Updating Sappi growing stock information at stand level using aerial LiDAR data Precision Forestry Symposium 2017 One Sappi Intentional evolution 2020 vision André Wise Mensurationist Research, Planning and Nurseries Forest measurement evolution 1. Stand level: Sampling (3%) a) b) 2. Stand level: Full census – Transition a) b) 3. Contemporary technology, traditional concepts Semi spatial Sub stand level: Full census a) b) Intentional 2 Traditional technology Non-spatial evolution Contemporary technology, contemporary and traditional concepts Fully spatial Ground-based enumeration Traditional forest measurement Intentional 3 evolution Ground-based enumeration Stand level: Sampling (3%) a) b) Intentional 4 evolution Traditional technology Non-spatial Empirical growth modelling Height/SI 40 30 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 Utilizable Tons BA 400 50 40 DBH 300 30 200 20 100 10 0 TPH 0 1500 1000 500 0 0 Intentional 5 evolution 5 10 15 5 10 15 0 0 5 10 15 Stand level: Sampling Intentional 6 evolution Source: Sappi LiDAR updates 2016 Stand level: Enumeration sampling Age of enumeration data Intentional 7 evolution Source: Sappi enumeration data 2017 Stand level LiDAR measurement Intentional 8 evolution Stand level LiDAR measurement Stand level: Full census – Transition a) b) Intentional 9 evolution Contemporary technology, traditional concepts Semi spatial Stand level LiDAR measurement Height percentile extraction Intentional 10 evolution Percentile selection Example percentile fitting E.dunnii 80 25 15 20 25 15 20 Percentile value 25 25 95 25 90 20 Enum HM Edun evolution 20 Enum HM Edun 20 15 Intentional 15 Enum HM Edun 15 Percentile value 15 11 20 Percentile value 20 15 Percentile value 25 85 25 15 20 Enum HM Edun 25 Stand level LiDAR measurement Canopy height model Intentional 12 evolution Stand level LiDAR measurement Canopy height model Intentional 13 evolution Stand level LiDAR measurement Pixel percentile value Intentional 14 evolution Stand level LiDAR measurement Pixel percentile value Intentional 15 evolution Stand level LiDAR measurement Mean stand height Intentional 16 evolution LiDAR Height/SI Update classes: 1. Young (Eucalyptus < 3, pine < 7 years) Site Index update from updated SI map 2. Previously enumerated Update of height from LiDAR 3. Older (Eucalyptus > 3, pine > 7 years), non-enumerated compartments Update of Site Index from LiDAR LiDAR mean height (HM2) Intentional 17 evolution Conversion factor per species LiDAR dominant height (HD2) Site Index function SI = f(HD2, Age2, AgeSI) LiDAR SI Example of SI differences before and after update Relative change in SI. Red shows decrease, green shows increase. Intentional evolution Source: Hlelo plantation. Sappi LiDAR updates 2016 Stand level SI comparison All species, enumeration <5 years before LIDAR Intentional 19 evolution Source: Sappi LiDAR updates 2016 Basal area update (Previously enumerated) Stand Enumeration data TPH 1 Basal Area/ha 1 (BA1) Dominant height (HD1) Enumeration Age (Age1) Intentional 20 evolution Updated LiDAR Enumeration TPH survival model TPH2 = f(Age1,Age2,TPH1) Basal area projection model BA2 = f(BA1, TPH1, TPH2, HD1, HD2, Age1 ,Age2) TPH2 LiDAR dominant height (HD2) LiDAR Age (Age2) Basal Area/ha (BA2) Stand level LiDAR coverage Data measured and updated in 2016 Intentional 21 evolution Source: Sappi LiDAR updates 2016 Sub stand level LiDAR measurement Intentional 22 evolution Sub stand level LiDAR measurement Sub stand level: Full census a) b) Contemporary technology, contemporary and traditional concepts Fully spatial Intentional 23 evolution Source: Venus SI coverage. Sappi LiDAR data 2016. LiDAR TPH Intentional 24 evolution LiDAR stem count adjustment CHM Underestimate Intentional 25 evolution LiDAR stem count Adjustment Intentional 26 evolution Source: E. dunnii sliver plots. <1 ha. 1 to 7 yr old stands. LiDAR DBH estimate Output based on PSP data inputs (Not LiDAR measurements) Fitting of beta functions per species/region based on PSP and other enumeration data (include site variables). DBH = f(LiDAR height, LiDAR TPH, Beta) Intentional 27 evolution Source: Sappi PSP data. E. dunnii. LiDAR measurement outputs Pixel level forest measurement TPH HM 800 15 150 100 50 600 50 1000 Frequency 20 150 200 250 1200 TPH 100 25 Frequency -3354000 -3353800 -3353600 -3353400 HM 10 0 0 400 10 15 20 25 400 600 v v Dq Vol 1000 1200 15 14 50 50 16 100 150 200 250 18 Frequency 20 20 100 25 22 Frequency -3354000 -3353800 -3353600 -3353400 24 150 Vol Dq 10 0 0 12 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 10 v -84100 -83900 -83700 -83500 -84100 -83900 -83700 Intentional evolution 15 20 v -83500 LID 1097440 28 800 HM 17.08 TPH 894 Dq 16.59 Vol 9084.89 25 LiDAR measurement outputs Pixel-level forest measurement Intentional 29 evolution Conclusion Intentional 30 evolution Plantation growing stock variables Full coverages Variable LiDAR Enumeration Plantation level Coverage 100% (max 2 year old data) 30% (1-8 year old data) Compartment level Sample % Area Data source Sample % Area Data source Height/SI 100% Direct <3% Direct TPH 100% Adjusted <3% Direct Diameter 100% Derived 3% Direct Volume 100% Derived 3% Derived Intentional 31 evolution Acknowledgements Dr. Horst Kassier Dr. Riyad Ismail Giovanni Sale Nico Hattingh Sappi Research Team Sappi GIS Team Intentional 32 evolution
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz