5/16/2017 Proximal Humeral Fractures ORIF with Locking Plates Trauma 101 2017 John D Wyrick MD University of Cincinnati Disclosures Consultant with Stryker Educational stipend Smith Nephew Indications Younger patients Good bone stock Healthy rotator cuff Multiple trauma Caution in pts >70, studies tending to recommend RTSA better than hemi 1 5/16/2017 Classification Codman originally described the 4 parts in 1934 Classification Neer 1970 JBJS Codman 1934 Widely used standard Provides treatment guidelines 4 parts >1cm or 45 deg Classification Varus angulation Original angulation or reduction Associated with higher risk of failure in recent literature on ORIF Not accounted for in Neer classification 2 5/16/2017 Fracture Patterns 3 and 4 part fxs Fx – dislocations Tuberosity fxs Proximal fx with shaft extension 3-Part Fractures Usually fracture through surgical neck and greater tuberosity CT useful for surgical planning 3 and 4-Part Fractures Historical treatment recommendations ORIF in young Elderly, hemiarthroplasty We need to learn to fix in the young population 3 5/16/2017 Valgus Impacted 3 & 4-Part Not to be confused with valgus impacted surgical neck Reduced AVN rate 4 part 21 to 75% Valgus impacted 8 to 26% More common than previously recognized Valgus Impacted 3 & 4-Part Treatment Court-Brown JBJSB 02 most managed nonop Most can be anatomically reduced and fixed Some amenable to min invasive techniques CT useful Valgus Impacted 3 & 4-Part Treatment Court-Brown JBJSB 02 most managed nonop Most can be anatomically reduced and fixed Some amenable to min invasive techniques CT useful 4 5/16/2017 Valgus Impacted 4 part Plating Technique Beach chair position Mini C-arm Plating Technique Beach chair position Mini C-arm Deltopectoral approach 5 5/16/2017 Plating Technique Beach chair position Mini C-arm Deltopectoral approach Tag the tuberosities Plating Technique Beach chair position Deltopectoral approach Tag the tuberosities Provisional fixation Plating Technique Beach chair position Deltopectoral approach Tag the tuberosities Provisional fixation Definitive fixation 6 5/16/2017 Recent Studies on ORIF with Locking Proximal Humerus Plate Thenasus et al, JSES 2009 Review of 12 studies, no comparisons Included 2,3,& 4 part fxs Constant score avg 74.3 AVN 7.9% overall, 14.5% in 4 part fxs Reoperation 14% Screw cutout 12% Nonunion 1.6% Recent Studies on ORIF with Locking Proximal Humerus Plate Solberg et al, JBJSA 2009, Compared 3 and 4 part fxs treated with ORIF vs hemiarthroplasty Nonrandomized, pts > 55y/o ORIF 38 pts, Hemi 48 pts Constant scores ORIF 69, 3 part=72, 4 part=65 Hemi 61, 3 part=60, 4 part=60 ORIF outcomes dependent on initial fx displacement, poorer for varus fxs Recent Studies PROFHER study, JAMA 2015 PRS, PH fxs to nonop vs op (ORIF or hemi) 270 pts, no diff in outcomes Much higher costs in op Higher complication rate No diff in revision rate 7 5/16/2017 Recent Studies ORIF better vs HA, RTSA ORIF higher reop rate 15% tub NU rate in HA Recent Studies Predicting Failure after Surgical Fixation of Proximal Humerus Fractures Krappinger et al, Injury 2011 Parameters associated with failed fixation Age, BMD, nonanatomic reduction, lack of medial support Proximal Humerus Cage New device Expandable cage Design to improve support for head Screws can purchase cage Can decrease secondary screw penetration Promising for valgus impacted fxs 8 5/16/2017 62 yo female, fall Displaced 2 part, ORIF 62 yo F Failed ORIF 9 5/16/2017 3 & 4 Part Fx – Dislocations Very challenging Some of the most difficult surgeries CTs on most all Not middle of the night cases 3 & 4 Part Fx – Dislocations 3 & 4 Part Fx – Dislocations 10 5/16/2017 3 & 4 Part Fx – Dislocations 3 & 4 Part Fx – Dislocations 3 & 4 Part Fx – Dislocations 11 5/16/2017 Segmental Neck-Shaft Fractures Segmental Neck-Shaft Fractures Segmental Humeral Fractures 12 5/16/2017 Segmental Humeral Fractures Segmental Humeral Fractures Locking Proximal Humeral Plate Complications Primary screw penetration 15% Secondary 8% Screw loosening Check screw positon flouroscopically in OR 13 5/16/2017 Locking Proximal Humeral Plate Complications Loss of fixation up to 13% Associated with Initial varus angulation > 60° Varus malreduction > 20° Lack of screws in inferior head Locking Proximal Humeral Plate Complications AVN Much lower than originally stated Overall around 8% 3 & 4 part fxs 1518% Summary High energy, fx-dislocations common in young Appropriate imaging Stable fixation with locking implants Be aware of complications, failed fixation, screw penetration Good luck! 14 5/16/2017 Bibliography 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Hertel, RJ et al, Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. JSES 2002, 11:331 Boileau, P et al, Three dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. JBJS Br 1997, 79:857 Thanasus, C et al, Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: A systematic review. JSES 2009, 18:837 Sudkamp, N et al, Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. JBJSA 2009, 91:1320 Brunner, F et al, Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: A prospective multicenter analysis. JOT 2009, 23:163 Solberg, B et al, Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures. JBJSA 2009, 91:1689 Bibliography 7. 8. Solberg, B et al, Locked plating of 3-and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in older patients: The effect of initial fracture pattern on outcome. JOT 2009, 23:113 Gardner, M et al, The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. JOT 2007, 21:85 15
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz