Journal of the Geological Society, London, Vol. 158, 2001, pp. 151–162. Printed in Great Britain. Sedimentology of the Indus Group, Ladakh, northern India: implications for the timing of initiation of the palaeo-Indus River 1 H. D. SINCLAIR 1 & N. JAFFEY 1 Department of Geology and Geophysics, Grant Institute, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JY UK (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: The upper reaches of the Indus River form a longitudinal network that drains a large portion of the western Himalaya. It plays an important role as a sediment routing system, feeding the Indus Delta and submarine fan, and has played a controlling role in the denudational history of the western Himalaya. Given the rivers long-term significance, its timing of initiation remains poorly constrained. The facies, palaeocurrents and provenance of the post-early Eocene Indus Group preserved along the upper reaches of the modern Indus reveal a history of fluvial/deltaic and deep-water sedimentation in an intermontane basin dominated by internal drainage. Hence, the Indus Group is not considered to represent the deposits of a palaeo-Indus River as previously thought. Illite crystallinity values and apatite fission track dating of the Indus Group suggest that the succession was buried to temperatures of 155–280C, and that unroofing started in early Miocene times and proceeded at 0.1–0.4 mm a1 to the present. The youngest sedimentary rocks preserved along the Indus Basin are early Miocene in age from the tectonostratigraphically equivalent deposits around Kargil to the west of the study area. The transition from sediment accumulation to erosional unroofing in early Miocene times coincides with accelerated regional unroofing of the High Himalayas to the south, and the initiation of the Indus Delta/submarine fan to the west. Differential uplift between the northward thrusting of the Zanskar and Indus sedimentary succession against the undeformed Ladakh Batholith provides a mechanism for post-early Miocene initiation of a major longitudinal river. Hence, early Miocene times is believed to represent the earliest possible age of initiation of the palaeo-Indus river following this course. Keywords: Indus, Himalayas, Ladakh, molasse, intermontane basins. The Indus Basin of Ladakh, northern India, records a history of sedimentation along the Indus Suture Zone that spans accumulation in a fore-arc basin prior to collision, and an intermontane basin post-collision (i.e., from Early Palaeocene to Miocene times; Garzanti & Van Haver 1988; Searle et al. 1990). The younger, fluvially dominated sedimentary succession termed the Indus Group are preserved along the presentday course of the Indus River, and have been cited as evidence for a long-lived, antecedent history of development of the Indus system along this route (Searle 1996; Qayyum et al. 1997; Friend 1998; Clift et al. 2000). New facies and palaeocurrent data from the Indus Group are presented in order to evaluate this proposal. The modern Indus River represents one of the major rivers of the world, with the seventh highest sediment discharge of 291 Mt a1 from its river mouth (Milliman & Meade 1983; Hovius 1998). It is sourced from the southern margin of Tibet in the region of Mount Kailas, from where it flows westnorthwestward, for approximately 880 km along the strike of the mountain belt (Fig. 1). It initially follows the Indus–Tsangpo continental suture zone, then traverses the Ladakh batholith, finally heading south, cutting through the Himalayan mountain belt around the Nanga Parbat Massif (Fig. 1). This distance of longitudinal flow is second only to the Yarlung/Tsangpo river which follows a similar tectono-geomorphic route to the eastern syntaxis of the Himalaya before heading southward as the Brahmaputra. Large-scale longitudinal rivers form the first harmonic of topography in large mountain belts (Koons 1994). Their development significantly modifies sediment routing systems compared to the transverse networks found in many smaller mountain belts (Hovius 1996). The most spectacular example of this is south of the Himalaya where the Indus and Bengal fans are fed by river systems running longitudinally within the mountain belt (Indus and Yarlung–Tsangpo), and along the mountain front (Ganges and Brahmaputra; Fig. 1). Longitudinal rivers may also play an important role in the denudation of a mountain belt. The longitudinal component of river systems are typically long, low gradient alluvial channels (i.e., channels bound by their own alluvial sediment as opposed to bedrock), and where fluvial incision rates, and hence denudation rates, are low compared to topographic uplift (Koons 1995). However, where these rivers transverse the Fig. 1. Map of main Himalayan rivers feeding the Indus and Bengal fans. The study area is boxed, and is located along the longitudinal portion of the Indus River in Ladakh, northern India (Fig. 3). 151 152 H. D. SINCLAIR & N. JAFFEY Fig. 2. Comparison of proposed stratigraphies for the Tertiary of the Indus Basin, Ladakh. Wakka Chu Molasse shown but not correlated. mountain range, high discharge combined with steep slopes results in high rates of fluvial incision. Modelling suggests that high fluvial incision rates will generate accelerated regional denudation through the maintenance of hillslopes by masswasting (Anderson 1994); these models are supported by comparisons of incision rates with longer-term denudation rates where the Indus River flows around the Nanga Parbat massif (Burbank et al. 1996). Additionally, it has been suggested that these sustained high rates of denudation may have resulted in the focusing of increased mechanical strain in this area as evidenced by folding and thrusting (Seeber et al. 1998; Zeitler & Koons 1998). Given the sedimentological, denudational and possible mechanical significance of the Indus River as a major longitudinal system, it is important to have some knowledge of the timing of its initiation, and hence to be able to compare it to the sedimentary record in the Indus fan, and the erosional record of the Nanga Parbat Massif. The natural location to look for evidence of a palaeo-Indus River running longitudinally within the mountain belt is along the course of the present-day river. Three localities along the upper Indus preserve a sedimentary record (Fig. 1): (1) Mount Kailas in southern Tibet where thick conglomerates drape the southern slopes of the Gangdese Batholith (Gansser 1964; Harrison et al. 1993); (2) Ladakh, northern India (this study); and (3) Kargil, NE Kashmir (Brookfield & Andrews-Speed 1984b). The Indus Group in Ladakh was chosen for this study due to the presence of previous background work (Van Haver 1984) and logistical considerations. In order to test the presence or absence of a palaeo-Indus within the Indus Group, testable predictions must be made. During periods of aggradation of a palaeo-Indus River along the Indus suture zone, facies and palaeocurrent data should record evidence of sustained fluvial discharge to the NNW. During aggradation, the denudation of the drainage basin, and the discharge of sediment out of the system would have been relatively low. In contrast, during periods of relatively high denudation and sediment discharge, the fluvial system would be degradational and incising, and the only preserved evidence may be an unconformity. During these periods, the thermochronology of the rocks beneath the unconformity may be used to evaluate the timing of initial degradation. This record may be complicated by localized, structurally induced uplift and degradation during sedimentation; this would be recorded by growth strata and time equivalent unconformities. These predictions are tested using the sedimentology, stratigraphy and thermochronology of the Indus Group. The Indus Group, Ladakh The Indus Group has been defined by Searle et al. (1990), and represents a dominantly continental succession, at least 2 km thick, of post-early Eocene age. It crops out SW of the Indus River between Khalsi in the NW, and Upshi in the SE. Underlying the Indus Group are a succession of marine strata of Late Albian to Eocene age described by Van Haver (1984) and Brookfield & Andrews-Speed (1984a). Structurally, the Indus Group are located in a 15–20 km wide zone, bound to the SSW by a suite of highly deformed rocks derived from the Indian passive margin (Zanskar units), the forearc (Nindam Unit) and the volcanic arc rocks (Dras Unit), and ophiolitic melange units of the Indus Suture Zone (Bassoulet et al. 1983; Searle et al. 1990). The north-northeastern margin of the Indus Group basin onlaps onto the Ladakh arc batholith of the southern margin of Tibet (Van Haver 1984; Searle et al. 1997; Fig. 2). The Indus Group have been interpreted as the remnants of an intermontane basin (Van Haver 1984; Garzanti & Van Haver 1988; Searle et al. 1990), conformably underlain by sediments which represent marine conditions in a fore-arc basin (Searle et al. 1990). Intense structural deformation and lack of preserved microfauna have hampered the establishment of a reliable biostratigraphy for the Indus Group (Fig. 2). However, at the base of the succession are foraminiferal limestones of the Sumda Formation which were dated as Palaeocene by Van Haver (1984) using gastropods and bivalves, and have been recently dated as latest Palaeocene INDUS GROUP SEDIMENTATION 153 Fig. 3. Simplified geological map showing the location of the Indus Group relative to the modern Indus River in Ladakh. The sedimentary rocks of the Indus Group have been thrusted and folded in a northward direction against the undeformed Ladakh Batholith. The cross-sections in Fig. 4 are located. Location of samples for apatite fission track age determination are starred, with their ages shown next to the locations. (54.9 Ma; O. Green, pers. comm.) using nummulitid biostratigraphy. Higher in the succession are remains of palm leaves and bivalves dated as Upper Eocene/Lower Oligocene (Van Haver 1984). The uppermost strata (Nimu Formation) of the Indus Group are undated. In the Kargil area, 80 km west of this study area, are along strike, tectonostratigraphically similar successions to the Indus Group called the Wakka Chu Molasse. The youngest dates from these rocks are from the Taramsu Formation that yields mammal remains dated as early Miocene (Brookfield & Andrews-Speed 1984b). Garzanti & Van Haver (1988) studied the petrography and geochemistry of the Indus Group and underlying successions, and demonstrated that the mid-Cretaceous to early Eocene succession records submarine sedimentation derived from the progressive unroofing of the volcanic cover of the magmatic arc, now represented by the Ladakh Batholith; the resultant sandstone composition is similar to modern and ancient fore-arc basins. At latest Palaeocene times (beginning Indus Group) there was a transition to predominantly continental sedimentation, associated with a sharp increase in plutonic detritus from the Ladakh Batholith, along with ophiolite-derived sediment. The final termination of marine sedimentation in early Eocene times is interpreted to record the initiation of continental collision (Searle et al. 1987). Within this tectono-stratigraphic framework, the depositional history of the post-early Eocene succession is analysed herein (i.e., the time from which no evidence of marine sedimentation occurred). This means that the Chogdo Formation which underlies the Nummulitic Limestones (Searle et al. 1990; Fig. 2) is not documented. The development of a detailed lithostratigraphy within which the sedimentology can be studied requires interpretation of the structural sections, with correlation of units between fold and thrust packages. The assumption in building a more detailed stratigraphic succession through such a deformed region is that, for the most part, reverse faults and thrusts carry older material over younger. Structural cross-sections Three cross-sections through the Indus Basin were aligned SSW–NNE, perpendicular to the structural strike (Figs 3 & 4). Multiphase folding and thrusting have resulted in the overprinting and interference between structures with vergence to the NNE and SSW (Searle et al. 1990). The southsouthwestern boundary of the Indus Basin sediments is the shear zone of the Indus suture, with an ophiolitic melange exposed near Chilling (Fig. 3a). To the south of this suture is the Lamayuru Formation which records deep-water sedimentation on the outer margins of the Indian passive margin (Searle et al. 1990, 1997). The northern boundary of the Indus Group is the Ladakh Batholith, which is locally onlapped by Indus Group sedimentary rocks of the Maastrichtian Basgo Formation; these have been interpreted as alluvial fan deposits on the northern margin of the fore-arc basin (Garzanti & Van Haver 1988; Garzanti et al. 1996). The Indus Group is located in the north-northeastern portion of these cross-sections. Each of the structural sections can be divided into a northern and southern unit, separated by the Choksti fault; a high-angle, south-southwestward dipping reverse fault that transported the Chogdo Formation over the Nurla Formation (Searle et al. 1990; Figs 3 and 5). In section c (Fig. 4), this fault has been back-steepened to the extent that it is now dipping north-northeastward. SSW of this fault, the Jurutze Formation (Searle et al. 1990) forms the core of a broad (5–15 km), complex anticlinorium, with the Sumda Formation (Sumda Gompa Formation; Van Haver 1984), Chogdo Formation and the Nummulitic Limestones (Van Haver 1984; Searle et al. 1990) folded and thrusted in its limbs. Immediately north of Chogdo, 100 m scale folds with opposing vergence exhibit complex interference structures. Axial planar cleavages can be seen dipping both to the NNE and SSW. In the Zanskar Gorge (Fig. 4a), to the north of the Choksti fault (in its footwall), is another large (3 km wavelength), upright anticlinorium with vertical fold hinges developed in the Nurla Formation. The northern limb again shows interference 154 H. D. SINCLAIR & N. JAFFEY Fig. 4. Structural cross-sections through the Indus and Tar groups showing some complex interference structures, but with a dominantly northward vergence in the northern areas. Cleavage orientation is shown by the dashed lines. Measured sedimentary sections illustrated in Figs 5, 6, 8 and 9 are located. between upright and SSW-vergent folds on a 50–100 m wavelength. This anticlinorium is again bound to the north by another thrust on to the Nimu Formation. Sections b and c also show north-northeastward vergent folding and thrusting to the north of the Choksti fault, accompanied by a progressive decrease in deformation. The thick-bedded Hemis INDUS GROUP SEDIMENTATION 155 the Nummulitic Limestones, as it is present at the base of the Nurla Formation in a detached thrust unit to the north. The following descriptions and interpretations commence with the Nummulitic Limestones which are thought to record the last evidence of a marine seaway between the Indian and Asian plates, and hence sedimentation along the suture immediately prior to collision (Searle et al. 1987). Nummulitic Limestones. The Nummulitic Limestones are best exposed along the Zanskar Gorge, 2–4 km south of Choksti (Fig. 4, section 1; Fig. 5). Benthic nummulitid foraminifera have yielded an age of 54.9 Ma (Green et al. pers. comm). The formation is approximately 180 m thick, and commences at its base with 2–3 m thick, coarse sandstones and mudstones interbedded with approximately 1 m thick nummulitid-rich packstones. Many of the limestone units are sharp-based with locally developed pebble layers; pebbles comprise micritic limestone, quartz vein, schists and green mudstones, with no granodiorite. Intervals of siltstone and fine sandstone show climbing ripple lamination and low-angle cross-bedding. Higher up the section, packstones dominate and contain a more varied fauna with small isolated corals, oysters and other bivalves. Details of the foraminifera present in the Nummulitic Limestones can be found in Van Haver (1984). The Nummulitic Limestones abruptly overlie floodplain mudstones of the upper Chogdo Formation (Searle et al. 1990; Fig. 5), and are here interpreted to represent a transgression into an inner, carbonate ramp setting; i.e., they accumulated at approximately mean fair-weather wave-base (Burchette & Wright 1992). The packstones suggest wave reworking, but insufficient to completely remove the lime mud component. The sharp, pebbly bases to some units suggest episodic storm influence, and the sandstone intervals may record sand-rich shoals or even shoreface deposits similar to sandstone units which intercalate with the time equivalent Nummulitic Limestones of the Alpine periphery (Sinclair et al. 1998). Fig. 5. Sedimentary section through the succession immediately underlying the Indus Group, measured south of Sumda-Do, Zanskar Gorge (Fig. 3). This succession records fore-arc sedimentation prior to closure of the Tethys Ocean. The Nummulitic Limestones (uppermost Palaeocene; Van Haver 1984) record the last unambiguous evidence of marine conditions, and have been used as an age constraint on continental collision (Searle et al 1987). Conglomerates found in the east, are steeply tilted, but only locally folded into large wavelength (several hundred metres) folds. Stratigraphy and sedimentology The stratigraphic subdivision used here is based on Searle et al. (1990; Fig. 2); which itself was based on Thakur (1981) and Thakur & Misra (1984). The Jurutze, and Sumda formations underlie the Indus Group which were termed the Tar Group by Searle et al. (1990; Figs 2 & 5). In the southern succession of the Zanskar Gorge (Fig. 4a), the Nummulitic Limestones are overlain by the Nurla Formation. North of the Choksti fault, the lower part of the Nurla Formation comprises grey sandstone/mudstone alternations exposed at the Choksti Bridge, and hence named the Choksti Bridge Member. It is possible that the Choksti Bridge Member is synchronous with Nurla Formation. The Nurla Formation has been documented in the Zanskar Gorge (Fig. 6a) and between Shang and Martselang (Fig. 6b). The succession in the Zanskar Gorge is located immediately north of the Choksti Conglomerate, i.e., stratigraphically beneath it (Fig. 4a). It is also found further to the north in a separate thrust sheet. Overall, the total thickness for the Nurla Formation is at least 700 m, comprising alternations of coarse sandstone units from 10 to 20 m thick, with thin to medium-bedded siltstones, fine sandstones and mudstones forming units from 8 to 20 m thick; the overall sandstone/mudstone ratio is approximately 60%. The sandstones are sharp-based, with pebbly to conglomeratic basal deposits; the basal surfaces locally show a 10–20 disconformable relationship with the underlying sandstone/mudstone alternations. Most units show some degree of upward fining, and commonly terminate abruptly upwards into the siltstones and mudstones. Bedding geometries are variable, with tabular to lensoid beds showing low-angle cross-cutting relationships. The sandstone units contain planar and trough cross-stratification with up to 1 m thick cross-sets. Locally, the sandstone units are interbedded with 0.5–1 m thick conglomerates. The intervening mudstones and sandstones vary in colour from red to green to dark grey. Siltstone beds range from 2 to 5 cm, and are normally graded. Remains of leaves and small wood fragments are common. Some of the red mudstones are mottled, with the localized development of horizons rich in small (<2 cm) irregular, cream 156 H. D. SINCLAIR & N. JAFFEY Fig. 6. Sedimentary sections through the Nurla Formation: (a) exposed along Zanskar Gorge (Fig. 4a), and (b) exposed in valley between Shang and Martselang (Fig. 4c). These sections record the intercalation of thick sandstone units with red, green and grey mudstones and siltstones. The successions are interpreted as the deposits of aggrading fluvial systems with meandering and braided channels cutting through fine-grained floodplain deposits. coloured, calcareous nodules. The outcrops north of Sumda-Do (Fig. 6) comprise thinner sandstone units (1–3 m) with extensive planar cross-bedding (30 cm cosets). Conglomerates are also better developed (up to 5 m thick), comprising well-rounded, clast-supported conglomerates with clasts up to 15 cm across. Clasts are dominated by metasediments including pelites, grey micrites and chert pebbles, approximately 20–30% of the clasts are granodioritic. Van Haver (1984) also identified fragments of peridotite which may have been derived from the ophiolitic suture zone or the Spontang Ophiolite (Searle et al. 1997). The conglomerates show low-angle cross-bedding. Palaeocurrent measurements from the Nurla Formation indicate a variable southward to south-eastward directed palaeoflow (Fig. 7a), with an additional north-directed component (Fig. 7b). This succession is interpreted as the aggradational deposits of meandering and braided, sandy and pebbly fluvial channels over floodplain muds and silts. Rapid channel avulsion processes led to the abrupt transitions from channel sandstones and conglomerates to floodplain fines. The thinner bedded sandstones are considered overbank flood deposits. The lowangle discordancies along bedding surfaces record broad downcutting into underlying floodplain mudstones. In the lower parts of the Nurla Formation near the Choksti Bridge along the Zanskar Gorge (Fig. 4a), is a succession of strata that are significantly different from the bulk of the Nurla Formation. It is at least 100 m thick, and comprises thin to thick-bedded (<1.5 m), medium to coarse sandstones, interbedded with dark grey siltstones and mudstones. The sandstones are tabular bedded, sharp-based with locally developed load structures. The beds are non-graded to normally graded, with ripple laminated tops. The siltstones and mudstones are finely laminated to bedded on a 1–15 mm scale, with ripple and planar laminae. These strata are interpreted as the result of episodic deposition by turbidity currents in a sub-wave base environment. Fig. 7. Palaeocurrent roses for data from the Indus Group. The plots are binned at 10 intervals, and the number within each interval increase linearly from the origin. All data have been corrected for structural dip. (a) Dip of foresets from planar cross-bedding in the Nurla Formation, south of Stok Palace. (b) Plan-view ripple forms and planar cross stratification data from the Nurla Formation, Zanskar Gorge. (c) a-axis pebble imbrication data from the Choksti Conglomerate Formation, Zanskar Gorge (only pebbles with all axes well exposed were measured). (d) Planar cross-stratification and a-axis pebble imbrication data from the Hemis Conglomerate Formation, Zanskar Gorge. (e) Flute and groove casts from the Nimu Formation, Zanskar Gorge. (f) Flute and groove casts from Nimu Formation, Saspol. Choksti Conglomerate Formation. The Choksti Conglomerate Formation is exposed immediately south of Choksti village along the Zanskar Gorge (Fig. 4a). It is at least 300 m thick, with the lower 100 m of the succession being dominated by medium to thin-bedded laterally variable, fine to medium grained sandstones. Palaeocurrents were predominantly to the NE to east (Fig. 7c). The upper 200 m of the formation is dominated by amalgamated, thick-bedded (up to 8 m) conglomerates (Fig. 8). The conglomerates are dominantly, clastsupported with a very poorly sorted, very coarse sandstone matrix. Sandstone beds within the conglomerates are locally planar cross-bedded. Larger clasts (up to 30 cm) are rounded, with smaller clasts being more angular. Clast types higher in the succession are dominated by red and green metasediments with approximately 10% volcanics and 10% granodiorite. The granodiorite content can get up to 60% lower in the succession. The overall succession is divided by two red mudstone units, approximately 4 m thick. Conglomerate deposition occurred during ephemeral, high bedload and suspended load transport resulting in a-axis imbrication of pebbles; a fabric most typically found in deep-water conglomerates (Harms et al. 1982). However, the intercalated red mudstones suggest deposition in a continental environment; an ephemeral, sheetflood dominated alluvial fan (Blair & McPherson 1994), or a braided fluvial system are thought the most likely candidates for the environment of deposition. INDUS GROUP SEDIMENTATION Fig. 8. Sedimentary section through the Choksti Conglomerate measured from the Zanskar Gorge, opposite Choksti village. Hemis Conglomerate Formation (late Eocene/early Oligocene; Van Haver 1984). The Hemis Conglomerate Formation is best developed in the east of the study area (Van Haver 1984; Searle et al. 1990), and were recorded in this study north of Martselang (Fig. 4c) and north of Hemis. Their maximum thickness is approximately 1500 m in the region of Hemis, with only a thin remnant (150 m) preserved 50 km west in the Zanskar Gorge. This formation is characterized by laterally continuous (over several kilometres), 20–50 m thick conglomerate and sandstone units interbedded with red mudstones. The conglomerates are well-bedded, with a clast supported texture, commonly imbricated, with well rounded clasts up to 30 cm. Clast lithologies are dominated (up to 90%) by granodiorites, acidic lavas and tuffs which are thought to have been derived from the Ladakh Batholith (Van Haver 1984), along with a few metasediments. Locally interbedded coarse sandstones show 75 cm thick, trough cross-sets. Overall, the conglomeratic units show a slight fining and thinning up, and their bases range from abrupt to gradual. The intervening red mudstones can locally develop up to 40 m thick, and contain thin (1–5 cm), laminated, fining-upward siltstone beds, with some burrowing and wood fragments scattered along bedding planes. Locally developed are green, branching networks believed to represent rootlets. No palaeocurrent measurements were obtained from this formation. This succession is interpreted as the intercalation of high-energy (possibly ephemeral) fluvial channels and floodplain mudstones in the east of the area, thinning westward. In the westernmost exposures of these conglomerates located 1.5 km south of the confluence of the Indus and Zanskar rivers (Figs 4a & 9), the conglomerates have a different sedimentary character, and have previously been 157 Fig. 9. (a) Sedimentary section through the Hemis Conglomerate and Nimu formations measured along the Zanskar Gorge. (b) Close-up of sandstone/mudstone alternations from the Nimu Formation interpreted as a succession of turbidites. Palaeocurrents measured from cross-bedding are shown by the arrows with arrowed bases, data from flutes shown with dots at base; these data are plotted in Fig. 7. interpreted as the thrusted repetition of the Choksti Conglomerate Formation (Searle et al. 1990). However, their stratigraphic position at the base of the Nimu Formation, and their granodiorite-clast-rich nature links them more closely to the Hemis Conglomerate Formation, and here, they are interpreted as along strike equivalents. Near the base of the conglomerates in the Zanskar Gorge is a 20 m thick, clast-supported conglomerate dominated by granodioritic boulders and mudstone clasts (Fig. 9). The base of this conglomerate cuts down at least 10 m into the underlying coarse sandstones. The upper part of the conglomerate unit fines upward into very poorly sorted, coarse sandstones with isolated, scattered boulders. The upper part of the formation comprises 1–10 m thick, amalgamated, medium to coarse sandstones rich in mudstone clasts up to 3 m across. Beds are normal to non-graded, and are laterally variable in thickness, and are sharp based, with extensive downcutting. Cross bedding is rarely developed, with cross-sets up to 20 cm thick. Locally developed are mudstone beds 0.1–4 m thick. Palaeocurrent data indicate a predominantly north to northnortheastwards directed flow, with a minor southwestward component (Fig. 7). This succession is conformably overlain by dark grey mudstones and sandstones of the Nimu Formation. This part of the Hemis Conglomerate Formation is interpreted as the deposits of amalgamated, very coarse, highconcentration turbidity currents with a conglomeratic bedload (Lowe 1982). The extensive downcutting, and abundance of 158 H. D. SINCLAIR & N. JAFFEY mudstone clasts and rafts suggests that these beds accumulated in channels cutting into a mud-rich, northward dipping, sub-aqueous slope. It is thought that these deposits record sedimentation on a northward facing, fan-delta slope shed from coarse fluvial systems similar to those recorded in the Hemis Conglomerate Formation; examples of fan delta-fed turbidite systems are summarized by Massari & Colella (1988), classifying them as slope-type fan-deltas. Nimu Formation. The Nimu Formation forms the first outcrops found on the southern bank of the modern Indus River between the village of Saspol in the west, eastward to Martselang (Fig. 3). In this study, the Nimu Formation has been studied from east to west at Stok, Pic Nimu, the Zanskar Gorge and Saspol (Fig. 3). The maximum observed thickness of the Nimu Formation was 600 m at Pic Nimu, although it is likely that the total stratigraphic thickness is considerably greater. Near Stok Palace, Stok, the Nimu Formation comprises 0.04–1.5 m thick, coarse to fine sandstones intercalated with red mudstones and thin siltstones. The sandstones show variable grading, with planar, rippled and undulatory lamination. Abrupt basal surfaces locally show bottom structures such as grooves. The siltstones are intensely rippled, with bedding planes showing original bedforms with straight crests, and symmetrical and trochoidal cross-sectional geometries; features typical of wave generated ripples (Allen 1982). Imprints of small bivalves are common on bedding surfaces; Van Haver (1984) identified them as a freshwater bivalve of the genus Unio. Burrowing is common in the finer deposits of this succession. At Pic Nimu, the facies are similar, but sandstone beds are thicker (up to 2 m), and occur as sandstone dominated packages ranging from 100 to 200 m thick; similarly, the intervening mudstones are up to 100 m thick. The succession at Stok and Nimu suggest episodic sand accumulation in a shallow, sub-aqueous environment; it has been suggested that the system was deltaic (Van Haver 1984). In the Zanskar Gorge and at Saspol, the Nimu Formation comprises a different suite of facies. However, whether they are time equivalent to the deposits of Pic Nimu and Stok (Searle et al. 1990) is questionable. The structural cross-section from the Zanskar Gorge suggests that the Nimu Formation south of the confluence has been structurally overthrusted onto the more northerly Nimu Formation (Fig. 4a) which is traceable 2 km east to Pic Nimu. It is therefore proposed that the exposures at Pic Nimu are younger than those in the Zanskar Gorge. In the Zanskar Gorge, the facies comprise sandstone/ mudstone alternations (Figs 9 & 10) with coarse sandstone beds up to 2 m thick, most showing normal grading, sharp bases and more gradually fining tops. Flutes and grooves are common on the base of beds, indicating palaeo-flow to the north (Figs 7e & 9b). Mudstone clasts up to 1 m across are common in the thicker beds. Amalgamation of coarse sandstone beds forms sandstone packages up to 12 m thick (Fig. 9b). Thinner-bedded medium sandstones are also sharpbased and normally graded, and contain extensive currentripple lamination, again indicating northward palaeo-flow. The mudstones are dark grey, and finely laminated. In the region of Saspol (Fig. 3), the facies are similar to those in the Zanskar Gorge, but show an increase in sandstone thickness (up to 4 m), with more pebbly, and partially erosive bases. Planar cross-bedding is also more common. Palaeo-flow from grooves and flutes in the Saspol region was directed primarily to the SE (Fig. 7f). Fig. 10. Field drawing of unconformity at top Nimu Formation, overlain by undeformed Quaternary alluvial sediments. Location approximately 500 m south of the confluence of the Zanskar and Indus rivers, southwest of Pic Nimu (Fig. 3). The Nimu Formation is deformed throughout the region. Their upper surface is either the present-day erosion surface, or a palaeo-erosion surface that is now blanketed by undeformed sands and gravels (Fig. 10) deposited by alluvial fans, and Quaternary lakes caused by the damming of the Indus valley (Bürgisser et al. 1982). Palaeo-environments of the Indus Group; evidence for the palaeo-Indus The intermontane basin (post-Nurla Formation) was infilled by sediments deposited in environments which alternated between fluvial and (probably) lacustrine (Fig. 11). The Nurla Formation and Choksti Conglomerates record coarse-grained, braided and meandering channels interbedded with floodplain Fig. 11. Summary of sedimentary succession exposed along the Zanskar Gorge. Columns on right-hand side indicate formation names and approximate palaeo-environmental interpretations. The zig-zagged lines through the section indicate the location of major thrust faults. INDUS GROUP SEDIMENTATION mudstones. There is no evidence of major fluvial incision, and there is high preservation of floodplain muds, suggesting that the bulk of this succession is aggradational (Bridge & Leeder 1979). The palaeo-currents during this period were highly variable, with a predominantly northeasterly flow in the Choksti Conglomerate; this is highly at variance with the WNW directed flow required to suggest these sediments record the palaeo-Indus. The Nimu Formation and western outcrops of the Hemis Conglomerate record >300 m of sediment deposited dominantly by mass flows and turbidity currents, at water depths below the influence of fluvial or wave activity, representing a water depth of >20 m, and possibly significantly more. It has been suggested that these formations were deposited in a large lake (Van Haver 1984; Searle et al. 1990). Palaeocurrents in these formations are again variable, with a northward and south-eastward component (Fig. 7). The upper Nimu Formation records a regression into shallow water environments. As with the previous formations, the Nimu Formation does not appear to record the early development of the Indus River. The Hemis Conglomerate records high energy fluvial sedimentation. However, its local appearance and westward termination preclude its interpretation as a sustained, basin-parallel flowing fluvial system. Overall, the Indus Group record sedimentation within variable palaeo-environments. Palaeocurrents are oblique or perpendicular to the modern structural strike, and to the longitudinal axis of the palaeogeographically restored Indus Basin (Van Haver 1984; Garzanti & Van Haver 1988; Garzanti et al. 1996). The limited range in compositions found within the clasts of the conglomerates (Van Haver 1984), and their dominantly local origin (from the Ladakh magmatic arc), favour sedimentation from internally drained, transverse fluvial and fluvio-deltaic fan systems as suggested by the palaeocurrent data. None of the sedimentological data suggests that there was any time period of sustained, fluvial discharge to the NNW that might record sedimentation by a precursor fluvial system to the modern Indus. Therefore, the Indus River is not thought to have initiated along the Indus suture zone until after deposition of the Indus Group. Burial and exhumation of the Indus Group Maximum burial temperatures for the Indus Group can be estimated from illite crystallinity values presented by Van Haver (1984); values measured range from an illite crystallinity index of 4 in the Nummulitic Limestones to 9.8 in the Nurla Formation. These values are inversely proportional to depth (Zen & Thompson 1974), and hence the maximum burial depth is recorded by the Nummulitic Limestones. Correlations of illite crystallinity values with coal rank and vitrinite reflectance values (Zen & Thompson 1974; Cornford 1984) allow estimates of the maximum possible temperatures reached by the Nummulitic Limestones of 280C. Maximum possible temperatures reached by the Nurla Formation (illite crystallinity index=10) are 155C. The difference between these two values (125C) translates to a differential burial of 2.5– 5 km assuming a possible range of geothermal gradients from 25–50C km1. This would allow for the estimated total thickness for the succession of 3.5 km. Apatite fission track thermochronology enables an approximation of the time at which an apatite crystal passed through 159 Fig. 12. Time temperature plot for the Indus Group and for the Ladakh Batholith. Illite crystallinity data give estimates of maximum temperatures experienced by the Indus Group. Since the values are greater than the temperature of the apatite fission track partial annealing zone (120–60C), the apatite fission track ages will have been reset from the source rock age during burial. The neighbouring Ladakh Batholith has older apatite fission track ages indicating slower cooling rates during exhumation. The more rapid cooling of the Indus Group is interpreted as a result of structurally induced uplift and erosion during Zanskar backthrusting. the 110C (10C) isotherm during cooling to the surface (Brown et al. 1994). By combining the age at which a unit was at 11010C with its maximum burial temperature, and assuming a linear cooling path, it is possible to estimate the time at which maximum burial took place. This is used to approximate the timing of transition from sediment accumulation (burial) to erosionally driven exhumation within the Indus Basin. Apatite fission track ages from the Indus Group of the Ladakh area are currently limited to two samples collected by P. Clift, and processed at University College London by A. Carter (Clift, unpublished data). One sample from the Nimu Formation near the village of Nimu which has a central age of 143 Ma, and one from a boulder in the Choksti Conglomerate from the Zanskar gorge with a central age of 12 Ma. Plotting these values on to a temperature/time plot (Fig. 12), and projecting the line of cooling up to the maximum burial temperature for the Nurla Formation enables a broad time interval of 26–14 Ma in which cessation of sedimentation and initiation of exhumation in the basin began (Fig. 12). This correlates well with the youngest preserved sediments found to the west in the Kargil area which are early Miocene (16– 25 Ma). Apatite fission track ages from the neighbouring Ladakh Batholith immediately north of the Indus River (Fig. 3) record older dates than those found in the Indus Group. Two central ages for the batholith at Upshi are 283 and 292 Ma. This information on the burial and exhumation of the Indus Group suggests that sediment accumulation in the Indus Basin terminated in early Miocene times. The transition from fluvial aggradation to subsequent fluvial downcutting records baselevel lowering most likely associated with structurally driven surface uplift (Ouchi 1985). Long-term fluvial incision is the driving force behind erosional denudation and the consequent exhumation of rock to the surface (Anderson 1994; Burbank 160 H. D. SINCLAIR & N. JAFFEY et al. 1996). The average rate of cooling can be translated into mean incision rates assuming a geothermal gradient. Early Miocene geothermal gradients of 40C km1 have been calculated in Kohistan to the west of this area using fission track data (Zeitler 1985); in this calculation a range of 30 to 50C km1 is used. The apatite fission track ages from the Indus Group translate to cooling rates of 5 to 11C Ma1 which equate to long-term incision/denudation rates of 0.1 to 0.4 mm a1. These rates are slow compared to values from the Indus valley around the Nanga Parbat massif of up to 10 mm a1 based on apatite fission track ages (Burbank et al. 1996). The cooling rates from the neighbouring Ladakh Batholith were slower, ranging from 3.2 to 4.8C Ma1 which equate to denudation rates of 0.06–0.16 mm a1. The contrast in denudation rates from the lower values in the Ladakh Batholith to the higher values in the Indus Group is interpreted to result from the northward thrusting of the Zanskar and Indus sedimentary rocks against the undeformed buttress of the batholith, i.e., structurally driven surface uplift and erosion. Initiation of the palaeo-Indus and regional uplift The data presented comprise a sedimentary succession which records accumulation in an internally drained intermontane basin (Fig. 13a) rather than evidence of a major westwardflowing river system from Eocene to early Miocene times, and a cooling history which reveals relatively slow denudation in the area since then. Hence, it is proposed that the earliest possible time for initiation of a palaeo-Indus river in this area was early Miocene (i.e. <26 Ma) as opposed to 45–55 Ma suggested by Searle (1996), Qayyum et al. (1997) and Clift et al. (2000). The termination of sedimentation along the Indus suture zone, and the onset of denudation in early Miocene times relates to the larger scale development of the Himalayas at that time. The Indus valley is bordered to the SW by the Zanskar range and High Himalayas. Maximum P–T conditions, indicative of maximum crustal thickening in these areas, occurred during Late Oligocene to Early Miocene times (Searle et al. 1992). Comparisons of detrital zircon ages with their stratigraphic ages from molasse sedimentary rocks indicate regional accelerated unroofing of the Himalayas commencing in early Miocene times (Harrison et al. 1993), associated with initiation of the Main Central Thrust (Harrison et al. 1998). Similar results have been interpreted from sandstone provenance studies on the Murree and Siwalik supergroups recording the infill of the foreland basin (Parkash et al. 1980; Critelli & Garzanti 1994). The combination of maximum burial ages, and accelerated unroofing of the Himalayas during early Miocene times suggests that this was the time at which the main Himalayan chain was initiated as a zone of high elevation and relief (Searle 1995). This period of thickening and uplift is likely to have been the mechanical force necessary to initiate northwarddirected (back-) thrusting of the Zanskar and Indus sedimentary rocks resulting in termination of sedimentation in the Indus intermontane basin, and its subsequent erosional unroofing (Fig. 13b). The differential uplift field as recorded in the cooling histories between the backthrust Zanskar and Indus sediments and the relatively undeformed Ladakh Batholith provides a mechanism for the development of a major longitudinal river system such as the Indus (Koons 1995). Fig. 13. Approximate palaeogeographic reconstructions along the Indus Suture Zone during Oligocene and Miocene times. (a) During Oligocene times, the elevation of the present Tibetan Plateau was between 1 and 3 km, with the incipient Himalayan mountain belt remained relatively low (Harrison et al. 1998). Additional piggy-back basins were located over this area, but are not shown at this scale (Critelli & Garzanti 1994). Sedimentation of the Indus Group along the Indus Suture Zone fluctuated between fluvial, deltaic and deeper water environments, with variable palaeocurrent directions, and a predominantly local source (Van Haver 1984); these sediments do not represent sedimentation by a north-northwestwardly through-flowing river that could be interpreted as a palaeo-Indus River. (b). Accelerated regional uplift in Early Miocene times resulted in the termination of sedimentation along the Indus Suture Zone, and the onset of fluvial incision driving denudation. Differential uplift between the actively backthrusting Zanskar and Indus sedimentary rocks and the undeformed Ladakh Batholith provided a mechanism for the initiation of a longitudinal river system. At a similar time, the Indus Delta and submarine fan prograded rapidly into its present position. It is possible that this may have been linked, and that it records the timing of initiation of the main Indus River as a longitudinal drainage network, but this remains speculative. Evolution of the Indus River system The earliest evidence for some form of westward-flowing drainage network in the western Himalayas comes from the late Eocene to early Miocene Khojak Formation in the INDUS GROUP SEDIMENTATION Katawaz Basin of Pakistan (Qayyum et al. 1997, in press). These sedimentary rocks record a delta and submarine fan complex that accumulated in a remnant ocean basin on the western margin of the evolving collisional belt. Qayyum et al. (in press) provide sandstone provenance data that indicate that the Khojak Formation was derived from a collisional orogen, and not a magmatic arc. These data make it highly unlikely that the Indus Group, which is rich in material derived from the Ladakh Batholith, could represent a proximal feeder system for the Khojak Formation. The present-day Indus floodplain of eastern Pakistan was a shallow seaway called the Kirthar Gulf in Oligocene to Middle Miocene times (Kazmi 1984). The northern margin of the Kirthar Gulf is recorded by the Bugti bone beds (Pascoe 1964), which contain a transition from coastal to marine deltaic environments in Early Burdigalian times, recording the initiation of southward progradation of the Indus Delta (Kazmi 1984). Accelerated sedimentation in the present position of the Indus submarine fan appears to have commenced in Late Oligocene/Early Miocene times (Whitmarsh et al. 1974; Kolla & Coumes 1987; Davies et al. 1995), although much of the deep-sea drilling information is on the periphery of the main Indus Fan, which is likely to have been initiated later than more proximal parts. The earliest evidence for a palaeo-Indus river of comparable tectono-geomorphic status to the present-day river comes from foreland basin deposits of the Siwalik Group (Abassi & Friend 2000). The Janak Conglomerate on the western margins of the Potwar Plateau was deposited from 9 to 1 Ma, and records sedimentation from a large braided river sourced in the High Himalaya of northern Pakistan, and interpreted as the palaeo-Indus (Abassi & Friend 2000). It is evident that the southward progradation of the Indus Delta and initial development of the Indus submarine fan started by at least end Oligocene/beginning Miocene times. Whilst there is evidence of sedimentation in an intermontane basin (Indus Group) and a remnant ocean basin (Khojak Formation) prior to this, it would be incorrect to describe these as the deposits of a palaeo-Indus River. These palaeogeographic considerations support the notion that accelerated unroofing of the Himalayas at end Oligocene/beginning Miocene times was associated with the expansion of a paleoIndus delta/submarine fan system. At the same time, differential uplift between the Zanskar and Indus sedimentary rocks and the Ladakh Batholith provided a mechanism for the initiation of a major longitudinal river system along the route of the modern Indus River (Fig. 13b). Whether the embryonic Indus delta was initiated by a river following this route is difficult to assess, however, the earliest sedimentological record for a palaeo-Indus river of comparable tectono-geomorphic status to the modern system starts at 9 Ma. Conclusions (1) The Indus Group of Ladakh, northwestern India, records sedimentation from early Eocene times in an intermontane basin. Sedimentation occurred in fluvial, shallow and deepwater environments. Palaeocurrent data through the Indus Group are variable, recording flow to the south, SE, north and NNE. The environmental reconstructions, sediment provenance and palaeocurrent data suggest that the Indus intermontane basin was internally drained, and does not represent sedimentation by a through-flowing palaeo-Indus River shedding material west-northwestward. 161 (2) Maximum burial temperatures for the Indus Group using illite crystallinity ranged from 155 to 280 C. Apatite fission track ages for the Indus Group range from 12 to 14 Ma. Combining these data with stratigraphic information from the along strike equivalent sediments of the Kargil area suggests that the Indus Basin accumulated sediment until early Miocene times, when erosional unroofing was initiated. Timeaveraged rates of unroofing since then have ranged from 0.1 to 0.4 mm a 1; this is relatively fast compared to the unroofing of the neighbouring Ladakh Batholith which ranged from 0.06–0.16 mm a 1. (3) The early Miocene was a time of accelerated uplift throughout the western Himalaya, and is coincident with the time of initiation of the Indus Delta/submarine fan system. It is proposed that this is the earliest time at which a palaeo-Indus River of similar tectono-geomorphic status to the present system could have been initiated. Differential uplift between the Zanskar and Indus sedimentary rocks and the Ladakh Batholith provide a mechanism for the initiation of a longitudinal river at this time following the route of the modern Indus. Although, whether this was the location of the main trunk stream feeding the embryonic Indus delta remains speculative. M. P. Searle first introduced us to the area and helped enormously with logistics and discussions of the geological setting for which are extremely grateful. T. Crosby, V. Sinclair and F. Hussein are thanked for assistance in the field. P. Clift is thanked for the provision of unpublished data. The paper was written whilst on sabbatical at Pennsylvania State University, where much logistical support and scientific stimulus was given by D. W. Burbank and colleagues. H.D.S. was partly funded by a Birmingham University Science Faculty pilot research scheme. Reviews by E. Garzanti and P. Friend, plus editorial comments by D. Pirrie are much appreciated. M. Qayyum is thanked for providing pre-prints of forthcoming publications. Acknowledgement of the above colleagues does not necessarily mean they all agree with the interpretations presented. References A, I.A. & F, P.F. 2000. Exotic conglomerates of the Neogene. Siwalik succession and their implications for the tectonic and topographic. evolution of the Western Himalaya. In: K, M.A., T, P.J., S, M.P. & J, M.Q. (eds) Tectonics of the Nanga Parbat Syntaxis and the Western Himalaya. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 170, 455–466. A, J.R.L. 1982. Sedimentary Structures: Their Character and Physical Basis. Developments in Sedimentology, Vol. 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam. A, R.S. 1994. Evolution of the Santa Cruz mountains, California, through tectonic growth and geomorphic decay. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99, B10, 20161–20179. B, J.P., C, M., G, J., L, M., M, J. & M, G. 1983. Geological studies in the Indus Suture Zone of Ladakh (Himalayas). In: G, Q.J. (ed.) Contributions to Himalayan Geology, 2, 1–30. B, T.C. & MP, J.G. 1994. Alluvial fans and their natural distinction from rivers based on morphology, hydraulic processes, sedimentary processes, and facies assemblage. Journal of Sedimentary Research, A64, 450–489. B, J.S. & L, M. 1979. A simulation model of alluvial stratigraphy. Sedimentology, 26, 617–644. B, M.E. & A-S, C.P. 1984a. Sedimentology, petrography and tectonic significance of the shelf, flysch and molasse clastic deposits across the Indus suture zone. Sedimentary Geology, 40, 287–291. B, M.E. & A-S, C.P. 1984b. Sedimentation in a high altitude intermontane basin—the Wakka Chu Molasse (Mid-Tertiary, Northwestern India). Bulletin of the Indian Geological Association, 17, 175–193. B, R.W., S, M.A. & G, A.J.W. 1994. Apatite fission track analysis: its potential for the estimation of denudation rates and its 162 H. D. SINCLAIR & N. JAFFEY implications for models of long-term landscape development. In: K, M.J. (ed.) Process Models and Theoretical Geomorphology. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, New York, 23–53. B, D.W., L, J., F, E., A, R.S., B, N., R, M.R. & D, C. 1996. Bedrock incision, rock uplift and threshold hillslopes in the northwestern Himalayas. Nature, 379, 505–510. B, T.P. & W, V.P. 1992. Carbonate ramp depositional systems. Sedimentary Geology, 79, 3–57. B̈, H.M., G, A. & P, J. 1982. Late Glacial lake sediments of the Indus valley area, northwestern Himalayas. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 75, 51–63. C, P., S, N., L, G., G, C., S, H.-U., C, M. & A, S. 2000. Fifty-five million years of Tibetan evolution recorded in the Indus Fan. EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 81, 277–281. C, C. 1984. Source rocks and hydrocarbons of the North Sea. In: G, K. (ed.) Introduction to the Petroleum Geology of the North Sea, 171–204. C, S. & G, E. 1994. Provenance of the Lower Tertiary Murree redbeds (Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis, Pakistan) and initial rising of the Himalayas. Sedimentary Geology, 89, 265–284. D, T.A., K, R.B. & R, A.T.S. 1995. A time-slice approach to the history of Cenozoic sedimentation in the Indian Ocean. Sedimentary Geology, 96, 157–179. F, P.F. 1998. General form and age of the denudation system of the Himalaya. GFF, 120, 231–236. G, A. 1964. Geology of the Himalayas. J. Wiley Interscience, New York. G, E. & V H, T. 1988. The Indus clastics: forearc basin sedimentation in the Ladakh Himalaya (India). Sedimentary Geology, 59, 237–249. G, E., C, S. & I, R.V. 1996. Paleogeographic and paleotectonic evolution of the Himalayan Range as reflected by detrital modes of Tertiary sandstones and modern sands (Indus transect, India and Pakistan). Geological Society of America Bulletin, 108, 631–642. H, J.C., S, J.B. & W, R.G. 1982. Structures and sequences in clastic rocks. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Short Course lecture notes, no. 9. H, T.M., C, P., H, S.A., B, S., O, T.P. & K, W.S.F. 1993. Isotopic preservation of Himalayan/Tibetan uplift, denudation, and climatic histories of two molasse deposits. Journal of Geology, 101, 157–175. H, T.M., Y, A. & R, F.J. 1998. Orographic evolution of the Himalaya and Tibetan Plateau. In: C, T.J. & B, K.C. (eds) Tectonic Boundary Conditions for Climate Reconstructions. Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics, 39, 39–72. H, N. 1996. Regular spacing of drainage outlets from linear mountain belts. Basin Research, 8, 29–44. H, N. 1998. Controls on sediment supply by large rivers. In: S, K. & MC, P. (eds) Relative Role of Eustasy, Climate, and Tectonism in Continental Rocks. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publications, 59, 3–16. K, A.H. 1984. Geology of the Indus Delta. In: H, B.U. & M, J.D. (eds) Marine Geology and Oceanography of the Arabian Sea and Coastal Pakistan. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 71–84. K, V. & C, F. 1987. Morphology, internal structure, seismic stratigraphy, and sedimentation of the Indus Fan. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 71, 650–677. K, P.O. 1994. Three dimensional critical wedges: Tectonics and topography in oblique collisional wedges. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99, 12301–12315. K, P.O. 1995. Modelling the topographic evolution of mountain belts. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 23, 375–408. L, D.R. 1982. Sediment gravity flows: II. Depositional models with specific reference to deposits of high-density turbidity currents. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 52, 279–297. M, F. & C, A. 1988. Evolution and types of fan delta systems in some major tectonic settings. In: N, W. & S, R.J. (eds) Fan Deltas: Sedimentology and tectonic settings. Blackie and Son, London, 103–122. M, J.D. & M, R.H. 1983. World-wide delivery of river sediment to the oceans. Journal of Geology, 91, 1–21. O, S. 1985. Response of alluvial rivers to slow active tectonic movement. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 96, 504–515. P, B., S, R.P. & R, A.K. 1980. The Siwalik Group (Molasse) – sediments shed by collision of continental plates. Sedimentary Geology, 25, 127–159. P, E.H. 1964. A Manual of the Geology of India and Burma, Vol. III. Government of India Press, Calcutta. Q, M., L, R.D. & N, A.R. 1997. Discovery of the palaeoindus delta-fan complex. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 154, 753–756. Q, M., N, A.R. & L, R.D. 2000. Detrital modes and provenance of the Palaeogene Khojak Formation in Pakistan: Implications on early Himalayan orogeny and unroofing. Geological Society of America Bulletin, in press. S, M.P. 1995. The timing of metamorphism, magmatism, and cooling in the Zanskar, Garhwal, and Nepal Himalaya. Journal of Nepal Geological Society, 11, 103–120. S, M.P. 1996. Geological evidence against large-scale pre-Holocene offsets along the Karakorum fault: Implications for the limited extrusion of the Tibetan Plateau. Tectonics, 15, 171–186. S, M.P., C, R.I., S, B. & MC, J. 1997. Structure of the North Indian continental margin in the Ldakh-Zanskar Himalayas: implications for the timing of obduction of the Spontang ophiolite, India-Asia collision and deformation events in the Himalaya. Geological Magazine, 134, 297–316. S, M.P., P, K.T. & C, D.J.W. 1990. Restoration and evolution of the intermontane Indus molasse basin, Ladakh Himalaya, India. Tectonophysics, 174, 301–314. S, M.P., W, D.J., R, D.C. & W, R.N. 1992. Pressure, temperature and time constraints on Himalayan metamorphism from eastern Kashmir and western Zanskar. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 149, 753–773. S, M.P., W, B.F., C, M.P., C, D.J.W., R, A.D., R, D., T, L., X, X., J, M.Q., T, V. & K, S. 1987. The closing of Tethys and the tectonics of the Himalayas. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 98, 678–701. S, L., A, J.G., M, A.S. & K, W.S.F. 1998. Feedback between uplift, denudation, and tectonics at Nanga Parbat, western Himalayas. EOS Transactions, American Geophysical Union supplement: 1998 Fall Meeting, F 909. S, H.D., S, Z.R. & T, M.E. 1998. Carbonate sedimentation at the onset of foreland basin subsidence: The Eocene of the French Alps. In: W, P. & B, T. (eds) Carbonate Ramps. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 149, 205–227. T, V.C. 1981. Regional framework and geodynamic evolution of the Indus-Tsangpo suture zone in the Ladakh Himalayas. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 72, 89–97. T, V.C. & M, D.K. 1984. Tectonic framework of the Indus and Shyok suture zones in eastern Ladakh, northwest Himalaya. Tectonophysics, 101, 207–220. V H, T. 1984. Etude stratigraphique sedimentologique et structural d’un bassin d’avant arc: exemple du bassin de l’Indus, Ladakh, Himalaya. PhD thesis, University of Grenoble, France. W, R.B., W, O.E. & A, S. et al. 1974. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, Site 221, Vol 23. US Government Printing Office, Washington, 167–184. Z, P.K. 1985. Cooling history of the NW Himalaya, Pakistan. Tectonics, 4, 127–151. Z, P.K. & K, P.O. 1998. Nanga Parbat as tectonic aneurysm: a metamorphic signature of indentor-corner dynamics. EOS Transactions, American Geophysical Union supplement: 1998 Fall Meeting, F 910. Z, E-A. & T, A.B. 1974. Low grade regional metamorphism: Mineral equilibrium relations. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2, 179–212. Received 6 August 1999; revised typescript accepted 26 July 2000. Scientific editing by Duncan Pirrie.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz