WWW.PLANNINGMI.ORG Issue Number 20 The Planning Commissioner What every planning commissioner should know TIPS FOR NEW COMMISSIONERS AND GENTLE REMINDERS TO VETERANS TO STRENGTHEN THE COMMUNITY’S PLANNING PROCESS Great communities do not simply happen. Great communities require careful planning and committed stewards to ensure that plans are implemented - intentionally and consistently. Planning issues have the ability to ignite emotions, and it is in the midst of such situations that commissioners must remember their role, their responsibility, and maintain the practices that will keep them out of court. While this article is written primarily with new commissioners in mind, for veteran commissioners it may serve either as a gentle reminder of practices forgotten, or as confirmation that they are indeed operating correctly. What is community planning all about? Duties and responsibilities The duties and responsibilities of a planning commission are defined by the Planning and Zoning Acts. The Acts were passed in response to local governments realizing the need for an independent, non-political entity to make decisions and recommendations regarding land use. All planning commissioners should read and have a basic understanding of the applicable Acts in their community. If the Acts are not understood, ask for and seek out training (see Resources box, page 8). transactions, findings, and determinations, which are usually incorporated as a part of the minutes of each commission meeting. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Planning Acts also make provision for the most important duty of the commission: the ability to prepare, maintain, and update the community general development plan (GDP). A GDP is also referred to as a master plan, comprehensive plan, future land use plan, or a combination thereof. The GDP is the community’s blueprint for the future, its vision. A comprehensive document, the plan examines land use, transportation, infrastructure, natural resources, housing, economic development, agriculture, and other key elements of the community. It is long-range, intending to guide development in the municipality over a planning horizon, continued on page 2 The Planning Acts give the local Community planning is a process. It is government the a process for coordinating the impact authority to plan and that people and their activities have on to create a planning the physical and social environment in commission. The which they live. We plan to make our Acts establish communities better for the next generation, the formation our children, and future residents to come. and function We plan to balance conflicting interests. of a planning Many times, development proponents are commission, allow seemingly at odds with those concerned the commission with protecting the environment and to adopt by-laws, maintaining a high quality of life. The reality and require that is that all positions require champions. Held the commission in tension, the interests balance one another, maintain a public producing a stronger, healthier community. record of resolutions, M I C HM III G A NIGGAAANSNSP O C I A T I O N O0 FTN H POALFNA NN N EI NR G — M A I KS M ISNU T ME P A GEK ,I GNS RG EE PG TA ER BAELTRA /C E S M I CCCHHHII G A N P LLAAASNNSNNOEECRRI A-- TJ6I AO N U A R Y P2I LV0 A 0 6N SN AI RN YG — 3 Planning and Zoning Public Acts • Township Planning Act: PA 168 of 1959, as amended. • Township Zoning Act: PA 184 of 1943, as amended. • Municipal Planning Act: PA 285 of 1931, as amended. • City and Village Zoning Act: PA 207 of 1921, as amended. • County Planning Act: PA 282 of 1945, as amended. • County Zoning Act: PA 183 of 1945, as amended. often 10 to 20 years. The plan sets forth public policies that will be followed regarding growth, development, and redevelopment. The information and concepts presented will guide decision making throughout a planning commissioner’s service and may guide those planning commissioners who serve in the years to come. A few things commissioners should know about a GDP: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A GDP AND ZONING ORDINANCE The GDP is a visionary document, projecting land use needs based on anticipated changes in population and economic growth. Plan policies and associated maps, particularly the future land use map, serve to guide land use decision making over a planning horizon (often 10 to 20 years). The zoning ordinance and map are tools to implement the GDP. Zoning is the law, regulating the activities allowed on a particular piece of land today. A common misconception is that the zoning map must conform to the future land use map immediately. Rather, changes to the zoning map that occur over time should be consistent with the land use designations recommended on the future land use map. The timing of the changes will depend on many local factors. Changes to the zoning map can be initiated by the government or private parties. 2 • The authority to prepare the GDP is vested with the planning commission; however, the governing body can assert its option to approve the plan. • When a community updates, amends, extends, or revises the plan, a notice of intent to the planning commissions in the neighboring communities, and the county, public utilities, railroads, and other registered entities must be sent. The commission must also provide copies of the draft plan to these entities and allow them the opportunity to comment, and provide notification of the public hearing. Neighboring communities reciprocate the same courtesy. Comments are advisory only. • The planning commission must review the GDP every five years and determine whether amendments or a new plan is necessary. If a community’s plan is greater than five years old, make its review the number one priority for the coming year. ZONING ORDINANCE • PERMITTED USES V. SPECIAL LAND USES The Zoning Acts confer many other duties to the planning commission: • Rezoning Recommendations: The process of changing the zoning classification of a property on the official zoning map. A rezoning may be initiated by an applicant or the planning commission. The legislative body has the final approval. (Note: county planning commissions review rezoning proposals or zoning map amendments for townships). • Zoning Text Changes: The process of amending the ordinance by revising, adding, or clarifying an existing requirement. Similar to a map amendment, the legislative body has final approval. • Site Plan Reviews: The process of ASSOCIATION O F • • The Zoning Acts provide the legal authority to enact a zoning ordinance. The zoning ordinance and associated official zoning map provide the regulatory mechanism for controlling the classification and regulation of land use. Zoning is the law, and it controls land uses based on today’s conditions. MICHIGAN • reviewing specific development proposals to ensure compliance with the zoning ordinance standards. The zoning ordinance can convey approval authority to the planning commission. Special Land Use Approvals: The process of reviewing specific development proposals to ensure compliance with the zoning ordinance and conformance with specific criteria in the ordinance. The zoning ordinance can convey approval authority to the planning commission. Subdivision Plat Reviews: The process for reviewing the location, layout, and design of new development. The legislative body has final approval. Capital Improvements Programming: Preparation of a plan for capital improvements that extends six years into the future and is updated annually. Review of Public Works Proposals: Review infrastructure improvements for consistency with the GDP. Every commissioner should be aware of the difference between permitted uses and special land uses (or conditional uses) established by the Zoning Act, and carried through by the zoning ordinance. A permitted use, or principal permitted use, is one that is granted by-right. For permitted uses, the approving body reviews the development proposal to insure that it complies with the zoning ordinance standards. Special land uses are those that may be compatible with permitted uses in the district, but possess characteristics or qualities that require individual review. Unlike reviews for permitted uses, special land use reviews: • Must demonstrate conformance with specific criteria set forth in the zoning ordinance. • Allow the planning commission to apply conditions to its approval. • Require that the planning commission issue a statement of its decision. PLANNING—MAKING GREAT PLACES HAPPEN • Require a public hearing. Of utmost importance is the statement required by the planning commission. This must contain the decision, basis for the decision, and any conditions imposed. This becomes part of the legal record and will be closely examined by a court of law should the applicant decide to challenge the decision. SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND LEGISLATIVE CHANGES It is important for planning commissioners to stay up-to-date on special conditions and legislative changes that impact local planning decisions. For example, the Township Zoning Act allows for a private residence with a day care serving less than seven children to be treated as a permitted use in all residential zones, including those zoned for single-family dwellings. This is a different set of standards than those applicable to day care facilities that operate with seven or more children. Such operations may be subject to a special land use review - a review that allows the commission to deny the application based on certain established criteria. The commission can also impose restrictions or conditions. Because larger day care operations are more common, often planning commissions will forget that smaller day care facilities are treated as The Grand Blanc Township Planning Commission established planning benchmarks to create an unparalleled quality of life for its residents, now, and in the future. (l. to r.) the Grand Blanc Township Planning Commission: Jim Wilson, Linda Kingston (Clerk), Jay Hoffman, Dan Gellings (Chair), Trenton Smiley, Ed Brown and Debra Lynn Tocarchick. permitted uses. Also, a zoning ordinance shall provide for and cannot exclude those instructing crafts and fine arts within single-family homes (e.g. piano teachers). While the planner is there to set the commissioner on the correct path regarding reviews, knowing the extent of the commission’s review can save time during meeting preparation. As is apparent from the dates of Act Site plan review: What are the decision making criteria? Standards vary by community and must be listed in the zoning ordinance. In general, there are three types of standards: 1. Plan Content: is all information required by the ordinance provided on the site plan? 2. Discretionary: standards that require the planning commission to use its judgment. For example, “Facades shall be harmonious with the area.” 3. Non-discretionary: standards that are quantitative. For example, “All sidewalks must be five feet wide.” If the site plan demonstrates conformance with all standards, then approval must be given. Although the planning commission is able to impose conditions to a site plan, the conditions must be related to meeting a specific ordinance standard. SMART GROWTH TACTICS - FEBRUARY 2006 adoption, planning followed zoning in the legislature. Zoning evolved as a result of public health conditions in the early 1900s: building setbacks, heights, and the separation of industrial and residential uses. Zoning was a tool to prevent dangerous, unhealthy conditions. As communities established and enforced zoning ordinances, the need to zone according to a plan for the future was realized, and it became apparent that guidelines were needed for the preparation of plans. Today, communities with planning commissions shall prepare and adopt a plan. State law requires that the ordinance be based on a plan. The GDP thus forms the basis upon which zoning decisions are made. With a plan in place, zoning decisions consistent with the plan have been presumed by the courts to be valid; it is up to the challenger to prove the municipality’s action is not valid. Absent a GDP, or with a pattern of decisions inconsistent with the GDP, the courts may find a municipality’s argument to be weaker, leaving the community more vulnerable to a negative ruling. 3 About site visits... When an applicant submits an application, it does not mean that planning commissioners are allowed on the site at will. Never physically walk the site without permission from the property owner. Remember that people can refuse access for a variety of reasons, including liability, and it does not mean that they are hiding something. If permission has been granted to access the site, keep the Open Meetings Act in mind. Communicate with fellow commissioners. Formation of a quorum for a site visit is a violation of the Act! An effective commissioner The commissioner is a public figure. The planning commission makes decisions on behalf of the community and in the best interest of the community as a whole. This is not an easy role, as many of a commissioner’s responsibilities evoke strong emotions. Actions, words, decisions, and even facial expressions will impact a commissioner’s effectiveness and credibility. The following tips are adapted from Welcome to the Commission, A Guide for New Members by the Planning Commissioners Journal and the Planning Commissioners Toolkit by the Michigan Association of Planning. BUILD TRUSTED RELATIONSHIPS WITH THE ELECTIVE BODY Plans are only effective when implemented. Because many implementation strategies go before the board or council for final approval, the board or council should be aware of the commission’s direction. For example, a township planning commission may work very hard on ordinance language to preserve agriculture. The commission recommends ordinance language to the board, which turns down the amendment soundly. The result is anger on behalf of the commission for time and effort wasted, and mistrust by the board for a commission that is acting counter to the board’s agenda (the 4 board is also there to serve the public). This is the worst scenario; the best scenario is for commission and board to be aware of planning activities and work in concert toward the GDP vision. Annual joint study meetings with the planning commission and governing body can help get everyone on the same page from a policy perspective. AT MEETINGS, ACT APPROPRIATELY Be attentive: the person speaking probably spent time preparing, perhaps left work early, or hired a sitter to appear before the commission. The speaker is there to be heard, so do listen attentively. Be polite: treat each person with equal respect. One way to show respect is to address the person by name (tip: jot down the speaker’s name after introductions). Be patient: remember that allowing the public to speak is part of the process. It may be nearing midnight, but the first speaker is just as important as the last. Be a good listener: commissioners are there to hear the public’s comment, consider it, and make a decision. Do not respond to emotionally charged or slanderous comments. PREPARE BEFORE EACH MEETING Being a commissioner requires a time commitment beyond that of regular attendance at meetings. Prior to the meeting, time should be spent reviewing meeting materials, formulating questions and, if necessary, visiting sites to be discussed at the meeting. As a new commissioner, it is important to understand planning jargon and acronyms to follow any discussions. Also, remember that any decision must be based on the content presented at the meeting - the public record. Do homework and keep an open mind. Also, questions may be answered before the meeting by contacting a staff planner or other resource. RESERVE COMMENTS UNTIL THE MEETING Do not give opinions about a proposal to the applicant, residents, or other commissioners. A polite refusal is MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION O F the correct response to requests for your opinion outside of the meeting. Keeping an open mind until all information and comments have been heard is the best course of action. KNOW WHEN TO RECUSE ONESELF In serving the community in which one lives and may work, conflicts of interest may arise. If there is a remote possibility that a decision will benefit a commissioner personally, tell fellow commissioners about the conflict and ask to be allowed to abstain from the vote. If unsure as to whether to remove oneself, consult the community’s attorney. KNOW ROBERT’S RULES OF ORDER Planning commissions follow parliamentary procedure, which has become synonymous with Robert’s Rules. While strict application is not always followed, the order is. For example, according to Robert’s Rules one should stand to be recognized by the chair. More commonly, one raises a hand to be recognized. Having a basic understanding of meeting order and terms often used will make a commissioner feel more comfortable and allow for more smoothly run ROBERT’S RULES: DO YOU KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TABLING AND POSTPONING AN ITEM? Many commissioners move to table an item, when actually the correct action is to postpone the item to a date certain. An item should be tabled if it is to be acted upon again later in the same meeting. Tabling refers to a time when in Parliament, royalty would come to address the assembled body and the pending motion would literally be placed on the table (tabled) until after the King or Queen left the room. Then, the tabled item would be removed from the table and debated. Postponing an item is usually the most appropriate motion to make when the intent is to resume debate at another meeting. A motion to postpone allows limited debate on the merits of postponing; a motion to table permits no debate from the members. PLANNING—MAKING GREAT PLACES HAPPEN Eight things every planning commissioner should know 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Planning and Zoning Laws Community’s Master Plan Robert’s Rules of Order The Open Meetings Act Importance of maintaining accurate records and stating findings of fact when approving, approving with conditions, or denying a request. The planning commission’s authority: when the commission has final approval and when it makes a recommendation to the Legislative Body. meetings. If a commissioner is unfamiliar with this practice, obtaining the handbook will serve well. BE EDUCATED AND STAY CURRENT MAP offers many training opportunities, as do other organizations around the state and nation. Michigan State University Extension office provides a Citizen Planner program, which is designed specifically for planning commissioners and elected officials. And, planning commissioners are in a position to educate others - every meeting is an opportunity to transfer technical knowledge to the public. ENJOY THE APPOINTMENT Commissioners are selected because of their concern for the future of the community. As an example, Grand Blanc Township in Genesee County was so impassioned about land use planning that the township set a new standard in its master plan. In addition to goals, objectives, and policies, the planning commission established planning benchmarks. Planning benchmarks are standards, amenities, and uses that other municipalities have incorporated to enhance their communities. It is anticipated that by building on techniques that have proven successful, the Grand Blanc Township will create an unparalleled quality of life for its residents, now, and in the future. Remember, planning commissioners are there to serve the residents of the SMART GROWTH TACTICS - FEBRUARY 2006 7. Past precedent: how the commission has interpreted or applied ordinance provisions in the past. 8. Proper meeting conduct: land use issues can provoke strong emotional responses. Always listen and treat people with respect and understanding. Finally, remember a planning commission’s principal purpose is to serve the public interest. A commission represents both those in the audience and those who choose to not attend the meetings. community and carry out the functions assigned by the legislative body. Following the recommendations above will enable a commissioner to build trusted relationships with both and be most effective as a commissioner. Helpful hints to prevent litigation FOLLOW PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS Due process comes from the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Procedural due process means that anyone has the right to bring a development proposal before the approving body—typically the planning commission—and that people impacted, or simply interested, have the right to comment on the proposal. Compliance with procedural due process is an important part of planning commission conduct. Regular meetings, open to the public and properly posted, are means for ensuring a fair process. Public hearings are also a component of due process. Residents may challenge at a public meeting that they were not properly notified. In response, a wellprepared planning staff may produce proof of mailing. This exchange is more than a test of staff competency; rather, the notification is a component of due process, and violation is cause for action to be postponed or a case may be challenged in a court of law. Another example is the 2001 amendments to the Planning Acts which require reviews by adjacent communities. These procedures must be followed or the plan could be rejected by a court for not following due process. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS (GDPS) Preparing a GDP is an undertaking that requires significant community resources. However, many communities experience frustration when their adopted plan is not upheld in court. For example, a community may adopt a plan that has a map indicating the Strengthening master plans A community may face challenges, but there are some steps commissions can take to reduce the potential for decisions against their plan: 1. 2. 3. 4. Follow the notification procedure stipulated in the Planning Act before beginning the process. Hold a public workshop to help determine the community’s vision for the future. Prepare a land use plan based on population projections and economic growth. Plan for adequate public services and facilities to match planned densities. Target higher densities in areas planned for urban services. 5. Create a future land use plan based on identified goals, objectives, and policies that support the plan. 6. Explain the intent of all maps and figures, whether conceptual or exact in nature (e.g., sewer service areas). 7. Where possible, include factual, scientific data to support the plan recommendations. 8. Include opportunities for public input. 9. Submit the plan for review in accordance with the Planning Act. 10. Adopt the plan after a public hearing. 11. Examine the plan for necessary updates or amendments every five years. 5 boundaries of the public sewer system. A few months later, the community is sued over its decision to deny a request to approve a development that requires public sewer outside of the boundaries shown on the GDP’s public sewer map. The court allows the extension and the community is outraged. Someone cries out, “Why plan if developers can do what they want anyway?” While certainly a plan can and may be challenged, there are steps a community can take to reduce the potential for decisions that are counter to plan policies (see Strengthening master plans sidebar, page 5). STATE FINDINGS OF FACT WHEN RENDERING A DECISION Denied applications can end up in court. Once there, the record will be examined for the statement or recommendation of denial by the planning commission. Such a statement should contain the conclusions relative to the request which specifies the basis for the decision and any imposed conditions. The zoning ordinance, and review by the planner, should provide a list of conditions used by the commission to evaluate the proposal. Inclusion of the conditions that have not been met—the basis of denial— must be in the statement, resolution, or motion. CONSISTENCY Zoning ordinances often leave room for interpretation. When such situations arise, it is possible that the commission has encountered the application of the ordinance provision before. If there is a question regarding interpretation or application of the ordinance, a commissioner may wish to speak with the planning director or planning consultant prior to the meeting. If there is not time, there is no problem with bringing the question to the commission as it may be a matter that other members struggle with as well. In fact, if the requirement is one that applicants repeatedly trip on, it may be one that the commission should address through an ordinance amendment. 6 Planning news, tools, and trends TAKINGS There has been much talk of late over takings, or the Takings Doctrine, with the June 2005 Kelo v. City of New London decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. Takings refers to a provision in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution that affords the government the power of eminent domain - the ability to take private property for a public use without the owner’s consent. Generally accepted application of exercising the power of eminent domain is for redevelopment of blighted or abandoned land, or for infrastructure projects (e.g. constructing highways, railroad lines, and utility corridors, and securing the rights-ofway for drains). The latest “brick in the wall” of takings case law came with the Kelo decision. The July 2005 issue of Planning and Zoning News provides an excellent overview of the case and the takings issue in general. To summarize, the New London Development Corporation (NLDC) prepared an economic development plan that was endorsed by the New London City Council. The city authorized NLDC to acquire property in its name, in accordance with the plan. Plan implementation involved taking private residential property and handing it to a private party for development of a residential community. The landowners whose private property was to be taken filed suit and lost. The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in favor of the City of New London, citing that under certain circumstances, economic development is a legitimate public use. However, it is important to note that case law in Michigan sets a different precedent. In November of 2004, the Supreme Court of Michigan established through its decision in Wayne County v. Hathcock that exercising the power of eminent domain to transfer property to MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION O F a private entity is only permissible if: 1) the transfer involves a public necessity of the extreme sort, such as highway, railroad, or canal projects construction projects; 2) the transfer requires that the private entity remains accountable to the public in its use of the property; and 3) the transfer itself is based on public concern, like blighted housing (Justice Ryan’s Dissent in County of Wayne v. Poletown). To further establish the use of eminent domain, an amendment to Public Act 149 of 1911 was introduced by State Representative Aldo Vagnozzi, D-37, in August of 2005. The amendment adds language that a “taking of private property is not considered to be for the use or benefit of the public if the property is transferred to a private entity for the primary benefit of the private entity.” The amendment currently rests with the Senate Government Operations Committee. CONDITIONAL REZONING In January 2005, amendments to the Zoning Acts were made that allow local governments to enter into agreements with developers for the rezoning of land under certain circumstances (conditional rezoning). The Act now states that a landowner may voluntarily offer in writing, and local governments may approve, certain use and development of land as a condition to a rezoning. Recognizing that the conditions are offered by the applicant is key; local governments are prohibited from requiring a landowner to offer items as a condition to the rezoning (this practice is referred to as an exaction). The amendments give local governments a tool that has previously been unavailable in Michigan. As pointed out in MAP’s Smart Growth Tactics Issue No. 13, in the past rezonings have been denied because local governments feared that a rezoning would open land to undesirable uses should the proposed and potentially desirable development fail to occur due to unforeseen circumstances. Many local governments would deny rezoning PLANNING—MAKING GREAT PLACES HAPPEN is a tool that allows for creative development. Under a PUD, a variety of housing, non-residential uses, recreational opportunities, and open spaces can be incorporated into one development. The result is a cohesive, mixed-use community. Another variation may provide for a residential community built with flexible lot sizes and reduced setbacks that enable creative planning and permanent preservation of open space. A 2003 amendment permits a community to approve a planned unit development with open space that is not contiguous to the rest of the development. This technique allows permanent preservation of valuable agricultural land. petitions that demanded infrastructure improvements before the community could provide them. The conditional rezoning technique provides an avenue for considering creative proposals for development. The full extent to which this new technique can be used is still a matter of debate. Local governments are advised to prepare for conditional rezoning applications by amending the zoning ordinance to address this tool or by adopting administrative provisions for receiving, reviewing, and approving applications. Procedures for enforcing the ordinance, should the applicant fail to meet the conditions of the agreement, should also be understood. JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION The Joint Planning Commission Act, Public Act 226 of 2003, provides a new tool for two or more local governments to plan together. The provisions of the Act allow for flexibility: two or more communities may either form one planning commission that replaces their individual commissions and governs the collective land area of the jurisdictions; or, two or more communities may form an additional commission that would govern MICHIGAN PLANNER - FEBRUARY 2006 a specific shared land area, while the individual commissions would continue to govern remaining land in their jurisdictions. Municipal boundary lines do not change, but planning areas can. One application of this valuable tool deals with the provision of land uses. Michigan law requires that communities provide for every land use. In the past, a village and township may have agreed to plan for and share commercial uses within the village, where services and downtown businesses exist. However, such a decision left the township vulnerable. If challenged, the township would need to provide land for a commercial use, which would then compete with village stores. Moreover, the rural township may not have the resources to support an intensive use, and may have a strong desire to remain agricultural. With Act 226, the two communities can legally share a common commercial land designation, promoting smart growth and targeting higher density where services are available. NON-CONTIGUOUS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS - A LAND PRESERVATION TECHNIQUE A Planned Unit Development (PUD) PUDs have been allowed under the Township and City and Village Zoning Acts since 1979. However, a 2003 amendment allowed PUD to become a land preservation technique. The Act states that, unless explicitly prohibited by the PUD regulations, a community may approve a PUD with open space that is not contiguous to the rest of the development. Suppose a community has a beautiful natural area noted in the GDP as an “area for targeted preservation.” A developer may purchase land in that targeted preservation area, as well as a second, non-contiguous parcel of land within the water and sewer service district. The developer could then propose a PUD on the latter parcel, with the open space requirement being satisfied by permanent preservation of the former. The concept is similar to a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program, whereby the density of Parcel A is transferred to Parcel B, resulting in Parcel A as a preserved open space and Parcel B as appropriately and more densely developed. However, the traditional TDR concept of sending and receiving zones, which has been used in other states, is politically complicated and challenging to implement. In contrast, a density transfer through a PUD is much simpler, as there is only one landowner involved. Additionally, the community only considers one proposal. PACKAGED WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS Packaged wastewater treatment plant technology has and continues to improve. Such systems are desirable for land development because they can facilitate 7 Compact, walkable development and development of accessible mass transportation systems that encourage walking and biking are strategies available to suburban communities to become healthier. development where soils prevent a private septic system, or where private systems have failed and public sewer is not yet available. However, many local governments have been apprehensive about packaged systems due to their reputation for being high maintenance and past failure rates (and local governments are the entity responsible for the system in the event of a failure). Communities use the provision of sewer services to direct density to certain geographic areas and preserve other land from development, and to “time” development. The advent of reliable packaged plants means that development can now occur at any time, and at densities that were once limited to the condition of the soil. A positive result could be the ability to provide cluster housing opportunities in rural areas, leaving large tracts of open space and/or agricultural land permanently preserved. An undesirable result could be patchy dense development in a community ill-equipped to provide public and emergency services to its rapidly increasing population. To add more cause for concern, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality no longer requires consideration of local zoning requirements as part of its review and approval of packaged systems. Packaged wastewater treatment plants provide new technology, but have the ability to allow development at densities not allowed and where other infrastructure and/or services do not exist. HEALTHY COMMUNITIES Communities, like people, can be healthy or unhealthy. Michigan has one of the country’s highest obesity rates and urban sprawl is cited as playing a contributing role. Many studies are linking the two, and common sense tells us that such a relationship is feasible. Suburban communities promote travel by car, not foot. Distances between destinations, time constraints, safety (particularly with regard to children), and insufficient transit keep most people in automobiles. This leads to decreased physical activity, which can increase the propensity for obesity and, subsequently, increased cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and other health problems (source: American Journal of Public Health). There are alternatives: compact, walkable development and development of accessible mass transportation systems that encourage walking and biking. And, there are strategies available to suburban communities to become healthier: allowing higher density near existing transit stops, amending ordinance requirements that encourage sprawl, targeting density to city centers, and developing a capital improvement program for improvements to the pedestrian environment. Communities can also look at “programming” and “partnering,” including 1) working with schools to foster walking and riding bikes to and from school; 2) encouraging new non-residential developments to provide bike racks and shower facilities for employees; and 3) working with police to eliminate or reduce public safety threats in pedestrian areas. Closing There are many resources available to planning commissioners: a staff planner or consultant, MAP, MSU Extension, and the American Planning Association are just a few. While local governments often operate as individual entities, each community has an impact and is impacted by its neighbors. The planning commissioner has the ability to make a difference in not just the community, but the collective community’s future. Public service can provide many personal rewards and can lead to community benefits that will last for generations. Vice President Rodney L. Arroyo, AICP, and Senior Planners Amy R. Golke, AICP, and Heidi M. Hannan, AICP, of Birchler Arroyo. Resources American Planning Association, www.planning.org Michigan Association of Planning, www.planningmi.org Michigan Townships Association, www.michigantownships.org Michigan Municipal League, www.mml.org Urban Land Institute, www.uli.org Michigan Land Institute, www.muli.org Planning and Zoning News, www.pzcenter.com SmartGrowthTactics Michigan Suburbs Alliance, www.michigansuburbsalliance.org Clearinghouse of national planning and development This publication was produced by the Michigan Association of Planning. information maintained by Urban Insight www.planetizen.org Photo and graphic credits: pages 1, 3, 7, and 8, Birchler Arroyo. MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION O F PLANNING—MAKING GREAT PLACES HAPPEN
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz