Mechanism and Physiological Significance of Growth Factor

REVIEWS
PHYSIOLOGY 28: 423– 431, 2013; doi:10.1152/physiol.00023.2013
Mechanism and Physiological
Significance of Growth Factor-Related
Autophagy
Terytty Yang Li, Shu-Yong Lin,
and Sheng-Cai Lin
State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Life
Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
[email protected]
Growth factors, typically defined as natural substances capable of stimulating
cell growth and differentiation, are vital regulators for the survival of metazoan
cells. In this review, we will focus on growth factor signaling pathways that are
closely related to autophagy induction and discuss the critical roles of this
fascinating cellular process in intracellular energy homeostasis, cell fate determination, and pathophysiological regulation.
1548-9213/13 ©2013 Int. Union Physiol. Sci./Am. Physiol. Soc.
Downloaded from http://physiologyonline.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on June 16, 2017
One of the most intriguing phenomena about metazoan cells, as opposed to unicellular eukaryotes, is
that their survival depends on not only sufficient
surrounding nutrients but also growth factors (71).
When binding to their cognate receptors on the cell
surface, growth factors facilitate cellular anabolic
metabolism by stimulating the uptake and usage of
nutrients such as glucose (119, 123), amino acids
(96), and glutamine (124) through the translocalization or upregulation of nutrient transporters onto the
cell surface. Growth factors exert their growthstimulating roles by activating various signaling
pathways, among which the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT pathway appears to play a dominant role. Together, these effects maintain cell
energy supply and biosynthesis of various intermediates like nucleotides, amino acids, and fatty acids,
which prepare cells for the needs of rapid proliferation, including embryonic development (68), wound
healing (3, 126), and cancer progression (128). Not
surprisingly, some cells become cancerous after acquiring mutations or altered expression of growth
factor signaling-related molecules to engender a
state that mimics constant growth factor input and
thus sustains dysregulated nutrient uptake and
metabolism (63, 118).
Upon growth factor deprivation, cells begin to
use intracellular resources to meet the basic requirements of energy and metabolites, a process
known as catabolic metabolism, in that autophagy
is a critical one (56, 93, 109). Autophagy is typically
classified into three types, microautophagy, chaperone-mediated autophagy, and macroautophagy.
Microautophagy is the direct engulfment of cytosol
components by lysosome membrane (84), and
chaperone-mediated autophagy occurs when proteins are specifically recognized by chaperone heat
shock cognate 70 (hsc70) and subsequently transferred to lysosome and degraded (46). Most of our
current knowledge about growth factor-related
autophagy, however, comes from the study of
macroautophagy (56, 93, 134, 135). Defined as a
self-degradation process in that cytosolic components, including unnecessary organelles, are
engulfed inside the double-membraned vesicle
named autophagosome and subsequently degraded after the autophagosome fuses with the
lysosome, macroautophagy (hereafter referred to
as autophagy) benefits cell survival under multitudes of stress conditions, such as glucose starvation (47), amino acids depletion (88), treatment of
cytotoxic stressors (95), infection of pathogens
(60), hypoxia (36), and growth factor deprivation
(69). In the past few decades, extensive studies in
yeast and multicellular organisms alike have revealed a great number of genes related to autophagy (86, 134, 135). The multiple roles of
autophagy in cell growth (122), embryonic development (1, 101, 114, 142), postnatal survival (57),
glucose and lipid homeostasis (2, 31, 106, 141), and
cancer progression (13, 14, 127) were also demonstrated. Although the core autophagy-related genes
(the ATG genes) are highly conserved from yeast to
mammals (132), growth factor deprivation-induced autophagy seems to be specific for metazoans since unicellular organisms lack the growth
factor-dependent nutrients uptake system (71),
which hints at the possibility that mammalian cells
probably own a more sophisticated autophagy machinery network (4, 134, 135). Indeed, different
stimuli are capable of using different pathways to
elicit autophagy in mammals (12, 56, 90).
Early work by several independent groups of
researchers on the negative regulatory functions
of growth factors in autophagy opened up new
avenues to studying the growth factor-related
autophagy. For example, Kondo and colleagues
found that inhibition of platelet-derived growth
factor signaling was able to induce autophagy in
malignant glioma cells (110). Using C. elegans as a
model system, it was depicted that autophagy is
suppressed upon insulin-like growth factor activation (83). In another study, removal of single IL-3
from the culture medium was shown to be capable
423
REVIEWS
of inducing autophagy in apoptosis-lacking cells
(69). It is also noteworthy that some growth factors
such as TGF-␤ and TGF-␣ could reversely stimulate
autophagy under certain conditions (42, 49). However, these positive regulatory roles of the TGF factors
in autophagy induction are often associated with
their growth-inhibitory side rather than the growthstimulating effects referred to herein. Therefore, it is
probably safe to conclude that growth (stimulating)
factors are intrinsic autophagy suppressors (71).
Growth Factor-Regulated
Autophagy as a Gatekeeper for
Maintaining Cellular Homeostasis
FIGURE 1. Possible responses of mammalian cells to growth factor restriction
424
PHYSIOLOGY • Volume 28 • November 2013 • www.physiologyonline.org
Downloaded from http://physiologyonline.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on June 16, 2017
In multicellular organisms, cellular metabolism is
under delicate regulatory control instructed by
growth factor signaling. Unlike unicellular organisms, metazoan cells compete for limiting growth
factors (94). Without stimulation of growth factors,
cells are reprogramed to downregulate the major
anabolic processes and adopt a catabolic metabolism designed to maximize the efficiency of ATP
production from limited nutrient uptake (18, 69,
71, 102, 118). Growing lines of evidence demonstrate that such loss of nutrient usage can directly
affect some crucial intracellular processes; for example, decrease in the levels of intermediate metabolites such as acetyl-CoA, a substrate for global
histone acetylation, leads to downregulated expression of anabolic enzymes (70, 123, 144).
Under the situation of growth factor restriction,
autophagy plays a major role in providing cells
with amino acids and lipids for the catabolic processes initiated to support the demand of ATP and
thus sustain cellular homeostasis. By digesting
their own macromolecules such as proteins and
organelles, cells cannot only obtain copious substrates for both biosynthesis and energy generation
but also eliminate damaged organelles or misfolded proteins and, therefore, to some extent prevent the generation of excess ROS and genome
instability (56, 85, 93). The importance of autophagy in facilitating cell survival is also underscored by the observation that deletion of certain
autophagy-related genes leads to a much rapid
death of cells under growth factor-deprivation conditions (69). Altogether, upon growth factor restriction, cells are forced to shut down almost all of the
proliferation-related pathways and stop most of
the anabolic processes, which is followed by the
cell cycle arrest and catabolic processes such as
oxidation of macromolecules and autophagy (118,
121, 122), although prolonged withdrawal of
growth factors will indeed lead to cell death (15)
(FIGURE 1).
Conversely, after replenishment of growth factors, cells shift the main challenge from survival
back to growth and proliferation, and initiate anabolic metabolism (125). The instructive growth
factor signaling therefore redirects cells to increase
the uptake of glucose, glutamine, and the other
REVIEWS
nutrients to directly support the anabolic requirement for cell proliferation and suppress autophagy
in the meantime (69).
Relationship Between Autophagy
and Apoptosis on Growth Factor
Restriction
The Signaling Network of Growth
Factor Restriction-Induced
Autophagy
Researchers have revealed elaborate signaling networks that regulate growth factor-related autophagy (FIGURE 2). The protein kinase AKT is a
central node linking growth factors to induction of
autophagy. Several pathways act upstream of AKT
to mediate growth factor signaling through distinct
routes (6). Lack of growth factor signaling often
leads to reduced AKT activity, which by default
renders AKT target substrates de-inhibited (32, 75).
Over 100 nonredundant AKT substrates, including
TSC2 (26, 27, 111), the forkhead box (FOX) O transcription factors 1/3/4 (91, 113), GSK3␣/␤ (16), and
Beclin 1, have been reported to execute diverse
biological functions (75). Importantly, these factors
are the major mediators for AKT to regulate growth
factor-related autophagy.
Upstream Signaling to AKT
Cells sense the abundance of extracellular growth
factors through a series of ligand-specific receptor
Downloaded from http://physiologyonline.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on June 16, 2017
Over the recent years, with the help of genetic tools
to disable the autophagic machinery, it is becoming more evident that, rather than a mechanism to
execute cell death, autophagy represents an antiapoptosis process and promotes cell survival under
various stimuli (54, 55, 138, 104). Especially, with
the loss of growth factor signals, the uptake of
nutrients are limited (96, 119, 123, 124) and autophagy is subsequently strongly activated (64, 69,
145). By breaking down cellular components and
recycling metabolic substrates, autophagy at such
conditions becomes the major force to maintain
regular energy homeostasis inside the cell (71, 93).
However, as more and more cellular contents are
recycled through autophagy, there is an expected
time point that cellular components are depleted.
Apoptosis or other cell death procedures, therefore,
gradually become the major theme as the restriction
of growth factor continues (73) (FIGURE 1). It is also
noteworthy that autophagy and apoptosis probably
often occur at the same time as they compete to
determine cell fate, the concept of which is further
strengthened by the fact that some molecules are
even shared by these two different processes (73, 89).
tyrosine kinases (RTKs) (62). There are ⬃20 subfamilies of RTKs in humans, all of which share a
common structure consisting of an extracellular
ligand-binding region, a single-pass transmembrane domain, and an intracellular tyrosine kinase
domain. In most cases, binding of a growth factor
to the ligand-binding domain of its cognate receptor results in the activation of this receptor kinase
and initiation of intracellular signaling cascades,
which manifests various cellular effects (62). Insulin and insulin-like growth factor I (IGFI), for example, activate their cognate receptors that, in
turn, phosphorylate adaptor proteins such as insulin receptor substrate (IRS) and Src homologous
and collagen (SHC) proteins, and the activated IRS
or SHC consequently leads to activation of the
PI3K-AKT pathway and MAPK cascade (6, 8). Similarly, other growth factors such as platelet-derived
growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor
(EGF), and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)
activate their respective receptors through phosphorylation of their cytoplasmic tails, which recruit specific effector molecules such as SHP-2,
Gab1, and Grb2 and further activate the PI3K-AKT
signaling (8, 130, 136).
Downstream Signaling of AKT
mTOR
mTOR is an evolutionarily conserved serine/threonine protein kinase that controls cell metabolism
and growth (20, 41, 59). Regulated by a variety of
upstream signals, mTOR is strongly repressed by
tuberous sclerosis 2 (TSC2; also known as tuberin)
and proline-rich AKT substrate 40 kDa (PRAS40)
(27, 37, 99, 111, 117). Upon growth factor restriction, AKT, along with other growth factor responding kinases such as MAPK and p90RSK1, no longer
phosphorylates and inactivates TSC2 (26, 27, 76,
92) and PRAS40 (53), which hence leads to the
inhibition of mTOR. Such suppressed mTOR then
activates autophagy due to its impaired ability to
phosphorylate and inhibit the ULK1/ATG13/FIP200
(unc-51-like kinase 1/mammalian autophagy-related
gene 13/focal adhesion kinase family-interacting
protein of 200 kDa) complex that belongs to the
autophagy initiation core machinery (25, 35, 45). In
addition, mTOR is also implicated to suppress autophagy during the step of lysosome activation (146).
GSK3
GSK3 is one of the most classic AKT substrates (16).
The activity of GSK3 is inversely regulated by phosphorylation by AKT; in other words, in the absence
of AKT activity, GSK3 becomes active after deinhibition. In addition to common growth factors, developmental morphogens that promote cell
PHYSIOLOGY • Volume 28 • November 2013 • www.physiologyonline.org
425
REVIEWS
autophagy initiation (64). Genetic hints for the
emerging roles of TIP60 (Esa1 in yeast) as an essential
autophagy regulator was also obtained in yeast and
fruit flies (58, 137). In support of a positive role of
GSK3 in autophagy, it was demonstrated that interleukin 17A inhibits autophagy through inactivating
GSK3␤ (66), and activation of GSK3 by ROS was
shown to promote autophagy (67).
FOXO
Apart from regulation of signaling molecules, growth
factor-stimulated AKT can directly phosphorylate the
forkhead box (FOX) O transcription factors, which
are consequently excluded from the nucleus and inactivated (7, 50). In the absence of growth factors,
decreased PI3K-AKT signaling leads to increased
transcriptional activity of FOXO3, inducing the expression of several core autophagy genes, such as
LC3B and Gabarapl1 (19, 74, 103, 143). Interestingly,
it was shown that the AKT-FOXO3 axis is involved in
autophagy induction in skeletal muscle (74), and instead inhibition of mTOR by rapamycin is not able to
initiate this process. These findings suggest that selective usages of the distinct signaling cascades may
exist in different cells or tissues. In addition to direct
transactivation of the autophagy core molecules,
FOXO could upregulate glutamine synthetase for glutamine production, which results in mTOR inhibition and ultimately autophagy induction (116). Of
note, a transactivation-independent mechanism for
FOXO has been suggested by a report showing that,
under serum starvation conditions, cytosolic FOXO1
became heavily acetylated after dissociating from
histone deacetylase SIRT2 and in turn bound to
ATG7 to promote autophagy (145), although it was
disputed that, upon activation, FOXO1 is mostly
translocated into the nucleus (82).
Beclin 1
Moreover, the core autophagy machinery has also
been shown to be directly targeted by AKT. Wang
et al. (120) demonstrated that AKT directly phosphorylates Beclin 1, a Bcl-2 interacting coiled-coil
protein, and the mammalian othologue of yeast
Atg6, leading to dissociation of the autophagy-activating Beclin 1-VPS34 complex and inhibition of
autophagy.
AMPK
FIGURE 2. Signaling network of growth factor restriction-induced
autophagy
The protein kinase AKT is a central node linking growth factor signaling to downstream pathways that related to autophagy induction. In the presence of growth factors, AKT phosphorylates a wide array of substrates, including TSC2, PRAS40, GSK3,
FOXO, and Beclin 1, leading to their inactivation. Conversely, growth factor restriction
could result in de-inhibition of these substrates and subsequent initiation of autophagy
through different pathways.
426
PHYSIOLOGY • Volume 28 • November 2013 • www.physiologyonline.org
AMPK is the major sensor of cellular energy status
and is implicated as critical in glucose starvationinduced autophagy (21, 30, 47). In response to acute
energy depletion caused by hypoxia, exercise, or
glucose deprivation, AMPK is activated by phosphorylation at Thr172, which is mainly catalyzed by the
liver kinase B1 (LKB1) (30). Not surprisingly, upon
glucose deprivation, AMPK activates ULK1 through
Downloaded from http://physiologyonline.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on June 16, 2017
growth, such as Wnt and hedgehog ligands, also
participate in the regulation of autophagy by modulating GSK3 activity (43, 105, 131). This feature
makes GSK3 an inherent sensor for the abundance
of a large variety of growth factors. GSK3 can phosphorylate TSC2, leading to mTOR inactivation (38).
Direct inhibition of GSK3 by specific chemical inhibitors attenuates autophagy, which was proposed to be due to mTOR being activated (100).
Another pivotal direct target of GSK3 for the regulation of growth factor-related autophagy is the
acetyltransferase TIP60, also known as K (lysine)acetyltransferase 5 or KAT5. Upon growth factor deprivation, de-inhibited GSK3 phosphorylates and
increases the enzymatic activity of TIP60, which in
turn acetylates and activates ULK1, leading to
REVIEWS
Pathophysiological Functions of
Growth Factor-Related Autophagy
Autophagy is now widely implicated in pathophysiological processes such as cancer, neurodegenerative
disorders, aging, and cardiovascular and pulmonary
diseases (14). Below, we will focus on the possible
roles of growth factor-related autophagy as a pathophysiogical mediator and potential target for therapeutic intervention (FIGURE 3).
Increasing evidence supports the claim that autophagy is a double-edged sword in tumorigenesis
(14, 48, 65, 127). On one hand, autophagy has been
depicted to be capable of guarding against tumorigenesis by processes such as limiting inflammation, eliminating toxic unfolded proteins, and
removing damaged mitochondria that may produce cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (28, 79, 80,
127). Loss of autophagy by genetically targeting
core autophagy machinery is also reported to result in tumor development (77, 108, 140). Recently,
direct evidence linking the loss of growth factorrelated autophagy to cancer development has been
shown (51, 120). Furthermore, since cancer cells
often gain mutations of the critical regulators in
growth factor-sensing machineries, such as PIK3CA,
AKT, PTEN, TSC2, and Ras, they display constitutive
cell proliferation independent of growth factors. Importantly, the mutations may dampen autophagy
activity. It remains to be seen whether lack of autophagy in the settings of oncogenic mutations
would facilitate cancer development or progression
(5, 17, 33, 44, 107, 139, 147).
On the other hand, autophagy may also endow the cancer cells with the ability to survive in
nutrient-poor conditions through multiple processes (9, 10, 23, 29). Suppression of autophagy
hence conversely renders cancer cell more apt to
death. For instance, Yang et al. reported that inhibition of autophagy leads to a robust tumor regression and prolonged survival in pancreatic cancer
xenografts and genetic mouse models (133). Moreover, in Tsc2-null cells, which exhibit high mTOR
activity and likely own low autophagy activity, are
hypersentitive to energy deprivation-induced
apoptosis (39). Such phenomena have been especially instructive for cancer therapy since tumor
cells exposed to traditional radio- or chemotherapy
Downloaded from http://physiologyonline.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on June 16, 2017
phosphorylation and induces autophagy (21, 47), but
what about the growth factor restriction conditions?
AKT signaling, in the stimulation of insulin, negatively regulates the Thr172 phosphorylation of cardiac AMPK (34, 52). In addition, under Wnt
stimulation, AMPK phosphorylates TSC2, suppressor
of mTOR (38). However, as our previous work demonstrated, even prolonged growth factor deprivation,
different from glucose starvation, did not seem to
activate AMPK-ULK1 pathway in MEFs (64). The effects of growth factors on AMPK activation and its
ability in autophagy induction upon growth factor
deprivation therefore probably require more indepth investigation under different tissues and
stimulation situations.
FIGURE 3. Advantages and disadvantages of growth factor-related autophagy in physiology
PHYSIOLOGY • Volume 28 • November 2013 • www.physiologyonline.org
427
REVIEWS
428
PHYSIOLOGY • Volume 28 • November 2013 • www.physiologyonline.org
Conclusions and Perspectives
The past few decades have witnessed tremendous
advances in our knowledge of autophagy, both in
its molecular mechanisms and its pathophysiological functions. Activated by various stimuli, autophagy has been considered as one of the most
important links between availability of extracellular nutrients and intracellular metabolism. In
mammalian cells, such a link is heavily dependent
on the availability of growth factors. Despite the
delineation of the AKT-mTOR-ULK1, AKT-GSK3ULK1, and AKT-FOXO signaling routes, much has
to be learned about the molecular mechanisms
and functions of autophagy induced by limited
growth factors. One of the major challenges is to
determine how these different signaling modes are
preferentially utilized in response to limitation of
growth factors or extracellular nutrients, although
AKT activity may play a general upstream role in
controlling the activity of GSK3, mTOR, and FOXO.
For instance, Goldberg and colleagues demonstrated that AKT-FOXO route rather than AKTmTOR route is adopted in muscle autophagy (143).
In our study, the GSK3-TIP60-ULK1 route seems to
have no contribution to the glucose deprivationinduced autophagy (64).
Equally puzzling is how the distinct pathways
cross talk to each other. Preliminary work has implicated interrelationships between components of
these distinct pathways. Inoki et al. demonstrated
that GSK3 and AMPK cooperatively phosphorylate
TSC2 and inhibit mTOR (38). Activation of FOXO
could also inhibit mTOR by elevating glutamine
production (116). In addition, upon stimulation by
DNA damage, GSK3-TIP60 axis acetylates and activates p53 (11), which shares a wide array of
transcription targets with FOXO. Whether p53 activation by GSK3-TIP60 is also utilized in growth
factor-related autophagy remains to be tested.
What other mechanisms may be associated with
the individual components that participate in these
pathways is another interesting question. TIP60, for
example, is the key component in a transcription
co-regulator complex, acting for a range of transcription factors. Does it have any role resembling
the one FOXO played in changing the transcriptional programs in cells induced to undergo autophagy? Furthermore, although cells do undergo
death after prolonged growth factor deprivation
(15), little is known about how the stressed cells
exactly die. The molecular switch controlling the
fate of the cells to live or to die deserves to be
established. There is no doubt that understanding
of these open questions will be enormously beneficial in providing effective therapeutic approaches for detection, treatment, and control of
Downloaded from http://physiologyonline.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on June 16, 2017
often activate autophagy to promote survival and
become resistant to these treatments. Blockage of
autophagy is therefore considered as a promising
complementary way to promote cancer cell death
and to improve patient survival during clinical
cancer therapy (112).
Many studies have implicated autophagy in the
aging process. Genetic inhibition of autophagy induces aging-like degenerative changes in mammalian tissues, and that pathological aging, and
normal aging alike, is often associated with a reduced autophagic potential (78, 97). The longevitypromoting effect of autophagy could probably be
reached through several ways. First of all, the accumulation of misfolded or aggregated proteins,
like beta-amyloid and damaged organelles, which
strongly facilitate the aging process, can be effectively prevented through autophagy (19, 26, 40,
129). Second, autophagy could also reduce inflammatory cytokine secretion and spontaneous tumor
incidence (72, 98). Furthermore, consistent with a
correlation between autophagy and aging, aging is
demonstrated to be negatively associated with serum concentrations of several growth factors and
anabolic hormones. For example, the circulating
levels of GH, IGF-I, sex hormones, and DHEAs
progressively decline between 20 and 80 years of
age in humans (61). Finally, artificially stimulating
growth factor-related autophagy pathways has recently been shown to promote longevity in different model systems. For example, the FOXO family,
which is a direct executor in growth factor signaling and a classic autophagy stimulator, has been
widely recognized as an aging promoter in both
yeast and other organisms (22, 115). In another
study using cardiomyocytes as a model system,
specific expression of dominant-negative PI3K,
which also activates autophagy, leads to reduced
lipofuscin levels in the heart and increased longevity (24, 40). Thus manipulation of growth factorrelated autophagy could be a potential way to
delay aging.
Suppression of autophagy has also been shown
to be a potential therapy for some diseases that are
caused, at least in part, as a result of dysregulated
autophagy. Recognized as one of the leading causes
of infant mortality, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is
a common but devastating gastrointestinal disease
primarily seen in premature infants (87). The pathogenesis of this disorder is not fully understood, yet it
probably involves over-induction of autophagy. Maynard et al. demonstrated that admission of epidermal
growth factor (EGF) could strongly block the autophagy activity in the intestinal epithelium from
patients with NEC and reduce the death rate of epithelial cells, leading to protection of the intestinal
epithelium against mucosal injury (81).
REVIEWS
diseases caused by altered growth factor-related
autophagy. 䡲
Our work is supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31130016 and no.
31221065), the “111” Project of Ministry of Education of
China (no. B06016), and the Fundamental Research Funds
for the Xiamen Universities (grant no. 201112G021). S.-C.
Lin is a Cheung Kong Scholar.
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).
Author contributions: T.Y.L. and S.-Y.L. prepared figures;
T.Y.L. and S.-Y.L. drafted manuscript; T.Y.L., S.-Y.L., and S.C.L. edited and revised manuscript; T.Y.L., S.-Y.L., and S.-C.L.
approved final version of manuscript.
1.
2.
3.
Al Rawi S, Louvet-Vallée S, Djeddi A, Sachse M, Culetto E,
Hajjar C, Boyd L, Legouis R, Galy V. Postfertilization autophagy of sperm organelles prevents paternal mitochondrial DNA transmission. Science 334: 1144 –1147, 2011.
Baerga R, Zhang Y, Chen PH, Goldman S, Jin S. Targeted
deletion of autophagy-related 5 (atg5) impairs adipogenesis
in a cellular model and in mice. Autophagy 5: 1118 –1130,
2009.
Barrientos S, Stojadinovic O, Golinko MS, Brem H, TomicCanic M. Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing.
Wound Repair Regen 16: 585– 601, 2008.
4.
Behrends C, Sowa ME, Gygi SP, Harper JW. Network organization of the human autophagy system. Nature 466: 68 –76,
2010.
5.
Berger AH, Knudson AG, Pandolfi PP. A continuum model for
tumour suppression. Nature 476: 163–169, 2011.
6.
Brazil DP, Hemmings BA. Ten years of protein kinase B signalling: a hard Akt to follow. Trends Biochem Sci 26: 657–
664, 2001.
7.
Brunet A, Bonni A, Zigmond MJ, Lin MZ, Juo P, Hu LS,
Anderson MJ, Arden KC, Blenis J, Greenberg ME. Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating and inhibiting a Forkhead transcription factor. Cell 96: 857– 868, 1999.
8.
Burgering BM, Coffer PJ. Protein kinase B (c-Akt) in phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase signal transduction. Nature 376:
599 – 602, 1995.
9.
Buzzai M, Bauer DE, Jones RG, Deberardinis RJ, Hatzivassiliou G, ElstromRL, Thompson CB. The glucose dependence of
Akt-transformed cells can be reversed by pharmacologic activation of fatty acid beta-oxidation. Oncogene 24: 4165–
4173, 2005.
10. Carnero A. The PKB/AKT pathway in cancer. Curr Pharm Des
16: 34 – 44, 2010.
11. Charvet C, Wissler M, Brauns-Schubert P, Wang SJ, Tang Y,
Sigloch FC, Mellert H, Brandenburg M, Lindner SE, Breit B,
Green DR, McMahon SB, Borner C, Gu W, Maurer U. Phosphorylation of Tip60 by GSK-3 determines the induction of
PUMA and apoptosis by p53. Mol Cell 42: 584 –596, 2011.
19. Demontis F, Perrimon N. FOXO/4E-BP signaling in Drosophila muscles regulates organism-wide proteostasis during aging. Cell 143: 813– 825, 2010.
20. Dowling RJ, Topisirovic I, Alain T, Bidinosti M, Fonseca BD,
Petroulakis E, Wang X, Larsson O, Selvaraj A, Liu Y, Kozma
SC, Thomas G, Sonenberg N. mTORC1-mediated cell proliferation, but not cell growth, controlled by the 4E-BPs. Science 328: 1172–1176, 2010.
21. Egan DF, Shackelford DB, Mihaylova MM, Gelino S, Kohnz
RA, Mair W, Vasquez DS, Joshi A, Gwinn DM, Taylor R, Asara
JM, Fitzpatrick J, Dillin A, Viollet B, Kundu M, Hansen M,
Shaw RJ. Phosphorylation of ULK1 (hATG1) by AMP-activated protein kinase connects energy sensing to mitophagy.
Science 331: 456 – 461, 2011.
22. Eijkelenboom A, Burgering BM. FOXOs: signalling integrators for homeostasis maintenance. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14:
83–97, 2013.
23. Elstrom RL, Bauer DE, Buzzai M, Karnauskas R, Harris MH,
Plas DR, Zhuang H, Cinalli RM, Alavi A, Rudin CM, Thompson
CB. Akt stimulates aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells. Cancer
Res 64: 3892–3899, 2004.
24. Fontana L, Vinciguerra M, Longo VD. Growth factors, nutrient signaling, and cardiovascular aging. Circ Res 110: 1139 –
1150, 2012.
25. Ganley IG, Lam H, Wang J, Ding X, Chen S, Jiang XULK1.
ATG13. FIP200 complex mediates mTOR signaling and is
essential for autophagy. J Biol Chem 284: 12297–12305,
2009.
26. Gao X, Pan D. TSC1 and TSC2 tumor suppressors antagonize
insulin signaling in cell growth. Genes Dev 15: 1383–1392,
2001.
27. Goncharova EA, Goncharov DA, Eszterhas A, Hunter DS,
Glassberg MK, Yeung RS, Walker CL, Noonan D, Kwiatkowski DJ, Chou MM, Panettieri RA Jr, Krymskaya VP. Tuberin regulates p70 S6 kinase activation and ribosomal
protein S6 phosphorylation. A role for the TSC2 tumor suppressor gene in pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis
(LAM). J Biol Chem 277: 30958 –30967, 2002.
28. Gozuacik D, Kimchi A. Autophagy as a cell death and tumor
suppressor mechanism. Oncogene 23: 2891–2906, 2004.
29. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next
generation. Cell 144: 646 – 674, 2011.
30. Hardie DG, Ross FA, Hawley SA. AMPK: a nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol
Cell Biol 13: 251–262, 2012.
31. He C, Bassik MC, Moresi V, Sun K, Wei Y, Zou Z, An Z, Loh J,
Fisher J, Sun Q, Korsmeyer S, Packer M, May HI, Hill JA,
Virgin HW, Gilpin C, Xiao G, Bassel-Duby R, Scherer PE,
Levine B. Exercise-induced BCL2-regulated autophagy is required for muscle glucose homeostasis. Nature 481: 511–
515, 2012.
32. Hemmings BA, Restuccia DF. PI3K-PKB/Akt pathway. Cold
Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4: a011189, 2012.
12. Cheong H, Lindsten T, Wu J, Lu C, Thompson CB. Ammoniainduced autophagy is independent of ULK1/ULK2 kinases.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 11121–11126, 2011.
33. Hennessy BT, Smith DL, Ram PT, Lu Y, Mills GB. Exploiting
the PI3K/AKT pathway for cancer drug discovery. Nat Rev
Drug Discov 4: 988 –1004, 2005.
13. Cheong H, Lu C, Lindsten T, Thompson CB. Therapeutic
targets in cancer cell metabolism and autophagy. Nat Biotechnol 30: 671– 678, 2012.
34. Horman S, Vertommen D, Heath R, Neumann D, Mouton V,
Woods A, Schlattner U, Wallimann T, Carling D, Hue L, Rider
MH. Insulin antagonizes ischemia-induced Thr172 phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase alpha-subunits in
heart via hierarchical phosphorylation of Ser485/491. J Biol
Chem 281: 5335–5340, 2006.
14. Choi AM, Ryter SW, Levine B. Autophagy in human health
and disease. N Engl J Med 368: 651– 662, 2013.
15. Collins MKL, Perkins GR, Rodriguez-Tarduchy G, Nieto MA,
López-Rivas A. Growth factors as survival factors: regulation
of apoptosis. Bioessays 16: 133–138, 1993.
16. Cross DA, Alessi DR, Cohen P, Andjelkovich M, Hemmings
BA. Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 by insulin mediated by protein kinase B. Nature 378: 785–789, 1995.
17. Cully M, You H, Levine AJ, Mak TW. Beyond PTEN mutations:
the PI3K pathway as an integrator of multiple inputs during
tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 6: 184 –192, 2006.
Downloaded from http://physiologyonline.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on June 16, 2017
References
18. Deberardinis RJ, Lum JJ, Thompson CB. Phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase-dependent modulation of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A expression regulates lipid metabolism during hematopoietic cell growth. J Biol Chem 281: 37372–37380,
2006.
35. Hosokawa N, Hara T, Kaizuka T, Kishi C, Takamura A, Miura
Y, Iemura S, Natsume T, Takehana K, Yamada N, Guan L,
Oshiro N, Mizushima N. Nutrient-dependent mTORC1 association with the ULK1-Atg13-FIP200 complex required for
autophagy. Mol Biol Cell 20: 1981–1991, 2009.
36. Hu YL, DeLay M, Jahangiri A, Molinaro AM, Rose SD, Carbonell WS, Aghi MK. Hypoxia-induced autophagy promotes
tumor cell survival and adaptation to antiangiogenic treatment in glioblastoma. Cancer Res 72: 1773–1783, 2012.
PHYSIOLOGY • Volume 28 • November 2013 • www.physiologyonline.org
429
REVIEWS
37. Inoki K, Li Y, Zhu T, Wu J, Guan KL. TSC2 is
phosphorylated and inhibited by Akt and suppresses mTOR signalling. Nat Cell Biol 4: 648 –
657, 2002.
38. Inoki K, Ouyang H, Zhu T, Lindvall C, Wang Y,
Zhang X, Yang Q, Bennett C, Harada Y, Stankunas K, Wang CY, He X, MacDougald OA, You M,
Williams BO, Guan KL. TSC2 integrates Wnt and
energy signals via a coordinated phosphorylation
by AMPK and GSK3 to regulate cell growth. Cell
126: 955–968, 2006.
39. Inoki K, Zhu T, Guan KL. TSC2 mediates cellular
energy response to control cell growth and survival. Cell 115: 577–590, 2003.
40. Inuzuka Y, Okuda J, Kawashima T, Kato T, Niizuma S, Tamaki Y, Iwanaga Y, Yoshida Y, Kosugi
R, Watanabe-Maeda K, Machida Y, Tsuji S, Aburatani H, Izumi T, Kita T, Shioi T. Suppression of
phosphoinositide 3-kinase prevents cardiac aging in mice. Circulation 120: 1695–1703, 2009.
42. Jia G, Cheng G, Gangahar DM, Agrawal DK.
Insulin-like growth factor-1 and TNF-a regulate
autophagy through c-jun N-terminal kinase and
AKT pathways in human atherosclerotic vascular
smooth cells. Immunol Cell Biol 84: 448 – 454,
2006.
43. Jia J, Amanai K, Wang G, Tang J, Wang B, Jiang
J. Shaggy/GSK3 antagonizes Hedgehog signalling by regulating Cubitus interruptus. Nature
416: 548 –552, 2002.
44. Jiang BH, Liu LZ. PI3K/PTEN signaling in angiogenesis and tumorigenesis. Adv Cancer Res 102:
19 – 65, 2009.
45. Jung CH, Jun CB, Ro SH, Kim YM, Otto NM, Cao
J, Kundu M, Kim DH. ULK-Atg13-FIP200 complexes mediate mTOR signaling to the autophagy machinery. Mol Biol Cell 20: 1992–2003,
2009.
46. Kaushik S, Cuervo AM. Chaperone-mediated autophagy: a unique way to enter the lysosome
world. Trends Cell Biol 22: 407– 417, 2012.
47. Kim J, Kundu M, Viollet B, Guan KL. AMPK and
mTOR regulate autophagy through direct phosphorylation of Ulk1. Nat Cell Biol 13: 132–141,
2011.
48. Kimmelman AC. The dynamic nature of autophagy in cancer. Genes Dev 25: 1999 –2010,
2011.
49. Kiyono K, Suzuki HI, Matsuyama H, Morishita Y,
Komuro A, Kano MR, Sugimoto K, Miyazono K.
Autophagy is activated by TGF-b and potentiates
TGF-␤-mediated growth inhibition in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 69: 8844 –
8852, 2009.
50. Kops GJ, de Ruiter ND, De Vries-Smits AM, Powell DR, Bos JL, Burgering BM. Direct control of
the Forkhead transcription factor AFX by protein
kinase B. Nature 398: 630 – 634, 1999.
51. Koren I, Kimchi A. Cell biology. Promoting tumorigenesis by suppressing autophagy. Science
338: 889 – 890, 2012.
52. Kovacic S, Soltys CL, Barr AJ, Shiojima I, Walsh K,
Dyck JR. Akt activity negatively regulates phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase in
the heart. J Biol Chem 278: 39422–39427, 2003.
53. Kovacina KS, Park GY, Bae SS, Guzzetta AW,
Schaefer E, Birnbaum MJ, Roth RA. Identification
of a proline-rich Akt substrate as a 14-3-3 binding
partner. J Biol Chem 278: 10189 –10194, 2003.
55. Kroemer G, Levine B. Autophagic cell death: the
story of a misnomer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9:
1004 –1010, 2008.
56. Kroemer G, Mariño G, Levine B. Autophagy and
the integrated stress response. Mol Cell 40: 280,
2010.
57. Kuma A, Hatano M, Matsui M, Yamamoto A,
Nakaya H, Yoshimori T, Ohsumi Y, Tokuhisa T,
Mizushima N. The role of autophagy during the
early neonatal starvation period. Nature 432:
1032–1036, 2004.
58. Kwon MH, Callaway H, Zhong J, Yedvobnick B. A
targeted genetic modifier screen links the SWI2/
SNF2 protein domino to growth and autophagy
genes in Drosophila melanogaster. G3 (Bethesda) 3: 815– 825, 2013.
59. Laplante M, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling in
growth control and disease. Cell 149: 274 –293,
2012.
60. Lee HK, Lund JM, Ramanathan B, Mizushima N,
Iwasaki A. Autophagy-dependent viral recognition by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Science 315:
1398 –1401, 2007.
61. Leifke E, Gorenoi V, Wichers C, Von ZurMuhlen
A, Von Buren E, Brabant G. Age-related changes
of serum sex hormones, insulin-like growth factor-1 and sex-hormone binding globulin levels in
men: cross-sectional data from a healthy male
cohort. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 53: 689 – 695, 2000.
62. Lemmon MA, Schlessinger J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 141: 1117–1134, 2010.
63. Levine AJ, Puzio-Kuter AM. The control of the
metabolic switch in cancers by oncogenes and
tumor suppressor genes. Science 330: 1340 –
1344, 2010.
64. Lin SY, Li TY, Liu Q, Zhang C, Li X, Chen Y, Zhang
SM, Lian G, Liu Q, Ruan K, Wang Z, Zhang CS,
Chien KY, Wu J, Li Q, Han J, Lin SC. GSK3-TIP60ULK1 signaling pathway links growth factor deprivation to autophagy. Science 336: 477– 481,
2012.
65. Liu EY, Ryan KM. Autophagy and cancer: issues
we need to digest. J Cell Sci 125: 2349 –2358,
2012.
66. Liu H, Mi S, Li Z, Hua F, Hu ZW. Interleukin 17A
inhibits autophagy through activation of PIK3CA
to interrupt the GSK3B-mediated degradation of
BCL2 in lung epithelial cells. Autophagy 9: 730 –
742, 2013.
67. Liu SY, Chen CL, Yang TT, Huang WC, Hsieh CY,
Shen WJ, Tsai TT, Shieh CC, Lin CF. Albumin
prevents reactive oxygen species-induced mitochondrial damage, autophagy, and apoptosis
during serum starvation. Apoptosis 17: 1156 –
1169, 2012.
68. Lovicu FJ, McAvoy JW, de Iongh RU. Understanding the role of growth factors in embryonic
development: insights from the lens. Philos Trans
R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366: 1204 –1218, 2011.
69. Lum JJ, Bauer DE, Kong M, Harris MH, Li C,
Lindsten T, Thompson CB. Growth factor regulation of autophagy and cell survival in the absence
of apoptosis. Cell 120: 237–248, 2005.
70. Lum JJ, Bui T, Gruber M, Gordan JD, DeBerardinis
RJ, Covello KL, Simon MC, Thompson CB. The
transcription factor HIF-1alpha plays a critical
role in the growth actor-dependent regulation of
both aerobic and anaerobic glycolysis. Genes
Dev 21: 1037–1049, 2007.
430
PHYSIOLOGY • Volume 28 • November 2013 • www.physiologyonline.org
71. Lum JJ, DeBerardinis RJ, Thompson CB. Autophagy in metazoans: cell survival in the land of
plenty. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 439 – 448, 2005.
72. Madeo F, Tavernarakis N, Kroemer G. Can autophagy promote longevity? Nat Cell Biol 12:
842– 846, 2010.
73. Maiuri MC, Zalckvar E, Kimchi A, Kroemer G.
Self-eating and self-killing: crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:
741–752, 2007.
74. Mammucari C, Milan G, Romanello V, Masiero E,
Rudolf R, Del Piccolo P, Burden SJ, Di Lisi R,
Sandri C, Zhao J, Goldberg AL, Schiaffino S, Sandri M. FoxO3 controls autophagy in skeletal muscle in vivo. Cell Metab 6: 458 – 471, 2007.
75. Manning BD, Cantley LC. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell 129: 1261–1274, 2007.
76. Manning BD, Tee AR, Logsdon MN, Blenis J,
Cantley LC. Identification of the tuberous sclerosis complex-2 tumor suppressor gene product
tuberin as a target of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathway. Mol Cell 10: 151–162, 2002.
77. Mariño G, Salvador-Montoliu N, Fueyo A, Knecht
E, Mizushima N, López-Otín C. Tissue-specific
autophagy alterations and increased tumorigenesis in mice deficient in Atg4C/autophagin-3. J
Biol Chem 282: 18573–18583, 2007.
78. Martinez-Vicente M, Cuervo AM. Autophagy and
neurodegeneration: when the cleaning crew
goes onstrike. Lancet Neurol 6: 352–361, 2007.
79. Mathew R, Kongara S, Beaudoin B, Karp CM,
Bray K, Degenhardt K, Chen G, Jin S, White E.
Autophagy suppresses tumor progression by
limiting chromosomal instability. Genes Dev 21:
1367–1381, 2007.
80. Matsui A, Kamada Y, Matsuura A. The role of
autophagy in genome stability through suppression of abnormal mitosis under starvation. PLos
Genet 9: e1003245, 2013.
81. Maynard AA, Dvorak K, Khailova L, Dobrenen H, Arganbright KM, Halpern MD, Kurundkar AR, Maheshwari A, Dvorak B. Epidermal growth factor reduces
autophagy in intestinal epithelium and in the rat
model of necrotizing enterocolitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 299: G614–G622, 2010.
82. Medema RH, Jäättelä M. Cytosolic FoxO1: alive
and killing. Nat Cell Biol 12: 642– 643, 2010.
83. Meléndez A, Tallóczy Z, Seaman M, Eskelinen EL,
Hall DH, Levine B. Autophagy genes are essential
for dauer development and life-span extension in
C. elegans. Science 301: 1387–1391, 2003.
84. Mijaljica D, Prescott M, Devenish RJ. Microautophagy in mammalian cells: revisiting a 40-yearold conundrum. Autophagy 7: 673– 682, 2011.
85. Mizushima N, Komatsu M. Autophagy: renovation of cells and tissues. Cell 147: 728 –741, 2011.
86. Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Ohsumi Y. The role of
Atg proteins in autophagosome formation. Annu
Rev Cell Dev Biol 27: 107–132, 2011.
87. Neu J, Walker WA. Necrotizing enterocolitis. N
Engl J Med 364: 255–264, 2011.
88. Nicklin P, Bergman P, Zhang B, Triantafellow E,
Wang H, Nyfeler B, Yang H, Hild M, Kung C,
Wilson C, Myer VE, MacKeigan JP, Porter JA,
Wang YK, Cantley LC, Finan PM, Murphy LO.
Bidirectional transport of amino acids regulates
mTOR and autophagy. Cell 136: 521–534, 2009.
89. Nikoletopoulou V, Markaki M, Palikaras K, Tavernarakis N. Crosstalk between apoptosis, necrosis
and autophagy. Biochim Biophys Acta. In press.
90. Nishida Y, Arakawa S, Fujitani K, Yamaguchi H,
Mizuta T, Kanaseki T, Komatsu M, Otsu K, Tsujimoto Y, Shimizu S. Discovery of Atg5/Atg7-independent alternative macroautophagy. Nature
461: 654 – 658, 2009.
Downloaded from http://physiologyonline.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on June 16, 2017
41. Jewell JL, Guan KL. Nutrient signaling to mTOR
and cell growth. Trends Biochem Sci 38: 233–
242, 2013.
54. Kroemer G, Galluzzi L, Vandenabeele P, Abrams
J, Alnemri ES, Baehrecke EH, Blagosklonny MV,
El-Deiry WS, Golstein P, Green DR, Hengartner
M, Knight RA, Kumar S, Lipton SA, Malorni W,
Nuñez G, Peter ME, Tschopp J, Yuan J, Piacentini
M, Zhivotovsky B, Melino G. Classification of cell
death: recommendations of the Nomenclature
Committee on Cell Death 2009. Cell Death Differ
16: 3–11, 2009.
REVIEWS
91. Paradis S, Ruvkun G. Caenorhabditis elegans
Akt/PKB transduces insulin receptor-like signals
from AGE-1 PI3 kinase to the DAF-16 transcription factor. Genes Dev 12: 2488 –2498, 1998.
110. Takeuchi H, Kanzawa T, Kondo Y, Kondo S. Inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor signaling
induces autophagy in malignant glioma cells. Br J
Cancer 90: 1069 –1075, 2004.
92. Potter CJ, Pedraza LG, Xu T. Akt regulates
growth by directly phosphorylating Tsc2. Nat
Cell Biol 4: 658 – 665, 2002.
111. Tapon N, Ito N, Dickson BJ, Treisman JE, Hariharan IK. The Drosophila tuberous sclerosis complex gene homologs restrict cell growth and cell
proliferation. Cell 105: 345–355, 2001.
93. Rabinowitz JD, White E. Autophagy, metabolism.
Science 330: 1344 –1348, 2010.
94. Rathmell JC, Vander Heiden MG, Harris MH,
Frauwirth KA, Thompson CB. In the absence of
extrinsic signals, nutrient utilization by lymphocytes is insufficient to maintain either cell size or
viability. Mol Cell 6: 683– 692, 2000.
95. Robert T, Vanoli F, Chiolo I, Shubassi G, Bernstein KA, Rothstein R, Botrugno OA, Parazzoli D,
Oldani A, Minucci S, Foiani M. HDACs link the
DNA damage response, processing of doublestrand breaks and autophagy. Nature 471: 74 –
79, 2011.
97. Rubinsztein DC, Mariño G, Kroemer G. Autophagy and aging. Cell 146: 682– 695, 2011.
98. Saitoh T, Fujita N, Jang MH, Uematsu S, Yang
BG, Satoh T, Omori H, Noda T, Yamamoto N,
Komatsu M, Tanaka K, Kawai T, Tsujimura T,
Takeuchi O, Yoshimori T, Akira S. Loss of the
autophagy protein Atg16L1 enhances endotoxininduced IL-1beta production. Nature 456: 264 –
268, 2008.
99. Sancak Y, Thoreen CC, Peterson TR, Lindquist
RA, Kang SA, Spooner E, Carr SA, Sabatini DM.
PRAS40 is an insulin-regulated inhibitor of the
mTORC1 protein kinase. Mol Cell 25: 903–915,
2007.
100. Sarkar S, Perlstein EO, Imarisio S, Pineau S, Cordenier A, Maglathlin RL, Webster JA, Lewis TA,
O’Kane CJ, Schreiber SL, Rubinsztein DC. Small
molecules enhance autophagy and reduce toxicity in Huntington’s disease models. Nat Chem
Biol 3: 331–338, 2007.
101. Sato M, Sato K. Degradation of paternal mitochondria by fertilization-triggered autophagy in C. elegans embryos. Science 334: 1141–1144, 2011.
102. Semenza GL. Regulation of metabolism by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Cold Spring Harb Symp
Quant Biol 76: 347–353, 2011.
103. Sengupta A, Molkentin JD, Yutzey KE. FoxO transcription factors promote autophagy in cardiomyocytes. J Biol Chem 284: 28319 –28331, 2009.
104. Shen S, Kepp O, Kroemer G. The end of autophagic cell death? Autophagy 8: 1–3, 2012.
105. Siegfried E, Chou TB, Perrimon N. Wingless signaling acts through zeste-white 3, the Drosophila
homolog of glycogen synthase kinase-3, to regulate engrailed and establish cell fate. Cell 71:
1167–1179, 1992.
106. Singh R, Kaushik S, Wang Y, Xiang Y, Novak I,
Komatsu M, Tanaka K, Cuervo AM, Czaja MJ.
Autophagy regulates lipid metabolism. Nature
458: 1131–1135, 2009.
113. Tran H, Brunet A, Griffith EC, Greenberg ME.
The many forks in FOXO’s road. Sci STKE 2003:
RE5, 2003.
114. Tsukamoto S, Kuma A, Murakami M, Kishi C,
Yamamoto A, Mizushima N. Autophagy is essential for preimplantation. Development of Mouse
Embryos. Science 4: 117–120, 2008.
115. Van der Horst A, Burgering BM. Stressing the
role of FoxO proteins in lifespan and disease. Nat
Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 440 – 450, 2007.
116. Van der Vos KE, Eliasson P, Proikas-Cezanne T,
Vervoort SJ, van Boxtel R, Putker M, van Zutphen
IJ, Mauthe M, Zellmer S, Pals C, Verhagen LP,
Groot Koerkamp MJ, Braat AK, Dansen TB, Holstege FC, Gebhardt R, Burgering BM, Coffer PJ.
Modulation of glutamine metabolism by the
PI3K-PKB-FOXO network regulates autophagy.
Nat Cell Biol 14: 829 – 837, 2012.
117. Vander Haar E, Lee SI, Bandhakavi S, Griffin TJ,
Kim DH. Insulin signalling to mTOR mediated by
the Akt/PKB substrate PRAS40. Nat Cell Biol 9:
316 –323, 2007.
118. Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB.
Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science
324: 1029 –1033, 2009.
119. Vander Heiden MG, Plas DR, Rathmell JC, Fox
CJ, Harris MH, Thompson CB. Growth factors
can influence cell growth and survival through
effects on glucose metabolism. Mol Cell Biol 21:
5899 –5912, 2001.
120. Wang RC, Wei Y, An Z, Zou Z, Xiao G, Bhagat G,
White M, Reichelt J, Levine B. Akt-mediated regulation of autophagy and tumorigenesis through Beclin 1 phosphorylation. Science 338: 956–959, 2012.
121. Ward PS, Thompson CB. Metabolic reprogramming: a cancer hallmark even Warburg did not
anticipate. Cancer Cell 21: 297–308, 2012.
122. Ward PS, Thompson CB. Signaling in control of
cell growth and metabolism. Cold Spring Harb
Perspect Biol 4: a006783, 2012.
123. Wellen KE, Hatzivassiliou G, Sachdeva UM, Bui
TV, Cross JR, Thompson CB. ATP-citrate lyase
links cellular metabolism to histone acetylation.
Science 324: 1076 –1080, 2009.
124. Wellen KE, Lu C, Mancuso A, Lemons JM, Ryczko
M, Dennis JW, Rabinowitz JD, Coller HA, Thompson CB. The hexosamine biosynthetic pathway
couples growth factor-induced glutamine uptake
to glucose metabolism. Genes Dev 24: 2784 –
2799, 2010.
125. Wellen KE, Thompson CB. Cellular metabolic
stress: considering how cells respond to nutrient
excess. Mol Cell 40: 323–332, 2010.
107. Song MS, Salmena L, Pandolfi PP. The functions
and regulation of the PTEN tumour suppressor.
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13: 283–296, 2012.
126. Werner S, Grose R. Regulation of wound healing
by growth factors and cytokines. Physiol Rev 83:
835– 870, 2003.
108. Takamura A, Komatsu M, Hara T, Sakamoto A,
Kishi C, Waguri S, Eishi Y, Hino O, Tanaka K, Mizushima N. Autophagy-deficient mice develop multiple liver tumors. Genes Dev 25: 795– 800, 2011.
127. White E. Deconvoluting the context-dependent
role for autophagy in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 12:
401– 410, 2012.
109. Takeshige K, Baba M, Tsuboi S, Noda T, Ohsumi
Y. Autophagy in yeast demonstrated with proteinase-deficient mutants and conditions for its induction. J Cell Biol 119: 301–311, 1992.
128. Witsch E, Sela M, Yarden Y. Roles for growth factors
in cancer progression. Physiology 25: 85–101, 2010.
129. Wong E, Cuervo AM. Autophagy gone awry in
neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Neurosci 13:
805– 811, 2010.
131. Wu D, Pan W. GSK3: a multifaceted kinase in Wnt
signaling. Trends Biochem Sci 35: 161–168, 2010.
132. Xie Z, Klionsky DJ. Autophagosome formation:
core machinery and adaptations. Nat Cell Biol 9:
1102, 2007.
133. Yang S, Wang X, Contino G, Liesa M, Sahin E,
Ying H, Bause A, Li Y, Stommel JM, Dell’antonio
G, Mautner J, Tonon G, Haigis M, Shirihai OS,
Doglioni C, Bardeesy N, Kimmelman AC. Pancreatic cancers require autophagy for tumor growth.
Genes Dev 25: 717–729, 2011.
134. Yang Z, Klionsky DJ. Eaten alive: a history of macroautophagy. Nat Cell Biol 12: 814 – 822, 2010.
135. Yang Z, Klionsky DJ. The autophagy core machinery mammalian autophagy: core molecular machinery and signaling regulation. Curr Opin Cell
Biol 22: 124 –131, 2010.
136. Yart A, Laffargue M, Mayeux P, Chretien S, Peres
C, Tonks N, Roche S, Payrastre B, Chap H, Raynal P.
A critical role for phosphoinositide 3-kinase upstream
of Gab1 and SHP2 in the activation of ras and mitogen-activated protein kinases by epidermal growth
factor. J Biol Chem 276: 8856–8864, 2001.
137. Yi C, Ma M, Ran L, Zheng J, Tong J, Zhu J, Ma C,
Sun Y, Zhang S, Feng W, Zhu L, Le Y, Gong X, Yan
X, Hong B, Jiang FJ, Xie Z, Miao D, Deng H, Yu L.
Function and molecular mechanism of acetylation in
autophagy regulation. Science 336: 474–477, 2012.
138. Yuan J, Kroemer G. Alternative cell death mechanisms in development and beyond. Genes Dev
24: 2592–2602, 2010.
139. Yuan TL, Cantley LC. PI3K pathway alterations in
cancer: variations on a theme. Oncogene 27:
5497–5510, 2008.
140. Yue Z, Jin S, Yang C, Levine AJ, Heintz N. Beclin
1, an autophagy gene essential for early embryonic development, is a haploinsufficient tumor
suppressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 15077–
15082, 2003.
141. Zhang Y, Goldman S, Baerga R, Zhao Y, Komatsu
M, Jin S. Adipose-specific deletion of autophagyrelated gene 7 (atg7) in mice reveals a role in
adipogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:
19860 –19865, 2009.
142. Zhang Y, Yan L, Zhou Z, Yang P, Tian E, Zhang K,
Zhao Y, Li Z, Song B, Han J, Miao L, Zhang H.
SEPA-1 mediates the specific recognition and
degradation of P granule components by autophagy in C. elegans. Cell 136: 308 –321, 2009.
143. Zhao J, Brault JJ, Schild A, Cao P, Sandri M, Schiaffino
S, Lecker SH, Goldberg AL. FoxO3 coordinately activates protein degradation by the autophagic/
lysosomal and proteasomal pathways in atrophying
muscle cells. Cell Metab 6: 472– 483, 2007.
144. Zhao S, Xu W, Jiang W, Yu W, Lin Y, Zhang T, Yao
J, Zhou L, Zeng Y, Li H, Li Y, Shi J, An W, Hancock
SM, He F, Qin L, Chin J, Yang P, Chen X, Lei Q,
Xiong Y, Guan KL. Regulation of cellular metabolism by protein lysine acetylation. Science 327:
1000 –1004, 2010.
145. Zhao Y, Yang J, Liao W, Liu X, Zhang H, Wang S,
Wang D, Feng J, Yu L, Zhu WG. Cytosolic FoxO1
is essential for the induction of autophagy and
tumour suppressor activity. Nat Cell Biol 12: 665–
675, 2010.
146. Zhou J, Tan SH, Nicolas V, Bauvy C, Yang ND,
Zhang J, Xue Y, Codogno P, Shen HM. Activation
of lysosomal function in the course of autophagy
via mTORC1 suppression and autophagosomelysosome fusion. Cell Res 23: 508 –523, 2013.
147. Zoncu R, Efeyan A, Sabatini DM. mTOR: from
growth signal integration to cancer, diabetes and
ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12: 21–35, 2011.
PHYSIOLOGY • Volume 28 • November 2013 • www.physiologyonline.org
431
Downloaded from http://physiologyonline.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on June 16, 2017
96. Roos S, Lagerlöf O, Wennergren M, Powell TL,
Jansson T. Regulation of amino acid transporters
by glucose and growth factors in cultured primary human trophoblast cells is mediated by
mTOR signaling. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 297:
C723–C731, 2009.
112. Townsend KN, Hughson LR, Schlie K, Poon VI,
Westerback A, Lum JJ. Autophagy inhibition in
cancer therapy: metabolic considerations for antitumor immunity. Immunol Rev 249: 176 –194, 2012.
130. Wu CJ, O’Rourke DM, Feng GS, Johnson GR,
Wang Q, Greene MI. The tyrosine phosphatase
SHP-2 is required for mediating phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt activation by growth factors.
Oncogene 20: 6018 – 6025, 2001.