12/20/2013 ASA, CSSA, SSSA International Annual Meeting, Nov 3-6, 2013, Tampa, FL Symposium: Wireless Technologies and Innovations To Meet Food, Water, and Energy Challenges: I Martin A. Hebel Associate Professor Electronic Systems Technologies Southern Illinois University Carbondale 1 12/20/2013 About the Presenter Wireless Sensor Networks RF Signal Power & Isotropic Radiators Free Space Losses Antenna Types, Design & Gain Reflections & Multipath Issues Fresnel Zone & Signal Clearance Signal Absorption Wireless Nodes and Mesh Networks Conclusion 2 12/20/2013 Technologist & Educator at Southern Illinois University (SIU). Collaborations using wireless network include: ◦ Agricultural Sciences at SIU, RF signal testing. ◦ University of Florida, wireless citrus vibration monitoring during harvesting. ◦ USDA, Bushland, Tx, Infrared crop infrared canopy monitoring for center-pivot irrigation using wireless networks. ◦ University of Sassari, Italy: Wireless biometric monitoring using parallel processing. Primary Author of Getting Started with XBee Modules on programming for communications with XBee wireless transceivers. 3 12/20/2013 Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) is a collection of inexpensive, low-power transceivers used to transmit sensor and control information. Commonly use Low-Rate, Wireless Personal Area Network (LR-WPAN) protocol (IEEE-802.15.4), and ZigBee protocols at higher layers. Optimized for WSN use. Other protocols may be used, such as BlueTooth (IEEE 802.15.1), WiFi (IEEE 802.11), or others. 4 12/20/2013 The LR-WPAN protocols provide point-topoint communications. The ZigBee protocols (and others) provide mesh networking and routing of data. Typically operate in the 2.4GHz ISM band, though 900Mhz is popular as well. 5 12/20/2013 Signal power is important in gauging the distance that may covered with the wireless network. Transmitter power commonly ranges from 1mW (0 dBm) to 100mW (20 dBm). The allowed maximum for 2.4Ghz, including antenna gain, is 4W (36dBm). Common minimum detectable signal power at the receiver is around 0.1pW (-100 dBm) 6 12/20/2013 dBm is power in decibels (dB) referenced to 1mW, such that 1mW = 0dBm dBm = 10Log(Power/1mw) +3dB is a doubling of power -3dB is a halving of power A signal strength of -6dBm is -3dB + -3dB 1mW / 2 / 2 = 0.25 mW +10dB is an increase in power of 10 times -10dB is a decrease in power of 10 times. A signal strength of 20dBm is +10dB+ 10dB 1mW x 10 x 10 = 100mW 7 12/20/2013 While a transmitter may transmit 100mW of power, the power at the receiver is critical in the communications link. The isotropic point source is a theoretical antenna that emits power equally in all directions (perfectly omni-directional). 8 12/20/2013 ◦ The loss of signal in free space is directly proportional to the square of the distance and square of the frequency. ◦ Calculating Free Space Loss (FSPL): ◦ d is distance in meters f is frequency in Hertz c is speed of light, 3 x 108 m/s ◦ Typically reported in dB: 10Log(FSPL) 9 12/20/2013 For a 2.4GHz signal at 1Km, the loss would be approximately 100dB. Based on a transmitter with power of 0dBm to 20 dB and a receiver with a sensitivity of 100dBm, it would appear our signal could be received at a distance of 1km. This is based on an isotropic point source through free space. 10 12/20/2013 Antennas can be omni-directional or directional. Due to alignment needs of directional antennas, omni-directional are typically used. Unlike the theoretical isotropic antenna, real antennas focus more energy in certain directions. Antenna power is measured in dBi – power (gain) referenced to an isotropic source. An antenna of 3dBi would have twice the power in the radiated directions as compared to the isotropic. 11 12/20/2013 The Dipole antenna is a common omni-directional antenna. ◦ Typically sized ½ the wavelength of the signal. The wavelength of a 2.4GHz wave is 12.5cm ( = c / f = speed of light / frequency) The antenna therefore would be 6.25cm. Made up from two ¼ wavelength segments. ◦ The radiation pattern is donut shaped. ◦ Typical gain value of 2.15dBi. (Ref 1) (Ref 2) 12 12/20/2013 Monopole antennas are essentially ½ a dipole ( /4), with the ground plane acting as the other pole. Often called whip or wire antennas (such as automobile antennas). Radiation pattern is similar to the dipole, but the shape is affected by the ground plane size. Gain is dependent on ground plane size. For small devices a value of 1.5dBi is typically, but for broadcast antennas can reach 6dBi. (Ref 2) 13 12/20/2013 Chips Antenna are very low profile, but have uneven radiation patterns and gain values of -1.5dBi are common. 14 12/20/2013 Directional antenna focus energy in certain directions. Yagi-Uda antenna. ◦ Gains of 15dBi or more can be achieved. (Ref 2) ◦ Parabolic dish antennas can achieve gains of 60dBi. 15 12/20/2013 With antenna gain, the power budget includes the gains at the transmitter and receiver. PR = PT + GT – FSPL + GR For 2.4GHz at 1km, with a 100mW transmitter and through free space, using dipole antennas on each end: PR = 20dBm – 100dB + 2.15dB + 2.15dB = -75.7dBm 16 12/20/2013 The longer the wavelength (lower the frequency), the further it goes. The longer the wavelength (lower the frequency), the better it travels through and around objects. The shorter the wavelength (higher the frequency), the more data it can transport. * Adapted from Ref 3. 17 12/20/2013 Based on only free-space loss, it would appear that 2 antennas, 1km apart, with lineof-sight (LOS), would only have a loss of around 100dB. Other factors such as reflections (even with directional antennas), will affect the power budget. 18 12/20/2013 Reflections reaching the receivers can dramatically affect the received signal due to signals arriving on different paths causing multipath issues. Waves from the source arriving in different paths can cause constructive interference (waves aid each other), and destructive interference (wave cancel each other). Time delays based on distances travelled on different paths can also lead to data issues. 19 12/20/2013 Major sources of reflections are metals and water (moisture in materials or covering materials, such as dew). These can be the most difficult to plan for. (Ref. 4) 20 12/20/2013 Fresnel Zones define the areas of highest reflections. While different zones exist, typically the 1st zone is of most concern. If 60% of the radius (r) of the zone is kept clear, it will be a good approximation of free space. (Ref. 4) 21 12/20/2013 The radius for 2.4GHz can be found with the formula: At a distance of 1km, rm calculates to be 5.6 meters. Keeping at least 60% clear, would require a clearance height of at least 3.35 meters. 22 12/20/2013 The signal strength at receivers for 2.4GHz devices were tested for distances up to 200 meters with varying antenna heights from 0.25m to 2.0m (Ref 5). Tested with a 1mW transmitter (0dBm) over a mowed, grass plain. (Ref. 5) 23 12/20/2013 The permittivity, or dielectric constant, of a material defines how well it pass RF signals. At 2.4GHz, water is a major absorber of the energy. Moisture in materials can dramatically affect signal strength. To test non-metallic materials to find out if they absorb 2.4GHz energy, try to heat the material in a microwave oven – which operates at 2.4GHz. 24 12/20/2013 Researchers at the citrus research center at the University of Florida noted lower receiver power levels in the early morning hours as compared to later in the day. This was attributed to dew in the area which burnt off as the morning progressed. 25 12/20/2013 Nodes on the WSN can use inexpensive RF transceiver (such as the XBee) containing the protocol stack. For the device application, it is coupled with a microcontroller programmed to interact with the real-world devices and communicate to the transceiver. (Ref. 6) 26 12/20/2013 Wireless Sensor Networks may use a mesh network architecture, such as ZigBee, to span distances. Router Nodes may be used to move data between end nodes. (Ref. 5) 27 12/20/2013 When implementing a wireless system, some losses due to distance and gains based on antennas used can be estimated and factored into the planning. Issues of reflections and multipath signals, can be reduced by understanding Fresnel zones. Moisture, being a major absorber and reflector of RF energy, is of major concern in agricultural environments. 28 12/20/2013 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole_antenna 2: http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/dipole.php 3: (2013) Wireless Networking in the Developing World, 3rd Ed. http://wndw.net 4: Hebel, M. A., Bricker, G. (2010). Getting started with Xbee RF Modules. Parallax, Inc., Rocklin, CA. 5: Hebel, M. A., Tate, R. F, & Watson, D. G. (2007). Results of wireless sensor network transceiver testing for agricultural applications. ASABE International Meeting, Minneapolis, Mn. 6: Hebel, M. A. (2006). Meeting Wide-Area Agricultural Data Acquisition And Control Challenges Through Zigbee Wireless Network Technology. 4th Annual WCCA Conference, Orlando, FL. 29
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz