How to write A2 Section B (unit 3) essays Worth 40/70 marks for that exam. No choice. Question will be on Tudor Rebellions. 16 marks out of 40 are for recall of knowledge (AO1) 24 of the 40 marks are for your analysis and evaluation of interpretations and representations from the sources (historians’ accounts) How will the question be set up? 2 or 3 extracts from published sources You will be given a claim and you have to make a judgement about it. In so doing, you must compare, contrast and evaluate the views in the sources and INTEGRATE your own knowledge. The exam board recommend spending 20 minutes on reading, choice & planning. 50 minutes is left for writing. The Markscheme Tells you what the examiner is looking for The best essays will; Appreciate the full demands of the question Be written fluently and will be logically structured (AO1) Integrate wide ranging (eg different rebellions), accurate & well-selected knowledge with the sources. This knowledge will be directly relevant to the question (AO1) Interpret the sources with confidence and assimilate the historians’ views. It will also evaluate (make judgements about) and assess these views (AO2) debate the question, writing a sustained argument. It will also make the judgement explicit in the conclusion. The Introduction Is crucial Must impress, not depress, the examiner Must assess the topic Must outline the key factors you need to examine before reaching a conclusion Must outline any analytical/shades of grey questions you would need to answer in the conclusion Intro; the assessment of the topic Choose a quote from one of the secondary sources, which relates directly to the title Historian X therefore believes that …… (relate to the title). This is clearly in contrast to Historian Y’s view, who believes that…. Or, briefly outline the historiography of the issue Traditionally, historians have perceived ….. More recently, however, revisionist historians such as ……. have …….. Intro; outlining the key factors Essentially this lists your paragraph headings (historiography start) In order to ascertain which is the more accurate view, it is necessary to examine ……… (quote start) In order to ascertain the validity of his/her claim, it is necessary to consider………… Intro; asking analytical questions The answer is never going to be black and white What does a more in depth answer depend on? Think – time?, ruler, wording in the title? geography? Nature of people etc.? Furthermore, certain questions need to be borne in mind throughout. For example,… The Main Body of the Essay Have a clear counter and main argument Never mix them ‘Depends on analysis’ can come in the conclusion Plan your essay very carefully Have a set number of paragraph headings. These will be the aspects outlined in the Intro. (this could well be CAGE for rebellions on both sides of the argument). Think about the order of the paragraphs (chronology, links?) Identifying the counter and main arguments Make it clear to the examiner. For example; (CA) It can be argued that…… (relate to title, and use its words) (MA) On the other hand, there is (much) stronger evidence to presume that….. Again relate to the title What’s in a paragraph? S tatement E vidence X planation The Statement Tells the examiner what the aspect is, and how it answers the question For example, ‘Henry’s foreign legacy was largely negative’ The Evidence Remember to use the secondary sources as evidence ( 24/40 marks) as well as your own knowledge. You must INFER. Only directly quote in brackets to clinch a point. Make it clear which source you are using, and try to connect 2 sources from time to time For example, ‘ Using source 2, Historian X is of the opinion that Henry’s religious legacy was problematic (……..). Try to link sources….’Both sources X and Y agree that……’ or ‘’Contradicting source Y, source X suggests that…… Then use your own knowledge to corroborate or deny these claims. ‘Indeed, the Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536 …….Remember to carefully select evidence. You do not need it all The Explanation This does not need to be used all the time It can be useful, however, to summarise the argument of a paragraph For example, ‘Thus, as the evidence shows, Henry’s foreign legacy was largely positive’ The Conclusion Should not just summarise Should be definite Should consider the shades of grey Could use a quote which you agree with How to write the conclusion Start with a phrase such as ‘In conclusion’, …. Answer the question directly. E.g. ‘Re-phrase the interpretation to one you completely agree with. Explain the main reason why you think this. Bring in depends on analysis. E.g. ‘The answer can, however, never be clear cut, as the nature of Henry’s legacy depends on…..’ Then you must explain why. Use a quote to corroborate your argument if you can.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz