LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS WISCONSIN 612 W. Main Street, #200 Madison, WI 53703-4714 ® (608) 256-0827 lwvwi.org March29,2017 To:SenateCommitteeonJudiciaryandPublicSafety Re:SB52,SB53,SB54,SB55,SB59 TheLeagueofWomenVotersofWisconsinbelievestherearethreeimportantmeasuresinestablishingcriminal sanctions.Societyisprotectedfromcriminalactsbydeterrence,incapacitationandreform.Wehaveajustice systemwhosepurposeistoreviewcriminalactsbycitizensandtotakeappropriateactiontoprotectsocietyand helppreventfurthercriminalacts.Thefinaldispositionoftheseactionsisinthehandsofjudges.Itisthedutyof thejudgetoheartestimonyanddecideoncriminalsentencesonacase-by-casebasis. Forthesereasonsweoffersupportoroppositiontosomeofthelegislationatthispublichearing. SB52removesthethreeyearlimitontheamountoftimetheDepartmentofCorrectionsmayplacecertain juvenilesintheSeriousJuvenileOffenderProgramandwhowouldbeheldinajuvenilecorrectionalfacility.This suggestsanincreasedlimitintheyearsindetention.SB59increasestheoffensesforwhichajuvenilecanbe placedintheSJOProgram,whichispredictedtoincreasethenumbersinjuvenilefacilities.Thestateof WisconsinisstilldealingwiththeabuseproblemsthatoccurredatLincolnHillswithnosuretythatthese problemswillallberesolvedinthenearfuture.Fortheprotectionofthosejuvenilesheldinconfinementwe opposebothSB52andSB59.WesupporttheMissourisystemofjuvenilecorrectionsasreflectedin AB102/SB70,whichwouldpatternthestate’sjuveniledetentionsintoregionalfacilitiesasissuccessfullydonein Missouri. SB53removestherequestforanexpungementorderatthetimeofsentencingandallowsapetitiontothe courtoneyearaftersentenceservedandwithpaymentofafee.WesupportSB53whichwouldmoreeasily allowcitizenstoexpungerecordsofjuvenileactions. WeopposeSB55,becauseitsetsahighermandatoryminimumsentencethancurrentlegislation.Thisisan unnecessaryandintrusiveprovisionandremovesevenmorediscretionfromjudgesintheirattempttoweigh thefactorsthatwilldetermineajustandappropriatesentence. Currently,theDepartmentofCorrectionsmaytakephysicalcustodyofapersononextendedsupervision,parole orprobationifthepersonischargedwithacrime.WeopposeSB54becauseitrequiresarecommendationof revocationbytheDOCifthathappens.WiththeWisconsinprisonpopulationontherise,removalofDOC discretionhereissimilartoincreasingmandatorysentencing,thecontinuedexpansionofabloatedCorrections budget. ThankyoufortheopportunitytoexpressoursupportforSB53andtoexpressourconcernandoppositionto SB52,SB54,SB55andSB59.
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz