If I Say “It’s Racist,” Will You Still Be My Friend?
White Privilege from an Asian-American Woman’s Point of View
by Lelanda Lee
I had been friends with Lacy for almost seven years. We volunteered together at church.
Our favorite thing was going out to dinner after a meeting, which happened almost
weekly. We both had grown children with troubled marriages. Our husbands worked out
of town a lot. Our birthdates are within a year of each other’s. We both grew up poor,
she in the country, and I in the city. We traveled together on women’s retreats. We felt
so close that we often joked we were really sisters separated at birth by genetics. She is
a beautiful blue-eyed blond, and I am 100% Chinese.
Over the years in various meetings, I had heard Lacy say “It’s like Chinese water
torture,” to describe the same bad behavior being repeated in different settings. Each
time Lacy said it, I would cringe inside and go home and ruminate for a week or longer,
because her saying “Chinese water torture” just didn’t feel right in my gut. In the seventh
year of our friendship, Lacy and I were having dinner in a restaurant, reconnecting after
busy periods at work. I can’t remember what Lacy was talking about, but the words
“Chinese water torture” came out of her mouth, and this time, something happened.
This time, I said, “You know, Lacy, saying “Chinese water torture” is racist, and it hurts
me every time I hear you say it.”
Lacy put her fork down. Tears welled up in her eyes. Silence.
An oasis of absolute silence filled the middle of the busy chain restaurant. And I felt the
need to say something to make my friend feel better. So, I said, “Lacy, I didn’t mean to
hurt you by calling you on saying ‘Chinese water torture.’ I know you didn’t mean to be
racist by saying it.”
By then, Lacy, who is a very competent woman with experience handling difficult
people, responded in her own defense. “Well, I didn’t think saying ‘Chinese water
torture’ is racist, because, you know, it’s historical, and since it’s based on history, it’s
not racist. ‘Chinese water torture’ describes the way the Chinese used to torture people.
Drip, drip, drip . . . they dripped water on people’s foreheads until it drove them crazy.”
Feeling like I was having an out of body experience, I replied, “I don’t think the Chinese
ever tortured people that way. I don’t think it’s historical or factual.”
We managed to get through the rest of dinner. Both of us acknowledged that it was not
our intent to hurt the other. Even though she didn’t think it was racist, Lacy said that she
would stop saying “Chinese water torture,” now that she knew it hurt me. I felt the need
to make some peace offering. So, I apologized again to Lacy for making her feel badly,
and I said, “I hope this doesn’t hurt our friendship.”
© Lelanda Lee, September 2007, [email protected]
1.
That evening at home I researched “Chinese water torture” online and learned that the
torture method described by that phrase originated under a different name with an
Italian lawyer of the sixteenth century. There is no historical evidence the Chinese or
any other Asians ever tortured people in that way. “Chinese water torture” probably
came into popular parlance around 1913 when Harry Houdini performed an escape trick
known as the “Chinese water torture cell” in which he was bound and placed upside
down in a glass and steel chamber filled to overflowing with water. It is likely that the
phrase “Chinese water torture” found its way into the vernacular in the same timeframe,
around World War I, that terms like “Chinese fire drill,” “Chinese ace,” and “Chinese
navy” appeared, connoting disorganized, chaotic, and bumbling, and foreign,
mysterious, and devious, all pejoratives applied to the name of people from China.
I sent Lacy a copy of my research that same evening by email, and subsequently, I’ve
sent her a few other emails informing her of events and extending condolences when
her sister-in-law died. I saw her in church one Sunday, and we commiserated briefly
about how overly busy our lives are. Her little granddaughter hugged my legs. I hugged
Lacy.
Today, many weeks later, I don’t know if my best girlfriend is still my best girlfriend. And
I don’t know how to reach out to her to pick up where we left off without my having to
apologize again, without my having to take responsibility for making my White girlfriend
feel badly because she said a racist thing, and without my having to take responsibility
for making my White girlfriend feel better because her self-image of herself as a nonracist is tarnished.

As a Non-White I have been most deeply hurt by those Whites whom I count as friends
and allies, such as, my husband, my best girlfriend, my colleague working on AntiRacism, and my boss and mentor. The reason I name these hurts as the deepest is
because they come unexpectedly and surprisingly from those whom I had hoped would
"know better" than to say the hurtful thing or to hold the hurtful prejudice or stereotype.
After all, these are highly educated and spiritual people with good morals and ethics.
These are people who love and esteem me. These hurts cut deeply because of the
difficulty on my part of "calling out" this hurtful behavior with these White people who
think of themselves as "beyond" these prejudices and stereotypes.
A question that Non-Whites often ask when we are together is “Why don’t Whites just
get it?” Is it possible for Whites to know better? I think the answer is Yes, No and
Maybe.
Yes, Whites can know better about how to behave in racially and culturally sensitive
ways if they have been educated in anti-racist behavior and if they continue to learn, to
© Lelanda Lee, September 2007, [email protected]
2.
be self-reflective, to be open to correction, and to make amends when they act in racist
ways. If Whites are serious about embracing anti-racist behavior, then they must
embrace the understanding that injustice against one diminishes all as co-inhabitants of
this interrelated planet. Racist behavior leaves a stain on the perpetrator that is as ugly
as the injustice experienced by those oppressed by racism.
No, Whites cannot know better than to hold the hurtful prejudice or stereotype, because
they are steeped in the privileges afforded by being part of the dominant culture in this
country. You don’t have to do anything more than be born with White skin to have
privilege. Privilege is its own reward. Privilege means never having to say you’re sorry,
even when you’re behaving in a racist way. Privilege begets privilege. Privilege means
expecting others to say they’re sorry when they’ve pointed out to you that you’re
behaving in a racist way. Privilege means you can feel that you’re right even when
you’re in the wrong. Privilege makes you the one who’s okay.
Maybe, Whites can know better than to behave in racist ways when they ally with NonWhites, and together, we strive to understand what underlies what we say and how we
behave. You cannot assume knowledge of another person’s motivation for their
behavior. To get to understanding requires a whole lot of steps beginning with a
curiosity to know the other or, a ratchet up, a desire to know the other. Getting to know
the other requires patient listening, an open attitude of observing, a willingness to be
taught, a willingness to be led, a vulnerability to ask questions in order to learn more, a
thick skin to withstand hurt feelings—your own and the other’s—and finally, the fortitude
to stick with it for an extended time, for a long, long time, for our lifetime.
Let’s not stop with knowing better. Let’s not stop with just getting it. What about doing
better? Behaving better? What about stopping the racist behavior? What about calling
other White people out when they are being racist? What about enforcing the civil rights
laws? Dismantling the racist institutions? What about giving up some of your White
privilege? Doing away with the Good Ol’ Boys Clubs? Making amends? Giving
reparations?
My hope for White anti-racism activists is that you intentionally maintain an attitude of
openness and listening in order to hold a space for Non-Whites so that we can "call out"
hurtful racist behavior. I want my White anti-racist allies to take particular responsibility
and demonstrate initiative for "calling out" the racist behavior of other Whites, even at
the risk of ostracization, reprimand or retribution, and especially to do so when a NonWhite is in the midst of the scenario, feeling alone and victimized. You will not always
know when a Non-White feels isolated and vulnerable, because Non-Whites are often
polite even as we are being victimized. Retreating into good manners, because good
manners indicate good breeding (i.e., good breeding is not “as colored”), is a protective
shell we put on.
In my mind, as a Non-White, it is a "White Privilege" to be involved in a movement that
addresses White Privilege. Yes, White Privilege must be addressed in the overall
panorama of addressing racial justice, but let's not get stuck there, because it is
© Lelanda Lee, September 2007, [email protected]
3.
absolutely necessary that we get to the work of redressing the wrongs of racism and
affirmatively raise up Non-Whites to share the opportunities, responsibilities and
benefits of this society. In other words, we must remember to focus a sufficient portion
of our energies, psyches, and economic and other resources to address the fruits of
racism, which include redlining, gerrymandering, abysmal inner city schools,
discrimination against immigrants, an unjust justice system, unequal access to
healthcare and employment, misogynistic laws, etc.
In terms of group dynamics among anti-racist activists I see an ongoing challenge in
how to maintain a generative level of tension between masterful organizing led by
Whites and the raising up of Non-White Leaders who may not have had equal
opportunities to develop their (mainstream dominant culture) leadership skills and
knowledge to the same level of mastery as achieved by Whites. The reality is that in so
many group dynamics, neither invitation nor accommodation has been extended to
include multicultural ways of getting things done. While it is important from a task-results
viewpoint to do things at an excellent level, it is also important to value the content and
ideas that are not cloaked in masterful or sophisticated (mainstream dominant culture)
style and to resist the impulse to "improve" those contributions. This is where honesty
on the part of both Whites and Non-Whites is necessary to prevent the conversation
from being "hi-jacked" by either group. Everyone who participates has to be willing to
risk being hurt and being one who hurts others by speaking truth. It is only by speaking
truth that we can move closer to the ideal of our highest humanity to each other. One
can never be sorry about telling the truth, even if you lose your best friend.
© Lelanda Lee, September 2007, [email protected]
4.