Thomson backscattering in the extended lambda cubed regime for extension of the available gamma energy above 100MeV range D. Ursescu1,*, L.Ionel1, L. Neagu 1 M. Boca2, V. Florescu2 D. Jaroszynski3 and the team * Horia Hulubei National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering (IFIN-HH), Magurele, Romania Institute for Lasers, Plasma and Radiation Physics, (INFLPR), Magurele, Romania 2 Universitatea din Bucuresti, Romania 3 University of Strathclyde, UK 1 National Gaussian beam complex formalism Finite difference time domain Needed to understand and benchmark the spatial temporal effects in focus How tight should one focus? Finite difference time domain f-number values for the focusing optics to obtain peak intensities in the ultra-relativistic regime Vary the duration and the width of the pulse mirror Focal distance Focal region We Finite analyze two types time of data: difference Temporal evolution in one point domain Spatial distribution at a given moment in time. Spatial analysis: electric field τ=2λ; D=30 µm τ=2λ ; D=150 µm Tighter focus Propagation direction τ=10λ ; D=90 µm τ=50λ ; D=150 µm τ=50λ ; D=30 µm Tighter focus Shorter pulse ! Laser waist vs oscillation amplitude The dependence of the Gaussian beam waist (w0) and of the electron excursion amplitude (aω ) of the obtained peak intensity Harmonics generation prediction A. Popa, “Periodicity property of relativistic Thomson scattering with application to exact calculations of angular and spectral distributions of the scattered field”, Phys. Rev. A 84, 023824 (2011) The spectrum of the normalized total scattered radiation for a=65.9. (Ij is the intensity of the jth harmonic radiation). Experiment proposal set-up τ=10λ ; D=90 µm Requirements: - Electron bunch synchronization with the laser pulse: resolution several times below the electron bunch duration. - Highest electron density in a single bunch - Focus positioning for both laser focus and electron beam focus with micrometer accuracy. - gamma radiation detection, up to the 1 GeV range. - Laser produced electron bunches have to be investigated separately Compton backscattering using x-ray lasers for the extension of the available monochromatic gamma energy in the 400MeV range D. Ursescu1,* Romeo Banici1, Razvan Ungureanu1, Gabriel Cojocaru1 * Horia Hulubei National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering (IFIN-HH), Magurele, Romania Institute for Lasers, Plasma and Radiation Physics, (INFLPR), Magurele, Romania 1 National Experiment proposal set-up X-ray lasers pumped with 1 long and 2 short pulses D. Ursescu, R. Banici, G. Cojocaru, R. Ungureanu, R. Dabu, INFLPR, Romania Holger Stiel Max Born Institut, Germany The solution: One long two short pulses (1L2S) pumping First short, weak pulse: quickly increases the ionization Second short, strong pulse: heats the plasma Multiple short pulses generation We modify CPA system in stretcher D. Ursescu, et al., J.Opt. Adv. Mat. 2010 Multiple short pulses generation Non-intrusive method using spectral chirp in stretcher D. Ursescu, et al., J.Opt. Adv. Mat. 2010 R. Banici, D. Ursescu EPL 2011 Interaction chamber set-up TEWALAS: Vacuum compressor chamber coupled with interaction chamber Focal length system measurement CCD farfield Targe t cylindric al lens ns laser pulses Spheric al mirror fs laser pulses Zr X-ray laser The solution: One long two short pulses (1L2S) pumping Long pulse: 360ps, 87 mJ, 2.8 mm x 35 μm; 2.5 · 1011 W/cm2 Short pulse: 1.2ps, 125mJ, 3.1 mm x 25 μm; 1.7 · 1014 W/cm2 Optimization: Delay LS: 120ps-500ps; depending on target, getting shorter for high Z Delay SS: 0ps-40ps SS Energies ratio: 0%-25% in prepulse Zr XRL @22.02nm divergence wavelength Zr XRL spectral line Mo XRL @ 18.9nm Mo XRL spectral line Pd XRL @ 14.7nm and Ag XRL @ 13.89nm Pd XRL spectral line Ag XRL spectral line Sn XRL @11.9nm Sn XRL spectral line (265 mJ on target) 1L2S Ag X-ray laser results 8% SS energy split 12ps delay 34nJ/pulse Efficiency 1.7e-7 … but one should extract the energy for plasma preparation Outlook Higher repetition rate XRL (100 Hz) Test the scalability to shorter wavelengths Applications using high signal-to-noise 1L2S XRL 0.5 GeV photons production using 1mJ XRL Thomson backscattering at ELI-NP Experiment proposal set-up Experiment types: - E7 experimental area: gamma beam + multi-PW laser energy up to few hundreds of Joule for seeded XRL => monochromatic gamma, intermediate flux - E4/E5: two laser beams => bunch of laser-accelerated electrons + pump the seeded XRL => broadband gamma rays but with higher flux. - E7: gamma beam + driver laser for the gamma beam (above 150mJ energy, 120Hz), synchronous => Higher repetition rate gamma source. Experiment proposal set-up Requirements: - Electron bunch synchronization with the laser pulse: resolution below the electron bunch duration. - Highest electron density in a single bunch - Focus positioning for both laser focus and electron beam focus with micrometer accuracy. - gamma radiation detection, up to the 1 GeV range. - Laser produced electron bunches have to be investigated separately Thank you for attention Conclusions • New pumping method proposed: 1L2S • It decouples the temperature and ionization dynamics • New multiple short pulses generation method • A factor of 5 less energy needed to get gain of 55/cm • 1L2S Ag XRL: one order of magnitude more intense ELI-NP Facility 2 lasers, 10 PW each ELI Nuclear Physics High rep-rate laser experiments Oscillators +OPCPA preamps 1PW block Ti:Sapph Flashlamp based multi-PW block Ti:Sapph Flashlamp based 400mJ/ 10Hz/ <20fs 30J/ 0.1Hz/ <30fs 200J/ 0.01Hz/ <30fs Oscillators + preamps 1PW block Ti:Sapph Flashlamp based multi-PW block Ti:Sapph Flashlamp based Oscillator + fiber amplifiers Photogun Driver Laser Combined laser-gamma experiments Interaction Laser DPSSL 10J/120Hz Gamma beam Compton based 0.1% bandwidth e- accelerator X-band, 600 MeV Multi-PW laser experiments Gamma experiments Generation of gain by collisional excitation in Ni-like systems Co-like fundamental level 3d94d lasing transition 3d94p fast radiative decay 3d10 Ni-like fundamental level Ag X-ray laser simulations: 1L1S vs 1L2S
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz