CAFF Strategy Series Report
September 2015
The Alaska-Yukon Region of the
Circumboreal Vegetation Map (CBVM)
ARCTIC COUNCIL
Acknowledgements
CAFF Designated Agencies:
•
Norwegian Environment Agency, Trondheim, Norway
•
Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada
•
Faroese Museum of Natural History, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands (Kingdom of Denmark)
•
Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland
•
Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Reykjavik, Iceland
•
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Greenland
•
Russian Federation Ministry of Natural Resources, Moscow, Russia
•
Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden
•
United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska
CAFF Permanent Participant Organizations:
•
Aleut International Association (AIA)
•
Arctic Athabaskan Council (AAC)
•
Gwich’in Council International (GCI)
•
Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC)
•
Russian Indigenous Peoples of the North (RAIPON)
•
Saami Council
This publication should be cited as: Jorgensen, T. and D. Meidinger. 2015. The Alaska Yukon Region of the Circumboreal
Vegetation map (CBVM). CAFF Strategies Series Report. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna, Akureyri, Iceland. ISBN: 9789935-431-48-6
Cover photo: Photo: George Spade/Shutterstock.com
Back cover: Photo: Doug Lemke/Shutterstock.com
Design and layout: Courtney Price
For more information please contact:
CAFF International Secretariat
Borgir, Nordurslod
600 Akureyri, Iceland
Phone: +354 462-3350
Fax: +354 462-3390
Email: [email protected]
Internet: www.caff.is
CAFF Designated Area
Table of Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 5
Methods
...................................................................................................................................... 7
Data Compilation .......................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Bioclimates....................................................................................................................................................................................... 8
Provinces and Geographic Sectors.......................................................................................................................................... 8
Vegetation Classification and Mapping................................................................................................................................ 8
Results
....................................................................................................................................10
Bioclimates.....................................................................................................................................................................................10
Provinces and Geographic Sectors........................................................................................................................................14
Vegetation Classification and Mapping..............................................................................................................................17
Map Unit Descriptions...............................................................................................................................................................17
Mapping .....................................................................................................................................................................................24
Summary and Conclusions...............................................................................................................31
References ....................................................................................................................................32
Appendix of Mapping Attributes....................................................................................................36
Figures
Figure 1. Maps of mean annual temperatures (top) and precipitation (bottom)...........................................................11
Figure 2. Maps of continentality (top) and growing degree days (bottom). Fire history (gray polygons) is
superimposed on continentality....................................................................................................................................12
Figure 3. Bioclimatic zonation based on continentality and growing degree days.......................................................13
Figure 4. Geographic sectors used to help differentiate floristic patterns within the Alaska-Yukon and Aleutian
Provinces. State, province, and territory boundaries in gray, NWBLCC boundary in dark blue. .............15
Figure 5. Photographs of alpine and subalpine classes (photos by M. Fleming and Meidinger,).............................17
Figure 6. Photographs of mesic forest classes, scrub, and heath-meadow classes (photos by M. Fleming,
Meidinger, and J. Pearson)................................................................................................................................................18
Figure 7. Photographs of wet and dry forest, mires, floodplains, and coastal classes (photos by M. Fleming and
Jorgenson)..............................................................................................................................................................................19
Figure 8 Map of vegetation formations (level 1) in the Alaska-Yukon region................................................................25
Figure 9. Map vegetation geographic variants (level 2) in the Alaska-Yukon and Aleutian boreal provinces.....26
Figure 10 Map of vegetation geographic variants (level 2) within the boundaries of the Northwest Boreal
Landscape Conservation Cooperative.........................................................................................................................28
Figure 11. Portion of the CBVM map overlain on the NLCD land cover map of Alaska, illustrating the
correspondence between the two disparate vegetation mapping approaches..........................................30
4
Tables
Table 1. List of data inputs used in mapping.................................................................................................................................. 7
Table 2. Continentality (Ic) and thermotype (based on growing degree days, GDD) classes....................................... 8
Table 3. Areal extent (km2, Albers Alaska projection) of vegetation formations and geographic variants by boreal
province...................................................................................................................................................................................27
Table 4. Areal extent (km2, Albers Alaska projection) of vegetation geographic variants within the boundaries of
the Northwest Boreal Landscape Conservation Cooperative. Areas outside of the CBVM boreal region
are listed as undifferentiated at the bottom of the table......................................................................................29
Acknowledgements
This effort benefitted from the CBVM team leadership of Stephen Talbot and Bill Meades. Skip Walker and Martha
Raynolds provided guidance gained from experience with the CAVM project. David Selkowitz and Carl Markon
provided MODIS base map products. Teresa Hollingsworth provided insight on classification of boreal ecosystems.
Josephine Clark assisted with GIS data compilation and mapping. The Canadian CBVM team, including JeanPierre Saucier, Andre Robitaille, Will MacKenzie, Ken Baldwin, and Peter Uhlig provided ideas on how to map the
Canadian Boreal. This project was initially funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, with additional funding from
the USFWS and Yukon Parks through the Northwest Boreal Landscape Conservation Cooperative thanks to efforts
by Stephen Talbot, Carl Markon, John DeLapp and Eric Schroff. The CAFF Secretariat, through efforts by Tom Barry
and Olga Pálsdottir, administered the contract for the follow-on funding.
5
Introduction
The circumboreal vegetation mapping (CBVM) project is an international collaboration among vegetation
scientists to create a new vegetation map of the boreal region at a 1:7.5 million scale with a common legend and
mapping protocol (Talbot and Meades 2011). The map is intended to portray potential natural vegetation, or the
vegetation that would exist in the absence of human or natural disturbance, rather than existing vegetation that
is commonly generated at larger scales. This report and map contributes to the CBVM effort by developing maps
of bioclimatic zones, geographic sectors with similar floristic variability, and vegetation in boreal Alaska, Yukon,
northwestern British Columbia, and a mountainous portion of southwest Northwest Territories—termed the
Alaska-Yukon region. It further develops the mapping from the initial classification and proto-type mapping efforts
for southwestern Alaska (Jorgenson 2012) and western Canada (Meidinger and MacKenzie 2012) to this broader
area.
Bioclimatic zonation provides a strong basis for determining the distribution of zonal ecosystems (Pojar et al.
1987, Meidinger and Pojar 1991). The CBVM project utilizes the approach of Sánchez-Mata and Rivas-Martínez
(2011) that differentiates zones based on temperature and precipitation indices. Based on computerized mapping
of world-wide climate data, they divided boreal northwestern North America into four bioclimatic zones: xeric
(Yukon Flats region), continental (central Alaska and Yukon), subcontinental (southwestern Alaska), and oceanic
(southwestern Alaska, Aleutians, and portion of southeast Alaska panhandle). In our effort, bioclimatic mapping
was based on the higher-resolution regional gridded climatic data of Parameter Regression of Independent Slopes
Model (Prism Climate Group 2008, Hamann et al. 2013) and, thus, differs somewhat from the maps by SánchezMata and Rivas-Martínez (2010).
Floristic and biogeographic regions within our map area have been differentiated through numerous approaches.
Uvardy (1975) divided the region into five biogeographical provinces: Alaskan Tundra (northern and western
Alaska), Yukon Taiga (Interior Alaska and Yukon), Aleutian Islands (southwestern Alaska and Aleutians), Sitkan
(southeastern Alaska), and Rocky Mountain (northern BC). Bailey (1996) divided the AY region into four zones:
Subarctic Division and Subarctic Regime Mountains (interior and western Alaska), Marine Division and Marine
Regime Mountains (Alaska Range, southwestern Alaska, southeast Alaska panhandle). From a broader global
perspective, Takhtajan (1986) differentiated only three provinces, Arctic (northern Alaska and Canada, and
Aleutians), Canadian (boreal), and Vancouverian (coastal rainforests). These approaches differ in how they deal
with the major climatic and physiographic transition zones across the region.
Vegetation classification and mapping efforts for the Alaska-Yukon region have used numerous approaches
based on plant structure and species composition. For Alaska, the Alaska Vegetation Classification (Viereck et al.
1992) is the main statewide system and uses a five-level hierarchical approach that partitions both vegetation
structure and composition. The floristic classification of boreal vegetation of North America by Rivas-Martinez
and Sánchez-Mata (2011) provides a good framework for a comprehensive classification, yet lacks sufficient
Alaskan plots to provide a comprehensive classification for Alaska. There have been numerous statewide efforts
to map vegetation across Alaska, but they have primarily been oriented toward vegetation structure (Talbot
2008). Spetzman (1963) mapped the vegetation of Alaska at 1:5 M scale using a simple scheme of nine classes that
included climatic regions, physiography, and vegetation structure that helped differentiate species composition.
It formed the basis for vegetation maps of Alaska by Viereck and Little (1972) and the Joint Federal-State Land Use
Planning Commission for Alaska (1973). Statewide maps also have been developed using spectral classification
of satellite imagery using simplified (Fleming 1997, Selkowitz and Stehman 2011) and complex (Landfire 2011)
classifications of land cover characteristics. Two statewide ecoregional maps have been developed (Gallant
et al. 1995, Nowacki et al. 2002), but vary in how they emphasized the influence of topography and climate
on vegetation characteristics. The small-scale vegetation maps for Arctic Alaska (Raynolds et al. 2006) and the
circumarctic (Walker et al. 2002) combined bioclimatic regions and vegetation structure in a hierarchical approach
that emphasized differentiation of floristic composition. Given the lack of statewide vegetation databases and a
floristic classification, we relied on numerous regional classification and mapping efforts and these are references
in the map unit descriptions.
Canada has a history of ecological mapping that combines vegetation, climate and physiography into map units
at various scales at both the federal and provincial level. At the federal level, the Ecosystem Land Classification
(ELC), or the National Ecological Framework (NEF) (Ecological Stratification Working Group 1995), provided
a framework for dividing the country into a hierarchy of physiographic and climatic areas, while Ecoclimatic
Regions of Canada (Ecoregions Working Group 1989) provided broad-scale mapping following a zonal ecosystem
6
approach. For northwestern Canada, Oswald and Senyk (1977) completed the first map of the Ecoregions of
the Yukon. Subsequent ecoregion mapping (Smith et al. 2004) contributed to the 1995 NEF. Recent mapping in
Yukon has updated the ecoregion mapping of 1995 (Ecological and Landscape Classification Technical Working
Group 2014). In addition, a map of bioclimate zones has been completed for Yukon (Ecological and Landscape
Classification Technical Working Group 2015) following the mapping principles of Flynn and Francis (2012) (see
also Environment Yukon 2015b). The Northwest Territories conducted further ecoregion mapping following from
the NEF (Downing et al. 2006) that led to the mapping of ecoregions within the framework of Ecological Regions of
North America (Commission for Environmental Cooperation 1997). The map of the cordilleran region (Ecosystem
Classification Group 2010) of this territory is included in the Alaska-Yukon CBVM. For British Columbia, there is both
an ecoregion map (Demarchi et al. 1990, Demarchi 2011) and biogeoclimatic map (Version 9, https://www.for.gov.
bc.ca/hre/becweb/resources/maps/CartographicProducts.html) based on a zonal ecosystem approach (Meidinger
and Pojar 1991). These mapping approaches differ in that ecoregions are broad areas of uniform physiography
and climate (elevational vegetation zones are not formally mapped), while biogeoclimate zones differentiate
vegetation-ecological zones using the concept of zonal ecosystem.
This study was initially supported by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to cover boreal Alaska and was
subsequently expanded to cover the area encompassed by the Northwest Boreal Landscape Conservation
Cooperative through FWS funds to the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna program. Specific objectives of the
study were to:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
compile localized vegetation classifications and maps to aid in development of a region-wide
classification;
compile existing ancillary thematic and remote sensing products to form the inputs for mapping;
develop bioclimatic zones and geographic sectors to better partition the variability in floristic
characteristics;
produce a vegetation map consistent with the CBVM protocols, and
modify the map to complete the area within the Northwest Boreal LCC. The mapping approach is similar
to that used for the map of the natural vegetation of Europe (Bohn et al. 2000).
Photo: Tomas Serada/Shutterstock.com
7
Methods
Data Compilation
Data compilation included both regional vegetation classification and mapping information to support the
descriptions of region wide vegetation and thematic maps and remote sensing products that formed the basis
for the mapping. Vegetation and mapping reports and publications for Alaska included studies by Hulten (1937),
Drury (1956), Johnson and Vogel (1966), Wibbenmeyer et al.(1982), Rosenberg (1986), Talbot and Markon (1986,
1988), Viereck et al. (1983, 1986, 1992, 1993), Foote (1983), Jorgenson et al. (1984, 1999, 2003, 2008, 2009, 2010),
Jorgenson and Heiner (2003), Talbot et al. (2010), Wells et al. (2013). Studies for Yukon and northern British
Columbia included Douglas (1974), Orloci and Staneck (1979), Wiken et al. (1981), Lausi and Nimis (1985), Pojar
et al. (1987), Ovenden and Brassard (1988), DeLong et al. (2011), Demarchi (2011), Ecological and Landscape
Classification Technical Working Group 2015 and Environment Yukon (2015b).
To support the integrated-terrain-unit mapping approach for the CBVM project we compiled satellite images and
map data on climate, topography, geology, and fire history (Table 1). The basis of the mapping was mosaicked
MODIS images that were projected for our regional mapping. Numerous climatic indices based on the PRISM
climate data were already developed by Hamann et al. (2013).
Table 1. List of data inputs used in mapping.
Map Product
Source
MODIS Imagery (USGS)
NASA MODIS image mosaic produced by Canadian Center for Remote Sensing, reprojected
by U.S. Geological Survey (Selkowicz 2012).
Lands GeoCover
NASA Geocover Landsat Mosaic 2000 from Global Land Cover Facility. http://glcf.umd.edu/
data/mosaic/
Land Cover
Alaska statewide Landcover (Selkowitz and Stehman 2011) and Canada land cover map
(CCRS 1999).
Digital Elevation Model
Worldwide DEM data, 15-arc second resolution http://www.viewfinderpanoramas.org/
dem3.html
Surficial Geology
Surficial geology of Alaska (Karlstrom 1964). Surficial geology of Canada (Fulton 1995)
Bedrock Geology
Bedrock geology of Alaska (Beikman 1980). Bedrock geology of Canada (Douglas 1969).
Glaciation Limits
Alaska PaleoGlacier Atlas: http://instaar.colorado.edu/groups/QGISL/ak_paleoglacier_atlas/
Mean Annual Temperature
PRISM gridded climate data for western North America (Hamann et al. 2013). http://
adaptwest.databasin.org/pages/adaptwest-climatewna
Mean Annual Precip.
See above.
Growing Deg. Days
See above.
Continentality
See above.
Bioclimate
Derived from continentality and growing degree days.
Fire History
Alaska Interagency Coordination Center (http://afsmaps.blm.gov/ imf/imf.
jsp?site=firehistory), and Canadian Wildland Fire Information System (http://cwfis.cfs.nrcan.
gc.ca/datamart)
Treeline
Manually interpreted from Landsat Geocover
Physiography
Manually interpreted from MODIS imagery and Landsat Geocover
A new treeline map was developed to better define the northern limits of boreal vegetation. While there was
an existing circumpolar treeline (Walker et al. 2002) it was inconsistent with modern imagery and needed
improvement. For our purposes, we used the physiognomic (biologic) forest line definition of Tuhkanen (1993)
for the limit of continuous forest. For the new treeline, we used the Landsat Geocover mosaic (Table 1) to
manually interpret the boundaries of nearly contiguous forest patches along the margins of the boreal zone. As
implemented, this is more appropriately a forest boundary evident on moderate-resolution imagery, rather than
the traditional concept of treeline that includes lower density individual trees at the limits of tree reproduction.
After manual image interpretation of the Geocover Landsat mosaic, it was compared to the distribution of
broadleaf and coniferous forest classes on the statewide NLCD land cover map (Selkowitz and Stehman 2011) and
revised where needed.
8
Bioclimates
Bioclimatic zonation of Alaska followed the approach of Rivas-Martinez and Sánchez-Mata (2011) based on
temperature and precipitation indices. We used indices, primarily mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual
precipitation (MAP), growing degree days (GDD, base 5 °C), and continentality, calculated from higher-resolution
regional gridded PRISM climatic data (Hamann et al. 2013) and available online (Table 1). In addition, we included
fire history as an indicator of climate-induced disturbance. While the classification was based on the system by
Rivas-Martinez and Sánchez-Mata (2011), cutpoints were adapted to the available PRISM-based indices, and
to better differentiate ecological zonation in transitional areas. We used growing degree days, instead of the ‘It’
warmth index, because it was available and is widely used in forest ecology. We also modified the terminology
for thermotypes (based on growing degree days) to use terminology more readily understandable to a broader
audience (e.g., warm vs thermo, cold vs supra) and to avoid terms related to topography (e.g., oroboreal).
Table 2. Continentality (Ic) and thermotype (based on growing degree days, GDD) classes.
Continentality
Ic
Thermotype
GDD (base 5 °C)
Hyperoceanic (H)
<11
Cryic
100-300
Oceanic (O)
11-21
Frigid
300-700
Subcontinental (S)
21-28
Cold
700-920
Continental (C)
28-46
Cool
920-1200
Hypercontinental (Y)
>46
Warm
>1200
The bioclimate indices were used at several stages. First, they were used to help identify the boundaries of the
provinces and sectors. Second, during mapping the bioclimate maps were frequently used to review polygon
boundaries, especially in mountainous areas. Third, after the initial map was completed, the mean values of
selected bioclimate indices (Continentality, GDD, MAT) were calculated and assigned to each polygon. These
values were then referred to when assigning the vegetation codes to each polygon.
Provinces and Geographic Sectors
To establish the boundaries of the Alaska-Yukon and Aleutian provinces that formed our mapping domain, we:
(1) developed a new treeline to define the western and northern boundaries of the province (described above);
(2) compiled existing studies of floristic and biogeographic zonation; (3) compiled data on the distribution of
abundant and endemic plant species that helped identify the species characteristic of the region; and (4) used
the bioclimate indices to help resolve boundaries. Compilation of existing biogeographic zonation included:
biogeographical provinces from Udvardy (1975), biotic provinces of North America (Dice 1943), forest regions of
Canada (Rowe 1972), floristic regions of the world (Takhtajan 1986), floristic regions of Alaska (Murray and Lipkin
1987), ecoregions of Canada (Wiken et al. 1993), ecoregions of the world (Bailey 1996), biotic communities of North
America (Brown 1998), terrestrial ecoregions of North America (Ricketts 1997), floristic plant geography of North
America (McLaughlin 2007), and Alaska biomes (Simpson et al. 2007).
Geographic sectors were differentiated by both bioclimatic zonation and regional distribution of characteristic
species. The geographic sectors primarily reflect the bioclimates of low elevations. For plant distributions, we relied
on distribution maps in Hulten (1968), Cody (1996), E-Flora BC (http://ibis.geog.ubc.ca/biodiversity/eflora/) and
digital range maps of North American trees (Little 1971).
Vegetation Classification and Mapping
Vegetation was classified and mapped at two hierarchical levels: (1) formations that differentiated zonal,
extrazonal, and azonal systems; and (2) geographic sectors (variants) based on dominant species that reflect
broad longitudinal zonation. Bioclimatic data were included as mapping attributes and were used at both the
formation (elevational zonation, e.g., alpine) and geographic variants (regional zonation, e.g., northern). The
CBVM hierarchical system includes a Level 3 for differentiating plant communities, but this level was not mapped
at this small scale. This reduction to a two-level system was adopted at the 2014 Helsinki CBVM Workshop to: (1)
reduce the complexity of the mapping from the original five-level mapping system (formation type, formation
group, formation, bioclimatic subdivision, and geographic variants (Talbot and Meades 2011); (2) simplify legend
9
description and map coding; and (3) be more consistent with the map on the natural vegetation of Europe (Bohn
et al. 2000), which has two main levels and additional subdivisions for some classes. For describing vegetation
classes, plant communities/associations were compiled from the literature and simply grouped within the
structural and environmental classification at the Formation Level 1 without attempting to do a comprehensive
numerical analysis of plant communities. At our mapping scale, the classification of zonal vegetation is roughly
equivalent to the alliance level of vegetation classification (Vegetation Subcommittee 2008, Faber-Langendoen et
al. 2014). For taxonomic nomenclature we use the Flora of North America and USDA Plants Database.
Mapping used an integrated-terrain-unit approach that involved ten steps. First, existing land cover maps and
ground-reference data were obtained from the literature and land management agencies. Second, relationships
among vegetation and terrain characteristics were obtained from the literature as a guide for interpreting
satellite imagery. Third, ancillary statewide/provincial/territory map data were compiled, including topography
(DEM), bedrock geology, surficial geology, land cover, and climatic maps for mean annual air temperature and
precipitation (Table 1). Fourth, boreal vegetation was delineated over the MODIS satellite imagery (250-m
resolution) through manual image interpretation and digitizing of vector boundaries. Fifth, each polygon was
attributed using an integrated-terrain-unit approach that included classifications for bioclimate, physiography,
generalized geology, permafrost, disturbance, growth form, geographic sector, water %, and vegetation formation
at Level 1. Sixth, the boundaries were reviewed over the ancillary data and higher-resolution Geocover mosaic
and revised if needed. Seventh, Level 2 geographic variants were coded by sorting and integrating bioclimate,
geographic sector, and formation characteristics. Eighth, a consistency review was done by cross-tabulating
attributes and overall review of the coded Level 2 classes with maps of topography, climate, and MODIS imagery.
Ninth, polygon sizes were evaluated for consistency with map specifications and undersized polygons (with
exceptions for coastal islands and prominent small features such as large volcanoes along the Aleutian islands)
were aggregated with adjacent polygons. Tenth, thematic maps were developed for bioclimate, geographic sector,
physiography, and vegetation class to illustrate products derived using the integrated-terrain-unit mapping
approach.
Photo: George Burba/Shutterstock.com
10
Photo: Pi_Lens/Shutterstock.com
Results
Bioclimates
Bioclimatic zones were developed using PRISM climate data for the Alaska-Yukon study area (Figures 1 and
2). The primary indices included mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual precipication (MAP), mean
July temperature, growing degree days (GDD, base 5 °C), and continentality. The climatic indices, primarily
continentality and GDD, were used to develop 12 bioclimatic zones with the study region (Figure 3).
The climatic gradient across the region extends from the hypercontinental continentality and cool summers of
the Yukon Flats to the hyperoceanic continentality and cold summers of the Aleutians. The bioclimates also show
a large topographic gradient, so that within any one region summer temperatures (GDD) can range from cool
in the lowlands to frigid at high elevations in the mountains, with the highest mountains having a cryic (nearly
continuously frozen) temperature regime.
Fire frequency, which provides an indirect indicator of climatic conditions and is important to successional
dynamics, showed large differences across the study area. Fires have been frequent and widespread in areas with
continental-cool bioclimate, infrequent and less extensive in areas with subcontinental-cool and continental-cold
bioclimates, and absent in areas with oceanic-cold bioclimate. Due to the high-frequency of fires in areas with
a continental-cool bioclimate, we classified the vegetation in these areas as having mixed coniferous-broadleaf
forests on mesic sites because the high-frequency of disturbance prevents late successional forests without a
broadleaf component from becoming dominant.
11
Figure 1. Maps of mean annual temperatures (top) and precipitation (bottom).
12
Figure 2. Maps of continentality (top) and growing degree days (bottom). Fire history (gray polygons) is superimposed on
continentality.
Figure 3. Bioclimatic zonation based on continentality and growing degree days.
13
14
Provinces and Geographic Sectors
The study area, the Alaska-Yukon region of northwestern North America, was divided into two biogeographic
provinces, the Alaska-Yukon and Aleutian biogeographic provinces, based on bioclimatic and floristic differences.
The extent, dominant bioclimates, characteristic plant species, and problematic issues for defining the provinces
are discussed below.
The Alaska-Yukon Province encompasses the central and northern portions of boreal Alaska, most of the Yukon
Territory, a portion of adjacent Northwest Territories, and the northwestern boreal region of British Columbia. It
is bounded on the north and west by treeline. On the south it extends to the Sitka spruce and hemlock forests
of the hyperoceanic bioclimate of southeastern Alaska and to the more temperate Sub-boreal and Engelmann
spruce forests of British Columbia. In the east it extends to the eastern edge of the Rocky Mountains in B.C. and
the Northwest Territories. The Province has a continental to subcontinental climate and summer temperatures, as
indicated by growing degree days (base 5°C), are sufficient for coniferous and broadleaf tree growth. Characteristic
tree species that dominate the vegetation include White spruce (Picea glauca), Black spruce (Picea mariana),
Tamarack (Larix laricina), Alaska paper birch (Betula neoalaskana), Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides), and
Balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera). The province has roughly 50 endemic species (depending on how isolated
occurrences in adjacent regions are treated) and an additional ~10 subspecies and varieties.
The Aleutian Province includes the Aleutian islands and the southern portion of the Alaska Peninsula. It has an
oceanic climate with cold summer temperatures and high mean annual precipitation. While it has a distinctive
treeless vegetation and bioclimate, its flora is an amalgam of Asia, Arctic, and boreal influences with few endemic
species (Talbot et al. 2010, Garroutte and Ickert-Bond 2013). The Panarctic Flora project (2011) suggested that
an Aleutian-Bering Sea insular region could be justified floristically, but here we excluded the Northern Bering
Sea Islands from the Aleutian Province because of the disparate floristic composition between the island groups
(Garroutte and Ickert-Bond 2013).
Geographic sectors were differentiated within the provinces to reflect differences in bioclimates and vegetation
ranges, with four sectors within the Alaska-Yukon Province and one sector within the Aleutian Province (Figure 4).
The bioclimate and distinguishing biophysical characteristics of each sector are described below.
The Northern Alaska-Yukon sector covers most of the Yukon River basin. It has predominantly continental-frigid
and continental-cold bioclimates; continuous permafrost; and vegetation dominated by coniferous woodlands
with very little broadleaf forests; and Populus tremuloides and Larix laricina are scarce. Fires are frequent, but
vegetation usually recovers to spruce forests during early regeneration. This area was differentiated as having
distinct ecoregions by Nowacki et al. (2002), and is noted for being a broad forest-tundra transition zone (Chapin et
al. 2006).
The Western Alaska sector is similar to the Northern Alaska-Yukon sector but has slightly more subcontinental
climate and permafrost is discontinuous. Vegetation dominated by coniferous woodlands and abundant
shrublands, with very little broadleaf forests, and Populus tremuloides and Larix laricina are uncommon. While
difference with the Northern Alaska-Yukon sector are minor, we kept this area as a separate sector, because it is
transitional and could be useful for future mapping and modeling efforts. This area was differentiated as having
distinct ecoregions by Nowacki et al. (2002), and by Simpson et al. (2007) due to the lack of deciduous forest and
abundance of shrublands.
The Yukon sector mostly has a continental-cool bioclimate with lesser amounts of continental cold and
continental-frigid areas at higher elevations; permafrost is discontinuous with widespread thermokarst; vegetation
is dominated by mixed coniferous-broadleaf forests due to high fire frequency; and Populus tremuloides is a
common component of the forests. This area is similar to the intermontane boreal zone of Nowacki et al. (2002),
the boreal forest of Simpson et al. (2007), and the Boreal Eucontinental Alaskan and the northwestern portions of
the Cassiar subsectors of Rivas-Martinez et al. (1999).
The Southern Alaska sector ranges from the Bristol Bay lowlands and Alaska Peninsula to the Wrangell Mountains.
It has mostly has a subcontinental cool bioclimate, with subcontinental-frigid at higher elevations, permafrost
is mostly sporadic, and glaciers and icefields are widespread. Vegetation dominated by herb-rich mixed forests,
subalpine woodlands, and extensive shrublands near the western forest margins, and it has some of the largest
coastal meadows in the world. Populus trichocarpa and Betula papyrifera var. kenaica trees are common trees,
Figure 4. Geographic sectors used to help differentiate floristic patterns within the Alaska-Yukon and Aleutian Provinces. State, province, and territory boundaries in gray, NWBLCC
boundary in dark blue.
15
16
while Populus tremuloides is uncommon and Larix laricina is absent. It is a transitional area between the continental
and oceanic bioclimates and has been differentiated as Alaska Range Transition and Coastal Mountain Transition
ecoregions by Nowacki et al. (2002). We include the Aklun Mountains, which was part of the CAVM map, because
of the floristic similarity with the rest of this sector. The central flats of the Cooper River Basin is included in this
sector for regional continuity, but vegetation in the area was mapped as part of the Yukon sector because of its
continental bioclimate and prevalence of fires and aspen.
The Liard-Stikine sector encompasses much of the Liard River and upper portions of the Stikine River basin. It has
mostly has a subcontinental cool bioclimate, with subcontinental-frigid at higher elevations; permafrost is mostly
sporadic. Picea glauca forests and woodlands predominate, while Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) dominates in
some areas with extensive fire history and Subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) occurs in some mature forest stands with
increasing in prevalence in upper elevation woodlands. Picea mariana occurs in wetlands but is not common on
uplands. Populus tremuloides stands, sometimes with a (Betula neoalaskana) component, form extensive patches
in localized areas with frequent fire history. Larix laricina is virtually absent. This area is included in the AlaskaYukon Province due to its similarity in floristics and its Cordilleran boreal climate. Demarchi (2011) and Ecological
Stratification Working Group (1996) separate the Cordilleran boreal from the plateau regions to the east, and
Ecological Stratification Working Group (1996) combines the northern British Columbia and southern Yukon
cordilleran boreal into a Boreal Cordilleran Ecozone. This region has a less continental climate than other sectors of
the Alaska-Yukon province, due to a slightly greater influence of maritime air masses.
The Aleutian sector extends from the middle of the Alaska Peninsula to Attu Island at the east end of the Aleutian
Islands in Alaska. The bioclimates are predominately oceanic-cold at low elevations and oceanic-frigid at high
elevations, permafrost occurs only at high elevations, vegetation is dominated by dwarf scrub and meadows, and
trees are absent. The Eastern Aleutians was differentiated from the Western Aleutians (Commander Islands and
westward), because of the more Asiatic influence of the vegetation in the western portion. Our map only covers
the Alaskan portion of the province. The boundary of the sector along the Alaska Peninsula and Kodiak Island
are problematic. Our boundary on the Alaska Peninsula is consistent with the bioclimate zonation, although we
recognize that the region is a transition zone, particularly for alder thickets (Talbot et al. 2005). The western portion
of Kodiak Islands was included in this sector, with the eastern portion of the island excluded from the boreal
because of the presence of Sitka spruce, similar to the differentiation of Viereck and Little (1971).
Our regionalization is most similar to that of Rivas-Martinez and Sanchez-Mata (2011), but a comparison of
our provinces and sectors with other schemes reveals several problematic areas. First, we differentiated the
Aleutians as a boreal province consistent with Rivas-Martinez and Sanchez-Mata (2011) and its exclusion from the
circumarctic vegetation map (Walker et al. 2002). While it has a distinctive vegetation and bioclimate, its flora is an
amalgam of boreal, Arctic, and Asian influences with few endemics (Talbot et al. 2010, Garroutte and Ickert-Bond
2013) that may be insufficient to justify differentiation at the province level. Many studies, however, differentiate
the floristics of the region at the global or continental scale (Dice 1943, Udvardy 1975, Elvebakk et al. 1999).
Second, the Liard-Stikine portion of the AY province transitions into zones with more eastern and temperate flora.
Our map is consistent with the ecological zonation of northern British Columbia by Meidinger and Pojar (1991), the
biotic provinces of Dice (1943), and the Northern Cordillera Boreal Forest of Ricketts (1999), but inconsistent with
the ecoregions map of Canada (Wiken 1993). While we recognize that southeastern Yukon and northern British
Columbia have some species common with eastern and more temperate regions, there also are many species of
Alaska-Yukon distribution and the edge of the Cordillera makes a convenient physiographic boundary. Third, some
members of the CBVM team consider the Sitka spruce-Hemlock forest of coastal Alaska and British Columbia part
of the boreal biome, but there is a long tradition of distinguishing the coastal rainforest as separate (Rowe 1971,
Viereck and Little 1972, Udvardy 1975) because of the large floristic differences. While we note that Rivas-Martinez
et al. (1999) and Rivas-Martínez and Sánchez-Mata (2011) place the northern coastal rainforests within a Boreal
Oceanic Alaskan Province within the North-Western Pacific Subregion, their floristic analysis also recognizes the
large floristic difference by differentiating its vegetation at the highest level (Order Va, Tsugetalia mertensianoheteophyllae).
17
Vegetation Classification and Mapping
Map Unit Descriptions
Within the Alaska-Yukon (AY) and Aleutian Provinces, 12 zonal and 9 azonal geographic variants were
differentiated at Level 2 by combining formations at Level 1 (physiognomic and environmental conditions) with
geographic sectors at Level 2. The zonal types represent the large-scale mature (climax) vegetation response to
regional climatic conditions under mesic soil conditions, whereas, the azonal classes represents vegetation that
is more influenced by edaphic factors than by climate (e.g. wetland, alluvial vegetation, halophytic vegetation).
Below, we discuss their dominant and characteristic species, typical landscape conditions, and reference similar
vegetation classes described by floristic studies or regional mapping efforts. The descriptions are grouped by zonal
and azonal classes, and subsequently ordered by the formation level. Representative photographs are provided in
Figures 5−7.
Figure 5. Photographs of alpine and subalpine classes (photos by M. Fleming and Meidinger,).
18
Figure 6. Photographs of mesic forest classes, scrub, and heath-meadow classes (photos by M. Fleming, Meidinger, and J. Pearson).
19
Figure 7. Photographs of wet and dry forest, mires, floodplains, and coastal classes (photos by M. Fleming and Jorgenson).
20
Zonal Vegetation
Central-Northern Alaska-Yukon Alpine Dwarf Scrub and Meadows is dominated by dwarf and prostrate
shrubs (Betula nana, Dryas octopetala, Salix arctica, Vaccinium uliginosum, V. vitis-idaea, Loiseleuria procumbens,
L. decumbens, Empetrum nigrum, Cassiope tetragona) with graminoids (Hierochloe alpina, Festuca altaica, Carex
nardina, Luzula multiflora), forbs (Oxytropis nigrescens), mosses (Hylocomnium splendens, Racomitrium lanuginosum,
Rhytidium rugosum), and lichens (Flavocetraria spp., Cladina spp., Sterocaulon spp.) on dry sites, interspersed with
herbaceous meadows dominated by sedges (Carex bigelowii, Eriophorum angustifolium, E. vaginatum) and forbs
(Saxifraga spp.) on mesic to wet sites. It has a continental-frigid bioclimate, permafrost is continuous, and occurs
on residual soils, talus, colluvium, and glacial till. The alpine zone is vegetated between ~1000−2000 m and
partially vegetated to barren above 2000 m. The diverse class includes the alpine rocky dry dwarf shrub, alpine
rocky moist low shrub, and alpine wet meadows of Jorgenson et al. (2001), alpine non-carbonate and carbonate
Dryas dwarf shrub classes of Jorgenson and Heiner (2004), and the Dryas integrifolia-Oxytropis nigrescens
association of Pojar and Stewart (1991). This class extends into the more subcontinental bioclimate of the LiardStikine sector.
Southern Alaska-Yukon Alpine Dwarf Scrub and Meadows is dominated by dwarf and prostrate shrubs
(Vaccinium uliginosum, V. vitis-idaea, Cassiope stelleriana, Luetkea pectinata, Phyllodoce aleutica, Empetrum nigrum,
Dryas integrifolia, Salix arctica, S. polaris, Ledum decumbens) with forbs (Oxytropis nigrescens, Sanguisorba stipulata,
Veratrum viride, Aconitum delphiniifolium, Lupinus spp.), graminoids (Hierochloe alpina, Festuca altaica, Luzula
multiflora, Carex microchaeta, C. podocarpa) and lichens (Cladina rangiferina, Thamnolia vermicularis). The class is
similar to the dwarf alpine scrub of Clark and Duffy (2006); the rocky alpine moist low scrub, moist dwarf scrub, and
dry dwarf scrub ecotypes of Jorgenson et al. (2003), and the alpine ecotypes of Wells et al. (2013).
Aleutian Alpine Dwarf Scrub and Meadows is dominated by dwarf and prostrate shrubs (Cassiope
lycopodioides, Vaccinium uliginosum, Empetrum nigrum, Phyllodoce aleutica, Salix arctica, Loiseleuria
procumbens) and meadows (Calamagrostis nutkaensis, Luzula arcuata spp. unalaschcensis) with mosses
(Racomitrium lanuginosum, R. ericoides) and lichens (Thamnolia vermicularis, Cladina arbuscula). This class has
an oceanic-frigid bioclimate, permafrost status is poorly known, and occurs on residual and hillside colluvium at
elevations above 300 m. The class includes the Phyllodoce aleutica heath and Vaccinium uliginosum-Thamnolia
vermicularis fellfield associations described by Talbot et al. (2010).
Yukon Subalpine Spruce Woodlands and Scrub is dominated by woodland to open spruce (mostly Picea glauca,
occasionally P. mariana), interspersed with tall and low shrubs (Salix glauca, S. pulchra, Betula glandulosa, Vaccinium
uliginosum). The understory has dwarf shrubs (Empetrum nigrum, V. vitis-idaea, S. reticulata,), sedges (C. bigelowii),
grasses (Festuca altaica), feathermosses (Hylocomium splendens, Pleurozium schreberi), and lichens. The class occurs
at high elevations (~900−1200 m), and has continental cold to frigid bioclimates, continuous to discontinuous
permafrost, and usually occurs on residual soils and hillside colluvium on upper slopes and shoulders. This class is
similar to the high elevation coniferous woodland and open forests of Jorgenson et al. (1996), treeline black spruce
woodland of Hollingsworth (2004). Scrub vegetation is similar to the Poplar/willow-alder/herbs type of Viereck
(1979).
Southern Alaska Subalpine Spruce Woodlands and Scrub is dominated by white spruce (P. glauca), interspersed
with tall and low shrubs (Alnus viridis ssp. crispa, S. alaxensis, Salix glauca, S. barclayi, Betula nana, Dasiphora
fruticosa). The understory is dominated by dwarf shrubs (Vaccinium vitis-idaea, Empetrum nigrum, Rubus arcticus),
herbs (Chamerion angustifolium, Geranium erianthum, Sanguisorba stipulata, Angelica lucida, Gymnocarpium
dryopteris, Dryopteris dilatata ssp. americana), graminoids (Calamagrostis canadensis, Festuca altaica, Carex
podocarpa), feathermosses (Hylcomium splendens, Pleurozium schreberi), and sphagnum mosses. Deciduous
forest patches (P. balsamifera) occasionally occur on steep, warm, upper slopes. The climate is subcontinental and
permafrost occurs mostly on steep, north-facing slopes. These open forests and woodlands are found on mountain
slopes and high plateaus, mostly between about 900-1200m (occasionally to 1500m) elevation. Glacial till and
hillside colluvium are the main parent materials. This class is similar to: the boreal subalpine spruce woodland
ecotype described by Jorgenson et al. (2008); Interior-dwarf needleleaf permafrost woodlands of the Boreal Low
Mountains subsection of Clark and Duffy (2006), white spruce/resin birch/sphagnum and white spruce-paper
birch/alder/Sphagnum class of Viereck (1979) for southwestern Alaska; and subalpine classes of Wells et al. (2013).
21
Liard-Stikine Subalpine Spruce-Fir Woodlands and Scrub is characterized by open stands of white spruce
(P. glauca) and subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa), interspersed with tall and low shrubs (Salix glauca, Betula nana).
The understory includes dwarf shrubs (Vaccinium vitis-idaea, Empetrum nigrum), graminoids (Festuca altaica) and
feathermosses (Hylcomium splendens). Stands of lodgepole pine can occur on recent burns, on dry sites, or codominating with white spruce and subalpine fir. Deciduous forest patches (Populus tremuloides, P. balsamifera)
are uncommon, occurring only on some very steep, warm slopes. Recent burns can be dominated by willows.
The climate is subcontinental, but with less maritime influence than areas immediately on the lee of the coastal
mountains. Permafrost is mostly restricted to steep, north-facing slopes. These open forests and woodlands are
found on mountain slopes and high plateaus, mostly between about 900-1500m elevation. Glacial till and hillside
colluvium are the main parent materials. This class is equivalent to the Spruce–Willow–Birch zone of Pojar and
Stewart (1991) and similar to the Boreal High of Yukon (Environment Yukon 2015b).
Northern Alaska-Yukon Spruce Woodlands and Scrub has a woodland to open forest canopy of coniferous
trees (mostly Picea glauca, occasionally P. mariana), interspersed with shrublands with tall shrubs (Alnus viridis
ssp. crispa, Salix bebbiana) and low shrubs (Betula nana, Salix pulchra, S. glauca, Vaccinium uliginosum). The
understory commonly has dwarf shrubs (Ledum palustre ssp. decumbens, Empetrum nigrum, V. vitis-idaea),
grasses (Calamagrostis canadensis), sedges (Carex bigelowii), feathermosses (Hylocomium splendens, Pleurozium
schreberi), and lichens (Cladina rangiferina). Deciduous forest patches (Populus balsamifera, Betula neoalaskana) are
uncommon and several species (Populus tremuloides, Larix laricina, Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia, Salix scouleriana)
common to central AY rarely occur. The climate is continental cold, permafrost is continuous, and the class occurs
on residual soils and hillside colluvium on middle to upper slopes and well drained soils on flats. This class is
similar to the Picea glauca-Ledum decumbens (acidic) and Picea glauca-Dryas integrifolia (alkaline) associations of
Jorgenson et al. (2009), and the Upland Spruce Forest of Alaska (Jorgenson and Heiner 2004). The vegetation has
been referred to as forest-tundra transition (Chapin et al. 2006) or subarctic woodlands, and some of our area falls
within the Taiga Cordillera of the Canadian ecological framework (ESWG 1999). Because of little floristic variation
with altitude, a subalpine woodland in not differentiated in the Northern Alaska-Yukon sector.
Yukon Mixed Spruce-Birch-Aspen Forests have a mixture of coniferous (Picea glauca) and deciduous (Betula
neoalaskana) trees across the range of post-fire successional stages. The understory commonly has tall and
low shrubs (Alnus viridis ssp. crispa, Rosa acicularis), dwarf shrubs (Vaccinium vitis-idaea. Ledum groenlandicum,
Linnea borealis), forbs (Cornus canadensis, Chamerion angustifolium, Geocaulon lividum), grasses (Calamagrostis
canadensis) and mosses (Hylocomnium splendens, Pleurozium schreberi). The climate is continental-cold, permafrost
is discontinuous, and the class occurs on well-drained soils on residual soils, hillside colluvium, and loess. The
class is similar to the upland spruce-birch-aspen class of Van Cleve et al. (1983), upland moist needleleaf, mixed,
and broadleaf forest ecotypes of Jorgenson et al. (1999), and various spruce, birch, and aspen mixed stands of
Youngblood (1993).
Southern Alaska Spruce-Birch-Herb Forests have a mixture coniferous (Picea glauca) and deciduous (Betula
kenaica, Populus trichocarpa) trees. The understory has tall (Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata, Salix scouleriana, S. bebbiana),
low shrubs (Viburnum edule, Vaccinium vitis-idaea, Empetrum nigrum), ferns (Gymnocarpium dryopteris, Dryopteris
dilatata, Athyrium filix-femina), herbs (Cornus suecica, Linnaea borealis, Trientalis europaea ssp. arctica, Geranium
erianthum, Aconitum delphiniifolium, Streptopus amplexifoius), and grasses (Calamagrostis canadensis). The climate
is subcontinental-cold, permafrost occurs only in isolated patches, and well drained soils occur on hillside
colluvium, glacial till, and outwash. The class is similar to the upland rocky mixed forest ecotype of Jorgenson et al.
(2003), the lowland loamy mixed forest ecotype of Wells et al. (2013), and the forest types of Wibbenmeyer (1982).
Liard-Stikine Spruce-Birch-Aspen Forests are dominated by mixtures of spruce (Picea glauca) and deciduous
(Populus tremuloides, Betula neoalaskana) trees, with occasional lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) in a range
of successional stages after fire. The understory includes tall shrubs (Alnus viridis ssp. crispa), low shrubs
(Shepherdia canadensis, Rosa acicularis, Viburnum edule), dwarf shrubs (Vaccinium vitis-idaea, Linnaea borealis) and
feathermosses (Pleurozium schreberi, Hylocomium splendens). Populus tremuloides and Pinus contorta form more
extensive forests in areas of frequent fires. Picea mariana forests are rare on uplands, but dominate wetlands. Abies
lasiocarpa stands are sometimes present, particularly at higher elevations or in areas that have escaped fire for
long periods. It has a subcontinental to continental-cold bioclimate, permafrost occurs in isolated patches, and
occurs on glacial till and hillside colluvium on lower mountain slopes below 900-1000 m elevation. These forests
are in the Boreal White and Black Spruce zone (DeLong et al. 2011) of British Columbia (mostly ‘Dry Cool’ subzone;
part of ‘Moist Cool’ subzone) and Boreal Low Zone (Environment Yukon 2015a) of Yukon (Liard Basin subzone).
22
Southern Alaska Alder-Willow-Dwarf Birch Scrub comprised of both tall scrub (Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata,
Salix barclayii, S. scouleriana, Sambucus racemosa) and low scrub classes (Betula nana, Salix pulchra, Vaccinium
uliginosum). The alder tall shrub class has abundant herbs (Gymnocarpium dryopteris, Dryopteris dilatata ssp.
americana, Heracleum maximum, Trientalis europaea, Chamerion angustifolium, Aconitum delphiniifolium) and
grasses (Calamagrostis canadensis). In the low scrub class, other common species include Rubus arcticus, R.
chamaemorus, Spirea beauverdiana, lichens in drier areas and Sphagnum mosses in wetter areas. This type has a
subcontinental-cold bioclimate, permafrost is absent, and it occurs on hillside colluvium and glacial till. The alder
tall shrub type is abundant at higher elevations along the mountains in the Alaska Peninsula and Aklun mountains
and has been described by Talbot et al. (2005), Jorgenson et al. (2003), Clark and Duffy (2005), and Wells et al.
(2013). Low shrub classes have been described by Wells et al. (2012) and Wibbenmeyer et al. (1982).
Aleutian Heaths and Meadows is dominated by dwarf shrubs (Empetrum nigrum, Cassiope lycopodioides, Salix
arctica), sedges (Carex circinnata) and forbs (Geum calthifolium), interspersed with meadows with tall herbs
(Heracleum maximum, Angelica lucida, Athyrium filix-femina, Geum macrophyllum, Claytonia sibirica, Cardamine
oligosperma var. kamtschatica) and graminoids (Calamagrostis nutkaensis, Carex macrochaeta). The class has an
oceanic-cold bioclimate, permafrost is absent, and occurs on residual soils, hillside colluvium, and glacial till. The
class comprises the heath and mesic meadow associations described by Talbot et al. (2010).
Azonal Vegetation
Alaska-Yukon Wet Black Spruce Woodlands and Scrub Coniferous is dominated by spruce woodlands (Picea
mariana) with minor Tamarack (Larix laricina), interspersed with shrublands dominated by low and dwarf shrubs
(Ledum groenlandicum, Vaccinium uliginosum, Vaccinium vitis-idaea, Dasiphora fruticosa). Understory has horsetails
(Equisetum sylvaticum), forbs (Rubus chamaemorus), sedges (Carex bigelowii, Eriphorum vaginatum), and abundant
mosses (Hylocomium splendens, Pleurozium schreberi, Sphagnum fuscum). Birch forest (Betula neoalaskana)
occasionally occur. This class has a subcontinental- to continental-cold bioclimate, permafrost is discontinuous
with abundant thermokarst in the Yukon sector, and occurs on wet soils associated with abandoned floodplains,
retransported, and lacustrine deposits. This class includes the: wet acidic and nonacidic lowland communities of
Hollingworth et al. (2006), Picea mariana dominated communities of Foote (1983), lowland wet needleleaf forests
and low scrub of Jorgenson et al. (1999), Picea mariana – Vaccinium vitis-idaea alliance of Krestov (2000), and the
Picea mariana-Equisetum-Sphagnum association of DeLong et al. (1991).
Yukon Dry Spruce-Aspen Forests have mixtures of coniferous (Picea glauca) and deciduous forests (Populus
tremuloides, Betula neoalaskana) trees in a range of post-fire successional stages. The understory has low shrubs
(Salix glauca, Sheperdia canadensis, Ledum groenlandicum), dwarf shrubs (Arctostaphyos uva-ursi, Dryas integrifolia
in northern areas), forbs (Cornus canadensis, Linnea borealis), grasses (Calamagrostis purpurascens, Festuca altaica),
lichens (C. stellaris, C. rangiferina, Stereocaulon spp.) and mosses (Hylocomnium splendens, Pleurozium schreberi).
The class has a continental to hypercontinental-cool bioclimate, permafrost is discontinuous to sporadic, and it
has excessively drained soils often on eolian sand. Small stands occur on steep, south-facing bluffs grading into
steppe bluff vegetation, and rarely occurs in the southern AY. The class includes the: dry forests of Johnson and
Vogel (1966); Populus tremuloides-Arctostaphyos uva-ursi community of Youngblood (1993); Populus tremuloidesSheperdia canadensis of DeVelice (1999); upland dry broadleaf forests of Jorgenson et al. (2001); and upland white
spruce-dryas woodland of Jorgenson et al. (2009).
Yukon Sphagnum Bogs and Herbaceous Fens includes Sphagnum-dominated bogs with dwarf shrubs (Ledum
palustre ssp. decumbens, Vaccinium oxycoccos, Andromeda polifolia, Salix fuscescens), herbs (Drosera rotundifolia),
sedges (Eriophorum scheuchzeri, Carex rariflora, C. limosa, C. livida) and mosses (Sphagnum fuscum, S. balticum, S.
flexuosum, S. rubellum, S. angustifolium, S. riparium), interspersed with herbaceous fens with forbs (Menyanthes
trifoliata, Equisetum fluviatile, Comarum palustre, Cicuta virosa, Epilobium palustre, Galium trifidum) and sedges (C.
rostrata, C. diandra, C. canescens). The bioclimate is subcontinental- to continental cool, permafrost is absent, and
occurs on thick organic deposits often associated with thermokarst in the Yukon sector. The class includes the:
peat bogs of Drury (1956); lowland bog and fen meadow ecotypes of Jorgenson et al. (1999), and thermokarst bog
of Jorgenson et al. (2013).
Southern Alaska Sphagnum Bogs and Herbaceous Fens have Sphagnum-dominated bogs with dwarf shrubs
and fens that commonly form distinct string bog patterns, termed boreal aapa mire complexes in Europe.
Nutrient-poor fens comprise the majority of the mires and are dominated by sedges (Carex aquatilis, Tricophorum
caespitosum ssp. caespitosum, C. livida, C. limosa, C. pauciflora, C. chordorrhiza, Eriophorum angustifolium, E.
23
russeolum), herbs (Comarum palustre, Menyanthes trifoliata, Drosera spp., Equisetum fluviatile), and dwarf shrubs
(Andromeda polifolia, Betula nana, Chamaedaphne calyculata, Myrica gale, Salix fuscescens). Common mosses
include Drepanocladus aduncus, Sphagnum lindbergii, S. fimbriatum, S. teres, and S. girgensohnii. Islands of wet black
spruce woodlands are common. This class includes patterned bogs and bog meadow communities of Rosenberg
(1986), and organic-rich bog and sedge meadow ecotypes of Wells et al. (2012).
Yukon Floodplain Spruce-Poplar Forests and Scrub are dominated by forests with mixed coniferous (Picea
glauca) and deciduous (Populus balsamifera) trees, interspersed with tall and low scrub (Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia,
Viburnum edule, Salix alaxensis, Salix arbusculoides, Rosa acicularis). Other common species include grasses
(Calamagrostis canadensis), herbs (Equisetum arvense), and mosses (Hylocomium splendens, Rhytidiadelphus
triquetrus). In the Northern AY sector, Dryas spp. are common on gravelly floodplain steps. The class has a
continental-cool to cold bioclimate, permafrost is mostly absent, and occurs on silty to gravelly fluvial deposits. The
diverse class includes the: floodplain forests and scrub of Viereck et al. (1993); and riverine ecotypes of Jorgenson
et al. (1999, 2004, 2009).
Southern Alaska Floodplain Spruce-Cottonwood Forests and Scrub have mixed forests dominated by coniferous
(Picea glauca) and deciduous (Populus trichocarpa, Populus balsamifera, Betula kenaica) trees, interspersed with
tall and low shrubs (Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia, Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata, Salix alaxensis, Salix barclayi, Viburnum
edule, Rosa acicularis). The understory has abundant herbs (Athyrium filix-femina, Dryopteris dilatata ssp. americana,
Heracleum maximum, Equisetum arvense, Trientalis europaea ssp. arctica, Cornus suecica, Pyrola asarifolia), grasses
(Calamagrostis canadensis), and mosses (Hylocomium splendens, Pleurozium schreberi, Climacium dendroides).
The class has a subcontinental-cool bioclimate, lacks permafrost, and occurs on silty to gravelly fluvial deposits.
The class includes the: Picea X lutzii-Populus balsamifera ssp. trichocarpa-Alnus crispa ssp. sinuata community of
DeVelice (1999); and the riverine ecotypes of Jorgenson et al. (2003, 2008) and Wells et al. (2013).
Southern Alaska Coastal Meadows is dominated by halophytic wet meadows on tidal flats with graminoids
(Carex ramenskii, Puccinellia phryganodes, C. lyngbyei) and forbs (Triglochin maritima, Plantago maritima, Argentina
egedii ssp. egedii), and dry dunes dominated by graminoids (Leymus mollis, C. macrocephela, C. gmelini) and forbs
(Lathyrus japonicus, Ligusticum scoticum, Mertensia maritima). This class has a subcontinental-cool bioclimate, lacks
permafrost, and occurs on tidal flats and dunes. This diverse class includes the: halophytic wet meadow and slough
and riverbanks communities of Rosenberg (1986), coastal marsh communities of Tande (1996), coastal ecotypes of
Jorgenson et al. (2003), and coastal communities of Jorgenson et al. (2010).
Alaska-Yukon Freshwater and Aquatic Forbs includes large lakes with or without submergent vegetation
(Nuphar lutea ssp. polysepala , Sparganium spp., Utricularia spp., Myriophyllum spicatum, Zannichellia palustris,
Lemna minor, Hippuris vulgaris, Potamogeton spp., and Calliergon spp.). Regional variation for this class is not
well documented. Only very large lakes are mapped. The class includes the: deep marshes and floating-leaved
emergents of Rosenberg (1986); aquatic herbaceous communities of DeVelice (1999); lakes and ponds ecotype
of Jorgenson et al. (1999); boreal lacustrine pondlily ecotype of Jorgenson et al. (2008); lowland lake ecotype of
Jorgenson et al. (2009).
Glaciers and Icefields includes large ice fields and glaciers without vegetation, although nunitak peaks extending
above the ice may be sparsely vegetated.
24
Mapping
The CBVM map for the Alaska-Yukon region encompassed 1,639,751 km2, and included the Alaska boreal forest
regions, Aleutians, most of the Yukon Territory, and portions of northern British Columbia and western Northwest
Territories. The Alaska-Yukon boreal province encompasses 1,590,712 km2 and the Aleutians (eastern sector in
Alaska only) encompasses 49,039 km2.
Vegetation formations were differentiated into 13 classes at Level 1, and were dominated by Alpine Dwarf
Scrub and Meadows, Mixed Coniferous and Broadleaf Forests, Subalpine Woodlands and Scrub, and Coniferous
Woodlands and Scrub (Figure 8, Table 3). The Aleutian province was dominated by Dwarf Shrub Heaths and
Meadows (Oceanic).
Geographic variants were differentiated into 21 classes at Level 2, and were dominated by Yukon Spruce-BirchAspen Forests, Central-Northern Alaska-Yukon Alpine Dwarf Scrub and Meadows, Yukon Subalpine Spruce
Woodlands and Scrub, Northern Alaska-Yukon Spruce Woodlands and Scrub, and Southern Alaska-Yukon Alpine
Dwarf Scrub and Meadows (Figure 9, Table 3). The Aleutian Province was dominated by two vegetation types,
Aleutian Dwarf Shrub Heaths and Meadows and Aleutian Alpine Dwarf Scrub and Meadows.
In support of the Northwest Boreal Landscape Conservation Cooperative (NWBLCC), we summarized areal extent
of the boreal vegetation types within NWBLCC boundaries (Figure 10, Table 4). Most of the NWBLCC was within the
boundaries of the Alaska-Yukon Province, but small portions of the NWBLCC extends into arctic tundra in northern
Alaska, Yukon, and Northwest Territories (Arctic Tundra undifferentiated), the coastal rainforests (Northern
Pacific Maritime undifferentiated), and temperate coniferous forests in northern British Columbia (BC temperate
undifferentiated). Because we did not want to develop detailed classifications for vegetation outside of our study
area, we simplify grouped the areas into broad undifferentiated classes.
When comparing our small-scale vegetation mapping with the moderate-resolution land cover mapping of
Selkowitz and Stehman (2011), there was substantial correspondence between the land cover types and the
regional classification (Figure 11). Our alpine and subalpine classes usually had barren and dwarf shrub land cover
types. Our Alaska-Yukon Wet Black Spruce Woodlands and Scrub frequently had the woody wetlands land cover
type. Our Yukon Spruce-Birch-Aspen Forests frequently had the deciduous forests and evergreen land cover types.
Photo: Pi-Lens/Shutterstock.com
Figure 8 Map of vegetation formations (level 1) in the Alaska-Yukon region.
25
Figure 9. Map vegetation geographic variants (level 2) in the Alaska-Yukon and Aleutian boreal provinces.
26
27
Table 3. Areal extent (km2, Albers Alaska projection) of vegetation formations and geographic variants by boreal province.
Class
Alaska-Yukon
Aleutians
Total
C-Alpine Dwarf Scrub and Meadows
485040
19635
504675
D-Subalpine Woodlands and Scrub
294536
294536
E-Coniferous Woodlands and Scrub
149785
149785
G-Mixed Coniferous and Broadleaf Forests
360077
360077
H-Tall and Low Scrub
42213
42213
Formation (Level 1)
I-Dwarf Shrub Heaths and Meadows (Oceanic)
27596
27596
M-Wet Coniferous Woodlands and Scrub
91889
91889
N-Dry Mixed Coniferous and Broadleaf Forests
14061
14061
O-Mires (organic, peatlands, thermokarst)
48531
R-Floodplain Mixed Forests and Scrub
56443
56443
S-Coastal Meadows
1403
1403
W-Freshwater and Submergent Herbs
9662
9662
X-Glaciers and Ice Fields
37074
636
37710
1590712
49039
1639751
Total
1172
49702
Geographic Variant (Level 2)
Central-Northern AK-YK Alpine Dwarf Scrub and Meadows
371650
371650
Southern Alaska Alpine Dwarf Scrub and Meadows
113389
113389
Aleutian Alpine Dwarf Scrub and Meadows
19635
19635
Yukon Subalpine Spruce Woodlands and Scrub
203410
203410
Southern Alaska Subalpine Spruce Woodlands and Scrub
42822
42822
Liard-Stikine Subalpine Spruce-Fir Woodlands and Scrub
48303
48303
Northern Alaska-Yukon Spruce Woodlands and Scrub
149785
149785
Yukon Spruce-Birch-Aspen Forests
261858
261858
Southern Alaska Spruce-Birch-Herb Forests
44778
44778
Liard-Stikine Spruce-Birch-Aspen Forests
53441
53441
Southern Alaska Alder-Willow-Dwarf Birch Scrub
42213
42213
Aleutian Heaths and Meadows
27596
27596
Alaska-Yukon Wet Black Spruce Woodlands and Scrub
91889
91889
Yukon Dry Spruce-Aspen Forests
14061
14061
Yukon Sphagnum Bogs and Herbaceous Fens
44433
44433
Southern Alaska Sphagnum Bogs and Herbaceous Fens
4098
Yukon Floodplain Spruce-Poplar Forests and Scrub
49906
49906
S. Alaska Floodplain Spruce-Cottonwood Forests and Scrub
6537
6537
Southern Alaska Coastal Meadows
1403
1403
Alaska-Yukon Freshwater and Aquatic Forbs
9662
9662
Glaciers and Icefields
37074
636
37710
1590712
49039
1639751
Total
1172
5270
Figure 10 Map of vegetation geographic variants (level 2) within the boundaries of the Northwest Boreal Landscape Conservation Cooperative.
28
29
Table 4. Areal extent (km2, Albers Alaska projection) of vegetation geographic variants within the boundaries of the Northwest
Boreal Landscape Conservation Cooperative. Areas outside of the CBVM boreal region are listed as undifferentiated at the
bottom of the table.
Vegetation (Geographic Variant, Level 2)
Area (km2)
Central-Northern Alaska-Yukon Alpine Dwarf Scrub and Meadows
335798
Southern Alaska Alpine Dwarf Scrub and Meadows
63724
Yukon Subalpine Spruce Woodlands and Scrub
183171
Southern Alaska Subalpine Spruce Woodlands and Scrub
32017
Liard-Stikine Subalpine Spruce-Fir Woodlands and Scrub
48039
Northern Alaska-Yukon Spruce Woodlands and Scrub
105370
Yukon Spruce-Birch-Aspen Forests
255605
Southern Alaska Spruce-Birch-Herb Forests
23468
Liard-Stikine Spruce-Birch-Aspen Forests
53441
Southern Alaska Alder-Willow-Dwarf Birch Scrub
41
Alaska-Yukon Wet Black Spruce Woodlands and Scrub
87319
Yukon Dry Spruce-Aspen Forests
13664
Yukon Sphagnum Bogs and Herbaceous Fens
39550
Southern Alaska Sphagnum Bogs and Herbaceous Fens
2451
Yukon Floodplain Spruce-Poplar Forests and Scrub
41732
Southern Alaska Floodplain Spruce-Cottonwood Forests and Scrub
5268
Southern Alaska Coastal Meadows
366
Alaska-Yukon Freshwater and Aquatic Forbs
2679
Glaciers and Icefields
33696
Arctic, undifferentiated
5756
BC Temperate Undifferentiated
18498
NWT Boreal undifferentiated
2092
Northern Pacific Maritime (Undifferentiated)
4769
NPM Glaciers and Icefields
Total
6510
1,365,932
30
Figure 11. Portion of the CBVM map overlain on the NLCD land cover map of Alaska, illustrating the correspondence between the
two disparate vegetation mapping approaches.
31
Our mapping of the Alaska-Yukon region has several implications for the broader CBVM mapping effort. First,
both the MODIS (with review with Landsat) and topoclimate indices (PRISM climate data that incorporates
topography) were useful for polygon delineation. The topoclimate is particularly useful for alpine and subalpine
delineation. Second, assigning mean climate and elevation values to complete polygons was useful for coding
the bioclimate and vegetation formation attributes of the polygons. Third, extensive review of plant distributions
was needed to establish the geographic sectors. This could be more reliably be done with integrated databases
of plot information, but such comprehensive data were lacking for our entire region. Fourth, the simplification
of the vegetation classification hierarchy in to two levels greatly simplified the coding and made the map more
consistent with the vegetation map for Europe (Bohn et al. 2000). Fifth, while the minimum size for many of our
polygons was below the 560 km2 standard, most of these small polygons were coastal islands, and important
features, such a high volcanoes along the Aleutians, and large lakes. Our level of detail is consistent with the detail
of the European vegetation map (Bohn et al. 2000, 1:10M scale) and the Alaska vegetation map (Viereck and Little
1972, 1:5M scale) that also have numerous small polygons for distinctive features.
Summary and Conclusions
A map of boreal vegetation for the Alaska-Yukon region was developed to contribute to the circumboreal
vegetation mapping (CBVM) project. The effort included developing a map of bioclimates with 12 bioclimate
zones, a map of biogeographic provinces with Alaska-Yukon and Aleutian provinces, and a map of geographic
sectors with six sectors that provided the basis for classification of boreal vegetation. Vegetation mapping was
done at 1:7.5 million scale using the mapping protocols of the CBVM team. Mapping used MODIS imagery as the
basis for manual image interpretation and an integrated-terrain-unit approach, which included classifications for
bioclimate, physiography, generalized geology, permafrost, disturbance, growth from, geographic sector, and
vegetation. Vegetation was mapped at two hierarchical levels, including: (1) 13 formation groups differentiating
zonal and azonal systems; and (2) 21 geographic variants based on bioclimatic zonation and dominant species
that characterize broad longitudinal regions or biogeographic provinces. Each of the geographic variants was
described by identifying the dominant and characteristic species and its climatic and landscape characteristics, as
well as references that relate to the unit.
Photo: Roman Krochuk/Shutterstock.com
32
References
Bailey, R. G. 1996. Ecosystem Geography. Springer-Verlag, New York. 199 p.
Beikman, H. M. 1980. Geologic map of Alaska. U.S. Geol. Surv. Map Scale 1:2,500,000, p.
Bohn, U., G. Gollub and C. Hettwer. 2000. Map of the natural vegetation of europe. LV Druck, Germany. p.
Brown, D. E., F. Reichenbacher and S. E. Franson. 1998. A classification of North American biotic communities.
University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. 141 p.
Canada Centre for Remote Sensing (CCRS). 1999. Land Cover of Canada. Geomatics Canada, Natural Resources
Canada, National Atlas of Canada MCR 103, 1:6M scale map.
Chapin III, F. S., M. W. Oswood, K. Van Cleve, L. A. Viereck and D. L. Verbyla. 2006. Alaska’s Changing Boreal Forest.
Oxford University Press, New York. 354 p.
Clark, M. H. and M. S. Duffy. 2003. Soil Survey of Denali National Park Area, Alaska. Natural Resource Conservation
Service, Palmer, AK. 822 p.
Cody, W. J. 1996. Flora of Yukon Territory. NRC Research Press, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa,
Ottawa, Canada. 643 p.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 1997. Ecological Regions on North America. Commission for
Environmental Cooperation, Montréal, Québec. 71 p.
DeLong, C., R. M. Annas and A. C. Stewart. 1991. Boreal white and black spruce zone. In D. Meidinger and J. Pojar,
eds., Ecosystems of British Columbia. B. C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, B.C. Special Report Series 06, pp. 237250.
DeLong, C., A. Banner, W. H. MacKenzie, B. J. Rogers and B. Kaytor. 2011. A field guide to ecosystem identification
for the Boreal White and Black Spruce Zone of British Columbia. B.C. Min. For. Range, For. Sci. Prog., Victoria, B.C.
Land Manag. Handb. No. 65 (www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/Docs/Lmh/Lmh65.htm), 250 p.
Demarchi, D. A. 2011. The British Columbia Ecoregion Classification, Third Edition. Ecosystem Information Section,
Ministry of Environment, Victoria, British Columbia. http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/ecology/ecoregions/index.html,
p.
Demarchi, D. A., R. D. Marsh, A. P. Harcombe and E. C. Lea. 1990. The Environment. In N. K. Campbell, et al., eds.,
The Birds of British Columbia, Volume 1. Royal British Columbia Museum, Victoria, BC, and Canadian Wildlife
Service, Delta BC, 55-142 pp.
DeVelice, R. L., C. J. Hubbard, K. Boggs, S. Boudreau, M. Potkin, and others. 1999. Plant community types of the
Chugach National Forest, southcentral Alaska. Chugach National Forest, USDA Forest Service, Anchorage, AK.
Tech. Publ. R10-TP-76, p.
Dice, L. R. 1943. The biotic provinces of North America. Univ. of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Douglas, G. W. 1974. Montane zone vegetation of the Alsek River region, southwestern Yukon. Canadian Journal of
Botany 52 2505-2532.
Drury, W. H. 1956. Bog flats and physiographic processes in the upper Kuskokwim River region, Alaska.
Contributions from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University No. CLXXVIII 130 pp.
Ecological and Landscape Classification Technical Working Group (ELCTWG). 2014. Ecoregions of Yukon: Revisions
to the Yukon portion of the National Ecological Framework. Department of Environment, Policy, Planning &
Aboriginal Relations Branch. Ecological and Landscape Classification Coordinator, Report and Territorial map at
1:1,000,000 scale.
Ecological and Landscape Classification Technical Working Group (ELCTWG). 2015. Bioclimate Zones of Yukon –
Version 5 Interim Release. Department of Environment., Report and map at 1:1,000,000 scale.
Ecological Stratification Working Group (ESWG). 1996. A national ecological framework for Canada. Agriculture and
Agrifood Canada and Environment Canada, Ottawa/Hull. Report and national map. http://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/
references/1996ew a.html, p.
Ecoregions Working Group (EWG). 1989. Ecoclimatic regions of Canada, first approximation. Environment Canada,
Ottawa. Ecological Land Classif. Series No. 23, 118 p. with map (1:7.5 M scale).
Ecosystem Classification Group. 2010. Ecological Regions of the Northwest Territories – Cordillera. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, NT. 245 pp. + insert
map p.
Elvebakk, A., R. Elven and V. Y. Razzhivin. 1999. Delimitation, zonal, and sectorial subdivision of the Arctic for
the Panarctic Flora Project. In I. Nordal and V. Y. Razzhivin, eds., The species concept in the high North - a
panarcticflora initiative. Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, Oslo, Norway. pp. 375-386.
Environment Yukon. 2015a. A field guide to ecosite identification for Boreal Low of Yukon. Department of
Environment, Yukon Territory, Policy, Planning & Aboriginal Relations Branch, ELC Program, Whitehorse, Yukon
Territory. In press.
Environment Yukon. 2015b. Flynn, N. and Francis. S. (eds). Yukon Ecological and Landscape Classification
33
Guidelines Version 1.0. Department of Environment, Policy, Planning & Aboriginal Relations Branch, ELC
Program, Government of Yukon, Whitehorse, YK, 74 p.
Faber-Langendoen, D., T. Keeler-Wolf, D. Meidinger, D. Tart, C. Josse, and others. 2014. EcoVeg: A new approach to
vegetation description and classification. Ecol. Monog. 84 (4): 533-561.
Fleming, M. 1997. A statewide vegetation map of Alaska using phenological classification of AVHRR data. In D. A. W.
a. A. C. Lillie, eds., The Second Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Mapping Workshop, Arendal, Norway, 18-24 May
1996 and the CAVM-North American Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 14-16 January 1997. Institute of Arctic
and Alpine Research, pp. 25-26.Flynn, N. and S. Francis. 2012. The Yukon Ecosystem and Land Classification:
Overview and Concepts. Yukon ELC Working Group, Whitehorse, YK.
Foote, J. M. 1983. Classification, description, and dynamics of plant communities after fire in the Taiga of Interior
Alaska. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, U.S. Forest Service, Portland OR. Res. Pap.
PNW-307, 108 p.
Fulton, R. J. 1995. Surficial materials of Canada. Geol. Surv. Canada Map 1880A (scale 1:5 M).
Gallant, A. L., E. F. Binnian, J. M. Omernik and M. B. Shasby. 1995. Ecoregions of Alaska. U.S. Government Printing
Office, Washington, DC. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 1567, p.
Garroutte, M. D. and S. M. Ickert-Bond. 2013. Origins of varied floristic compositions in the western Aleutian and
Northern Bering Sea Islands. Alaska Park Science 12 (1): 70-79.
Hamann, A., T. Wang, D. L. Spittlehouse and T. Q. Murdock. 2013. A comprehensive, high-resolution database of
historical and projected climate surfaces for western North America. Bulletin of the American Meteorological
Society 94 1307–1309.
Hollingsworth, T. N., M. D. Walker, F. S. Chapin III and A. L. Parsons. 2006. Scale-dependent environmental controls
over species composition in Alaskan black spruce communities. Can. J. For. Res. 36 1781–1796
Hulten, E. 1937. Flora of the Aleutian Islands and western most Alaska Peninsula with notes on the flora of
Commander Island. Stockholm.397 p.
Hultén, E. 1968. Flora of Alaska and Neighboring Territories. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. 1008 p.
Johnson, P. L. and T. C. Vogel. 1966. Vegetation of the Yukon Flats region, Alaska. U.S. Army Cold Regions Research
and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH. Res. Rep. 209, 53 p.
Joint Federal State Land Use Planning Commission (JFSLUPC). 1973 Major ecosystems of Alaska. U.S. Geological
Survey, Denver, CO. p.
Jorgenson, M. T. 2012. Pilot-scale Mapping for Alaskan Portion of the Circumboreal Vegetation Map (CBVM). In S.
Talbot, eds., Proceedings of the 7 International: Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF)
Flora
Group Workshop, January 28-February 3, 2011. CAFF International Secretariat, CAFF Flora Expert Group (CFG),
Akureyri, Iceland. CAFF Proceedings Series Report Nr. 8, pp. 52-60.
Jorgenson, M. T., G. V. Frost, A. Miller, P. Spencer, M. Shephard, and others. 2010. Monitoring coastal salt marshes
in the Lake Clark and Katmai national parklands of the Southwest Alaska Network. National Park Service, Fort
Collins, CO. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SWAN/NRTR—2010/338.
Jorgenson, M. T., J. Harden, M. Kanevskiy, J. O’Donnel, K. Wickland, and others. 2013. Reorganization of vegetation,
hydrology and soil carbon after permafrost degradation across heterogeneous boreal landscapes.
Environmental Research Letters 8 (035017): 13.
Jorgenson, M. T., J. E. Roth, P. F. Loomis, E. R. Pullman, T. C. Cater, and others. 2008. An Ecological Land Survey
for Landcover Mapping of Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve. Natural Resource Program Center,
National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. Natural Resources Technical Report NPS/WRST/NRTR-2008/094, 265 p.
Jorgenson, M. T., J. E. Roth, P. F. Miller, M. J. Macander, M. S. Duffy, and others. 2009. An Ecological Land Survey and
Landcover Map of the Arctic Network. National Park Service, Ft Collins, CO, NPS/ARCN/NRTR—2009/270, 307 p.
Jorgenson, M. T., J. E. Roth, M. Raynolds, M. D. Smith, W. Lentz, and others. 1999. An ecological land survey for Fort
Wainwright, Alaska. U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH. CRREL Report
99-9, 83 p.
Jorgenson, M. T., J. E. Roth, S. F. Schlentner, E. R. Pullman, M. Macander, and others. 2003. An ecological land survey
for Fort Richardson, Alaska. U.S. Army Cold Regions, Hanover, NH. TR03-19, 99 p.
Jorgenson, M. T., J. E. Roth, M. D. Smith, S. Schlentner, W. Lentz, and others. 2001. An ecological land survey for Fort
Greely, Alaska. U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH. ERDC/CRREL TR-0104., 85 p.
Jorgenson, M. T., C. W. Slaughter and L. A. Viereck. 1984. Vegetation mapping utilizing a hierarchical vegetation
classification system in central Alaska. In: Inventorying forest and other vegetation of the high latitude and
high altitude regions: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Society of American Foresters Regional
Technical Conference. Society of American Foresters, Fairbanks, AK.
Landfire. 2011. Landfire. Alaska Webinars (March 16 and March 23, 2011). http://www.landfire.gov/documents
alaskawebinars.php, p.
34
Lausi, D. and P. L. Nimis. 1985. Quantitative phytogeography of the Yukon Territory (NW Canada) on a chorologicalphytosociological basis. Vegetatio 59:9-20.
Little, E. L. 1971. Atlas of United States trees. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Vol. 1, Miscellaneous Publication 1146.
McLaughlin, S. P. 2007. Tundra to Tropics: The Floristic Plant Geography of North America. Botanical Research
Institute of Texas, Fort Worth, TX. 58 p.
Meidinger, D. and W. MacKenzie. 2012. Applying the proposed circumboreal vegetation map legend to western
Canada. In S. Talbot, eds., Proceedings of the 7 International: Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF)
Flora Group Workshop, January 28-February 3, 2011. CAFF International Secretariat, CAFF Flora Expert Group
(CFG), Akureyri, Iceland. CAFF Proceedings Series Report Nr. 8, pp. 63-67.
Meidinger, D. V. and J. Pojar. 1991. Ecosystems of British Columbia. British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria BC.
Special Report Series 06. https://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/ Docs/Srs/Srs06.htm
Murray, D. F. and R. Lipkin. 1987. Candidate threatened and endangered plants of Alaska. University of Alaska
Museum, Fairbanks, AK.
Nowacki, G., P. Spencer, T. Brock, M. Fleming and T. Jorgenson. 2002. Ecoregions of Alaska and Neighboring
Territories. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. OF Rep. 02-297.
Orloci, L. and W. Staneck. 1979. Vegetation survey of the Alaska Highway, Yukon Territory: types and gradients.
Vegetatio 41:1-56.
Oswald, E. T. and J. P. Senyk. 1977 Ecoregions of the Yukon. Canadian Forestry Service, Victoria, British Columbia.
Information Report BC-X-164. https://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/ publications?id=1723 p.
Ovenden, L. and G. R. Brassard. 1988. Wetland vegetation near Old Crow, northern Yukon. Can. Jour. Bot. 67:954960.
Pojar, J., K. Klink and J. Meidinger. 1987. Biogeoclimatic ecosystem classification in British Columbia. Forest Ecology
and Management 22:119-154.
Pojar, J. and A. C. Stewart. 1991. Alpine tundra zone. In eds., Ecosystems of British Columbia. B. C. Ministry of
Forests, Victoria, B.C. Special Report Series 0.
Prism Climate Group. 2008. Alaska Climatology Normals 1961-1990, Alaska. Oregon State University, Corvallis, AR.
http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu.
Raynolds, M. K., D. A. Walker and H. A. Maier. 2006. Alaska Arctic Tundra Vegetation Map, Scale 1:4,000,000. U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Center, Anchorage, AK
Resources Inventory Committee (RIC). 1998. Standards for Broad Terrestrial Ecosystem Classification and Mapping
for British Columbia: Classification and Correlation of the Broad Habitat Classes used in 1:250,000 Ecological
Mapping. Ecosystems Working Group, Terrestrial Ecosystems Task Force, Version 2.0. http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/
ecology/bei/, p.
Ricketts, T. H. E. 1999. Terrestrial Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment. Island Press, Vol. 1.
Rivas-Martínez, S., S. Rivas Saenz and A. Penas. 2011. Worldwide bioclimatic classification system. Global
Geobotany 1:1-634.
Rivas-Martínez, S. and D. Sánchez-Mata. 2011. Boreal vegetation series of North America. Plant Biosystems 145
(sup1): 208-219.
Rivas-Martínez, S., D. Sánchez-Mata and M. Costa. 1999. North American boreal and western temperate forest
vegetation. Itinera Geobotanica 12:5-316.
Rosenberg, D. 1986. Wetland types and bird use of Kenai Lowlands. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, AK.
Special Studies, p.
Rowe, J. S. and W. E. D. Halliday. 1972. Forest regions of Canada. Canadian Forestry Service, Ottawa, Ontario.
Publication 1300.
Sanchez-Mata, D. and S. Rivas-Martínez. 2010. Bioclimatic framework of the CBVM project. In eds., Proceedings of
the Fifth International Workshop: Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) Flora Group. Circumboreal
Vegetation Mapping (CBVM) Workshop, Helsinki, Finland, 2008. CAFF International Secretariat, Akureyi,
Iceland. CAFF Technical Report No. 21, pp. 132-136.
Schmitt, C. B., A. Belokurov, C. Besançon, L. Boisrobert, N. D. Burgess, and others. 2009. Global Ecological Forest
Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis. Freiburg University Press, Freiburg, Germany. 2nd
Edition, 34 p.
Selkowitz, D. J. 2012. An Overview of the Role of Remote Sensing in the Production of the Circumboreal Vegetation
Map (CBVM). In S. Talbot, eds., Proceedings of the 7 International: Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna
(CAFF) Flora Group Workshop, Akureyri, Iceland, January 28-February 3, 2011. CAFF
International
Secretariat, CAFF Flora Expert Group (CFG), CAFF Proceedings Series Report Nr. 8.
Selkowitz, D. J. and S. V. Stehman. 2011. Thematic accuracy of the National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2001 land
cover for Alaska. Remote Sensing of Envir. 115:1401–1407.
Simpson, J. J., M. C. Stuart and C. Daly. 2007. A discriminant analysis model of alaskan biomes based on spatial
35
climatic and environmental data. Arctic 60 (4): 341-369.
Smith, C. A. S., J. C. Meikle and C. F. Roots. 2004. Ecoregions of the Yukon Territory: Biophysical properties of Yukon
landscapes. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Summerland, British Columbia. PARC Technical Bulletin No.0401, 313 p.
Spetzman, L. A. 1963. Terrain study of Alaska, Part V: vegetation. Office of Chief Engineer, U.S. Dept. of Army,
Washington, D.C. Engineering Intelligence Study EIS 301.
Takhtajan, A. 1986 Floristic regions of the world (Transl. by T.J.Crovello.). Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley.
Talbot, S. S. and C. J. Markon. 1986. Vegetation Mapping of Nowitna National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska Using Landsat
MSS Digital Data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 52 (6): 791-799.
Talbot, S. S. and C. J. Markon. 1988. Intermediate-scale vegetation mapping of Innoko National Wildlife Refuge,
Alaska using Landsat MSS digital data. Photogram. Engin. Rem. Sens. 54 (3): 377-383.
Talbot, S. 2008. Vegetation mapping in boreal Alaska. CAFF International Secretariat, CAFF Flora Expert Group
(CFG), CAFF Technical Report No. 21, 74-84 p.
Talbot, S. S. and W. J. Meades. 2011. Circumboreal Vegetation Map (CBVM): Concept Paper. CAFF Flora Group (CFG),
CAFF International Secretariat, Akureyri, Iceland. CAFF Strategy Series Report No. 3.
Talbot, S. S., W. B. Schofield, S. L. Talbot and F. J. A. Daniels. 2010. Vegetation of eastern Unalaska Island, Aleutian
Islands, Alaska. Botany 88 366-388.
Talbot, S. S. and S. L. Talbot. 1994. Numerical classification of the coastal vegetation of Attu Island, Aleutian Islands,
Alaska. Journal of Vegetation Science 5 (867-876):
Talbot, S. S., S. L. Talbot and F. J. A. Daniels. 2005. Comparative phytosociological investigation of subalpine alder
thickets in southwestern Alaska and the North Pacific. Phytocoenologia 35 (4): 727-759.
Tande, G. F. 1996. Mapping and classification of coastal marshes - Lake Clark National Park and Preserve, Alaska.
Lake Clark National Park and Preserve, National Park Service, Anchorage, AK. 56 p.
Tuhkanen, S. 1984. A circumboreal system of climatic-phytogeographical regions. Acta Botanica Fennica 127:1-50.
Tuhkanen, S. 1993. Treeline in relation to climate, with special reference to oceanic areas. In J. Alden, eds., Forest
Development in Cold Climates. Plenum Press, New York. NATO ASI Series Volume 244, pp. 115-134.
Udvardy, M. D. F. 1975. A classification of the biogeographical provinces of the world. International Union for
Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Morges, Switzerland. 47 p.
Van Cleve, K., C. T. Dyrness, L. A. Viereck, J. Fox, F. S. Chapin III, and others. 1983. Taiga ecosystems in Interior Alaska.
BioScience 33 (1): 39-44.
Vegetation Subcommittee. 2008. National Vegetation Classification Standard, Version 2. Federal Geographic Data
Committee, Secretariat, U.S. Geological Survey. Reston, VA. , Washington, D.C. FGDC-STD-005-2008 (Version 2)
126 p.
Viereck, L. A. 1979. Characterisitcs of treeline plant communities in Alaska. Holarctic Ecology 2:228-238.
Viereck, L. A., C. T. Dyrness, A. R. Batten and K. J. Wenzlick. 1992. The Alaska Vegetation Classification. Pacific
Northwest Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Portland, OR. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-286., 278 p.
Viereck, L. A., C. T. Dyrness and M. J. Foote. 1993. Vegetation and soils of the floodplain ecosystems of the Tanana
River, interior Alaska. Canadian J. Forest Research 23:889 - 898.
Viereck, L. A., C. T. Dyrness, K. Van Cleve and M. J. Foote. 1983. Vegetation, soils, and forest productivity in selected
forest types in interior Alaska. Canadian J. Forestry 13:703-720.
Viereck, L. A. and E. L. Little. 1972. Alaska Trees and Shrubs. U.S. Forest Service, Washington, DC. Agriculture
Handbook No. 410. 265 p.
Viereck, L. A., K. Van Cleve and C. T. Dyrness. 1986. Forest ecosystem distribution in the Taiga Environment. In K. Van
Cleve, et al., eds., Forest ecosystems in the Alaskan taiga: a synthesis of structure and function. Springer-Verlag,
New York. pp. 22-43.
Walker, D. A., W. A. Gould, H. A. Meier and M. K. Raynolds. 2002. The circumpolar arctic vegetation map.
International Journal of Remote Sensing 23:2552-2570.
Wells, A., M. Macander, T. Jorgenson, T. Christopherson, B. Baird, and others. 2013. Ecological land survey and soil
landscapes map for Lake Clark National Park and Preserve, Alaska, 2011. National Park Service, Fort Collins,
Colorado. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/LACL/NRTR—2013/693.
Wibbenmeyer, M., J. Grunblatt and L. Shea. 1982. User’s guide for Bristol Bay land cover maps. Alaska Dept. Natural
Resources, Anchorage, AK. 120 p.
Wiken, E. B., C. D. A. Rubec and G. Ironside. 1993. Terrestrial ecoregions of Canada. Environment Canada, National
Atlas of Canada, 5th Ed., MCR 4164, Map 1:7.5 M p.
Wiken, E. B., D. M. Welch, G. R. Ironside and D. G. Taylor. 1981. Ecodistricts of the northern Yukon. Environment
Canada, Ottawa, CA.
Youngblood, A. 1993. Community type classification of forest vegetation in young, mixed stands, interior Alaska.
US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon. Res. Pap.
PNW-RP-458, 42 p.
36
Appendix of Mapping Attributes
Conventions
►► Published Scale: 1:7.5 M
►► Delineation scale: 1:4 M (floodplains @ 1:2 M, 1 mm)
►► Mininum size:
• 3 mm, ~23x23km, 560 km2, 560,250,000 m2, typical
• 2 mm, ~15x15km, 225 km2, 225,000,000 m2, rare-special features
• 1 mm width for linear features (floodplains, coast) for continuity
►► Complexes: Not used, described within Unit description, after Bohn 2000
►► Initially identify map units of MODIS, then refine on Landsat
Input layers
►► Modis Imagery (USGS)
►► GeoCover (Landsat mosaic)
►► DEM hillshade (gt30)
►► Hydrography (DCW, simplification USGS, CAVM algorithm)
►► Bedrock Geology (regional)
►► Surficial Geology (regional)
►► Glaciation Limits
►► Climate Temperature
►► Climate Precip.
►► Fire History
►► Treeline (Growing Degree Days Base 5 deg C: 680 to 740)
Bioclimates
(Required, 2-letter code, continentality-thermotype, e.g. CM)
Continentality Index (Ic), Obrothermic Index (Io), Mean annual temperature (T deg C)
Continentality
H
Hyperoceanic
(Ic<11, Io>3.6, T<6.0)
O
Oceanic
Ic=11-21, Io>3.6, T<5.3)
S
Subcontinental
(Ic=21-28, Io>3.6, T<4.8)
C
Continental
(Ic=28-46, Io>3.6, T<3.8)
Y
Hypercontinental
(Ic=>46, Io-,
X
Xeric
(Ic=>46, Io>3.6, T<3.8)
T<0.0)
Thermotype
W
Warm
(GDD>1200)
Approx. Thermoboreal
(Tp> 680)
M
Meso
(GDD=900-1200)
Approx. Mesoboreal
(Tp=580-680)
C
Cold
(GDD=700-900)
Approx. Supraboreal
(Tp=480-580)
F
Frigid
(GDD=300-700)
Approx. Oroboreal
(Tp=380-480)
Y
Cryic
(GDD=100-300)
Approx. Cryoboreal
(Tp=1-380)
Where: Tp=sum of tenths of degrees centigrade of the mean monthly temperatures, above 0°, ΣTi1-12 > 0°C
Physiography
(required)
►► I
►► MH
►► ML
►► P
►► G
►► U
►► O
Icefields and Glaciers
Mountains, High (rugged)
Mountains, Low (rounded)
Plateau (High flats)
Glaciated Uplands
Uplands/Hills (without alpine, water shedding)
Rolling (low gentle hills, Mixed upland and lowland)
37
►►
►►
►►
►►
L
Lowlands and Plains (low flats, water gathering, includes waterbodies)
R
Riverine (active and inactive)
C
Coastal Flats
WWater
Geology
(optional)
Unconsolidated
►► C Colluvium (hillside creep, rocky-loamy)
►► El Eolian silt (loess)
►► Es Eolian sand
►► Fy Fluvial, young (active-inactive floodplains)
►► Fo Fluvial, old (abandoned floodplains, terraces)
►► Fs Retransported (lower slopes, valley bottoms)
►► Gd Glacial (late Pleistocene, LGM)
►► Gi Glaciers and Ice Sheets
►► GLGlaciolacustrine
►► GF Glaciofluvial Outwash
►► LLacustrine
►► RMarine
►► O
Organic (>40cm, peatlands)
►► WWater
►► UUndifferentiated
Bedrock
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
Sc Sn Sm Vfy
Vfo Vmy Vmo Vp If Im Iu Mc Mn Mm BC Sedimentary, carbonate
Sedimentary, noncarbonate
Sedimentary, mixed Volcanic-felsic and intermediate-younger (partially)
Volcanic-felsic and intermediate -older
Volcanic-mafic-younger
Volcanic-mafic-older
Volcanic-pyroclastics (tephra)
Intrusive-felsic and intermediate (e.g., granitic)
Intrusive-mafic (e.g., gabbro)
Intrusive-ultramafic (e.g., dunite, serpentine)
Metamorphic, carbonate
Metamorphic, noncarbonate
Metamorphic, mixed
Bedrock Complex
Permafrost
(optional)
Continuity
►► C
Continuous (>90%)
►► D
Discontinuous (50-90%)
►► S
Sporadic (10-50%)
►► I
Isolated (>0-10%)
►► A
Absent (0%)
Informed by permafrost map, but improve when possible
Disturbance Factors
(optional)
►► Fh
►► Fl
Fire-high frequency
Fire-low frequency
38
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
FTFire-Thermokarst
G
Geomorphic Process
Gc Coastal erosion and deposition
Gf
Fluvial erosion and deposition
GlLandslides
GpPeriglacial
GgGlacial
W
Weather Processes (e.g. wind)
TThermokarst
IInsects
H
Human generated
Hd Urban complex
Hc Clearings (Non-agricultural or undifferentiated)
Ha Agricultural Field
HfForestry
HrReforested
HgGrazing
C
Disturbance complex
ND Not Determined
Growth Form
(Required, dominant structure)
►► AAquatic-Water
►► P
Partially vegetated (<30% veg cover)
►► B
Bryophytes, Mosses
►► LLichen
►► HHerbaceous
►► Hm Mixed Graminoid/Forb Meadows
►► HgGraminoid
►► Hgt Tussock graminoid
►► SShrub
►► Sp Prostrate Shrub (used in tundra mapping)
►► Sd Dwarf Shrub (<25 cm)
►► Sl
Low Shrub (25-1.5 m)
►► St
Tall Shrub (>1.5 m)
►► Fb Broadleaf Forest (deciduous, small leaved, Betula, Populus)
►► Fm Mixed Forest (needleleaf and broadleaf )
►► Fn Needleleaf (use coniferous?)
►► Fned Needleleaf Evergreen Dark-leaved (Picea-Abies)
►► Fnel Needleleaf Evergreen Light-leaved Forest (Pinus)
►► Fnm Needleleaf Mixed (Picea, Abies, Pinus, Larix)
►► Fnd Needleleaf Deciduous Forest (Larix)
►► IIce
►► ND Not determined
Province
Biogeographic province having distinctive flora assemblage, endemics, or vegetation patterns
Geographic Sector
(Required, GeogSector, Province)
Subregion of Province with unique dominant vegetation
►► NE Northern European (00 series)
►► SW Western Siberian (10)
►► SC Central Siberian (20)
►► SE Eastern Siberian (30)
►► NS Northeastern Siberian (40)
►► AS Altai-Sayan (50)
39
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
TB
OK
AY
AYN
AYW
AYC
AYS
AYL
CW
CE
AL
NA
Trans-baikalian (60)
Okhotsk-Kamchatka (70)
Alaska-Yukon (80)
Northern Alaska-Yukon (81)
Western Alaska (82)
Yukon (Central Alaska-Yukon)(83)
Southern Alaska (Southwestern)(84)
Liard-Stikine (Southeastern Yukon)(85)
West-Central Canada (90)
Eastern Canada (100)
Aleutian (110)
North Atlantic (Iceland, Greenland, Faroe Islands) (120)
Vegetation Formation
(Level 1, required)
Zonal
►► C
Alpine Dwarf Scrub and Meadows (vegetation in boreal zone)
►► D
Subalpine Woodlands and Scrub
►► E
Coniferous Woodlands and Scrub (10-25% cover)
►► F
Coniferous Forests (open 25-60% to closed >60%)
►► G
Mixed Coniferous and Broadleaf Forests
►► H
Tall and Low Scrub
►► I
Dwarf Shrub Heaths and Meadows (Oceanic)
Extrazonal
►► A
Arctic Tundras
►► J
Broadleaf Forests (extrazonal, or not used?)
►► K
Dry Grasslands (Steppes)
Azonal
►► M
Wet Coniferous Woodlands and Scrub (lowlands, permafrost)
►► N
Dry Mixed Coniferous and Broadleaf Forests (sand dunes, dry soils)
►► O
Mires (organic, peatlands, thermokarst)
►► R
Floodplain Mixed Forests and Scrub (riverine)
►► S
Coastal Meadows (salt-affected)
►► W Freshwater and Submergent Herbs
►► X
Glaciers and Ice Fields
►► Y
Rock (mountain barrens, lava flows)
►► UUndifferentiated
FormSectCode
Unique code for each GeogVari
Code uses Formation code and number for Sector
GeogVari-GEOGRAPHIC VARIANT (Level 2, MapUnit)
Full name Based on combing Formation and Geographic Sector
Bioclimate is provided in description
Name includes dominant species
eg. Yukon Spruce-Birch-Aspen Forests (Continental Cold Boreal)
For further information and additional copies
contact:
CAFF INTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT
Borgir
Nordurslod
600 Akureyri
ICELAND
Telephone: +354 462 3350
Fax: +354 462 3390
E-mail: [email protected]
Internet: http: //www.caff.is
ISBN: 978-9935-431-48-6