Lynda Stokes Murdy & McAllister Barristers & Solicitors Driving the Last Spike November 7, 1885 The “Other Last Spike”: workers pose for their own version of the last spike 1904 The Board of Railway Commissioners 1938 The Board of Transport Commissioners 1967 The Canadian Transport Commission 1988 The National Transportation Agency of Canada 1996 The Canadian Transportation Agency cross provincial or international borders; declared by Parliament to be for the general advantage of Canada; owned, controlled, leased or operated by a company who operates a railway within the legislative authority of Parliament; or are an integral part of an existing federal railway. Canada Transportation Act, SC 1996, c. 10 Canadian Transportation Agency General Rules (SOR/2005-35) Railway Safety Act, RSC, 1985, c. 32 (4th Supp.) Railway Act, RSBC 1996 c. 395 Railway Safety Act, SBC 2004 c. 8 Administration Delegation Regulation, BC Reg. 154/2004 Railway Safety Adopted Provisions Regulation, BC. Reg. 210/2004 In 2006 British Columbia and Canada negotiated an Administrative Agreement pursuant to which the Province delegated authority to the CTA to adjudicate railway crossing disputes, including disputes relating to safety. Therefore, the CTA has authority to administer the law respecting railway crossing disputes for federal and provincial railways in BC. Sections 100 to 101 of the Canadian Transportation Act deal with Road and Utility Crossings Sections 102 to 103 of the Canadian Transportation Act deal with Private Crossings “road crossing” means the part of a road that passes across, over or under a railway line, and includes a structure supporting or protecting that part of the road or facilitating the crossing. “utility crossing” means the part of a utility line that passes over or under a railway line, and includes a structure supporting or protecting that part of the utility line or facilitating the crossing. “utility line” means a wire, cable, pipeline or other like means of enabling the transmission of goods or energy or the provision of services. Filing Agreements 101. (1) An agreement, or an amendment to an agreement, relating to the construction, maintenance or apportionment of the costs of a road crossing or a utility crossing may be filed with the Agency. Effect of filing 101(2) When the agreement or amendment is filed, it becomes an order of the Agency authorizing the parties to construct or maintain the crossing, or apportioning the costs, as provided in the agreement. No agreement on construction or maintenance 101 (3) If a person is unsuccessful in negotiating an agreement or amendment mentioned in subsection (1), the Agency may, on application, authorize the construction of a suitable road crossing, utility crossing or related work, or specifying who shall maintain the crossing. No agreement on apportionment of costs 101(4) Section 16 of the Railway Safety Act applies if a person is unsuccessful in negotiating an agreement relating to the apportionment of the costs of constructing or maintaining the road crossing or utility crossing. Under section 16 of the federal Railway Safety Act, the CTA may apportion the costs of constructing, altering, maintaining or operating a railway work when the parties who may benefit from that work cannot agree. Referral to the CTA may be made either before or after construction or alteration of the work begins. Divided land 102. If an owner’s land is divided as a result of the construction of a railway line, the railway company shall, at the owner’s request, construct a suitable crossing for the owner’s enjoyment of the land. Other crossings may be ordered 103.(1) If a railway company and an owner of land adjoining the company’s railway do not agree on the construction of a crossing across the railway, the Agency, on the application of the owner, may order the company to construct a suitable crossing if the Agency considers it necessary for the owner's enjoyment of the land. Terms and conditions 103 (2) The Agency may include in its order terms and conditions governing the construction and maintenance of the crossing. Costs of construction and maintenance 103 (3) The owner of the land shall pay the costs of constructing and maintaining the crossing. location of the crossing; a description of the project; the purpose of the project; design and material standards; plans or drawings prepared to scale, signed and dated; duration (including removal provisions) environmental impact and whether an assessment is necessary The CTA has specific authority to determine what constitutes a suitable crossing, including, among other things, whether a crossing needs to be grade separated. The concept of a "suitable crossing" must include an element of safety, be adequate and appropriate in light of its intended purpose and take into account the intended use of the crossing. “[…] if the right to cross is established by the exercise of a statutory discretion, the policy of the Agency and its predecessors has been not to provide for compensation where a mere easement is created without any real or appreciable injury or damage to the railway company or its property.” CTA must determine the proportion of the liability for construction, alteration, operational and maintenance costs to be borne by each party having regard to the relative benefits that each person stands to gain and any other factor that it considers relevant. Junior or senior status is not conclusive in allocating responsibility. “… liability for negligent acts by either party at railway crossings out to be determined by the civil courts in the province in which the crossing is situated and that a part for whose benefit a statutory right of crossing is established should not be made responsible for the company’s own negligence.” CTA will not typically order insurance. [Crossing party] shall at all times wholly indemnify [railway] from and against all loss, cost, damage, injury and expense to which [railway] may be subjected by reason of any damage or injury to persons or property caused by the construction, maintenance or operating of the utility crossing as well as against any damage or injury resulting from the imprudence, neglect or want of skill of the employees or agents of [crossing party] in connection with the construction, maintenance or operation of the utility crossing, unless the cause of such loss, cost, damage, injury or expense can be traced elsewhere. contain a clear and concise statement of the facts, the grounds for the application, the section(s) of legislation under which the application is made and the nature of the relief sought. be endorsed with the full name, address and telephone number of the applicant or the duly authorized agent or solicitor acting for the applicant. A copy of the application to the CTA must be served on the respondent at the time the application is filed with the CTA. the location of the crossing (including railway mileage and subdivision, the name of the road and town and/or land title co-ordinates); a description of the project, in the level of detail that would ordinarily be included in an agreement; the purpose of the project; a list or description of the issues to which both parties have agreed; and a list or description of the contentious issues to be resolved by the CTA, on which the other party will be given an opportunity to comment. From a legal perspective railway crossings are unique from municipal dealings with private land where expropriation is an option. Railway crossings are also unique from municipal dealings with other subject matters that are under federal jurisdiction. Negotiate road and utility and private crossings of railway lines with a view to the Canadian Transportation Agency's policies and authority. Negotiate private crossings – and accept the transfer of private crossings – with a view to the legal consequences under the Canada Transportation Act.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz