Appendix to the Major Assessment Report for the Anderson University Social Work Program
Submitted to the Anderson University Majors Assessment Committee
1-2013
1. Upon completion of the Anderson University Social Work Program students will demonstrate
knowledge needed to secure employment in entry-level generalist social work practice and to
gain admission to graduate studies in social work or a related field.
a. Students will understand various forms and mechanisms of oppression, discrimination, and social
injustice and comprehend their impact on social problems and human functioning.
ACAT – Sections on Diversity, Populations-At-Risk, and Social & Economic Justice.
The graduating class will achieve a score at or above the 50%ile.
Data not available until 2009.
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
Diversity
45
60
72
Populations-At-Risk
70
69
68
Social & Economic Justice
71
68
63
On BEAP Exit Survey items D1, D2 & D3 the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
D1
D2
D3
Superb
9
2008
7.94
7.83
7.50
2009
7.91
8.09
7.91
2010
7.8
7.5
8.10
2011
7.25
7.75
7.58
2012
7.67
7.33
7.07
10
How well prepared have you been in
D1. Theories about clients of diversity.
D2. The forms and mechanisms of oppression and discrimination.
D3. Theories and policy in advancing social and economic justice.
On BEAP Alumni Survey items C1, C2 & C 3 the mean score will exceed 6.0
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
C1
C2
C3
2008
6.67
6.83
6.60
2009
x
x
x
2010
7.63
8.00
8.13
2011
6.25
7.0
6.75
2012
7.0
7.29
6.86
10
How well prepared were you in
C1. Theories about clients of diversity.
C2. The forms and mechanisms of oppression and discrimination.
C3. Theories and policy in advancing social and economic justice.
Major Assessment Report, AU SW Program
1-2013
Page 1 of 16
b. Students will be able to identify major influences in the evolution of the social work profession as
it has moved into its contemporary format.
On BEAP Exit Survey items D4, D5, & D6 the mean score will exceed 6.0
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
D4
D5
D6
2008
7.67
8.22
8.22
2009
7.82
7.91
7.45
2010
7.2
7.6
7.7
2011
7.5
8.0
7.42
2012
6.8
7.07
7.33
C4
C5
C6
2008
7.0
7.33
7.50
2009
x
x
x
2010
8.75
7.88
8.63
2011
6.25
7.25
7.50
2012
7.0
7.43
7.57
10
How well prepared have you been in
D4. The history of social work.
D5. Current organizations & associations in the social work profession.
D6. Current issues of the social work profession.
On BEAP Alumni Survey items C4, C5, &
C6 the mean score will exceed 6.0
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
10
How well prepared were you in
C4. The history of social work.
C5. Current organizations & associations in the social work profession.
C6. Current issues of the social work profession.
c. Students will use theoretical frameworks supported by empirical evidence to understand
individual development and behavior across the life span and the interactions among individuals
and between individuals and families, groups, organizations, and communities.
ACAT- Sections on HBSE
The graduating class will achieve a score at or above the 50%ile.
Data was not available until 2009
Human Behavior in Social Environment
On BEAP Exit Survey items D7, D8, D9, D10, D11, & D12 the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
10
D7
D8
D9
D10
D11
D12
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
50
66
67
2008
7.94
8.28
8.22
7.94
7.94
7.67
2009
8.36
8.55
8.6
8.33
8.45
8.0
2010
7.8
7.9
7.9
7.4
7.7
7.5
2011
7.75
7.5
7.5
7.17
7.45
7.33
2012
7.67
7.6
7.6
7.27
7.07
6.73
How well prepared have you been in
D7. Theories about the bio-psycho-social development of individuals.
D8. Theories about family development.
D9. Theories about group development.
D10. Theories about organizational development.
D11. Theories about community development.
D12. The interactions among different-sized social systems.
Major Assessment Report, AU SW Program
1-2013
Page 2 of 16
On BEAP Alumni Survey items C7, C8, C9, C10, C11, & C12 the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
10
2008
7.0
7.17
7.17
6.67
7.0
7.0
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
2009
x
x
x
x
x
x
2010
8.63
8.63
8.25
7.88
8.38
8.38
2011
7.25
7.0
7.25
6.75
6.75
6.50
2012
7.29
7.29
7.14
6.71
6.86
7.29
How well prepared were you in
C7. Theories about the bio-psycho-social development of individuals.
C8. Theories about family development.
C9. Theories about group development.
C10. Theories about organizational development.
C11. Theories about community development.
C12. The interactions among different-sized social systems.
On BEAP Employer Survey items 7, 8, 9, & 10 the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
Adequate
Good
Very
Superb
Poor
Good
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
7
8
9
10
2008
6.75
6.75
6.75
6.75
2009
x
x
x
x
2010
7.75
7.75
7.00
7.00
2011
9.0
10.0
8.0
8.0
2012
7.67
7.67
7.67
7.67
How well does the employee demonstrate the following ability?
7. Uses theoretical frameworks to understand individual development.
8. Uses theoretical frameworks to understand families.
9. Uses theoretical frameworks to understand groups.
10. Uses theoretical frameworks to understand organizations.
d. Students will understand the formulation and implementation of social policies and the impact of
policy on personal and social systems.
ACAT- Section on Policy & Services
The graduating class will achieve a score at or above the 50%ile
Data was not available until 2009
Policy & Services
On BEAP Employer Survey items 11 & 12 the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
45
60
52
11.
12.
2008
7.25
7.50
2009
x
x
2010
8.00
8.25
2011
8.0
8.0
2012
8.50
8.25
Superb
9
10
How well does the employee demonstrate the following ability?
11. Analyzes impact of social policies on individuals, families, and groups.
12. Analyzes impact of social policies on organizations and communities.
A random sampling of SOWK 3100 Policy Analysis papers will be reviewed by 2 faculty
members using a rubric. (See Policy Analysis Rubric, Volume III, Appendix 9 ) The
sampling group will achieve a mean score of 2.5 on a 4 point scale for Rubric Items 1-4.
No data available until 2009.
2009
2.7
2010
2.5
2011
2.7
2012
2.7
e. Students will understand research and statistical concepts that are pertinent to evaluating social
work practice.
Major Assessment Report, AU SW Program
1-2013
Page 3 of 16
ACAT- Section on Research Methods
The graduating class will achieve a score at or above the 50%ile.
Data not available until 2009
Research Methods
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
62
66
54
2. Upon completion of the Anderson University Social Work Program students will demonstrate
core social work competencies for practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and
communities.
a. Students will identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly.
On BEAP Exit Survey item B4 students who are seeking employment will be seeking social
work employment. Fewer than 10 % will respond “not in social work”.
B4. If you are seeking employment, where are you seeking a position?
•
In social work
•
Not in social work
•
Either one
On BEAP Exit Survey item C2, 80% of the students who plan to go on to graduate
school will plan to pursue a MSW.
In SW
Not
SW
Either
Plan to Pursue
MSW
2008
44.4
5.6
2009
72.7
9.1
2010
70.0
0.0
2011
33.3
0.0
2012
45.5
9.1
16.7
18.2
20.0
25.0
45.5
2008
83.3
2009
85.7
2010
100
2011
90.0
2012
62.5
2008
100
2009
x
2010
100
2011
100
2012
60
0
x
0
0
0
100
x
100
100
60
C2. If you anticipate further study, which of the following degree programs do you
plan to enter? (Mark ALL that apply)
•
Additional Bachelor’s
•
MSW
•
Other Master’s
•
Doctorate in Social Work
•
Other Doctorate
On BEAP Alumni Survey item A5, 75% of employed respondents will have either full
or part time employment in social work.
A5. If currently employed, please indicate ALL of the options below that apply to you.
•
Full Time in Social Work
•
Part Time in Social Work
•
Full Time, not in Social Work
•
Part Time, not in Social Work
On BEAP Alumni Survey item D1, 25% of respondents will have applied
to an MSW Program in the two years since completing their BSW.
Applied to
MSW
Full-Time
SW
Part-Time
SW
Total
2008
83.3
2009
x
2010
62.5
2011
75
2012
71.4
D1. Since graduation, have you applied to an MSW program?
Major Assessment Report, AU SW Program
1-2013
Page 4 of 16
On the BEAP Alumni Survey item E1, 75% of respondents will have
participated in 1 or more professional activities since BSW graduation.
E1. Since you completed your undergraduate social work degree, in which
of the following professional activities have you participated? (Mark ALL
that apply.)
•
NASW Membership
•
Membership in another social work association
•
Membership in a professional association outside of social work
•
Enrolled in a continuing education/non-credit course
•
Enrolled in a graduate/for-credit course
•
Presented a talk to a community group
•
Conducted a workshop
•
Involved in community service projects, agency boards,
committees, task forces, etc.
•
Participated in writing proposals for grants or funding for
professional activities
1 or more
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
100
x
100
100
100
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
7.75
x
7.50
10.0
Data
missing
from
report.
On BEAP Employer Survey item 3, the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
1
Poor
Adequate
Good
2
3
6
4
5
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
3.
10
How well does the employee demonstrate the following ability?
3. Demonstrates professional use of self.
On the Practicum Evaluation, Section 1, each practicum cohort will
achieve a mean score of 3
5 Excellent, 4 Very good, 3 Good, 2 Poor, 1 Unsatisfactory
1.
1a
1b.
1c.
1d.
1e.
1f.
1g.
1h.
1i.
1j.
1k.
1l.
The student:
identifies as a professional social worker and
conducts her/his self accordingly.
understands the history and function of the host
agency/institution within the community.
understands the role of the social worker in the host
agency.
demonstrates knowledge of the agency’s organizational
structure and funding sources
obtained information about other social services
available for consumers served by the host agency
demonstrated a commitment to use best practices as
defined by professional research and literature.
demonstrated a commitment to alleviate poverty,
oppression, and other forms of social injustice.
met the work expectations of the host agency.
presented oneself in a professional manner in
interactions with staff and clients.
differentiated between personal, professional, and social
roles.
used supervision and consultation to increase practice
knowledge.
used supervision to increase self-awareness of
professional strengths and areas for growth.
demonstrated a commitment to one’s own continuing
education and lifelong learning for professional
development.
1.
1a.
1b.
1c.
1d.
1e.
1f.
1g.
1h.
1i.
1j.
1k.
1l.
2009
4.6
2010
4.4
2011
4.3
2012
4.3
4.7
4.7
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.6
4.8
4.8
4.6
4.7
4.5
4.6
4.5
4.7
4.4
4.5
4.4
4.3
4.8
4.6
4.7
4.6
4.6
4.7
4.4
4.5
3.9
4.3
4.5
4.6
4.3
4.6
4.5
4.3
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.7
4.3
4.5
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.6
Major Assessment Report, AU SW Program
1-2013
Page 5 of 16
b. Students will adhere to the National Association of Social Worker’s Social Work Code of Ethics
and provide value sensitive services to consumers.
On BEAP Employer Survey item 1, the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
5
Good
6
7
Very
Good
8
2008
7.25
2009
x
2010
8.50
2011
10
2012
8.50
2008
+26%
+25.5%
2009
+20%
+20.5%
2010
2011
2012
The BEAP SW Values
Inventory was
discontinued in 2010.
+12%
+6.5
Superb
9
10
How well does the employee demonstrate the following ability?
1. Practices within the values & ethics of the social work profession.
On BEAP Social Work Values Inventory there will be a 10% improvement in
the mean scores on each scale (confidentiality, self-determination, and social
justice) between the sophomore year aggregate and the senior aggregate.
Confidentiality
Selfdetermination
Social Justice
ACAT- section on Values
The graduating class will achieve a score at or above the 50%ile.
Data not available until 2009
Values and Ethics
On the Practicum Evaluation, Section 2, each practicum cohort will achieve a mean
score of 3
5 Excellent, 4 Very good, 3 Good, 2 Poor, 1 Unsatisfactory
2009-10
69
2.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2010-11
67
2009
4.8
4.8
4.5
4.7
4.7
2011-12
61
2010
4.5
4.6
4.6
4.4
4.5
2011
4.4
4.4
4.1
4.5
4.4
2012
4.7
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
The student
2.
adhered to the National Association of Social Worker’s Social
Work Code of Ethics and provided value sensitive services to
consumers.
2a.
Applied the NASW Code of Ethics to interactions with clients,
colleagues, and community contacts
2b.
Identified values that influence consumers’ perceptions and
choices.
2c.
Identified how his/her own values help or interfere with
social work practice.
2d.
Recognized and responded appropriately to value and ethical
dilemmas encountered in the host agency.
c. Students will apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments.
On the Practicum Evaluation, Section 3, each practicum cohort will achieve a mean score of 3
5 Excellent, 4 Very good, 3 Good, 2 Poor, 1 Unsatisfactory
The student
3.
applied critical thinking to inform and communicate professional
judgments.
3a.
identified what problem, question, or issue needs to be addressed.
3b.
collected relevant information.
3c.
accurately interpreted the context related to the problem, question, or
issue.
3d.
developed a plausible response that considers and weighs the needs
of everyone involved.
3e.
communicated pertinent information to the appropriate persons.
3.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
2009
4.5
4.4
4.5
4.4
4.3
4.0
2010
4.6
4.7
4.6
4.3
4.5
4.6
2011
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.0
4.3
4.3
2012
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.4
4
Major Assessment Report, AU SW Program
1-2013
Page 6 of 16
A random sampling of SOWK 3100 Policy Analysis papers will be reviewed by 2 faculty
members using a rubric. (See Critical Thinking Grid, Volume III, Appendix 10 ) The sampling
group will achieve a mean score of 2.5 on a 4 point scale for all items on the grid.
2009
2010
2011
2012
2.6
2.8
2.7
2.8
Data was not available until 2009.
d. Students will engage diversity and difference in practice.
On BEAP Exit Survey items D13, D22, & D30 the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
D13
D22
D30
2008
7.83
8.17
9.22
2009
7.45
8.73
8.73
2010
7.7
8.0
8.4
2011
7.92
8.17
8.50
2012
7.47
8
8.53
C13
C22
C30
2008
6.83
7.83
8.17
2009
x
x
x
2010
7.88
8.50
9.38
2011
5.75
7.75
9.50
2012
7.29
8.14
8.57
10
How well prepared have you been in
D13. Applying interventions that include issues about diversity to specific client situations.
D22. Using communication skills based on needs related to diversity & different abilities.
D30. Respecting cultural & social diversity.
On BEAP Alumni Survey items C13, C22, & C30 the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
10
How well prepared were you in
C13. Applying interventions that include issues about diversity to specific client situations.
C22. Using communication skills based on needs related to diversity & different abilities.
C30. Respecting cultural & social diversity.
On BEAP Employer Survey item 2, the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
4.
2008
6.50
2009
x
2010
7.75
2011
10
2012
8.50
4.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
2009
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.8
2010
4.25
4.5
4.4
4.6
4.6
2011
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.6
Superb
9
10
How well does the employee demonstrate the following ability?
2. Practices with an understanding, respect, and appreciation for diversity.
On the Practicum Evaluation, Section 4, each practicum cohort will achieve a mean score of 3
5 Excellent, 4 Very good, 3 Good, 2 Poor, 1 Unsatisfactory
The student
4.
engaged diversity and difference in practice.
4a.
demonstrated an awareness of and a respect for the positive value of human
commonalities and differences, especially in relation to age, class, color, culture,
disability, ethnicity, family structure, gender, marital status, national origin, race,
religion, sex, sexual orientation, physical and mental ability, and socio-economic
status.
4b.
utilized knowledge of the distinct characteristics and needs of others to guide
interaction with them.
4c.
pursued information that will enhance his/her understanding of the diversity
encountered while working at the host agency.
4d.
respected and utilized the knowledge shared by clients, supervisors, and colleagues for
professional growth.
2012
4.7
4.7
4.6
4.5
4.5
Major Assessment Report, AU SW Program
1-2013
Page 7 of 16
ACAT- section on Diversity
The graduating class will achieve a score at or above the 50%ile.
Data was not available until 2009-10.
Diversity
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
45
60
72
e. Students will advance human rights and social and economic justice.
On BEAP Exit Survey items D35 the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Go
od
5
6
7
Ver
y
Go
od
8
D35
2008
9.28
2009
8.18
2010
8.4
2011
8.33
2012
7.93
C35
2008
8.67
2009
x
2010
9.38
2011
9.0
2012
8.29
2010
4.3
4.5
4.5
4.3
2011
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.6
2012
4.4
4.3
4
4.2
Superb
9
10
How well prepared have you been in
D35. Promoting social and economic justice.
On BEAP Alumni Survey items C35 the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Go
od
5
6
7
Ver
y
Go
od
8
Superb
9
10
How well prepared were you in
C35. Promoting social and economic justice.
On the Practicum Evaluation, Section 5, each practicum cohort will achieve a mean score of
3.
5 Excellent, 4 Very good, 3 Good, 2 Poor, 1 Unsatisfactory
The student
5.
worked to advance human rights and social and economic justice.
5a.
assessed unmet needs, oppression, or injustice experienced by
consumers or employees associated with the host agency.
5b.
developed a plan to address the concern.
5c.
advocated for needed change.
On the Practicum Application more than 50% of a practicum cohort will list activities they
have engaged in that advance human rights and social and economic justice. Data was not
available until 2009.
2009
4.4
4.5
4.4
4.5
5
5a.
5b.
5c.
2009
2010
2011
2012
10/11
91%
10/10
100%
13/13
100%
11/12
92%
Major Assessment Report, AU SW Program
1-2013
Page 8 of 16
f.
Students will engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research.
On BEAP Exit Survey items D19, D20, & D21 the mean score will
exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
1
Poor
Adequate
Good
2
3
6
4
5
7
Very
Good
8
D19
D20
D21
2008
7.17
6.94
8.11
2009
7.64
7.64
8.09
2010
7.1
7.2
7.8
2011
7.08
6.83
7.75
2012
6.67
6.87
7.87
C19
C20
C21
2008
5.50
5.67
7.00
2009
x
x
x
2010
6.88
6.88
8.63
2011
6.50
6.25
7.50
2012
6.43
6.29
7.57
14
15
16
2008
6.75
7.25
7.00
2009
x
x
2010
5.75
7.00
7.25
2011
7.0
8.0
8.0
2012
7.75
8.00
8.25
Superb
9
10
How well prepared have you been in
D19. Evaluating research studies.
D20. Applying the findings of research studies to practice.
D21. Evaluating practice with supervision.
On BEAP Alumni Survey items C35 the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
1
Poor
Adequate
Good
2
3
6
4
5
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
10
How well prepared were you in
C19. Evaluating research studies.
C20. Applying the findings of research studies to practice.
C21. Evaluating practice with supervision.
On BEAP Employer Survey items 14, 15, & 16, the mean score will
exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
1
Poor
Adequate
Good
2
3
6
4
5
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
10
How well does the employee demonstrate the following ability?
14. Applies research findings to practice.
15. Evaluates effectiveness of own practice interventions.
16. Evaluates effectiveness of programs.
On the Practicum Evaluation, Section 6, each practicum cohort will achieve a
mean score of 3
5 Excellent, 4 Very good, 3 Good, 2 Poor, 1 Unsatisfactory
6
6a.
6b.
6c.
2009
4.5
4.5
4.75
4.5
2010
3.9
4.2
4
4.1
2011
4.4
4.3
4.5
4.64
2012
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.2
The student
6.
engaged in research-informed practice and practice-inform
6a.
used professional resources (i.e. professional journals, texts, m
evidence-based practice.
6b.
evaluated the effectiveness of at least one aspect of practice wh
6c.
learned about the host agency’s research, and practice evaluati
ACAT- section on Research
The graduating class will achieve a score at or above the 50%ile.
Data was not available until 2009-10
Research Methods
2009-10
62
2010-11
66
2011-12
54
Major Assessment Report, AU SW Program
1-2013
Page 9 of 16
g. Students will apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment.
On BEAP Exit Survey items D16, the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
D16
2008
7.89
2009
8.27
2010
7.8
2011
7.83
2012
7.40
C16
2008
6.67
2009
x
2010
7.88
2011
6.50
2012
7.29
Superb
9
10
How well prepared have you been in
D16. Using bio-psycho-social theories in interventions with individuals.
On BEAP Alumni Survey items C16, the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
10
How well prepared were you in
C16. Using bio-psycho-social theories in interventions with individuals.
On BEAP Employer Survey items 7, 8, & 9, the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
7
8
9
2008
6.75
6.75
6.75
2009
x
x
2010
7.75
7.75
7.00
2011
9.0
10.0
8.0
2012
7.67
7.67
7.67
2009
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.6
2010
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.4
2011
4.2
4.0
4.2
4.3
2012
4.7
4.5
4.5
4.4
10
How well does the employee demonstrate the following ability?
7. Uses theoretical frameworks to understand individual development.
8. Uses theoretical frameworks to understand families.
9. Uses theoretical frameworks to understand groups.
On the Practicum Evaluation, Section 7, each practicum cohort will achieve a mean score of 3
5 Excellent, 4 Very good, 3 Good, 2 Poor, 1 Unsatisfactory
The student
7.
applied knowledge of human behavior and the social environment.
7a.
demonstrated knowledge of common intrapersonal factors that impact
biophysical, cognitive/perceptual, emotional, and behavioral functioning
and motivation of consumers commonly served by the agency.
7b.
demonstrated knowledge about the social issues and environmental factors
commonly encountered by the individuals, families, groups, organizations,
and communities served by the agency.
7c.
used an ecological systems model to guide assessment, goal setting,
intervention and evaluation while working in the host agency.
7
7a.
7b.
7c.
ACAT- section on HBSE
The graduating class will achieve a score at or above the 50%ile.
Data was not available until 2009-10.
Human Behavior in Social Environment
2009-10
50
2010-11
66
2011-12
67
Major Assessment Report, AU SW Program
1-2013
Page 10 of 16
h. Students will engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver
effective social work services.
On BEAP Exit Survey items D17, D18, & D25, the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
D17
D18
D25
2008
7.72
7.67
7.94
2009
8.09
8.09
8.00
2010
7.7
7.20
7.6
2011
7.83
7.5
7.67
2012
7.33
7.27
7.27
C17
C18
C25
2008
7.5
7.5
7.83
2009
x
x
x
2010
7.38
8.75
8.38
2011
7.25
7.00
7.75
2012
7.0
7.0
7.86
10
How well prepared have you been in
D17. Analyzing the impact of social policies on client systems.
D18. Using generalist knowledge to influence organizational policies
D 25. Seeking necessary organizational change with supervision
On BEAP Alumni Survey items C17, C18, & C25, the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
10
How well prepared were you in
C17. Analyzing the impact of social policies on client systems.
C18. Using generalist knowledge to influence organizational policies
C 25. Seeking necessary organizational change with supervision
On BEAP Employer Survey items 13, the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
13
2008
7.25
2009
x
2010
7.75
2011
8.0
2012
8.50
2011
4.6
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.8
2012
4.6
4.7
4.6
4.5
4.4
Superb
9
10
How well does the employee demonstrate the following ability?
13. Advocates appropriately for changes in agency policies, procedures, or practices.
On the Practicum Evaluation, Section 8, each practicum cohort will achieve a mean score of 3
5 Excellent, 4 Very good, 3 Good, 2 Poor, 1 Unsatisfactory
The student
8.
engaged in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and
to deliver effective social work services.
8a.
acquired knowledge about internal and external policies, programs, and
practices that impact the agency and utilizing that knowledge for effective
service delivery.
8b.
assessed unmet needs or social problems in the organization and/or community.
8c.
assessed the effectiveness of existing policies related to consumers served by
the host agency.
8d.
collaborated with others in the organization and/or community to propose,
advocate for, and/or implement policy intended to enhance the meeting of
consumer need.
8
8a.
8b.
8c.
8d.
2009
4.7
4.8
4.4
4.6
4.2
2010
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.5
4.3
ACAT- section on Policy and Services
The graduating class will achieve a score at or above the 50%ile.
Data was not available until 2009-10
Policy and Services
2009-10
45
2010-11
60
2011-12
52
Major Assessment Report, AU SW Program
1-2013
Page 11 of 16
i.
Students will engage, assess, intervene, and evaluate with individuals, families, groups,
organizations, and communities.
On BEAP Exit Survey items D15, & D18, the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
Very
Good
8
7
2008
8.39
7.67
2009
8.00
8.09
2010
7.90
7.20
2011
8.08
7.5
2008
7.5
2009
x
2010
8.75
2011
7.75
2012
8.0
6.17
x
7.88
7.00
7.0
5
6
2008
7.75
8.00
2009
x
x
2010
7.75
7.50
2011
10.0
9.0
2012
8.25
8.25
9
9a.
2009
4.8
4.8
2010
4.6
4.6
2011
4.2
4.3
2012
4.4
4.5
9b.
9c.
9d.
9e.
9f.
9g.
9h.
4.6
4.5
4.7
4.4
4.7
4.8
4.8
4.6
4.5
4.3
4.3
4.7
4.5
4.7
4.5
4.4
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.6
4.5
4.0
4.3
4.3
4.5
4.7
4.5
4.5
D15
D18
2012
7.27
7.27
Superb
9
10
How well prepared have you been in
D15. Applying generalist interventions in practice with client systems.
D18. Using generalist knowledge to influence organizational policies
On BEAP Alumni Survey items C15 & C18, the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
10
C1
5
C1
8
How well prepared were you in
C15. Applying generalist interventions in practice with client systems.
C18. Using generalist knowledge to influence organizational policies
On BEAP Employer Survey items 5 & 6, the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
10
How well does the employee demonstrate the following ability?
5. Applies knowledge of generalist practice.
6. Applies skills of generalist practice.
On the Practicum Evaluation, Section 9, each practicum cohort will achieve a mean score
of 3
5 Excellent, 4 Very good, 3 Good, 2 Poor, 1 Unsatisfactory
The student
9
engaged, assessed, intervened, and evaluated with individuals,
families, groups, organizations, and communities.
9a.
effectively facilitated collaborative working relationship with the
target population.
9b.
used data-collection skills to gather information about the relevant
strengths and unmet needs of the target population.
9c.
accurately assessed the issues to be addressed.
9d.
determined goals that appropriately consider the auspices of the
agency and the needs of the target population.
9e.
identified evidence based interventions that can be utilized to reach
the established goals.
9f.
collaborated with other agency personnel to deliver the identified
interventions and/or refer the consumer(s) to appropriate resources.
9g.
appropriately terminated services with the target population.
9h.
evaluated, under supervision, the effectiveness of the work with the
target population.
Major Assessment Report, AU SW Program
1-2013
Page 12 of 16
ACAT- section on Social Work Practice
The graduating class will achieve a score at or above the 50%ile.
Data was not available until 2009-10
2009-10
60
Social Work Practice
j.
2011-12
68
Students will use skills (written, verbal and non- verbal) to communicate effectively with diverse
client populations, Colleagues, and communities.
On BEAP Exit Survey item D22, the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
2010-11
68
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
D22
2008
8.17
2009
8.73
2010
8.0
2011
8.17
2012
8.0
C22
2008
7.83
2009
x
2010
8.50
2011
7.75
2012
8.14
Superb
9
10
How well prepared have you been in
D22. Using communication skills based on needs related to diversity and different abilities.
On BEAP Alumni Survey items C22, the mean score will exceed 6.0.
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
10
How well prepared were you in
C22. Using communication skills based on needs related to diversity and different abilities.
On BEAP Employer Survey item 17, the mean score will exceed 6.0.
17
Very
Poor
0
Poor
1
2
Adequate
3
4
Good
5
6
7
Very
Good
8
Superb
9
20
08
7.
25
200
9
x
201
0
8.2
5
201
1
10.
0
2012
8.25
10
How well does the employee demonstrate the following ability?
17. Uses communication skills appropriately with different groups/client systems.
Major Assessment Report, AU SW Program
1-2013
Page 13 of 16
10.
200
9
4.5
201
0
4.6
201
1
4.6
10a.
4.6
4.6
4.5
10b.
4.7
4.2
4.3
10c.
4.6
4.3
4.2
10d.
4.8
4.6
4.3
10e.
4.6
4.6
4.2
10f.
4.6
4.5
4.4
10g.
4.8
4.6
4.4
10h.
4.6
4.7
4.5
10i.
4.8
4.7
4.5
10j.
4.8
4.8
4.7
On the Practicum Evaluation, Section 10, each practicum cohort will achieve a mean score of 3
5 Excellent, 4 Very good, 3 Good, 2 Poor, 1 Unsatisfactory
The student
10.
used skills (written, verbal and non- verbal) to communicate effectively
with diverse client populations, colleagues, and communities.
10a.
used a clear, objective, organized format that follows agency standards for
all written documentation (i.e. assessments, treatment plans, progress notes,
letters, proposals, etc.)
10b.
differentially selected styles of communication appropriate for interactions
with diverse clients, colleagues, and communities.
10c.
accurately assessed the verbal and non-verbal communication of clients and
colleagues.
10d.
utilized “active listening” with clients and colleagues.
10e.
initiated conversations with clients and staff.
10f.
verbally expressed ideas which were clear and congruent with non-verbal
messages.
10g.
established warm, helping relationships.
10h.
expressed different points of view without depreciating others.
10i.
represented the agency well in interactions within the community network
of providers.
10j.
maintained confidentiality in written and verbal communication.
Each senior practicum cohort will receive an average of 3 or above on the evaluation items below.
These items are included in the evaluation form used to provide feedback about sessions presented
by the students at the Annual Anderson University Social Work Conference. All conference
participants are asked to complete the evaluation form.
Please indicate your thoughts on the following by using a scale of 1 to 4 with 4 being the best and 1
being the worst.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1
2
3
4
5
6
2008
3.72
3.73
3.26
3.44
3.67
3.7
2009
3.62
3.58
3.32
3.43
3.78
3.72
2010
3.43
3.63
3.6
3.28
3.65
3.75
2011
3.85
3.9
3.58
3.67
3.86
3.88
20
12
4.
5
4.
4
4.
6
4.
5
4.
5
4.
6
4.
5
4.
5
4.
7
4.
6
4.
8
2012
3.86
3.86
3.58
3.58
3.81
3.78
The presentation demonstrated knowledge in the subject area
The presenters were well prepared and organized
The presenters utilized a style that maintained my interest
The presenters conveyed information that I can apply to my professional practice.
The presenters effectively responded to questions and comments voiced in audience
participation.
The session accomplished its stated objective.
3. Upon completion of the Anderson University Social Work Program students will demonstrate
the ability to uphold the values and ethics of the social work profession in the context of their
personal faith.
a. Students will adhere to the National Association of Social Worker’s Social Work Code of Ethics
and provide value sensitive services to consumers.
See data collected for 2b.
Major Assessment Report, AU SW Program
1-2013
Page 14 of 16
b. Students will integrate the spiritual and religious aspects of life in a professionally responsible
manner.
On the Practicum Evaluation, Section 10, each practicum cohort will achieve a mean score
of 3
5 Excellent, 4 Very good, 3 Good, 2 Poor, 1 Unsatisfactory
The student
11.
integrated the spiritual and religious aspects of life in a professionally
responsible manner.
11a.
maintained a nonjudgmental stance regarding the spiritual beliefs and
practices of others.
11b.
demonstrated acceptance of the client’s inherent worth and value.
11c.
included, when pertinent, assessment of the client’s spiritual and religious
resources.
11d.
honored his/her own spiritual values while never imposing them on others.
11
11a
11b
11c
11d
2009
4.9
4.8
4.8
4.5
4.9
2010
4.1
4.7
4.7
4.5
4.7
2011
4.6
4.8
4.8
4.5
4.8
2012
4.6
4.7
4.7
4.5
4.7
4. Anderson University Social Work Program students and alumni will demonstrate a
commitment to provide servant leadership in their personal and professional lives.
a. Students will engage in servant leadership opportunities while at Anderson University.
On the Practicum Evaluation, Section 10, each practicum cohort will achieve a mean score of 3
5 Excellent, 4 Very good, 3 Good, 2 Poor, 1 Unsatisfactory
12.
12a.
12b.
12c.
2009
4.7
4.7
4.6
4.8
2010
4.0
4.7
4.7
4.9
2011
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
2012
4.7
4.7
4.5
4.4
The student
12
engaged in servant leadership opportunities while in this
practicum.
12a.
conscientiously sought opportunities to serve the host agency and
consumers throughout the practicum semester.
12b.
discerned what needed to be accomplished and willingly engaging in
related tasks.
12c.
cooperated with colleagues to achieve the goals of the agency and
consumers.
On the Practicum Application, 75% of a practicum cohort will list
2 or more Human Services Experiences beyond the three required
social work internships.
2 or more Human Service
Experiences beyond required 3
SW internships.
2008
13/16
2009
10/11
2010
10/10
2011
13/13
2012
11/12
81%
91%
100%
100%
92%
Human Service Experiences
List in chronological order volunteer, employment and internship
experiences you have had during your university years.
Major Assessment Report, AU SW Program
1-2013
Page 15 of 16
b. Anderson University Social Work Program alumni will be engaged in servant leadership
experiences.
On BEAP Alumni Survey item E1, 50% or more of the respondents will report community
involvement in one of the following activities:
6
7
8
2008
14.3
7.1
21.4
2009
x
x
x
2010
13.3
6.7
13.3
2011
20
0
20
2012
8.3
8.3
25.0
E1. Since you completed your undergraduate social work degree, in which of the following
professional activities have you participated? (Mark ALL that apply)
#6 Presented a talk to a community group.
#7 Conducted a workshop
#8 Involved in community service projects, agency boards, committees, task forces, etc.
In an on-line survey sent to Anderson University
Social Work Alumni from 2008 through 2012
whose e-mail addresses were in the AU Alumni
Office database., 70 % of respondents will be
engaged in servant leadership experiences.
The survey was e-mailed to 65 alumni. There were 23 responses, for a 35% return rate. Of
those responding 96% reported engagement in servant leadership activities.
Answer
Count
%
Served on an agency board, committee, or
task force
3
3.70%
Participated in a community project
9
11.11%
Volunteered time at my church
10
12.35%
Volunteered time in a community
organization (i.e. Scouting, Rotary, Food
Pantry)
11
13.58%
Volunteered in a school
4
4.94%
Participated in a mission or service trip
5
6.17%
Sent an advocacy letter
8
9.88%
Provided a presentation to a church or
community group
7
8.64%
Conducted a workshop
2
2.47%
Participated in grant writing
3
3.70%
Participated in fund-raising for church and/or
community organizations
4
4.94%
Served an at-risk population in addition to
the primary population you serve at work
(i.e. foster care, extended care, incarcerated,
victims of domestic violence)
12
14.81%
Volunteered with a political organization
and/or on a campaign
2
2.47%
None of the above
1
1.23%
81
100%
Total
Major Assessment Report, AU SW Program
1-2013
Page 16 of 16