CANSO Middle East Conference presentations day 2

Many thanks to
our host
Many thanks to
our Lead Sponsor
Meeting the Capacity
Challenge: MIDRAR
Alan Corner, Helios
Achim Baumann,
IATA
Mahmoud Ghaben
Carc
MIDRAR
Final Draft
28.03.12
Agenda
• MIDRAR objectives and scope
• Identifying challenges and opportunities
• Proposed MIDRAR initiatives
– Initiatives 1‐3 (airspace utilisation)
– Initiative 4 (FIR harmonisation)
– Initiative 5 (Management and implementation of MIDRAR initiatives)
• Next steps
Objectives
• Solve capacity challenges and improve efficiency in the Middle East airspace region’s ATM through a regional approach;
• Conduct gap analysis;
• Create a credible programme for remedial action;
• Manage implementation of programme; • Drive improvement of ATM through moving towards optimally designed airspace;
• Build consensus and buy‐in.
Geographical Scope
Specific MIDRAR challenges
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Bahrain ‘Hotspot’
Empty Quarter utilisation
Oman transition to Mumbai FIR
Increased access to Restricted Areas
FIR boundary interfaces
Access to North‐Eastern FIRs
Synchronisation with external influences/activities
Operationally focused ‐ need a regional approach ‐
specific enough to be resolved
Developing opportunities to meet the challenges
• Initially expected that specific opportunities would be developed to address individual challenges;
• Having identified and prioritised the challenges it was clear that most were inter‐related and that effort to address one would also have an impact on another;
• MIDRAR group agreed that opportunities should be combined and developed into 5 MIDRAR initiatives.
The MIDRAR Initiatives
Bahrain ‘Hotspot’
Empty Quarter utilisation
Oman Interface to Mumbai FIR
Increased access to Restricted Areas
FIR boundary interfaces
Access and capacity of
Syria, Iraq and Iran
Initiative 1 –
provide capacity South of Qatar Peninsular


()
()
Initiative 2 –
Increased utilisation of ‘Western Gulf’



()
()
()
()


()
Initiative 3 ‐
Increase access to North‐Eastern FIRs
Initiative 4 ‐ FIR harmonisation
Initiative 5 –
Management/ implementation
()
()
()
Sync with external influences/
activities

Initiative 1 ‐ Provide capacity South of the Qatar Peninsular
• Reduce congestion in the Muscat, Bahrain and UAE FIRs to the north of the Qatar peninsular (or the ‘Bahrain hotspot’)
• Relocate some of the routes to the south of the peninsular and into the north‐eastern part of the ‘empty quarter’;
• Opportunity to exploit new CNS infrastructure in ‘empty quarter’, improve use of current Hajj routes etc.
• Potential to deliver quick wins by implementing some previous proposals such as IATA REP, resectorising etc.
Initiative 2 ‐ Increased utilisation of the ‘Western Gulf’
• Builds on the ‘limited’ new route structure proposed in Initiative 1;
• Increased use of the ‘empty quarter’ to begin optimising some NW‐
SE routes potentially utilising airspace in the Muscat, Bahrain, UAE, Jeddah and even up to the Amman and Cairo FIRs if necessary;
• Will seek to improve efficiency of Muscat and Mumbai FIRs boundary;
• Several options possible ‐ introduction of additional/improved route structure, across more of the Arabian Peninsula and the adjacent Mediterranean coast and/or efficiency gains for East‐West traffic in North Africa (Libya, Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco) and areas of the African continent;
• Potential quick wins by exploiting and expanding initiatives such as iFlex.
Initiative 3 ‐ Increase access to North‐Eastern FIRs
• Aims to open up and make use of airspace in the north‐east of the Middle East region (Tehran, Baghdad and Damascus FIRs) to further increase capacity and provide more optimum routings;
• Approach is broadly similar and further builds on the first two initiatives but requires political support and will take longer to achieve;
• Can be developed in parallel and consider input from other initiatives.
Generic Initiative Structure
WP
Title
Description
WP1.1
Initial activities
WP1.1.1: Review current situation and assess need for change;
WP1.1.2: Re‐assess suitability of already existing previous and or current activities;
WP1.1.3: Conduct a feasibility and options study to determine potential approach. Determine capacity and demand for the airspace, in particular during peak periods and identify potential options. Identify key enablers including existing projects (such as the KSA surveillance project) and, if appropriate, new requirements;
WP1.1.4: Develop a business case based on the most likely option, buy‐in from stakeholders and seek funding;
WP1.1.5: Establish project.
WP1.2.1: Review and implement elements of IATA REP;
WP1.2
Implement existing proposals WP1.1.2: Review and implement route profile developed for Hajj operations in Bahrain, Muscat and Jeddah FIRs throughout the year.
WP1.3
Implementation of a ‘limited’ new route structure to accommodate peak demand
WP1.3.1: Develop and implement a ‘limited’ new route structure to the south of the Qatar Peninsular to accommodate traffic during peak demand. The implementation of routes can be incremental and should initially consider developing and seeking to implement additional RNAV routes through the Shaheen restricted area making use of airspace management arrangements for existing routes.
Your observations, comments and additional input on Initiatives 1‐3.… (please!)
Initiative 4 ‐ FIR harmonisation
• An overarching initiative ‐ coordination and, where possible, prioritisation of local or bi‐lateral projects to seek maximum benefit for the region (the sum of the whole is greater than that of the individual projects);
• Coordination between other CANSO working groups and regional organisations such as ICAO, IATA, ACAC or ACI;
• Support will lead to the implementation of best practice including data sharing (OLDI, Radar, AIDC etc.), operational concepts, common use of equipment etc;
• Help assess the impact of external activities (such as ASBU?) and assess the impact of internal environment changes such as airport expansion projects and airline growth.
Your observations, comments and additional input on Initiative 4.…
Initiative 5 ‐ Management and implementation
• How can the region ensure that the MIDRAR initiatives are successfully implemented?
• Must be broader than just a CANSO/ANSP initiative – it needs ‘buy‐in’ from States, ICAO, airlines, airports etc.
• Potential to develop a “regional implementation team” to coordinate the delivery of all regional projects – the MIDRAR initiatives could be the first….
The concept
Requirements ICAO
States
Delivery
‐
Delivery
‐
Industry
One potential approach….to be discussed
ICAO
MIDANPIRG
Requirements
SGs
TFs
[PMU]
States
Delivery
Projects and industry
Discuss…..
Next steps
1. Share current draft with MIDRAR stakeholders and seek input/comments;
2. Present working paper to MIDANPIRG on proposed PMU and how MIDRAR could be first ‘project’ to be implemented [Consider need to send a MIDRAR‐
specific working paper in addition];
3. Complete review challenges and initiatives with other stakeholders i.e. airlines
4. Update and produce final MIDRAR report by 30 April;
5. Support the establishment of a [PMU] and the implementation of the first MIDRAR initiatives.
Middle East Aviation
Development: The
Challenge
Rick Sharpe
Advisor, Aviation Business for Serco
Middle East / Transition Manager,
Baghdad
DEVELOPMENT OF IRAQ AIR TRAFFIC
CONTROL
Presented to:
Civil Air Navigation Services Organisation
Middle East CANSO Conference
26 – 28 March 2012
Advise | Design | Integrate | Deliver
Introduction
 Serco’s perspective
 My role
 About Serco in Iraq
Apologies
Mark Wordley
Contract Director
[email protected]
+964 780 204 1955
+971 56 683 9435
Recent History
 Recovery after 30 years of war,
sanctions, lack of investment etc.
 Post-conflict state of infrastructure
2011

Introduction of RVSM, 40 MIT to
20 MIT
 Focus on US Military withdrawal
 Beginning of move to ICAO
procedures
 Airspace changes, including
UP975
2012
 Focus on normalisation


Every area of operation, equipment,
training and support requires
attention
Huge demand for increased
capacity
 Danger of running before Iraq can
walk – safety implications
Challenges
 Patience to rebuild an entire ANSP
 Institutional and structural
arrangements not robust
 Knowledge and experience within ICAA
need time to meet international
standards
 Airspace requires restructuring – not an
Iraq-only issue
Southbound Flow
Northbound Flow
Challenges (cont’d)
 FIR interface – regular regional face-to-
face required to build confidence and
move issues along
 CNS issues will take time to implement
 Need operational workarounds in meantime
 2012 INFPL - Contingency arrangements
required
Challenges (cont’d)
 RVSM Implementation
 No change in north and southbound
flows
 Compliance issues with some aircraft
 In the absence of a formal ATFMU in
the Middle East, 40MIT mitigates the
flow
The Future
 Iraq recognises it has deficiencies
 Political understanding /
investment
 Fit for purpose organisation
 Open communication
The Future
 Regional flow management
 Regional trust
 Much work to do!
The Future
9
28
The Future
Work together
as professional aviation experts
to ensure safe, efficient and managed
aviation development……
…….but it will take time.
THANK YOU!
Middle East Aviation
Development: The
Challenge
Salah Moh’d Alhumood
Head, Aeronautical Information &
Airspace Planning
Bahrain - CAA
Bahrain Aeronautical Information Service
Transferring to AIM
Roadmap & strategy
2020
CANSO 26-28 March 2012
Cairo , Egypt
Presented by : Salah M. Alhumood
Head of Aeronautical Information Services & Airspace Planning
Civil Aviation Affairs
Air Navigation Directorate
CANSO Presentation
AIS/M
SUMMARY
This Presentation provides the information
on the development of the AIM Road Map
and necessary measures and action taken by
Bahrain for the transition from AIS to AIM.
CANSO Presentation
Strategy : CAA _ATM_AIM
The Vision : Safest Skies through exceptional Air Traffic
Management and Briefing during all phases of flight (G2G)
The Mission: To provide a uniform and efficient
aeronautical information management structure,
based on system wide information management, in
order Provide safe and efficient Air Navigation
Services through the best utilization of the
resources
CANSO Presentation
History
AIS-AIM SG
AIS-AIM transition roadmap
• Roadmap completed
• Noted by ANC, States informed
• Posted on ICAO NET and MET-AIM sites
AIS/AIM Planning in the MID Region
• MIDANPIRG 11/12
• Conc. 11/51: Pre-requisites for the transition to AIM
• Dec. 11/52: Planning for the transition from AIS to AIM
• AIS/MAP TF/5 (Tehran, 5-7 May 09)
• Conc. 5/11: Hosting of the global AIM Congress
Future Work Programme
• 2010 - Annex 15 AMDT 36, Annex 4 AMDT 56
(implemented)
• State letter AN 2/2.2-09/13
• 2013 - Annex 15 AMDT 37, Annex 4 AMDT 57
• 2013/14 Divisional type meeting
Roadmap Timeline
AIS development -
Increasing Information Scope
AIM
Strategy
Phase1: Consolidation
Study group
Established
Amendment 36 of Annex 15
Amendment 56 of Annex 4
Amendment 2 of Doc 8126
Annex 15
Traditional
AIS
-Product by
Papers
-Limited
scope
IM
Strategy
Phase3: IM Begin 2012
Propose
Amendment 37 of Annex 15
Amendment 57 of Annex 4
Phase 2 : Going Digital Applicable
Amendment 36 of Annex 15
Amendment 56 of Annex 4
Preparing
Amendment 37 of Annex 15
Amendment 57 of Annex 4
Providing Aeronautical
Information Via Internet
ICAO Doc 9855 "Guidelines for the use of the public
internet for Aeronautical Applications"
1947 -
2008 / 2012 Bahrain
CAA , AIM Iraq Delegation Presentation 23-25 Jan 2011
Applicable 2013
Amendment 37 of Annex 15
Amendment 57 of Annex 4
Applicable 2016
Amendment 38 of Annex 15
Amendment 58 of Annex 4
2012/16
Annex 15
Aeronautical Information Service
1. Aeronautical Information Publication AIP
2. NOTAM
3. Aeronautical Information Regulation and
Control (AIRAC)
4. Aeronautical Information Circulars ( AIC)
5. Pre-flight and Post –Flight Information (PIB)
6. Telecommunication Requirements (AFTN,,)
7. Electronic Terrain and Obstacle DATA (eTOD)
AIS to AIM
AIS at the Past
AIM at the Present
WEB
PIB FPL
FPL
ISO
NOF
AIP
PANS
OPS\ATM\AIM
Admin Data
SLA
Data set
SDO
PIB
FPL
ISO
NOF
AIP
HTML
Public
services
eTOD
eChart
eText
Moni
Anx 15& 4
Geo Graphic NOTAM Briefing
ARINC424
AIS Past Situation
Problems
1.Multiple entry points of information
2.Multiple Coordination / Evaluation = multiple results
3.Multiple Communication method
4.Inconsistency between the products
5.Inconsistency within the product (AIP text vs. chart)
6.Limited output (no datasets available)
7.No clear data ownership (lack of SLA)
8.No clear duties & responsibilities
Former AIP Production
Originator
&
Regulator
Coordination
NOF
NOTAM DB
AIP
NOTAM
PUB.
AIP Print
& Distr.
Customer
CHT
Provider
CHT
Data
Input
SDO (Static Data Organization)
Output
New Data Operation
NOTAM
PUB.
NOF
AIP Text
Originator
&
Regulator
&
Provider
AIP Text
SDC
CHT
Logistic
Customer
Coordination
SDMT
SDO
Digital data chain
AIM Portal
Input
CHT data
SDO (Static Data Organization)
Output
Evolution
Improvement
- Single Point of Entry (SDC)
- One Coordination / Evaluation = one result
- Less verbal Communication vs. agreed written
format (AIM Portal )
- Automated workflow / documentation / processes
- Improved Consistency between the products
-Consistency within the product (AIP text vs. chart)
- Multiple output (AIP & datasets available)
- Clear Data Ownership (SLA)
- Clear Duties & Responsibilities
Vision
- Integration of the NOTAM Office into the Data Process
- Moving from Static Data Operation to Data Operation by
including Dynamic Data as well
- Single BCAA data store
- Common coordination for all sub processes
- Web based formal Originator Requests (CR Via AIM Portal)
- Data Regulation (Full SLA Implementation )
- Centralized electronic Archiving
- Variable customer defined products (customized datasets,
customized Web publication, LATSI, AOM etc.)
Vision
Data
Originator
&
Regulator
&
Provider
&
Customer
NOTAM
DC
AIP
Text
DMT
Logistic
Coordination
CHT
Customer
Revision Control
Data
GeoData
Digital data chain
Input
…
DO (Data Organization)
Output
AIS-AIM Transition Roadmap
• Phase 1: Consolidation (2009)
Phase 2: Going digital (2011-2014)
Phase 3: Information Management (2012-2016)
AIS-AIMSG/1
AIS-AIM transition roadmap
Phase 1: Consolidation
•
•
•
•
P-03 AIRAC Adherence monitoring
P-04 Monitoring Annexes 4,15 differences
P-05 WGS84 Implementation
P-17 Quality Management System
Phase 2: Going digital
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
P-01Data Integrity monitoring
P-02Data Quality monitoring
P-06Integrated aeronautical information Database
P-07Unique identifiers
P-08AICM
P-11Electronic AIP
P-13Terrain
P-14Obstacles
P-15Aerodrome mapping
(Aeronautical information conceptual model)
Phase 3: Information Management
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
P-09 Aeronautical Data Exchange
P-10 Communication networks
P-12 Aeronautical Information Briefing
P-16 Training
P-18 Agreements Data Originators
P-19 Interoperability with MET products
P-20 Electronic Aeronautical charts
P-21 Digital NOTAM
Discussions
Bahrain AIM Road Map Development Steps
1. Vision for Bahrain AIM was finalized and recorded
2. Analysis of the template was done and Company was appointed to
review the template and to provide necessary advice and guidance
on the Roadmap.
3. Bahrain AIM Road Map implementation Action plan was drawn
up for the implementation of the Roadmap
4. Staff briefed on all aspects of the Roadmap and training sessions
were conducted to all staff in Bahrain AIS.
Discussions
Continue
Bahrain AIM Road Map Development Steps
1. In parallel to staff briefing and training, a culture of change from
AIS to AIM has been created among all the staff and this is a
continues process
2. All Staff were appraised with ICAO Standards indicating the
approach of competency without licensing
3. The AIM concept was introduced the management indicating the
need to consider the AIM at the same level of the ATM during the
process of the re-structuring.
4. First draft of Bahrain AIM Road Map developed on 1st October
2009 and provided to the ICAO Regional Office. The target date
for the completion of AIM is December 2012.(AIM Audit)
Roadmap Timeline
•
BCAA implementation of the transition to AIM. In this part, supported by ICAO transition to AIM and the Global Air
Traffic Management Operational Concept initiatives related to the management of aeronautical information.
•
December 2008 Phase 1 — Consolidation, has begun with the establishment of the AIS-AIM Study Group. The consultation
process for Amendment 36 to Annex 15 and Amendment 56 of Annex 4 are initiated in the first quarter of 2009. The
development of Amendment 2 to the AIS Manual (Doc 8126) and Amendment 30 to the PANS-ABC (Doc 8400) has begun to
introduce guidance on best practices already available.
•
November 2009 Phase 2 – Going digital will begin by the development of new guidance material related (electronic AIP,
aeronautical information conceptual model, training, quality) that will be developed with the support of the AIS-AIMSG .
•
November 2010 Amendment 36 of Annex 15 and Amendment 56 of Annex 4 would become applicable. The preparation of
Amendment 37 to Annex 15 and Amendment 57 to Annex 4 plus any consequential amendments required in other annexes
will have progresses with the help of the AIS-AIMSG.
•
October 2011 Phase 3 — Information management, will begin with the fourth meeting of the AIS-AIMSG which will finalise
the proposals for amendment 37 to Annex 15 and amendment 57 of Annex4.
•
The consultation process of Amendment 37 to Annex 15 and Amendment 57 to Annex 4 will be initiated in the first quarter
of 2012.
•
November 2013 Amendment 37 to Annex 15 and Amendment 57 to Annex 4 would become applicable, Possible divisionaltype meeting should a substantial number of subjects of worldwide scope involving meteorological, aeronautical information
and supporting communication network fields need to be agreed in order to finalize the transition to AIM. This could
include a substantial enlargement of the scope of aeronautical information required by ATM and an obligation to provide
the information in the form of digital data.
•
November 2016 Amendment 38 to Annex 15 and Amendment 58 to Annex 4 would become applicable including the
recommendations of the divisional meeting.
Recommendations
For Future Strategic
• Transition to IM through AIM
• Enhanced IM Concept System
• Expanded in the service
• More commercial development opportunities
(DB)
• Roadmap
• Connect with the world
Project Completed in year 2008-11
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Electronic Log AIS/M
Electronic Doc eAIM
Electronic Hand Over
Electronic wAIP
Competency .
Doha direct line
Prepare complete Draft Study for Firework Obligation .
Gulf Air Dispatch visit
Roster Development
Bahrain AIP available on CD
PDTool Kit training
Bahrain to be consider D NOTAM provider
initiate SLA (Service Level Agreement )
Implementation of SIDS/STARS at Bahrain International Airport
Projects/Plans for the year 2012
• AIM Automation (Total Operation Concept Change )
• Implementation of Electronic Terrain, Obstacle Data Base
(eTOD).
• Procedure Design tender (PANS-OPS)
• Selection, recruitment and training of AIM technicians.
• Update approach plats
• Electronic library
• IFPS
• INFPL
• WGS84 Survey update
• MIDAD
• AMDB
End
Towards AIM
Electronic AIP
Visit BCAA web site
www.caa.gov.bh/ais
an electronic HTML AIP Available AIRAC 05/12
Effective date 03/5/2012
Its become the sole source provision of Bahrain aeronautical information
Thank You