2.17 If the car in Example 2.9 had πΆπ· = 0.45 and π΄π = 25 ft2, what is the difference in minimum theoretical stopping distances with and without aerodynamic resistance considered (all other factors the same as in Example 2.9)? Solution (a) 1- Calculate coefficient of rolling friction πππ using the formula: πππ = 0.01 [1 + V +V ( 1 2 2) 147 5280 ft 1h (80 mi/h × 1 mi × 3600 sec) + 0 ( ) 2 ] = 0.01 1 + = 0.0134 147 [ ] 2- Determine the coefficient of aerodynamic resistance πΎπ = π 0.0024 πΆπ· π΄π = × 0.45 × 25 = 0.00135 2 2 3- Calculate theoretical stopping distance with aerodynamic resistance (S) using the formula: πΎπ π πΎπ π1 2 ] π = ln [1 + 2gπΎπ ππ ππ + πππ π β π sin(πg ) Here, π is total weight of the vehicle, πΎπ is baking mass factor, g is gravitational constant, π is coefficient of road adhesion, πππ is coefficient of rolling resistance, and πg is angle of grade, ππ is braking efficiency. Substitute 1.04 for πΎπ , 80 mi/h for π1 , 2500 Ib for π , 32.2 ft/s2 for g , 80 % for ππ , 0.70 for π ,0.0134 for πππ , 5.71° for πg . 2 5280 ft 1h 0.0135 × (80 × × ) 1.04 × 2500 1 mi 3600 sec π = ln [1 + ] 2 × 32.2 × 0.0135 0.8 × 0.7 × 2500 + 0.0134 × 2500 β 2500 sin 5.71° = 2990 ln [1 + 185.856 ] = 435.70 ft 1184.76 (b) 4- Calculate theoretical stopping distance by ignoring aerodynamic resistance (S) using the formula: 2 5280 ft 1h 1.04 [(80 mi/h × 1 mi × 3600 sec) β (0)2 ] 2 2 πΎπ (π1 β π2 ) π = = = 451.65 ft 2g(ππ π + πππ ± sin πg ) 2 × (32.2) [( 80 ) (0.70) + (0.0134) β sin(5.71°)] 100 Thus, the theoretical slopping distance without aerodynamic resistance is 451.65 ft
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz