ã Cell Death and Differentiation (1999) 6, 1054 ± 1059 1999 Stockton Press All rights reserved 13509047/99 $15.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/cdd Review Catalytic properties of the caspases HR Stennicke1 and GS Salvesen*,1 1 The Program for Apoptosis and Cell Death Research, The Burnham Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California, CA92037, USA * Corresponding author: GS Salvesen, The Program for Apoptosis and Cell Death Research, The Burnham Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California, CA 92037, USA. Tel: +1 (619) 646 3114; Fax: +1 (619) 646 3189; E-mail: [email protected] Received 20.5.99; accepted 21.9.99 Edited by D Nicholson Abstract Caspase stands for cysteine-dependent aspartate specific protease, and is a term coined to define proteases related to interleukin 1b converting enzyme and CED-3.1 Thus their enzymatic properties are governed by a dominant specificity for substrates containing Asp, and by the use of a Cys sidechain for catalyzing peptide bond cleavage. The use of a Cys side chain as a nucleophile during peptide bond hydrolysis is common to several protease families. However, the primary specificity for Asp turns out to be very rare among protease families throughout biotic kingdoms. Of all known mammalian proteases only the caspase activator granzyme B, a serine protease, has the same primary specificity. In addition to this unusual primary specificity, caspases are remarkable in that certain of their zymogens have intrinsic proteolytic activity. This latter property is essential to trigger the proteolytic pathways that lead to apoptosis. Here we review the known enzymatic properties of the caspases and their zymogens within the broad context of structure:mechanism:activity relationships of proteases in general. Keywords: protease; proteolysis; catalytic mechanism; caspase Abbreviations: AMC, 7-amino-ymethyl-coumarin; +PA, tissue plasminogen activator Breaking the peptide bond The emergence of amino acids as the building blocks of proteins allows for the combination of stability, strength, and structural features unique to the peptide bond. However, this strength and stability of the peptide bond also makes specific cleavage or degradation of proteins by hydrolysis much more than a simple `just add water' problem. This is evident from the fact that non-catalyzed hydrolysis of proteins requires prolonged heating even in the presence of strong acids. Thus, enzymes that cleave peptide bonds (peptidases or proteases) have high energy barriers to overcome. The term protease is synonymous with peptidase, meaning peptide bond hydrolase, and includes endopeptidases and exopeptidases. Caspases are strict endopeptidases. From a mechanistic point of view most proteases utilize their ability to force the trigonal planar peptide bond into a tetrahedal geometry as a prerequisite for hydrolysis. Thus, the majority of the available binding energy is used for stabilizing this tetrahedral intermediate rather than merely forming an enzyme-substrate complex. The ability to catalyze the hydrolysis of the peptide bond at neutral pH and ambient temperatures therefore characterizes proteases, where various catalytic mechanisms are located in a variety of otherwise unrelated protein scaffolds. At least five distinct catalytic mechanisms have been discovered in proteases, but irrespective of the type of residues involved in the particular mechanisms, the key features are identical. About the point in the reaction coordinate where the enzyme pulls the peptide bond into tetrahedral geometry, a nucleophile adds to the carbonyl carbon of the scissile bond. In some families of proteases (the metallo- and aspartic protease classes) this is simply done by making a water molecule nucleophilic through specific interactions to groups in the protease. In others (the cysteine, serine, and threonine protease classes) a sidechain within the protease acts as the nucleophile, forming a covalent adduct (an ester) with the substrate during catalysis. Hydrolysis of substrate by these latter classes occurs by displacement of the ester. The second step in peptide bond hydrolysis is the protonation of the a-amino moiety of the leaving group, which is particularly important in cysteine proteases such as the caspases due to the lower stability of the thiol ester intermediate compared to regular esters. In the case of the caspases it is the formation of a tetrahedral intermediate by promotion of a cysteine residue to act as a nucleophile that is the pivotal point in catalysis and thus, we will focus on this particular mechanism for promoting hydrolysis. The organization of the catalytic site, the geometry of the residues, and the distance between them, all have a variety of implications for protease functions in vivo. This particular point becomes very clear when comparing two proteases that uses the same catalytic machinery to promote the breakage of the peptide bond, but on quite different scaffolds as it is the case for the caspase family and the papain family. Though they use essentially the same catalytic mechanism, these two families of cysteine proteases have some very significant differences in the promotion of catalysis as well as the organization of the substrate binding site. Catalytic mechanism Like other cysteine proteases, the caspases contain a catalytic Cys-His pair with Cys285 acting as the nucleophile and His237 acting as the general base to abstract the proton from the catalytic Cys and promote the nucleophile (Figure 1). The numbering of caspase residues follows the caspase 1 Catalytic properties of the caspases HR Stennicke and GS Salvesen 1055 convention. Interestingly, serine proteases (such as trypsin, tissue plasminogen activator, and subtilisin) also frequently contain a His residue that accompanies the catalytic Ser. In the model cysteine protease papain, where the cysteine protease catalytic mechanism has been studied most extensively, it is believed that the Cys-His dyad exists as an ion-pair where the thiol proton of the catalytic Cys has been transferred to the acceptor His before substrate binding.2 Prepolarization of the catalytic nucleophile represents one of the major differences between the serine and cysteine proteases, since in the serine proteases the nucleophile is believed to develop along the reaction coordinate. While the ability of the catalytic His to abstract a proton from the catalytic Cys is extremely important, the ability to protonate the a-amino group of the scissile bond is expected to be at least as important in the caspases. The reason for the importance of the protonation of this group lies in the properties and reactivity of the thiol ester: its susceptibility to nucleophilic attack. Thus, if the a-amino group is not protonated the reformation of the peptide bond will be favored over the release of the leaving group, and consequently proteolysis will not occur. In many proteases the side-chain of a third residue plays a significant role in the promotion of catalysis. The majority of the members of the papain family contain an Asn side-chain that is believed to orient the histidine in the Cys-His ion-pair, thereby influencing catalysis.3 Indeed, when Asn175 is replaced by an alanine in papain, the catalytic activity is decreased by more than 100-fold mainly due to a significant drop in kcat.3 In the caspases this third component of the catalytic triad is not a side-chain, but rather is proposed to be the backbone carbonyl group of residue 177, which in caspase 1 is a proline and in caspase 3 a threonine.4,5 Unfortunately, the importance of this third member is difficult to establish in the caspases since the interactions are to a backbone moiety, which cannot easily be experimentally verified by mutagenesis. Furthermore, alignment of the known mammalian caspases (Accession PF00656)6 does not reveal any significant conservation in the region surrounding the putative third member of the triad, allowing us to raise the hypothesis that the putative third member may not exist in the caspase structure and mechanism. Investigations of the pH dependence of caspase catalysis have provided useful insights into the catalytic mechanism. Human caspases exhibit only minor differences in pH profiles, and all are maximally active within the pH range and ionic strength of cell cytosols.7,8 They all exhibit a rather narrow bell-shaped pH dependence with optima in the range 6.8 ± 7.2 signifying the existence of one active form of the enzyme with the increase in activity most likely due to the de-protonation of the catalytic Cys residue. In this respect the caspases closely resemble other unrelated cysteine proteases such as papain in their activity pH profiles although the pH-profile is much more narrow than that found for papain.9 Interestingly, the substitution of the third member of the catalytic triad in papain also results in a considerable narrowing of the pH profile due to the increased distance between the catalytic residues.3 This observation supports the lack of a third member of the catalytic triad in caspases since examination of the structure of papain complexed with leupeptin reveals a distance between the catalytic residues to be 3.75 AÊ,10 which is significantly less than the distance of 5.2 AÊ found in the caspase:aldehyde structures.4,5 Interestingly, the large distance between catalytic Cys and His residues in caspase structures argues against an ion pair, with the implication that the Cys may not be pre-polarized. The substrate binding site Figure 1 The minimal caspase catalytic site. The role of the catalytic site of proteases may be summarized as the ability to force formation of a tetrahedral intermediate, and the following explanation derives from the 3-D structures of caspases 1 and 3.4,5 The substrate chain (white text) lies in the binding site with the scissile bond positioned close to the catalytic residues. The backbone amides of Gly238 and Cys285 (which constitute the `oxyanion hole' in elliptical shading) donate H-bonds to the carbonyl oxygen, thus polarizing the carbonyl group of the scissile bond. The carbon is now electrophilic and susceptible to attack by the juxtaposed nucleophilic thiol of the catalytic Cys285 (triangle shading). Prior to or during the nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl carbon the thiol group of Cys285 donates its proton to His237 (square shading), which then can act as the catalytic acid by protonating the a-amino group of the P1' amino acid. During deacylation of the enzyme His237 will help to polarize the water molecule required for completing the hydrolysis by forming the second tetrahedral intermediate The substrate binding site in all proteases is composed of a fairly large number of amino acid residues that secure proper alignment of the substrates prior to hydrolysis and help promote catalysis through stabilization of the transition state. The binding site is divided into a number of sub-sites (see Figure 2), each securing a single amino acid residue of the substrate by multiple interactions. In addition to interactions with specific side-chains, binding of the peptide backbone also plays an important role in catalysis. The substrate specificity of the caspases will be described elsewhere in this issue and we will cover the essential details briefly for comparative purposes. Although no detailed studies have been done to address the P1 specificity since the original description of caspase 1,11 all the caspases are believed to possess a strict preference for Asp in the enzyme S1 pocket as previously indicated in the origin of the family name. In the papain family the primary specificity pocket is S2, which tends to prefer hydrophobic substrate side-chains. Indeed, there is no detectable S1 Catalytic properties of the caspases HR Stennicke and GS Salvesen 1056 S2 S4 S3 S1’ S1 S2’ Figure 2 The protease substrate binding site. The peptide chain of a substrate (or inhibitor) lies across the substrate-binding cleft of the protease. The side-chains of each residue of the substrate are numbered sequentially, with the `P' designation, from the scissile bond (dashed). By convention, 59 those towards the N-terminal of the substrate are called the `unprimed' side, and those toward the C-terminal of the substrate are called the `primed' side. Complementary pockets on the surface of the protease are given the `S' designation. Though the P sites constitute a single side-chain, the S sites are each usually composed of several different portions of the enzyme, since they define a binding surface. Though this convention is extremely useful for understanding protease specificity, it is important to remember that not all subsites are occupied in different proteases, and subsites are not always truly independent60 preference throughout the papain family,12,13 and the substrate backbone is even bound in a different way than in the caspases.10 When compared to the papain family of proteases, this way of accommodating the P 1 residue provides an additional explanation for the drop in activity observed in the acidic pH range. This is because protonation of the side chain carboxylate of the P1 Asp residue would make it unable to bind to the basic S1 subsite of the caspases. That only the negatively charged form of the P1 Asp residue will result in productive binding of the substrate is supported by: (i) the strict preference for Asp in this position as compared to Asn, and (ii) the close similarity in the pH dependence in the low pH range between the caspases and other proteases with preferences for negatively charged P1 substituents (glutamyl endopeptidases from Streptomyces griseus14 and Staphylococcus aureus V815). The other significant feature of enzyme substrate interactions is the influence of peptide backbones on substrate/inhibitor binding. Although the importance of these backbone interactions is difficult to investigate in detail due to the problems associated with changing the structure of the backbone, this is a central part of the binding of the substrate during catalysis. In all the caspase structures the backbone of the bound inhibitor forms an anti-parallel b-sheet like structure with the enzyme.4,5 Similar binding modes are found for the chymotrypsin family and subtilisin family serine proteases,16,17 whereas papain homologs do not show an elaborate hydrogen bond network between the enzyme and the substrate backbone.10,18 Though placed on a very different scaffold, the dominant S 1 specificity and b-sheet like backbone hydrogen-bond interactions with the substrate demonstrates that the overall mode of substrate binding observed with caspases has more in common with serine proteases than other cysteine proteases. Thus, the caspases are very distinct from the papain family proteases that display a predominant P2 specificity and no b-sheet formation with the substrate. The caspases can be considered as proteases that have adopted a cysteine nucleophile to hydrolyze proteins bound in a more-or-less serine protease like substrate conformation. The differences in the specificity of the caspases are largely due to interactions at the distant S4 sub-site, which results in the segregation of the caspases into three different groups.19 Although this classification provides a useful guide to specificity of the caspases it should be used with caution, mainly because of the different level of activity observed for the caspases. For example, the rate of hydrolysis (kcat/KM) observed for caspase 1 on WEHDAMC is around 100-fold higher than that observed with caspase-4 on the same substrate, 8 and thus, may approach the rate by which caspases belonging to other groups cleave the same substrate. Additionally, some caspases, such as caspase 2, requires subsite occupancy beyond S4 for efficient hydrolysis and thus their activity may be misrepresented by the P4 categorization.20 While the large degree of importance of the P4 interactions are well described and clearly of biological importance, the caspases are far from unique in their requirements. Indeed many other proteases have a significant degree of substrate discrimination at the P4 position. A prime example of this is the subtilisin family which, though often considered to have a rather broad primary (P1) specificity, has a significant ability to discriminate between different P4 substituents.21 Proteases depend on transition state substrate binding for catalysis, close to the tetrahedral intermediate, rather than to the ground state of the native substrate. Thus, the binding energy contained in the system is used to promote catalysis rather than association with the substrate. This means that proteases generally bind quite weakly to their substrates in the ground-state (KM values in the mM range) but very tightly to the transition state, which has important implications for the generation of inhibitors of these enzymes. Thus, in contrast to enzymes like kinases, the generation of mutant substrates should not result in an inhibitory form of the substrate, but merely in the particular protein not showing any affinity for the protease any more. Thus, the use of catalytically incapacitated mutants of proteases as dominant negatives must be considered limited due to the relative weak binding of substrates to the ground state. Only caspases that are recruited, by virtue of their N-peptides, to activation complexes should act as dominant negative inhibitors of the activation process. Enzymatic characteristics of the caspases The features described above determine the enzymatic properties of the caspases and thus, to a large extent their biological function. As with other cysteine proteases the caspases require a reducing environment in order to retain full activity, presumably because the catalytic thiol is susceptible to oxidation. This would tend to limit caspase activity to the reducing environment found inside cells, and argue against Catalytic properties of the caspases HR Stennicke and GS Salvesen 1057 an extracellular role. It is clear from work on the recombinant caspases that they require quite high concentrations of reducing agents such as DTT to achieve maximal activity (probably due to oxidation of the catalytic Cys during purification; HR Stennicke and GS Salvesen, unpublished results). The endogenous caspases in cell cytosols appear to be fully active in the presence of low concentration of reducing agents and recombinant material also retains full activity at these conditions once activated providing that there are metal chelators such as EDTA present (HR Stennicke and GS Salvesen, unpublished results). This makes apparent a related aspect to the oxidation, which is the effect of transition metals on the activity. The influence of such metal ions on the activity of other cysteine proteases has been well established for a long time, predominantly due to the direct interaction with the catalytic thiol but also the ability of these metals to catalyze oxidation. It is therefore not surprising that the caspases are sensitive to Zn2+, being completely inhibited in mM range,7 although there are significant differences in their affinity. Caspase 6 is most readily inhibited by Zn2+, becoming completely inactivated by 0.1 mM, and caspase 3 is the least sensitive requiring more than 1 mM for complete inactivation in the presence of 20 mM 2-mercapto ethanol. The inhibition of caspases by Zn2+ may explain the inhibitory action of this metal on apoptosis,22,23 though the interaction is blocked by thiol compounds,7 and therefore presumably highly dependent on the redox potential of the cell. Ca2+ has little effect on the activity of the caspases at concentrations up to 100 mM, although minor effect on the activity of caspase-7 have been reported.8 Thus, the reported role of Ca2+ in apoptosis, see for example,24 is unlikely to be due to any effect on the caspases. Activation of the caspases In general the activation of most proteases takes place by limited proteolysis leading to removal of an N-terminal activation peptide, also known as the propeptide. This mechanism of activation is used by the majority of all known proteases with the notable exception of the caspases. In the papain like enzymes such as cathepsin B and L the propeptide binds in the active site cleft much like a substrate but in reverse direction, physically preventing access to the substrate binding site.25,26 In this case the activation occurs by auto-catalytic removal of the propeptide in trans (an intermolecular reaction). In contrast the propeptides of the serine proteases a-lytic protease and subtilisin bind more like a natural substrate and the activation is unregulated, occurring by cleavage of the bond between the residues occupying the S1 and S1' subsites of the enzymes.27 ± 30 This reaction occurs in cis (an intra molecular reaction). Interestingly the propeptides of all these proteases are potent inhibitors of the mature enzymes and usually characterized by low to sub-nano molar binding constants.31 ± 34 In the activation mechanism utilized by members of the chymotrypsin family the propeptide does not physically block the active site. Here activation occurs when propeptide cleavage reveals a new N-terminal a-amino group that inserts into the core of the protein, and secures formation of the active site.35 ± 37 In cases where such events are required it has been demonstrated that addition of specific peptides can activate the proteases, the perhaps most well known example being that of trypsin.38 Recently, an analogous mode of activation has been suggested for the caspases in the activation of caspase-3 by RGD containing peptides.39 The mechanism of this activation, which is postulated to be a direct effect, is unclear and indeed attempts in our laboratory to repeat the original observation using cytosolic extracts as well as immuno-precipitated or purified recombinant procaspase-3 have failed (HR Stennicke, QL Deveraux and GS Salvesen, unpublished results). In contrast to other mechanisms, caspase activation primarily occurs through cleavage within a segment at an internal position in the zymogen. In caspase 1, removal of the N-peptide has been implicated as a maturation step,40 but simply removing the N-peptide is not sufficient for activation. On the other hand, the biochemical properties of the short Npeptide caspases such as caspase-3, which are involved in the execution of the apoptotic signal, are not affected by the removal of the N-peptide.41 Additionally, caspase-9, which is a key initiator of the post-mitochondrial cell death pathway, does not get its large N-peptide removed during activation.42 ± 45 Thus the function of the individual N-peptide extensions of the caspases is not conserved. It is generally agreed that initiator caspases transmit the proteolytic signal by directly processing executioner zymogens, and at least in vitro activation of the executioner caspase zymogens by the initiators is efficient and fast (Table 1). However, the molecular mechanism leading to the active enzyme is currently not known since there are little available biochemical data and no structural models available for the zymogens. One possibility is that the cleavage of the inter-domain linker results in formation of the catalytic dyad, which is distorted in the zymogen due to tension in the protein. The degree of distortion imposed on the catalytic dyad would then be a function of the length of the inter-domain linker and indeed caspases containing relatively long inter-domain linkers (caspases 8 and 9) have been demonstrated to possess activity in their zymogen forms. Possibly this is a key to the mechanism by which activation occurs in the activator complexes. The importance of zymogenicity Interestingly, depending upon expression conditions of recombinant proteins, one can obtain either processed active caspase or unprocessed zymogen from the same construct, at least for caspases 3, 7 and 9.41,45,46 For example, a short induction time (530 min) yields unprocessed zymogens but longer ones (43 h) yield fully processed enzymes. SignifiTable 1 Activation rates of executioner caspase zymogens by selected initiators (M71 s71) Pro-caspase 3 Pro-caspase 7 Caspase 8 Caspase 10 Granzyme B 2.26106 4.46106 0.76106 1.26106 4.86106 6.46106 Puri®ed recombinant zymogens of the executioner caspases 3 and 7 are activated most ef®ciently by the serine protease granzyme B, followed by the apical caspase 8, and then caspase 10. Data for caspase-3 are taken from41 and for caspase-7 from HR Stennicke and GS Salvesen, unpublished results Catalytic properties of the caspases HR Stennicke and GS Salvesen 1058 cantly, even very short expression times and low inducer concentrations have failed to yield caspase 8 zymogens in our hands (HR Stennicke and GS Salvesen, unpublished data). Caspase 8 processes itself extremely rapidly upon heterologous expression in E. coli, suggesting that the zymogen must possess significant intrinsic proteolytic activity, allowing for autoprocessing. Indeed, a non-processing caspase 8 zymogen possesses 1% of the activity of the fully processed enzyme,47 a very substantial activity compared with most protease zymogens. These observations are the basis for the induced proximity hypothesis for the in vivo activation of caspase 8, whose assembly is forced by ligation of death receptors in a process mediated by specific adaptor proteins.48 This clustering of zymogens possessing intrinsic enzymatic activity forces processing in trans, and activation of the first protease in the death receptor pathway to apoptosis.47,49,50 An analogous activation of pro-caspase 9 by zymogen clustering may account for the origin of the postmitochondrial death pathway,51,52 and the mechanism may be highly conserved since the worm caspase CED-3 may be similarly activated.53,54 These observations stress the importance of zymogenicity (defined in Table 2) in triggering the cell death signaling pathway. The interesting range of zymogenicity values displayed by members of the caspase family is mirrored by members of the chymotrypsin family of serine proteases, with trypsin