AN OPTOFLUIDIC DIFFUSIVITY PROBE FOR REAL-TIME CHEMICAL REACTION MONITORING H. T. Zhao1, Y. Yang2, L. K. Chin1, W. M. Zhu1, Z. H. Yang3, H. X. Zhang3 and A. Q. Liu1† 1 School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798 2 School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China 3 Institute of Microelectronics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China ABSTRACT This paper reports a novel optofluidic approach to monitor chemical reactions in real-time. This approach is based on the fact that molecular size change in chemical reactions will lead to a change of the average diffusion coefficient. Here we use the diffusivity change as an indicator to monitor the progress of chemical reactions. The hydrolysis of maltose catalyzed by maltase is used as a demonstration. The results indicate that the optimum condition for maltase is at pH 6.0 and 35℃. This approach can be used to reduce the cost and simplify the procedure of reaction monitoring in chemical, pharmaceutical and process industries. KEYWORDS: Chemical reaction monitor, Optofluidic, Diffusivity, Hydrolysis INTRODUCTION Microreactor technology is an efficient tool for chemical reactions such as synthesis and hydrolysis and has great potential applications in chemical, pharmaceutical and process industries [1, 2]. However, there is a continuous requirement in the integration of the analytical tools for fast and reliable process monitoring. The conventional methods for chemical reaction monitoring include spectroscopy, photochemistry, electrochemistry and so forth [3-5]. The spectroscopy approach analyzes the chemical composition at different positions and hence determines the reaction rates. This approach is universal and can be applied in many chemical reactions. However, it requires expensive and complicated detection setup, which is difficult to be integrated in the lab-on-a-chip systems. The photochemistry and electrochemistry approaches are chip compatible, but they are suffering from low-resolution problem. In this paper, for the first time, chemical reactions are monitored in an optofluidic chip by determining the average diffusivity of reaction products in real time. In the experiment, the hydrolysis of maltose catalyzed by maltase is used as a demonstration. WORKING PRINCIPLE Figure 1 illustrates the working principle of the optofluidic probe. The microchip consists of a microreactor and an optofluidic detecting region. In the microreactor, maltose solution (molar concentration: 1 mol/L) and maltase solution (mass concentration: 30 mg/mL) are injected into the reactor with the flow rate ranging from 0.5 μL/min to 1 μL/min as shown in Fig. 1(a). The dimension of the microreactor is 5 mm (length) × 70 µm (width) ×120 µm (height). In the hydrolysis reaction, maltose molecule is catalyzed by maltase and broken down into glucose molecules. The reaction time in the microreactor is around 10 seconds. The products are then drawn into the optofluidic detecting region as the core stream, while deionized water is injected as the cladding streams. From Stokes-Einstein equation, the diffusion coefficient of a molecule is correlated to its molecular size. Here the diffusion coefficient of glucose (6.75×10-10 m2/s) is three times faster than that of maltose (2.21×10-10 m2/s) as shown in Fig. 1(b). The diffusivity variation leads to a less-contrast refractive index distribution and consequently a different light propagation pattern. For example, the focal points move rightwards with the hydrolysis reaction as shown in Fig. 1(c). Based on the light pattern, the diffusivity can be easily measured which is elaborated in previous work [6]. Therefore, the chemical reactions can be monitored in real-time by probing the diffusivity change of the solution. 978-0-9798064-7-6/µTAS 2014/$20©14CBMS-0001 2110 18th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences October 26-30, 2014, San Antonio, Texas, USA Diffusion Coefficient -10 2 (10 m /s) Laser input Maltose Maltase Maltose 88 x0 10 -10 0.4 0.8 1.6 Glucose 66 44 1.2 Maltose 2 21 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.8 0.6 0.4 Concentration (mol/L) Maltase 0.2 0.2 (b) (i) w/o maltase C12H22O11+H20 Maltase (ii) w/ maltase 2∙C6H12O6 (Maltose) (Glucose) Light propagation pattern Refractive index profile (c) (a) Figure 1: Working principle of the proposed optofluidic probe for chemical reaction monitoring. (a) Schematic of the optofluidic microchip, (b)the diffusion coefficient of maltose and glucose as a function of concentration, and (c) refractive index profile and light propagation pattern (i) without and (ii) with hydrolysis reaction. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Figure 2 shows the measured light propagation patterns without and with 10 mg/mL of maltase at pH 7.0 and 25℃. The maltase and maltose are injected at 0.5 μL/min, while the cladding streams are flowing at 1 μL/min. Figure 3 shows the light intensity profile along the central line of the microchannel. The focal points moves rightwards when maltase are added. Based on the previous work [6], the average diffusion coefficients with and without maltase are determined to be 2.1 and 5.2 ×10-10 m2/s, respectively. In order to quantify the percentage of reaction, the diffusivity of prescribed solutions are measured with different compositions. Figure 4 shows that the percentages of hydrolyzed maltose are linearly proportional to the measured diffusivity. Without maltase 10 mg/mL ∆1 ∆2 ∆3 With maltase Maltase: 10 mg/mL Figure 2: Light propagation pattern without and with 10 mg/mL of maltase, respectively. Light Intensity (a.u.) 1.1 ∆1 0 mg/mL ∆2 ∆3 0.9 0.7 0.5 0 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Normalized Position Figure 3: Normalized light intensity along the central line of the microchannel. 2111 0.2 Figure 4: Relationship between the percentages of hydrolyzed maltose and measured average diffusivity. Figure 5: Effects of temperature and pH on the hydrolysis reaction of maltose. Figure 5 shows the influence of different temperature and pH values on the hydrolysis speed of maltose. The maximum hydrolysis of 71.8% maltose occurs at 35℃, then the reaction abruptly declines with further increment of temperature (pH is maintained at 7.0). On the other hand, the reaction reaches a maximum percentage of 78.1% at pH 6.0 and 35℃, which indicates the optimum temperature and pH value. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, an optofluidic diffusivity probe is designed and developed for chemical reaction monitoring in real-time. The hydrolysis of maltose is successfully demonstrated with the proposed method. The results indicate that the optimum condition for maltase is at pH 6.0 and 35℃. The proposed method can be used to reduce the cost and simplify the procedure of reaction monitoring in chemical, pharmaceutical and process industries. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This work is supported by the Environmental and Water Industry Development Council of Singapore (Research project Grant No. 1102-IRIS-05-04). REFERENCES [1] Roberge, D.M., et al., “Microreactor technology: A revolution for the fine chemical and pharmaceutical industries”, Chemical Engineering & Technology, 28(3), 318-323, 2005. [2] Mason, B.P., et al., Greener approaches to organic synthesis using microreactor technology. Chemical Reviews, 107(6), 2300-2318, 2007. [3] Gitlin, L., et al., “Micro flow reactor chips with integrated luminescent chemosensors for spatially resolved on-line chemical reaction monitoring”, Lab on a Chip, 13(20), 4134-4141, 2013. [4] Kamaruddin, M.J., et al., “Continuous and direct 'in situ' reaction monitoring of chemical reactions via dielectric property measurement: controlled polymerization”, Rsc Advances, 4(11), 5709-5717, 2014. [5] Yue, J., J.C. Schouten, and T.A. Nijhuis, “Integration of Microreactors with Spectroscopic Detection for Online Reaction Monitoring and Catalyst Characterization”, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 51(45), 14583-14609, 2012. [6] H. T. Zhao, Y.Y., L. K. Chin and A. Q. Liu, “Diffusion coefficient measurement based on diffusioninduced focusing in optofluidic waveguide”, μTAS2014, 1532-1534, Freiburg, Germany. CONTACT † A. Q. Liu; phone: +65-6790 4336; [email protected] 2112
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz