ORIGINAL E n d o c r i n e ARTICLE R e s e a r c h Slow-Twitch Fiber Proportion in Skeletal Muscle Correlates With Insulin Responsiveness Charles A. Stuart, Melanie P. McCurry, Anna Marino, Mark A. South, Mary E. A. Howell, Andrew S. Layne, Michael W. Ramsey, and Michael H. Stone Department of Internal Medicine (C.A.S., M.P.M., A.M., M.E.A.H.), Quillen College of Medicine, and the Department of Exercise and Sport Science (M.A.S., A.S.L., M.W.R., M.H.S.), Clemmer College of Education, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee 37614 Context: The metabolic syndrome, characterized by central obesity with dyslipidemia, hypertension, and hyperglycemia, identifies people at high risk for type 2 diabetes. Objective: Our objective was to determine how the insulin resistance of the metabolic syndrome is related to muscle fiber composition. Design: Thirty-nine sedentary men and women (including 22 with the metabolic syndrome) had insulin responsiveness quantified using euglycemic clamps and underwent biopsies of the vastus lateralis muscle. Expression of insulin receptors, insulin receptor substrate-1, glucose transporter 4, and ATP synthase were quantified with immunoblots and immunohistochemistry. Participants and Setting: Participants were nondiabetic, metabolic syndrome volunteers and sedentary control subjects studied at an outpatient clinic. Main Outcome Measures: Insulin responsiveness during an insulin clamp and the fiber composition of a muscle biopsy specimen were evaluated. Results: There were fewer type I fibers and more mixed (type IIa) fibers in metabolic syndrome subjects. Insulin responsiveness and maximal oxygen uptake correlated with the proportion of type I fibers. Insulin receptor, insulin receptor substrate-1, and glucose transporter 4 expression were not different in whole muscle but all were significantly less in the type I fibers of metabolic syndrome subjects when adjusted for fiber proportion and fiber size. Fat oxidation and muscle mitochondrial expression were not different in the metabolic syndrome subjects. Conclusion: Lower proportion of type I fibers in metabolic syndrome muscle correlated with the severity of insulin resistance. Even though whole muscle content was normal, key elements of insulin action were consistently less in type I muscle fibers, suggesting their distribution was important in mediating insulin effects. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98: 2027–2036, 2013) iabetes has been diagnosed in more than 10% of adults in some regions of the United States. The prevalence of obesity (body mass index [BMI] greater than 30 kg/m2) has more than doubled since 1980 (1). Because of obesity-related illness, the average life expectancy in the United States may soon decline for the first time (2). The D metabolic syndrome is a precursor to the development of overt diabetes (3). Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia are key elements of the metabolic syndrome that is characterized by visceral obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, coronary heart disease, and increased mortality (4). The severity of insulin re- ISSN Print 0021-972X ISSN Online 1945-7197 Printed in U.S.A. Copyright © 2013 by The Endocrine Society Received November 9, 2012. Accepted March 12, 2013. First Published Online March 20, 2013 Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; GIR, glucose infusion rate; GLUT4, glucose transporter 4; IRS-1, insulin receptor substrate-1; SSGIR, steady-state glucose infusion rate; VO2max, maximal oxygen consumption. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3876 J Clin Endocrinol Metab, May 2013, 98(5):2027–2036 jcem.endojournals.org 2027 2028 Stuart et al Muscle Fiber Type and Insulin Resistance sistance correlates with risk for developing type 2 diabetes. Because skeletal muscle accounts for 80% of insulinstimulated uptake of glucose (5) and represents 40% to 60% of body weight in normal women and men, muscle is a principal tissue for evaluation of mechanisms of insulin resistance. Key elements of insulin action have been quantified in the muscle of persons with type 2 diabetes. Insulin receptors and the insulin-responsive glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) have been normal or nearly normal in muscle homogenates (6, 7), suggesting that their levels of expression could not explain the severe insulin resistance seen in type 2 diabetes. Previous studies have shown persons with type 2 diabetes had diminished type I fiber content in muscle biopsies (7, 8). Recently, the authors found nondiabetic subjects with the metabolic syndrome had muscle fiber composition very similar to that seen in type 2 diabetes (9). This study was performed to determine whether the muscle fiber composition of metabolic syndrome subjects correlated with measures of insulin resistance. Materials and Methods Materials Monoclonal antibodies directed against slow-twitch myosin heavy chain were purchased from Millipore (Billerica, Massachusetts). Fast-twitch myosin heavy chain antibodies (ab91506, rabbit antihuman) and ATP synthase antibodies (ab110273) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, Massachusetts). An alkaline phosphatase-conjugated fast myosin antibody (Sigma clone MY-32 alkaline phosphatase conjugate) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, Missouri). A peroxidase-conjugated rabbit antimouse IgG antibody (315-035-045) was purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, Pennsylvania). GLUT4 antibodies (AB1049, goat antihuman) were purchased from Chemicon (Temecula, California). Monoclonal antibodies directed at the human insulin receptor -subunit (05-1104) were purchased from Millipore. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies directed at the human insulin receptor -subunit (07-724) were purchased from Millipore. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies directed against human insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) (2382) were purchased from Cell Signaling (Danvers, Massachusetts). Subject selection Thirty-nine sedentary subjects were recruited. None of the subjects had performed regular exercise for at least 1 year. The research protocol and the consent documents were approved by the East Tennessee State University Institutional Review Board. Each subject provided written informed consent. Sedentary subjects were recruited into 2 groups: high risk for type 2 diabetes (BMI ⱖ 30 kg/m2 and a family history of type 2 diabetes) and low risk for type 2 diabetes (BMI ⬍ 30 kg/m2, no family history of type 2 diabetes). The 22 subjects at high risk for diabetes qual- J Clin Endocrinol Metab, May 2013, 98(5):2027–2036 ified for the designation metabolic syndrome, as set forward by the International Diabetes Federation (4). All 22 of these subjects had BMI greater than 30 kg/m2, visceral obesity indicated by waist circumference greater than 102 cm (40 in.), and insulin resistance with a 40 mU/m2/min euglycemic clamp steady-state glucose infusion rate (SSGIR) less than 4.0 mg/ kg/min (⬎1 SD below the mean of the sedentary controls). Seven of 22 had impaired fasting serum glucose concentrations (100 –125 mg/dL). Nineteen of 22 had dyslipidemia with triglyceride concentration greater than 150 mg/dL and/or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol less than 40 mg/dL ( 50 mg/dL in females). Four control subjects met these same criteria for dyslipidemia. Systolic blood pressure greater than 130 mm Hg was noted in 14 of 22 metabolic syndrome subjects and 3 of the sedentary controls. The entry criteria for participation in these studies included less than 150 min/wk of planned exercise for the previous year. Each subject filled out a detailed Physical Activity Questionnaire before beginning the study. The most common recreational activity was walking that averaged less than 45 min/wk. About half of the subjects engaged in some walking and/or stair climbing at work amounting to less than 30 min/wk in those participants. For the previous 12 months, none of the metabolic syndrome subjects reported engaging in swimming, hiking, aerobics, weight training, biking, jogging, martial arts, basketball, rowing, or horseback riding. Nearly half of the control subjects recorded participating in 1 or more of these activities, but none more than once a month. All of the volunteers were considered sedentary based on the activities reported on this questionnaire. Subject assessments Body composition was measured by air displacement plethysmography (BodPod, Concord, California). Serum insulin concentration was quantified after an overnight fast. Blood pressures were the average of duplicates performed after sitting quietly for a minimum of 10 minutes. Glucose, insulin, and cholesterol measurements were performed in a clinical laboratory from serum obtained after an overnight fast. Endurance was measured using a SciFit cycle ergometer (M-F Athletic, Cranston, Rhode Island). Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) and respiratory exchange ratio were quantified using a TrueOne 2400 Metabolic Measurement System (ParvoMedics, Sandy, Utah). Fat oxidation was calculated from the baseline respiratory exchange ratio by the method of Frayn (10). Muscle biopsies Percutaneous needle biopsies of vastus lateralis were performed after an overnight fast and 2 hours of quiet recumbency as previously described, using a Bergstrom-Stille 5-mm muscle biopsy needle with suction (11). The sample was divided in 2, with 1 piece frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen for later analysis, and the second piece for slide preparation was mounted on cork and quickly frozen in a slurry of isopentane cooled by liquid nitrogen. Euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp After a 2-hour baseline period, a single infusion of regular insulin was performed at 40 mU/m2/min for 2 hours to achieve doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3876 a physiological increment in insulin concentration of about 50 U/mL (350 pmol/mL) as previously described (12). Regular human insulin was diluted to 0.3 U/mL in 100 mL normal saline containing 1 mL of the subject’s own whole blood to provide albumin at approximately 0.5 mg/mL. Infusion was done using a single syringe pump (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, Illinois) set to deliver 40 mU/m2/min, usually about 15 mL/h (range 11.9 –21.6 mL/h). At time 0, an iv bolus was given, calculated based on body weight to increase the blood insulin level by 50 U/mL, generally 5% to 10% of the hourly amount to be infused. Whole venous blood glucose concentration was quantified using a Bayer Breeze 2 meter every 5 minutes. The blood glucose concentrations were corroborated with serum glucose values each hour done in the clinical laboratory. A variable glucose infusion was adjusted frequently to maintain the blood glucose at 85 ⫾ 5 mg/dL. The mean glucose infusion rate during the last 30 minutes of the 120-minute insulin infusion was used to calculate the SSGIR to quantify insulin responsiveness. In earlier studies (9), insulin infusions were carried out for 3 hours with the last 30 minutes of glucose infusion used to calculate the SSGIR. We evaluated 48 consecutive 3-hour euglycemic clamp studies with insulin infused at 40 mU/m2/min and determined that the infusion of 10% glucose was consistently stable after about 90 minutes (Supplemental Figure 1, published on The Endocrine Society’s Journals Online web site at http:// jcem.endojournals.org). The glucose infusion rate (GIR) calculated at 90 to 120 minutes (197 ⫾ 17 mL/h) was 94.7% of the value calculated from the 150- to 180-minute interval (208 ⫾ 19 mL/h) with a correlation coefficient of 0.944. The subjects with metabolic syndrome in these studies had GIR from 90 to 120 min (169 ⫾ 15 mL/hr) that was 97.1% of that calculated from 150 to 180 min (174 ⫾ 17 mL/h). We have subsequently used a 2-hour protocol for the euglycemic clamps at 40 mU/m2/min and compared these data with the 2-hour values from the previous studies. Either 2- or 3-hour single-dose insulin infusions have been used by different groups (5, 13, 14), but 2-hour infusion periods are typical of multidose insulin clamp studies (15–17). Quantification of muscle fiber type composition and fiber size Fiber composition was determined using methods described by Behan et al (18). All sections were coded and then quantified independently by 2 observers who were unaware of which subject the image represented. Figure 1 displays a bright-field image of a sample metabolic syndrome muscle section stained using the Behan technique (18). All fiber size data for the current study were calculated using the minimum diameter measured for each fiber (19). Immunoblots Immunoblots to assess the content of the insulin receptor -subunit, IRS-1, GLUT4, and ATP synthase were performed using muscle homogenates as previously described (9). Briefly, approximately 25 mg muscle was homogenized in 500 L 0.25M sucrose, 20mM HEPES (pH 7.4), containing Halt Protease Inhibitor Kit (Pierce, Rockford, Illinois) using a hand-held Pellet Pestle Motor homogenizer (Kontes, Vineland, New Jersey) twice for 30 seconds. An aliquot of homogenate containing 10 g protein was subjected to jcem.endojournals.org 2029 Figure 1. Metabolic syndrome subjects’ fiber composition of vastus lateralis muscle is different from controls. A, Bright-field image of a transverse section of vastus lateralis muscle from a subject with the metabolic syndrome. Antibodies against slow-twitch myosin heavy chain and fast-twitch myosin heavy chain are added sequentially as described by Behan and coworkers (18). Type I fibers are darkest, type IIx fibers are pink, and type IIa fibers are intermediate because they contain both myosin types. Scale bar, 100 m. B, Resulting fiber composition data for sedentary controls and metabolic syndrome subjects. The fiber composition data from subjects with the metabolic syndrome demonstrated that there were fewer type I fibers (38% vs 48%) and more type IIa fibers (27% vs 13%) than in muscle from sedentary controls. **, Significant difference from the controls at P ⬍ .01. SDS-PAGE with 10% polyacrylamide mini-gels (Pierce) or NuPAGE Novex TRIS-acetate 3% to 8% polyacrylamide gels for IRS-1 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California). Protein was transferred from gels to nitrocellulose membranes using a Mini Protein Transfer Unit from Bio-Rad (Hercules, California). Immunohistochemistry Immunohistochemical studies were performed as previously described (20). Images were generated using a Leica confocal microscope fluorescent system. Secondary antibodies conjugated with Alexa Fluors (Invitrogen) were used such that donkey antigoat IgG (A11055) was fluorescent at 488 nm (green images), donkey antirabbit IgG (A31572) was 555 nm (red images), and donkey antimouse (A31571) was 647 nm (image adjusted to blue). Wavelength window settings for imaging on the confocal scope were set (490 –530, 550 –590, and 660 – 690) and validated such that there was no overlap or bleedover between the 3 colors. Each specific labeled image was converted to a grayscale 2030 Stuart et al Muscle Fiber Type and Insulin Resistance J Clin Endocrinol Metab, May 2013, 98(5):2027–2036 TIFF file for image signal intensity quantification of individual fibers using Quantity One image analysis software from Bio-Rad. Thirty fibers were identified on the grayscale image using side-by-side color images of the fibers labeled with either slow-twitch or fast-twitch myosin heavy-chain–specific antibodies and mean pixel intensity quantified on each of at least 3 images. Each sample was coded such that the operator was unaware of what subject or group corresponded to the image being analyzed. Muscle fiber composition of subjects with the metabolic syndrome Previous studies have found a lower proportion of type I fibers in vastus lateralis muscle biopsies from type 2 diabetes (7, 8) and in metabolic syndrome subjects (9). With this relatively large group of sedentary controls and metabolic syndrome subjects of both genders, the authors of this study hoped to establish any difference in the proportion of type I, type IIa, and type IIx fibers in subjects with the metabolic syndrome. Figure 1 summarizes the fiber composition of the participants in this study. Metabolic syndrome subjects had lower type I fiber content and higher type IIa fiber content than the sedentary control subjects. Average fiber diameters ranged from 51 to 78 m, with female control type IIa being the smallest and male metabolic syndrome type IIx being the largest. Males had consistently larger fiber diameters for all 3 types (7%– 33% larger). Only IIa fibers were significantly larger (66 ⫾ 4 vs 58 ⫾ 3 m, P ⫽ .05) in the metabolic syndrome group including men and women. Statistics All data are displayed as mean ⫾ SEM, except as explicitly indicated. Comparing data between the 2 groups was performed using the independent t test except as noted. Relationships between select variables were assessed using a Pearson correlation coefficient. Statistical procedures were performed using SigmaPlot version 12.2 from Systat Software (San Jose, California). Results Subject characteristics The characteristics of the control and metabolic syndrome participants are displayed in Table 1. All of the listed parameters were significantly different between the 2 groups, although comparisons of male with male or female with female were not always different. Table 1. Insulin responsiveness and muscle fiber composition The mean SSGIR achieved during euglycemic clamp was 2.4 ⫾ 0.2 mg/kg/min for the metabolic syndrome group and 6.1 ⫾ 0.5 mg/kg/min for the controls (P ⬎ Subject Characteristicsa Controls Number of subjects Age, y BMI, kg/m2 Waist, cm % fat Systolic BP, mm Hg Diastolic BP, mm Hg Serum glucose, mg/dL Serum insulin, pmol/L Total cholesterol, mg/dL TGs, mg/dL HDL, mg/dL LDL, mg/dL Metabolic Syndrome All Females Males All Females Males 17 10 7 22 11 11 38 ⫾ 3 23.9 ⫾ 0.8 92 ⫾ 3 30 ⫾ 2 119 ⫾ 3 38 ⫾ 4 23.6 ⫾ 1.2 90 ⫾ 4 32 ⫾ 2 119 ⫾ 4 37 ⫾ 4 24.4 ⫾ 1.1 94 ⫾ 5 27 ⫾ 4 120 ⫾ 3 45 ⫾ 2b 34.5 ⫾ 0.7b 117 ⫾ 2b 43 ⫾ 1b 132 ⫾ 4b 44 ⫾ 3 33.6 ⫾ 0.7b 114 ⫾ 2b 46 ⫾ 1b 131 ⫾ 6 45 ⫾ 3 35.5 ⫾ 1.1b 120 ⫾ 3b 41 ⫾ 1b 132 ⫾ 4b 76 ⫾ 3 76 ⫾ 3 76 ⫾ 5 84 ⫾ 2b 84 ⫾ 3 85 ⫾ 3 91 ⫾ 3 88 ⫾ 3 96 ⫾ 6 103 ⫾ 3b 99 ⫾ 5 107 ⫾ 4 46 ⫾ 7 42 ⫾ 7 51 ⫾ 14 83 ⫾ 11b 111 ⫾ 21b 169 ⫾ 6 170 ⫾ 11 168 ⫾ 6 196 ⫾ 9b 198 ⫾ 14b 193 ⫾ 12b 127 ⫾ 22 50 ⫾ 3 94 ⫾ 6 108 ⫾ 20 57 ⫾ 2 91 ⫾ 8 154 ⫾ 44 39 ⫾ 4 98 ⫾ 10 181 ⫾ 29b 41 ⫾ 2b 119 ⫾ 8b 196 ⫾ 49b 45 ⫾ 2b 114 ⫾ 12b 159 ⫾ 26 37 ⫾ 3 124 ⫾ 10b 96 ⫾ 12b Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride. a Waist represents waist circumference at the umbilicus, percent fat represents body composition data by air plethysmography. All samples (glucose, insulin, and lipids) were obtained after a 10-hour fast. b Significant difference from the corresponding control group (P ⬍ .05). doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3876 .001). The severity of insulin resistance is indicated by the 61% lower SSGIR and is also reflected by the more than 2-fold higher (⫹109%) fasting serum insulin shown in Table 1. The insulin infusion (40 mU/m2/min) resulted in an increment in serum insulin of 44.0 ⫾ 3.3 U/mL (13.8 ⫾ 1.7 to 57.7 ⫾ 4.4) in metabolic syndrome subjects and an increment of 45.1 ⫾ 3.6 (6.5 ⫾ 1.0 to 51.6 ⫾ 3.8) in the controls. Whole-blood glucose baseline was 102.9 ⫾ 2.9 and 91.4 ⫾ 3.2 mg/dL and in the last 30 minutes of the clamp study was 89.6 ⫾ 1.4 and 88.6 ⫾ 2.2 mg/dL for the metabolic syndrome subjects and controls, respectively. The ratio of SSGIR to change in insulin concentration was 0.144 ⫾ 0.014 mg/kg/min per U/mL for controls and 0.059 ⫾ 0.006 mg/kg/min per U/mL (41 ⫾ 4% of control mean) for the metabolic syndrome subjects. The SSGIR correlated with several of the assessments made in characterizing the participants. Fasting serum insulin inversely correlated strongly with SSGIR (R ⫽ Figure 2. Muscle type I fiber content predicts insulin responsiveness and aerobic fitness. A, Graph of the SSGIR plotted against the type I fiber percentage in the muscle biopsy specimens from 17 controls and 22 subjects with the metabolic syndrome. The open symbols represent the controls, and the filled symbols represent the subjects with the metabolic syndrome. R is the correlation coefficient and p is the probability of the null hypothesis. B, VO2max plotted vs the percentage of type I fibers in the muscle biopsies from the same controls and metabolic syndrome subjects displayed in A. jcem.endojournals.org 2031 ⫺0.527, P ⬍ .001). Figure 2 displays the correlation of SSGIR with the type I fiber content. The content of type I fibers in the muscle biopsy also correlated with VO2max as shown in Figure 2B. Correlations between type I fiber content and SSGIR and VO2max were no longer significant if the metabolic syndrome group or the control group were analyzed separately. There were other expected strong relationships that were confirmed including BMI and percent body fat that inversely correlated with SSGIR and VO2max. SSGIR and VO2max strongly inversely correlated with BMI (r ⫽ ⫺0.778, P ⬍ .001, and r ⫽ ⫺0.603, P ⬍ .001, respectively) and with percent fat (r ⫽ ⫺0.792, P ⬍ .001, and r ⫽ ⫺0.779, P ⬍ .001, respectively). In the metabolic syndrome group, the proportion of muscle fiber type I correlated with age (r ⫽ 0.522, P ⫽ .013). This relationship was not present in the control group (r ⫽ 0.048, P ⫽ .856) or in the calculation with the 2 groups combined (r ⫽ 0.125, P ⫽ .447). The ages ranged from 23 to 55 years in the metabolic syndrome subjects and 24 to 54 years in the control group, but there were more controls in their 20s. Dropping the youngest 6 control subjects from the data set allowed the mean age to rise to 44 years, equivalent to the metabolic syndrome group. Recalculating the relationships of the key data using this smaller control group showed very similar correlations for BMI and percent fat with SSGIR and VO2max. The correlation of the percentage of type I fibers was still present (r ⫽ 0.351, P ⫽ .045) but with VO2max was no longer significant (r ⫽ 0.290, P ⫽ .102). Analysis of this muscle histology data set demonstrated other correlations of interest. The size of each fiber was greater in males than females. The type IIx tended to be larger than types I or IIa in the metabolic syndrome subjects. Type IIa diameters tended to be smaller than types I or IIx in both groups. Both type II fiber types tended to be larger in metabolic syndrome females compared with control females. Across all subjects, increasing fasting serum insulin concentrations directly correlated with larger type IIa and IIx fiber diameters (r ⫽ 0.519, P ⬍ .001, and r ⫽ 0.426, P ⫽ .007). Content of insulin receptor, IRS-1, and GLUT4 in muscle from metabolic syndrome subjects Muscle homogenate was subjected to polyacrylamide electrophoresis with 10 g protein per lane. After transfer to membranes and incubation overnight with the primary antibody, digital images were obtained and signal intensity was quantified. Figure 3 displays sample immunoblots, and the graph shows the summary of these studies. 2032 Stuart et al Muscle Fiber Type and Insulin Resistance Figure 3. Muscle content of insulin receptor, IRS-1, and GLUT4. Shown here are sample immunoblots for the 3 proteins in muscle homogenates. In the blots shown, the first and third bands were from control subject muscle. The second and fourth bands were from metabolic syndrome muscle. None of expression of these proteins in metabolic syndrome muscle was significantly different from that of the control subjects. Each subject’s muscle sample was run in a minimum of 3 separate analyses. The metabolic syndrome subjects’ muscle expression of insulin receptor, IRS-1, and GLUT4 was not different from that of the controls. Muscle fiber-specific content of insulin receptor, IRS-1, GLUT4, and ATP synthase Because the effectiveness of insulin to augment whole-body glucose uptake in metabolic syndrome subjects was less than half that of the controls, it was expected there would be a dramatic defect in the muscle pathways of insulin action. In muscle homogenates used in immunoblots, insulin receptor and GLUT4 expression have shown little or no decrease in obesity or type 2 diabetes (21, 22). The following studies were to determine whether there were fiber-specific differences (ie, type I fiber decreased insulin action pathway components) that would not be seen when homogenized muscle was used. Immunohistochemistry and analysis of images from the Leica confocal microscope were performed on muscle sections from each subject in both groups of participants. Figure 4 displays examples of confocal images of muscle specimens evaluated using specific rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human insulin receptor, human IRS-1, and human GLUT4, each used in concert with mouse monoclonal antibodies against slow-twitch J Clin Endocrinol Metab, May 2013, 98(5):2027–2036 myosin heavy chain. ATP synthase was assessed using a specific monoclonal antibody with rabbit polyclonal antifast myosin heavy chain antibodies to identify fiber type. Evaluations of images similar to these were performed for each subject. Figure 5, A–D, displays the means and SEs for the intensity of the signal generated in each of the 3 muscle fiber types for insulin receptor, IRS-1, GLUT4, and ATP synthase. Figure 5, E–H, shows the same data adjusted for the fiber content and size for each subject to reflect the total protein content in each of the fiber types for the 2 subject groups. Even though the metabolic syndrome muscle signal intensity was only slightly less in type I fibers, when calculated as the total relative amount contributed by the type I subset of fibers, the decrease was significant. This calculated decrease is driven by the decreased portion of type I fibers in the metabolic syndrome subject muscle. The total insulin receptor in the muscle of metabolic syndrome subjects determined by adding the amount in each fiber type (Figure 5E) was 19% less than that of the control subjects (P ⫽ .030). The metabolic syndrome muscle total IRS-1 (Figure 5F) and GLUT4 (Figure 5G) calculated this way were less than controls by 23% (P ⫽ .028) and 38% (P ⫽ .048), respectively. There were inverse relationships between fasting serum insulin and the expression in type I fibers of the insulin receptor (r ⫽ ⫺0.301, P ⫽ .070), IRS-1 (r ⫽ ⫺0.336, P ⫽ .052), and GLUT4 (r ⫽ ⫺0.315, P ⫽ .065), although none of these achieved statistical significance. Paradoxically, higher expression of the insulin receptor in type IIa fibers corresponded with higher serum insulin concentrations (r ⫽ 0.628, P ⫽ .038). ATP synthase expression in type I, type IIa, and type IIx muscle fibers ATP synthase (also called complex V) is expressed in mitochondria. Immunoblots of muscle homogenates showed expression of ATP synthase was not different between control muscle and muscle from the metabolic syndrome subjects (100% ⫾ 20% vs 90% ⫾ 11% of baseline control, respectively). Immunohistochemistry studies of ATP synthase expression in the 3 types of muscle fibers (sample slide images are shown in Figure 4, J–L) showed that ATP synthase was expressed at 47% to 59% higher levels in type IIx fibers relative to type I fibers in metabolic syndrome subjects and controls. In contrast to the muscle homogenate immunoblot data, control muscle expressed ATP synthase at higher levels than metabolic syndrome muscle in IIx and IIa fiber types (Figure 5D). When adjusted for the fiber diameter and proportion, the estimate of total ATP synthase in type I and type IIx fibers was lower in metabolic syndrome muscle but was greater in the doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3876 jcem.endojournals.org 2033 (0.899% ⫾ 0.018% vs 0.873% ⫾ 0.017% and 27.5% ⫾ 5.5% vs 35.7% ⫾ 5.6%, respectively, with P values of .294 and .220). Discussion The subjects with the metabolic syndrome reported here have profound insulin resistance reflected by fasting hyperinsulinemia and euglycemic clamp SSGIRs. The muscle of these participants is different from that of similarly sedentary control subjects in important ways. Nondiabetic, insulin-resistant, metabolic syndrome subject muscle had significantly fewer type I muscle fibers. The fiber composition of metabolic syndrome Figure 4. Muscle fiber type-specific expression of insulin receptor, IRS-1, GLUT4, and ATP synthase. Shown here are confocal microscopy images from 4 separate biopsy specimens labeled subjects was essentially the same as with antibodies against slow-twitch myosin heavy chain (stained blue) and antibodies specific to that of patients with type 2 diabetes the human insulin receptor -subunit (green), IRS-1 (green), GLUT4 (red), or ATP synthase (blue). (7). The insulin receptor, IRS-1, and Panels A–C are from a single portion of a slide viewed on the confocal microscope. Panels D–F, similarly, are one confocal view of another slide, as are panels G–I and J–L. A–C, Insulin receptor GLUT4 were modestly decreased in signal (A), slow-twitch myosin (B), and composite view of both antibodies (C). D–F, Antihuman type I fibers and were slightly deIRS-1 (D), slow-twitch myosin (E), and composite image with IRS-1 and slow-twitch myosin signal creased in whole muscle. The slow(F). G–I, Human GLUT4 signal (G), slow-twitch myosin (H), and composite image with GLUT4 and the slow-twitch myosin heavy chain label (I). J–L, Signal from the ATP synthase-specific antibody twitch, type I fibers represent a (J), image of the same section probed with rabbit antifast twitch myosin heavy chain (K), and smaller portion of the muscle in these composite image of those of J and K (L). Note that in each of the 4 subjects displayed here, the metabolic syndrome subjects and a type IIa fibers can be identified in B, E, H, and K as the intermediate intensity stained fibers. Scale smaller portion of key elements of bar in J, 100 m. All panels are at the same magnification. the pathways of insulin action. That the components of the insulin pathtype IIa fibers (Figure 5H). Not all subjects had more miway residing in type I fibers are especially important is tochondria in type II fibers. Four controls and 3 metabolic suggested by the correlation of insulin responsiveness (eusyndrome subjects had more ATP synthase expression in glycemic clamp data of Figure 2A) with the portion of type I fibers, but the means for the groups showed more in muscle that is made up of type I fibers. This contrast in type type II fibers. I fiber content of insulin pathway components was driven Immunohistochemical studies using cytochrome c anprimarily by the difference in the proportion of fiber types tibodies confirmed the findings, although only a few subbecause the immunohistochemical signal intensity and the jects had both ATP synthase and cytochrome c done. Samfiber sizes were similar. VO2max, a measure of aerobic ple images are included in Supplemental Figure 2. The confocal fluorescence window settings for the 488-, 555-, fitness, also correlated with the proportion of type I fibers and 647-nm wavelength-generating probes were such that making up the vastus lateralis muscle. Nyholm and coworkers (23) from the Copenhagen there was no bleedover between the ATP synthase and fast myosin heavy chain antibodies or the GLUT5 antibodies, Muscle Research Centre published results from a study of eliminating a potential artifact. In addition, we confirmed similar design in 1997. Their subjects were 25 nonobese in pilot studies of sequential sections that the fast- and relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes and 21 ageslow-twitch myosin heavy chain antibodies gave the same matched controls. Adjusting their euglycemic clamp data fiber type identification as the pH 4.3 and 9.4 ATPase to body weight rather than lean body mass gave a control GIR of 6.39 mg/kg/min and the relatives of diabetes pamethods, as reported by Behan and coworkers (18). Neither the baseline respiratory exchange ratio nor the tients a GIR of 4.46 mg/kg/min, less insulin resistant than fat oxidation percentage were different between the met- our obese metabolic syndrome subjects. Nyholm et al (23) abolic syndrome and the sedentary control subjects found that the relatives of diabetes patients had a lower 2034 Stuart et al Muscle Fiber Type and Insulin Resistance Figure 5. Metabolic syndrome muscle type I fibers contain a lower proportion of insulin receptor, IRS-1, GLUT4, and ATP synthase. The 4 panels on the left display the signal intensity in each of the 3 types of fibers and compare controls and metabolic syndrome muscle. These data were determined based on digital image analysis of immunohistochemical studies, examples of which are shown in Figure 4. For each individual subject, an estimate of the total amount of each of these 3 proteins associated with the specific fiber types was calculated from the signal intensity, the percentage of each fiber type, and the fiber size of each type. The means and SEM of these adjusted data are shown in the panels on the right. *P value ⬍ .05 by t test. For each of these proteins, less was present in the type I muscle fibers of the metabolic syndrome subjects. More of IRS-1, GLUT4, and ATP synthase was expressed in the IIa fibers. GLUT4 was significantly less in both type I and type IIx fibers of metabolic syndrome subjects. The mitochondrial marker data shown in D and H represent only the most recently studied 18 subjects (7 controls and 11 metabolic syndrome subjects), whereas the other panels represent the entire subject groups. Unexpectedly, the IIx fibers expressed more mitochondrial marker than the type I fibers in both groups. The difference between type I and IIx ATP synthase signal intensity reached statistical significance in the metabolic syndrome muscle only (P ⫽ .039, paired t test, vs P ⫽ .101 for control muscle). As with the insulin receptor, IRS1, and GLUT4 data, the total ATP synthase expression in each fiber type adjusted for fiber number and size was significantly different in the metabolic syndrome muscle. proportion of type I muscle fibers than the controls (41% vs 44%, P ⫽ .37) and a lower proportion of type IIa fibers (29% vs 34%, P ⫽ .20) and a higher proportion of type IIb fibers (30% vs 21%, P ⬍ .05). That our type II fiber composition data were different with higher IIa and lower IIx proportions is likely due to underestimation of the IIa con- J Clin Endocrinol Metab, May 2013, 98(5):2027–2036 tent by the ATPase pH methods used in the earlier study. Nyholm and coworkers (23) found a correlation similar to what we found relating fiber type with insulin responsiveness and VO2max. Glucose rate of disposal, Rd, correlated with the percent type I fibers (r ⫽ 0.39, P ⬍ .01). The correlation of VO2max with type I was also significant in their study (r ⫽ 0.47, P ⬍ .01). The type I fiber content, GIR, and VO2max data from nonobese relatives of patients with diabetes are similar to the data we present for metabolic syndrome subjects, and the correlations of percent type I muscle fibers with GIR (Rd in their study) and VO2max show the same relationship in both studies. In the study reported here, the sedentary controls were somewhat younger than the metabolic syndrome subjects. However, because the proportion of type I fibers tended to increase with age in the metabolic syndrome group, higher age might be expected to lessen the difference from controls. What is unique about type I fibers that would make their proportion reflect whole-body insulin responsiveness? Type I fibers classically contain more mitochondria that in turn mediate fat oxidation. Unexpectedly, both metabolic syndrome and control subjects had more mitochondrial marker enzymes in type II fibers. Why this occurs is puzzling, but the authors speculate that it may be related to the very sedentary lifestyle of all of our subjects before the study. Compared with metabolic syndrome subjects, the control subjects tended to have more mitochondria in muscle homogenate, more mitochondria in each muscle fiber type, and higher whole-body fat oxidation. When and how the fiber proportion is determined and why long-term training in man does not result in significant change are important questions that are not resolved. Normal human skeletal muscle is made up of nearly equal numbers of slow-twitch (type I, endurance, fatigue resistant) and fast-twitch (type II, strength) fibers that are arranged in a roughly checkerboard pattern (19). Fiber composition in humans is largely fixed and not amenable to training-related changes other than minor shifts between IIx and IIa (24). Humans, in contrast to mice, appear to have the skeletal muscle fiber composition determined before birth (25, 26). This may be entirely genetically determined, or there could be an epigenetic modification of the intrinsic genes or posttranslational modification of key development regulatory factors by maternal nutrition and activity (27, 28). The reason that a higher proportion of type I fibers leads to better insulin responsiveness or higher utilization of oxygen during exercise is elusive. There are modestly more insulin receptors, IRS-1, and GLUT4 in control subject type I fibers, but the overall muscle content of these doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3876 factors is not different from that present in the muscle of metabolic syndrome subjects. Mitochondria appear to be expressed more in type II fibers, and the higher amount of ATP synthase in control muscle fibers is modest. The percentage of fat oxidation was not different between the 2 groups. It is possible that several modest differences that were observed add up to a large difference in insulin responsiveness, but in situations such as these, additional mechanisms should still be sought. The data presented here document hyperinsulinemia and severe insulin resistance in men and women with central obesity and a family history of type 2 diabetes. These subjects all met the criteria for the designation metabolic syndrome (4). Biopsy specimens from the vastus lateralis muscle show 21% fewer type I muscle fibers but a more than 2-fold increase in the mixed type IIa fibers in these subjects. The metabolic syndrome type I muscle fiber contributed 19% less insulin receptor, 23% less IRS-1, and 38% less GLUT4, compared with control type I fiber. The decrease in whole-body insulin responsiveness (60%) is out of proportion to the diminished insulin receptor, IRS-1, and GLUT4, suggesting that there is a functional road block in another element of the pathway of insulin action. Thus, the full explanation of the mechanism of insulin resistance in metabolic syndrome subjects remains elusive, but the search may be narrowed now to include the phosphorylation status of IRS-1 and expression and activation of downstream targets such as subunits of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase, Akt, and protein kinase C. Acknowledgments We thank the subjects who volunteered for these studies, without whose participation these data would not be available. The friendly cooperation of the ETSU Physician and Associates clinic staff in performing the muscle biopsies and insulin infusions was very valuable to the research team. Research nurses Susie Cooper Whitaker and Mary Ward were invaluable in this effort. Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Charles A. Stuart, MD, East Tennessee State University, Quillen College of Medicine, P.O. Box 70622, Johnson City, Tennessee 37614-0622. E-mail: [email protected]. These studies were funded by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (DK080488) to C.A.S., M.H.S., and M.W.R. C.A.S., M.W.R., and M.H.S. designed the study; C.A.S., A.M., M.A.S., A.S.L., M.W.R., and M.H.S. performed clinical testing; C.A.S., M.P.M., and M.E.A.H. performed bench studies; C.A.S., M.P.M., M.A.S., M.E.A.H., and A.S.L. did data analysis; C.A.S. prepared the manuscript; and all authors reviewed, edited, and approved the final manuscript. jcem.endojournals.org 2035 Disclosure Summary: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. References 1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999 –2010. JAMA. 2012;307(5):491– 497. 2. Bray GA, Bellanger T. Epidemiology, trends, and morbidities of obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Endocrine. 2006;29(1):109 – 117. 3. Kahn R, Buse J, Ferrannini E, Stern M. The metabolic syndrome: time for a critical appraisal: joint statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(9):2289 –2304. 4. Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. The metabolic syndrome–a new worldwide definition. Lancet. 2005;366(9491):1059 –1062. 5. DeFronzo RA, Jacot E, Jequier E, Maeder E, Wahren J, Felber JP. The effect of insulin on the disposal of intravenous glucose. Results from indirect calorimetry and hepatic and femoral venous catheterization. Diabetes. 1981;30(12):1000 –1007. 6. Holten MK, Zacho M, Gaster M, Juel C, Wojtaszewski JF, Dela F. Strength training increases insulin-mediated glucose uptake, GLUT4 content, and insulin signaling in skeletal muscle in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004;53(2):294 –305. 7. Stuart CA, Howell ME, Yin D. Overexpression of GLUT5 in Diabetic Muscle Is Reversed by Pioglitazone. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30(4):925–931. 8. Mårin P, Andersson B, Krotkiewski M, Björntorp P. Muscle fiber composition and capillary density in women and men with NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1994;17(5):382–386. 9. Layne AS, Nasrallah S, South MA, et al. Impaired muscle AMPK activation in the metabolic syndrome may attenuate improved insulin action after exercise training. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 96(6):1815–1826. 10. Frayn KN. Calculation of substrate oxidation rates in vivo from gaseous exchange. J Appl Physiol. 1983;55(2):628 – 634. 11. Stuart CA, Yin D, Howell ME, Dykes RJ, Laffan JJ, Ferrando AA. Hexose transporter mRNAs for GLUT4, GLUT5, and GLUT12 predominate in human muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 291(5):E1067–E1073. 12. Stuart CA, Howell ME, Zhang Y, Yin D. Insulin-stimulated translocation of glucose transporter (GLUT) 12 parallels that of GLUT4 in normal muscle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(9):3535– 3542. 13. Doberne L, Greenfield MS, Schulz B, Reaven GM. Enhanced glucose utilization during prolonged glucose clamp studies. Diabetes. 1981; 30(10):829 – 835. 14. Hollenbeck CB, Chen N, Chen YD, Reaven GM. Relationship between the plasma insulin response to oral glucose and insulin-stimulated glucose utilization in normal subjects. Diabetes. 1984;33: 460 – 463. 15. Rizza RA, Mandarino LJ, Gerich JE. Dose-response characteristics for effects of insulin on production and utilization of glucose in man. Am J Physiol. 1981;240(6):E630 –E639. 16. Shangraw RE, Stuart CA, Prince MJ, Peters EJ, Wolfe RR. Insulin responsiveness of protein metabolism in vivo following bedrest in humans. Am J Physiol. 1988;255(4 Pt 1):E548 –E558. 17. Reeds DN, Stuart CA, Perez O, Klein S. Adipose tissue, hepatic, and skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity in extremely obese subjects with acanthosis nigricans. Metabolism. 2006;55(12):1658 –1663. 18. Behan WM, Cossar DW, Madden HA, McKay IC. Validation of a simple, rapid, and economical technique for distinguishing type 1 and 2 fibres in fixed and frozen skeletal muscle. J Clin Pathol. 2002; 55(5):375–380. 19. Dubowitz V, Sewry CA, Lane R. Normal muscle. In: Houston MJ, 2036 20. 21. 22. 23. Stuart et al Muscle Fiber Type and Insulin Resistance Cook L, eds. Muscle Biopsy: A Practical Approach. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2007:41–74. Stuart CA, Howell ME, Baker JD, et al. Cycle training increased GLUT4 and activation of mammalian target of rapamycin in fast twitch muscle fibers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(1):96 –106. Gaster M, Staehr P, Beck-Nielsen H, Schrøder HD, Handberg A. GLUT4 is reduced in slow muscle fibers of type 2 diabetic patients: is insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes a slow, type 1 fiber disease? Diabetes. 2001;50(6):1324 –1329. O’Gorman DJ, Karlsson HK, McQuaid S, et al. Exercise training increases insulin-stimulated glucose disposal and GLUT4 (SLC2A4) protein content in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2006; 49(12):2983–2992. Nyholm B, Qu Z, Kaal A, et al. Evidence of an increased number of type IIb muscle fibers in insulin-resistant first-degree relatives of patients with NIDDM. Diabetes. 1997;46(11):1822–1828. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, May 2013, 98(5):2027–2036 24. Coggan AR, Spina RJ, King DS, et al. Skeletal muscle adaptations to endurance training in 60- to 70-yr-old men and women. J Appl Physiol. 1992;72(5):1780 –1786. 25. Jacobson M. Development of nerve connections with muscles and peripheral sense organs. In: Jacobson M, ed. Developmental Neurobiology. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1991:359 – 400. 26. Cho M, Webster SG, Blau HM. Evidence for myoblast-extrinsic regulation of slow myosin heavy chain expression during muscle fiber formation in embryonic development. J Cell Biol. 1993;121(4): 795– 810. 27. Du M, Yan X, Tong JF, Zhao J, Zhu MJ. Maternal obesity, inflammation, and fetal skeletal muscle development. Biol Reprod. 2010; 82(1):4 –12. 28. Matsakas A, Patel K. Skeletal muscle fibre plasticity in response to selected environmental and physiological stimuli. Histol Histopathol. 2009;24(5):611– 629.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz