino acid residues of bHLH094 fused to AD.
(C) bHLH094 interacting domains of RSS3 analyzed by a Y2H assay.
Numbers indicate the terminal amino acid residues of RSS3 fused to
GAL4 DNA binding domain (DBD). rss3 indicates the truncated protein
translated in rss3 with a 21–amino acid deletion. Plasmids carrying AD
alone (B) or DBD alone (C) were used as controls. Yeast transformants
were spotted onto control medium [-(L,W), lacking Leu and Trp] or selective medium [-(A,H,L,W), lacking Ade, His, Leu, and Trp], and the
activation of ADE2 and HIS3 reporter genes was monitored.
(A) The subcellular localization of rice bHLH094-CFP and YFP-RSS3N203
in onion epidermal cells. bHLH094 localized exclusively to the nucleus,
whereas RSS3 localized to both the nucleus and cytoplasm. c, cytoplasm; n, nucleus.
(B) BiFC assay to verify interaction between RSS3 with bHLH094. YFPNRSS3N203 and bHLH094-YFPC or YFPC were transiently expressed with
mRFP1 in onion epidermal cells.
(C) Representative images of the apFRET assay using bHLH094-CFP and
YFP-RSS3N203 (left four) or nonfused YFP (right four). Signal intensities of the
acceptor and donor in onion cells before and after acceptor photobleaching
were analyzed. Pseudocolor images represent fluorescence intensities.
(D) Evaluation of the interaction between YFP-RSS3N203 and the class-C
bHLH proteins fused to CFP by an apFRET assay. FRET efficiency was
shown with mean values 6 SD; n = 3 to 8.
(E) apFRET analysis of full-length RSS3 fused to YFP and class-C bHLH
proteins fused to CFP in the nucleus of onion cells. Mean 6 SD; n = 3 to 5.
The names of rice bHLHs are as reported (Li et al., 2006). The control
indicates the combination of YFP and bHLH094-CFP. Asterisks indicate
P value < 0.05 (Student’s t test).
Bars = 200 µm in (A) and (B) and 20 µm in (C).
6 of 17
The Plant Cell
class-C (bHLH092, bHLH079, and bHLH096). The in vivo interaction between these bHLH factors and RSS3 was examined
by the apFRET assay. By the combinatorial expression of the
respective bHLH-CFPs with YFP-RSS3N203, FRET efficiency
that reflects the physical interaction was positive with bHLH089
but negative with bHLH092, bHLH079, and bHLH096 (Figure
4D). Similarly, the interaction of RSS3full-length with bHLH094 and
bHLH089, but not with bHLH092, was demonstrated by the
apFRET assay (Figure 4E). These results indicate that RSS3 can
specifically interact with bHLH094 and bHLH089. Interestingly,
both full-length bHLH094 and bHLH089 lack the N-terminal
regulatory domains that are conserved among R/B-like bHLH
factors and RSS3 (Li et al., 2006). The genes encoding bHLH094
and bHLH089 were expressed in the root tip, although high
levels of expression were also observed in the basal tissues of
the shoot (see Supplemental Figure 5 online). Taken together,
these results suggest that RSS3 acts as a regulatory module for
bHLH094 and bHLH089 and thus is directly involved in transcriptional regulation in the root tip.
RSS3 Interacts with JAZ Proteins
Figure 5. The Interaction between RSS3 and Rice JAZ Proteins.
(A) Characterization of the interaction between RSS3N318 and rice
JAZ proteins using the Y2H assay. Yeast transformants were spotted
on control medium [-(L,W)] or selective medium [-(H,L,W) + 3-AT,
or –(A,H,L,W)] to monitor ADE2 and HIS3 reporter activity. 3-AT,
3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (5 mM). The vector plasmid expressing only
the DNA binding domain was used as a control (empty). Among the
15 rice JAZs proteins reported by Ye et al. (2009), 12 JAZs were
examined.
(B) and (C) Evaluation of the interaction between RSS3N203 and JAZ
proteins by apFRET analysis. Representative images of apFRET in onion
cells using YFP-RSS3N203 and ECFP-JAZ9 (left four) or nonfused ECFP
(right four) are shown in (B). Pseudocolor images represent fluorescence
intensities. Bar = 10 µm.
As described above, RSS3, but not bHLH094 or bHLH089, contains the regulatory domain conserved among R/B-like bHLH
transcription factors. Considering that region II of the regulatory
domain is a part of the JAZ interacting domain, we speculated that
RSS3 is capable of binding to JAZs. To test this possibility, the
binding abilities of 12 of the 15 rice JAZs (Ye et al., 2009) to RSS3
were examined by the Y2H assay. This analysis showed that JAZ8,
JAZ9, and JAZ11 interact specifically with RSS3 (Figure 5A).
Binding of RSS3 to JAZ9 and JAZ11, but not to JAZ8, was further
confirmed in vivo by the apFRET assay (Figures 5B and 5C).
JAZ9 and JAZ11 were preferentially expressed in the apical
and distal regions of the root tip, respectively (see Supplemental
Figure 5 online). A comparison of Arabidopsis and rice JAZ
proteins revealed that Os-JAZ9 and Os-JAZ11 belong to a ricespecific clade (Ye et al., 2009; see Supplemental Figure 7
online). Both Os-JAZ9 and Os-JAZ11 contain a canonical ZIM
domain and a Jas domain, which are highly conserved among
JAZ proteins (Figure 5D; see Supplemental Figure 7 online). The
Jas domain contains a JAZ degron, which contains a critical role
for JA-Ile–dependent binding to COI1 (Chini et al., 2007; Melotto
et al., 2008; Sheard et al., 2010). In several Arabidopsis JAZ
proteins, the Jas domain and its surrounding region is involved
in the interaction with MYC-type bHLH transcription factors (Chini
et al., 2007; Shyu et al., 2012). Several Os-JAZs were demonstrated to interact with COI1 (Seo et al., 2011), suggesting that the
(C) FRET efficiencies between YFP-RSS3N203 and the respective JAZ
proteins fused to ECFP or nonfused ECFP are shown (mean 6 SD; n = 3
to 4). Asterisks indicate P value < 0.05 (Student’s t test). The respective
JAZ proteins fused to ECFP were coexpressed with YFP fused to
RSS3N203 in onion cells.
(D) Schematic structure of Os-JAZ9, Os-JAZ11, and At-JAZ1. Numbers
indicate the terminal amino acid residues. The position of the conserved
domains is shown. The names of rice JAZs are as reported (Ye et al.,
2009).
Control of Root Cell Elongation by RSS3
7 of 17
rice JAZ homologs are able to function with COI1 in JA perception. Os-JAZ9 and Os-JAZ11 also contain the consensus sequence of the JAZ degron, including the two basic amino acid
residues (6th and 7th relative to the first amino acid of the JAZ
degron) and the strictly conserved Phe residue that are required
for the interaction with COI1 and JA-Ile (Melotto et al., 2008;
Sheard et al., 2010) (see Supplemental Figure 7B online). In addition, most of the amino acids that are involved in hydrogen bond
formation in the complex that forms between JA-Ile, COI1, and
the JAZ peptide are conserved in Os-JAZ9 and Os-JAZ11 and the
two rice COI1 proteins (see Supplemental Figure 8 online).
Moreover, both JAZ9 and JAZ11 was shown to bind to the rice
COI1 homologs at least by Y2H assay in the presence of coronatine, a structural analog of JA-Ile (Lee et al., 2013). Therefore,
Os-JAZ9 and Os-JAZ11 may also function through their binding
to JA-lle.
RSS3 Forms a Ternary Complex with Rice bHLH094
and JAZ9
Based on the finding that RSS3 has two different binding partners, we examined whether RSS3 is capable of forming a ternary
complex with the bHLH factor and JAZ by yeast three-hybrid
assay (Figure 6A). Positive interaction was observed when
RSS3N318 was coexpressed with bHLH094 and JAZ9. Moreover,
when the 21–amino acid deletion mimicking the rss3 mutation
was introduced into RSS3N318 (RSS3N318_D21), the interaction
was disrupted. In vivo ternary complex formation was further
examined using a combination of the BiFC and apFRET assays
(BiFC-apFRET) (Figures 6B and 6C). YFPN -RSS3 N203 and
Os-bHLH094-YFPC were coexpressed in onion epidermal cells,
together with ECFP-fused Os-JAZ9 (ECFP-OsJAZ9). After photobleaching, the YFP fluorophore reconstituted from YFPN-RSS3N203
and OsbHLH094-YFPC, an increase in ECFP-OsJAZ9 signal was
observed in the nucleus (Figures 6B and 6C). By contrast, no signal
increase was detected when YFPN-RSS3N203 and OsbHLH094YFPC were coexpressed with nonfused ECFP. These results
suggest that RSS3, Os-JAZ9, and Os-bHLH094 form a ternary
complex in the nucleus.
RSS3 and JAZ together Repress bHLH094-Mediated
Transcriptional Activation
bHLH factors are known to bind to specific DNA sequences with
a minimal consensus motif, called the E-box (CANNTG, where N
corresponds to any nucleotide) (Atchley and Fitch, 1997). The
strength of the interaction varies with the identity of N and differs
between different bHLH transcription factors. For example,
Arabidopsis MYC2 has high binding affinities for CACGTG (also
called the G-box) and CATATG, but not for CAATTG and
CAGCTG sequences (Godoy et al., 2011). We examined whether
Os-bHLH094 acts on the same DNA sequences as Arabidopsis
MYC2. We constructed LUC reporter genes carrying a triplicate
repeat of the respective E-box sequences fused to the upstream
region of a cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S minimal promoter and cotransformed rice cultured cell protoplasts with these
constructs and bHLH094. As shown in Figure 7A, bHLH094 enhanced the expression of reporters carrying (CACGTG)x3, (CAGCTG)
Figure 6. RSS3, bHLH, and JAZ Form a Ternary Complex.
(A) Yeast three-hybrid assay to verify interaction of RSS3N318, bHLH094,
and JAZ9. Representative results of more than six independent transformants are shown for each combination. D21 represents the 21–amino
acid deletion mimicking rss3 mutation. The control and selective medium
were as described in Figure 5. Media lacking Met (-M) was used for induction of the gene encoding the 3rd protein by MET25 promoter for
testing interaction between the three proteins expressed. “Empty”
means the vector control. 3AT, 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole
(B) and (C) Interaction among JAZ9, RSS3N203, and bHLH094, as analyzed by BiFC-apFRET. Representative images (B) and FRET efficiencies
(C) of apFRET in onion cells using YFPN-RSS3N203, bHLH094-YFPc, and
ECFP-JAZ9 or nonfused ECFP are shown. Pseudocolor images represent fluorescence intensities. Bar = 10 µm. Mean 6 SD; n = 3 (ECFP) and
6 (ECFP-JAZ9). Asterisks indicate P value < 0.05 (Student’s t test).
8 of 17
The Plant Cell
x3,
or (CATATG)x3 but not of those carrying (CAATTG)x3. These results indicate that bHLH094 can activate transcription through
specific E-box sequences. Activation of the promoter carrying
(CAGCTG)x3 may indicate that the binding specificity of OsbHLH094 is different from that of At-MYC2.
To examine the possibility that RSS3 functions as an effector
of bHLH094-dependent transcriptional regulation, RSS3 (driven
by the CaMV 35S promoter) was additionally coexpressed with
bHLH094. However, no significant effect on reporter expression
was observed (Figure 7A). When RSS3 and JAZ9 were coexpressed, bHLH094-dependent activation of the reporter genes
was significantly repressed (Figure 7B). By contrast, this repression was not observed by the expression of JAZ9 alone or
when RSS3 was replaced with RSS3_D21, which encodes the
RSS3 variant with the 21–amino acid deletion as in rss3 (Figure
7B). Together with the finding that RSS3 forms a complex with
JAZ9 and bHLH094, these results indicate that the combined
RSS3-JAZ9 represses the bHLH094-mediated transcriptional
activation, and this regulation is impaired in rss3.
Expression of Salt-Responsive Genes Is Largely Altered
in rss3
To gain further insight into the function of RSS3, we performed
a transcriptomic analysis of the root tip, using a rice 44K microarray. First, we analyzed the relationship between the effects of the
mutant genotype (rss3 mutation) and those of salinity (100 mM
NaCl treatment) using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). As
illustrated in the Venn diagram (Figure 8A), nearly half (49.5%; 3366/
6804) of the genes affected by salinity stress were also affected by
rss3 (bold numbers). These 3366 genes also accounted for half
(48.9%) of the 6884 genes affected by rss3. For most of these 3366
genes, the altered expression in rss3 was observed under either
nonstress or salinity stress conditions, and the salt-responsiveness
of these genes seemed not to be changed between the wild type
and rss3 (Figure 8B). This is reflected by the small proportion of
the interactively affected genes (genotype 3 salinity), the saltresponsiveness of which was modified in rss3 (183/3366; Figure
8A). The proportion of the 183 genes interdependently affected by
salinity and rss3 was also small among the total number of affected
genes (10372; Figure 8A). Similar tendencies were observed when
the differentially expressed genes were further filtered with more
stringent fold-change criteria (>2 or <0.5) (Figure 8A, numbers in
gray, parentheses). These results suggest that RSS3 has global
effects on the salt stress response pathways but does not constitute stress response signaling mechanisms.
A Substantial Proportion of JA-Responsive Genes Are
Activated in rss3
Prompted by the finding that RSS3 forms complexes with JAZ
and bHLH proteins, we explored whether the expression of
JA-responsive genes was affected by rss3 (Figure 8C; see
Supplemental Data Sets 1A and 1B online). For this analysis,
genes that were altered in expression by rss3 were further selected
with a cutoff of 1.5-fold change and with significance evaluated by
rank product (P < 0.01, percentage of false positive [pfp] < 0.05).
JA-responsive genes were selected in the same manner using the
data deposited by Miyamoto et al. (2012) in the Gene Expression
Omnibus of the National Center for Biotechnology Information
(GSE32633). Notably, 20% of 112 JA-inducible genes were upregulated in rss3 under nonstressed conditions (Figure 8C). Similarly, 28% of the JA-inducible genes were upregulated in rss3
under salinity stress. These correspond to approximately an
eightfold (P = 4.5e214, hypergeometric distribution) and 11-fold
(P = 2.1e223, hypergeometric distribution) enrichment, as the
percentage of genes upregulated in rss3 out of the total number of
genes examined in the array was 2.5 and 2.6% under nonstressed
and salinity conditions, respectively. Only a small portion of JAinduced genes was downregulated in rss3 in either nonstressed or
salinity conditions (5 and 2%, respectively). The expression of
genes that are repressed by JA was less significantly affected by
rss3. These results suggest that RSS3 has a role in repressing
a portion but not all of the JA-inducible genes. Among the JAresponsive genes, the expression of which was altered in rss3, we
found no significant biases to certain gene categories with respect
to cellular metabolism and/or molecular function (see Supplemental
Data Set 1C online).
To further evaluate the role of RSS3 in the regulation of JAinducible genes, we examined the expression pattern of several
JA-responsive genes. Wild-type and rss3 seedlings were grown
in a hypotonic culture medium and transferred into the medium
in the presence or absence of 100 mM JA. In the wild-type root
tips, the expression of JAZ7, JAZ8, and SECOLOGANIN SYNTHASE (SLS) was induced by JA within 6 to 16 h (Figure 8D).
The expression levels of these genes after JA treatment were
further increased in rss3 (Figure 8D), indicating that RSS3 has
a role in mediating negative regulation of JA-induced gene
expression. Taken together, our results suggest that the JAZRSS3-bHLH ternary complex regulates the expression of JAresponsive genes in root tips. It is likely that the repressive function
of this complex is due to the JAZ component, as is the case for the
well-known JAZ-MYC2 complex in Arabidopsis (Chini et al., 2007;
Thines et al., 2007).
It is noteworthy that, in the absence of exogenously supplied
JA, the JA-induced genes are upregulated in rss3 in the conditions used for microarray analysis (Figure 8C; see Supplemental
Figure 9A online) but not significantly in the hypotonic culture
conditions (Figure 8D). This suggests that difference in physiological state in the root tip between the experimental setups affects the expression of JA-induced genes. We confirmed that, in
the growth conditions in which root elongation was reduced
in rss3 (Figure 1), the expression levels of the JA-induced genes in
rss3 was considerably higher than those in the wild type grown in
the absence of exogenous JA (see Supplemental Figure 9B online).
Low Levels of JA Inhibit Cell Elongation but Not Cell Division
in the Root Tip
JAs inhibit cell division in the Arabidopsis root tip (Chen et al.,
2011). In Arabidopsis cultured cells, cell cycle arrest at G2 has
been reported for treatment with 50 mM JA (Pauwels et al.,
2008). By contrast, rss3 resulted in reduced cell elongation but
did not affect meristematic activity in the absence of exogenous
JA (Figure 1). To verify the possibility that this reflects the
Control of Root Cell Elongation by RSS3
9 of 17
derepression of JA-responsive genes in rss3, we examined if
treatment of the wild type with low concentrations of JA would
phenocopy the reduced root cell elongation phenotype of rss3.
Even though JA response is provoked in rss3 without JA treatment, it was less than those in wild type grown in the presence
of 1 or 5 mM JA (see Supplemental Figure 9B online). We
therefore expected that these concentrations of JA would inhibit
root cell elongation specifically in EZ in the wild type. In fact,
5 mM JA caused a decrease in the size of the EZ but not of the
MZ in the wild-type root tip, whereas both the MZ and EZ were
reduced in size by 10 mM JA. In the MTZ, a reduction in cell size
was observed even with 5 mM JA (see Supplemental Figures
10A and 10B online).
To explore these concentration-dependent differential effects
of JAs on root tip cells, we monitored the expression levels of
a S-phase marker gene, PCNA, and a M-phase cyclin, CycB2;1.
The expression of CycB2;1 was repressed by 10 mM JA, but not
by 5 mM, while the expression of PCNA was not significantly
changed by JA at either concentration (see Supplemental Figure
10C online). These results further support the above idea that
the effect of rss3 is mimicked by low concentrations of JA.
DISCUSSION
JAs are known to regulate root elongation in a wide variety of
plant species (Corbineau et al., 1988; Creelman and Mullet,
1997; Ulloa et al., 2002; Uppalapati et al., 2005). In this article,
we have shown that RSS3 is a novel regulatory factor of transcription, particularly in the regulation of JA-induced genes, that
controls root cell elongation. RSS3 is expressed predominantly
in the root tip, particularly in the MZ and in the EZ region bordering MZ. The function of RSS3 in transcriptional regulation
was mainly evidenced by the interaction of RSS3 with bHLH094
and bHLH089 in the nucleus. We also demonstrated that RSS3
binds to JAZ9 and JAZ11 and thereby forms a ternary complex
with bHLH094 and JAZ9. It is conceivable that bHLH089 and
JAZ11 also form a similar complex with RSS3, based on their
structural similarities to bHLH094 and JAZ9, respectively. RSS3
is likely to mediate the repression of bHLH factors by JAZ proteins, some of which are proposed to mediate active repression
through NOVEL INTERACTOR OF JAZ (NINJA) and TOPLESS
(TPL) (Pauwels et al., 2010).
We propose that RSS3 represses the expression of JAinduced genes because a portion of JA-responsive genes was
upregulated in the root tip of rss3, and the levels of expression of
Figure 7. RSS3 and JAZ9 together Suppress bHLH094-Mediated Gene
Activation.
(A) bHLH094 enhances the activity of the gene promoter containing
E-box (CANNTG).
(B) A combinational expression of RSS3 and JAZ9 suppresses the
bHLH094-mediated gene activation driven by the promoter containing
G-box (CACGTG). Effector plasmids containing bHLH094, RSS3,
RSS3_D21, and JAZ9 driven by the CaMV 35S promoter were introduced into rice protoplasts, concomitant with a reporter plasmid
containing a triplicate E-box (A) or G-box (B) fused to the basal promoter-fLUC (reporter). fLUC activity was measured and normalized with
that of rLUC. Empty vector was added to equalize the amount of plasmids transfected in each combination. Mean 6 SD; n = 3 to 8. Asterisks
indicate a Student’s t test P value < 0.05 in (A). Statistical differences
were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey posthoc analysis, and different letters indicate significant differences (P value < 0.05)
in (B). fLUC, firefly luciferase; rLUC, renilla luciferase.
[See online article for color version of this figure.]
10 of 17
The Plant Cell
Figure 8. The Expression of Salt- and JA-Responsive Genes Is Altered in rss3.
(A) Venn diagram summarizing the gene expression patterns examined using rice 44K microarrays. Differentially expressed genes based on three
parameters, genotype (wild type versus rss3), salinity (with or without 100 mM NaCl), and interaction (genotype 3 interaction), were categorized by twoway ANOVA (P < 0.01) (bold). The differentially expressed genes were further filtered by fold change criteria ($2 or #0.5) (gray, parentheses). The
numbers of nonredundant genes in each category are indicated. The interaction between genotype and salinity, genes that were interdependently
affected by differences in the genotype and growth conditions.
(B) Heat map views of 3366 nonredundant genes whose expression was altered in rss3 and by salinity in (A). WT, the wild type.
(C) Proportion of JA-responsive genes among upregulated (red) and downregulated (blue) genes in rss3 under nonstressed and high-salinity conditions.
The up- and downregulated genes in rss3 were categorized as described in Methods. The JA-responsive genes were selected using data deposited by
Miyamoto et al. (2012) into the Gene Expression Omnibus of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (GSE32633) with a cutoff of 1.5-fold
upregulation and rank product (P < 0.01, pfp < 0.05). Numbers indicate the amount of nonredundant genes in each category. P values indicate the
hypergeometric distribution significance, evaluating the enrichment of JA-induced genes.
(D) The expression of JAZ7 (top), JAZ8 (middle), and SLS (bottom) after treatment with 100 µM JA or mock treatment, quantified by real-time RT-PCR
analysis. Root tips of 5-d-old seedlings grown in the water were used. Expression levels were normalized by the levels of eEF-1a. The expression levels
relative to those in the wild type before treatment with JA are shown. Statistical differences were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey
posthoc analysis, and different letters indicate significant differences (P value < 0.05). Mean 6 SD; n = 4. SLS, secologanin synthase.
Control of Root Cell Elongation by RSS3
JA-responsive genes were significantly increased in rss3 after
JA treatment. bHLH094 enhanced the transcriptional activation
of promoters carrying specific E-box sequences, but this was
suppressed by the combined expression of RSS3 and JAZ9.
Based on these data, we propose that the bHLH factors and
RSS3 combine with JAZs to negatively regulate JA-responsive
genes (Figure 9). This is reminiscent of the function of Arabidopsis MYC2, a transcriptional activator of JA-induced genes
(Dombrecht et al., 2007). The activity of At-MYC2 is blocked by
the binding of JAZs. Upon JA-Ile perception by COI1, the JAZ is
degraded, which leads to the recovery of the activation function
of At-MYC2 and thereby results in JA-responsive gene induction
(Chini et al., 2007; Thines et al., 2007). Similarly, the binding
of JAZ9 to RSS3-bHLH094 might repress bHLH094-mediated
transcriptional activation. In this scenario, defects in the binding
of RSS3 to bHLH094 in rss3 should release the repression of
bHLH094-mediated gene expression as illustrated in Figure 9.
However, in the rss3 mutant, the JA-induced genes were not
fully activated and were still responsive to exogenous JA (Figure
9, bottom). Moreover, gene induction level by bHLH094 alone in
the reporter assay was moderate. Therefore, it is suggested that,
in conjunction with bHLH089 and bHLH094, other positive regulatory factors are involved in the activation of the JA-responsive
genes (Figure 9, depicted as factor X). Probably, such factors are
themselves activated by JA but regulated independently of RSS3
and its binding JAZs. The action of the factor X may be dependent
on the downstream gene promoter. A possible candidate for such
regulators is a MYB transcription factor. In the case of PAL, for
example, the promoter region contains potential cis-regulatory
sequences for bHLH094 (CAGCTG) and R2R3 MYB factors
(CACCAACC) (Takeda et al., 1999; Sugimoto et al., 2000), respectively. A JA-induced MYB exists in rice (Os11g0684000) (Lee
et al., 2001). Regulation of this MYB seems to be independent of
RSS3 because it was not significantly activated in rss3 in our
microarray data (GSE41442). It is also possible that the activity of
MYB factor(s) in rice is regulated by interaction with several JAZ
proteins, as recently reported in Arabidopsis (Qi et al., 2011).
Another candidate for the factor X can be a different type of bHLH
that is directly repressed by a JAZ factor independently of RSS3.
Importantly, in rss3, JA induces further activation of genes
(Figure 8D). Therefore, RSS3 may have an additional role in repression of the bHLH094/089-mediated gene expression, through
unknown mechanism that is affected by the interaction between
RSS3 and the bHLH factors (Figure 9, bottom right). The elevated
levels of gene expression in rss3 suggest that in the wild type,
RSS3 restricts JA responses in the root tip to a certain extent. In
general, activation of JA signaling in response to unfavorable
conditions causes root growth inhibition (Chacón-López et al.,
2011). Under weak stress conditions, however, there should be
a control to sustain root growth by preventing excessive JA response. RSS3 may function in such regulation in the root tip. By
contrast, JA-induced expression might be fully activated in tissues
other than the root tip, where RSS3 is absent.
Accumulating evidence suggests that JAZ factors, together
with the F-box protein COI1, play central roles in JA signaling
(Pauwels and Goossens, 2011; Kazan and Manners, 2012; Wager
and Browse, 2012). JAs are converted to JA-Ile, which in turn
binds to the COI1-JAZ complex in conjunction with ionositol
11 of 17
Figure 9. Possible Functions of RSS3 and Its Binding Proteins in JAInducible Gene Expression.
RSS3 is proposed to have a role in mediating JAZ-dependent inactivation of genes. Some JAZ factors have been reported to mediate
active repression through NINJA and TPL (Pauwels et al., 2010). It is
unclear whether rice JAZ9 and JAZ11 are involved in active repression or
passive repression. Top left: In the absence of JA (-JA), bHLH094 (or
bHLH089)-mediated transcription is repressed by a combination of
RSS3 and JAZ9 (or JAZ11) proteins that form a trimeric complex with the
bHLH factor. Bottom left: In rss3, this repression was abolished because
RSS3 with the 21–amino acid deletion (RSS3D21) cannot bind to the
bHLH factor. bHLH094 is a weak activator by itself, but the bHLHmediated transcription is readily activated depending on other positive
regulators. Top right: In the presence of JA (+JA), JAZ is possibly degraded by 26S proteasome by the proposed COI1-dependent pathway
(Chini et al., 2007; Thines et al., 2007), leading to derepression of the bHLHmediated transcription. Since RSS3 alone cannot activate bHLH094, another positive regulation (depicted as factor X) is likely involved in the gene
activation by JA. The action of factor X might be dependent on respective
downstream gene promoters. In the wild type (WT), the JA-responsive
genes are active but incompletely (“restricted”). Bottom right: In rss3, JA
induces full activation of genes. This might be achieved by release from
repression through the JAZ, the positive regulation with the factor X, and
additional unknown mechanism that is interfered by interaction of RSS3
with the bHLH factors.
[See online article for color version of this figure.]
pentakiphosphate, which functions as a cofactor (Chini et al.,
2007; Sheard et al., 2010). In JAZ factors, the C-terminal Jas
domain has a crucial role in JA-Ile–dependent binding to COI1
and the subsequent degradation of JAZ by the 26S proteasome
(Chini et al., 2007; Melotto et al., 2008; Sheard et al., 2010). The
strength of association with COI1 differs among JAZs, which
correlates with sequence variation in the Jas domain (Shyu et al.,
2012). The differential association of JAZs with COI1 may enable
plants to respond dynamically to a wide range of JA concentrations. Rice JAZ9 and JAZ11, which interact with RSS3 (Figure
5) and with COI1 in the presence of coronatine (Lee et al., 2013),
also contain the JAZ degron, the core sequence of the Jas domain, but an incomplete PY consensus at the C terminus (see
Supplemental Figure 7B online). The Jas domain of JAZ9 and
JAZ11 likely binds to COI1 and JA-Ile because the amino acids
responsible for complex formation are well conserved in these
JAZ proteins (see Supplemental Figure 8 online). The PY sequence has only a limited effect on the binding to COI1 in vitro
12 of 17
The Plant Cell
(Chini et al., 2007; Chung et al., 2010; Sheard et al., 2010). In
some cases, however, the lack of a sequence including PY
causes changes in the stability of JAZ and affects JA sensitivity in
plants (Chung and Howe, 2009; Chung et al., 2010). Therefore, we
cannot rule out the possibility that JAZ9 and JAZ11 have unique
features that do not occur in canonical JAZ proteins. The complex
that forms between RSS3 and JAZs remains to be characterized
in terms of its affinity for COI1 and its stability in the presence of
JAs.
Previous studies reported that the N terminus of R/B-like
bHLHs functions as a JAZ interacting domain (JID) (Chini et al.,
2007; Fernández-Calvo et al., 2011). Within the JID, the region II
is highly conserved both in RSS3 and in R/B-like bHLHs (Figure
2C). Moreover, a single amino acid substitution (D94N) of ATR2
(Arabidopsis MYC3) in the region II [M/I/V-L(G)W(G)DG-F/Y] resulted in a dominant mutation causing activation of Trp-related
genes and stress-related genes (Smolen et al., 2002). It was
speculated that this is due to a defect of its interaction with JAZ
proteins, possibly leading to release of repression mediated by
JAZs (Fernández-Calvo et al., 2011). Therefore, the region II is
likely the central part of JID. It was also suggested that the first
Gly of the LGWGDG sequence in the region II is important for
binding to JAZ (Fernández-Calvo et al., 2011). This residue is
conserved between JAZ binding MYC2, MYC3, and MYC4 of
Arabidopsis but not its close homolog bHLH028 (At5g46830)
that seems not to bind to JAZ factors (Fernández-Calvo et al.,
2011). Interestingly, RSS3 has Met instead of Gly at this position, but nevertheless is able to bind to JAZ9 and JAZ11. Thus,
variations within its amino acid sequence in the region II as well
as their surrounding sequence may be responsible for the
specificity of binding to respective JAZs.
The rice genome encodes two proteins homologous to RSS3,
RSS3-LIKE1 and RSS3-LIKE2 (see Supplemental Figure 11A
online). When RSS3-LIKE1 was constitutively expressed under
a rice actin promoter in rss3, salt-dependent root growth inhibition
and cell swelling were suppressed (see Supplemental Figures
11C and 11D online). Thus, RSS3 and its homologs possibly
regulate overlapping target genes through members of the classC bHLH factors, including bHLH089 and bHLH094. RSS3-LIKE1
and RSS3-LIKE2 are expressed not only in roots but also in other
organs (see Supplemental Figure 11B online), as are bHLH089
and bHLH094. Therefore, similar regulatory mechanisms may
also operate in tissues other than roots. Conceivably, the same is
true for other plant species because genes homologous to RSS3
and bHLH089, such as Arabidopsis At5G53900 and At1G59640
(BPEp; Szécsi et al., 2006), respectively, are found in the genomes
of other plants. Interestingly, it has been reported that BPEp also
acts downstream of the JA signal and functions as a negative
regulator of cell elongation in petals (Brioudes et al., 2009).
It remains to be clarified which factors downstream of the
RSS3-JAZ-bHLH complex mediate the control of root growth.
To classify the genes whose expression was altered in rss3, we
applied our transcriptomic data for gene set enrichment analysis
using MapMan (Thimm et al., 2004). Among the downregulated
genes in rss3, highly enriched gene categories are related to
abscisic acid–induced and late embryogenesis abundant genes
(see Supplemental Figure 9C online). By contrast, genes upregulated in rss3 were classified into a wide variety of categories
(see Supplemental Figure 9C online). Notably, many of them
were related to cell wall metabolism (categories such as “cell wall
modification,” “b-1,3 glucosidase,” “lignin biosynthesis,” “phenylpropanoids,” and “simple phenols”) (see Supplemental Figure 9C
online). It is plausible that RSS3 regulates the expression of genes
involved in cell wall metabolism, which are required for proper cell
elongation and maturation. In fact, genes encoding enzymes involved in lignin biosynthesis and/or the metabolism of other cell
wall components, such as PAL, COMT, Cellulase, and Peroxidase, are upregulated in rss3 (microarray data: GSE41442) (see
Supplemental Data Set 1D online), which may result in changes in
cell wall properties. This may in turn affect the elongation of rss3
root cells under nonstress conditions and cause further defects
under salinity conditions. In tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) cells, the
physical and chemical structures of the primary cell wall are altered
when the plants are cultured under high-salinity conditions; specifically, the wall exhibits weakened tensile strength, concomitant
with a decrease in cellulose content, compositional changes of the
cell wall–associated proteins, and reorganization of pectin (Iraki
et al., 1989). It is reasonable to assume that RSS3 is involved in the
regulation of genes involved in such processes. This may explain
the impaired flexibility in rss3 roots. Experiments to examine how
rss3 affects cell wall properties are underway.
We demonstrated that RSS3 globally modulates the expression of salinity stress–responsive genes. The link between this
modulation and the RSS3-mediated regulation of JA-responsive
genes remains unclear, although JAs are known to be involved
in various stress responses (Wasternack, 2007; Takeuchi et al.,
2011). Notably, Arabidopsis MYC2 was originally identified as
a transcriptional activator of stress-responsive genes (Abe et al.,
1997). The global effects of rss3 on the stress-responsive genes
may be accounted for by assuming that the target cis-elements
of Arabidopsis MYC2- or rice bHLH89/94-related Transcription
factors prevail in primary stress-responsive genes, including the
upstream transcription factors, and that they variously modulate
the expression levels of the stress-responsive genes. Such
bHLH-mediated controls would contribute to the adaptation of
root growth in response to stress conditions.
In conclusion, we have shown that RSS3 forms a ternary
complex with bHLH and JAZ factors. Moreover, our results indicate that RSS3, possibly through this complex, has an important
role in stress-responsive gene regulation and the control of cell
elongation, providing a novel molecular mechanism by which JAresponsive genes and plant growth are regulated. The RSS3mediated regulation of cell elongation would allow the elaborate
control of root growth in response to environmental stresses and
also be linked to the regulation of cell division in the root tip. A
further understanding of the mechanisms that sustain root growth
under stressful conditions will enhance our understanding of how
plants adapt to environmental changes.
METHODS
Plant Materials and Growth Conditions
The rss3 mutant was originally identified in a screen for salt-dependent
phenotypes (Ogawa et al., 2011) in the rice (Oryza sativa) mutant population prepared by Miyao et al. (2003) (line ND2084). Wild-type and rss3
Control of Root Cell Elongation by RSS3
seeds (O. sativa cv Nipponbare) were surface sterilized and germinated on
solid MS-based medium (Murashige and Skoog basal medium, 1% Suc,
0.25% gellan gum, and 0.05% MES-KOH, pH 5.8) in 13-cm-high capped
bottles. Seedlings were grown at 25°C under a photoperiod of 14 h light
(4000 lux, white light) and 10 h dark for 3 to 7 d. For the salinity stress test,
100 to 150 mM NaCl was applied to the medium. JA [(6)-JA; Wako] was
dissolved in DMSO (Wako) to produce a 100 mM stock solution and
stored at 220°C. For JA treatment of rice seedlings, JA or mock solution
was applied to the solid MS-based medium, except that the short-term
treatment with JA was performed in water.
Microscopy Observation of Root Cells
Root samples were treated with chloral hydrate solution (8 g chloral
hydrate, 1 mL glycerol, and 2 mL water) or stained by the modified
pseudo-Schiff propidium iodide technique (Truernit et al., 2008; Ogawa
et al., 2011). The tissues were observed under a fluorescence microscope
(Axio Imager.MI; Carl Zeiss) or under a confocal laser scanning microscope (FV-1000D; Olympus).
Positional Cloning of the RSS3 Gene
Genetic mapping of rss3 was performed with F2 populations derived from
crosses between rss3 and an indica cultivar, Kasalath. DNA extracted
from 1501 F2 seedlings exhibiting the rss3 phenotype was used to type
subspecies-specific polymorphisms for simple sequence repeat and
cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence marker design (International
Rice Genome Sequence Project, 2005; see Supplemental Table 1 online).
Transcripts of four genes located in the mapped regions, i.e.,
Os11g0446000, Os11g0446500, Os11g0446700, and LOC_Os11g25970
(the first three genes were annotated in the Rice Annotation Project Database and the last in Michigan State University/The Institute for Genomic
Research), were analyzed by RT-PCR. A truncation of Os11g0446000
mRNA was detected in rss3. The causative RSS3 gene was confirmed by
complementation of rss3 using a genomic fragment (7.4 kb) of the wild-type
allele of Os11g0446000. We cloned the RSS3 cDNA fragments by 59- and
39-rapid amplification of cDNA ends using GeneRacer (Invitrogen) and
amplified the cDNA encoding the full-length RSS3 amino acid sequence.
Sequence Alignment and Phylogenic Analysis
Alignment of the amino acid sequences was performed using MAFFT
software (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software/) with the G-INS-I strategy
and/or the MUSCLE algorithm from MEGA5.0 (http://www.megasoftware.
net/). To generate the graphical output, the sequences listed in Supplemental
Data Set 2, TreeView (Page, 1996) and Genedoc (http://www.nrbsc.org/gfx/
genedoc/) were used.
Plasmid Construction
A 7.4-kb genomic fragment of RSS3 (4.0 kb of coding region, 2.5 kb of the
upstream promoter region, and 0.9 kb of the downstream region) was
amplified by PCR with the specific primers 59-TCGAGGCTGACGAATGCAGCCG-39 and 59-AGGCTTAAAGATTCGTCTCGCAG-39 and
inserted into pCR-Blunt II-TOPO (Invitrogen). The fragment containing
ProRSS3:RSS3 was excised with XbaI and KpnI, inserted between XbaI
and KpnI sites of the binary vector pCAMBIA1301 (CAMBIA), and then
used for transformation of rss3 for the complementation assay. Furthermore, the plasmid was modified to construct ProRSS3:RSS3-EGFP.
Briefly, the stop codon (TAG) of RSS3 was substituted into a codon (TCG)
followed by an EcoRI-BamHI linker sequence. The EGFP gene fragment,
derived from ProAct:EGFP (Ogawa et al., 2011), was then inserted between the EcoRI and BamHI sites. The resulting ProRSS3:RSS3-EGFP
13 of 17
fusion gene, containing an amino acid junction sequence (Ser-Glu-PheAla-Ala-Ala-Ser-Thr) between RSS3 and EGFP, was inserted between
XbaI and KpnI sites of the binary vector pPZP2H-lac (Fuse et al., 2001).
The binary plasmid constructs were used for Agrobacterium tumefaciens–
mediated transformation. Introduction of the ProRSS3:RSS3-EGFP fusion gene into the rss3 mutant complemented the severely impaired root
growth phenotype under salinity conditions.
For transient assays using rice protoplasts, cDNAs encoding RSS3,
bHLH094, and JAZ9 were amplified by PCR with specific primer sets (see
Supplemental Table 1 online) and subcloned into the pENTR/D-TOPO
vector. These genes were then transferred using the LR recombination
reaction (Gateway technology; Invitrogen) into a vector containing 35S:
ShD:GW:stop (courtesy of Hirokazu Kato, Nagoya University), which
consists of the CaMV 35S promoter, the first intron of maize (Zea mays)
Sh1 with an internal deletion, the Gateway cassette, stop codons in three
frames, and a nopaline synthase terminator. For constructing the reporter
plasmid containing E-box:TATA:fLUC (E-box repeats fused to the CaMV
35S minimal promoter and firefly LUC), the GAL4 binding sequence (UAS)
of the UAS:TATA:fLUC plasmid (courtesy of Yutaka Sato, Nagoya University)
was replaced with an artificial enhancer sequence that contains the triplicate of
the E-box regulatory sequence (underlined), 59-GGATCCTGGCAAGCANNTGAAGCANNTGAAGCANNTGAAGGGATCC-39.
For construction of YFPN-RSS3 and Os-bHLH094-YFPC driven by the
CaMV 35S promoter, cDNAs for RSS3 and bHLH094 subcloned in the
pENTR/D-TOPO vector were transferred to Gateway expression vectors
(nYFP/pUGW0 and cYFP/pUGW2) by LR recombination. The pDH51mRFP1 plasmid (Zhong et al., 2008) was used as a control for the BiFC
assay. For fluorescence observation and the apFRET assay, cDNAs encoding RSS3, class-C bHLHs, and JAZs were subcloned into the pENTR/
D-TOPO vector and transferred to Gateway expression vectors (YFP/pUGW0,
pDH51-GW-CFP, and ECFP/pUGW0) (Nakagawa et al., 2007; Zhong et al.,
2008). Primer sets used for cDNA amplification are listed in Supplemental
Table 1 online.
Y2H and Three-Hybrid Assay
Transformation of yeast (AH109) and the interaction assays were performed using Matchmaker Library Construction and Screening Kits
(Clontech) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Summary of
screening of RSS3 binding proteins are described in Supplemental Table
2 online. Fragments of cDNA encoding RSS3, bHLH094, and JAZs were
amplified by PCR with the primer sets listed in Supplemental Table 1
online. These cDNAs were derived from mRNA expressed in the root tip,
except for JAZ12, which was from whole seedlings. Among the 15 JAZ
genes reported by Ye et al. (2009), cDNAs for 12 JAZ genes other than
JAZ5, JAZ13, and JAZ14 were amplified. Amplicons were either cloned into
the NdeI and EcoRI site of pGBKT7 or introduced by homologous recombination into pGADT7-Rec. For the yeast three-hybrid assay, RSS3 and
bHLH094 were amplified by PCR and cloned into the NotI site or EcoRI and
BamHI sites of pBRIDGE (Clontech).
For screening of RSS3 interactors, rice cDNA libraries derived from
root tissues of 7-d-old seedlings were amplified and cloned into the prey
vector pGADT7-Rec in yeast. Using the N-terminal 318 amino acids of
RSS3 as bait, a total of 7.2 3 106 clones were screened based on the
activation of the HIS3 reporter gene. The 336 candidate clones were
further selected by activation of the ADE2 and MEL1 reporter genes,
resulting in 333 clones. Within the 40 high MEL1 expressing clones, nine
candidate clones were selected by their reading frame and repeated
reporter assay after retransformation of the respective plasmids (listed in
Supplemental Table 2 online). For four candidate clones that carried
transcription factors genes, the dependency of the bait plasmid was
examined. As a result, only one clone was selected, which had a gene
fragment for a DNA binding protein (Os07g0193800; bHLH094). By
screening another cDNA library, derived from the root tips of rice
14 of 17
The Plant Cell
seedlings grown under salinity conditions (9.9 3 105 clones), using the
N-terminal 203 amino acids of RSS3 as bait, no positive clones were
obtained after further selection.
Expression Analysis
Total RNA was extracted and purified using the RNeasy Mini Kit or RNeasy
Micro Kit (Qiagen). Reverse transcription was performed using the QuantiTect Rev transcription kit (Qiagen). First-strand cDNA was amplified by PCR
PrimeStar HS DNA polymerase (Takara) using the GeneAmp PCR System
9700 (Applied Biosystems) or by real-time PCR with Power SYBR Green
PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems) using Mx3000P (Agilent). The primer
sets are listed in Supplemental Table 1 online. The quantified expression
levels of the tested genes were normalized against those of UBQ, 25S rRNA,
or eEF1-a (Jain et al., 2006).
Transient Expression Assay Using Rice Protoplasts
Electroporation of rice cultured cell–derived protoplasts was performed
as described previously (Hattori et al., 1995). Ten micrograms of each
plasmid was used for each electroporation, with 5 mg of a reference
plasmid encoding renilla LUC driven under a CaMV 35S promoter used for
normalization. The activity of firefly and renilla luciferase was monitored
by a luminometer (Lumat LB 9507; Berthold Technologies) using the
PicaGene Dual Sea Pansy Luminescence Kit (Toyo-Ink). Each experiment was repeated at least three times using a single preparation of
protoplasts.
BiFC, apFRET, and BiFC-apFRET Analysis
To evaluate the protein–protein interaction by BiFC, apFRET, or BiFCapFRET analysis, transient assays were performed by particle
bombardment using the PDS-1000/He biolistic particle delivery system
(Bio-Rad). Plasmids encoding the protein of interest were adsorbed onto
gold particles (1.6 mm in diameter) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Bio-Rad). Gold particles were then bombarded into onion
pieces at 7584 kPa under a vacuum of 94.82 kPa. The onion pieces were
then incubated in a Petri dish for 12 h at 30°C in the dark. Epidermal cells
were observed by fluorescence microscopy (Axio Imager.M1; Carl Zeiss).
The nuclei of onion epidermal cells expressing the proteins of interest
were subjected to apFRET and BiFC-apFRET analyses using a confocal
laser scanning microscope (LSM700; Carl Zeiss). ECFP or CFP was used
as the FRET donor, and YFP or BiFC-derived YFP was used as the FRET
acceptor. After bleaching the acceptor, FRET was monitored as an increase of donor fluorescence. Calculation of the FRET efficiency used the
formula (donor intensitypostbleach 2 donor intensityprebleach) 3 100/donor
intensitypostbleach.
Microarray and Statistical Analysis
For transcriptomic analysis, total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy
Mini Kit (Qiagen) from root tips (1 mm long) excised from wild-type and
rss3 seedlings that had grown for 3 d on the solid MS medium in the
presence (+NaCl) or absence (2NaCl) of 100 mM NaCl. The excised root
tips include the MZ and EZ, but not the MTZ, even in rss3 plants grown
under salinity stress. Three biological replicates, each of which consisted
of at least 15 individual root tips, were prepared. The quality and quantity
of RNAs were evaluated using a NanoDrop ND-1000 UV-VIS spectrophotometer (NanoDrop) and Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent Technology). The RNAs were labeled with a LOW RNA input linear amplification/
labeling kit (Agilent Technology). Four different aliquots (WT[2NaCl], WT
[+NaCl], rss3[2NaCl], and rss3[+NaCl]) of Cy5-labeled cRNA (825 ng) and
a control aliquot (WT[2NaCl]) of Cy3-labeled cRNA (825 ng) were prepared and used for hybridization using the Agilent-015241 rice gene
expression 4X44K microarray (Agilent Technology). Scanned images
were analyzed with Feature Extraction Software v10.5.1.1 (Agilent). Microarray data were normalized using the variance stabilization normalization method (Huber et al., 2002) packaged in R software (http://www.
r-project.org/). After normalization, the relative log2 expression values of
the genes in each sample were calculated by subtracting the Cy-3 value
from the Cy-5 value. Differentially expressed genes were categorized
using two-way ANOVA (P < 0.01) by genotype (the wild type versus rss3)
and stress treatment (2NaCl versus +NaCl) with TIGR Multi-Experiment
Viewer (http://www.tm4.org/mev/), where the P value was adjusted with
multiple testing corrections (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). Alternatively, differentially expressed genes were selected by a cutoff of 1.5-fold
change and by rank product (P < 0.01, pfp < 0.05) (Breitling et al., 2004) of
R, to examine the effect of rss3 on the JA-responsive genes. Relative log2
expressions were Z-scaled and visualized with R and Multi-Experiment
Viewer, respectively. Functional categorization of genes was performed,
based on the classification available in the MapMan program (http://
mapman.gabipd.org/) (Thimm et al., 2004). The raw and processed microarray data are available at the Gene Expression Omnibus with repository number GSE41442.
For extraction of the JA-induced or JA-repressed genes, the microarray data by Miyamoto et al. (2012) were also normalized using the
variance stabilization normalization method and filtered by a cutoff of 1.5fold change and by rank product (P < 0.01, pfp < 0.05).
Accession Numbers
Sequence data from this article can be found in GenBank/EMBL databases
under the accession numbers listed in Supplemental Table 3 online. The
newly obtained cDNA sequence of Os11g0446000 encoding full-length
RSS3 was deposited to GenBank under accession number AB753860.
Supplemental Data
Supplemental Figure 1. rss3 Displays Defects in Root Growth.
Supplemental Figure 2. rss3 Displays Aberrant Cellular Arrangement
in the MZ.
Supplemental Figure 3. Responsiveness of rss3 to External Stimuli.
Supplemental Figure 4. Complementation Assay of the rss3 Mutant,
Diagrammatic Representation of the rss3 Mutation, and Expression
Levels of RSS3 in rss3.
Supplemental Figure 5. Expression Pattern of RSS3, bHLH089,
bHLH094, JAZ9, and JAZ11 in Wild-Type Plants.
Supplemental Figure 6. Sequence Alignment of the RSS3 Interaction
Domain of bHLH094, bHLH089, and Class-C bHLH Proteins in Rice.
Supplemental Figure 7. Comparison of the ZIM and Jas Domains of
Rice and Arabidopsis JAZ Proteins.
Supplemental Figure 8. Comparison of the Amino Acid Residues of
JAZ Proteins Required for the Interaction with COI1 and JA-Ile.
Supplemental Figure 9. Altered Expression of Genes in rss3.
Supplemental Figure 10. Dose-Dependent Effects of JA on Cell
Division and Cell Elongation in the Root Tip of Rice.
Supplemental Figure 11. Characterization of RSS3 Homologs of
Rice.
Supplemental Table 1. Oligonucleotides Used in This Study.
Supplemental Table 2. Summary of the Yeast Two-Hybrid Screen.
Supplemental Table 3. Accession Numbers of Genes and Proteins.
Supplemental Data Set 1A. Expression Analysis of JA-Induced
Genes in rss3.
Control of Root Cell Elongation by RSS3
Supplemental Data Set 1B. Expression Analysis of JA-Repressed
Genes in rss3.
Supplemental Data Set 1C. Functional Characterization of Genes
Whose Expression Was Altered by JA and in rss3.
Supplemental Data Set 1D. Lists of the Categorized Genes Whose
Expression Was Altered in rss3.
Supplemental Data Set 2. Sequence Alignments Used for Phylogenetic Analysis in This Study.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Tokunori Hobo, Yuka Kitomi, and Yoshiaki Inukai for experimental suggestions, Taisuke Nishimura, Chiharu Ueguchi, Moez Hanin,
and Hironaka Tsukagoshi for helpful discussions, Masahiro Yano for
generous support on genetic mapping, Ritsuko Motoyama and Yoshiaki
Nagamura for help with the microarray analyses, Miyuki Hattori and
Shukushin Endo for technical assistance, and Tomoko Tsuchida-Mayama,
Masaru Ohme-Takagi, and Hiroaki Ichikawa for helpful comments on the
article. We thank Miyako Ueguchi-Tanaka for guidance with the particle
bombardment experiments. We also thank Tsuyoshi Nakagawa and Shyoji
Mano for providing nYFP or cYFP inserted into pUGW0 or pUGW2 vectors,
Yutaka Sato for 35S:rLUC and UAS:TATA:fLUC, H. Kato for 35S:ShD:GW:
stop, and the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre for pDH51-mRFP1
and pDH-GW-CFP. This work was supported in part by grants from the
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (integrated
research project for plants, insects, and animals using genome technology
MP-2146 and IP-5002; Genomics for Agricultural Innovation AMR0002 and
AMR0004) and from the Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement
Institute of Japan and by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
KAKENHI (24580493 and 21.5771). D.O. was supported by a fellowship of
the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
H.H., T.H., and S.T. designed the research. Y.T., M.T., D.O., K.K., K.-I.K.,
Y.H., T.A., K.S., N.M., E.K., K.A., and A.M. performed the research. Y.T.,
T.H., and S.T. wrote the article.
Received March 28, 2013; revised April 20, 2013; accepted April 28,
2013; published May 28, 2013.
REFERENCES
Abe, H., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., Urao, T., Iwasaki, T., Hosokawa, D.,
and Shinozaki, K. (1997). Role of Arabidopsis MYC and MYB homologs
in drought- and abscisic acid-regulated gene expression. Plant Cell 9:
1859–1868.
Atchley, W.R., and Fitch, W.M. (1997). A natural classification of the
basic helix-loop-helix class of transcription factors. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 94: 5172–5176.
Benjamini, Y., and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery
rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat.
Soc. B 57: 289–300.
Breitling, R., Armengaud, P., Amtmann, A., and Herzyk, P. (2004).
Rank products: A simple, yet powerful, new method to detect differentially
regulated genes in replicated microarray experiments. FEBS Lett. 573:
83–92.
15 of 17
Brioudes, F., Joly, C., Szécsi, J., Varaud, E., Leroux, J., Bellvert, F.,
Bertrand, C., and Bendahmane, M. (2009). Jasmonate controls late
development stages of petal growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J.
60: 1070–1080.
Chacón-López, A., Ibarra-Laclette, E., Sánchez-Calderón, L., GutiérrezAlanis, D., and Herrera-Estrella, L. (2011). Global expression pattern
comparison between low phosphorus insensitive 4 and WT Arabidopsis
reveals an important role of reactive oxygen species and jasmonic acid in
the root tip response to phosphate starvation. Plant Signal. Behav. 6:
382–392.
Chen, Q., et al. (2011). The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor
MYC2 directly represses PLETHORA expression during jasmonatemediated modulation of the root stem cell niche in Arabidopsis.
Plant Cell 23: 3335–3352.
Cheng, Z., Sun, L., Qi, T., Zhang, B., Peng, W., Liu, Y., and Xie, D.
(2011). The bHLH transcription factor MYC3 interacts with the
jasmonate ZIM-domain proteins to mediate jasmonate response in
Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 4: 279–288.
Chini, A., Fonseca, S., Fernández, G., Adie, B., Chico, J.M., Lorenzo, O.,
García-Casado, G., López-Vidriero, I., Lozano, F.M., Ponce, M.R.,
Micol, J.L., and Solano, R. (2007). The JAZ family of repressors is the
missing link in jasmonate signalling. Nature 448: 666–671.
Chung, H.S., Cooke, T.F., Depew, C.L., Patel, L.C., Ogawa, N.,
Kobayashi, Y., and Howe, G.A. (2010). Alternative splicing expands the
repertoire of dominant JAZ repressors of jasmonate signaling. Plant J.
63: 613–622.
Chung, H.S., and Howe, G.A. (2009). A critical role for the TIFY motif
in repression of jasmonate signaling by a stabilized splice variant of
the JASMONATE ZIM-domain protein JAZ10 in Arabidopsis. Plant
Cell 21: 131–145.
Corbineau, F., Rudnicki, R.M., and Côme, D. (1988). The effects of
methyl jasmonate on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seed germination
and seedling development. Plant Growth Regul. 7: 157–169.
Creelman, R.A., and Mullet, J.E. (1997). Biosynthesis and action of
jasmonates in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 355–381.
Dombrecht, B., Xue, G.P., Sprague, S.J., Kirkegaard, J.A., Ross, J.J.,
Reid, J.B., Fitt, G.P., Sewelam, N., Schenk, P.M., Manners, J.M., and
Kazan, K. (2007). MYC2 differentially modulates diverse jasmonatedependent functions in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19: 2225–2245.
Fernández-Calvo, P., et al. (2011). The Arabidopsis bHLH transcription
factors MYC3 and MYC4 are targets of JAZ repressors and act additively
with MYC2 in the activation of jasmonate responses. Plant Cell 23:
701–715.
Fuse, T., Sasaki, T., and Yano, M. (2001). Ti-plasmid vectors useful
for functional analysis of rice genes. Plant Biotechnol. 18: 219–222.
Godoy, M., Franco-Zorrilla, J.M., Pérez-Pérez, J., Oliveros, J.C., Lorenzo,
Ó., and Solano, R. (2011). Improved protein-binding microarrays for the
identification of DNA-binding specificities of transcription factors. Plant J.
66: 700–711.
Hattori, T., Terada, T., and Hamasuna, S. (1995). Regulation of the
Osem gene by abscisic acid and the transcriptional activator VP1:
Analysis of cis-acting promoter elements required for regulation by
abscisic acid and VP1. Plant J. 7: 913–925.
Huber, W., von Heydebreck, A., Sültmann, H., Poustka, A., and
Vingron, M. (2002). Variance stabilization applied to microarray
data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression.
Bioinformatics 18 (suppl. 1): S96–S104.
International Rice Genome Sequencing Project (2005). The mapbased sequence of the rice genome. Nature 436: 793–800.
Iraki, N.M., Singh, N., Bressan, R.A., and Carpita, N.C. (1989). Cell
walls of tobacco cells and changes in composition associated with
reduced growth upon adaptation to water and saline stress. Plant
Physiol. 91: 48–53.
16 of 17
The Plant Cell
Jain, M., Nijhawan, A., Tyagi, A.K., and Khurana, J.P. (2006).
Validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for studying
gene expression in rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 345: 646–651.
Kaneyasu, T., Kobayashi, A., Nakayama, M., Fujii, N., Takahashi,
H., and Miyazawa, Y. (2007). Auxin response, but not its polar
transport, plays a role in hydrotropism of Arabidopsis roots. J. Exp.
Bot. 58: 1143–1150.
Kazan, K., and Manners, J.M. (2012). JAZ repressors and the
orchestration of phytohormone crosstalk. Trends Plant Sci. 17:
22–31.
Kiss, J.Z., Miller, K.M., Ogden, L.A., and Roth, K.K. (2002). Phototropism
and gravitropism in lateral roots of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 43:
35–43.
Kiss, J.Z., Mullen, J.L., Correll, M.J., and Hangarter, R.P. (2003).
Phytochromes A and B mediate red-light-induced positive phototropism
in roots. Plant Physiol. 131: 1411–1417.
Kobayashi, A., Takahashi, A., Kakimoto, Y., Miyazawa, Y., Fujii, N.,
Higashitani, A., and Takahashi, H. (2007). A gene essential for
hydrotropism in roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 4724–4729.
Lee, H.Y., Seo, J.S., Cho, J.H., Jung, H., Kim, J.K., Lee, J.S., Rhee,
S., and Do Choi, Y. (2013). Oryza sativa COI homologues restore
jasmonate signal transduction in Arabidopsis coi1-1 mutants. PLoS
ONE 8: e52802.
Lee, M.W., Qi, M., and Yang, Y. (2001). A novel jasmonic acidinducible rice myb gene associates with fungal infection and host
cell death. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 14: 527–535.
Li, X., et al. (2006). Genome-wide analysis of basic/helix-loop-helix
transcription factor family in rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.
141: 1167–1184.
Lorenzo, O., Chico, J.M., Sánchez-Serrano, J.J., and Solano, R.
(2004). JASMONATE-INSENSITIVE1 encodes a MYC transcription
factor essential to discriminate between different jasmonate-regulated
defense responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 16: 1938–1950.
Melotto, M., Mecey, C., Niu, Y., Chung, H.S., Katsir, L., Yao, J.,
Zeng, W., Thines, B., Staswick, P., Browse, J., Howe, G.A., and
He, S.Y. (2008). A critical role of two positively charged amino acids
in the Jas motif of Arabidopsis JAZ proteins in mediating coronatineand jasmonoyl isoleucine-dependent interactions with the COI1 F-box
protein. Plant J. 55: 979–988.
Miyamoto, K., Shimizu, T., Lin, F., Sainsbury, F., Thuenemann, E.,
Lomonossoff, G., Nojiri, H., Yamane, H., and Okada, K. (2012).
Identification of an E-box motif responsible for the expression of
jasmonic acid-induced chitinase gene OsChia4a in rice. J. Plant
Physiol. 169: 621–627.
Miyao, A., Tanaka, K., Murata, K., Sawaki, H., Takeda, S., Abe, K.,
Shinozuka, Y., Onosato, K., and Hirochika, H. (2003). Target site
specificity of the Tos17 retrotransposon shows a preference for insertion
within genes and against insertion in retrotransposon-rich regions of the
genome. Plant Cell 15: 1771–1780.
Nakagawa, T., Kurose, T., Hino, T., Tanaka, K., Kawamukai, M.,
Niwa, Y., Toyooka, K., Matsuoka, K., Jinbo, T., and Kimura, T.
(2007). Development of series of gateway binary vectors, pGWBs,
for realizing efficient construction of fusion genes for plant transformation.
J. Biosci. Bioeng. 104: 34–41.
Niu, Y., Figueroa, P., and Browse, J. (2011). Characterization of JAZinteracting bHLH transcription factors that regulate jasmonate responses
in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 62: 2143–2154.
Ogawa, D., et al. (2011). RSS1 regulates the cell cycle and maintains
meristematic activity under stress conditions in rice. Nat. Commun.
2: 278.
Page, R.D. (1996). TreeView: An application to display phylogenetic
trees on personal computers. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12: 357–358.
Pauwels, L., et al. (2010). NINJA connects the co-repressor
TOPLESS to jasmonate signalling. Nature 464: 788–791.
Pauwels, L., and Goossens, A. (2011). The JAZ proteins: A crucial
interface in the jasmonate signaling cascade. Plant Cell 23: 3089–
3100.
Pauwels, L., Morreel, K., De Witte, E., Lammertyn, F., Van
Montagu, M., Boerjan, W., Inzé, D., and Goossens, A. (2008).
Mapping methyl jasmonate-mediated transcriptional reprogramming of
metabolism and cell cycle progression in cultured Arabidopsis cells. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 1380–1385.
Qi, T., Song, S., Ren, Q., Wu, D., Huang, H., Chen, Y., Fan, M., Peng,
W., Ren, C., and Xie, D. (2011). The Jasmonate-ZIM-domain
proteins interact with the WD-Repeat/bHLH/MYB complexes to
regulate jasmonate-mediated anthocyanin accumulation and trichome
initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 23: 1795–1814.
Qin, F., Shinozaki, K., and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2011).
Achievements and challenges in understanding plant abiotic stress
responses and tolerance. Plant Cell Physiol. 52: 1569–1582.
Seo, J.S., Joo, J., Kim, M.J., Kim, Y.K., Nahm, B.H., Song, S.I., Cheong,
J.J., Lee, J.S., Kim, J.K., and Choi, Y.D. (2011). OsbHLH148, a basic
helix-loop-helix protein, interacts with OsJAZ proteins in a jasmonate
signaling pathway leading to drought tolerance in rice. Plant J. 65:
907–921.
Sheard, L.B., et al. (2010). Jasmonate perception by inositol-phosphatepotentiated COI1-JAZ co-receptor. Nature 468: 400–405.
Shyu, C., Figueroa, P., Depew, C.L., Cooke, T.F., Sheard, L.B.,
Moreno, J.E., Katsir, L., Zheng, N., Browse, J., and Howe, G.A.
(2012). JAZ8 lacks a canonical degron and has an EAR motif that
mediates transcriptional repression of jasmonate responses in
Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24: 536–550.
Smolen, G.A., Pawlowski, L., Wilensky, S.E., and Bender, J. (2002).
Dominant alleles of the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor
ATR2 activate stress-responsive genes in Arabidopsis. Genetics
161: 1235–1246.
Sugimoto, K., Takeda, S., and Hirochika, H. (2000). MYB-related
transcription factor NtMYB2 induced by wounding and elicitors is
a regulator of the tobacco retrotransposon Tto1 and defenserelated genes. Plant Cell 12: 2511–2528.
Svistoonoff, S., Creff, A., Reymond, M., Sigoillot-Claude, C.,
Ricaud, L., Blanchet, A., Nussaume, L., and Desnos, T. (2007).
Root tip contact with low-phosphate media reprograms plant root
architecture. Nat. Genet. 39: 792–796.
Swarup, R., Kramer, E.M., Perry, P., Knox, K., Leyser, H.M.O.,
Haseloff, J., Beemster, G.T.S., Bhalerao, R., and Bennett, M.J.
(2005). Root gravitropism requires lateral root cap and epidermal
cells for transport and response to a mobile auxin signal. Nat. Cell
Biol. 7: 1057–1065.
Szécsi, J., Joly, C., Bordji, K., Varaud, E., Cock, J.M., Dumas, C.,
and Bendahmane, M. (2006). BIGPETALp, a bHLH transcription
factor is involved in the control of Arabidopsis petal size. EMBO J.
25: 3912–3920.
Takeda, S., and Matsuoka, M. (2008). Genetic approaches to crop
improvement: Responding to environmental and population changes.
Nat. Rev. Genet. 9: 444–457.
Takeda, S., Sugimoto, K., Otsuki, H., and Hirochika, H. (1999). A
13-bp cis-regulatory element in the LTR promoter of the tobacco
retrotransposon Tto1 is involved in responsiveness to tissue
culture, wounding, methyl jasmonate and fungal elicitors. Plant J.
18: 383–393.
Takeuchi, K., et al. (2011). RSOsPR10 expression in response to
environmental stresses is regulated antagonistically by jasmonate/
ethylene and salicylic acid signaling pathways in rice roots. Plant
Cell Physiol. 52: 1686–1696.
Control of Root Cell Elongation by RSS3
Thimm, O., Bläsing, O., Gibon, Y., Nagel, A., Meyer, S., Krüger, P.,
Selbig, J., Müller, L.A., Rhee, S.Y., and Stitt, M. (2004). MAPMAN:
A user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of
metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J. 37: 914–939.
Thines, B., Katsir, L., Melotto, M., Niu, Y., Mandaokar, A., Liu, G.,
Nomura, K., He, S.Y., Howe, G.A., and Browse, J. (2007). JAZ
repressor proteins are targets of the SCF(COI1) complex during
jasmonate signalling. Nature 448: 661–665.
Truernit, E., Bauby, H., Dubreucq, B., Grandjean, O., Runions, J.,
Barthélémy, J., and Palauqui, J.C. (2008). High-resolution wholemount imaging of three-dimensional tissue organization and gene
expression enables the study of phloem development and structure
in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20: 1494–1503.
Ulloa, R.M., Raíces, M., MacIntosh, G.C., Maldonado, S., and
Téllez-Iñón, M.T. (2002). Jasmonic acid affects plant morphology
and calcium-dependent protein kinase expression and activity in
Solanum tuberosum. Physiol. Plant. 115: 417–427.
Uppalapati, S.R., Ayoubi, P., Weng, H., Palmer, D.A., Mitchell, R.E.,
Jones, W., and Bender, C.L. (2005). The phytotoxin coronatine and
17 of 17
methyl jasmonate impact multiple phytohormone pathways in
tomato. Plant J. 42: 201–217.
Wager, A., and Browse, J. (2012). Social Network: JAZ protein
interactions expand our knowledge of jasmonate signaling. Front.
Plant Sci. 3: 41.
Wasternack, C. (2007). Jasmonates: An update on biosynthesis,
signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and
development. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 100: 681–697.
Yamaguchi, T., and Blumwald, E. (2005). Developing salt-tolerant
crop plants: Challenges and opportunities. Trends Plant Sci. 10:
615–620.
Ye, H., Du, H., Tang, N., Li, X., and Xiong, L. (2009). Identification
and expression profiling analysis of TIFY family genes involved in
stress and phytohormone responses in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 71:
291–305.
Zhong, S., Lin, Z., Fray, R.G., and Grierson, D. (2008). Improved
plant transformation vectors for fluorescent protein tagging.
Transgenic Res. 17: 985–989.
Zhu, J.K. (2001). Plant salt tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 6: 66–71.
RICE SALT SENSITIVE3 Forms a Ternary Complex with JAZ and Class-C bHLH Factors and
Regulates Jasmonate-Induced Gene Expression and Root Cell Elongation
Yosuke Toda, Maiko Tanaka, Daisuke Ogawa, Kyo Kurata, Ken-ichi Kurotani, Yoshiki Habu, Tsuyu
Ando, Kazuhiko Sugimoto, Nobutaka Mitsuda, Etsuko Katoh, Kiyomi Abe, Akio Miyao, Hirohiko
Hirochika, Tsukaho Hattori and Shin Takeda
Plant Cell; originally published online May 28, 2013;
DOI 10.1105/tpc.113.112052
This information is current as of June 17, 2017
Supplemental Data
/content/suppl/2013/05/09/tpc.113.112052.DC1.html
Permissions
https://www.copyright.com/ccc/openurl.do?sid=pd_hw1532298X&issn=1532298X&WT.mc_id=pd_hw1532298X
eTOCs
Sign up for eTOCs at:
http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain
CiteTrack Alerts
Sign up for CiteTrack Alerts at:
http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain
Subscription Information
Subscription Information for The Plant Cell and Plant Physiology is available at:
http://www.aspb.org/publications/subscriptions.cfm
© American Society of Plant Biologists
ADVANCING THE SCIENCE OF PLANT BIOLOGY