1/27/2016
Which P.O.V Is Right For Your Story? | LitReactor
Hello, if this is your first time here, Login with Facebook or create a free account to get started. Otherwise, Click here to log in
Follow @litreactor
Like
Online Classes
Writers Workshop
Magazine
Community
Shop
Take A Tour
Frontpage News Columns Interviews Reviews Featured Stories Podcast Craft Essays Features
Which P.O.V Is Right For Your Story?
COLUMN BY JON GINGERICH OCTOBER 12, 2011
Editor's Picks
3 COMMENTS
IN: CRAFT NARRATOR POV VOICE
Storyville: My 8 Most Anticipated Books of
2016
Column by Richard Thomas
8 Ways To Fix Your Social Media Screw-Up
Column by Peter Derk
The 5 Books I Wish Someone Would Write in
2016
Column by Cath Murphy
One Month of Reading Joe Hill: A Primer
Column by Michael David Wilson
Book vs. Film: 'The Silence of the Lambs'
Column by Christopher Shultz
Given this is a column about writing craft, it’s inevitable that sooner or later we’re going to have to discuss point
of view. At its core, P.O.V. is an issue of perspectives. The mode of narration you choose fundamentally alters
how your story will be received.
While writing transcends the visual, you should think like a director when choosing your P.O.V.: you need to
make a judicious decision regarding how “close” or “far” you want your narrator to be in relation to your
Our Upcoming Classes
characters. The placement of this narrative “eye” can be used to forge an extremely strong bond between
narrative and reader. Sherwood Anderson’s Winesburg, Ohio, for example, places the narrative at a fable­like
distance, as if we’re looking over the town and moving from character to character, lending the story the idea of a
shared, unified experience. Extreme close­ups, on the other hand (e.g., Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury), can
place the reader in uncomfortably internal spaces, subjecting them to a character’s psychosis. While there are a number of different modes of narration, it’s important to mention that all P.O.V.s essentially do
one of two things: they serve either as an observer in the action or a participant in it. Below is a look at the
first­,second­, and third­person points of view, with a breakdown of the advantages and disadvantages of each.
Without question, the single greatest advantage to first­person P.O.V. is access. First­person perspectives can
be extremely powerful because the narrative is essentially a mouthpiece for the character, and we’re given
unrestricted admittance into his/her thoughts, opinions, voice and worldview. The main drawback is that this
access offers only a single, limited voice; the character (referring to him/herself with “I”) can only describe what
she/he knows, and then only to the extent of the communicative/mental powers you’ve granted. As such, its
extremely restricted range can compromise its allure. There’s a common misconception among many beginning
writers that first­person P.O.V. is the easy default. In reality, first person is an extremely difficult P.O.V. to master.
You need chops to transmit a credible voice consistently. Too often in the beginner’s story, first­person
characters make claims that aren’t earned, or they account for exposition by digressing into jarring, soliloquy­
https://litreactor.com/columns/which-pov-is-right-for-your-story
What's Popular?
Book vs. Film vs. TV Series: 'Hannibal'
Column by Christopher Shultz
The Dreaded R-Word: The Goods and Evils of Rhetoric
1/4
1/27/2016
Which P.O.V Is Right For Your Story? | LitReactor
length rants. In either case, the voice begins to take on the role of narrative custodian, and the story fails on the
Column by Taylor Houston
authenticity meter. The only time you should use first­person is if the voice is well­crafted, unique, constant, and
compelling, so access to the character makes it worth your readers’ while to see his/her world in tunnel­vision.
One way to make sure an organic perspective is maintained in first­person is to constantly ask: how does my
character see the world? What would they say in this situation? Another salve for first­person narratives is the
Self-Editing For Dummies
Column by George Cotronis
use of dialogue from other characters. If you’re going to write in the first­person, you’re going to need lots of it,
because outside dialogue is the only objectivity your reader is going to get.
Of course, there are other variations of the first­person P.O.V., and each offer the writer varying degrees of
leeway. There’s first­person multiple vision, where the story rotates around several narrating characters
(Russell Banks’ The Sweet Hereafter or Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying are examples of this), and there’s the rare
first­person peripheral, where a non­protagonist character narrates the actions of the protagonist (e.g., The
Great Gatsby).
Third person is the most common P.O.V., and for a reason. The biggest benefit of the third­person is the
amount of flexibility it provides: an unspecified narrator moves in and out between the character (referred to as
“she” or “he”) and the larger world. As such, the story gets the character’s thoughts and actions but P.O.V. is not
limited to the character’s understanding of their world. Because it’s not as intrusive as first­person however,
10 Mistakes (Almost) Every Rookie Writer
Makes
Column by Susan DeFreitas
Patton Oswalt's Night Café, 'The Great
Gatsby' and How Guided Reading Can
Reinvigorate a Classic
Column by Bart Bishop
access in the third is limited, and can’t take full advantage of a compelling voice.
Third­person P.O.V. is extraordinarily diverse in its application. There are a number of third­person P.O.V.s, and
We Think You'll Like This Class
while some are more popular than others, each deserves some mention here.
The most common of the third­person P.O.V. is the third­person limited (also called third­person close or
third­person single vision). In this case, the narrator presents the story from the perspective of a single
character, the main character in the story. Like first­person, the thoughts and beliefs of the character are
revealed, but because they’re ultimately told from a different perspective (the narrator’s), we aren’t limited to the
character’s subjective interpretation. It should be mentioned that while the third­person limited follows our
character relentlessly throughout the story and has full access to his/her thoughts, it can’t avail what the
character doesn’t know.
Third­person omniscient is where an all­knowing narrator moves from character to character with the ability to
independently reveal anything it wants. Here the narrator is granted unprecedented leeway: it knows the past,
Funny Pages with Patrick Wensink
the present, the thoughts and beliefs of all our characters, and may hold a judgment or opinion regarding each.
The biggest benefit of the omniscient is that it can supply us with information our characters’ may not know, such
March 10, 2016 ­ March 24, 2016
as where the story is headed or some arching historical or moral perspective. The disadvantage is that it’s a
You have a natural sense of humor, even if you don't
dated voice; hardly anyone uses it anymore. As such, it’s typically found in stories now destined for the "classics"
realize it. It's hard to bring it out in your writing—so let
bin.
novelist and comedian Patrick Wensink show you how
to bring the funny.
Personally, I like an omniscient P.O.V. Sometimes the best use of omniscient­third occurs when the narrative
wall is broken and it employs an alternating­person P.O.V. One of my favorite uses of this is in Steinbeck’s East
of Eden, where the omniscient narrator is later revealed to be a distant relative of the protagonist family. A more
recent application of this P.O.V. is in Junot Diaz’s The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao. An omniscient
narrator, who moves back and forth in time, is later revealed to be the protagonist’s former roommate. I should
mention there is a great deal of suspended disbelief needed for both cases to work — or at least
acknowledgment that editorial liberties were taken by the narrator — because non­omniscient people are later
revealed to be oracles of information (like characters’ thoughts) they could not have possibly known.
Third­person objective is where the narrator follows many characters but never has access to their thoughts (a
classic example of this is Shirley Jackson’s short story “The Lottery”). One benefit to this P.O.V. is that it strives
for a journalistic truthfulness; it allows the story to be seen equally from many different viewpoints and angles,
complete with diverse array of dialogue. Another advantage is it quickens the story’s pace. The disadvantage to
this “camera lens” approach is that it’s the nadir of the third­person’s preexisting disadvantage: it allows
absolutely no inside access.
Third­person multiple vision is where perspective moves from character to character, one at a time, allowing
alternate points of view revealed by the narrator. It can be very effective for “point / counterpoint” setups where
the thoughts of two conflicting characters are pitted against each other (check out Mary Gaitskill’s short story “A
Romantic Weekend,” for a great example of this). The drawback lies in its abrupt changes. Remember, adhering
to a P.O.V. creates an extremely strong bond. You don’t want to break that connection just because you can.
Too much “head hopping” among too many points of view can quickly diminish the reader’s investment in the
story.
Out of all the different P.O.V.s we’ve discussed, second­person is probably the least common. In this case the
narrator has designated an unspecified “you” (i.e. the reader) as the focal point in the story. The biggest
advantage of this P.O.V. is that it’s intrinsically intimate; it literally makes “you” part of the story (Jay McInerney’s
novel Bright Lights, Big City or Wells Tower’s short story “Leopard” both showcase excellent uses of this
technique). Aside from the glut of Choose Your Own Adventure serials published in the ’80s however, hardly
anyone else experiments with this unique P.O.V. I would argue that second­person offers another unique
advantage, and it’s why I’ve saved it for last: like first­person, this P.O.V. allows a very close access to a
character and his/her thought process, but like the third­person, you aren’t limited by that voice. So, in a way it
offers the best of both worlds. The main problem with this P.O.V. is that it’s awkward. It reads like an
https://litreactor.com/columns/which-pov-is-right-for-your-story
2/4
1/27/2016
Which P.O.V Is Right For Your Story? | LitReactor
advertisement, it’s tedious and alienating. It also makes for a very unreliable narrative; it sets no appropriate
boundaries between readers and the main character so it feels like you’re stepping on readers’ toes. It also takes
an unusually great deal of suspended disbelief in order to convince the reader that “you” are the character the
writer has created.
One more point to consider about point of view. Every once in a while it becomes apparent that your story could
benefit from a change in perspective (Fitzgerald’s first draft of the The Great Gatsby, for example, was initially
from the perspective of the protagonist), but if you have a clear understanding of what your story is “about” and
how it should be told, most of the time P.O.V. will come naturally. Remember to think in cinematic
long/medium/close­up terms when kicking around preliminary ideas for your story, experimenting with how “near”
or “far” you want your characters to be and how this reflects the internal logic or any grand theme your story may
have. Good luck and keep writing!
Find out about Jon Gingerich's 'Fundamentals of Short Fiction' class, which begins April 23rd!
Winesburg, Ohio (Signet Classics)
Author: Sherwood Anderson
Price: $5.95
Publisher: Signet (2005)
Binding: Mass Market Paperback, 272 pages
The Sound and the Fury: The Corrected Text
Author: William Faulkner
Price: $8.79
Publisher: Vintage (1990)
Binding: Paperback, 326 pages
Column by Jon Gingerich
Jon Gingerich is editor of O'Dwyer's magazine in New York. His fiction has been
published in literary journals such as The Oyez Review, Pleiades, Helix Magazine, as well
as The New York Press, London’s Litro magazine, and many others. He currently writes
about politics and media trends at www.odwyerpr.com. Jon holds an MFA in creative
writing from The New School. Some of his published fiction can be found at
www.jongingerich.com.
You Might Also Like...
More By This Author
Submit Yourself: A Submissions Calendar is a
Smart Idea
Symbolism: Storytelling and the Invisible Hand
The Changing Character
Rejection: A Critical Device
Write What You Don’t Know
Kill Those Modifiers!
Writing Effective Dialogue
Five Plot Devices That Hurt Your Writing
Putting An End To Plot Conveniences
10 Stories We Never Need to See in
Workshops Again
To leave a comment Login with Facebook or create a free account.
https://litreactor.com/columns/which-pov-is-right-for-your-story
3/4