EGYPTIAN ARCHAEOLOGY Significant composite statue fragments from Amarna Recent discoveries and identifications have contributed to our knowledge of the distinctive composite statuary of Akhenaten’s reign. Kristin Thompson describes two significant unpublished pieces of composite statues which deserve to be more widely known. Most pieces of Amarna composite statuary representing heads, limbs and torsos are made of quartzite; some have surviving tenons which would have been inserted into mortises in garments and bases, secured with gypsum. Specialists have long assumed that the garments of Amarna composite statues were made from a contrasting material, and it is most likely that this would have been a light-coloured limestone, though the possibility has to be entertained that the garments consisted of some other substance such as wood or gypsum. Numerous limestone fragments from Amarna representing garments exist in museums and magazines, but until recently no surviving portions of mortises on such pieces had been identified. In 2010 a right shoulder in fine white limestone (UC108), on display in the Petrie Museum at University College London, was found to contain the remains of a mortise. The sleeve was discovered by Petrie in his 1891-92 season of excavation at Amarna but with no specific provenance recorded. Beautifully carved with narrow pleats and the edge of what was probably a broad collar of beads, the shoulder is roughly life-size (height 8cm, width 9.6cm, depth UC108. This sleeve, made from fine white limestone, came from a dress that was part of a composite statue 6cm; the widest pleat is 1cm). The front of the shoulder contains a pair of vertical cartouches with the late name of the Aten (total width 2.5cm) and the grooves retain traces of blue frit. The presence of the late name is not surprising, since composite statuary seems to have been introduced toward the end of Akhenaten’s reign. The mortise has a rounded profile and perhaps about a fifth of the original opening survives. Its surface has been shaped to a slightly rough texture by pecking with a small, pointed stone tool. Given that the sleeve has been broken off at the bottom, there is no way to determine how deep the mortise was. The second fragment is a segment of a stomach (Amarna registration number S-5995), almost certainly from a statue of Akhenaten. The material is brownish-purple quartzite and it is roughly life-size; height 19.3cm, width 16.3cm, depth 18.5cm; finished surface of stomach, 17cm x 9cm. It was discovered in 1989 during the excavation of the Kom el-Nana temple, now almost certainly identified as the Sunshade of Ra of Nefertiti (see EA 33, pp.5-7). The find-spot was in grid square AB21, roughly the centre UC108. The scooped-out area on the underside of the sleeve is part of a mortise that originally would have had the tenon of an arm, probably made of quartzite, fastened into it 32 EGYPTIAN ARCHAEOLOGY S-5995. A front view of Akhenaten’s stomach, from a composite statue that stood in the Kom el-Nana temple The stomach’s right profile, showing the massive tenon that would have rested inside a kilt, probably, like the sleeve, made of light-coloured limestone of the collection of rooms on the Central Platform, to the east of the hall with two rows of columns (see EA 1, pp.20-21 for a photograph and reconstruction drawing). The stomach was the only piece of statuary found in the Central Platform, while fragments of several statues of Nefertiti, Akhenaten, and the princesses were found in the North and South Shrines; these included a few pieces from composite statues. The area around the shrines also yielded a surface find, a purple-quartzite foot with a deposit of gypsum on its tenon (see EA 36, pp.38-39). The stomach fragment is notable both as the largest known piece of a composite statue and as the only known portion of a torso from such a statue. It consists of a smooth vertical segment of Akhenaten’s stomach, including a very deep horizontal navel. The edges are all broken away. Beneath it is a large tenon, designed to be set down into a mortise in one or more pieces forming a kilt. Presumably below the kilt there would have been legs and feet of the same quartzite; tenons on the undersides of the feet would have fitted into a base made of a different stone. The stomach surface represents a relatively small portion of the piece. The tenon is deep and square, as the profile and bottom views show. Apart from some large chips off the lower right edge, it is well preserved. As the right profile view shows, the tenon is not just a thin column extending down from the middle of the stomach. Rather, it extends far to the rear, and it seems probable that the flat back of the tenon continued up along the back of the torso.This flat rear surface suggests that Amarna composite statues were not finished at the back. There would have had to be some means of supporting the statue, given the lack of a back pillar. The most likely explanation is that the statues were slightly flattened at the back and attached along the torso and garment to depressions in a back panel extending up from the base. This panel would have needed to reach only up to shoulder level. These recent discoveries have expanded the corpus of known composite pieces and revealed how they were assembled. Limestone was used for garments which had mortises firmly fixed with gypsum plaster into tenons on the body-pieces. Royal crowns were probably made of faience, while the princesses had granodiorite sidelocks of youth. Frit or paste added to the body cartouches and broad necklaces completed the colourful and realistic effect created by these innovative statues. q Kristin Thompson is a member of the Amarna Project at Tell elAmarna, registering stone statuary and relief fragments. The front and profile photographs of the stomach are by Barry Kemp, the others by the author. UC108 © The Petrie Museum of Egyptian Archaeology, UCL. Thanks to Stephen Quirke and the staff of the Petrie Museum for their help in the examination of this piece. S-5995. A view of the tenon’s base, showing its square shape 33
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz