Is stoping a volumetrically significant pluton emplacement process

Page 1 of 8
In press, June 2007
1
Is stoping a volumetrically significant pluton emplacement process?
2
By A. Glazner and J. Bartley
3
4
Discussion by:
5
6
Aaron S. Yoshinobu1 and Calvin G. Barnes2, Department of Geosciences, Texas
7
Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409-1053, U.S.A.
8
9
Glazner and Bartley (2006, hereafter cited as G&B) cite five lines of
10
evidence they interpret to indicate that magmatic stoping is unlikely to be a
11
volumetrically significant process during pluton emplacement. Because of the
12
iconoclastic tone of the paper, it is useful to examine each line of evidence cited
13
by G&B, and to test their conclusions against previous work. Although we
14
appreciate the alternative hypotheses that G&B present, we argue that two of the
15
five lines of evidence are model-driven and not consistent with natural
16
observations, and that the remaining lines of evidence are either not supported
17
by the published literature, or based on untested assumptions. While we remain
18
as troubled as Glazner and Bartley by some of the implications of stoping to
19
magma emplacement and magma compositional evolution, we do not think that
20
their arguments support their premise. Therefore the process of stoping as a
21
potential mechanism for magma-rock interaction must continue to be evaluated.
22
We begin by defining terms. A modified version of Daly’s (1903a,b)
23
definition for stoping is adopted; it includes the incorporation of host rock
24
xenoliths during intrusion and migration of magma. While Daly (1903b)
25
hypothesized that extreme thermal stresses facilitate stoping, we adopt a more
26
general causal explanation to include both thermal and mechanical stresses
27
associated with dike emplacement and fluid migration and/or expulsion. Although
28
G&B did not specifically define stoping, we infer from the article that the authors
1
2
Email: [email protected]; phone: 1-806-742-4025
Email: [email protected]; phone: 1- 806-742-3106
-1-
Page 2 of 8
In press, June 2007
29
use the term to describe the incorporation of host rocks (xenoliths) into an
30
invading magma (by any mechanism), rotation of the xenoliths, and downward
31
transport of the xenoliths (e.g., third column p. 1185, and throughout the article).
32
In contrast, our definition does not require blocks to rotate or be translated
33
downward, but they should be displaced relative to a fixed host rock reference
34
frame.
35
G&B cited three related lines of field evidence to substantiate their
36
argument that stoping is not a significant process: i) Few observed xenoliths in
37
plutons indicates that few xenoliths ever make it into plutons. ii) Large-volume
38
magmatic breccias do not exist, therefore stoping did not occur. iii) Xenolith
39
fragmentation results in a fractal size distribution. All three lines of evidence rely
40
on two assumptions or assertions. The first is that xenolith size distributions are
41
well documented in plutons. The second is that the only process that may affect
42
xenoliths after incorporation is thermal fragmentation.
43
With regard to xenolith distributions in plutons, seemingly contradictory
44
observations are presented. On page 1185, the authors state, “the absence of
45
small xenoliths at pluton contacts… argues against stoping”. Yet, on page 1186,
46
they state, “the concentration of xenoliths in a pluton locally may be high (tens of
47
percent), especially near pluton margins”. No references to published work or to
48
new quantitative data that demonstrate the size distribution of xenoliths in plutons
49
is presented. Rather, the reader is asked to accept these qualitative field
50
observations. In this regard we note that any understanding of stoping will require
51
intensive field, petrological, geochemical, and theoretical study of the process
52
zone between the magma and its host rocks.
53
Recent work by our research group (Wolak et al., 2004; 2005; Marko et
54
al., 2005) indicates that xenolith distributions do not follow fractal size-frequency
55
distributions, as suggested by G&B. Xenolith frequency-size distributions diverge
56
from a power-law relationship at sizes less than about 150 m2 to several m2 and
57
smaller (Marko et al., 2005). We presently interpret these results to indicate that
58
xenolith size distributions reflect a number of competing processes, including
-2-
Page 3 of 8
In press, June 2007
59
thermal fragmentation (e.g., stoping or ‘diking’), but also dissolution and melting
60
(particularly at finer block sizes), and inherited anisotropy/shape from the host
61
rocks (e.g., Clarke et al., 1998). Therefore, we are skeptical whether or not their
62
‘exploratory’ thermal fracturing experiment (p. 1187) and its resulting fractal
63
distribution of fragments actually characterizes natural disaggregation processes
64
in magmas. Given the current state of knowledge, there are insufficient field data
65
to warrant the dismissal of the stoping process based on xenolith size-frequency
66
or distribution studies in natural plutons.
67
The next line of evidence cited by G&B is that “geochemical data from
68
many plutons clearly rule out significant bulk assimilation of local wall rocks.”
69
G&B cite three examples of plutons that show no evidence for assimilation of
70
local host rocks. Although the literature is replete with examples in which authors
71
interpret compositional variation of magmas to result from in situ assimilation
72
(e.g., Clarke et al., 1988; Barnes et al., 1990; Tegtmeyer and Farmer, 1990;
73
Landoll and Foland, 1996; Coogan et al., 2002; Dumond et al., 2005 among
74
many), a thorough recitation of individual examples, pro or con, is pointless here.
75
Instead, we prefer to focus on the mechanical and thermal conditions that relate
76
to host rock assimilation and stoping: For example, does efficient assimilation
77
require partial melting of the contaminant (e.g., Spera and Bohrson, 2001), or can
78
it be achieved by dissolution (discussion by McBirney, 1979), or by incongruent
79
reactions (Beard et al., 2005)? What are the energetic limitations to the mass of
80
material that can be assimilated (e.g., Spera & Bohrson, 2001)? What is the
81
effect of thermal pre-conditioning of the host rocks? How can in situ assimilation
82
(due to stoping or any other mechanism) be unambiguously distinguished from
83
partial melting of heterogeneous source(s) and/or magma mixing in the source,
84
conduit, or site of emplacement? As outlined by G&B, if geochemical tests
85
demonstrate that magma compositional evolution is compatible with some
86
amount of assimilation of observed host rocks, then one would expect that host
87
rock xenoliths were physically and chemically digested by the magma. If such
88
xenoliths did not enter the magma by stoping (either the strict definition, e.g.,
-3-
Page 4 of 8
In press, June 2007
89
Daly, 1903a; Marsh, 1982; or our modified definition) then alternative
90
mechanisms of in situ assimilation must be found.
91
A corollary to the process of in situ assimilation by stoping is that some
92
xenoliths, particularly refractory ones, may be preserved. If such xenoliths are
93
rotated or translated from their original orientation, they provide de facto evidence
94
for stoping. In the Bindal Batholith, central Norway, we have utilized the types of
95
geochemical tests that G&B prescribe in studies of plutons emplaced at 700 MPa
96
pressure. In one example, (Barnes et al., 2004; Dumond et al., 2005) major,
97
trace, rare earth element and stable isotopic data indicate that as much as 20%
98
of the observed magma mass represented by a crystallized pluton was the result
99
of local assimilation of ‘stoped’ metapelitic host rocks. These results suggest to
100
us that stoping is a significant process in facilitating magma compositional
101
evolution at least at these pressures.
102
The final line of evidence against stoping cited by G&B involves their
103
preferred model for pluton construction in the crust: incremental magma
104
emplacement. On the basis of U–Pb zircon geochronology, emplacement of the
105
large Tuolumne Intrusive Suite, central Sierra Nevada batholith, California, has
106
been interpreted to have taken several million years (Coleman et al., 2004).
107
Because thermal models suggest large batholiths emplaced over millions of
108
years could not have been entirely molten at any given time, G&B infer that these
109
bodies were not capable of dislodging and engulfing large trains of host rock
110
blocks, nor were they able to hybridize or convect (e.g., Glazner et al., 2004). We
111
do not fully understand this inference. Presumably, G&B make this inference
112
because incrementally emplaced bodies are smaller than whole plutons and lose
113
energy through cooling so quickly that they cannot mix, assimilate nor deform
114
their host rocks.
115
We see no a priori reason why incremental pluton growth is incompatible
116
with stoping and xenolith assimilation, or with hybridization and convection, for
117
that matter. Small intrusions are capable of host rock detachment and xenolith
118
assimilation. For example, Green (1994) demonstrated that assimilation of ‘wall
-4-
Page 5 of 8
In press, June 2007
119
rock xenoliths’ in dikes may significantly affect the compositional evolution of
120
continental arc magmas. In a well-documented study of lavas from Paricutin,
121
McBirney et al., (1987) demonstrated how local assimilation of crustal rocks
122
similar to those exposed on the surface near the volcano, could explain
123
differentiation to more evolved lavas. Partially melted felsic xenoliths included in
124
the lavas formed one component of the differentiation trend (McBirney et al.,
125
1987). While these authors hypothesized that melting of crustal rocks along the
126
walls of a stratified magma chamber facilitated differentiation through
127
assimilation, the observation that xenoliths are included in the lavas and provide
128
one component for a mixing trend, implies that stoping and assimilation of these
129
xenoliths was occurring during eruption of Paricutin lavas. Lastly, we note that
130
the margins of some dioritic plutons in the Bindal Batholith acted as zones of
131
mafic magma intraplating in which anatexis of metapelitic host rocks and
132
hybridization of these compositions occurred in conduits that may have been
133
operative for 100’s of thousands to possibly millions of years (Barnes et al.,
134
2002). While not significant in terms of map area, these bodies were fundamental
135
to the compositional evolution of the arc crust. In summary, incremental magma
136
emplacement is quite compatible with fundamental physical and chemical
137
processes such as thermal/mechanical fracturing, anatexis, assimilation, and
138
hybridization.
139
The iconoclastic perspective presented by Glazner and Bartley is not
140
supported by existing data and is premised on un-tested assumptions. Existing
141
field observations and interpretations either do not support their contentions
142
regarding xenolith distributions or are inconclusive. The few existing field studies
143
on the size-frequency distributions of xenoliths in natural pluton-host rock
144
systems are contrary to Glazner and Bartley’s theoretical and analog models.
145
While G&B documented three plutons that do not show evidence for local
146
assimilation, we and others have previously demonstrated that the compositional
147
evolution of some plutons may be the result of assimilation of local host rocks, in
-5-
Page 6 of 8
In press, June 2007
148
one case 20% of the observed magma mass. Whether such masses are
149
significant is a semantic rather than a geologic issue.
150
151
References Cited
152
153
Barnes, C. G., Allen, C. M., Hoover, J. D., and Brigham, R. H., 1990, Magmatic
154
components of a tilted plutonic system, Klamath Mountains, California, in
155
Anderson, J. L., ed., The nature and origin of Cordilleran magmatism:
156
Geological Society of America Memoir: v. 174, p. 331-346.
157
Barnes, C.G., Yoshinobu, A.S., Prestvik, T., Nordgulen, Ø., Karlsson, H.R., and
158
Sundvoll, B., 2002, Mafic magma intraplating: Anatexis and hybridization
159
in arc crust, Bindal Batholith, Norway: Journal of Petrology, v. 43, p. 2171-
160
2190.
161
Barnes, C.G., Dumond, G., Yoshinobu, A.S., Prestvik, T., 2004, Assimilation
162
and crystal accumulation in a mid-crustal magma chamber: the Sausfjellet
163
pluton, north-central Norway: Lithos, v. 75, p. 389-412.
164
Beard, J. S., Ragland, P. C., and Crawford, M. L., 2005, Reactive bulk
165
assimilation: A model for crust-mantle mixing in silicic magmas: Geology,
166
v. 33, p. 681-684.
167
Clarke, D.B., Halliday, A.N. and Hamilton, P.J., 1988, Neodymium and
168
strontium isotopic constraints on the origin of the peraluminous granitoids
169
of the South Mountain Batholith, Nova Scotia, Canada: Chemical Geology,
170
v. 73, p. 15-24.
171
Clarke, D.B., Henry, A.S., White, M.A., 1998, Exploding xenoliths and the
172
absence of “elephants” graveyards in granite batholiths: Journal of
173
Structural Geology, v. 20, p. 1325-1344.
174
Coleman, D.S., Gray, W., and Glazner, A.F., 2004, Rethinking the
175
emplacement and evolution of zoned plutons: Geochronologic evidence
176
for incremental assembly of the Tuolumne Intrusive Suite, California:
177
Geology, v. 32, p. 433-436.
-6-
Page 7 of 8
178
In press, June 2007
Coogan, L.A., Mitchell, N.C., O’Hara, M.J., 2002, Roof assimilation at fast
179
spreading ridges: An investigation combining geophysical, geochemical,
180
and field evidence: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 108, n. B1,
181
doi:10.1029/2001JB001171.
182
183
184
185
Daly, R.A., 1903a, The mechanics of igneous intrusion: American Journal of
Science, v. 15, p. 269-298.
Daly, R.A., 1903b, The mechanics of igneous intrusion (second paper):
American Journal of Science, v. 16, p. 107-126.
186
Dumond, G., Yoshinobu, A.S., Barnes, C.G., 2005, Mid-crustal emplacement of
187
the Sausfjellet pluton, central Norway: Ductile flow, stoping, and in situ
188
assimilation: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 117, p. 383-395.
189
Glazner, A.F., Bartley, J.M., Coleman, D.S., Gray, W., and Taylor, R.Z., 2004,
190
Are plutons assembled over millions of years by amalgamation from small
191
magma chambers?: GSA Today, v. 14, p. no. 4-5, p. 4-11.
192
Glazner, A.F., and Bartley, J.M., 2006, Is stoping a volumetrically significant
193
pluton emplacement process? Geological Society of America Bulletin, v.
194
118, p. 1185-1195.
195
196
197
Green, N.L., 1994, Mechanism for middle to upper crustal contamination:
Evidence from continental-margin magmas: Geology, v. 22, p. 231-234.
Landoll, J. D., and Foland, K. A., 1996, The formation of quartz syenite by
198
crustal contamination at Mont Shefford and other Monteregian complexes,
199
Quebec: Canadian Mineralogist, v. 34, p. 301-324.
200
Marko, W.T., Barnes, M., Vietti, L., McCulloch, L., Anderson, H., Barnes, C.,
201
Yoshinobu, A.S, 2005, Xenolith incorporation, distribution, and
202
dissemination in a mid-crustal granodiorite, Vega pluton, central Norway.
203
Eos Trans. AGU, v. 86, n. 52, Fall Meeting.
204
205
206
207
Marsh, B.D., 1982, On the mechanics of diapirism, stoping and zone melting:
American Journal of Science, v. 282, p. 808-855.
McBirney, A.R., 1979, Effects of assimilation. In: The evolution of the igneous
rocks, H.S. Yoder, ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., p. 307-
-7-
Page 8 of 8
208
209
In press, June 2007
329.
McBirney, A.R., Taylor, H.P., Armstrong, R.L., 1987, Paricutin re-examined: a
210
classic example of crustal assimilation in calc-alkaline magma:
211
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, v. 95, p. 4-20.
212
Spera, F., and Bohrson, W., 2001, Energy-constrained open-system magmatic
213
processes I: General model and energy-constrained assimilation and
214
fractional crystallization (EC-AFC) formulation: Journal of Petrology, v. 42,
215
p. 999-1018.
216
Tegtmeyer, K. J., and Farmer, G. L., 1990, Nd isotopic gradients in upper
217
crustal magma chambers: Evidence for in situ magma--wall-rock
218
interaction: Geology., v. 18, p. 5-9.
219
Wolak, J., Blevins, M., Krueger, R.J., Martin, D.M., Zimmerman, N., Yoshinobu,
220
A.S., 2004, Field constraints on magma, host rock, and xenolith rheology
221
during pluton emplacement, Geological Society of America Abstracts with
222
Programs, Vol. 36, No. 4, p. 70.
223
Wolak, J., Yoshinobu, A.S., Barnes, C.G., 2005, Xenoliths, foliations and folds
224
in a big tank filled by many small increments. Geological Society of
225
America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 37, No. 4, p. 71.
226
227
-8-