Field Emission Cathode Gating for RF Electron Guns

Field Emission Cathode
Gating for RF Electron Guns
J.W. Lewellen and J. Noonan
Accelerator Systems Division
Advanced Photon Source
Argonne National Laboratory
Argonne National Laboratory
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
A U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Science Laboratory
Operated by The University of Chicago
Thanks and Acknowledgements
Sandra Biedron (ANL/ES)
Court Bohn (NIU)
Dave Dowell (SLAC)
Katherine Harkay (ANL/ASD)
Terry Maynard (ANL/IP)
Todd Smith (Stanford)
Various drive lasers of the
authors’ acquaintance, for
motivation
Pioneering
Science and
Technology
Office of Science
U.S. Department
of Energy
Outline
• Cathode Options
• Field Emission Cathode Gating Scheme
• Conclusions & Wrap-Up
Pioneering
Science and
Technology
Office of Science
U.S. Department
of Energy
Cathode Overview
“Ideal” Cathode Checklist:
9 Long lifetime
9 Rapidly switchable on/off
9 Damage resistant
9 High charge density
9 Cryogenic compatible
9 Simple operation
Photocathodes
Emission mechanism: Use laser pulse to
excite electrons off the cathode surface
Advantages:
9 Rapidly
switchable
9 High charge
density
Disadvantages:
8 Efficiency-lifetime
tradeoffs
8 External drive
laser required
Thermionic cathodes
Field-emission cathodes
Emission mechanism: heat the cathode to
“boil” the electron sea in the metal
Emission mechanism: Electric field pulls
electrons from cathode surface
Advantages:
9 Long lifetime
9 Robust
9 Simple to
operate
Pioneering
Science and
Technology
Disadvantages:
8 Not rapidly
switchable
8 High temperature
required
Advantages:
9 Very simple
9 High charge
density
9 Rapid turnon/off
Disadvantages:
8 Problematic gating
(for rf app.)
8 Damage questions
Office of Science
U.S. Department
of Energy
Beam Emission Timing
Normalized electric field
ZeroCrossing
1
1
3
0
4
1
Pioneering
Science and
Technology
2
50
0
50
100
150
200
Field phase [deg]
250
300
350
400
Office of Science
U.S. Department
of Energy
Field Emission Cathode Gating Scheme
FE cathodes emit electrons when the field is high enough
• operate at low temperature (unlike thermionic cathodes)
• emit only under “internal” influences (unlike photocathodes)
Pioneering
Science and
Technology
Office of Science
U.S. Department
of Energy
Will it work?
Simulation:
- Incorporated the Shottky
emission model directly
- Also includes space-charge
effects
4
3
Current density [arb. units]
•
3
j = α⋅
(β E m )
⋅e
Φ
2
−
BΦ 2
(β E m ) 2
2
1
0
0
Pioneering
Science and
Technology
50
100
Phase [deg]
150
200
Office of Science
U.S. Department
of Energy
FE Cathode Gating: Other Comments
Electromagnetic field data from file AUTOCATH.SF
9
9
8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
Electromagnetic field data from file AUTOCATH.SF
0
Problem title line 1: Design of a cathode cell for a dual-frequency, srf, electon microscope gun
autoca01.tbl
10
-2
5-17-2004 14:31:48
14
Z:\gun\design\MICROS~1\beamsim\parmela\CathPos\AUTOCATH.SF
autoca03.tbl 5-17-2004
5-17-200414:08:22
14:30:02
1.5
2.5
0
Problem
srf, 10
electon microscope
gun
0 title line 1:
2 Design of a4 cathode cell 6for a dual-frequency,
8
12
1
2
1.5
Ez
1
.5
0
-.5
.5
Ez
•
10
Ez (MV/m)
•
Proper field addition in both space
and time Æ special gun geometry
Scales well to ~ 50 mA beam
current without special focusing
Superconducting version highly
desirable for efficient use of rf
power, true CW operation potential
Ez (MV/m)
•
-1
0
0
2
4
6
8
Z (cm)
Pioneering
Science and
Technology
10
12
14
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Z (cm)
Office of Science
U.S. Department
of Energy
14
Scaled Performance
Beam current
(mA)
Pioneering
Science and
Technology
Office of Science
U.S. Department
of Energy
Comments
•
Basic idea
- Strong 3rd harmonic at the cathode to launch the beam
- Fundamental dominates in body of gun for more conventional
dynamics
- Details of emitter tbd; there are possibilties
•
Initial studies aimed at electron microscopy
- Low beam currents
- Low space charge
•
Extensions to higher currents?
- Theoretically possible
- Cathode-region focusing needed
Pioneering
Science and
Technology
Office of Science
U.S. Department
of Energy
Conclusions & Wrap-Up
•
Field-emitter cathodes are now a possible choice for rf gun use
- first- and third-harmonic field combination to gate emission
- proper selection of recess depth and other factors to ensure
good beam propagation through the gun
•
Moderate (1 – 50 mA) average beam currents appear possible
•
Beam energies of 1.5 – 2 MeV appear possible
•
This gun design, in combination with standard phase-space
manipulations to reduce the energy spread etc., can drive a
number of relatively high-volume applications
Pioneering
Science and
Technology
Office of Science
U.S. Department
of Energy