and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) shown for comparison (Table 2). Presumably enzymes such as tPA and caspase 9 have dispensed with the requirement for proteolysis as a mechanism of substantially increasing their activities, because allosteric regulators substitute this function ± fibrin for tPA and Apaf-1 for caspase 9. In the case of tPA, specific side-chain interactions, absent in other members of the chymotrypsin family, allow activity of the zymogen. However, in the absence of a molecular structure of the caspase 8 and 9 zymogens, little evidence is available to explain the high activity of the unprocessed protein. One clue is suggested by the structure of active caspases 1 and 3, each composed of two catalytic units thought to arise from dimerization of monomeric zymogens (reviewed in55). If activation of zymogens of the initiator caspases 8, 9 and CED-3 operates by clustering, then the clustering phenomenon may be explained by adapterdriven homo-dimerization of monomers. Origin of the caspases? A puzzling feature in the caspases is the current absence of any reported homologs outside of this tightly knit family Table 2 Zymogenicity of selected proteases Zymogenicity Caspase Caspase Caspase 3 8 9 Trypsin tpA 410,000 410,000 2 ± 10 100 10 Zymogenicity is the ratio of the activity of a processed protease to the activity of the zymogen on any given substrate. It is a measure of how effectively the zymogen is constrained, with a large number corresponding to insigni®cant activity of the zymogen. Data for trypsin and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) are taken from58 restricted to animals. There should be homologs consisting of the same fold that would help to shed light on the origin of the family. One of the most notable properties of the caspases is the dominance of the S1 pocket, which caspases share in principle with serine proteases of the chymotrypsin family, and in particular with granzyme B.56 Does this principle extend to other cysteine protease families that also have a dominant P1 specificity? Are there other families that use a dominant S1 pocket, but with different specificity, positioned on the currently unique caspase fold? Such a possibility has been proposed for the bacterial proteases clostripain and R-gingipain (dominant P 1 specificity for Arg), K-gingipain (dominant P1 specificity for Lys), and the plant and animal legumains (dominant P1 specificity for Asn). Though all are cysteine proteases, they may share the caspase fold, and therefore represent very distant homologs.57 Thus, we may so far only have found a few of the members of the family sharing the caspase fold and may still find a number of proteases that will eventually close the evolutionary gap between the bacterial and the mammalian members. References 1. Alnemri ES, Livingston DJ, Nicholson DW, Salvesen G, Thornberry NA, Wong WW and Yuan J (1996) Human ICE/CED-3 protease nomenclature. Cell 87: 171 2. Lewis ER, Johnson FA and Shafer JA (1981) Effect of cystein-25 on the ionization of histidine-159 in papain as determined by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Evidence for a His-159-Cys-25 ion pair and its possible role in catalysis. Biochemistry 20: 48 ± 51 3. Vernet T, Tessier DC, Chatellier J, Plouffe C, Lee TS, Thomas DY, Storer AC and Menard R (1995) Structural and functional roles of asparagine 175 in the cysteine protease papain. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 16645 ± 16652 4. Wilson KP, Black JA, Thomson JA, Kim EE, Griffith JP, Navia MA, Murcko MA, Chambers SP, Aldape RA, Raybuck SA and Livingston DJ (1994) Structure and mechanism of interleukin-1 beta converting enzyme. Nature 370: 270 ± 275 5. Rotonda J, Nicholson DW, Fazil KM, Gallant M, Gareau Y, Labelle M, Peterson EP, Rasper DM, Tuel R, Vaillancourt JP, Thornberry NA and Becher JW (1996) The three-dimensional structure of apopain/CPP32, a key mediator of apoptosis. Nature Struct. Biol. 3: 619 ± 625 6. Bateman A, Birney E, Durbin R, Eddy SR, Finn RD and Sonnhammer EL (1999) Pfam 3.1: 1313 multiple alignments and profile HMMs match the majority of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 27: 260 ± 262 7. Stennicke HR and Salvesen GS (1997) Biochemical characteristics of caspases3, -6, -7, and -8. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 25719 ± 25723 8. Garcia-Calvo M, Peterson EP, Rasper DM, Vaillancourt JP, Zamboni R, Nicholson DW and Thornberry NA (1999) Purification and catalytic properties of human caspase family members. Cell Death Diff. 6: 362 ± 369 9. Menard R, Carriere J, Laflamme P, Plouffe C, Khouri HE, Vernet T, Tessier DC, Thomas DY and Storer AC (1991) Contribution of the glutamine 19 side chain to transition-state stabilization in the oxyanion hole of papain. Biochemistry 30: 8924 ± 8928 10. Schroder E, Phillips C, Garman E, Harlos K and Crawford C (1993) X-ray crystallographic structure of a papain-leupeptin complex. FEBS Lett. 315: 38 ± 42 11. Thornberry NA, Bull HG, Calaycay JR, Chapman KT, Howard AD, Kostura MJ, Miller DK, Molineaux SM, Weidner JR, Aunins J, Elliston KO, Ayala JM, Casano FJ, Chin J, Ding GJF, Egger LA, Gaffney EP, Limjuco G, Palyha OC, Raju SM, Rolando AM, Salley JP, Yamin TT and Tocci MJ (1992) A novel heterodimeric cysteine protease is required for interleukin-1beta processing in monocytes. Nature 356: 768 ± 774 12. Shaw E (1990) Cysteinyl proteinases and their selective inactivation. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 63: 271 ± 347 13. Berger A and Schechter I (1970) Mapping the active site of papain with the aid of peptide substrates and inhibitors. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. [Biol.]. 257: 249 ± 264 Catalytic properties of the caspases HR Stennicke and GS Salvesen 1059 14. Stennicke HR, Birktoft JJ and Breddam K (1996) Characterization of the S1 binding site of the glutamic acid-specific protease from Streptomyces griseus. Protein Sci. 5: 2266 ± 2275 15. Breddam K and Meldal M (1992) Substrate preferences of glutamic-acid-specific endopeptidases assessed by synthetic peptide substrates based on intramolecular fluorescence quenching. Eur. J. Biochem. 206: 103 ± 107 16. Frigerio F, Coda A, Pugliese L, Lionetti C, Menegatti E, Amiconi G, Schnebli HP, Ascenzi P and Bolognesi M (1992) Crystal and molecular structure of the bovine alpha-chymotrypsin-eglinccomplexat2×0 AÊ resolution.J.Mol.Biol.225:107 ± 123 17. Heinz DW, Priestle JP, Rahuel J, Wilson KS and GruÈtter MG (1991) Refined crystal structures of subtilisin novo in complex with wild-type and two mutant eglins. Comparison with other serine proteinase inhibitor complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 217: 353 ± 371 18. Drenth J, Kalk KH and Swen HM (1976) Binding of chloromethyl ketone substrate analogues to crystalline papain. Biochemistry 15: 3731 ± 3738 19. Thornberry NA, Rano TA, Peterson EP, Rasper DM, Timkey T, Garcia-Calvo M, Houtzager VM, Nordstrom PA, Roy S, Vaillancourt JP, Chapman KT and NIcholson DW (1997) A combinatorial approach defines specificities of members of the caspase family and granzyme B. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 17907 ± 17911 20. Talanian RV, Quinlan C, Trautz S, Hackett MC, Mankovich JA, Banach D, Ghayur T, Brady KD and Wong WW (1997) Substrate specificities of caspase family proteases. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 9677 ± 9682 21. Grùn H, Meldal M and Breddam K (1992) Extensive comparison of the substrate preference of two subtilisins as determined with peptide substrates which are based on the principle of intramolecular quenching. Biochemistry 31: 6011 ± 6018 22. TakahashiA,AlnemriES,LazebnikYA,Fernandes-AlnemriT,LitwackG,MoirRD, Goldman RD, Poirier GG, Kaufmann SH and Earnshaw WC (1996) Cleavage of lamin A by Mch2 alpha but no CPP32: multiple interleukin 1 beta-converting enzyme-relatedproteaseswithdistinctsubstraterecognitionpropertiesareactive in apoptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93: 8395 ± 8400 23. Perry DK, Smyth MJ, Stennicke HR, Salvesen GS, Duriez P, Poirier GG and Hannum YA (1997) Zinc is a potent inhibitor of the apoptotic protease, caspase-3. A novel target for zinc in the inhibition of apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 18530 ± 18533 24. Bian X, Hughes Jr FM, Huang Y, Cidlowski JA and Putney Jr JW (1997) Roles of cytoplasmic Ca2+ and intracellular Ca2+ stores in induction and suppression of apoptosis in S49 cells. Am. J. Physiol. 272: C1241 ± C1249 25. Cygler M, Sivaraman J, Grochulski P, Coulombe R, Storer AC and Mort JS (1996) Structure of rat procathepsin B: model for inhibition of cysteine protease activity by the proregion. Structure 4: 405 ± 416 26. Coulombe R, Grochulski P, Sivaraman J, Menard R, Mort JS and Cygler M (1996) Structure of human procathepsin L reveals the molecular basis of inhibition by the prosegment. EMBO J. 15: 5492 ± 5503 27. Gallagher T, Gilliland G, Wang L and Bryan P (1995) The prosegment-subtilisin BPN' complex: crystal structure of a specific `foldase'. Structure 3: 907 ± 914 28. Jain SC, Shinde U, Li Y, Inouye M and Berman HM (1998) The crystal structure of an autoprocessed Ser221Cys-subtilisin E-propeptide complex at 2.0 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 284: 137 ± 144 29. Peters RJ, Shiau AK, Sohl JL, Anderson DE, Tang G, Silen JL and Agard DA (1998) Pro region C-terminus:protease active site interactions are critical in catalyzing the folding of alpha-lytic protease. Biochemistry 37: 12058 ± 12067 30. Sauter NK, Mau T, Rader SD and Agard DA (1998) Structure of alpha-lytic protease complexes with its pro region. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5: 945 ± 950 31. Hu Z, Haghjoo K and Jordan F (1996) Further evidence for the structure of the subtilisin propeptide and for its interactions with mature subtilisin. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 3375 ± 3384 32. Markaryan A, Lee JD, Sirakova TD and Kolattukudy PE (1996) Specific inhibition of mature fungal serine proteinases and metalloproteinases by their propeptides. J. Bacteriol. 178: 2211 ± 2215 33. Cygler M and Mort JS (1997) Proregion structure of members of the papain superfamily. Mode of inhibition of enzymatic activity. Biochimie 79: 645 ± 652 34. Baker D, Silen JL and Agard DA (1992) Protease pro region required for folding is a potent inhibitor of the mature enzyme. Proteins 12: 339 ± 344 35. Freer ST, Kraut J, Robertus JD, Wright HT and Xuong NH (1970) Chymotrypsinogen: 2.5-angstrom crystal structure, comparison with alpha-chymotrypsin, and implications for zymogen activation. Biochemistry 9: 1997 ± 2009 36. Fehlhammer H, Bode W and Huber R (1977) Crystal structure of bovine trypsinogen at 1-8 A resolution. II. Crystallographic refinement, refined crystal structure and comparison with bovine trypsin. J. Mol. Biol. 111: 415 ± 438 37. Wang D, Bode W and Huber R (1985) Bovine chymotrypsinogen A X-ray crystal structure analysis and refinement of a new crystal form at 1.8 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 185: 595 ± 624 38. Bode W (1979) The transition of bovine trypsinogen to a trypsin-like state upon strong ligand binding: the binding of the pancreatic trypsin inhibitor and of isoleucine-valine and of sequentially related peptides to trypsinogen and to pguanidinobenzoate-trypsinogen. J. Mol. Biol. 127: 357 ± 374 39. Buckley CD, Pilling D, Henriquez NV, Parsonage G, Threlfall K, Scheel-Toellner D, Simmons DL, Akbar AN, Lord JM and Salmon M (1999) RGD peptides induce apoptosis by direct caspase-3 activation. Nature 397: 534 ± 539 40. Yamin T-T, Ayala JM and Miller DK (1996) Activation of the native 45-kDa precursor form of interleukin-1-converting enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 13273 ± 13282 41. Stennicke HR, Jurgensmeier JM, Shin H, Deveraux Q, Wolf BB, Yang X, Zhou Q, Ellerby HM, Ellerby LM, Bredesen D, Green DR, Reed JC, Froelich CJ and Salvesen GS (1998) Pro-caspase-3 is a major physiologic target of caspase-8. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 27084 ± 27090 42. Li P, Nijhawan D, Budihardjo I, Srinivasula SM, Ahmad M, Alnemri ES and Wang X (1997) Cytochrome c and dATP-dependent formation of Apaf-1/Caspase-9 complex initiates an apoptotic protease cascade. Cell 91: 479 ± 489 43. Duan H, Orth K, Chinnaiyan AM, Poirier GG, Froelich CJ, He W-W and Dixit VM (1996) ICE-LAP6, a novel member of the ICE/Ced-3 gene family, is activated by the cytotoxic T cell protease granzyme B. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 16720 ± 16724 44. Srinivasula SM, Fernandes-Alnemri T, Zangrilli J, Robertson N, Armstrong RC, Wang L, Trapani JA, Tomaselli KJ, Litwack G and Alnemri ES (1996) The Ced-3/ interleukin 1beta converting enzyme-like homolog Mch6 and the lamin-cleaving enzyme Mch2alpha are substrates for the apoptotic mediator CPP32. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 27099 ± 27106 45. Stennicke HR, Deveraux QL, Humke EW, Reed JC, Dixit VM and Salvesen GS (1999) Caspase-9 can be activated without proteolytic processing. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 8359 ± 8362 46. Zhou Q and Salvesen GS (1997) Activation of pro-caspase-7 by serine proteases includes a non-canonical specificity. Biochem. J. 324: 361 ± 364 47. Muzio M, Stockwell BR, Stennicke HR, Salvesen GS and Dixit VM (1998) An induced proximity model for caspase-8 activation. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 2926 ± 2930 48. Ware CF, Santee S and Glass A (1998) Tumor necrosis factor-related ligands and receptors. In: The Cytokine Handbook, 3rd edn, Academic Press Limited, San Deigo; 1998, pp. 549 ± 592. 49. Martin DA, Siegel RM, Zheng L and Lenardo MJ (1998) Membrane oligomerization and cleavage activates the caspase-8 (FLICE/MACHalpha1) death signal. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 4345 ± 4349 50. Yang X, Chang HY and Baltimore D (1998) Autoproteolytic activation of procaspase by oligomerization. Mol. Cell 1: 319 ± 325 51. Zou H, Li Y, Liu X and Wang X (1999) An APAF-1.Cytochrome c multimeric complex is a functional apoptosome that activates procaspase-9. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 11549 ± 11556 52. Srinivasula SM, Ahmad M, Fernandes-Alnemri T and Alnemri ES (1998) Autoactivation of procaspase-9 by Apaf-1-mediated oligomerization. Mol. Cell. 1: 949 ± 957 53. Yang X, Chang HY and Baltimore D (1998) Essential role of CED-4 oligomerization in CED-3 activation and apoptosis. Science 281: 1355 ± 1357 54. Chinnaiyan AM, Chaudhary D, O'Rourke K, Koonin EV and Dixit VM (1997) Role of CED-4 in the activation of CED-3. Nature 388: 728 ± 729 55. Thornberry NA and Lazebnik Y (1998) Caspases: enemies within. Science 281: 1312 ± 1316 56. Odake S, Kam CM, Narasimhan L, Poe M, Blake JT, Krahenbuhl O and Powers JC (1991) Human and murine cytotoxic T lymphocyte serine proteases: Subsite mapping with peptide thioester substrates and inhibition of enzyme activity and cytolysis by isocoumarins. Biochem. U.S.A. 30: 2217 ± 2227 57. Chen JM, Rawlings ND, Stevens RA and Barrett AJ (1998) Identification of the active site of legumain links it to caspases, clostripain and gingipains in a new clan of cysteine endopeptidases. FEBS Lett. 441: 361 ± 365 58. Tachias K and Madison EL (1996) Converting tissue-type plasminogen activator into a zymogen. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 28749 ± 28752 59. Schechter I and Berger M (1967) On the size of the active site in proteases. I. Papain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 27: 157 ± 162 60. Gron H and Breddam K (1992) Interdependency of the binding subsites in subtilisin. Biochemistry 31: 8967 ± 8971
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz