Traditional Historicism vs. New Historicism Literary Historicism = grasping the relationship which links a literary work to its social and historical context. do social and historical determinants manifest themselves through literary works? Can a text, for example, John Carter of Mars, be historically-informed even if it is set on Mars? History as written is an accurate view of what is really occurred. History serves as a background to literature. Historical textual background is secondarily important because the text mirrors the history of its time. applying the historical context to the texts the critic believes that he or she can formulate a more accurate interpretation of texts than if s/he did not know such historical context. Reaction to the “text only” approach of Formalism and New Criticism. (meaning can be found only in the work itself, not in external influences.) New Historicists believe history is subjective: one of many discourses. History is shaped by the people who lived it. ◦ it does consider narrative archetypes but in the context of the cultures that generate them Emphasizes “the interaction between historic context of the work and modern reader’s understanding and interpretation.” consider both the cultural and social forces that influenced the creation of a text and are revealed through a text. text as “culture in action,” little distinction between an artistic production and any other economic production history is not linear progression leading to present day; ◦ a literary text does not have a single or easily identifiable historical context. criticism should incorporate diverse discourses; new historicism is informed by poststructuralist theory, feminist, cultural, and Marxist criticism. literature = one more discourse that exists in interaction with other discourses at a given moment in history. rejects a static view of the literary work as transcendent, aesthetically and thematically self-contained or isolated (a reaction to New Criticism) ◦ Instead, a work is a dynamic ‘cultural poetics’ acknowledging “social and cultural negotiations, transactions, and exchanges” Literature, therefore, becomes historicized, as history becomes textualized – Think then of ‘narratives of history’ or even meta-narratives “History is always a matter of telling a story about the past.” Two Strands of New Historicism: Greenblatt and the American School – literary discourse cannot subvert power since it is always implicated in “the terms of the discourses which hold … social order in place”. – So since literature is part of society it ultimately cannot fundamentally alter it British and American – re-inscribe a text within the discursive context which produced it, • a project which requires an imaginative recreation of the inter-discursive exchange between the text and the other texts – ideological, cultural, social- of its day. • occupy “a position within, the writer’s ideological frame of reference”, meaning that a text will necessarily be apprehended from a certain position –that of the critic reading in the present- which is inconsistent with that of its author or its original readers. Creation is Cyclical examine not only the influence of the social, cultural, and historical circumstances on the work, but also the reception and significance of that work in the past and present. Texts are social documents that reflect and respond to their historical context. It’s kind of like a cycle… Society/culture influences the creation of a work Work is published Altered society/culture influences the creation of a new work (rinse and repeat) Society/culture digests the work and is changed by it in some small (or large) way 4 emplotments Notice how similar this is to Frye Tragic, comic, romantic, and ironic. generic deep-plot structures are shared between historians and their audiences by virtue of their participation in a common culture. The kind of emplotment historians will employ is determined by the dominant figurative mode of the language they use to describe these events and story elements. four master tropes or modes of figurative representation – metaphor, metonymy, synechdoque, and irony- which correspond to the four types of emplotment. Tropes are ineradicable from discourse, as are plots. Thus history evokes reality: it does not reproduce or represent it. “The Necklace” - Guy de Maupassant The Beginning: ◦ Mathilde Loisel mopes because she feels like she deserves to be upper class. ◦ Her husband gains an invitation to a fancy party where the upper class of the hierarchy will be in attendance. ◦ she rejects the invitation, stating that she has nothing to wear. ◦ given an allowance of four hundred francs and with the idea of borrowing jewelry from a friend she decides to attend. ◦ Mathilde borrows a exquisite diamond necklace from her wealthier friend to wear to the ball. “The Necklace” - Guy de Maupassant The Middle: At the party she is the most coveted woman. Her beauty, pose, and grace dazzle everyone at the party. Upon departing, she is forced to wear an old shawl and ashamed of it, she hurries her husband out of the party. “The Necklace” - Guy de Maupassant The End: Returning home, Mathilde discovers the necklace is missing. Her husband spends all night searching for it, but to no avail. Mathilde and her husband quickly borrow money to buy an expensive replacement necklace. The next ten years of their life is spent paying back the loans. To gather the money, they are forced to live as the lower class, taking on servants work and living in a dingy attic. One day, Mathilde runs in to her rich friend; she discovers the necklace that has ruined her life was actually a fake and was only worth five hundred francs. Maupassant's France… The France suffered massive debts to Germany in losing the Franco-Prussian War. ◦ pay Germany 5 billion francs. ◦ France in a state of financial despair. France had prominent social/economic caste system. ◦ Each citizen had their place within the structure educational reform for girls ◦ Secondary schools taught them skills to become better wives and mothers. Guy de Maupassant himself His parents were part of a minor aristocracy. ◦ Their marriage was a failure and they separated when he was 11. worked as a civil servant although he hated the bureaucracy. promiscuous man, many affairs with various women (including prostitutes ) stories often focus on how individuals are overcome by their material desires and sensual hungers. – motivators are lust, greed, and over-ambition. – “victims of ironic necessity” suffered from syphilis for most of his life and so developed neurological, mental problems, and a bleak outlook of life.
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz