FEMS Microbiology Letters 12 (1980) 365-367 Published by Elsevier Biomedical Press 365 Electrostatic interaction chromatography, a method for assaying the relative surface charges of bacteria Karsten Pedersen Department of Marine Microbiology, Botanical Institute, Universi O, of GOteborg, Carl Skottsbergs Gata 22, S-413 19 G6teborg, Sueden Received 6 August 198 I Accepted 18 August 1981 1. INTRODUCTION Electrostatic and hydrophobic forces are often pointed out as important factors involved in microbial interactions at interfaces [11. The hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) described by Hjert~n et al. [21 has been used by Dahlb~ick et al. [3] to assay the relative hydrophobicity of marine bacteria. The net surface charge of bacteria can be determined by measuring their electrophoretic mobility [4], but that is a rather laborious method compared to the ESIC method described in the present paper. Bacteria can be looked upon as macro-ions and the adsorption of bacteria to ion exchange resins have been studied by several authors and the results reviewed by Daniels [5]. Ion exchange resins are either positively or negatively charged polymeric lattices in association with small dissociable counter ions. The bacterial affinity for the ion exchanges in electrostatic interaction chromatography (ESIC) is dependent on the surface charges of the assayed bacteria. Investigators primarily interested in the relative values of the surface charges, have a time-saving advantage in using ESIC instead of particle electrophoresis. 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 25 isolates of marine bacteria, sampled and assayed for their relative hydrophobicity by Dahlb~ick et al. [3], were characterized with respect to relative surface charges by means of ESIC. The nine salt solution (NSS) used in ESIC consists of NaC1 23.48g; Na2SO4 1.96g; NaHCO 3 0.10g; KC1 0.33g; KBr 0.05g; MgC12.2H20 2.49g; CaC12 • 2 H20 0.55 g; SrCI 2 • 6 H 2 0 0.01 g; H3BO3 0.01 g; double distilled water 1000 ml, pH 8.2. In the electrostatic interaction chromatography Pasteur pipettes (diam. 5 mm) were plugged with glass wool and washed with ethanol and a 75% NSS. 1 g of the anion exchange resin Dowex 1 × 8, or 1 g of the cation exchange resin Dowex 50W × 8, both of analytical grade and a mesh-size of 100/200 (80-150 #m) (Serva, Heidelberg), was suspended in 1 ml of 75% NSS and packed in the Pasteur pipettes. The procedure was thereafter as described by Dahlb~ick et al. [3] for HIC, applying 1-ml portions of a 75% NSS containing about 109 metabolically 3H-labeled and washed cells to the resin and the gel columns, and eluting with 4 X 3 ml 75% NSS. The affinity of the bacteria for the ion exchange resins, or for the hydrophobic Octyl Sepharose C1-4B gel (Pharmacia, Uppsala), is expressed as the ratio between the radioactivity of the resin fraction and the corresponding eluate (r/e), or the gel fraction and the corresponding eluate (g/e). Increasing r / e values indicate an increasing amount of surface charges of the bacteria assayed. Increasing g / e values indicate an increasing degree of bacterial surface hydrophobicity. Repeated 0378- t097/81/0000-0000/$02.75 g~' 1981 Federation of European Microbiological Societies 366 assays showed good agreement in the r / e and g / e values. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION When performing studies of bacterial adsorption to ion exchange resins as in ESIC, several factors that can affect the adsorption have to be considered: (a) The size of the resin particles must be large enough to avoid a filtration effect. The low r / e and g / e values of the isolates B12 and B18 (Table 1) reveal that the filtration effect in ESIC is negligible with the mesh-size used. (b) The pH and ionic strength [6] have to be kept at defined values. (c) The packing of the Pasteur pipettes, the elution rate, and the handling of the Table I r / e and g / e values for 25 isolates of marine bacteria The isolates have been grouped according to increasing affinity for the anion exchange resin. Isolate Anion exchange resin r / e values Cation exchange resin r / e values Octyl sepharose g / e values B 12 B 18 B 32 B 19 B 31 B 133 B 16 B 34 B 35 B 55 Y 84 B 102 B 96 Y 125 Y 57 B 123 Y 55 Y 66 B 112 B 1 B 1I 1 Y 77 B 104 B 86 Y 59 0.02 0.03 0.23 0.34 0.35 0.50 0.68 1.87 2.15 6.27 10.3 10.6 12.8 12.9 16.7 17.9 41.0 41.5 43.5 53.1 59. I 65.0 83.7 132 205 0.06 0.07 0.18 0.24 3.54 0.62 6.00 0.86 0.35 1.51 0.47 4.80 1.21 0.22 0.82 0,39 0,22 0.15 0.72 0.32 0,05 1.06 0.26 0.16 0.11 0.01 0.03 0.52 1.04 1.32 2.36 1.60 4.44 2.16 7.94 14.2 45.9 39.0 0.81 3.70 71.3 2.68 0.68 2,16 0.34 0.94 0.26 1.36 1.44 0.68 isolates have to be standardized. (d) The exchange capacity of the resins must be sufficiently large. It is limited by the total surface area of the resin particles. If a monolayer of cells is adsorbed to the surface of a 100/200 mesh resin, the theoretical number of bacteria that can be adsorbed approaches 10 l° cells/g resin. This capacity figure has been calculated and experimentally verified by Daniels and Kempe [7]. In the present work 109 cells/g resin have been used, ensuring a load well below the capacity limit. Neihof and Loeb [8], using particle electrophoresis, have shown that particulate matter in sea water has a net negative surface charge. This is true also for marine bacteria as shown by the present ESIC results were all anion r / e values, whether high or low, corresponded to low cation r / e values (Table 1), thus indicating that the isolated bacteria had net surface charges ranging from about zero to strongly negative. The higher the charge of the bacteria surface, the less the possibility of detecting a hydrophobic property, if present. This might explain why none of the isolated bacteria exhibited a high net negative surface charge together with a high degree of hydrophobicity (Table 1). Hydrophilic bacteria possessing hydrophobic sites on the cell surface, as those observed by Marshall and Cruickshank [9], may, if the hydrophilic parts are negatively charged, adsorb both to the hydrophobic gel and to the anion exchange resin as was the case with the isolates Y84, B102, B96, and B123 (Table 1). The isolates B12 and B18 did not adsorb to any of the resins nor to the gel indicating that they were hydrophilic and uncharged. By means of ESIC and HIC methods it is possible to assay a combination of two of the surface properties which enables bacteria to interact at most interfaces. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by the Swedish National Board of Energy Source Development grants 5565 061. I would like to thank Mr. Anders M~rtensson for excellent technical assistance and Prof. Birgitta Norkrans for valuable discussions. 367 REFERENCES [l] Marshall, K.C. (1976) Interfaces in Microbial Ecology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. [2] Hjert+n, S., Rosengren, J. and P~man, S. (1974) J. Chromatogr. 101,281-288. [3] Dahlb~ck, B., Hermansson, M., Kjelleberg, S. and Norktans, B. (1981) Arch. Microbiol. 128, 267-270. [4] Shaw, D.J. (1969) Electrophoresis. Academic Press, London. [5] Daniels, S.L. (1971) Proceedings of the 28th General Meeting of the Society for Industrial Microbiology, Fort Collins, CO, August 29-September4: Developments in Industrial [6] [7] [8] [9] Microbiology, Vol. 13, pp. 211-253. American Institute of Biological Sciences, Washington, DC. Wood, J.M. (1980) in Microbial Adhesion to Surfaces (Berkeley, R.C.W., Lynch, J.M., Melling, J., Rutter, P.R. and Vincent, B., Eds.), pp. 163-185, Ellis Horwoqd, Chicbester. Daniels, S.L. and Kempe, L.L. (1966) Chem Eng. Progr. Symp. Ser. 62, 142-148. Neihof, R.A. and Loeb, G.I. (1972) Limnol. Oceanogr. 17, 7-16. Marshall, K.C. and Cruickshank, R.H. (1973) Arch. Microbiol. 91, 29-40.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz