( V1 + V2 2 ) 147 ] = 0.01 [ 1 + ( (80 mi/h Γ— 5280 ft 1 mi Γ— 1 h 3600

2.17 If the car in Example 2.9 had 𝐢𝐷 = 0.45 and 𝐴𝑓 = 25 ft2, what is the difference in minimum theoretical
stopping distances with and without aerodynamic resistance considered (all other factors the same as in
Example 2.9)?
Solution
(a)
1- Calculate coefficient of rolling friction π‘“π‘Ÿπ‘™ using the formula:
π‘“π‘Ÿπ‘™ = 0.01 [1 +
V +V
( 1 2 2)
147
5280 ft
1h
(80 mi/h × 1 mi × 3600 sec) + 0
(
)
2
] = 0.01 1 +
= 0.0134
147
[
]
2- Determine the coefficient of aerodynamic resistance
πΎπ‘Ž =
𝜌
0.0024
𝐢𝐷 𝐴𝑓 =
× 0.45 × 25 = 0.00135
2
2
3- Calculate theoretical stopping distance with aerodynamic resistance (S) using the formula:
𝛾𝑏 π‘Š
πΎπ‘Ž 𝑉1 2
]
𝑠=
ln [1 +
2gπΎπ‘Ž
πœ‚π‘ πœ‡π‘Š + π‘“π‘Ÿπ‘™ π‘Š βˆ’ π‘Š sin(πœƒg )
Here, π‘Š is total weight of the vehicle, 𝛾𝑏 is baking mass factor, g is gravitational constant, πœ‡ is
coefficient of road adhesion, π‘“π‘Ÿπ‘™ is coefficient of rolling resistance, and πœƒg is angle of grade, πœ‚π‘
is braking efficiency.
Substitute 1.04 for 𝛾𝑏 , 80 mi/h for 𝑉1 , 2500 Ib for π‘Š , 32.2 ft/s2 for g , 80 % for πœ‚π‘ , 0.70 for
πœ‡ ,0.0134 for π‘“π‘Ÿπ‘™ , 5.71° for πœƒg .
2
5280 ft
1h
0.0135 × (80 ×
×
)
1.04 × 2500
1 mi
3600 sec
𝑠=
ln [1 +
]
2 × 32.2 × 0.0135
0.8 × 0.7 × 2500 + 0.0134 × 2500 βˆ’ 2500 sin 5.71°
= 2990 ln [1 +
185.856
] = 435.70 ft
1184.76
(b)
4- Calculate theoretical stopping distance by ignoring aerodynamic resistance (S) using the
formula:
2
5280 ft
1h
1.04 [(80 mi/h × 1 mi × 3600 sec) βˆ’ (0)2 ]
2
2
𝛾𝑏 (𝑉1 βˆ’ 𝑉2 )
𝑠=
=
= 451.65 ft
2g(πœ‚π‘ πœ‡ + π‘“π‘Ÿπ‘™ ± sin πœƒg ) 2 × (32.2) [( 80 ) (0.70) + (0.0134) βˆ’ sin(5.71°)]
100
Thus, the theoretical slopping distance without aerodynamic resistance is 451.65 ft